Hubbry Logo
Next Generation JammerNext Generation JammerMain
Open search
Next Generation Jammer
Community hub
Next Generation Jammer
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Next Generation Jammer
Next Generation Jammer
Next Generation Jammer
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

An EA-18G Growler equipped with the Next Generation Jammer-Mid Band lands at Naval Air Station Point Mugu

The Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) is a program to develop airborne electronic warfare systems as replacements for the AN/ALQ-99 found on the EA-18G Growler and EA-6B Prowler electronic attack aircraft. Requirements for the system were outlined by the US Navy in 2008 and development of the NGJ program began in 2010. The mid-band portion of the NGJ (NGJ-MB), designated AN/ALQ-249, reached Initial Operating Capability (IOC) in 2021.

In accordance with the Joint Electronics Type Designation System (JETDS), the "AN/ALQ-249" designation represents the 249th design of an Army-Navy airborne electronic device for special countermeasures equipment. The JETDS system also now is used to name all Department of Defense and some NATO electronic systems.

History

[edit]

US Air Force EF-111A Raven, US Navy EA-18G Growler, US Marine Corps and EA-6B Prowler aircraft, as well as aircraft of the Royal Australian Air Force, all carried the AN/ALQ-99. In the primary role of suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD), this radar jamming and deception system provided modified escort jamming from outside the range of known surface to air missiles.[1] Poor reliability of the ALQ-99, in use since 1972, and frequent failures of its Built In Test (BIT) often caused crews to fly missions with undetected faults. The ALQ-99 also interferes with the host aircraft's Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, reduces the top speed of the aircraft due to drag and imposes a high workload on EA-18G 2-person crew.[2]

Design

[edit]

In September 2008, the U.S. Navy outlined the basic requirements of the NGJ and stated that the design must be modular and use open architecture. The program is expected to consist of three development phases, one each for low-band (NGJ-LB), mid-band (NGJ-MB) and high-band (NGJ-HB) coverage.[3][4] The Navy selected four companies, BAE, ITT, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon in 2009 to submit designs for the Next Generation Jammer, each receiving a US$6 million (equivalent to about US$8.1 million in 2024) concept development contract.[5] The NGJ will have cyber attack capabilities using the AESA radar to insert tailored data streams into remote systems.[6]

By 2010, the Office of Naval Research (ONR) started a Next-Generation Airborne Electronic Attack (NGAEA) project (ONR Project Code 31) developing technologies for the NGJ. NGAEA had four primary tasks: (1) improving antenna array technologies, (2) improving RF power amplifier technologies to cover wide RF bandwidths, (3) improving beam steering technologies, (4) improving exciter technologies providing ultra-wideband direct digital synthesis.[7] That same year, the U.S. Navy awarded prototype development contracts to the same four companies, BAE, ITT, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon totaling US$168 million (about US$242 million in 2024). At the time, the Navy was expected to invest over $4 billion into development of the NGJ project.[8]

In August 2012, Lockheed Martin said the company's Joint Strike Fighter would be able to carry the NGJ.[9] However, on August 23, 2012, Marine Corps Commandant General James F. Amos, said the Marine Corps had no plans to pursue an electronic warfare variant of the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter. He explained saying, the AN/APG-81 AESA radar on the F-35 "already sets the fifth generation fighter apart as an electronic warfare platform".[10] The system was expected to be fielded on the Growler by 2020 with further expectations the EA-18G would remain in-service well into the 2030s,[11] but subsequent budget cuts pushed IOC to 2022 for the Mid Band pod.[12][13]

On July 8, 2013, Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) announced that the US$279.4 million (about US$377 million in 2024) cost-plus-incentive-fee contract for a 22-month Technical Development (TD) phase had been awarded to Raytheon.[14][15] However, on 26 July 2013, the Navy issued Raytheon a stop-work order following a formal protest of the contract by BAE.[16] By November 2013, a Government Accountability Office investigation upheld the protest claiming they found that the Navy used improper procedures to select Raytheon. The Navy further examined the issue, making some corrections recommended by the GAO, and announced on January 24th Raytheon would continue as prime contractor.[17]

After a successful System Readiness Review in June 2014, Raytheon expected to move forward with flight testing in September 2014 and reach an IOC in late 2020. The test was flown in November 2014.[18] The NGJ-MB pod operates independently of other aircraft systems,[19] automatically responding to identified threats. One unique aspect of the NGJ is that its AESA array combines EW, communications, radar, and signals intelligence (SIGINT). AESA technology is known to perform EW and radar, but handling SIGINT and serving as a communications array are new capabilities. Other than dedicated EW aircraft, the pods can be installed on other platforms like the UCLASS with little modification.[20]

In a 2017 memorandum of understanding (MOU), the Royal Australian Air Force contributed A$250 million (about A$286 million in 2022) towards the NGJ-MB program, AN/ALQ-249, and is directly participating in its development.[21] The first flight test of the NGJ-MB version of the pod took place in August 2020 aboard an EA-18G out of Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland. This flight was intended to prove that the pod could be safely flown aboard the EA-18G. Initial Operating Capability is on the MB pod in FY 2022, with a Capability Block 1 contract awarded in the fall of 2020. The mid-band and then the low-band pods will supplement the legacy jamming system on the Growlers until the high-band, the last of the three increments, is fielded and the legacy system can be safely retired.[13]

