Hubbry Logo
OpenVZOpenVZMain
Open search
OpenVZ
Community hub
OpenVZ
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
OpenVZ
OpenVZ
OpenVZ
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
OpenVZ
DevelopersVirtuozzo and OpenVZ community
Initial release2005; 20 years ago (2005)
Repository
Written inC
Operating systemLinux
Platformx86, x86-64
Available inEnglish
TypeOS-level virtualization
LicenseGPLv2
Websiteopenvz.org

OpenVZ (Open Virtuozzo) is an operating-system-level virtualization technology for Linux. It allows a physical server to run multiple isolated operating system instances, called containers, virtual private servers (VPSs), or virtual environments (VEs). OpenVZ is similar to Solaris Containers and LXC.

OpenVZ compared to other virtualization technologies

[edit]

While virtualization technologies such as VMware, Xen and KVM provide full virtualization and can run multiple operating systems and different kernel versions, OpenVZ uses a single Linux kernel and therefore can run only Linux. All OpenVZ containers share the same architecture and kernel version. This can be a disadvantage in situations where guests require different kernel versions from that of the host. However, as it does not have the overhead of a true hypervisor, it is very fast and efficient.[1]

Memory allocation with OpenVZ is soft in that memory not used in one virtual environment can be used by others or for disk caching. While old versions of OpenVZ used a common file system (where each virtual environment is just a directory of files that is isolated using chroot), current versions of OpenVZ allow each container to have its own file system.[2]

Kernel

[edit]

The OpenVZ kernel is a Linux kernel, modified to add support for OpenVZ containers. The modified kernel provides virtualization, isolation, resource management, and checkpointing. As of vzctl 4.0, OpenVZ can work with unpatched Linux 3.x kernels, with a reduced feature set.[3]

Virtualization and isolation

[edit]

Each container is a separate entity, and behaves largely as a physical server would. Each has its own:

Files
System libraries, applications, virtualized /proc and /sys, virtualized locks, etc.
Users and groups
Each container has its own root user, as well as other users and groups.
Process tree
A container only sees its own processes (starting from init). PIDs are virtualized, so that the init PID is 1 as it should be.
Network
Virtual network device, which allows a container to have its own IP addresses, as well as a set of netfilter (iptables), and routing rules.
Devices
If needed, any container can be granted access to real devices like network interfaces, serial ports, disk partitions, etc.
IPC objects
Shared memory, semaphores, messages.

Resource management

[edit]

OpenVZ resource management consists of four components: two-level disk quota, fair CPU scheduler, disk I/O scheduler, and user bean counters (see below). These resources can be changed during container run time, eliminating the need to reboot.

Two-level disk quota
Each container can have its own disk quotas, measured in terms of disk blocks and inodes (roughly number of files). Within the container, it is possible to use standard tools to set UNIX per-user and per-group disk quotas.
CPU scheduler
The CPU scheduler in OpenVZ is a two-level implementation of fair-share scheduling strategy.On the first level, the scheduler decides which container it is to give the CPU time slice to, based on per-container cpuunits values. On the second level the standard Linux scheduler decides which process to run in that container, using standard Linux process priorities. It is possible to set different values for the CPUs in each container. Real CPU time will be distributed proportionally to these values. In addition, OpenVZ provides ways to set strict CPU limits, such as 10% of a total CPU time (--cpulimit), limit number of CPU cores available to container (--cpus), and bind a container to a specific set of CPUs (--cpumask).[4]
I/O scheduler
Similar to the CPU scheduler described above, I/O scheduler in OpenVZ is also two-level, utilizing Jens Axboe's CFQ I/O scheduler on its second level. Each container is assigned an I/O priority, and the scheduler distributes the available I/O bandwidth according to the priorities assigned. Thus no single container can saturate an I/O channel.
User Beancounters
User Beancounters is a set of per-container counters, limits, and guarantees, meant to prevent a single container from monopolizing system resources. In current OpenVZ kernels (RHEL6-based 042stab*) there are two primary parameters, and others are optional.[5] Other resources are mostly memory and various in-kernel objects such as Inter-process communication shared memory segments and network buffers. Each resource can be seen from /proc/user_beancounters and has five values associated with it: current usage, maximum usage (for the lifetime of a container), barrier, limit, and fail counter. The meaning of barrier and limit is parameter-dependent; in short, those can be thought of as a soft limit and a hard limit. If any resource hits the limit, the fail counter for it is increased. This allows the owner to detect problems by monitoring /proc/user_beancounters in the container.

Checkpointing and live migration

[edit]

A live migration and checkpointing feature was released for OpenVZ in the middle of April 2006. This makes it possible to move a container from one physical server to another without shutting down the container. The process is known as checkpointing: a container is frozen and its whole state is saved to a file on disk. This file can then be transferred to another machine and a container can be unfrozen (restored) there; the delay is roughly a few seconds. Because state is usually preserved completely, this pause may appear to be an ordinary computational delay.

Limitations

[edit]

By default, OpenVZ restricts container access to real physical devices (thus making a container hardware-independent). An OpenVZ administrator can enable container access to various real devices, such as disk drives, USB ports,[6] PCI devices[7] or physical network cards.[8]

/dev/loopN is often restricted in deployments (as loop devices use kernel threads which might be a security issue), which restricts the ability to mount disk images. A work-around is to use FUSE.

OpenVZ is limited to providing only some VPN technologies based on PPP (such as PPTP/L2TP) and TUN/TAP. IPsec is supported inside containers since kernel 2.6.32.

