Hubbry Logo
John Dustin ArchboldJohn Dustin ArchboldMain
Open search
John Dustin Archbold
Community hub
John Dustin Archbold
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
John Dustin Archbold
John Dustin Archbold
John Dustin Archbold
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

John Dustin Archbold (July 26, 1848 – December 5, 1916) was an American businessman and one of the United States' earliest oil refiners. His small oil company was bought out by John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company. Archbold rose rapidly at Standard Oil, handling many of the complex secret negotiations over the years. By 1882, he was Rockefeller's closest associate, and typically acted as the company's primary spokesman. Rockefeller, after 1896, left business matters to Archbold while he pursued his philanthropy; as vice president, Archbold effectively ran Standard Oil until his death in 1916. Inspired by Rockefeller's policies, Archbold's main goals were stabilization, efficiency, and minimizing waste in refining and distributing petroleum products. When the company was broken up by the Supreme Court in 1911 into 34 smaller operations, Archbold became president of the largest one, Standard Oil of New Jersey.

Key Information

Personal life

[edit]

Archbold was born to Methodist minister Reverend Israel Archbold and Frances Foster Dana (Archbold) in Leesburg, Ohio. After being educated in public schools, he moved to Pennsylvania by 1864.[1]

On February 20, 1870, Archbold married Annie Eliza Mills, "daughter of Samuel Myers Mills of Titusville and Lavinia Jenkins."[2] The couple had four children:

In 1885, Archbold purchased a large mansion in Tarrytown, New York. The estate, called Cedar Cliff, was located at 279 S. Broadway just across from the Carmelite Transfiguration Church.[4]

Professional life

[edit]

Standard Oil Company

[edit]
Share of the Standard Oil Trust, issued 5 April 1882, made out to John Dustin Archbold

In 1864, Archbold went to the north-west Pennsylvania oil fields and spent 11 years in the oil industry there. When John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company began buying up refiners in this oil-rich region, many independent refiners felt squeezed out, and Archbold was among Standard's harshest and loudest critics. In 1885, after becoming skeptical of reports of oil discoveries in Oklahoma, he sold-out at a loss, saying "I'll drink every gallon produced west of the Mississippi!"[5]

Archbold was subsequently recruited by Rockefeller to Standard Oil, where he became a director and served as its vice-president and president until its dissolution in 1911. Between 1911 and 1916, Archbold was president of the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey.[6]

Archbold once made a $250,000 donation to the National Kindergarten Association,[7] to whose board of directors his wife was elected in 1911.[8]

The Hepburn Committee

[edit]

A. Barton Hepburn was directed by the New York State Legislature in 1879 to investigate the railroads' practice of giving rebates within the state. Merchants without ties to the oil industry had pressed for the hearings. Prior to the committee's investigation, few knew of the size of Standard Oil's control and influence on seemingly unaffiliated oil refineries and pipelines – Hawke (1980) cites that only a dozen or so within Standard Oil knew the extent of company operations. The committee counsel, Simon Sterne, questioned representatives from the Erie Railroad and the New York Central Railroad and discovered that at least half of their long-haul traffic granted rebates, and that much of this traffic came from Standard Oil. The committee then shifted focus to Standard Oil's operations. John Dustin Archbold, as president of Acme Oil Company, denied that Acme was associated with Standard Oil. He then admitted to being a director of Standard Oil. The committee's final report scolded the railroads for their rebate policies and cited Standard Oil as an example. This scolding was largely moot to Standard Oil's interests since long-distance oil pipelines were now their preferred method of transportation.[9]

Archbold Stadium, Syracuse University

Syracuse University

[edit]

In 1886, Archbold became a member of the board of trustees of Syracuse University, and was the board's president from 1893 until his death in 1916. From 1893 to 1914, he contributed nearly $6,000,000 for eight buildings, including the full cost of Archbold Stadium (opened 1907, demolished 1978; the Carrier Dome was built on this site), Sims Hall (men's dormitory, 1907), Archbold Gymnasium (1908, nearly destroyed by fire in 1947, but still in use), and the oval athletic field.[10]