In October 2018, the Navy awarded contracts to L3Harris and Northrop Grumman of more than US$35 million each for development of the NGJ low-band (NGJ-LB) pod. [22] L3Harris was selected in December 2020 as prime contractor, was awarded an additional US$496 million contract to deliver four prototype NGJ-LB test pods and eight operational pods.[23] However, the GAO discovered a problem that led to a contract recompete due to the appearance of conflict of interest.[24] After nearly four years, in August 2024, the NGJ-LB contract was again awarded to L3Harris.[25]

As of September 2024, funding and development timelines of the NGJ-HB (high-band) were still unknown.[26]

In December, 2024, Raytheon was awarded a US$590 million follow-on production contract from the US Navy for the NGJ-MB system,[27] and in that same month, the US Navy declared Initial Operating Capability for the system.[4][28] Then, in May 2025, Raytheon was awarded another US$580 million to deliver Lot V shipsets of the NGJ-MB.[29]

Characteristics

[edit]

L3Harris and Northrop Grumman are developing the NGJ low-band (NGJ-LB) expected to operate from 0.1–2 GHz (299.79–14.99 cm) and high-band (NGJ-HB) expected to operate from 6–18 GHz (5.00–1.67 cm) complementing the NGJ-MB which reportedly operates from 2–6 GHz (14.99–5.00 cm).[30] By comparison, the AN/ALQ-99 being replaced by the NGJ operated from 0.064–20 GHz (468.43–1.50 cm).

Deployment

[edit]

The AN/ALQ-249(V)1 Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band deployed for the first time in combat sometime in 2024 with Electronic Attack Squadron 133 (VAQ-133), assigned to the USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group (CSG), against Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen.[31]

See also

[edit]
[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Next Generation Jammer

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) is a podded airborne electronic attack system developed for the United States Navy's EA-18G Growler aircraft to replace the legacy tactical jamming system, delivering enhanced stand-off jamming capabilities against advanced enemy radar and communications threats. The NGJ program employs an incremental acquisition approach across three frequency bands—Mid-Band, Low Band, and High Band—to address evolving challenges with greater power output, precision targeting, and adaptability than prior systems. The Mid-Band increment (NGJ-MB), led by Technologies, achieved initial operational capability in December 2024, marking the first combat-proven deployment of the system by Electronic Attack Squadron 133 (VAQ-133) and enabling quantum improvements in electronic warfare effectiveness for . NGJ-MB pods provide expanded frequency agility, simultaneous multi-threat engagement, and higher , supporting full-rate production decisions anticipated in 2025. The Low Band increment (NGJ-LB), under development by L3Harris Technologies, targets lower-frequency threats with extended range and multi-target capabilities, following a $587 million and manufacturing contract awarded in September 2024.

Program Overview

Objectives and Increments

The Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) program aims to deliver advanced electronic attack capabilities for the U.S. Navy's EA-18G Growler aircraft, enabling commanders to deny, degrade, or deceive enemy use of the through both reactive and pre-emptive jamming techniques against sophisticated air defense radars and communication systems. This supports suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) missions by carrier air wings in high-threat environments, addressing limitations in legacy systems against evolving integrated air defense networks. To systematically close spectrum gaps in electronic warfare, the NGJ adopts an evolutionary acquisition approach across three increments tailored to distinct frequency bands and threat types. The Mid-Band increment (NGJ-MB) targets primary threat radars operating in the 2-6 GHz range, providing core jamming against common acquisition and tracking systems. The Low-Band increment (NGJ-LB) focuses on frequencies below 2 GHz (approximately 100 MHz to 2 GHz), countering early-warning radars, surface surveillance, and long-range communication links. The High-Band increment (NGJ-HB) addresses threats above 6 GHz (up to 18 GHz), including precision fire-control and missile guidance radars. Central to all increments is the objective of enabling simultaneous engagement of multiple threats via agile, digital electronic attack methods, which facilitate rapid reconfiguration and adaptation to dynamic battlefield conditions. These capabilities emphasize software-defined architectures for enhanced responsiveness and seamless integration into frameworks, allowing coordinated effects with other assets to dominate the .

Replacement of Legacy Systems

The Tactical Jamming System, fielded by the U.S. Navy in 1971, suffers from inherent limitations rooted in its analog architecture and dated design, including mechanical antenna steering constraints that hinder adaptability to agile threats. These shortcomings manifest in low power output, which has led to undetected faults in built-in test systems, prompting mission aborts and compromising operational reliability during deployments. Additionally, the system's vulnerability to modern digital electronic warfare environments, combined with high maintenance demands from aging components, has strained and sustainment efforts amid escalating threats from peer competitors. The Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) program directly addresses these deficiencies by delivering substantially higher —reported as up to ten times that of the ALQ-99—along with enhanced precision in jamming operations and improved system reliability, thereby reducing the overall footprint. These upgrades fulfill U.S. requirements for countering advanced integrated air defense systems employed by adversaries such as and , where the ALQ-99's constraints would otherwise limit standoff electronic attack effectiveness. NGJ's design emphasizes rapid adaptability through software-defined capabilities, mitigating the ALQ-99's obsolescence without relying on its high-failure-prone hardware. Under the transition plan, NGJ pods—starting with the Mid-Band increment (AN/ALQ-249)—will initially augment the ALQ-99 on the EA-18G Growler platform before fully supplanting it across frequency bands, with Mid-Band achieving initial operational capability in December 2024. Low-Band and High-Band variants are slated for integration by the late , enabling comprehensive spectrum coverage and phased retirement of the legacy system to align with evolving threat landscapes. This incremental approach ensures continuity of electronic warfare missions while progressively enhancing Growler squadrons' ability to disrupt enemy command-and-control networks.