A graphical user interface called EasyVZ was attempted in 2007,[9] but it did not progress beyond version 0.1. Up to version 3.4, Proxmox VE could be used as an OpenVZ-based server virtualization environment with a GUI, although later versions switched to LXC.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

OpenVZ

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
OpenVZ is an open-source container-based virtualization technology for that enables a single physical server to host multiple secure, isolated —also known as virtual private servers (VPS) or virtual environments—by sharing the host's kernel for efficient resource utilization and high density. The project originated in 1999 when SWsoft's chief scientist outlined key components of container technology, including isolation, filesystem separation, and resource controls, leading to the development of a prototype mockup by a small team in early 2000. In January 2002, SWsoft released the initial commercial version as Virtuozzo for , which underwent public beta testing starting in July 2000 and supported thousands of virtual environments by that summer. On October 4, 2005, SWsoft launched the OpenVZ project by releasing the core of Virtuozzo under the GNU General Public License (GPL), making container virtualization freely available and fostering community contributions. Key features of OpenVZ include tools such as user and group quotas, fair CPU scheduling, I/O prioritization, and container-specific accounting via "user beancounters" to prevent resource overuse; it also supports checkpointing, between nodes, and compatibility with standard distributions through template-based OS installation. These capabilities allow for near-native performance in Linux-only environments, with advantages in server consolidation and cost savings due to the absence of overhead, though limitations include reliance on a shared kernel, which restricts it to Linux guests and may introduce security risks from potential kernel vulnerabilities. OpenVZ has evolved through kernel ports to versions like 2.6.15 (2006), 2.6.18 with (November 2006), and 2.6.25 (2008), alongside support for architectures including , PowerPC, and ; in 2011, it initiated the CRIU (Checkpoint/Restore In Userspace) project for advanced process migration. In December 2014, Parallels (formerly SWsoft) merged OpenVZ with its Parallels Cloud Server into a unified open-source , and by 2015, it published sources for RHEL7-based kernels and userspace utilities, with ongoing maintenance under Virtuozzo. As of 2025, OpenVZ is no longer actively developed but continues to serve as a foundational for in enterprise hosting and environments, influencing modern solutions like and Docker.

History and Development

Origins and Initial Release

OpenVZ originated as an open-source derivative of Virtuozzo, a proprietary operating system-level platform developed by SWsoft. Virtuozzo was first released in January 2002, introducing container-based for servers to consolidate multiple virtual private servers (VPS) on a single physical host, thereby reducing hardware costs for hosting providers. In 2005, SWsoft—later rebranded as Parallels and now part of the Virtuozzo ecosystem—launched OpenVZ to open-source the core components of Virtuozzo, fostering community contributions and broader adoption. The initial release made available the kernel modifications and user-space tools that enabled efficient without the resource overhead of full in traditional virtual machines. This move addressed the limitations of by allowing free modification and distribution, aligning with the growing demand for cost-effective Linux-based hosting solutions. The OpenVZ kernel patches were licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2), ensuring compatibility with the kernel's licensing requirements. In contrast, the user-space tools, such as utilities for creation and management, were released under a variety of open-source licenses, primarily GPLv2 or later, but also including the BSD license and version 2.1 or later for specific components. The primary goal of OpenVZ was to deliver lightweight, secure for environments, enabling hosting providers to offer affordable VPS services with near-native performance by sharing the host kernel among isolated instances.

Key Milestones and Evolution

OpenVZ's development progressed rapidly following its initial release, with significant enhancements to core functionality. In April 2006, the project introduced checkpointing and capabilities, enabling the seamless transfer of virtual environments (VEs) between physical servers without downtime. This feature marked a pivotal advancement in container reliability and mobility for production environments. By 2012, with the release of vzctl 4.0, OpenVZ gained support for unpatched upstream 3.x kernels, allowing users to operate containers on standard kernels with a reduced but functional feature set, thereby minimizing the need for custom patches. This update, which became widely available in early 2013, broadened compatibility and eased integration with mainstream distributions. The project's governance shifted in the late 2000s and following corporate changes. After Parallels acquired SWsoft in 2008, OpenVZ came under Parallels' umbrella, but development transitioned to Virtuozzo oversight starting in 2015 when Virtuozzo was spun out as an independent entity focused on and technologies. In December 2014, Parallels announced the merger of OpenVZ with Parallels Cloud Server into a unified codebase, which Virtuozzo formalized in 2016 with the release of OpenVZ 7.0, integrating support alongside containers. Major OpenVZ-specific releases tapered off after 2017, with the final significant updates to the 7.x series occurring around that time, reflecting a strategic pivot toward commercial products. By 2025, OpenVZ had evolved into the broader Virtuozzo Hybrid Infrastructure, a hybrid cloud platform combining containers, VMs, and storage orchestration for service providers. As of 2025, OpenVZ 9 remains in testing with pre-release versions available, though no stable release has been issued, prompting discussions on migration paths. Community discussions in 2023 highlighted ongoing interest in , particularly around an OpenVZ 9 roadmap, with users inquiring about potential updates to support newer kernels and features amid concerns over the project's maintenance status. In 2024, reports emerged of practical challenges, such as errors during VPS creation in OpenVZ 7 environments, including failures with package management tools like vzpkg when handling certain OS templates. These issues underscored the maturing ecosystem's reliance on patches for sustained .