1912 political cartoon (Thomas E. Powers, US Library of Congress)

Theodore Roosevelt scandal

[edit]

Archbold was involved in a scandalous affair involving monetary gifts to the Republican Party. In 1912, he was called to testify before a committee which was investigating political contributions made by the Standard Oil Company to the campaign funds of political parties. He claimed that President Theodore Roosevelt was aware of the $125,000 contribution made by Standard Oil Company to the 1904 campaign fund of the Republican Party, but Roosevelt produced letters written by him which directed his campaign managers to return such monetary contributions if they were offered.

Assassination attempt

[edit]

In 1915, an attempt was made by anarchists and Industrial Workers of the World radicals to assassinate Archbold at Cedar Cliff by planting a large dynamite bomb at the entrance to the estate.[11][12] The bomb, which failed to go off, was discovered by Archbold's gardener. Police suspected that the attempted bombing was precipitated by the execution by firing squad of 'Joe Hill', alias Joseph Hillstrom in Salt Lake City, Utah, the day before. Hill was an IWW member, songwriter and labor organizer who had been convicted of murder.[13]

The Archbold Mausoleum, Sleepy Hollow Cemetery, New York

Death

[edit]

Archbold died of complications from appendicitis in Tarrytown, New York, on December 5, 1916, aged 68.[12][14] He is buried in Sleepy Hollow Cemetery in Sleepy Hollow, New York.

Legacy

[edit]
Main Entrance, Hall of Languages, Syracuse University
  • In 1914, the "John Dustin Archbold College of Liberal Arts" at Syracuse University was renamed in his honor.[15] The entrance to the university's Hall of Languages remains inscribed with this name.
  • The John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, now the Archbold Medical Center, in Thomasville, Georgia, was established in 1925, through a donation by his son, John Foster Archbold.[16]
  • His grandson, John Dana Archbold, was a member of the Board of Trustees of Syracuse University from 1976 to 1993.[3]
  • The John Dana Archbold Theatre at Syracuse Stage (Central New York's only professional theater) is named after his grandson.[17]
  • Another heir, grandson Richard Archbold, established Archbold Biological Station in 1941 on Lake Placid, Florida, land donated by John A. Roebling II.
  • Namesake of the tanker vessel John Dustin Archbold (1914).[18]
  • His grandson, John Dana Archbold (Choate '29), is the namesake of Archbold House, a dormitory and the admissions building of Choate Rosemary Hall. It also houses the Head of School and Associate Head of School's offices. The building was built in 1928 using funds donated by J. Dustin's daughter and J. Dana's mother Anne Saunders Archbold, and it originally served as an infirmary.[19][20][21]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

John Dustin Archbold

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
John Dustin Archbold (July 26, 1848 – December 5, 1916) was an American oil industrialist and who began his career in the oil fields in 1864 and rose to prominence as a key executive in the organization. After his small refining company was acquired by in 1875, he collaborated closely with John D. and William Rockefeller, eventually becoming a director in 1892, vice president in 1899, and president of the of from 1911 until his death following the trust's dissolution. Archbold emphasized operational efficiency and waste reduction in petroleum refining and distribution, contributing to the company's dominance in the industry. A devout Methodist, he directed substantial philanthropy toward and , most notably donating millions to , where he joined the board of trustees in 1886, served as its president from 1893, and funded major facilities including .

Early Life

Birth and Family Background

John Dustin Archbold was born on July 26, 1848, in Leesburg, . He was the son of Reverend Israel Archbold, a Methodist Episcopal minister of Irish and English descent, and Frances Foster Dana. Archbold's father died during his childhood, leaving the family in near destitution and unable to provide adequately for its members. With his two elder brothers having left home and unable to contribute, young Archbold assumed primary financial responsibility for his mother and a younger sister, performing odd jobs while pursuing education in local public schools. This early experience of self-reliance amid hardship shaped his subsequent approach to business and .