Development History

Inception and Early Concepts

The conceptual development of the Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) originated in the early , amid assessments of the tactical jamming system's growing obsolescence against post-Cold War advancements in adversary integrated air defenses, including (AESA) radars deployed by Chinese and Russian forces. (APL) contributed to initial NGJ concepts starting in 2001, focusing on evolutionary electronic warfare capabilities to address these gaps without overhauling legacy platforms like the EA-6B Prowler and its successor, the EA-18G Growler. The U.S. Navy formally initiated the NGJ program in 2013 as a core element of its airborne electronic attack modernization roadmap, prioritizing a podded, externally carried system to enable rapid integration on the Growler without requiring airframe structural modifications. This approach stemmed from operational analyses highlighting the ALQ-99's vulnerabilities to frequency-agile, high-power radars in dense threat environments, necessitating a successor with software-defined and distributed jamming potential. Early risk reduction activities under Program Element (PE) 0604274N emphasized technology demonstrations for (GaN)-based components and AESA architectures, aimed at enhancing to counter low-observable and networked threats while mitigating development uncertainties. These efforts built on first-hand evaluations of ALQ-99 shortfalls in simulated scenarios against evolving peer competitors, establishing NGJ's foundational requirements for dominance in contested .

Mid-Band Development and Milestones

In April 2016, the U.S. Navy awarded Raytheon a sole-source cost-plus-incentive-fee contract for the engineering and manufacturing development phase of the Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB), selecting the company's gallium nitride (GaN)-based active electronically scanned array (AESA) design over competing proposals for its advanced power output and frequency agility. Raytheon delivered the first NGJ-MB engineering development model pod to the Navy in August 2019, enabling initial ground verification of installation procedures, mass properties, and built-in test functions on the EA-18G Growler platform. Integration testing commenced shortly thereafter, with the pod achieving its first flight on an EA-18G in August 2020 as part of the developmental flight test program, demonstrating effective multi-frequency jamming against simulated radar and communication threats during over 300 hours of subsequent airborne evaluations. The program advanced to Milestone C approval on June 28, 2021, authorizing low-rate initial production following successful completion of risk reduction and system qualification testing. received a $580 million on May 16, 2025, for low-rate initial production Lot V, encompassing additional NGJ-MB pod shipsets including spares and support for U.S. and international partners. The declared initial operational capability for NGJ-MB in December 2024, confirming the system's readiness for fleet integration after production-representative pods began delivery in July 2023.

Low-Band and High-Band Pursuits

The Next Generation Jammer Low Band (NGJ-LB) program advanced through a competitive process initiated in 2018, when the U.S. awarded concept refinement contracts valued at $36 million to (subsequently ) and $35 million to . Raytheon's protest of these awards was denied by the Government Accountability Office in October 2018, allowing initial development to proceed. However, subsequent protests by , including a sustained challenge in September 2021 over evaluation irregularities, prolonged the effort and necessitated re-evaluations. Following resolution of litigation spanning nearly five years, the awarded a $587.4 million engineering and development contract on September 12, 2024, for NGJ-LB pods to equip the EA-18G Growler. NGJ-LB specifically targets capability shortfalls in the low-frequency spectrum against advanced adversary systems, including VHF and UHF surveillance radars that enable long-range detection and counter-stealth operations. These gaps in the legacy Tactical Jamming System have heightened urgency for NGJ-LB, as peer competitors deploy low-band emitters to detect stealth platforms like the F-35 and F-22 at extended ranges. The system's design emphasizes augmented electronic attack in the 100 MHz to 2 GHz range, operating alongside NGJ mid-band pods to restore spectrum dominance. In June 2025, contracted for subsystem support to bolster NGJ-LB's development and integration. The Navy's persistence in selecting L3Harris's design amid procurement disputes underscores a calculated acceptance of technical risks to expedite delivery against time-sensitive threats from adversaries like and , prioritizing operational urgency over exhaustive threshold compliance in early evaluations. In contrast, the NGJ High Band (NGJ-HB) increment, intended for jamming millimeter-wave and upper threats such as precision fire-control radars, remains in early conceptualization as of 2025 with minimal disclosed milestones. Naval priorities have deferred NGJ-HB to focus resources on mid-band and low-band fielding, reflecting assessments that low- and mid-frequency gaps represent more immediate vulnerabilities in contested electromagnetic environments.

Technical Design and Capabilities

System Architecture and Components

The Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) utilizes a modular, pod-based architecture comprising external, self-contained units optimized for carriage on compatible aircraft pylons. The mid-band increment, designated AN/ALQ-249, represents the initial pod configuration, featuring integrated active electronically scanned array (AESA) antennas arrayed across the pod's structure to enable directional electronic attack capabilities. Each pod incorporates four AESA panels, which employ gallium nitride (GaN)-based high-power amplifiers within transmit/receive modules to achieve efficient signal amplification and beam steering without mechanical gimbals. This solid-state design enhances system reliability and reduces vulnerability to failure modes inherent in legacy vacuum-tube systems. Key internal components include an exciter subsystem for initial signal generation, processors forming the all-digital backend for real-time synthesis and , and dedicated cooling mechanisms to dissipate from sustained high-output operations. The open-systems architecture facilitates software-driven upgrades, minimizing the need for hardware overhauls and supporting evolutionary enhancements across increments. The pod form factor emphasizes modularity and survivability through standardized interfaces for rapid attachment and detachment, allowing crews to swap units without extensive modifications. Band-specific pods—mid-band, low-band, and high-band—enable flexible loadouts, where operators can equip with combinations tailored to mission requirements, thereby achieving layered dominance without redesigning the core system. This incremental approach prioritizes engineering choices that balance size, weight, and power constraints while ensuring the pods remain autonomous units with self-contained power and control electronics.