Current Status and Community Involvement

As of 2025, OpenVZ receives limited primarily through its commercial successor, Virtuozzo Hybrid Server 7, which entered end-of- in July 2024 but continues to provide updates until its end-of-life in December 2026. For instance, in July 2025, Virtuozzo issued patches addressing vulnerabilities in components such as (CVE-2025-32462), (CVE-2024-12085), and microcode_ctl (CVE-2024-45332), ensuring ongoing stability for kernel and related tools in hybrid infrastructure environments. Similarly, kernel updates incorporate fixes for stability and vulnerabilities across supported kernels. However, core OpenVZ versions, such as 4.6 and 4.7, reached end-of-life in 2018, with no further updates beyond that point. Community involvement persists through established channels like the OpenVZ forum, which has supported users since 2010, though activity focuses more on legacy setups than innovation. Discussions indicate a dedicated but shrinking user base, with queries in 2025 often centered on migrations to modern alternatives like or KVM, as seen in September 2025 threads on platforms such as Proxmox forums. A 2023 archive from the OpenVZ users hinted at internal plans for future releases, but no roadmap materialized, and promised advancements remain unfulfilled by late 2025. Open-source contributions continue via mirrors, including active maintenance of related projects like CRIU (Checkpoint/Restore In Userspace), with commits as recent as October 29, 2025. In broader 2025 analyses, OpenVZ is widely perceived as a legacy technology, overshadowed by container orchestration tools like Docker and , prompting many providers to phase it out—such as plans announced in to decommission OpenVZ nodes by early 2025. Virtuozzo's updates to Hybrid Infrastructure 7 in 2025 serve as a partial successor, integrating container-based with enhanced storage and compute features for hybrid environments, though it diverges from pure OpenVZ roots. This shift underscores limited new feature development for traditional OpenVZ, with community efforts increasingly archival rather than expansive.

Technical Architecture

Kernel Modifications

OpenVZ relies on a modified that incorporates specific patches to enable , allowing multiple isolated virtual environments (VEs) to share the same kernel without significant overhead. These modifications introduce a virtualization layer that isolates key kernel subsystems, including processes, filesystems, networks, and (IPC), predating the native introduced in later kernel versions. This layer ensures that VEs operate as independent entities while utilizing the host's kernel resources efficiently. A central component of these kernel modifications is the User Beancounters (UBC) subsystem, which provides fine-grained, kernel-level and control over resource usage per VE. UBC tracks and limits resources such as physical memory (including kernel-allocated pages), locked memory, pseudophysical memory (private memory pages), number of processes, and I/O operations, preventing any single VE from monopolizing host resources. For instance, parameters like kmemsize and privvmpages enforce barriers and limits to guarantee fair allocation and detect potential denial-of-service scenarios from resource exhaustion. These counters are accessible via the /proc/user_beancounters interface, where held values reflect current usage and maxheld indicates peaks over accounting periods. Additional modifications include two-level disk quotas and a fair CPU scheduler to enhance resource management. The two-level disk quota system operates hierarchically: at the host level, administrators set per-VE limits on disk space (in blocks) and inodes using tools like vzquota, while inside each VE, standard user-level quotas can be applied independently, enabling container administrators to manage their own users without affecting the host. The fair CPU scheduler implements a two-level fair-share mechanism, where the top level allocates CPU time slices to VEs based on configurable cpuunits (shares), and the bottom level uses the standard Linux Completely Fair Scheduler (CFS) within each VE for process prioritization, ensuring proportional resource distribution across VEs. Over time, OpenVZ kernel development has evolved toward compatibility with upstream Linux kernels from the 3.x series (specifically 3.10 based on RHEL 7), by minimizing custom patches while retaining core features like UBC on dedicated stable branches (e.g., based on RHEL kernels). The current OpenVZ 7, based on RHEL 7 kernel 3.10, has end of maintenance in July 2024 and end of life in December 2026. Full OpenVZ functionality, including UBC and the fair scheduler, requires these patched kernels, as many original patches influenced but were not fully merged into upstream cgroups and namespaces; as of 2025, releases focus on stability and security fixes.

Container Management and Tools

OpenVZ provides a suite of user-space tools for managing , known as virtual private servers (VPS) or (CTs), enabling administrators to create, configure, and administer them efficiently from the host system. The primary command-line utility is vzctl, which runs on the host node and allows direct operations such as creating, starting, stopping, mounting, and destroying , as well as configuring basic parameters like and IP addresses. For example, the command vzctl create 101 --ostemplate centos-7-x86_64 initializes a new using a specified OS template. These tools interface with the underlying kernel modifications to enforce isolation without requiring . Complementing vzctl is vzpkg, a specialized tool for handling package management within , including installing, updating, and removing software packages or entire application templates while maintaining compatibility with the host's package repositories. It supports operations like vzpkg install 101 -p httpd to deploy applications inside a running container numbered 101, leveraging EZ templates that bundle repackaged RPM or DEB packages for seamless integration. vzpkg also facilitates cache management for OS templates, ensuring efficient reuse during deployments. As reported in 2024, some deployments of OpenVZ 7 encountered issues with vzpkg clean failing to locate certain templates due to repository inconsistencies, resolvable by manual cache updates or re-downloads. Container creation in OpenVZ relies heavily on template-based provisioning, where pre-built OS images—such as variants of , , , and —are used to rapidly deploy fully functional environments with minimal configuration. Administrators these OS templates from official repositories via commands like vzpkg [download](/page/Download) centos-7-x86_64, which populate the container's filesystem with essential system programs, libraries, and boot scripts, allowing quick instantiation of isolated instances. This approach supports diverse distributions, enabling tailored deployments for specific workloads without rebuilding from scratch each time. OpenVZ integrates with third-party control panels for graphical management, notably Proxmox VE, which provided native support for OpenVZ containers through its web interface up to version 3.4 released in 2015, after which it transitioned to LXC for containerization.

