Hubbry Logo
Oeko-TexOeko-TexMain
Open search
Oeko-Tex
Community hub
Oeko-Tex
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Oeko-Tex
Oeko-Tex
Oeko-Tex
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Logo

Oeko-Tex is a registered trade mark of the International Association for Research and Testing in the Field of Textile and Leather Ecology. It is used to represent the product labels and company certificates issued by the Association.

Oeko-Tex labels and certificates confirm the safety of textile products and leather articles from all stages of production. Some also attest to social and environmental conditions in production facilities.[1][2]

History

[edit]

The Oeko-Tex Association was founded in March 1992 by the Austrian Textile Research Institute (now OETI - Institut fuer Oekologie, Technik und Innovation [de]) and the German Hohenstein Institute. The Swiss textile testing institute Testex joined in 1993. Other European and Asian testing and research institutes joined in the following years. In 2016, the association reached its current membership count of 17.[3]

In the first year of operation, Oeko-Tex launched Oeko-Tex Standard 100, which emerged from an earlier label developed by OETI in 1989.[1] In 1995, Oeko-Tex Standard 1000 was launched, which included sustainability aspects,[4][5] followed by Oeko-Tex Standard 100plus, which also examined production processes.[6][7]

At the beginning of the 2000s, Oeko-Tex Standard 1000 was scrutinized and social aspects and occupational safety were added.[8] As a result, in 2013, Oeko-Tex launched the STeP (Sustainable Textile Production) certification system for sustainable textile production.[5] In 2015, Oeko-Tex introduced Made in Green to replace the Oeko-Tex Standard 100plus and the Spanish Made in Green by AITEX labels.[9][10]

In 2023, Oeko-Tex launched the certification Organic Cotton.[11][12]

Concept

[edit]

The Oeko-Tex Association offers a certification system for companies to review and improve their supply chains. They are developed as a modular system to cover the textile and leather value chain in terms of input, process, and output control as well as supply chain management. The testing system is based on audits of production sites, testing in laboratories as well as evaluation of textile products.[13]

Oeko-Tex partners with initiatives such as Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHC). It is a member of the International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling Alliance (ISEAL Alliance [de])[14] and its labels operate in line with several Sustainable Development Goals.[15]

Operations

[edit]

The Oeko-Tex Association is headquartered in Zürich (Switzerland).[1] The association includes 17 test and research institutes in Europe and Japan, with offices in over 70 countries around the world (as of 2023).[16]

Oeko-Tex awards:

  • Product labels for textile products: Oeko-Tex Standard 100, Oeko-Tex Made in Green and Oeko-Tex Organic Cotton
  • Product label for leather articles: Oeko-Tex Leather Standard
  • Product label for textile and leather chemicals: Oeko-Tex Eco Passport, Oeko-Tex Made in Green
  • Certification for production sites: Oeko-Tex STeP
  • Certification for companies: Oeko-Tex Responsible Business

Most Oeko-Tex certification is conducted through the Standard 100 label. Within this standard, most articles tested are articles worn close to the skin in product class II (53% of all certificates), followed by baby articles in product class I (43%) as well as furnishing materials (3%, product class IV) and textiles without direct contact with the skin (1%, product class III) (as of 2011). In the 2018/19 fiscal year, the association awarded more than 21,000 Standard 100 certificates in over 104 countries. This was followed by around 1,333 products that were awarded the Made in Green label. In addition, 140 companies were certified in accordance with STeP. China is the country with the most STeP-certified companies, followed by Bangladesh and Pakistan, and then Turkey, followed by India.[10] In the 2022/23 fiscal year, Oeko-Tex issued more than 43,000 certificates and labels.[14] 21,000 manufacturers, brands and trading companies in more than 100 countries are working with the association and its labels and certifications (as of 2023).[17]

The Standard 100 is a product label for textiles tested for harmful substances with the largest prevalence worldwide. A consumer survey from 2012, conducted by the Institut für Handelsforschung GmbH, revealed that Oeko-Tex is one of the world's best-known textile labels. 42% of all respondents in 13 countries, including Germany, China and Russia, were familiar with the label. In Germany, the label had a recognition level of 70%.[4][18]

Oeko-Tex certificates

[edit]

Oeko-Tex Standard 100

[edit]

The Standard 100 product label, introduced in 1992, certifies adherence to the specifications of the standard by the same name, a document of testing methods and limit values for potentially harmful chemicals.[13] There are four product classes:

  • Product class I – Items for babies and infants (up to 36 months of age),
  • Product class II – Items with direct prolonged or large-area skin contact,
  • Product class III – Textiles without or with little skin contact,
  • Product class IV – Furnishing materials for decorative purposes (curtains, table linen, carpets, etc.).

Oeko-Tex STeP

[edit]

STeP (Sustainable Textile and Leather Production) is a worldwide certification system for production facilities in the textile, leather, and clothing industry. It is a 2013 re-branding of the Oeko-Tex Standard 1000 that had been introduced in 1995.[5] Once issued, the STeP certificate is valid for three years.[5][14][19]

Oeko-Tex Made in Green

[edit]

Made in Green is a label that certifies the testing of textile and leather products for harmful substances and materials, as well as evaluating environmental production and worklplace safety.[20][21] The Made in Green label replaced the former Oeko-Tex Standard 100plus label in 2015.[10][19] Product IDs and/or QR codes on the Made in Green label enable consumers to trace the production of the article.[9][22] The Made in Green label is valid for one year.[23]

Oeko-Tex Eco Passport

[edit]