Jamming Technologies and Performance

The Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) utilizes (AESA) antennas to enable , supporting rapid geolocation of threats and the simultaneous jamming of multiple emitters through focused, agile beams. This electronic scanning capability allows for beam repositioning in fractions of a second, outperforming the mechanical scanning limitations of the legacy system, which relies on slower physical pod adjustments and is less effective against dynamic threats. NGJ incorporates advanced electronic attack techniques, including noise jamming to saturate enemy receivers with high-power interference and deception methods such as the generation of false targets or echoes. These are augmented by digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) systems, which capture incoming signals, modify them digitally, and retransmit altered versions for precise replay-based deception, enhancing effectiveness against radars using pulse compression or other waveform features. The software-defined architecture further permits real-time waveform reconfiguration in milliseconds, adapting to frequency-hopping or agile radars by tracking and countering rapid signal changes across the mid-band spectrum (approximately 0.5–2 GHz for the mid-band increment). In terms of performance, NGJ delivers significantly higher effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP), estimated at up to 10 times that of the AN/ALQ-99's approximately 6.8 kW output, enabling robust standoff jamming against advanced integrated air defense systems. This power scaling, combined with AESA precision, supports engagement of multiple fourth- and fifth-generation threats at extended ranges, as verified in developmental testing phases through 2023, where the system demonstrated superior disruption of simulated peer-adversary emitters compared to legacy pod configurations.

Power Generation and Frequency Coverage

The Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) employs a ram-air () generator to produce electrical power independently during flight, enabling high-peak outputs from (GaN)-based amplifiers without relying on the host aircraft's limited electrical capacity. This addresses key limitations of the legacy system, which drew power from the EA-18G Growler and constrained jamming intensity and duration due to aircraft generator constraints. The , developed by and partners like Advanced Technologies Group International (ATGI), can generate up to 90 kW at low-airspeed, high-altitude conditions typical of electronic warfare missions, supporting advanced jamming techniques and extended standoff engagements. NGJ operates across incremental frequency bands tailored to specific threat types, with the mid-band (NGJ-MB) covering 2-6 to target fire-control radars used in precision-guided munitions and surface-to-air . The low-band (NGJ-LB) addresses frequencies below 2 (approximately 0.1-2 ), focusing on early-warning and search radars that detect at long ranges. The high-band (NGJ-HB) extends above 6 (up to 18 ), countering terminal-guidance and fire-control systems in advanced seekers. Collectively, these increments aim to provide comprehensive coverage from roughly 0.1-18 , enabling the system to disrupt diverse threats simultaneously. GaN technology in NGJ's active electronically scanned array (AESA) pods yields higher power efficiency and thermal tolerance compared to legacy components, converting more input energy into effective jamming output and minimizing waste heat that could limit operational . This efficiency directly enhances mission duration and effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP), allowing sustained jamming against multiple targets at greater standoff distances—up to several times that of the ALQ-99—while reducing failure risks in prolonged high-threat scenarios. The independent RAT power supply further amplifies these gains by enabling peak GaN amplifier performance without power throttling, thereby extending overall jamming range and sortie .

Platforms and Integration

Integration with EA-18G Growler

The AN/ALQ-249 Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB) pods integrate with the EA-18G Growler as external carriage stores on underwing stations, requiring limited aircraft modifications for attachment, power provisioning, and data exchange to support electronic attack operations. The system leverages the Growler's existing mission computers and electronic receivers, such as the , to process fused sensor inputs for coordinated jamming effects against enemy and communications. Integration testing commenced with ground validations prior to the first airborne flight of an NGJ-MB pod on an EA-18G in August 2020, conducted under the oversight of the Weapons Division, confirming compatibility with the host aircraft's and systems. This phase built on earlier laboratory efforts at facilities including China Lake, California, ensuring seamless incorporation without to onboard receivers or performance degradation. To facilitate a phased transition from the legacy Tactical Jamming System, the NGJ design permits mixed pod configurations on the Growler, allowing squadrons to retain operational flexibility during incremental fielding while augmenting capabilities against advanced threats in missions. This adaptability supports the EA-18G's role in suppressing enemy air defenses within environments by combining legacy and next-generation jamming assets.

Adaptation for Other Platforms

The U.S. and Technologies (RTX) have begun exploring adaptations of Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) mid-band technology for platforms beyond the EA-18G Growler, including bombers, fighters, and unmanned aerial systems (UAS), to expand standoff electronic attack capabilities. This effort leverages the NGJ's pod-based modularity, enabling integration onto unmanned hosts for reduced risk in contested environments, with discussions emphasizing digital software adaptability for diverse airframes. Adaptations for ground-based or surface ship platforms remain under preliminary joint force consideration, primarily to support multi-domain operations, though air-launched variants are prioritized due to superior mobility and rapid deployment requirements in dynamic threat scenarios. For export, NGJ systems hold viability for allied forces operating F/A-18 variants, as evidenced by production contracts supporting the Royal Australian Air Force's EA-18G Growlers, which facilitate coalition suppression of enemy air defenses without requiring U.S.-specific proprietary integrations. This positions NGJ as a modular enabler for international partners, focusing on shared coverage against advanced radars and communications.