Isolation Mechanisms

OpenVZ employs chroot-based mechanisms to isolate the file systems of containers, restricting each container's processes to a dedicated subdirectory within the host's file system, thereby preventing access to files outside this boundary. This approach, an enhanced form of the standard Linux chroot syscall, ensures that containers operate as if they have their own root directory while sharing the host's kernel and libraries for efficiency. Bind mounts are utilized to selectively expose host resources, such as the kernel binaries and essential system files, without compromising the overall isolation. For process and user isolation, OpenVZ leverages namespaces to create independent views of system resources for each . Process namespaces assign unique process IDs (PIDs) within a container, making its processes invisible and inaccessible from other containers or the host, with the container's process appearing as PID 1 internally. User namespaces map container user and group IDs to distinct host IDs, allowing root privileges inside the container without granting them on the host. Prior to native support in version 3.8 (introduced in 2013), these namespaces were emulated through custom patches in the OpenVZ kernel to provide similar isolation semantics; subsequent versions integrate mainline kernel features for broader compatibility and reduced . Network isolation in OpenVZ is achieved using virtual Ethernet (veth) devices, which form paired interfaces linking the container's network stack to a bridge on the host, enabling Layer 2 connectivity while maintaining separation. Each container operates in its own private IP address space, complete with independent routing tables, firewall rules (via netfilter/), and network caches, preventing interference between containers or with the host. This setup supports features like broadcasts and multicasts within the container's scope without affecting others. Device access is strictly controlled by default to enforce isolation, with containers denied direct interaction with sensitive host hardware such as GPUs, physical network cards, or storage devices to avoid privilege escalations or . The vzdev kernel module facilitates virtual device management, and administrators can enable passthrough for specific devices using tools like vzctl with options such as --devices, allowing controlled access to hardware like USB or serial ports when required for workloads. Resource limits further reinforce these controls by capping device-related usage, though detailed accounting is handled separately.

Core Features

Resource Management Techniques

OpenVZ employs User Beancounters (UBC) as its primary mechanism for managing resources such as and across , providing both limits and guarantees to ensure fair allocation and prevent resource exhaustion. UBC tracks resource usage through kernel modifications that account for consumption at the container level, allowing administrators to set barriers (soft limits where usage beyond triggers warnings but not enforcement) and limits (hard caps where exceeding results in denial of service or process termination). This system is configurable via parameters in the and monitored through the /proc/user_beancounters interface, which reports held usage against configured thresholds. For , UBC includes parameters like vmguarpages, which guarantees memory availability up to the barrier value in 4 KB pages, ensuring applications can allocate without restriction below this threshold while the limit is typically set to the maximum possible value (LONG_MAX) to avoid hard caps. Another key parameter, oomguarpages, provides out-of-memory (OOM) protection by prioritizing the for reclamation up to the barrier, again with the limit set to LONG_MAX; this helps maintain service levels during host pressure. usage is precisely tracked for parameters such as privvmpages, where the held value represents the sum of resident set size () plus swap usage, calculated as: held=∑(RSS+swap)\text{held} = \sum (\text{RSS} + \text{swap}) in 4 KB pages, enforcing barriers and limits to control private virtual memory allocations. The numproc parameter limits the total number of processes and threads per container, with barrier and limit values set identically to cap parallelism, such as restricting to around 8,000 to balance responsiveness and memory overhead. CPU resources are allocated using a two-level fair-share scheduler that distributes time slices proportionally among containers. At the first level, the scheduler assigns CPU quanta to containers based on the cpuunits parameter, where higher values grant greater shares—for instance, a container with 1000 cpuunits receives twice the allocation of one with 500 when competing for resources. The second level employs the standard scheduler to prioritize processes within a container. This approach ensures equitable distribution of the host's available CPU capacity among containers. Disk and I/O management features two-level quotas to control storage usage and bandwidth. Container-level quotas, set by the host administrator, limit total disk space and inodes per , while intra-container quotas allow the administrator to enforce per-user and per-group limits using standard tools like those from the quota package. For I/O, a two-level scheduler based on CFQ prioritizes operations proportionally across containers, effectively throttling bandwidth to prevent any single from monopolizing the disk subsystem and ensuring predictable .

