Hubbry Logo
Mid-majorMid-majorMain
Open search
Mid-major
Community hub
Mid-major
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mid-major
Mid-major
from Wikipedia

Mid-major conferences in American college sports at the NCAA Division I level are athletic conferences that are not among the power conferences. The grouping is most commonly used in men's college basketball to describe conferences outside of the Big Ten, Big 12, SEC, ACC and Big East which have also been referred to as "high majors".

The term "mid-major" was coined in 1977 by Jack Kvancz, the head coach of men's basketball team at Catholic University of America. The NCAA neither acknowledges nor uses the terms "major" or "mid-major" to differentiate between Division I athletic conferences. Some schools and fans consider it offensive and derogatory, while others embrace the term.[1][2][3]

Typically, the title of "mid-major" is not used when discussing College Football. Instead, Division I football conferences and teams are grouped into the FCS, the Group of Six, or the Power Four.

Basketball

[edit]

In college basketball, the term "mid-major" is used to refer to teams that are members of a conference other than the "power conferences" of the Big Ten, Big 12, Big East, SEC, and ACC.[4] The Big East Conference does not sponsor football and thus is not considered a power conference in that sport[a], but is universally considered so in basketball, with the term "Power" sometimes used by media to describe the combination of the power football conferences and Big East.[4] The NCAA has officially recognized this distinction in the selection process for the National Invitation Tournament, as these conferences each receive automatic bids for their two highest-ranked teams not invited to the NCAA Tournament, as ranked by the NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET).[5]

Beyond that, one men's program outside of these conferences, West Coast Conference member Gonzaga, is now generally considered equivalent to a power program despite its mid-major affiliation.[b] ESPN's Kevin Connors currently defines men's basketball mid-majors as "programs outside the top 7 conferences (Power Five, Big East, AAC) and Gonzaga".[7] Another ESPN journalist, Jeff Borzello, referred to Gonzaga in 2022 as a "power conference" program.[8] ESPN is not the only major media outlet that does not consider Gonzaga men's basketball to be a mid-major program; CBS Sports journalist Matt Norlander, in his 2022–23 season preview of mid-major conferences and programs, explicitly called Gonzaga "not a mid-major".[9] In 2022, Gonzaga was reportedly in preliminary membership talks with three Power Six conferences—the Big East, Big 12, and Pac-12;[10] after the Pac-12 lost all but two of its members (Oregon State and Washington State) in 2024, Gonzaga would accept membership in the reimagined Pac-12 effective in 2026–27.[11]

Given the sustained success of many so-called "mid-major" conferences, and especially that of the Gonzaga program, higher profile conferences find it more difficult to distinguish themselves with the "mid-major" and "major" labels, unless one takes into account the distinction of being in now-defunct BCS football playing conference.[opinion] However, only one team from what is now a mid-major conference has won a national championship since the tournament expanded to 64 teams—UNLV in 1990 as a member of the Big West Conference.[c] (Louisville won national titles in 1980 and 1986 as a member of the Metro Conference, one of the precursors to Conference USA and arguably a major basketball conference of that day.)[citation needed]

Football

[edit]

Because of the development of the now-defunct Bowl Championship Series in 1998, and the lack of a playoff format for the Football Bowl Subdivision prior to the College Football Playoff, the demarcation line between major and mid-major conferences is much clearer in college football than in other sports. The six conferences of the BCS each had guaranteed appearances in one of the four major bowl games (Rose Bowl, Fiesta Bowl, Orange Bowl, and Sugar Bowl), whereas mid-majors — the teams that were not in one of those six leagues — relied on an at-large bid or a high ranking to qualify for a major bowl. (The Notre Dame Fighting Irish football team, an independent, was an exception due to being a member of the ACC in all other sports with the exception of men's hockey in which it is a member of the Big Ten.) It was rare for any mid-major program to receive one of two at-large bids (or only one, if Notre Dame qualified) to one of the four major bowls, even if such a program completed a perfect season. The establishment of the BCS National Championship Game opened two additional at-large berths and mandated invites for mid-major schools above a certain ranking, which led to an increase in mid-major appearances in the four major bowls. Then conference realignment brought about the split of the Big East football conference. Schools that did not join a major conference from the Big East renamed it the American Athletic Conference, now the American Conference (American), while several non-football schools left and founded a new conference, purchasing the "Big East" name from the newly renamed American. With the advent of the College Football Playoff in 2014, the non-Power Five FBS conferences are usually referred to as "Group of Five" conferences rather than mid-majors. No mid-major ever qualified for the BCS title game.

Only one mid-major team has won a national championship: the BYU Cougars, then in the Western Athletic Conference, won the 1984 championship on the strength of their perfect record and win in the 1984 Holiday Bowl. BYU largely won the championship by default, since no other team had held an undefeated record, and there were still lingering doubts about the team deserving the honor because it was in a lesser conference. Since the establishment of the Bowl Alliance (and its successors the Bowl Championship Series and College Football Playoff), no mid-major team had ever been selected for the championship game or tournament until the 2021 Cincinnati Bearcats, then of the American, were selected after an unbeaten regular season, becoming the only mid-major team to play in the CFP during its four-team era. The Bearcats were defeated in the opening (semifinal) round 27–6 by the Alabama Crimson Tide. In the first season of the 12-team CFP in 2024, Mountain West Conference member Boise State received a first-round bye as one of the four highest-ranked conference champions in the final CFP rankings.

Currently, the Group of Five football conferences are the American Conference (known as the American Athletic Conference before the 2025 season), Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, and the Sun Belt Conference. After the 2024 collapse of the Pac-12 Conference, that league has often been included with the other non-power conferences in a notional "Group of Six". Several conferences that no longer sponsor football were considered mid-majors; two that existed in the BCS era were the Big West Conference and the Western Athletic Conference (which resumed football competition in the Football Championship Subdivision in 2021 and is a partner in the FCS football-only United Athletic Conference (football) through the 2025 season, after which the WAC will rebrand as the UAC).