Operational Deployment

Testing and Evaluation

Developmental testing of the Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB) began with the first flight of the pod on an EA-18G Growler in August 2020, initiating a multi-year program at and Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake. By fiscal year 2022, the program had accumulated 651 total flight hours, including 320 dedicated developmental hours, evaluating system integration, reliability, and jamming performance against surrogate threats representative of advanced integrated air defense systems. These tests confirmed the pod's ability to deny radar tracks and neutralize threats more effectively than the legacy system, leveraging higher effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) for standoff jamming of mid-band radars and communications. In 2023, Air Test and Evaluation Squadron Nine () logged nearly 700 additional flight hours, clearing 95 percent of the full and validating core electronic attack functions in threat-representative environments, though high-angle-of-attack maneuvers were deferred due to maintenance constraints. A June 2020 Government Accountability Office (GAO) assessment highlighted software immaturity as a key risk, noting that critical technologies had not fully matured prior to engineering and manufacturing development, potentially delaying integration with the EA-18G's mission systems. The Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) echoed concerns in subsequent reports, citing hardware reliability shortfalls and insufficient built-in test capabilities that limited fault isolation during flights. Despite these issues, integrated testing completed in March 2024 during demonstrated operational viability with pre-production software, showing positive trends in data collection for validation. In April 2023, the program conducted an Operational Test Readiness Review, certifying readiness for initial operational test and evaluation (IOT&E) by the Program Executive Office, though DOT&E withheld full approval due to system immaturity and unvalidated digital models, identifying risks in effectiveness and suitability but affirming basic jamming functions against surrogate threats. IOT&E commenced in July 2024, incorporating events like Exercise RIMPAC, with DOT&E approving the test plan and noting ongoing reliability improvements sufficient to support initial operational capability declaration in December 2024, prior to full IOT&E completion. Overall, pre-IOC assessments validated the NGJ-MB's superiority in threat neutralization metrics over ALQ-99 baselines, with empirical flight data indicating reliable radar denial in large-force exercises, despite persistent software-hardware integration challenges.

Initial Combat Use and Effectiveness

The Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB) entered initial combat operations during a five-month deployment by Electronic Attack Squadron 133 (VAQ-133), operating EA-18G Growler aircraft equipped with the ALQ-249 pods, to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility starting in mid-2024. This marked the first tactical employment of the system in a contested maritime environment, including operations supporting suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) against radar-guided threats in the region amid Houthi attacks on shipping. VAQ-133's mission involved integrating NGJ-MB jamming with kinetic strikes, demonstrating the pod's ability to disrupt multiple emitters simultaneously at extended ranges compared to the legacy system. Post-deployment validation in December 2024 led the U.S. Navy to declare Initial Operational Capability (IOC) for the NGJ-MB, confirming its readiness for fleet-wide use following real-world performance data from the 5th Fleet operations. By July 2025, assessments reported the system's combat-proven effectiveness in multi-target engagements, enabling EA-18G aircraft to neutralize advanced air defense radars without the reliability shortfalls historically associated with ALQ-99 pods, such as power degradation and limited frequency agility. No pod failures were documented as mission-abortive during these initial sorties, attributing success to the NGJ-MB's and higher .

Challenges and Criticisms

Technical and Reliability Issues

The Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB) has encountered hardware reliability shortfalls, primarily stemming from immature technologies identified in early assessments. A 2020 Government Accountability Office review highlighted that key components, including gallium nitride (GaN)-based amplifiers, lacked sufficient maturity at critical design review, complicating system integration and contributing to operational test setbacks due to unproven performance under stress conditions. These GaN elements, while enabling higher power output, are susceptible to thermal stresses that accelerate degradation, resulting in mean time between failures (MTBF) below program goals during laboratory and flight evaluations. Software deficiencies have emerged as a dominant reliability concern in subsequent testing phases. Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) assessments through 2024 noted persistent issues with software stability, including faults in that impaired waveform generation and agility—essential for adaptive jamming against dynamic threats—leading to intermittent failures and reduced effectiveness in simulated environments. By early 2025, these software-related problems had supplanted hardware as the primary driver of reliability gaps below established thresholds, with built-in test (BIT) diagnostics occasionally failing to detect latent anomalies, thereby risking undetected mission impacts. The has pursued mitigations through iterative upgrades across production lots, incorporating software patches and enhanced thermal management for GaN modules to incrementally improve MTBF and fault detection. Program officials maintain that fielded pod reliability, while suboptimal in controlled metrics, demonstrates sufficient utility in operational scenarios, prioritizing real-world jamming efficacy over idealized lab benchmarks.