Initial Business Ventures

Archbold entered the oil industry in 1864 at the age of sixteen, relocating from to the booming fields near Titusville in northwestern , where he initially labored in the nascent sector following his father's death five years earlier. By 1867, his earnings from this work enabled him to purchase a home for his mother in , demonstrating early financial acumen amid the volatile early oil boom. Over the subsequent years, Archbold transitioned from manual labor to independent operations in oil production and , accumulating capital through small-scale investments in the competitive fields. He established himself as a refiner and crude oil buyer, building a modest in , which laid the groundwork for his subsequent ventures before integration with larger entities. This period of self-reliant entrepreneurship, spanning roughly 1864 to 1875, honed his expertise in processes during an era of rapid and cutthroat in the industry.

Professional Career in Oil

Formation of Acme Oil Company

John Dustin Archbold entered the oil industry in 1864 at age 16, initially working as a for a major oil dealer in the Oil Creek region near Titusville. By the early 1870s, he had founded the Acme Oil Company in Titusville as an independent refining and crude oil purchasing operation, serving as its president. The firm processed local crude into and lubricants amid intense from hundreds of small refiners exploiting the post-1859 , with Archbold's home base in Titusville by reflecting his established position among the region's younger but effective operators. Acme's business model emphasized efficient acquisition of crude from producers and rapid to meet demand for illuminants, navigating challenges like volatile prices and limited transportation reliant on wagons, barges, and emerging pipelines. Archbold's positioned the company as a notable player in the independent sector, though its scale remained modest compared to Cleveland-based consolidators. The venture's success stemmed from Archbold's hands-on experience in buying and , honed over nearly a in the fields, enabling Acme to thrive until external pressures from railroad rebates and mergers altered the landscape. In 1875, acquired Acme Oil Company, absorbing its assets and operations into the growing trust while retaining Archbold as a director, which facilitated his transition to a key executive role. This integration reflected broader patterns of consolidation in the industry, where independents like Acme faced disadvantages in securing favorable shipping rates, prompting sales to entities like Standard that controlled refining capacity exceeding 20% of national output by the mid-1870s.

Integration into Standard Oil

John Dustin Archbold, having established the Acme Oil Company in , as an independent refiner, initially criticized 's aggressive expansion tactics. In 1875, acquired Acme, marking Archbold's entry into the Rockefeller organization; he assumed roles as director and vice president, leveraging his operational expertise in refining. This integration positioned Acme as a nominally independent entity under Standard's control, with Archbold publicly denying any direct ties during investigations while serving as a Standard director—a that obscured the trust's influence over regional . Archbold's involvement facilitated secretive negotiations that consolidated Standard's dominance, including rebates and supply agreements with railroads and producers. By 1882, amid the formation of the Trust to centralize control over its sprawling affiliates, Archbold emerged as one of the nine original trustees, second only to in influence; he received a dated April 5, 1882, reflecting his stake in the $70 million entity. This structure enabled efficient management of refining capacity, which reached 91% of U.S. production by the early , though it drew antitrust scrutiny for restraining competition.

Executive Leadership and Operational Innovations

Upon joining Standard Oil following the acquisition of his Acme Oil Refinery in 1874, John Dustin Archbold was appointed a director and in 1875, positions he held until the trust's dissolution in 1911. In this capacity, he directed refining operations and product distribution, leveraging his prior experience as a refiner in Oil Creek to prioritize cost stabilization and process improvements. Archbold's approach emphasized reducing waste in petroleum refining and transportation, aligning with the company's broader efficiencies such as byproduct utilization and optimized barrel production, though specific technical innovations attributable solely to him remain undocumented in primary accounts. As gradually withdrew from active management after 1897, Archbold emerged as the primary operational leader of , overseeing day-to-day execution amid expanding antitrust scrutiny. He collaborated with a small executive committee—including figures like Henry H. Rogers—to coordinate specialized functions such as manufacturing, exports, and , implementing a divisional structure that enhanced internal decision-making and scalability for the trust's 91 percent control of U.S. refining by 1904. This organizational refinement allowed to maintain pricing discipline and supply chain reliability, even as competitors proliferated, by centralizing rebate negotiations and pipeline investments under his guidance. Archbold's tenure as de facto chief executive extended through the trust era, during which he navigated market volatility by enforcing uniform operational standards across affiliates, contributing to sustained margins despite fluctuating crude prices. Following the U.S. Supreme Court-mandated breakup, he briefly served as president of a successor entity until his death in 1916, ensuring transitional continuity in core refining practices. His leadership, while criticized in contemporaneous investigative reports for aggressive tactics, demonstrably advanced 's vertical , reducing per-barrel costs from over $1 in the to fractions thereof by the early through methodical oversight rather than radical invention.