Eco Passport is a certification system through which producers of textile and leather processing chemicals and chemical compounds can corroborate that their products are suitable for sustainable textile and leather production. The program features three sequential assessments, and products that pass all three steps are granted the Eco Passport certification. This label allows for those products to be used in Standard 100-certified products and by STeP-certified manufacturing plants.[24][14] The Eco Passport label can be issued to producers, traders, and resellers of chemicals and is valid for one year. It works in compliance with several regulations including EU REACH.[25]

Oeko-Tex Leather Standard

[edit]

The Leather Standard (introduced 2017) is a system of testing methods, testing criteria and limit values for harmful substances used by the Oeko-Tex member institutes to globally certify the human-ecological safety of leather products: semi-finished leather materials ("Wet blue" – chrome-tanned hides, "Wet white" – vegetable tanned hides), leather, bonded leather and ready-made leather articles. When certifying leather products contain non-leather (e.g. textile or metallic) components, the requirements of the Leather Standard are combined with those of the Standard 100.[26][27] Certification according to the Leather Standard is valid for one year.[28]

The Leather Standard defines the same four product classes as the Standard 100. Both also employ very similar catalogues of limit values for potentially harmful chemicals.[29]

Oeko-Tex Organic Cotton

[edit]

Fashion and textile products with the Organic Cotton label are made with organic cotton, grown without GMOs (genetically modified organisms) or pesticides, and were tested for other harmful substances. For the label, Oeko-Tex developed a method that can test quantitatively for genetically modified organisms.[30] For verification of organic origin, Oeko-Tex’s GMO quantification method differentiates between contamination and purposeful mixing of conventional cotton. The certification works in compliance with several regulations including EU REACH Annex XIV and XVII, US CPSIA (lead) and EU POP regulation.[14][11][12] The Oeko-Tex standards are modeled after the organic cotton standards by IFOAM – Organics International.[31]

Institutes

[edit]

The following institutes belong to the International Association for Research and Testing in the Field of Textile Ecology (Oeko-Tex):[16]

  • Aitex – Spanish Textile Research Centre (Spain),
  • Centexbel – Belgian Textile Research Centre (Belgium),
  • Centrocot – Centro Tessile Cotoniero e Abbigliamento S.p.A. (Italy),
  • Citeve – Centro Tecnológico das Indústrias Têxtil e do Vestuário de (Portugal),
  • DTI – Danish Technological Institute (Denmark),
  • FILK Freiberg Institute (Germany),
  • Hohenstein Institute (Germany),
  • IFTH – Institut Français du Textile et de l'Habillement (France),
  • Innovatext – Textile Engineering and Testing Institute (Hungary),
  • IW Textile Research Institute – Instytut Włókiennictwa (Poland),
  • Mirtec, Materials Industrial Research & Technology Center (Greece),
  • Nissenken Quality Evaluation Center (Japan),
  • ÖTI – Institut für Ökologie, Technik und Innovation GmbH (Austria),
  • Shirley Technologies Limited (United Kingdom),
  • Rise IVF AB – Research Institutes of Sweden (Sweden),
  • Testex AG (Switzerland),
  • Vutch-Chemitex (Slovakia).

Bibliography

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Oeko-Tex

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
OEKO-TEX® is an international association of independent research and testing institutes founded in that administers standards for textiles and leather products, primarily verifying the absence of harmful substances in finished goods to protect human health. The core OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 tests articles at all production stages for over 1,000 regulated and unregulated chemicals, including , pesticides, and , applying risk-based limit values that vary by product class—such as stricter thresholds for baby textiles—based on empirical data from toxicological assessments. Complementing this, OEKO-TEX® STeP certifies sustainable production processes by evaluating environmental management, chemical use, and social criteria across facilities, while MADE IN GREEN® tracks certified materials' supply chains for transparency and recyclability. With certifications issued by 18 member institutes worldwide and over 41,000 MADE IN GREEN® labels distributed by 2015, OEKO-TEX® has become a global benchmark for textile safety, though it faces criticism for emphasizing end-product testing over full lifecycle environmental impacts, potentially enabling greenwashing by firms highlighting certifications without addressing upstream pollution or labor issues. Instances of fraud, such as fake certificates in regions like , and rare revocations for code-of-conduct violations underscore enforcement challenges, yet the system's independent audits and annual re-testing maintain its credibility among manufacturers and consumers seeking verifiable safety data.

History

Founding and Initial Development (1992–2000)

The OEKO-TEX Association was established in March 1992 through a partnership between the in and the Austrian Textile Research Institute (OETI), with the Swiss institute Testex joining soon after. This founding responded to growing public and industry demands for verifiable safety in textiles, building on OETI's 1989 initiative "Schadstoffgeprüft nach ÖTN 100," which had tested products for pollutants but lacked international . The association's were set in Zurich, , to facilitate neutral oversight among European testing bodies. In April 1992, OEKO-TEX debuted publicly at the Interstoff trade fair in , launching the OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 certification as its core program. This standard introduced uniform limit values for over 100 harmful substances—such as , , and pesticides—tested via laboratory methods on raw materials, semi-finished, and finished textiles, categorized by intended use (e.g., baby products in Product Class I). By February 1993, the association formalized its governance statute under directors Raimar Freitag (Testex), Prof. Wilhelm Herzog (OETI), and Prof. Jürgen Mecheels (Hohenstein), enabling coordinated operations across member institutes. Early expansion efforts targeted global reach, with Testex establishing the association's first Asian contact office in April 1995 to support in high-production regions. In October 1995, OEKO-TEX introduced Standard 1000, extending to entire production facilities for compliance with environmental and social criteria, marking a shift toward process-level verification. Through the late 1990s, the association incorporated additional independent testing institutes, annually updated limit values based on new toxicological data and regulations (e.g., aligning with emerging EU directives on dyes), and issued thousands of certificates, fostering industry adoption amid rising scrutiny of chemical residues in apparel and home textiles.