Mid-major schools have compiled a record of 9–7 in the major bowl games since the 2004 football season. Since 2004, only the 2005 and 2011 seasons did not see a mid-major team in one of the major bowl games. The 2010 Fiesta Bowl featured two unbeaten mid-majors (Boise State and TCU); this is the only time two mid-majors have qualified for top-tier bowls. Prior to 2012, each of these teams entered its bowl undefeated, until Northern Illinois qualified following the 2012 season. UCF qualified for the January 2014 Fiesta Bowl (following the 2013 season), in the final year of the BCS, because the American Athletic Conference retained the Big East's automatic slot in the BCS. The current arrangement of the New Year's Six bowl games mandates that the highest-ranked Group of Five conference champion be awarded a New Year's Six bowl berth. This has been most recently invoked for the 2021 Cotton Bowl Classic, which featured a Cincinnati team that became the first Group of Five team to be selected to a College Football Playoff semifinal. The 2018 season saw a controversy that also involved UCF, which went on to win the 2018 Peach Bowl and end the season as the only undefeated FBS team. The Knights were denied a CFP bid in favor of four teams which had all lost one game (two of which, Georgia and Alabama, had lost by double digits to the same Auburn team that UCF had defeated in the Peach Bowl).[12]

Date played Winning team Losing team Bowl Game
January 1, 2005 #5 Utah 35 #19 Pittsburgh 7 2005 Fiesta Bowl
January 1, 2007 #9 Boise State 43 #7 Oklahoma 42 (OT) 2007 Fiesta Bowl
January 1, 2008 #5 Georgia 41 #10 Hawaiʻi 10 2008 Sugar Bowl
January 2, 2009 #6 Utah 31 #4 Alabama 17 2009 Sugar Bowl
January 4, 2010 #6 Boise State 17 #3 TCU 10 2010 Fiesta Bowl
January 1, 2011 #3 TCU 21 #4 Wisconsin 19 2011 Rose Bowl
January 1, 2013 #13 Florida State 31 #16 Northern Illinois 10 2013 Orange Bowl
December 31, 2014 #20 Boise State 38 #10 Arizona 30 2014 Fiesta Bowl (December)
December 31, 2015 #18 Houston 38 #9 Florida State 24 2015 Peach Bowl
January 2, 2017 #8 Wisconsin 24 #12 Western Michigan 16 2017 Cotton Bowl Classic
January 1, 2018 #12 UCF 34 #7 Auburn 27 2018 Peach Bowl
January 1, 2019 #11 LSU 40 #7 UCF 32 2019 Fiesta Bowl
December 28, 2019 #13 Penn State 53 #15 Memphis 39 2019 Cotton Bowl Classic
January 1, 2021 #9 Georgia 24 #8 Cincinnati 21 2021 Peach Bowl
December 31, 2021 #1 Alabama 27 #4 Cincinnati 6 2021 Cotton Bowl Classic
January 2, 2023 #16 Tulane 46 #10 USC 45 2023 Cotton Bowl Classic
January 1, 2024 #8 Oregon 45 #23 Liberty 6 2024 Fiesta Bowl (January)
December 31, 2024 #4 Penn State 31 #9 Boise State 14 2024 Fiesta Bowl (December)

The American Conference and Mountain West Conference have so far been the most successful of the Group of Five at placing their champions in major bowls, respectively doing so eight and six times. However, four of the MW's appearances were in the BCS era, when the conference now operating as the American was known as the Big East and was a primary BCS partner. The Western Athletic Conference, which no longer sponsors FBS football,[d] has done so three times; both schools which went to major bowls as WAC champions now play football in the MW. The Mid-American Conference has done so once in the BCS era and once in the CFP era, and Conference USA has done so once in the CFP era. The Sun Belt Conference has never qualified a champion for a BCS or New Year's Six bowl. The only team from the group conferences to have reached a major bowl since the 2024 expansion of the CFP is the aforementioned 2024 Boise State team (MW); the American and SBC each qualified one team to the 2025 CFP.

The mid-major team that has qualified for the most major bowl games is Boise State with four appearances, twice each in the WAC and MW. UCF qualified three times while in the American. Cincinnati, TCU, and Utah have each done so twice.[e] Cincinnati, TCU, UCF, and Utah are now members of "power conferences"—TCU is now in the Big 12, qualified for the 2014 Peach Bowl and played for the national championship following the 2022 season while there; Utah, which joined the Pac-12 in 2011 and moved to the Big 12 in 2024, played in the Rose Bowl in 2022 and 2023; and Cincinnati and UCF joined the Big 12 in 2023.

Before the 2023 departure of Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF for the Big 12, the American was widely considered the best football conference that is not in the Power 5. Since its reorganization and split from the Big East Conference in 2013 (and its corresponding expulsion from "BCS conference" status), they have sent five programs to New Year's Six bowl games: Houston in 2015, UCF in 2013, 2017, and 2018, Memphis in 2019, Cincinnati in 2020 and 2021, and Tulane in 2022. These programs have gone 4–4 in the games played to date. USF, UCF, Houston, Navy, Cincinnati, SMU, and Memphis, all either current or former American Conference teams, are very successful programs in FBS play. In 2017, UCF was the first team from the American to go undefeated; its schedule included two wins against Memphis (whose only two regular season losses came to UCF and was otherwise undefeated) and a win against USF (which had only one other loss besides UCF), and the team won its bowl game against #7 Auburn, a team which had beaten both CFP championship game teams (Alabama and Georgia) that year. The Knights also completed an unbeaten regular season in 2018, but lost to LSU in their bowl game after having lost McKenzie Milton, the quarterback who had led them in both 2017 and 2018, to a catastrophic knee injury in their final regularly scheduled game. Cincinnati also entered its bowl games unbeaten in both 2020 and 2021, but lost both times, narrowly to Georgia in 2020 and more convincingly to Alabama in 2021. However, Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF joined the Big 12 in 2023,[13] and SMU joined the ACC in 2024.[14]

The bowl game to host the most mid-major conference champions is the Fiesta Bowl, which has hosted at least one such team eight times, with the 2010 edition (2009 season) involving two mid-majors. The Cotton Bowl Classic has featured a mid-major champion four times, and the Peach Bowl has done so three times, with all such games for both bowls taking place in the CFP era. The Sugar Bowl did so twice in the BCS era. The Rose Bowl Game and Orange Bowl each did so once in the BCS era.[15]

Swimming

[edit]

Since 2002, CollegeSwimming.com has produced an objective ranking system for Mid-Major, Division I swimming programs. Initiated by Clark Campbell, the poll has been used to provide attention to teams that were often targeted for elimination ostensibly for Title IX or budgetary reasons. Swimming, along with most other NCAA sports, fundamentally differs in its financial model from the so-called "revenue sports" of basketball and Division I FBS football. The NCAA classifies the latter two sports as "head-count" sports, which means that the total number of players that can receive any athletically related financial aid from the school is limited. Because a partial scholarship counts fully against the head count, it means that in practice, scholarships are almost always awarded as full grants-in-aid. On the other hand, the NCAA classifies swimming as an "equivalency" sport, meaning that scholarships can be divided among a number of student-athletes. CollegeSwimming.com's definition of a mid-major institution takes this into account. Though the lineup has changed, institutions eligible for the CollegeSwimming.com poll are those institutions that a) are not members of a Power Five conference, American Athletic Conference, Mountain West Conference, or Western Athletic Conference; or b) provide fewer than one-half of the allowable scholarships under the NCAA rules.