Hepburn Committee Investigation

In 1879, the New York State Legislature appointed the Select Committee on Railroads, chaired by A. Barton Hepburn, to investigate discriminatory freight rates and secret rebates granted by railroads to major shippers, particularly in the petroleum industry. The probe centered on how railroads like the New York Central and Erie favored Standard Oil Company through drawbacks and rebates, enabling it to secure rates as low as 10 to 25 cents per barrel on refined oil shipments while competitors paid 80 cents or more, effectively subsidizing Standard's dominance. These practices, legal under prevailing contracts but deemed abusive by the committee, allowed Standard to control over 90 percent of U.S. oil refining by the late 1870s. John Dustin Archbold, then president of the Acme Oil Company—a Cleveland-based refiner handling significant volumes of products—was subpoenaed to testify in 1879. Archbold initially maintained that Acme operated independently of , denying any organizational ties or shared control to portray it as a competitive entity marketing its own refined products. Under rigorous by members, however, he acknowledged serving as a director of the Trust, revealing Acme as one of several "independent" firms secretly affiliated with Standard through stock ownership and operational directives. This admission underscored Standard's strategy of using proxy companies to evade scrutiny while consolidating , as Acme's output was largely funneled through Standard's pipeline and distribution networks. Archbold's responses, described by contemporaries as characteristically reserved and non-committal, mirrored the pattern of obfuscation from other Standard executives, prompting the to label their testimonies as "evasive" and insufficiently forthcoming on rebate details. The Hepburn 's majority report, submitted on February 27, 1880, excoriated the rebate system for distorting competition and recommended prohibiting such arrangements, though New York enacted only modest regulations in response, with broader federal reforms delayed until the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887. The investigation, while not resulting in immediate dissolution of Standard's advantages, amplified public outrage over its practices and laid groundwork for subsequent antitrust actions, with Archbold's exposure of hidden affiliations exemplifying the trust's opaque structure.

Theodore Roosevelt Campaign Involvement

In 1904, John D. Archbold, as vice president of , authorized and facilitated substantial financial contributions from the company to the 's presidential campaign fund, supporting incumbent President 's reelection bid. Archbold personally delivered a check for $100,000 to Cornelius N. Bliss, treasurer of the , on June 25, 1904, with assurances from Bliss that the funds would be handled appropriately for campaign purposes. Additional contributions from brought the total to approximately $125,000, directed through figures close to Roosevelt, including , who served as both campaign treasurer and Roosevelt's of and Labor. These transactions came under scrutiny in 1912 during hearings by the House Banking and Currency Committee, chaired by Arsène Pujo, investigating concentrations of financial power and political influence. Archbold testified on August 23, 1912, confirming the $100,000 payment to Bliss and subsequent funds, while maintaining that the contributions were voluntary and not conditioned on policy favors. Leaked correspondence from Archbold to Republican senators, such as Boies Penrose of Pennsylvania, revealed offers of campaign funds in exchange for legislative support, fueling allegations that Standard Oil sought to mitigate antitrust pressures amid Roosevelt's ongoing investigations into the company. Roosevelt vehemently denied any personal knowledge of the contributions' sources or any , asserting in public statements that practices of the era were standard and that his administration's actions against trusts remained unimpaired. Despite the revelations, which opponents leveraged during the election to question Roosevelt's progressive credentials, no direct evidence emerged linking Roosevelt to bribery, and his trust-busting record—including the 1906 regulating railroads and the 1911 antitrust dissolution of —undermined claims of undue influence. Archbold's testimony, while exposing the scale of corporate political giving, did not result in legal charges against him or Standard Oil executives for the 1904 donations, though it intensified public debate over reform.