Expansion and Key Milestones (2000–Present)

In the early 2000s, OEKO-TEX expanded its outreach through marketing initiatives, launching the "Feel good with OEKO-TEX®" campaign in April 2001 to promote human-ecological textiles using animal motifs, followed by a focus on baby products in January 2004 to highlight for sensitive . By September 2007, the organization participated in the ITMA exhibition with a redesigned stand to showcase its certifications internationally. Certificate issuance grew significantly, surpassing 10,000 valid OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 certificates within 12 months by November 2009, awarded to Anvil Knitwear in the , and reaching a cumulative certificates by 2011. This period marked initial scaling, with the 20th anniversary in April 2012 celebrated via campaigns including the Texolotl mascot and Sales Pro Games to boost global awareness. The 2010s saw programmatic expansion, including the launch of OEKO-TEX® STeP in July 2013 as a replacement for the scrutinized Standard 1000, focusing on sustainable production processes across environmental, social, and quality criteria. In August 2014, the MySTeP tool was introduced at Texworld for transparency. April 2015 brought the OEKO-TEX® MADE IN , combining product with via unique product IDs. April 2016 introduced OEKO-TEX® ECO for certifying sustainable chemicals, and October 2016 launched DETOX TO ZERO to align with Greenpeace's Detox campaign by reducing hazardous substances. February 2017 added the OEKO-TEX® LEATHER STANDARD for leather testing, while 2018 incorporated GMO-Check into STANDARD 100 for detecting genetically modified . The 25th anniversary in January 2017 underscored operational maturity, followed by MADE IN GREEN surpassing 5,000 labels by May 2021. In 2020, STANDARD 100 achieved 21,000 valid certificates. January 2022 introduced the STeP Impact Calculator for quantifying carbon emissions and water use; March 2022 marked the 30th anniversary; and November 2022 launched OEKO-TEX® RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS for . April 2023 debuted OEKO-TEX® for GMO-free verification, with OEKO-TEX joining the ISEAL community in January 2023 for . Recent growth reflects heightened demand, with over 43,000 certificates and labels issued in the 2022/2023 , a 21% increase from prior periods, accelerating twice as fast as growth since 2000. By 2024/2025, issuances exceeded 57,000, up 8%, including over 1,000 STeP certifications and more than 41,000 MADE IN GREEN labels since 2015. New 2025 regulations, effective April 1, tightened limits and added rules for STANDARD 100, alongside PFAS detection updates and criteria in STeP.

Organizational Structure

Governing Institutes and International Collaboration

The OEKO-TEX® Association, officially the International Association for Research and Testing in the Field of and Ecology, functions as the central governing entity, coordinating the development and implementation of standards across its member institutes. Established in 1992 in Zurich, , the association unites 17 independent and testing institutes, primarily located in and , to ensure uniform testing protocols for harmful substances in textiles and leather products. These governing institutes collectively define limit values, update criteria based on current scientific findings and regulatory developments, and oversee the issuance of certifications worldwide. Member institutes, such as Testex in , Hohenstein in , Shirley Technologies in the , and Nissenken in , conduct local testing while adhering to the association's harmonized standards, enabling consistent regardless of geographic origin. International collaboration is facilitated through the association's structure, which promotes joint , knowledge exchange, and alignment on ecological and benchmarks among the institutes. With contact offices in over 70 , supports global applicants by providing accessible services and fostering partnerships with industry stakeholders to advance sustainable practices in the chain. In the 2024/2025 period, this collaborative framework resulted in the issuance of over 57,000 certificates, reflecting an 8% year-over-year increase.

Operational and Testing Procedures

The OEKO-TEX Association operates through 17 independent, accredited testing and research institutes worldwide, which collectively manage and laboratory analyses for and products. These institutes adhere to a standardized operational framework that emphasizes modular applicable at every stage of the , from raw materials to finished goods, ensuring consistent application of testing protocols across global locations. Certification procedures begin with online registration and submission of an application form detailing product scope, accompanied by representative material samples sent to the selected institute. Following initial verification of the application and samples, institutes develop individualized measurement plans based on the product's risk category, then conduct laboratory testing and an on-site company inspection to assess compliance with production processes. Successful completion results in a one-year certificate, renewable annually through reapplication, updated sample testing, or verified factory controls, with non-compliance leading to suspension or revocation. Testing procedures prioritize the detection of harmful substance release from textiles under simulated use conditions, such as skin contact, perspiration, or oral exposure, to evaluate potential human absorption via skin, inhalation, or ingestion. Laboratories extract substances from samples using solvent-based methods, followed by quantitative analysis for over 1,000 parameters, including , , , pesticides, allergenic dyes, and perfluorinated compounds like PFOS and PFOA, with detection limits aligned to or stricter than regulations such as REACH and CPSIA. Limit values are tiered across four product classes—Product Class I (infant textiles with highest skin contact, strictest limits) to Class IV (furnishing materials with minimal contact, least stringent)—and are reviewed annually by the institutes to incorporate emerging scientific data and regulatory updates. Post-certification monitoring includes random factory audits, label verification via QR codes or certificate numbers through the OEKO-TEX Label Check system, and requirements for applicants to maintain internal quality controls, ensuring sustained adherence to criteria without reliance on self-declaration alone.