Past Champions Women Men
2016-17 Yale University

University of Denver (tie)

Harvard University
2015-16 Harvard University University of Denver
2014-15 Princeton University San Diego State University
2013-14 Harvard University San Diego State University
2012-13 Harvard University Harvard University
2011-12 Princeton University Ohio University
2010-11 United States Naval Academy Princeton University
2009-10 Eastern Michigan Princeton University
2008-09 United States Naval Academy Harvard University
2007-08 United States Naval Academy Harvard University
2006-07 Princeton University Harvard University
2005-06 Princeton University Harvard University
2004-05 Missouri State UC-Irvine
2003-04 Eastern Michigan Miami University (OH)

Current Poll[16]

Key conferences

[edit]

As a convenient shorthand, the term "high major" basketball conference is often synonymous with the college football Power Four conferences:

These leagues, along with the Big East and the since-decimated Pac-12 Conference, were the six so-called AQ ("automatic qualifying") conferences during the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) era in college football. Following the breakup of the Big East and end of the BCS era, the remaining five are the primary members of the College Football Playoff (CFP) structure that began in the 2014 season. The CFP is centered around a group of bowl games often called the "New Year's Six", with two of them hosting CFP semifinals each season in rotation. Football champions of these conferences are assured of a spot in a "New Year's Six" game, though not necessarily in a CFP semifinal.

In 2024, the CFP was expanded to 12 teams, with one berth guaranteed to the highest-rated team among the non-power conferences. The following year saw a five-loss Duke team win the ACC title, leading to a second Group of Six team, James Madison, making the CFP alongside the highest-ranked G6 champion, Tulane.

The two leagues that resulted from the 2013 split of the original Big East Conference—the football-sponsoring American Conference and non-football Big East Conference—are often considered to be major basketball conferences as well. When the original league split along football lines, the seven non-FBS schools, plus Creighton, Butler, and Xavier, founded the current Big East while the three remaining FBS schools, Cincinnati, UConn, and Temple, became The American. In every year since the split, the "new" Big East has been ranked a top five basketball conference by leading analysts such as Ken Pomeroy. Villanova won the men's basketball national championship in the 2015-2016 and 2017–18 seasons. The American has also found success, consistently ranking a top ten league. In the 2013–14 season, the first after the split, American member UConn won national titles in both men's and women's basketball. The American also includes several other historically major men's programs such as Cincinnati, Houston, Memphis, and Temple.[17] UConn eventually left The American in 2020 to reunite with many of its historic rivals in the current Big East, and has since won men's national championships in 2023 and 2024. Cincinnati and Houston also eventually left The American for the Big 12 Conference in 2023.

The term "mid-major" is sometimes used to describe all of the other 25 basketball-playing conferences not receiving automatic tie-ins to either the BCS or CFP. However, most of the time the term is specifically applied only to the non-CFP conferences that consistently produce quality NCAA Tournament teams (distinguishing them from the "low-major" conferences). Often the definition of a "mid-major" is a conference that garners only one bid to the NCAA tournament (its automatic bid, won by its conference tournament winner) and no at large bids, all the while not garnering the attention and television dollars of a major conference.

Until the last decade, the Atlantic 10, Conference USA, the Mountain West Conference, and the Western Athletic Conference were widely considered to be high-major conferences but a step below the level of the six BCS conferences. However, due to recent changes in membership in some conferences, as well as the sustained success of some "mid-major" conferences, most no longer consider the Atlantic 10 and Mountain West to be below the level of the CFP conferences in college basketball. One reason why is the 2012–2013 RPI (a rating used by the tournament selection committee), which in 2012–13 ranked the Mountain West as the third best conference in Division I (ahead of the ACC, Big 12, Pac-12, and SEC) and the Atlantic 10 seventh (ahead of the SEC). The strength of these two non-CFP conferences in men's college basketball in 2012–13 was not an aberration, given that in 2011–12 the Mountain West finished the year ranked fifth, and the Atlantic 10 ranked seventh, both ahead of the Pac-12. Given the rankings of these two leagues, as well as their prestige, performance, recent post-season results, national perception, exposure, attendance, and many other factors, most observers have trouble considering certain non-CFP conferences as "mid-majors".[18][19]

So-called "mid-major" basketball programs generally belong to one of the following twenty-four conferences. Note that some of these conferences, including the Mountain West and the Atlantic 10, may be considered a "high-major" as opposed to a mid-major depending on whom one asks.[20][21][22][23][24][25]

Conference USA, the WAC, and the American Conference all once had many strong basketball programs, but since 1999 WAC men's basketball has dropped in prestige due to the departure of many members. CUSA has lost members mainly to the pre-2013 Big East, the American, and the Sun Belt Conference. In turn, the American has lost five significant basketball brands since the 2013 Big East split—Louisville to the ACC and Rutgers to the Big Ten in 2014, UConn to the current Big East in 2020, ans Cincinnati and Houston to the Big 12 in 2023.

This list is not static from year to year, as many fail to agree which conferences are truly the majors and which are the mid-majors and/or low-majors during any given season. (The Big West and Ohio Valley Conference were previously included on this list; they finished the 2011–2012 season as the 21st and 25th, respectively, ranked conferences in the RPI.) Some still refuse to consider the Mountain West to be a "major" conference, despite outperforming several other "major" (BCS) conferences for the last several years in a row. There are many conferences (besides the six BCS conferences) that have regularly had teams advance to the Sweet Sixteen or beyond, regularly challenge for multiple NCAA Tournament bids, have multiple teams "buy" games from lower-ranked conferences, and have finished in the top 10 in conference attendance every year for the last decade.[26] Additionally, as noted previously, Gonzaga is now seen as a major program despite its mid-major conference affiliation.

The basketball website Collegeinsider.com created its own definition of "mid-major" when it introduced a pair of end-of-season awards for outstanding mid-major individuals in college basketball: the Lou Henson Award for players (first presented in 2010) and Hugh Durham Award for coaches (first presented in 2005). Since the 2013–14 season, players and coaches from the following conferences have been ineligible for these awards:

  • All conferences that sponsor FBS football, except for the MAC and Sun Belt
  • Atlantic 10
  • Big East

Additionally, although Collegeinsider.com continues to include Gonzaga in its unofficial "Mid-Major Top 25" when warranted, it apparently no longer considers Gonzaga to be eligible for its "mid-major" awards. For example, in 2020–21, Gonzaga had no representatives on the Lou Henson All-America Team, consisting of the 25 players on the final watchlist for the Henson Award.[27] This was despite three Gonzaga players (Corey Kispert, Jalen Suggs, Drew Timme) being consensus All-Americans in that season.

Members of these conferences were also generally ineligible for CollegeInsider.com Postseason Tournament, and remain so for that event's effective successor, The Basketball Classic.