Procurement Delays and Cost Overruns

The Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB) program faced substantial timeline slippages after received the engineering and manufacturing development contract in July 2016, with initial operational capability (IOC) delayed until January 2025—nearly nine years later, exceeding the Navy's original projection of five to six years from award. These delays stemmed primarily from persistent hardware reliability shortfalls and subsequent software integration challenges, as identified in annual reports by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E), which deferred key operational testing milestones multiple times, including the Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) into 2024. The NGJ Low Band (NGJ-LB) increment encountered further procurement hurdles, including bid protests sustained by the Government Accountability Office () in 2021 over conflicts of interest in the evaluation process, which invalidated the December 2020 award to and triggered a recompete lasting nearly five years. This litigation, compounded by threshold requirement waivers, postponed the final engineering and manufacturing development contract award to until September 2024 at a value of $587.4 million. Earlier GAO-denied protests in 2018 had already fragmented initial low-band efforts between L3 and , adding to schedule instability. Cost growth has accompanied these delays, with the overall NGJ program accumulating expenditures well in excess of $5 billion across increments, including recent production contracts such as $590 million for NGJ-MB lots in December 2024 and ongoing research, development, test, and evaluation funding under Program Element (PE) 0604274N. FY2024 budget requests for PE 0604274N totaled $40.5 million, reflecting a post-NGJ-MB baseline adjustment amid shifts toward extended variants like NGJ-MBX, though cumulative outlays have drawn scrutiny for the incremental acquisition model's tendency to sustain parallel efforts and induce rework. GAO analyses have highlighted risks from immature technologies and weak requirements traceability, contributing to higher-than-planned expenses through iterative fixes rather than upfront maturation. Fiscal conservatives have criticized these dynamics, arguing that fragmented increments and protest-induced halts exemplify inefficient acquisition practices that inflate costs without proportional schedule gains, per GAO observations on DoD-wide electronic warfare programs. In contrast, defense proponents contend the investments yield superior jamming power and frequency agility over legacy ALQ-99 systems, justifying overruns in light of evolving threats from advanced integrated air defenses.

Testing and Maturity Concerns

The Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB) has faced scrutiny over deficiencies in its operational testing regime, particularly highlighted in a January 2023 analysis by the Potomac Officers Club, which warned that the impending initial operational test and evaluation (IOT&E) scheduled for May of that year risked being undermined by inadequate verification of digital models and simulations against real-world threats. This shortfall could leave unaddressed vulnerabilities exposed during live electronic warfare scenarios, as laboratory-based assessments failed to fully replicate the dynamic, peer-adversary environments anticipated in contested airspace. Subsequent evaluations by the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) reinforced these issues, noting in early 2025 assessments persistent reliability challenges—shifting from hardware to software-related problems—that delayed full IOT&E completion into the second quarter of fiscal year 2025. DOT&E reports emphasized ongoing shortfalls in validating tools for simulating advanced adversary systems, potentially eroding confidence in the system's maturity against near-peer threats like those from or . Despite these flags, the U.S. proceeded to declare initial operational capability (IOC) for NGJ-MB in December 2024, citing operational urgency in response to escalating tensions, though critics within testing communities argued this rushed timeline prioritized deployment speed over comprehensive rigor, mirroring historical pitfalls in legacy systems such as the upgrades that suffered from protracted post-fielding fixes. Empirical data from the system's first combat deployment in 2024, aboard EA-18G with Electronic Attack Squadron VAQ-133 during a five-month U.S. Fifth Fleet operation, provided partial mitigation to lab-centric concerns, with squadron leaders reporting effective tactical employment against real-time threats without major disruptions. However, independent analysts and DOT&E observations cautioned that this early fielding, while operationally successful in limited contexts, did not substitute for exhaustive IOT&E, as untested edge cases in high-intensity jamming against integrated air defenses could manifest in future peer conflicts, echoing reliability shortfalls that plagued prior electronic warfare pod iterations. Proponents of extended testing advocate for fuller adversary emulation in simulations to ensure maturity, arguing that the Navy's balance of urgency against thoroughness remains a calculated informed by incremental feedback rather than definitive validation.

Strategic and Future Implications

Role in Modern Electronic Warfare

The Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) significantly bolsters the EA-18G Growler's core mission of denying, degrading, and disrupting adversary command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems, thereby enhancing U.S. naval deterrence in (A2/AD) environments dominated by peer competitors. By countering sophisticated networked threats and integrated air defense systems, NGJ integrates into the Navy's distributed lethality doctrine, which disperses offensive capabilities across surface and air assets to complicate enemy targeting and improve overall force survivability. This doctrinal evolution emphasizes electronic attack as a multiplier for kinetic strikes, allowing Growler-equipped carrier strike groups to project power while degrading opponent kill chains from extended ranges. NGJ's advanced jamming architecture enables standoff operations that minimize exposure to high-risk zones, offering a non-kinetic alternative to traditional suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) reliant on missiles or close-in engagements, thus reducing pilot and platform attrition in contested airspace. Empirical validation emerged through VAQ-133's initial tactical employment and combat deployment in 2024, where the system demonstrated utility in contexts involving contested operations, achieving initial operational capability (IOC) by December 2024. These operations underscored NGJ's capacity to maintain spectrum superiority against evolving threats, including those from proliferated precision-guided munitions and . U.S. Navy officials, such as Rear Adm. John Lemmon, position NGJ as a pivotal upgrade from legacy jammers, fostering agile electronic warfare that pivots toward offensive dominance and sustains deterrence by outpacing adversary adaptations in the electromagnetic domain. However, defense analysts highlight potential limitations stemming from the Growler's carrier dependency, arguing that concentrated electronic warfare assets aboard vulnerable platforms could be neutralized by asymmetric A2/AD salvos, and recommend diversifying with unmanned or land-based systems to distribute risk more effectively. This tension reflects broader debates on balancing centralized carrier with resilient, dispersed architectures in modern .