Checkpointing and Live Migration

OpenVZ introduced checkpointing capabilities in April 2006 as a kernel-based extension known as Checkpoint/Restore (CPT), enabling the capture of a virtual environment's (VE) full state, including memory and process information, for later restoration on the same or different hosts. This feature was designed to support live migration by minimizing service interruptions during VE relocation. The checkpointing process involves three main stages: first, suspending the VE by freezing all processes and confining them to a single CPU to prevent state changes; second, dumping the kernel-level state, such as pages, file descriptors, and network connections, into image files; and third, resuming the VE after cleanup. For , the source host performs the checkpoint, transfers the image files and VE private area (using tools like over the network), and the target host restores the state using compatible kernel modifications, achieving typically under one second for small VEs due to the rapid freeze-dump-resume cycle. This transfer does not require shared storage, as handles , though shared storage can simplify the process for larger datasets. Subsequent development shifted toward userspace implementation with CRIU (Checkpoint/Restore In Userspace), initiated by the OpenVZ team to enhance portability and reduce kernel dependencies, with full integration in OpenVZ 7 starting around 2016. CRIU dumps process states without deep kernel alterations, preserving memory, open files, and IPC objects, and supports iterative pre-copy techniques to migrate memory pages before final freeze, further reducing downtime. Migration requires identical or compatible OpenVZ kernel versions between source and target hosts to ensure state compatibility, along with network connectivity for image transfer. In practice, however, OpenVZ's reliance on modified older kernels (e.g., 3.10 in OpenVZ 7) limits its adoption in modern environments, where CRIU is more commonly used with upstream kernels for containers like or Docker. Virtuozzo, the commercial successor to OpenVZ, enhanced in its 7.0 Update 5 release in 2017 by improving container state preservation during transfers and adding I/O throttling for migration operations to optimize in hybrid setups. These updates enabled seamless relocation of running with preserved network sessions, though full zero-downtime guarantees depend on size and network bandwidth.

Networking and Storage Support

OpenVZ provides virtual networking capabilities primarily through virtual Ethernet (veth) pairs, which consist of two connected interfaces: one on the hardware node (CT0) and the other inside the container, enabling Ethernet-like communication with support for MAC addresses. These veth devices facilitate bridged networking, where container traffic is routed via a software bridge (e.g., br0) connected to the host's physical interface, allowing containers to appear as independent hosts on the network with their own ARP tables. In this setup, outgoing packets from the container traverse the veth adapter to the bridge and then to the physical adapter, while incoming traffic follows the reverse path, ensuring efficient Layer 2 connectivity without the host acting as a router. Containers in OpenVZ maintain private routing tables, configurable independently to support isolated network paths, such as private IP ranges with NAT for internal communication. VPN support is limited and requires specific configurations; for instance, TUN/TAP devices can be enabled by loading the kernel module on the host and granting the container net_admin capabilities, allowing protocols like to function, though non-persistent tunnels may need patched tools. Native support for TUN/TAP is not automatic and demands tweaks, while PPP-based VPNs such as PPTP and L2TP often encounter compatibility issues due to kernel restrictions and device access limitations in the environment. For storage, OpenVZ utilizes image-based disks in the ploop format, a block device that stores the entire filesystem within a single file, offering advantages over traditional shared filesystems by enabling per-container quotas and faster sequential I/O. Ploop supports snapshot creation for point-in-time and state preservation, dynamic resizing of disk images without , and efficient operations through features like . This format integrates with shared storage solutions, such as NFS or , where disks can be hosted to facilitate by minimizing data transfer to only modified blocks tracked during the process. However, using ploop over NFS carries risks of from network interruptions, making it suitable primarily for stable shared environments. Graphical user interface support for managing OpenVZ networking and storage remains basic, with the early EasyVZ tool—released around in version 0.1—providing fundamental capabilities for creation, monitoring, and simple configuration but lacking advanced features for detailed network bridging or ploop snapshot handling. No modern, comprehensive GUI has emerged as a standard for these aspects, relying instead on command-line tools like vzctl and prlctl for precise control.

Comparisons to Other Technologies

OS-Level vs. Hardware and Para-Virtualization

OpenVZ employs operating system-level , where multiple isolated containers, known as virtual private servers (VPSs), share a single host kernel on a Linux-based physical server. This architecture contrasts sharply with hardware solutions like KVM, which utilize a to emulate hardware and run independent guest kernels for each , and para-virtualization approaches like , where guest operating systems run modified kernels aware of the hypervisor or use hardware-assisted modes for full virtualization. In OpenVZ, the absence of a hypervisor layer and hardware emulation means all containers operate directly on the host's kernel, enforcing Linux-only support since non-Linux guests cannot utilize the shared kernel. The shared kernel model in OpenVZ introduces specific compatibility requirements: all containers must use the same kernel version as the host, limiting guests to distributions compatible with that version and preventing the deployment of newer kernel variants or custom modifications without affecting the entire . In comparison, KVM allows unmodified guest kernels, supporting a wide range of operating systems including Windows and various versions independently of the host kernel, while enables para-virtualized guests with modified kernels for efficiency or full virtualization for unmodified ones, accommodating diverse OSes like , Windows, and BSD without host kernel alignment. This kernel independence in hardware and para-virtualization provides greater flexibility for heterogeneous environments but at the cost of added complexity in managing multiple kernel instances. Performance-wise, OpenVZ achieves near-native efficiency with only 1-2% CPU overhead, as containers access hardware and resources directly without the intervention of a or emulation layer, making it particularly suitable for workloads requiring maximal resource utilization. with KVM, leveraging CPU extensions like VT-x or AMD-V, incurs a typically low but measurable overhead—often around 5-10% for CPU-intensive tasks under light host loads—due to the 's scheduling and context-switching demands, though this can vary to 0-30% depending on workload and configuration. Para-virtualization in reduces overhead further by allowing guests to make hypercalls directly, approaching native performance in aware guests, but still introduces some latency from mediation compared to OpenVZ's seamless kernel sharing.