Core Concept and Scientific Basis

Principles of Testing for Harmful Substances

The principles of testing for harmful substances under OEKO-TEX STANDARD 100 emphasize the detection and quantification of chemicals that could pose health risks through skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion during textile use. Harmful substances are defined as those present in textiles or accessories that exceed established limit values or evolve under normal conditions of use, potentially injurious to human health based on prevailing scientific knowledge. Testing encompasses over 1,000 parameters, incorporating legally restricted substances such as those under REACH Annexes XVII and XIV, CPSIA, and the ECHA SVHC candidate list, alongside additional chemicals like heavy metals (e.g., lead, cadmium), formaldehyde, azo dyes capable of releasing carcinogenic arylamines, phthalates, PFAS (e.g., PFOA), pesticides, and allergenic dyes. The methodology prioritizes the releasable fraction of substances rather than total content, simulating real-world exposure scenarios such as skin contact, , or interaction to assess migration risks. Samples from all article components are analyzed in accredited laboratories using standardized extraction procedures and instrumental techniques including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and (HPLC), with a "worst-case" sampling approach targeting high-risk elements like darkest dyes or heaviest finishes. Limit values are calibrated by product class, reflecting exposure intensity:
Product ClassDescriptionExample Limit: Formaldehyde (mg/kg)Example Limit: Lead (mg/kg)
IItems for babies and toddlers up to 36 months≤16≤0.2
IIItems with prolonged skin contact (e.g., clothing)≤75≤1.0
IIIItems without or minimal skin contact (e.g., upholstery)≤150≤2.0
IVFurnishings and decoration materials≤300≤90
These thresholds exceed many statutory requirements and are updated annually to integrate emerging data from toxicological assessments and regulatory changes. Validation relies on empirical laboratory results cross-checked against criteria, with certifications requiring on-site inspections and modular testing across production stages to ensure consistency. While the approach grounds limits in exposure-based , it does not cover biological or mechanical hazards, focusing solely on chemical residues verifiable through reproducible analytics.

Limit Values, Risk Categories, and Empirical Validation

The OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 establishes limit values for over 1,000 harmful substances across categories including pesticides, , , azo colorants, , and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), with thresholds typically expressed in mg/kg or µg/kg of textile material. These values are derived from toxicological assessments of exposure risks, often exceeding mandatory regulatory limits such as those in REACH or CPSIA to account for precautionary principles in human health protection. For instance, limits range from 16 mg/kg in the strictest category to 300 mg/kg in less sensitive applications, while extractable like lead are capped at 0.2 mg/kg and at 0.1 mg/kg in high-risk classes. Annual updates incorporate emerging scientific data, such as tightened PFAS screening via total fluorine limits and reductions in thresholds from 100 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg as of 2025. Risk categories are delineated into four product classes, reflecting differential exposure potentials based on intended use, skin contact duration, and user vulnerability. Product Class I applies to items for infants and toddlers up to 36 months, imposing the most stringent limits due to heightened sensitivity and mouthing behaviors; Class II covers textiles with prolonged skin contact like and ; Class III includes outerwear with minimal direct contact; and Class IV addresses furnishings such as curtains and with indirect exposure. This classification ensures risk-proportional thresholds, with Class I limits often 5-10 times stricter than Class IV for substances like and .
Product ClassDescriptionExample ApplicationsRisk Basis
IHighest sensitivityBaby clothing, Direct /mouth contact in vulnerable groups
IIDirect contact, Prolonged exposure to adults/children
IIIMinimal contactJackets, liningsLow transfer risk
IVDecorative/furnishingsCurtains, Incidental/indirect contact
Empirical validation of these limits relies on standardized extraction protocols simulating human physiological conditions (e.g., sweat, , or artificial per ISO 105 standards), followed by quantitative analysis using validated instrumental methods such as (HPLC), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and (ICP-MS) for trace detection. Limit thresholds are set via dose-response evaluations from toxicological literature, factoring in absorption routes (dermal, , ) and no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAEL), with precautionary margins applied beyond legal minima. Proficiency is ensured through interlaboratory comparisons among over 20 accredited OEKO-TEX® institutes and annual audits, though independent peer-reviewed studies confirm method reliability in detecting residuals like at sub-ppm levels while noting potential variability in complex matrices. Updates, effective from dates like April 1, 2024, for new SVHC integrations, reflect ongoing empirical refinements from global regulatory and research inputs.

Certification Programs

OEKO-TEX Standard 100

OEKO-TEX Standard 100, launched in 1992, certifies textiles and related materials as free from harmful substances that pose risks to , covering the entire production chain from raw materials like yarns to finished products. The standard establishes limit values for over 1,000 regulated substances, including , , pesticides, carcinogenic or allergenic dyes, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), derived from toxicological assessments and aligned with regulations such as the European REACH directive and U.S. CPSIA. These limits are set below levels deemed safe based on empirical risk data, with annual reviews incorporating new scientific findings to ensure ongoing relevance. Testing under the standard applies risk-based criteria across four product classes, differentiated by intended use and potential contact intensity, with progressively stricter limits for classes involving higher vulnerability:
  • Product Class I: For babies and toddlers up to 36 months, encompassing items like diapers and sleepwear; requires the lowest allowable substance concentrations due to sensitive and behaviors like mouthing. For diapers, testing focuses on textile components for direct skin contact materials to prevent irritation or chemical residues, bleaching processes to minimize dioxin risks, absorbency core additives where applicable to certified materials, and limits on substances such as phthalates and PFAS indicators, emphasizing avoidance of fragrances, parabens, lotions, and latex in relevant textile elements.
  • Product Class II: For articles with prolonged contact, such as and .
  • Product Class III: For items with minimal direct contact, including outerwear like jackets.
  • Product Class IV: For furnishing materials like curtains and upholstery, which have indirect or furnishing-specific exposure.
Manufacturers may voluntarily certify to a higher class for broader applicability. All components, including trims, buttons, and prints, must comply, with laboratory analysis using methods like and spectrometry to quantify substances against class-specific thresholds, such as a 2025 update reducing (BPA) to 10 mg/kg across classes based on toxicological consultations. Certification involves submitting an online application to one of OEKO-TEX's 18 independent member institutes, providing product samples for accredited lab testing, and undergoing factory inspections to verify production controls. Successful applicants receive a one-year certificate, renewable annually with re-testing of representative samples and risk-based monitoring; non-compliance in output controls can lead to suspension. The process emphasizes verifiable absence of harmful residues rather than process inputs, distinguishing it from environmental standards, though it incentivizes safer chemical use through linked programs like OEKO-TEX Eco Passport. As of 2025, binding updates include tightened PFAS and limits, reflecting causal links to health risks like endocrine disruption established in peer-reviewed .