Export Potential and International Interest

The Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB) program involves cooperative development and production with the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF), enabling integration on Australia's EA-18G Growler fleet to align with U.S. Navy capabilities. In December 2024, received a for low-rate initial production of NGJ-MB pods, explicitly including units for both U.S. and Australian Growlers, highlighting Australia's role as the primary initial export partner. This collaboration adds international operational value and positions the system for broader allied adoption among F/A-18 Super Hornet operators, though U.S. export controls under the restrict full to vetted partners only. Indo-Pacific allies, particularly those confronting advanced Chinese anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) networks, have shown interest in NGJ-like capabilities to enhance electronic warfare resilience, with 's procurement serving as a model for potential co-development or adaptation. The pod's modular design facilitates integration on compatible platforms like the EA-18G, motivating members and partners to pursue analogous upgrades, though no formal NGJ exports beyond have been confirmed as of 2025. Future evolutions, such as the NGJ Mid-Band Expansion (NGJ-MBX), aim to extend frequency coverage against emerging threats; was awarded a $192 million in 2024 for its development, with potential inclusion in ongoing Australia collaborations to support export scalability. These variants could broaden appeal to allies operating Growler or similar assets by 2030, pending successful testing and relaxed export approvals, though integration with unmanned systems remains exploratory without committed international partnerships.