In Division I women's basketball, the analytics website Her Hoop Stats created a similar definition of "mid-major" when it introduced the Becky Hammon Mid-Major Player of the Year Award in 2020. Currently, players from the Power Four conferences, plus the Big East, are ineligible for this award.[28]

Issues mid-major programs face

[edit]

Mid-major teams often have a difficult time scheduling major conference opponents, especially at home.[29] Major conference teams usually will not schedule a high quality mid-major team, knowing that there is an uncomfortably high chance that they will lose (especially if the game is at the mid-major team's home court) and if the major team does win, there is often little benefit in media exposure for beating a non-major school. Some major conference teams also believe that scheduling games with additional competitive teams isn't necessary for their current team's development, as they believe there will be enough "tough games" during conference play. This phenomenon often manifests itself in major squads playing mostly lower ranked mid-major conference teams (while refusing schedule requests from better mid-major squads) in their out-of-conference schedules,[30] thereby establishing very impressive records against lesser foes and bypassing higher quality mid-major teams in the process.

In recent years, the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee has stressed the importance of a team's strength of schedule (SOS) in the nonconference portion of their schedule. Teams with a low-ranked nonconference SOS have often been penalized in their seeding and in some cases not selected for the tournament at all. In 2006, Florida State was left out of the tournament field in large part because[citation needed] its out-of-conference schedule was rated #316 out of 333 Division I teams.

The difficulty most mid-majors have in scheduling major conference opponents has a large effect on their ability to qualify for the NCAA basketball championship tournament and for the National Invitation Tournament. Often, mid-major teams with outstanding records are passed over for at-large berths in the NCAA Tournament in favor of teams from BCS conferences with mediocre records, based partly on the fact that the mid-major teams often have a lower strength of schedule. Without the ability to play more "major" opponents, most mid-majors have to stake their Tournament hopes on winning their conference's season-ending tournament (which promises an automatic berth in the NCAA Tournament) since the possibility of an at-large bid is often remote. Mid-majors that do make it into the tournament by winning their conference tournament are regularly placed in the lowest seeds (four of the eight play-in game seeds are reserved for mid-major conference champions), which effectively ensures they will be eliminated from the tournament quickly because they will have to face the strongest teams in the tournament in their first game. (Only one play-in game participant has ever defeated a 1 seed, when Fairleigh Dickinson defeated Purdue in 2023; it was not until 2018 that any 16 seed had ever defeated a 1 seed.) To expand opportunities for mid-majors to play postseason basketball, some unofficial postseason tournaments have arisen, including the aforementioned CollegeInsider.com tournament and the College Basketball Invitational; however, as most of the schools are smaller, they may not be able to afford the entry fees for these pay-to-play tournaments, and a number of mid-major schools have policies prohibiting play in them.

The Gonzaga Bulldogs face a slightly different set of challenges. Since its Elite Eight appearance in 1999, it has successfully established itself as the closest thing to a major program in a mid-major conference, making the tournament field in every year since, even in years it failed to win the West Coast Conference tournament. Its position in a mid-major conference is no longer a primary issue with regard to making the tournament field, but is often perceived to adversely affect its tournament seeding. The Bulldogs typically play a nationally competitive nonconference schedule, frequently going on the road, and have proven themselves capable of defeating nationally prominent opponents. However, the relative weakness of the West Coast Conference (WCC) hurts Gonzaga's strength of schedule, which in turn lowers the Bulldogs' Ratings Percentage Index (RPI) (an important numerical criterion in tournament selection). Gonzaga's challenges were similar to those faced by Nevada-Las Vegas under Jerry Tarkanian, whose Running Rebels dominated a relatively weak Big West Conference (formerly the Pacific Coast Athletic Association) from 1974 to 1992.

Some mid-major teams are now preferring to play "home" games in larger nearby arenas. Gonzaga uses the Spokane Arena in its home city or Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle for these larger-audience games. Some mid-major and major conference teams have made the use of non-campus arenas permanent. Saint Bonaventure University, one of the smallest colleges in Division I, has regularly played games at Blue Cross Arena in Rochester and KeyBank Center in Buffalo.

The NCAA tournament selection for the 2006 men's tournament was surrounded by controversy related to mid-major programs. A number of teams from mid-major conferences had unprecedented success in the non-conference portions of their schedule, and were therefore ranked highly in the RPI throughout the season. A change in the NCAA's RPI rating process prior to the 2005 season also improved many of these teams' chances by changing from a formula that treated home and road wins and losses equally, to a formula that gave higher weight to road games. Because many BCS conference teams played no more than one or two non-conference games away from home, there was a de facto bolstering of RPI ratings for many mid-major teams, leading to speculation about how this "new" version of the RPI would be used in the selection process by the NCAA tournament selection committee. In spite of a new precedent being set by the committee by leaving the highest ranked RPI team ever, #21 Missouri State of the Missouri Valley Conference, out of the tournament field, some mid-majors with strong RPI's received at-large bids over lower-ranked BCS conference teams.[31] This prompted harsh criticism from sports writers and coaches of BCS conference teams that did not receive bids. This criticism flew in the face of the fact that the six BCS conferences still received more bids (32) from the committee than in most past years. The mid-major conference teams that were selected went on to silence those critics when a record number (five) advanced to the "Sweet 16". Even more significantly, one of those teams, George Mason, then of the Colonial Athletic Association (now known as the Coastal Athletic Association), made it to the Final Four. In both the 2008 and 2009 NCAA tournaments, mid-major Siena had a strong showing, advancing to the second round with wins over Vanderbilt and Ohio State respectively. In the 2010 NCAA Division I men's basketball tournament, the Butler University Bulldogs reached the Final Four, becoming the 3rd mid-major to make the Final Four in the modern (1985–present) era. On April 3, they beat Michigan State of the Big Ten Conference to become the second mid-major to reach the national championship game since 1998.

The 2011 NCAA Division I men's basketball tournament was the first time since the tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985 that two mid-majors met in the Final Four. The Butler University Bulldogs returned for their second consecutive appearance after winning the Southeast Regional in New Orleans as a #8 seed. The Virginia Commonwealth University Rams of the Colonial Athletic Association advanced to their first Final Four appearance after winning the Southwest Regional in San Antonio as a #11 seed. VCU became the first team in history to win five games to reach the Final Four, winning the First Four round in its inaugural year. VCU tied LSU in 1986 and fellow CAA team, George Mason, in 2006 as the highest seed to reach the Final Four (#11). The previous time two mid-majors advanced to the same Final Four was the 1979 NCAA Division I men's basketball tournament, when Indiana State of the Missouri Valley and Penn of the Ivy League qualified.[32] Butler is no longer a mid-major due to its membership in the Big East since 2013. VCU has since joined the Atlantic 10, where it has consistently been among the top teams, even following the departure of coach Shaka Smart for Texas in 2015, and his successor, Will Wade, for LSU in 2017. George Mason is now also an Atlantic 10 member.

Mid-major basketball teams also face significant disadvantages when it comes to resources to spend on recruiting, marketing, and operations, including coaches' salaries. Mid-major basketball blogger Kyle Whellison, who describes as mid-major any team from a conference where average total spending on men's basketball programs is less than $2 million and average total spending on all athletic programs is less than $20 million, notes that teams from major conferences win games against teams from mid-major conferences roughly 84 percent of the time.