OEKO-TEX STeP

OEKO-TEX® STeP, which stands for Sustainable and Production, is a modular system introduced in 2013 for production facilities in the , , and related industrial sectors. It verifies compliance with criteria spanning environmental management, chemical handling, , , and occupational health and safety, aiming to promote verifiable practices throughout the production chain. Unlike product-focused labels, STeP targets facility-level processes to ensure ongoing improvements in resource efficiency, waste reduction, and worker protections. The certification evaluates performance across six core modules: Chemical Management, which mandates safe handling, storage, and substitution of hazardous substances in line with legal and OEKO-TEX® guidelines; Environmental Performance, assessing metrics like , usage, emissions, and generation with quantitative benchmarks; Environmental Management, requiring systematic planning, monitoring, and reporting of ecological impacts; , covering fair labor practices, anti-discrimination policies, and prevention of child or forced labor; , focusing on process controls, defect reduction, and supply chain ; and Health & Safety, enforcing risk assessments, training, and protective measures against workplace hazards. Facilities must achieve defined limit values in each module, with flexibility for recognition of equivalent third-party standards such as ISO 14001 for environmental management. The begins with a via an online platform, followed by document review and an independent on-site by accredited OEKO-TEX® institutes to verify and identify non-conformities. Corrective action plans address deficiencies, with follow-up audits ensuring sustained compliance; successful completion yields a three-year certificate, subject to annual self-declarations and potential spot checks. Certified facilities gain access to tools like the OEKO-TEX® Impact Calculator for measuring carbon and footprints per step or material unit, facilitating data-driven optimizations. As of 2023, over 1,000 production facilities worldwide held STeP , reflecting adoption primarily in and among manufacturers seeking to demonstrate responsibility to brands and regulators. In September 2025, the standard was updated to incorporate protection, requiring facilities to conduct ecosystem impact assessments and prioritize sustainable sourcing to minimize disruption, aligning with emerging regulatory pressures on environmental externalities. This evolution builds on empirical tracking of reductions in resource use among certified sites, though independent validation of long-term outcomes remains tied to self-reported data audited by OEKO-TEX® partners.

OEKO-TEX Made in Green

OEKO-TEX® MADE IN GREEN is a label introduced in April 2015 that verifies textiles and articles for safety, environmental , and throughout their production chain. It requires prior under OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100, , or STANDARD to confirm the absence of harmful substances such as carcinogenic dyes and , alongside of all making-up facilities to OEKO-TEX® STeP standards for sustainable production processes. Additionally, components comprising 5% or more of the product's weight must originate from STeP-certified facilities handling wet or chemical processes to ensure chemical management and wastewater quality. The label emphasizes via a unique product ID and , accessible through the OEKO-TEX® Label Check app, allowing consumers to verify the supply chain's environmental data, including and emissions, as well as social compliance such as fair wages, prohibition of or forced labor, and safe working conditions. involves application through the myOEKO-TEX® platform, supplier verification, article definition, and annual renewal, with labels valid for one year but traceable for up to five years; non-compliance can lead to revocation. Criteria are updated annually to align with scientific advancements and legal requirements, focusing on verifiable reductions in environmental impact without mandating full lifecycle assessment. Since its launch, motivated in part by the 2013 to promote transparency, the label has seen significant adoption, with over 43,000 labels issued to more than 9,200 manufacturers across 88 countries by 2025. In 2024 alone, 16,927 labels were granted, reflecting 52% year-over-year growth, primarily in apparel and home textiles from regions including , , , and ; consumer scans exceeded 300,000 that year, indicating rising market trust. It has been recognized by entities such as the Centre's Standards Map and Greenpeace's 2018 label guide, though its self-regulatory nature relies on audited facility data rather than independent environmental impact measurements.