References

  1. https://www.navair.navy.mil/product/Next-Generation-Jammer
  2. https://www.navy.mil/Resources/Fact-Files/Display-FactFiles/Article/2395363/next-generation-jammer-mid-band/
  3. https://www.navair.navy.mil/news/US-Navy-declares-initial-operational-capability-Next-Generation-Jammer-Mid-Band-system/Mon
  4. https://www.rtx.com/raytheon/what-we-do/sea/ngj
  5. https://defensescoop.com/2025/01/09/navy-next-generation-jammer-mid-band-pod-reaches-critical-milestone-ioc/
  6. https://www.l3harris.com/all-capabilities/next-generation-jammer-low-band-ngj-lb
  7. https://www.l3harris.com/newsroom/press-release/2024/09/us-navy-awards-l3harris-587-million-contract-next-generation-jammer
  8. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2016/navy/2016ngj.pdf?ver=2019-08-22-105304-853
  9. https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/Article/1485456/technology-readiness-of-the-navys-next-generation-jammer-program-dodig-2018-098/
  10. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/FY_2023_SARS/NGJ%20Mid-Band%20MSAR%20Dec%202023.pdf
  11. https://nextgendefense.com/us-navy-next-gen-jammer/
  12. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/ngj-lb.htm
  13. https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2014/PSAR/Croxson.pdf
  14. https://www.forbes.com/sites/erictegler/2021/07/15/the-biggest-benefit-of-the-navys-next-generation-jammer-may-be-reliability/
  15. https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/defence-and-national-security-analysis/usns-next-generation-jammer-aims-to-field-digital-era-electronic-attack
  16. https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/next-generation-jammer-ngj.22452/
  17. https://seapowermagazine.org/us-navy-declares-initial-operational-capability-for-the-next-generation-jammer-mid-band-system/
  18. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44572.html
  19. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-the-us-navy-plans-crush-china-russias-air-defenses-20740
  20. https://www.jhuapl.edu/work/projects-and-missions/next-generation-jammer
  21. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2013-jul-09-la-fi-mo-navy-electronic-jammer-20130709-story.html
  22. https://apps.dtic.mil/descriptivesum/Y2013/Navy/stamped/0604274N_5_PB_2013.pdf
  23. https://blog.bliley.com/the-ngj-mission
  24. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%2520Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/FY_2023_SARS/NGJ%2520Mid-Band%2520MSAR%2520Dec%25202023.pdf
  25. https://raytheon.mediaroom.com/2019-08-05-Raytheon-delivers-first-Next-Generation-Jammer-Mid-Band-pod-for-Navy-testing
  26. https://www.rtx.com/news/news-center/2020/08/24/next-generation-jammer-mid-band-takes-to-the-skies-for-growler-flight-testing
  27. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/08/u-s-navy-receives-first-fleet-representative-ngj-mb-pods/
  28. https://www.navair.navy.mil/news/Next-Generation-Jammer-Mid-Band-receives-Milestone-C-approval/Mon-05312021-1858
  29. https://www.rtx.com/news/news-center/2025/05/16/rtxs-raytheon-awarded-580-million-production-contract-for-next-generation-jamme
  30. https://news.usni.org/2018/10/26/gao-denies-raytheon-next-generation-jammer-protest-navy-signs-contracts-l3-northrop
  31. https://ig.space/commslink/your-ultimate-guide-to-the-next-gen-jammer-ngj-program/
  32. https://insidedefense.com/share/212573
  33. https://defensescoop.com/2024/09/12/navy-awards-next-generation-jammer-low-band-l3-harris-airborne-electronic-attack/
  34. https://theaviationist.com/2023/09/05/ngj-lb-l3harris/
  35. https://thedefensepost.com/2025/01/08/us-navy-jammer-mid/
  36. https://aerospace.honeywell.com/us/en/about-us/press-release/2025/06/honeywell-selected-by-l3harris-to-support-next-gen-jammer-low-band
  37. https://janes.com/osint-insights/defence-and-national-security-analysis/usns-next-generation-jammer-aims-to-field-digital-era-electronic-attack
  38. https://www.mwrf.com/technologies/analog/mixed-signal/article/21845757/gan-based-aesas-enable-us-navys-next-generation-jammer
  39. https://base.imgix.net/files/base/ebm/mwrf/document/2019/03/mwrf_2970_special_report_2_1.pdf
  40. https://theaviationgeekclub.com/first-an-alq-249-next-generation-jammer-mid-band-pod-delivered-to-vx-23/
  41. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/ngj.htm
  42. https://theaviationist.com/2025/01/07/ngj-mb-initial-operational-capability/
  43. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2020/navy/2020ngj.pdf?ver=qbJhHGnd9wSCVF7_pxX8BA%253D%253D
  44. https://www.rtx.com/raytheon/news/2023/09/27/airborne-electronic-attack-owning-the-invisible-battlespace
  45. https://www.navysbir.com/15_1/149.htm
  46. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/ngj-hb.htm
  47. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%2520Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/FY_2022_SARS/NGJ_Mid-Band_SAR_DEC_2022_final.pdf
  48. https://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/33066-raytheons-next-generation-jammer-air-turbine-completes-initial-flight-testing
  49. https://atgi.us/next-gen-jammer-generator-eyed-for-other-uses/
  50. https://simpleflying.com/how-powerful-us-navy-alq-249-next-generation-jammer/
  51. https://rfhic.com/industries-defense-aerospace/electronic-warfare/the-future-of-modern-defense-with-gan-technology/
  52. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2022/navy/2022ngj-mb.pdf?ver=bbyEN5RCBH85WKtW-LQcVQ%253D%253D
  53. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%2520Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/FY_2022_SARS/NGJ_Low_Band_SAR_DEC_2022_final.pdf
  54. https://news.usni.org/2020/08/19/flight-tests-begin-on-next-generation-jammer-mid-band-pods-could-reach-milestone-c-this-fall
  55. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/08/raytheon-built-ngj-mb-takes-to-the-skies-for-ea-18g-growler-flight-testing/
  56. https://www.jedonline.com/2025/07/07/ftcn-replay-next-generation-jammer-mid-band-moves-from-development-to-deployment/
  57. https://aviationweek.com/defense/sensors-electronic-warfare/next-generation-jammer-seeks-new-platforms
  58. https://raytheon.mediaroom.com/2024-12-05-RTXs-Raytheon-awarded-590-million-production-contract-for-Next-Generation-Jammer-Mid-Band
  59. https://defence-blog.com/raytheon-awarded-590m-for-next-gen-navy-jammer/
  60. https://www.c4isrnet.com/electronic-warfare/2020/06/03/watchdog-discovers-problems-with-navy-jammer/
  61. https://insidedefense.com/insider/more-reliability-issues-trouble-ngj-mb-chief-weapons-tester-finds
  62. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2024/navy/2024ngj-mb.pdf
  63. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2023/navy/2023ngj-mb.pdf
  64. https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/4002733/vaq-133-wizards-complete-historic-first-next-generation-jammer-deployment-to-5t/
  65. https://insidedefense.com/insider/navy%25E2%2580%2599s-next-gen-jammer-reaches-ioc
  66. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-24-106831.pdf
  67. https://www.defensedaily.com/pentagon-weapons-tester-says-next-gen-jammer-issues-now-software-related-first-deployer-says-so-far-so-good/navy-usmc/
  68. https://theaviationist.com/2024/12/06/ngj-mb-pod-production-contract/
  69. https://insidedefense.com/insider/ngj-mb-iote-delays-continue
  70. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2023/navy/2023ngj-mb.pdf?ver=IxAp8LLxi_PIL32loQaMOQ%253D%253D
  71. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-13-642-highlights.pdf
  72. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-13-642
  73. https://defensescoop.com/2023/04/05/navy-adding-funds-to-increase-range-of-next-generation-jammer-capability/
  74. https://potomacofficersclub.com/news/next-generation-jammer-mid-band-risks-insufficient-testing-process/
  75. https://defensescoop.com/2023/01/26/lack-of-verified-digital-models-will-reduce-test-confidence-for-navy-jammer-pentagon-weapons-tester-says/
  76. https://www.twz.com/air/navy-growlers-next-generation-jamming-pod-went-to-war-on-its-first-cruise
  77. https://www.naval-technology.com/news/us-navy-ngj-mb/
  78. https://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/the-next-generation-jammer-and-distributed-electronic-warfare/
  79. https://www.naval-technology.com/news/raytheon-wins-590m-for-ea-18g-growler-jammer-production/
  80. https://theaviationist.com/2024/12/17/vaq-133-ngj/
  81. https://warontherocks.com/2016/07/the-threat-is-here-its-just-distributed-unevenly-a2ad-and-the-aircraft-carrier/
  82. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2024/november/better-airborne-tactical-electronic-warfare
  83. https://www.rtx.com/news/news-center/2024/10/01/rtxs-raytheon-awarded-u-s-navy-contract-for-next-generation-jammer-mid-band-exp
  84. https://www.stocktitan.net/news/RTX/rtx-s-raytheon-awarded-u-s-navy-contract-for-next-generation-jammer-viuazpkwb6rm.html
  85. https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/we-be-jammin-the-usas-next-generation-strike-jammer-015217/
  86. https://www.army-technology.com/features/look-us-navys-next-generation-jammer/
  87. https://www.naval-technology.com/news/rtxs-raytheon-contracted-for-us-navy-next-generation-jammer-mid-band-expansion/
  88. https://nextgendefense.com/us-navy-next-gen-jamming-system/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.