In unusual cases, teams may have reputations as mid-majors even if they participate in major conference. An example of this is Saint Bonaventure, one of the smallest universities in Division I; the Bonnies have been a member of the Atlantic 10 Conference (in which it has been a consistent contender under current coach Mark Schmidt). In 2016, the Bonnies were denied a bid into the NCAA Tournament because of their non-conference schedule; Saint Bonaventure has regularly scheduled rivalry games with the three other Western New York universities in Division I (Buffalo, Canisius and Niagara), all of which are considered mid-majors. Their participation in a major conference, in turn, disqualifies the team from awards and tournament bids (such as the College Insider tournament mentioned above) reserved for mid-majors.

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In college athletics, particularly within basketball and football, a mid-major refers to athletic conferences and their member institutions that occupy an intermediate tier between the elite power conferences—such as the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC—and the Big East, and lower-division or less competitive programs. These are often distinguished by relatively modest athletic budgets compared to power conferences, smaller fanbases, and fewer resources for recruiting top talent, yet they frequently produce competitive teams capable of upsets in postseason play. The term "mid-major" originated in 1977 when Jack Kvancz, coach at Catholic University, described a matchup against as featuring "two mid-majors," highlighting programs outside the major leagues during an era when the NCAA Tournament was limited to just 32 teams and smaller schools had limited access. Over time, the classification has evolved with conference realignments—such as the dissolution of the Pac-12 in 2024—and the 2025 NCAA revenue-sharing settlement allowing up to $20.5 million annually for athletes, but it generally excludes the high-major leagues (the Power Four plus the Big East) while encompassing a broad range of others based on metrics like adjusted efficiency margins, average NCAA Tournament bids (often 1–3 per conference), and historical performance. Common examples of mid-major conferences include the Atlantic 10, Mountain West, (WCC), American Athletic Conference (AAC), Missouri Valley, and Colonial Athletic Association (CAA), which rely on strategic scheduling and coaching to compete against higher-resourced opponents. These programs play a vital role in the NCAA Tournament's "March Madness" allure in , and similar dynamics in football bowl games, often earning bids or automatic qualifiers and delivering Cinderella stories, such as George Mason's 2006 Final Four run from the CAA or VCU's 2011 Final Four appearance from the CAA, demonstrating that mid-majors can challenge the established hierarchy despite systemic disadvantages in facilities and media exposure.

Overview and Definition

Term Origin and Usage

The term "mid-major" was coined in 1977 by Jack Kvancz, then the head men's coach at Catholic University, who used it during a postgame discussion to describe a competitive matchup between his team and as "two mid-majors playing each other." This colloquial expression emerged in the context of athletics, distinguishing programs perceived as operating at a competitive level below institutions. In , "mid-major" generally refers to conferences outside the power leagues, such as the ACC, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, and SEC, which benefit from larger budgets, superior recruiting, and greater media exposure. In football, prior to the 2024 conference realignments, it similarly denoted teams outside the Power Five (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, SEC), though the term has largely been supplanted by "" to describe these non-power FBS conferences. The NCAA does not officially recognize "mid-major" as a classification, treating all Division I conferences equivalently for purposes like automatic qualification to postseason tournaments. Media and analysts commonly apply the term to highlight mid-tier status, particularly the challenges mid-major programs face, including limited access to high-seed placements or at-large bids in the NCAA Tournament—where power conferences have claimed about 85% of such spots in recent years—and the absence of multimillion-dollar television contracts that power leagues secure, often exceeding $30 million annually per school. Some view "mid-major" as pejorative or outdated, arguing it undervalues successful programs like Gonzaga or Loyola Chicago and oversimplifies a diverse landscape of over 30 Division I conferences.

Conference Classification

The classification of mid-major conferences in athletics is an informal designation without official NCAA metrics, primarily determined by factors such as media rights revenue, historical competitive success, and longstanding power status rather than enrollment size or geographic location. Power conferences, often termed high-majors, secure lucrative television contracts that dwarf those of other leagues; for instance, the Big Ten's media deal exceeds $7 billion over seven years, enabling greater investments in facilities, coaching, and recruiting that sustain dominance. Competitive success, measured by consistent NCAA Tournament appearances, national championships, and professional player production, further solidifies this status, as does a legacy of influence in shaping governance. In football, the Power Four conferences—Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC), Big Ten, Big 12, and Southeastern Conference (SEC)—represent the high-majors following the 2024 realignments, controlling the majority of College Football Playoff access and generating over $600 million annually in combined media revenue. For men's basketball, the Big East joins these as a high-major due to its robust non-conference scheduling, multiple annual NCAA bids, and production of NBA talent, despite lacking a football counterpart. These leagues' historical prestige, rooted in decades of rivalries and bowl game participations, distinguishes them from others, even as occasional upsets by non-power teams highlight fluid competitive dynamics. Mid-major conferences encompass the remaining NCAA Division I leagues, often divided into upper and lower tiers based on relative revenue (typically $10-50 million per school annually), tournament bid frequency, and program depth. Upper mid-majors like the Atlantic 10, Mountain West, American Athletic Conference (AAC), and Conference USA regularly secure multiple NCAA bids and feature teams with national profiles, such as Gonzaga in the West Coast Conference (WCC), which has reached multiple Final Fours despite modest media deals around $20 million per school. Lower mid-majors, including the Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference (MEAC), produce fewer bids and rely on single automatic qualifiers, with revenues often below $5 million per institution, limiting their national competitiveness. This tiering reflects varying abilities to attract top recruits and sustain upsets against high-majors, though no mid-major matches the power conferences' overall resources. The 2024 dissolution of the Pac-12, which saw ten members depart for Power Four leagues, has reshaped mid-major boundaries, leaving Oregon State and Washington State as transitional holdovers in a restructured Pac-12 that operates under a two-year NCAA grace period while partnering with the Mountain West for scheduling. This shift elevated former mid-major programs like Southern Methodist University (SMU), which joined the ACC in 2024 after exiting the AAC, gaining access to over $60 million in annual media revenue and boosting its status from Group of Five to high-major. Meanwhile, the Pac-12's planned 2026 expansion with Boise State, Colorado State, Fresno State, San Diego State, and Utah State from the Mountain West, as well as Texas State from the Sun Belt Conference, positions the conference as an emerging upper mid-major, potentially increasing its viability amid ongoing revenue disparities.

