Hubbry Logo
Open and closed mapsOpen and closed mapsMain
Open search
Open and closed maps
Community hub
Open and closed maps
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Open and closed maps
Open and closed maps
from Wikipedia

In mathematics, more specifically in topology, an open map is a function between two topological spaces that maps open sets to open sets.[1][2][3] That is, a function is open if for any open set in the image is open in Likewise, a closed map is a function that maps closed sets to closed sets.[3][4] A map may be open, closed, both, or neither;[5] in particular, an open map need not be closed and vice versa.[6]

Open[7] and closed[8] maps are not necessarily continuous.[4] Further, continuity is independent of openness and closedness in the general case and a continuous function may have one, both, or neither property;[3] this fact remains true even if one restricts oneself to metric spaces.[9] Although their definitions seem more natural, open and closed maps are much less important than continuous maps. Recall that, by definition, a function is continuous if and only if the preimage of every open set of is open in [2] (Equivalently, if and only if the preimage of every closed set of is closed in ).

Early study of open maps was pioneered by Simion Stoilow and Gordon Thomas Whyburn.[10]

Definitions and characterizations

[edit]

If is a subset of a topological space then let and (resp. ) denote the closure (resp. interior) of in that space. Let be a function between topological spaces. If is any set then is called the image of under

Competing definitions

[edit]

There are two different competing, but closely related, definitions of "open map" that are widely used, where both of these definitions can be summarized as: "it is a map that sends open sets to open sets." The following terminology is sometimes used to distinguish between the two definitions.

A map is called a

  • "Strongly open map" if whenever is an open subset of the domain then is an open subset of 's codomain
  • "Relatively open map" if whenever is an open subset of the domain then is an open subset of 's image where as usual, this set is endowed with the subspace topology induced on it by 's codomain [11]

Every strongly open map is a relatively open map. However, these definitions are not equivalent in general.

Warning: Many authors define "open map" to mean "relatively open map" (for example, The Encyclopedia of Mathematics) while others define "open map" to mean "strongly open map". In general, these definitions are not equivalent so it is thus advisable to always check what definition of "open map" an author is using.

A surjective map is relatively open if and only if it is strongly open; so for this important special case the definitions are equivalent. More generally, a map is relatively open if and only if the surjection is a strongly open map.

Because is always an open subset of the image of a strongly open map must be an open subset of its codomain In fact, a relatively open map is a strongly open map if and only if its image is an open subset of its codomain. In summary,

A map is strongly open if and only if it is relatively open and its image is an open subset of its codomain.

By using this characterization, it is often straightforward to apply results involving one of these two definitions of "open map" to a situation involving the other definition.

The discussion above will also apply to closed maps if each instance of the word "open" is replaced with the word "closed".

Open maps

[edit]

A map is called an open map or a strongly open map if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:

  1. Definition: maps open subsets of its domain to open subsets of its codomain; that is, for any open subset of , is an open subset of
  2. is a relatively open map and its image is an open subset of its codomain
  3. For every and every neighborhood of (however small), is a neighborhood of . We can replace the first or both instances of the word "neighborhood" with "open neighborhood" in this condition and the result will still be an equivalent condition:
    • For every and every open neighborhood of , is a neighborhood of .
    • For every and every open neighborhood of , is an open neighborhood of .
  4. for all subsets of where denotes the topological interior of the set.
  5. Whenever is a closed subset of then the set is a closed subset of
    • This is a consequence of the identity which holds for all subsets

If is a basis for then the following can be appended to this list:

  1. maps basic open sets to open sets in its codomain (that is, for any basic open set is an open subset of ).

Closed maps

[edit]

A map is called a relatively closed map if whenever is a closed subset of the domain then is a closed subset of 's image where as usual, this set is endowed with the subspace topology induced on it by 's codomain

A map is called a closed map or a strongly closed map if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:

  1. Definition: maps closed subsets of its domain to closed subsets of its codomain; that is, for any closed subset of is a closed subset of
  2. is a relatively closed map and its image is a closed subset of its codomain
  3. for every subset
  4. for every closed subset
  5. Whenever is an open subset of then the set is an open subset of
  6. If is a net in and is a point such that in then converges in to the set
    • The convergence means that every open subset of that contains will contain for all sufficiently large indices

A surjective map is strongly closed if and only if it is relatively closed. So for this important special case, the two definitions are equivalent. By definition, the map is a relatively closed map if and only if the surjection is a strongly closed map.