OEKO-TEX Eco Passport and Leather Standard

The OEKO-TEX® ECO PASSPORT is an independent certification system that verifies chemicals, colourants, auxiliaries, and accessories used in textile, leather, and footwear production as compliant with ecological and toxicological criteria, ensuring reduced environmental impact and regulatory adherence. Certification requires screening via CAS numbers against a restricted substances list (RSL), laboratory analysis by OEKO-TEX®-approved institutes for over 100 parameters, self-assessments, and potential on-site evaluations, with exclusion for products failing to meet limit values derived from regulations like REACH Annexes XVII and XIV, CPSIA, and ECHA-SVHC. Certificates are valid for one year, subject to annual renewal and limit value reviews, and align with ZDHC MRSL Levels 1–3 for wastewater and emissions management. As of 2025, the program expanded to include commodity chemicals beyond textile-specific applications and requires biodegradability verification, enhancing traceability for downstream certifications like STANDARD 100 or STeP. The OEKO-TEX® LEATHER STANDARD certifies finished articles, including materials, , and products like bags or , as free from harmful substances and safe for human health across production stages. It tests against a catalog exceeding 1,000 substances, including azo dyes, , and pesticides, with limit values stricter for skin-contact items and compliant with global standards such as REACH and ECHA lists; product classes range from raw hides to assembled goods, with modular avoiding retesting of pre-certified components. The process involves sample submission to accredited labs, factory audits, and detailed reporting, yielding one-year certificates renewable annually following limit value updates. From January 2025, mandatory proof of origin documentation supports compliance with the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), verifying sustainable sourcing to mitigate risks like . ECO PASSPORT and LEATHER STANDARD interconnect as input-output controls: certified chemicals under ECO PASSPORT enable production of LEATHER STANDARD-compliant leathers by ensuring auxiliary safety from the outset, reducing residual contaminants in final products and facilitating transparency without redundant testing. Both emphasize empirical testing over self-declaration, with over 35,000 companies in the OEKO-TEX® network leveraging them for market access in regulated regions, though efficacy depends on consistent enforcement rather than label alone. The OEKO-TEX® certification verifies textiles containing at least 70% , ensuring from farm to finished product through independent audits and testing for genetically modified organisms (GMOs), pesticides, and other prohibited substances. This label applies to raw materials, intermediate products, and end items at any production stage, distinguishing it from broader organic standards by emphasizing alongside organic fiber verification. Introduced in 2023, the certification addresses consumer demand for verifiable organic claims without relying solely on fiber origin certificates, incorporating OEKO-TEX®'s established testing protocols for harmful substances like azo colorants and . Related initiatives under OEKO-TEX® integrate with sustainability-focused programs, such as MADE IN GREEN, which recognizes it as a qualifying product certificate alongside STANDARD 100 for environmentally responsible manufacturing. Effective April 1, 2025, OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 certificates will exclude explicit "GMO-free" or "organic cotton" claims to avoid overlap, directing such verifications to the dedicated label. These efforts promote regenerative farming practices, , and through partnerships with suppliers, though they do not encompass full supply chain social or environmental audits typical of standards like GOTS. The certification's scope remains focused on cotton blends and excludes comprehensive lifecycle assessments, positioning it as a targeted tool for toxin-free organic textiles rather than a holistic framework. As of 2025, it supports industry transparency by requiring documented evidence of compliance, with annual re-verification to maintain label integrity.

Criticisms and Limitations

Inadequacies in Environmental Lifecycle Coverage

OEKO-TEX® certifications, such as STANDARD 100, emphasize testing finished textiles for harmful substances but do not assess upstream environmental impacts in production, including and application in conventional cultivation or in manufacturing. This gap persists even for fibers like viscose or , which involve chemical-intensive processes and dependency, respectively, without mandates for reduced ecological footprints in sourcing. Production-stage evaluations under OEKO-TEX® STeP address site-specific metrics like energy use and , yet fall short of requiring gate-to-cradle or full life cycle assessments (LCAs) that quantify cumulative effects across global supply chains, such as regional or emissions from and finishing. Broader ecolabelling trends, including OEKO-TEX® programs, often prioritize over comprehensive process impacts, limiting coverage of indirect factors like biodiversity degradation or GMO-related . Downstream lifecycle elements, including product use-phase energy (e.g., laundering) and end-of-life disposal or recyclability, receive no standardized scrutiny, allowing certified items to overlook long-term contributions to or microplastic from synthetics. OEKO-TEX® tools like the Carbon Impact Calculator provide screening-level insights rather than rigorous, ISO 14040-compliant LCAs, which are costlier and reveal fuller environmental burdens such as transportation-related greenhouse gases. These limitations contrast with certifications like GOTS, which enforce , , and environmental management systems throughout the , highlighting OEKO-TEX®'s narrower scope on substance safety over holistic sustainability. Critics argue this enables selective certification of individual products or materials, potentially masking unsustainable practices in uncertified segments of the lifecycle and facilitating greenwashing claims of overall eco-friendliness.

Greenwashing Risks and Industry Self-Regulation Concerns

Critics contend that OEKO-TEX enables greenwashing by allowing brands to project an image of comprehensive while addressing only a narrow aspect of product , namely the testing of harmful chemical residues in finished textiles rather than broader environmental impacts during production or across the . For instance, the OEKO-TEX STANDARD 100 label verifies low levels of substances like and azo dyes in end products but does not evaluate worker exposure to toxins during manufacturing or the ecological footprint of raw material extraction, potentially misleading consumers into assuming full eco-friendliness. A 2023 report by the Changing Markets Foundation highlights this limitation, noting that "the label only covers chemical residues present in the end product; it does not consider exposure to harmful substances during the production process." This risk is exacerbated by documented cases where certifications have been granted despite evident non-compliance with even the scheme's own restricted substance lists. In one example, OEKO-TEX awarded its MADE IN GREEN label to Chinese viscose producer Sateri Fujian in 2022, despite the facility's use of (CS₂)—a neurotoxic chemical banned under OEKO-TEX's restricted substances list (MRSL)—due to claims of technological unavailability of substitutes. Such instances underscore how the certification's flexibility can permit ongoing use of hazardous processes, undermining claims of rigorous standards and allowing brands to market products as "" without substantive changes. Additionally, as a paid, voluntary program, OEKO-TEX incentivizes participation for marketing purposes without mandating holistic reforms, such as reducing or ensuring , which critics argue facilitates exaggerated narratives. Concerns over stem from OEKO-TEX's structure as an association of testing institutes with ties to stakeholders, which may prioritize commercial viability over stringent enforcement. Verification processes often rely on company self-assessments and periodic audits by affiliated institutes, lacking mandatory independent third-party oversight for all elements, such as chemical pre-approvals or full transaction certificates. While OEKO-TEX has made self-assessments mandatory for programs like ECO PASSPORT since April 2023, this shift has drawn scrutiny for potentially reducing accountability, as it depends on self-reported data without guaranteed on-site validation. A 2023 analysis of voluntary schemes criticizes such systems for limited stakeholder consultation in standard revisions and insufficient transparency, arguing they act as a "smokescreen" that delays binding legislation by fostering reliance on industry-led initiatives. These features raise questions about and the scheme's ability to drive genuine causal improvements in environmental outcomes, as opposed to superficial compliance.