Historical Development

Early Adoption in Sports Media

The term "mid-major" was first coined in by Jack Kvancz, then-head coach of Catholic University's men's team, who used it to describe a matchup between his program and as "two mid-majors, two unknowns." Although initially niche, the label began gaining traction in during the late and early , particularly in coverage, as it provided a for distinguishing non-elite programs from power conference teams without the official NCAA classification. The rise of in the early 1980s accelerated the term's adoption, as the network's expanded programming brought greater national visibility to under-the-radar teams. Launching in 1979, secured rights to air NCAA tournament early rounds starting in 1980 and broadcast over 130 games in the 1980-81 season alone, often highlighting matchups involving smaller conferences that previously received little attention beyond local audiences. This shift marked a departure from the NCAA's pre-1984 control over broadcasts, which had restricted national exposure for non-power teams through limited national telecasts and reliance on regional syndication deals to protect live attendance. By the late 1980s and into the 1990s, the "mid-major" descriptor became embedded in mainstream narratives, with outlets like and frequently portraying such teams as plucky underdogs challenging the established hierarchy. A pivotal example was the coverage of the (UNLV)'s 1990 NCAA championship run from the , hailed as a triumphant mid-major story after the Runnin' Rebels dismantled 103-73 in the final—the largest margin in title game history. This framing, which emphasized resilience against resource-rich opponents, shaped public perception of mid-majors as viable contenders just before the era further stratified in football and influenced discourse.

Evolution Through Conference Realignments

The (BCS), established in 1998 and lasting until 2014, significantly altered the landscape for mid-major conferences in by creating automatic qualifiers for the six power conferences (now five), which guaranteed them access to prestigious bowl games and substantial revenue shares. This system marginalized non-automatic qualifier (non-AQ) conferences, including mid-majors like the Mountain West and , by limiting their opportunities for major bowl berths and financial distributions, despite occasional breakthroughs such as Boise State's victory. The BCS formula, which heavily weighted computer rankings and polls favoring established programs, reinforced a tiered structure that disadvantaged mid-majors in postseason play and resource allocation. The dissolution of the original exemplified how realignments could redefine mid-major boundaries in and football. The split separated the seven non-football Catholic institutions—known as the Catholic 7 (Georgetown, Villanova, St. John's, Providence, Seton Hall, Marquette, and DePaul)—which retained the Big East name and evolved into a high-major league through additions like , Xavier, and Creighton, elevating its status with consistent NCAA Tournament success and national visibility. In contrast, the football-playing remnants rebranded as the American Athletic Conference (AAC), which assumed mid-major classification due to its status and more limited media exposure, despite inheriting strong programs like and UConn. This bifurcation highlighted how conference realignments prioritized football-driven revenue, reshaping basketball's mid-major hierarchy by promoting basketball-centric leagues to major status while relegating hybrid conferences to the mid-tier. Conference realignments from 2021 to 2026 further intensified these shifts, particularly with the Pac-12's near-collapse in 2024, when ten of its members departed for power conferences: USC and UCLA to the Big Ten, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, and Utah to the Big 12, and Oregon State and Washington State remaining as holdovers. This exodus elevated those schools' mid-major perceptions to power status but destabilized the western landscape, prompting the remnant Pac-12 to merge elements with the Mountain West by adding Boise State, Colorado State, Fresno State, San Diego State, and Utah State starting in 2026, while Boise State played its final Mountain West season in 2025. These moves preserved mid-major viability for programs like Boise State, which maintained competitive relevance through sustained football success, but also diluted the Mountain West's strength, illustrating how realignments can both empower and fragment non-power entities. In recent years, sustained success has fostered "upper mid-majors" such as Gonzaga in the West Coast Conference and Dayton in the Atlantic 10, blurring distinctions with power conferences through deep NCAA Tournament runs and high-profile recruiting. Gonzaga, for instance, has achieved 25 or more wins in 25 consecutive seasons as of the 2023–24 season, with the streak extending into 2024–25 (26-9 record), positioning it as a perennial top-25 contender that rivals high-majors in talent and scheduling aggressiveness. Similarly, Dayton's Sweet 16 appearance in 2024 under coach Anthony Grant has elevated the A-10's profile, allowing these programs to attract top-100 recruits and secure lucrative non-conference matchups that challenge the traditional mid-major-power divide. In the 2024–25 season, Gonzaga reached the second round of the NCAA Tournament before exiting, while Dayton missed the tournament amid roster turnover, highlighting ongoing challenges for mid-majors in sustaining elite runs. This evolution, driven by coaching stability and NIL opportunities, has made the mid-major label increasingly fluid, as upper-tier programs compete on near-equal footing without power conference affiliation.

Applications in Specific Sports

In Men's Basketball

In men's college basketball, the term "mid-major" is predominantly applied to programs outside the power conferences, where securing at-large bids to the NCAA and achieving favorable seeding often proves challenging due to less competitive schedules that hinder in the NCAA's NET rankings. The NET, which emphasizes quadrant win distribution and efficiency metrics, tends to disadvantage mid-major teams by rewarding , leading to lower overall rankings and thus poorer seeds despite strong non-conference play. This dynamic forces many mid-major squads to rely on winning their tournaments for automatic qualification, as at-large selections favor power teams with more opportunities for high-quadrant victories. Despite these hurdles, mid-major programs have produced iconic tournament successes, including the (UNLV) Runnin' ' dominant 1990 run, where they defeated 103-73 in the final to claim the title as the last mid-major winner of the NCAA Tournament. Another landmark achievement came in 2011, when (VCU) Rams from the Colonial Athletic Association (CAA) staged a Cinderella story, advancing from the as an 11-seed to the by upsetting power conference teams like Georgetown, Purdue, Florida State, and top-seeded . These upsets highlight the potential for mid-majors to thrive in the single-elimination format when matchup dynamics align, though such deep runs remain exceptional. One notable exception to the typical mid-major trajectory is , a (WCC) member that has elevated its status through consistent excellence, earning 26 consecutive NCAA Tournament appearances from 1999 through 2025 (excluding 2020) while often competing at a power conference level in national rankings and matchups. Despite its mid-major conference label, Gonzaga's sustained success—including two game appearances—has blurred the lines, positioning it as a elite program that influences perceptions of mid-major viability. Statistically, mid-majors typically account for around 25 to 26 of the 68 annual NCAA teams, reflecting their share of automatic bids from non-power conferences, yet they seldom progress beyond the Sweet 16 owing to seeding disadvantages and tougher subsequent opponents from major conferences. In the 2025 tournament, for instance, 26 mid-major entrants were eliminated early, with none reaching the , underscoring persistent matchup imbalances that limit deeper advancement. This trend emphasizes the structural barriers mid-majors face in a field dominated by resource-rich power programs.