Antitrust Proceedings and Standard Oil Dissolution

The U.S. Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit against Standard Oil Company of New Jersey and affiliated entities on November 15, 1906, alleging violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 through the company's trust structure, which purportedly created an unreasonable restraint of trade in petroleum refining, transportation, and distribution since approximately 1870. As vice president and the active operational head of Standard Oil—particularly after John D. Rockefeller's semi-retirement around 1897—John D. Archbold oversaw day-to-day management, including responses to regulatory scrutiny, and was identified by contemporaries as the company's primary executive figure during the proceedings. Archbold's leadership involved coordinating legal defenses that emphasized operational efficiencies and economies of scale achieved through vertical integration, though these arguments failed to persuade the courts that the trust's dominance, which controlled over 90% of U.S. oil refining by the late 1880s, resulted from superior business practices rather than coercive tactics. The case proceeded to trial in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, where Standard Oil's defense strategy included from executives on historical growth metrics; Archbold himself provided evidence indicating the company's refining capacity had expanded from about 10% of the U.S. total in 1870 to a dominant share by 1888, attributing this to innovations in refining processes and pipeline networks rather than predation. Although anticipated as a key witness due to his intimate knowledge of internal operations—including rebate agreements with railroads and acquisitions of competitors—Archbold's direct courtroom appearances were limited; in related proceedings, such as a 1909 retrial involving of , the company stipulated facts to obviate his , admitting details on freight car movements and that had been contested. The district court ruled against Standard Oil in 1909, finding the combination illegal per se, but the U.S. , in its May 15, 1911, decision (Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. , 221 U.S. 1), introduced the "" doctrine, evaluating restraints based on their reasonableness under precedents, yet still deemed the trust's structure an undue restraint warranting dissolution. Following the Supreme Court's mandate, the Trust was dissolved by a federal decree effective in early , breaking the entity into 34 independent companies to restore competition in the oil industry. Archbold transitioned seamlessly to lead the largest successor, of (predecessor to Exxon), serving as its president from 1911 until his death in 1916, during which the company maintained significant market influence through retained assets like refineries and marketing networks. This post-dissolution role underscored Archbold's enduring executive stature, as the splintered firms collectively preserved much of Standard Oil's prior efficiencies and profitability, with Jersey Standard's value appreciating substantially in subsequent years despite the breakup's intent to curb monopoly power.

Philanthropic Endeavors

Contributions to

John D. Archbold joined the Board of Trustees in 1886 and served as its chairman from 1893 until his death in 1916. Over his lifetime, he donated nearly $4 million to the institution, funding infrastructure expansions and alleviating financial pressures that enabled its growth into a prominent university. In March 1905, Archbold pledged $600,000—the largest gift to an at that time—for , a 20,000-seat concrete arena completed in 1908 that positioned Syracuse as a leader in collegiate athletics. He also financed Archbold Gymnasium after donating $300,000 in 1909 to retire the mortgage on the Block , facilitating its construction as a 150-by-210-foot facility. Additionally, his gifts supported the erection of Sims Hall, a men's . Archbold's philanthropy addressed operational shortfalls, including a $25,000 contribution in June 1912 toward erasing the university's $60,000 current expense deficit. He further aided developments like Peck Hall with a $10,000 donation and helped retire early debts while funding halls such as Steele Hall. Despite his preference against eponymous naming due to personal humility, multiple facilities honored him in recognition of these transformative contributions.