Impact and Reception

Market Adoption and Economic Effects

OEKO-TEX certifications have seen substantial global adoption, with over 35,000 and companies relying on its certificates and labels for verification and product safety assurance as of . In the 2024/2025 financial year, the organization issued 57,412 certificates and labels, marking an 8% increase from the prior year and reflecting growing demand for transparency in production processes. This expansion included particularly strong uptake in niche areas, such as certification, which surged 127% year-over-year, underscoring its role in facilitating sustainable sourcing across diverse markets. Economically, the certification system supports by enabling compliance with international regulatory requirements and preferences for verified safe and , thereby reducing trade barriers for participating firms. The issuance of over 40,000 certifications for chemical products under OEKO-TEX ECO PASSPORT by mid-2024 highlights its integration into upstream supply chains, potentially lowering costs associated with chemical testing and substitution for manufacturers. While direct revenue figures for certified textiles remain proprietary, the 22% year-over-year growth in total certificates during 2023/2024—from 43,000 to over 50,000—correlates with broader industry shifts toward verified , aiding exporters in competitive markets like and .

Evidence of Health and Safety Outcomes

Oeko-Tex certifications, particularly Standard 100, establish limit values for over 100 harmful substances in textiles, including , azo dyes, , , and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), with thresholds derived from toxicological data and regulatory standards to minimize dermal exposure risks. These limits aim to prevent acute irritations, allergic reactions, and potential carcinogenic or endocrine-disrupting effects associated with elevated levels of such chemicals in non-certified products. For instance, , a known skin sensitizer, has been linked to in clothing exposure studies, with certified textiles required to maintain levels below 16 mg/kg for products in direct skin contact. Independent comparative analyses of chemical residues in certified versus non-certified textiles confirm lower concentrations of regulated substances in Oeko-Tex products, though comprehensive peer-reviewed studies quantifying real-world exposure reductions across broad populations remain scarce. Recent updates to certification criteria, such as reducing the PFAS total fluorine limit to 100 mg/kg in 2024 for certain apparel and to 10 mg/kg in , reflect ongoing adaptations to emerging evidence of and health risks like immune suppression and developmental . However, epidemiological data tying to measurable declines in consumer health issues—such as reduced prevalence or cancer incidence from textile-derived exposures—are absent, as most focuses on occupational settings or general chemical risks rather than certification-specific outcomes. Critically, while certifications correlate with compliance to benchmarks, thresholds may not eliminate all risks, particularly for untested or novel chemicals, and do not address cumulative exposures from multiple sources. Observational patterns, such as lower rates in regions with stringent limits akin to Oeko-Tex standards, suggest potential protective effects, but causal attribution requires further longitudinal studies. Overall, the framework supports precautionary reduction of known hazards, yet of enhanced and outcomes relies more on inferred exposure than verified clinical benefits.

Recent Developments

Regulatory Updates and Certification Growth (2023–2025)

In 2023, the OEKO-TEX Association implemented updates to its criteria, notably requiring mandatory self-assessments for all production sites under the ECO PASSPORT standard, previously voluntary. These changes aimed to enhance transparency in chemical across supply chains. Concurrently, certification volume grew significantly, with over 43,000 certificates and labels issued in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, marking a 21% increase from the prior year. By 2024, further revisions to test criteria and limit values were introduced, including a reduced threshold of 100 mg/kg for specific substances across STANDARD 100, ECO PASSPORT, LEATHER STANDARD, and certifications, effective January 1. Restrictions on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were also tightened to address emerging health concerns from scientific data. This period saw accelerated adoption, as OEKO-TEX issued more than 50,000 certificates between July 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024—a 22% rise—reflecting heightened industry demand for verifiable safety assurances amid regulatory pressures like EU REACH amendments. In 2025, updates effective April 1 eliminated "GMO-free" and claims from STANDARD 100 certificates to avoid overlapping with dedicated certifications, while imposing stricter limits on (BPA) and expanding PFAS scrutiny in textiles and leathers. An additional revision on October 6 banned all biologically active products in certified articles due to potential health risks. Certification growth moderated but remained positive, with 57,412 certificates issued in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, an 8% increase, driven by expansions in chemical certifications and broader supply chain integration. These annual adjustments align OEKO-TEX criteria with advancing toxicological research and international standards, though as a voluntary scheme, they supplement rather than supplant binding regulations.