Efficiency and Use Case Differences

OpenVZ excels in resource efficiency through its approach, enabling high container density with hundreds of isolated environments per physical host on standard hardware. This capability arises from minimal overhead, as share the host kernel without emulating hardware or running separate OS instances, resulting in near-native and reduced memory and CPU consumption compared to full virtualization solutions. Such efficiency makes OpenVZ particularly suitable for homogeneous workloads, where multiple similar server instances—such as web servers or databases—can operate with low resource duplication. In practical use cases, OpenVZ powered the emergence of affordable VPS hosting in the mid-2000s, allowing providers to offer entry-level plans starting at around $5 per month by supporting dense deployments for web hosting and lightweight applications. This contrasted with Docker's emphasis on application-centric , which prioritizes portability and for in development and cloud-native environments rather than full OS-level virtual servers. Similarly, OpenVZ differed from VMware's hardware-assisted , which caters to enterprise needs with support for diverse operating systems but incurs higher overhead unsuitable for budget-oriented, Linux-exclusive VPS scenarios. By 2025, OpenVZ's influence in democratizing access to virtual servers has waned as users migrate to successors like and container orchestration tools, which offer improved isolation and broader ecosystem integration while building on its efficiency foundations.

Limitations and Challenges

Technical Restrictions

OpenVZ containers share the single host kernel, necessitating that all guest operating systems use user-space components compatible with the host kernel version, which for OpenVZ 7 is based on 3.10 from RHEL 7. This shared kernel architecture prevents running distributions requiring kernel features introduced after 3.10, such as newer calls or modules, thereby limiting OS diversity to older or patched variants of . By design, OpenVZ restricts container access to physical hardware devices to maintain portability and isolation, preventing direct passthrough of components like GPUs and USB devices without host modifications. GPU acceleration is unavailable in containers, resulting in software rendering for graphical applications rather than hardware utilization, a limitation stemming from the absence of device isolation mechanisms in the shared kernel environment. Similarly, USB device access is confined, with no standard support for passthrough to containers; while assignable in Virtuozzo's virtual machines, containers lack native integration, often requiring privileged mode or custom kernel tweaks that compromise . This hardware restriction also halts native GUI advancements, as the 3.10 kernel does not support features or drivers requiring kernel versions newer than 3.10 without external updates, confining visual applications to basic console or legacy X11 modes. Advanced networking features, including VPN support via TUN/TAP interfaces, are not enabled by default and demand explicit host configuration, such as adjusting container parameters with tools like prlctl or vzctl to grant device permissions. Without these modifications, containers cannot create or manage TUN/TAP devices, leading to failures in establishing tunnels for protocols like or , as the shared kernel enforces restrictions to prevent resource contention. In OpenVZ 7, compatibility with newer distributions like 18.04 and later presents challenges due to the fixed 3.10 kernel, which lacks support for modern user-space requirements such as updated versions or behaviors. Templates for 18.04 exist but have encountered creation errors, such as missing package dependencies during vzpkg operations, often resolved only through manual template rebuilding. Upgrading containers from 16.04 to 18.04 or higher is infeasible without host kernel changes, as newer distros assume kernel capabilities unavailable in 3.10. As of 2024, the 24.04 template was introduced for OpenVZ 7.0.22, but early deployments faced daemon-reexec issues causing unit tracking failures, necessitating libvzctl updates and container restarts for stability.

Security and Compatibility Issues

OpenVZ's , which shares a single kernel instance among the host and all , exposes it to inherent risks, including the potential for container escapes where a exploited within one could compromise the host system or other . This shared-kernel model amplifies the impact of kernel-level flaws, as any successful exploit grants attacker access to the entire environment rather than being confined to the affected . Historical vulnerabilities prior to 2017 highlighted these risks, particularly kernel escape opportunities. For instance, CVE-2013-2239 in the OpenVZ-modified 2.6.32 involved uninitialized length variables in the CIFS filesystem , enabling local users to obtain from kernel memory and potentially facilitating or escapes. Similarly, CVE-2014-3519 allowed escapes via the simfs filesystem by exploiting the open_by_handle_at function, permitting unauthorized access to host filesystems; this was reported through security mailing lists and mitigated in kernel updates like 042stab090.5. Patches for such issues, including those addressing the (CVE-2016-5195) in OpenVZ kernels based on RHEL5 derivatives, were released to prevent exploitation, but the shared kernel continued to necessitate vigilant host-level security measures. As of 2025, Virtuozzo, the primary maintainer of OpenVZ-derived technologies, addressed recent vulnerabilities in hybrid server environments supporting OpenVZ containers. Specifically, update VZA-2025-011 fixed CVE-2025-32462 in , a flaw allowing unauthorized elevation via the -h/--host option in configurations with shared sudoers files; CVE-2024-12085 in , which leaked uninitialized stack data through checksum manipulation; and CVE-2024-45332 in microcode_ctl, exposing sensitive microarchitectural state on processors. These patches, applied via yum update in Virtuozzo Hybrid Server 7.5, underscore ongoing efforts to secure containerized deployments against both kernel and user-space threats. Compatibility challenges in OpenVZ stem from its dependence on custom-patched kernels that lag behind mainline Linux development, limiting support for modern features. Notably, OpenVZ does not fully support cgroups v2, the unified hierarchy introduced in Linux kernel 4.5 and stabilized in later versions, as its implementations (such as in Virtuozzo 7 based on kernel 3.10) rely on cgroups v1 for resource management, potentially complicating integration with tools like systemd or newer container orchestrators that prefer v2. To mitigate data security gaps, Virtuozzo added default data-at-rest encryption for OpenVZ system containers in 2017, using per-container keys to protect stored data without impacting performance, though this requires compatible storage backends and does not retroactively secure legacy setups. These limitations have prompted recommendations for enhanced host isolation and adherence to container security best practices, such as regular kernel patching and privilege separation, to compensate for architectural constraints. As of 2025, these architectural constraints have contributed to declining adoption, with several hosting providers, such as Hostinger, announcing the phase-out of OpenVZ VPS services by January 2026 in favor of more modern virtualization technologies like KVM, citing improved security and flexibility.