In Football

In college football, the term "mid-major" has been largely replaced by "Group of Five" since the inception of the College Football Playoff (CFP) in 2014, which established a clear delineation between the five autonomous conferences (now known as the Power Four following realignments) and the remaining five Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) conferences: the American Athletic Conference (AAC), Conference USA (C-USA), Mid-American Conference (MAC), Mountain West Conference (MW), and Sun Belt Conference. This shift in terminology reflects the structural inequalities in postseason access, revenue distribution, and competitive resources, where Group of Five teams are guaranteed at least one spot in the New Year's Six bowls but face significant barriers to advancing further. Historically, mid-major or Group of Five programs achieved rare national prominence before the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) era, most notably Brigham Young University (BYU), which claimed the 1984 national championship as the only undefeated Division I-A team after defeating Michigan 24-17 in the Holiday Bowl; BYU finished No. 1 in both major polls despite playing in the Western Athletic Conference, a non-major league at the time. However, from 2014 to 2023 under the four-team CFP format, no Group of Five team qualified for the playoff field, underscoring the dominance of Power conferences in the selection committee's rankings. Despite these challenges, programs have demonstrated competitive success in high-profile bowls, with emerging as a flagship example through multiple BCS and appearances between 2007 and 2014. The Broncos secured iconic victories, including a 43-42 overtime upset over in the —highlighted by a series of trick plays—and a 38-30 win against in the 2014 , marking their second triumph in that span. These achievements elevated Boise State's profile and validated the potential of non-Power programs to compete against elite opponents. The expansion to a 12-team CFP format beginning in the 2024 season introduced a dedicated automatic bid for the highest-ranked conference champion, providing expanded access; in its inaugural year, Boise State earned this spot as the Mountain West champion, advancing to the quarterfinals before falling to Penn State. Group of Five teams in the FBS operate under significant structural disadvantages, including a strict limit of 85 full scholarships—compared to the equivalency model in the Football Championship Subdivision (FCS), where 63 scholarships can be partially distributed across up to 105 players for greater roster flexibility—making talent acquisition and depth maintenance more difficult amid rising costs. The 2024 House v. NCAA settlement, approved in 2025, further exacerbates these issues by allowing schools to directly share up to $20.5 million annually in revenue with athletes starting in the 2025-26 , a mechanism that disproportionately benefits Power Four programs with their multibillion-dollar media deals while straining budgets and widening recruiting gaps. Conference realignments have occasionally offered brief opportunities for upward mobility, but they often reinforce resource disparities for remaining members.

In Other Sports

In swimming, the term "mid-major" is prominently used to categorize Division I programs outside the power conferences, with CollegeSwimming.com establishing objective rankings for these teams starting in 2002 to recognize their achievements despite resource limitations. These rankings, now continued through platforms like SwimSwam, evaluate performance based on points systems derived from meet results, spotlighting schools such as Princeton, Harvard, and Towson that compete effectively without the full financial backing of elite programs. Mid-major swimming teams operate under NCAA Division I scholarship limits of 9.9 equivalencies for men and 14 for women—equivalencies that often translate to partial awards spread across larger rosters—contrasting with power conference programs that leverage greater overall budgets to fund athletes more comprehensively, even under the same caps. This structure underscores the competitive challenges for mid-majors, where limited funding can restrict recruitment and training facilities, yet programs like the United States Naval Academy and the University of Hawaii have built sustained success through disciplined development. In volleyball, mid-major programs have demonstrated breakthrough potential in NCAA Championships, exemplified by the University of Dayton's 2024 campaign in the Atlantic 10 Conference, where the Flyers achieved a 31-3 record, went undefeated in league play, and advanced to the Sweet 16 as the No. 5 seed in their region. Dayton's run, capped by upsets over higher-seeded opponents, highlights how mid-majors can leverage coaching stability and team cohesion to punch above their weight, despite operating in conferences with smaller media deals and travel budgets compared to power leagues like the Big Ten. Similarly, in , American Athletic Conference (AAC) teams have secured numerous spots in the NCAA , with East Carolina boasting 36 appearances and Tulane 23 as of 2025, often advancing through regional play on the strength of regional talent pools and cost-effective operations. Tulane has reached the twice (2001, 2005). These successes illustrate mid-majors' ability to compete nationally in bat-and-ball sports, where individual skill and pitching depth can offset disparities in facilities and NIL opportunities. Across Olympic sports more broadly, mid-major institutions frequently outperform expectations due to their integrated academic-athletic models, which prioritize holistic student-athlete experiences and yield high graduation rates—such as the West Coast Conference's 95% NCAA Graduation Success Rate in 2024, third among Division I leagues. This focus fosters excellence in disciplines like track and field, where WCC members have historically claimed NCAA titles, including BYU's 1970 men's outdoor championship, though persistent funding gaps exacerbate vulnerabilities, with mid-majors generating far less revenue—averaging under $50 million annually versus power conferences' $100 million-plus—leading to program cuts or consolidations amid rising costs. In niche applications, the "mid-major" label extends to sports like wrestling and soccer for non-power conference programs, denoting competitive but under-resourced entities that rarely dominate national narratives, as seen in occasional at-large NCAA bids from conferences like the Mid-American or Conference USA.

Notable Mid-Major Conferences

Prominent Basketball Conferences

The Atlantic 10 Conference (A-10), founded in 1975 as an eight-school men's basketball-only league, has grown to 14 members as of 2025 with a strong presence on the East Coast, emphasizing competitive balance in non-revenue sports. The conference has produced notable NCAA Tournament success, including Virginia Commonwealth University's (VCU) improbable run to the 2011 Final Four as an 11th seed after entering via the First Four. Dayton University has been a consistent performer, earning NCAA bids in 2014, 2023, and 2024 (with 2020 canceled due to COVID-19). The (WCC), established in 1952 to facilitate basketball competition among five institutions, has evolved into a basketball-centric league following realignments that added national powers like Gonzaga in 1999. Gonzaga and Saint Mary's College have dominated recent play, with Gonzaga securing 22 WCC tournament titles—including the 2025 championship—and both programs frequently ranking in the top 20 nationally. Their rivalry has fueled the conference's postseason impact, exemplified by three NCAA bids in 2023 (Gonzaga, BYU, and Santa Clara). The Mountain West Conference (MW), launched in 1999, has emerged as a mid-major powerhouse in men's , with Boise State and State leading standout programs through consistent high-major scheduling and defensive prowess. State reached the 2024 NCAA as a 5th seed after a buzzer-beater victory in the , marking the conference's deepest tournament run. Boise State has complemented this with multiple NCAA appearances, contributing to the MW's league-record six bids in the 2024 tournament. Prominent mid-major conferences like the A-10, WCC, and MW typically average 4-6 NCAA Tournament teams annually in strong years, far exceeding the 3.7 multiple-bid non-power conferences league-wide, due to their depth and scheduling aggression.