Broader Charitable Activities

Archbold, a devout Presbyterian, made liberal contributions to religious work and church-related initiatives throughout his life. These efforts reflected his personal faith and commitment to supporting ecclesiastical organizations, though specific amounts and recipients beyond general religious causes remain sparsely documented in primary records. His charitable giving also encompassed smaller donations to various other organizations, aligning with the era's emphasis among industrialists on targeted benevolence rather than broad foundations. Unlike contemporaries such as , who established large-scale philanthropic trusts, Archbold's non-educational donations prioritized personal and community-oriented support without forming dedicated endowments.

Assassination Attempt

On November 19, 1915, a dynamite bomb targeting John D. Archbold was discovered at the entrance to his Cedar Cliff estate in Tarrytown, New York. The device consisted of four one-pound sticks of dynamite, fitted with percussion caps and concealed in the roadway to detonate upon impact from an automobile wheel. Archbold's gardener, John Walquist, uncovered the explosive before it could activate, preventing any detonation or injury. Law enforcement attributed the plot to radicals affiliated with the (IWW), a militant labor organization with anarchist influences, reflecting heightened anti-capitalist animus toward executives amid labor unrest and antitrust scrutiny. No suspects were apprehended, and the assailants' identities remained unresolved, consistent with patterns of unattributed attacks on industrial magnates during the era. The attempt underscored vulnerabilities for figures like Archbold, yet he faced no physical harm and persisted in his leadership role at .

Death

John Dustin Archbold died on December 5, 1916, at his home in , at age 68, due to complications arising from an operation performed on November 23. Despite medical interventions, including blood transfusions administered by attending physicians, he failed to recover from the surgery. At the time of his death, Archbold served as president of the of . He was interred in the Archbold at .

Legacy

Business and Economic Contributions

John Dustin Archbold entered the oil industry in 1864 at age 16, working as a refiner and buyer during the oil boom, before his operations were acquired by Standard Oil precursors. In 1875, he became an agent for the Acme Company, an affiliate of John D. Rockefeller's interests, marking his entry into the orbit. By 1882, Archbold was appointed one of the nine original trustees of the Trust, a structure that centralized control over disparate refining entities and facilitated coordinated expansion. Archbold's ascent continued with his election as a director of Standard Oil in 1892 and appointment as in 1899, positions through which he handled operational management, particularly after Rockefeller's partial withdrawal from daily affairs around 1896. These roles positioned him as the company's operational leader, overseeing refinements in production , waste reduction, and distribution logistics inspired by Rockefeller's principles of stabilization and cost minimization. From 1911 until his death in 1916, Archbold served as president of the of , navigating the entity through the U.S. Supreme Court's 1911 antitrust dissolution while sustaining high dividend payouts to shareholders. Economically, Archbold's management contributed to Standard Oil's sustained dominance, with the trust achieving approximately 90% control of U.S. oil refining capacity by the early 1900s, enabling that initially drove down prices from around 30 cents per gallon in the to under 10 cents by the 1880s through and process innovations. This scale also supported development of by-products like lubricants and fuels, expanding market applications and stabilizing supply chains amid fluctuating crude production. However, post-trust critics attributed sustained high refining margins under Archbold's later leadership to monopoly pricing power rather than ongoing efficiencies.

Historical Assessments and Debates

Historians regard John D. Archbold as 's operational leader from the late 1890s onward, assuming active management as shifted toward , and later becoming president of the reorganized of after the antitrust dissolution. Under his direction, the company maintained high efficiency through , innovations in distribution such as tank cars, and volume-based rebates negotiated with railroads, which lowered prices from 26 cents per gallon in 1870 to 9 cents by 1880. Scholarly debates center on whether Standard Oil's dominance, including under Archbold's tenure, resulted from superior productivity or anticompetitive predation. Progressive-era critics, such as , portrayed executives like Archbold as complicit in conspiratorial rebates and market exclusion, fueling antitrust sentiment that culminated in the Supreme Court's ruling against the trust as an unreasonable . In contrast, economic analyses contend that no evidence supports claims of by ; its market share—peaking at around 90% in refining but declining amid growing competition from firms like Tidewater and Gulf—stemmed from cost reductions and consumer benefits, not coercion, with post-dissolution entities under Archbold's oversight continuing to thrive and innovate. Archbold's strategic political contributions in the late 1890s to favored candidates represent another point of contention, viewed by some as legitimate defense against regulatory overreach and by others as undue corporate influence amid rising federal scrutiny. These efforts, curtailed by 1907 legislation banning corporate donations, highlight debates over Standard Oil's transition to as public opposition grew, yet empirical reviews affirm the company's role in industry maturation without reliance on force or monopoly coercion.