References

  1. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/about-us/our-story/
  2. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/oeko-tex-standard-100/
  3. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/press-releases/30-years-of-expertise-as-a-foundation-for-the-future/
  4. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/oeko-tex-step/
  5. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/
  6. https://www.asparagusmagazine.com/articles/know-logo-asks-if-oeko-tex-textile-certification-indicates-eco-friendly-fabrics-and-fashion
  7. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/oeko-tex-response-re-use-of-certification-scheme-at-factory-linked-to-labour-rights-violations/
  8. https://www.the-spin-off.com/news/stories/The-Materials-Do-seals-and-certificates-protect-against-greenwashing-accusations-16751
  9. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/press-releases/oeko-tex-annual-report-2022-2023-press-release/
  10. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/press-releases/oeko-tex-annual-report-2024-2025-press-release/
  11. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/press-releases/oeko-tex-new-regulations-2025-press-release/
  12. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/about-us/organisation/
  13. http://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/oeko-texr
  14. https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/sustainability/at-oeko-tex-evolving-material-certification-strategies/
  15. https://www.testex.com/en
  16. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/about-us/offices/
  17. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/oeko-tex-standard-100
  18. https://www.oeko-tex.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Marketing_Materialien/STANDARD_100/FAQs/FAQ_STANDARD_100_EN_ES_01.2019.pdf
  19. https://www.hohenstein.us/en-us/oeko-tex/output-control/standard-100/apply
  20. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/blog/why-testing-for-harmful-substance-in-textiles-matters
  21. https://www.oeko-tex.com/importedmedia/downloadfiles/OEKO-TEX_STANDARD_100_Standard_EN_DE.pdf
  22. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2020/5084062
  23. https://www.oeko-tex.com/fileadmin/user_upload/New_Regulations/2025/New_regulations_2025_OEKO-TEX_Limit_values_EN.pdf
  24. https://www.images-magazine.com/oeko-tex-standards-updates-organic-cotton-harmful-chemicals/
  25. https://www.hohenstein.us/en-us/oeko-tex/output-control/standard-100
  26. https://www.oeko-tex.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Marketing_Materialien/STANDARD_100/Factsheet/STANDARD_100/OEKO-TEX_STANDARD_100_Factsheet_EN.pdf
  27. https://www.compliancegate.com/oeko-tex-standard-100/
  28. https://managementsystems.world/standard/oeko-tex-standard-100
  29. https://www.oeko-tex.com/importedmedia/downloadfiles/OEKO-TEX_STANDARD100_Testing_Methods_EN_ZH-HANS.pdf
  30. https://contractlaboratory.com/oeko-tex-standard-100-certification-testing/
  31. https://www.hohenstein.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Test_Standards/OEKO-TEX/OEKO-TEX_Testing_Methods_STANDARD_100_EN.pdf
  32. https://www.oeko-tex.com/fileadmin/user_upload/New_Regulations/2024/New_regulations_2024_OEKO-TEX_Limit_values_EN.pdf
  33. https://waschies.com/en/blogs/stories/oeko-tex-certified
  34. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/oeko-tex-standard-100/supplements/
  35. https://specialtyfabricsreview.com/2025/01/23/oeko-tex/
  36. https://www.hohenstein.us/en-us/oeko-tex/output-control/standard-100/faq
  37. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/blog/behind-the-scenes-the-step-facility-certification-process/
  38. https://www.testex.com/en/oeko-tex/step
  39. https://www.hohenstein.us/en-us/oeko-tex/process-control/step
  40. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/oeko-tex-step/impact-calculator/
  41. https://www.just-style.com/news/oeko-tex-step-certification-achieved-in-over-1000-facilities/
  42. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/infocenter/oeko-tex-step-standard-update-september-2025/
  43. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/oeko-tex-made-in-green/
  44. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/press-releases/oeko-tex-made-in-green-marks-a-decade-as-a-global-sustainability-label/
  45. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/oeko-tex-eco-passport/
  46. https://www.oeko-tex.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Marketing_Materialien/ECO_PASSPORT/Standard/OEKO-TEX_ECO_PASSPORT_Standard_EN.pdf
  47. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/oeko-tex-leather-standard/
  48. https://www.oeko-tex.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Marketing_Materialien/LEATHER_STANDARD/B2B_Brochure/OEKO-TEX_LEATHER_STANDARD_B2B_Brochure_EN_Web_compressed.pdf
  49. https://www.testex.com/en/news/oeko-tex-eco-passport-and-standard-100-how-products-are-assessed
  50. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/oeko-tex-organic-cotton/
  51. https://www.hohenstein.us/en-us/oeko-tex/organic-cotton
  52. https://www.testex.com/en/oeko-tex/organic-cotton
  53. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmLakTu3wxU
  54. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/about-us/engagement/
  55. https://theroundup.org/what-is-oeko-tex-and-does-it-really-matter/
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916121000244
  57. https://www.oeko-tex.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Marketing_Materialien/STeP/Factsheet/OEKO-TEX_STeP_Factsheet_EN.pdf
  58. https://www.just-style.com/news/oeko-tex-introduces-carbon-impact-calculator-for-apparel/
  59. https://www.coyuchi.com/blogs/journal/gots-vs-oeko-tex
  60. https://begood.eco/sustainable-fashion/gots-vs-oeko-tex-whats-the-difference/
  61. https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/THE_FALSE_PROMISE_OF_CERTIFICATION_FINAL_WEB.pdf
  62. https://remake.world/stories/toxic-greenwashing/
  63. https://ecostandard.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/TextileVSS-white-paper-ECOS_July23.pdf
  64. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/press-releases/oeko-tex-new-regulations-2023/press/
  65. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/press-releases/oeko-tex-annual-report-2023-2024-press-release/
  66. https://www.oicompass.com/csr-and-sustainability/oeko-tex-reports-8-certificate-growth-in-2024/25/116523.article
  67. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40482050/
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9318620/
  69. https://www.qeios.com/read/0GADTB
  70. https://www.exponent.com/article/oeko-tex-reduces-pfas-limits-textiles-leather
  71. https://www.hohenstein.us/en-us/press/press-releases/oeko-tex-new-regulations-2025
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147651320304334
  73. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c05175
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393320372_Unfinished_business_formaldehyde_exposure_from_uniforms_and_the_case_for_US_textile_regulation
  75. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/press-releases/oeko-tex-new-regulations-2024-press-release/
  76. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/oeko-tex-tightens-pfas-ban-170000443.html
  77. https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/news/infocenter/standard-updates-per-06102025/
  78. https://www.hohenstein.us/en-us/oeko-tex/annual-updates
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.