Adoption and Legacy

Commercial and Community Deployments

OpenVZ saw significant commercial adoption in the virtual private server (VPS) market during the 2000s and early 2010s, powering low-cost hosting plans that often started below $5 per month and enabled efficient resource sharing for small-scale web hosting and development environments. Providers like ChicagoVPS and others leveraged its OS-level virtualization to offer affordable, isolated environments with quick provisioning, contributing to its popularity among budget-conscious users and small businesses. In enterprise settings, Virtuozzo—the commercial product built on OpenVZ—supports hybrid deployments for service providers and organizations requiring scalable, multi-tenant platforms. Virtuozzo Hybrid Server extends OpenVZ's technology with enhanced tools, storage, and networking features, facilitating production-ready OpenStack-based infrastructures used by companies such as Sharktech and Worldstream for public and private services. These deployments emphasize high performance and low , with examples including as a Service and storage solutions integrated into enterprise workflows. Within the community, OpenVZ has sustained long-term usage since at least 2010, as evidenced by forum discussions where users report ongoing reliance on it for stable, reliable in personal and small-scale projects. Integrations with control panels like Virtualizor have further supported community deployments by simplifying container management, OS template handling, and migration tasks on OpenVZ 7 setups. As of 2025, OpenVZ deployments show a decline in new adoptions— with its market mindshare in server virtualization at 0.4%—but legacy systems, particularly OpenVZ 7, persist for core services in hosting and internal infrastructures where compatibility and remain priorities. Current providers such as Hostnamaste and Lonex continue to offer OpenVZ VPS plans starting at around $3.50 per month, catering to users maintaining established workloads.

Market Impact and Successors

OpenVZ significantly shaped the virtualization landscape in the mid-2000s by pioneering affordable (VPS) offerings, enabling hosting providers to partition physical servers into multiple isolated environments with minimal overhead and thus creating a market for sub-$5 monthly plans that democratized access to dedicated server resources. This efficiency allowed service providers to scale operations cost-effectively, fostering widespread adoption among small businesses and developers who previously faced high in . The technology's OS-level approach influenced the evolution of by demonstrating the viability of lightweight, kernel-sharing , which laid groundwork for subsequent innovations in isolated application deployment and . OpenVZ's emphasis on secure, efficient partitioning inspired broader industry shifts toward container-based architectures, contributing to the conceptual foundations that enabled the container revolution in the 2010s. OpenVZ's direct successor emerged through Virtuozzo's commercial extensions, evolving into the Virtuozzo Hybrid Server and ultimately the Virtuozzo Hybrid Infrastructure 7.0 released in 2025, which integrates system containers with KVM virtual machines, software-defined storage, and support for running Docker and within environments for hybrid cloud deployments. This lineage preserves OpenVZ's open-source container heritage while addressing modern demands for orchestration and scalability. By 2025, industry analyses view OpenVZ as largely obsolete for new projects due to its outdated kernel support and limited compatibility with contemporary cloud-native workflows, prompting migrations to successors like , Docker (introduced in 2013), and for enhanced portability and ecosystem integration.