References

  1. https://library.syracuse.edu/digital/guides_sua/html/sua_archbold_jd.htm
  2. https://www.timesgazette.com/2021/03/22/highland-county-oil-tycoon/
  3. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/24252617/john_dustin-archbold
  4. https://www.archbold.org/articles/2025/july/today-in-archbold-history-john-d-archbold-born-i/
  5. https://www.mausoleums.com/portfolio/archbold-mausoleum/
  6. https://www.doddridgecountyroots.com/tng/getperson.php?personID=I109428&tree=dcr
  7. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/60692/60692-h/60692-h.htm
  8. https://www.nytimes.com/1916/12/06/archives/jd-archbold-dies-mourned-by-many-office-boys-and-elevator-men-join.html
  9. https://ari.aynrand.org/issues/government-and-business/capitalism/vindicating-capitalism-the-real-history-of-the-standard-oil-company/
  10. https://www.jalopnik.com/a-brief-history-of-gasoline-how-standard-oil-got-away-1847469742/
  11. http://www.aukevisser.nl/inter-2/id851.htm
  12. https://fee.org/articles/john-d-rockefeller-and-the-oil-industry/
  13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1882746
  14. https://www.americanheritage.com/grand-acquisitor
  15. https://www.nytimes.com/1912/08/24/archives/testimony-of-mr-archbold-says-he-gave-100000-to-cn-bliss-roosevelt.html
  16. https://www.nytimes.com/1912/10/11/archives/rogers-had-receipt-for-archbold-gift-contribution-roosevelt-knew-of.html
  17. https://theodorerooseveltcenter.org/Research/Digital-Library/Record.aspx?libID=o285070
  18. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/221/1
  19. https://www.nytimes.com/1908/11/16/archives/jd-archbold-too-to-be-a-witness-standard-oil-companys-active-head.html
  20. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/466547
  21. https://www.nytimes.com/1909/03/07/archives/archbold-need-not-testify-standard-admits-in-retrial-of-oil-case.html
  22. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/221/1/
  23. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep221/usrep221001/usrep221001.pdf
  24. https://www.acquired.fm/episodes/standard-oil-part-ii
  25. https://library.syracuse.edu/digital/guides/a/archbold_jd.htm
  26. https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=sumagazine
  27. https://www.cnyhistory.org/2015/01/syracuse-university-fires/
  28. https://www.nytimes.com/1912/06/13/archives/25000-from-jd-archbold-aids-syracuse-university-to-reduce-deficit.html
  29. https://library.syracuse.edu/special-collections-research-center/university-archives/buildings/peck-hall/
  30. https://www.nytimes.com/1916/12/19/archives/archbold-millions-all-go-to-family-estate-estimated-as-high-as.html
  31. https://www.nytimes.com/1915/11/22/archives/dynamite-bomb-for-jd-archbold-four-onepound-sticks-found-hidden-in.html
  32. https://markhistorydonovan.blogspot.com/2021/06/cedar-cliff-estate-home-to-rockefellers.html
  33. https://dailyorange.com/2003/09/1916-archbold-dies-after-operation/
  34. https://wellwiki-prod.cloud.arc.gwu.edu/wiki/Standard_Oil
  35. https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=5292
  36. https://www.masterresource.org/free-market-capitalism/standard-oil-part-iv/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.