Prominent Football Conferences

The American Athletic Conference (AAC) emerged as the successor to the Big East Conference's football operations following the latter's dissolution in 2013, initially retaining Temple while adding schools like Houston and Memphis, though subsequent realignments saw departures like Cincinnati (to Big 12 in 2023) and UConn's transition to independence (2021). This transition positioned the AAC as a prominent Group of Five entity, emphasizing access to major bowls through its champion's automatic berth in the postseason. A hallmark of the conference's football prominence came in 2017, when the University of Central Florida (UCF) Knights achieved an undefeated 13-0 season, culminating in a 34-27 victory over No. 7 Auburn in the Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl, which UCF self-proclaimed as a national championship amid debates over playoff exclusion. The Mountain West Conference (MW) has established itself as a powerhouse among leagues through consistent bowl contention and high-profile victories, particularly highlighted by Boise State University's dominance in the late 2000s and early 2010s. Boise State made notable appearances, including a 17-10 upset win over No. 3 TCU on January 1, 2010, following their undefeated 2009 season, showcasing the option offense's effectiveness against top-tier opponents. Other MW programs have contributed to the conference's reputation, with Fresno State securing multiple titles, including the 2022 Mountain West Championship via a 28-16 win over Boise State, and advancing to bowls like the . has also achieved success with its triple-option scheme, winning MW championships in 2002, 2005, and 2010, and posting a 10-win season in 2019 that earned them a Commander-in-Chief's Trophy and an bid. These performances have elevated the MW's bowl record to 70-60 overall as of 2025. The Sun Belt Conference has risen in football stature through aggressive expansion and on-field achievements by programs like Appalachian State and . Appalachian State has claimed two Sun Belt titles since joining in 2014, including back-to-back championships in 2018 and 2019. has been equally dominant, securing eight conference championships overall and consecutive Sun Belt titles in 2022 and 2023, the latter a 49-23 victory over Appalachian State in the championship game, which propelled them to an 11-3 record and a appearance. The conference expanded its footprint in 2022 by adding and , enhancing its eastern presence and competitive depth ahead of further realignments. Collectively, the Group of Five conferences, including the AAC, Mountain West, and Sun Belt, share in College Football Playoff (CFP) revenue distributions that totaled approximately $100 million in the most recent cycle prior to expansion, with the highest-ranked Group of Five champion receiving one automatic bid in the 12-team CFP starting in 2024—still dwarfed by the Power Four conferences' multibillion-dollar shares from media deals and bowl pools. This financial disparity underscores the challenges in matching Power Four resources, yet these conferences have greater postseason exposure and potential for upsets like Boise State's past Fiesta Bowl triumphs.

Challenges and Opportunities

Resource and Financial Constraints

Mid-major programs face significant revenue disparities compared to those in the Power Four conferences, primarily driven by lucrative media and television deals. In 2023, the average Power Five school received approximately $47.3 million annually from TV revenue distributions, while mid-major schools averaged just $4 million per school, creating a gap of over $43 million that has widened by 584% since 2002. Post-2024 media agreements, such as the Big Ten's $7 billion deal over seven years and the SEC's $3 billion extension, have elevated Power Four payouts to $50-100 million per school annually, whereas mid-major conferences like the Mountain West and American Athletic Conference distribute $8-15 million per institution, limiting investments in coaching, training, and operations. These financial constraints extend to infrastructure, where mid-major facilities often lag in capacity and modernity, hindering fan attendance and additional revenue streams. Many Mountain West venues, for instance, feature arenas with capacities under 20,000 seats, such as Colorado State's Moby Arena (8,745 seats) and New Mexico State's Pan American Center (12,572 seats), compared to Power Four staples like the Rose Bowl (92,542 seats), which reduces ticket sales potential and diminishes recruiting allure by projecting lower program prestige. Older stadiums and arenas also incur higher maintenance costs without the upgrade budgets afforded by power conference windfalls, perpetuating a cycle of limited gate receipts that average far below those of elite programs. The advent of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) opportunities since has exacerbated talent retention challenges for mid-majors, as lower collective funding forces the loss of top performers to wealthier suitors via the transfer portal. Mid-major NIL collectives typically raise $1-5 million annually, relying on modest donor networks, while Power Four counterparts secure $10 million or more through expansive bases and corporate partnerships, enabling them to offer superior compensation packages to high-profile athletes. This disparity, intensified by the 2025 transfer portal cycles, has led to mid-majors posting significant net losses of key players from their rosters annually to power programs, further straining competitive viability. Funding for mid-major athletics heavily depends on student fees and private donors, sources that provide inconsistent support amid rising operational demands from the 2025 NCAA House v. NCAA settlement. The settlement mandates up to $20.5 million per school starting in 2025-26, but mid-majors, with limited media income, must cover these costs—potentially $10-15 million annually—through increased student fees (averaging $500-1,000 per at many institutions) and donor appeals that yield far less than power conference endowments. As of fall 2025, early implementation has seen some mid-majors raise fees by $100-500 annually to meet initial sharing requirements. Without proportional revenue gains, this has prompted budget reallocations, including cuts to non-revenue sports, as mid-major athletic departments absorb settlement back-pay obligations estimated at $2.8 billion collectively across .

Recruiting and Competitive Disadvantages

Mid-major programs face significant recruiting challenges due to lower national visibility compared to power conference schools, which limits their access to elite high school talent. Power conferences, with their extensive media exposure, larger budgets for , and established pipelines through AAU circuits, dominate the recruitment of top prospects. For instance, in the final 2025 recruiting class, zero players from the top 100 committed to a mid-major , highlighting how mid-majors secure just a fraction of the nation's highest-rated recruits. This disparity stems from mid-majors' inability to compete in high-profile events and offer the same level of NIL opportunities, forcing them to target under-the-radar players or those seeking immediate playing time. Scheduling biases further exacerbate competitive disadvantages for mid-majors, particularly in non-conference play. To bolster budgets and improve metrics like the ranking, mid-major teams often schedule "guarantee games" against power conference opponents, traveling to play on the road for financial compensation. These matchups typically result in losses, inflating mid-majors' loss columns and creating Quad 3 defeats (against teams ranked 76-160 in ), which penalize their overall efficiency margins and seeding potential in the NCAA Tournament. For example, such losses can drop a team's ranking significantly, reducing at-large bid chances or forcing lower seeds despite strong conference performance. While these hurdles create perceived competitive inferiority, success stories like Gonzaga demonstrate exceptions through strategic recruiting and stability. Under coach , who has led the program since 1999, Gonzaga has built contention by heavily utilizing international recruits—such as Filip Petrusev from and from international circuits—alongside domestic mid-tier talents, achieving consistent NCAA Tournament appearances without power conference resources. This approach emphasizes player development and team culture over star-chasing. Long-term, these disadvantages contribute to higher player turnover at mid-majors via the transfer portal, as developed players seek opportunities at higher levels. Mid-major rosters experience elevated churn, with programs losing key contributors after breakout seasons; UAB, for example, saw 15 players enter the portal following a 24-win campaign in 2024-25, disrupting continuity. Historically, mid-majors win approximately 15-20% of matchups against power conference teams in non-conference games, underscoring sustained competitive gaps that perpetuate talent drainage and rebuilding cycles.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.