References

  1. https://openvz.org/
  2. https://wiki.openvz.org/History
  3. https://wiki.openvz.org/Leaflet
  4. https://www.servermania.com/kb/articles/kvm-vs-openvz
  5. https://wiki.openvz.org/Releases
  6. https://www.virtuozzo.com/company/history/
  7. https://download.openvz.org/doc/OpenVZ-Users-Guide.pdf
  8. https://wiki.openvz.org/Features
  9. https://wiki.openvz.org/Vzctl_for_upstream_kernel
  10. https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/releases/
  11. https://forum.openvz.org/index.php?t=tree&th=13686
  12. https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/197470/as-openvz-appears-to-be-dead-does-the-provider-have-plans-to-upgrade-to-lxc-or-kvm
  13. https://forum.openvz.org/index.php?t=msg&th=13686
  14. https://www.virtualizor.com/docs/faq/openvz-7-vps-creation-issue
  15. https://www.virtuozzo.com/hybrid-server-docs/7.5/product-lifecycle-policy/
  16. https://www.virtuozzo.com/hybrid-server-docs/7.5/vhs75-rn-vza-2025-011/
  17. https://forum.openvz.org/
  18. https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/migrate-a-ct-from-openvz-virtuozzo-7-to-a-proxmox-pve-lxc.172937/
  19. https://www.mail-archive.com/users%40openvz.org/msg07892.html
  20. https://criu.org/index.php?title=Recent_commits&mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop
  21. https://www.virtuozzo.com/company/blog/product-updates/external-storage-secure-policy-s3-hybrid-infrastructure-7-0/
  22. https://download.openvz.org/doc/openvz-intro.pdf
  23. https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2007/ols2007v1-pages-285-292.pdf
  24. https://wiki.openvz.org/Proc/user_beancounters
  25. https://ispsystem.com/docs/vmmanager-ovz/third-party-systems/openvz-virtualization-management
  26. https://wiki.openvz.org/CPU_Fair_scheduler
  27. https://wiki.openvz.org/Kernel_patches
  28. https://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel
  29. https://wiki.openvz.org/Vzctl
  30. https://wiki.openvz.org/Man/vzctl.8
  31. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_command_line_reference.webhelp/_vzpkg.html
  32. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_command_line_reference.webhelp/_vzpkg_install.html
  33. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.webhelp/_templates.html
  34. https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/OpenVZ
  35. https://wiki.openvz.org/WP/What_are_containers
  36. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.webhelp/_openvz_containers.html
  37. https://wiki.openvz.org/History_of_containers_in_Linux_kernel
  38. https://lwn.net/Articles/528078/
  39. https://wiki.openvz.org/Virtual_Ethernet_device
  40. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.webhelp/_configuring_virtual_devices.html
  41. https://wiki.openvz.org/UBC
  42. https://wiki.openvz.org/UBC_parameters
  43. https://wiki.openvz.org/UBC_primary_parameters
  44. https://support.virtuozzo.com/hc/en-us/articles/6403355537937-What-are-User-Beancounters
  45. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.pdf
  46. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.webhelp/_managing_disk_quotas.html
  47. https://wiki.openvz.org/Disk_quota
  48. https://wiki.openvz.org/Checkpointing_and_live_migration
  49. https://landley.net/kdocs/ols/2008/ols2008v2-pages-85-90.pdf
  50. https://wiki.openvz.org/Checkpointing_internals
  51. https://criu.org/Integration
  52. https://github.com/checkpoint-restore/criu
  53. https://criu.org/Main_Page
  54. https://www.virtuozzo.com/hybrid-server-docs/7.5/vhs75-rn-vza-2017-066/
  55. https://vmblog.com/archive/2017/12/05/latest-virtuozzo-release-simplifies-high-availability-for-containers-and-vms-expands-storage-capabilities.aspx
  56. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.webhelp/_bridged_mode_for_containers.html
  57. https://wiki.openvz.org/Using_NAT_for_container_with_private_IPs
  58. https://wiki.openvz.org/VPN_via_the_TUN/TAP_device
  59. https://wiki.openvz.org/Ploop
  60. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.webhelp/_live_migration_of_virtual_machines_and_containers.html
  61. https://wiki.openvz.org/Ploop/Why
  62. https://sourceforge.net/projects/easyvz/
  63. https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Main_Page
  64. https://www.booleanworld.com/openvz-vs-kvm-vs-xen-virtualization-technologies-explained/
  65. https://www.embedded.com/performance-overhead-of-kvm-for-linux-3-9-on-arm-cortex-a15/
  66. https://www.servermania.com/kb/articles/xen-vs-kvm
  67. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.webhelp/_basics_of_os_virtualization.html
  68. https://www.enginyring.com/en/blog/openvz-explained-why-its-obsolete-and-what-to-use-instead
  69. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29304951/difference-between-docker-and-openvz
  70. https://swissmade.host/en/blog/comparison-of-hypervisors-in-vps-hosting-vmware-xen-kvm-openvz
  71. https://lists.openvz.org/pipermail/announce/2016-July/000664.html
  72. http://forum.openvz.org/index.php?&t=msg&th=12719
  73. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.webhelp/_assigning_usb_devices_to_virtual_machines.html
  74. https://www.time4vps.com/whats-the-difference-between-openvz-6-vs-openvz-7/
  75. https://www.veeble.com/kb/how-to-easily-enable-tun-tap-on-openvz-for-vpn-or-proxy-support/
  76. https://serverfault.com/questions/324501/what-could-i-or-my-vps-provider-be-doing-wrong-tun-tap-on-openvz
  77. https://askubuntu.com/questions/1110316/upgrade-16-04-openvz-to-18-04-but-keep-kernel-to-2-6
  78. http://forum.openvz.org/index.php?t=msg&goto=53863&
  79. https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/2826/can-a-kernel-exploit-compromise-an-openvz-host
  80. https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-2239
  81. https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/06/24/16
  82. https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/26/7
  83. https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_readme.webhelp/_what_8217_s_new.html
  84. https://www.virtuozzo.com/hybrid-server-docs/7.5/readme-whats-new/
  85. https://cloudnativenow.com/features/virtuozzo-encryption-openvz-containers/
  86. https://bobcares.com/blog/complete-guide-migrating-your-hostinger-openvz-vps-to-kvm-before-2026/
  87. https://lowendbox.com/blog/chicagovps-7-2gb-openvz-vps-in-chicago/
  88. https://crowncloud.net/classic_openvz.php
  89. https://www.virtuozzo.com/hybrid-server-docs/7.5/users-guide-vhs-vs-openvz/
  90. https://www.virtuozzo.com/hybrid-infrastructure/
  91. https://www.virtuozzo.com/company/open-source/
  92. https://forum.openvz.org/index.php?t=tree&th=13686&
  93. https://www.virtualizor.com/docs/install/install-openvz-7
  94. https://www.peerspot.com/products/comparisons/openvz_vs_spot
  95. https://www.hostnamaste.com/openvz-vps.php
  96. https://www.lonex.com/vps-hosting/openvz/
  97. https://borosan.gitbook.io/docker-handbook/containerization-history
  98. https://www.virtuozzo.com/hybrid-server-docs/7.5/upgrade-guide-upgrading-from-openvz-based-on-3.10-to-vhs7/
  99. https://docs.virtuozzo.com/virtuozzo_hybrid_infrastructure_7_0_admins_guide/index.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.