If in the open set definition of "continuous map" (which is the statement: "every preimage of an open set is open"), both instances of the word "open" are replaced with "closed" then the statement of results ("every preimage of a closed set is closed") is equivalent to continuity. This does not happen with the definition of "open map" (which is: "every image of an open set is open") since the statement that results ("every image of a closed set is closed") is the definition of "closed map", which is in general not equivalent to openness. There exist open maps that are not closed and there also exist closed maps that are not open. This difference between open/closed maps and continuous maps is ultimately due to the fact that for any set only is guaranteed in general, whereas for preimages, equality always holds.

Examples

[edit]

The function defined by is continuous, closed, and relatively open, but not (strongly) open. This is because if is any open interval in 's domain that does not contain then where this open interval is an open subset of both and However, if is any open interval in that contains then which is not an open subset of 's codomain but is an open subset of Because the set of all open intervals in is a basis for the Euclidean topology on this shows that is relatively open but not (strongly) open.

If has the discrete topology (that is, all subsets are open and closed) then every function is both open and closed (but not necessarily continuous). For example, the floor function from to is open and closed, but not continuous. This example shows that the image of a connected space under an open or closed map need not be connected.

Whenever we have a product of topological spaces the natural projections are open[12][13] (as well as continuous). Since the projections of fiber bundles and covering maps are locally natural projections of products, these are also open maps. Projections need not be closed however. Consider for instance the projection on the first component; then the set is closed in but is not closed in However, for a compact space the projection is closed. This is essentially the tube lemma.

To every point on the unit circle we can associate the angle of the positive -axis with the ray connecting the point with the origin. This function from the unit circle to the half-open interval [0,2π) is bijective, open, and closed, but not continuous. It shows that the image of a compact space under an open or closed map need not be compact. Also note that if we consider this as a function from the unit circle to the real numbers, then it is neither open nor closed. Specifying the codomain is essential.

Sufficient conditions

[edit]

Every homeomorphism is open, closed, and continuous. In fact, a bijective continuous map is a homeomorphism if and only if it is open, or equivalently, if and only if it is closed.

The composition of two (strongly) open maps is an open map and the composition of two (strongly) closed maps is a closed map.[14][15] However, the composition of two relatively open maps need not be relatively open and similarly, the composition of two relatively closed maps need not be relatively closed. If is strongly open (respectively, strongly closed) and is relatively open (respectively, relatively closed) then is relatively open (respectively, relatively closed).

Let be a map. Given any subset if is a relatively open (respectively, relatively closed, strongly open, strongly closed, continuous, surjective) map then the same is true of its restriction to the -saturated subset

The categorical sum of two open maps is open, or of two closed maps is closed.[15] The categorical product of two open maps is open, however, the categorical product of two closed maps need not be closed.[14][15]

A bijective map is open if and only if it is closed. The inverse of a bijective continuous map is a bijective open/closed map (and vice versa). A surjective open map is not necessarily a closed map, and likewise, a surjective closed map is not necessarily an open map. All local homeomorphisms, including all coordinate charts on manifolds and all covering maps, are open maps.

Closed map lemmaEvery continuous function from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is closed and proper (meaning that preimages of compact sets are compact).

A variant of the closed map lemma states that if a continuous function between locally compact Hausdorff spaces is proper then it is also closed.

In complex analysis, the identically named open mapping theorem states that every non-constant holomorphic function defined on a connected open subset of the complex plane is an open map.

The invariance of domain theorem states that a continuous and locally injective function between two -dimensional topological manifolds must be open.

Invariance of domainIf is an open subset of and is an injective continuous map, then is open in and is a homeomorphism between and

In functional analysis, the open mapping theorem states that every surjective continuous linear operator between Banach spaces is an open map. This theorem has been generalized to topological vector spaces beyond just Banach spaces.

A surjective map is called an almost open map if for every there exists some such that is a point of openness for which by definition means that for every open neighborhood of is a neighborhood of in (note that the neighborhood is not required to be an open neighborhood). Every surjective open map is an almost open map but in general, the converse is not necessarily true. If a surjection is an almost open map then it will be an open map if it satisfies the following condition (a condition that does not depend in any way on 's topology ):

whenever belong to the same fiber of (that is, ) then for every neighborhood of there exists some neighborhood of such that

If the map is continuous then the above condition is also necessary for the map to be open. That is, if is a continuous surjection then it is an open map if and only if it is almost open and it satisfies the above condition.

Properties

[edit]

Open or closed maps that are continuous

[edit]

If is a continuous map that is also open or closed then:

  • if is a surjection then it is a quotient map and even a hereditarily quotient map,
    • A surjective map is called hereditarily quotient if for every subset the restriction is a quotient map.
  • if is an injection then it is a topological embedding.
  • if is a bijection then it is a homeomorphism.

In the first two cases, being open or closed is merely a sufficient condition for the conclusion that follows. In the third case, it is necessary as well.

Open continuous maps

[edit]

If is a continuous (strongly) open map, and then:

  • where denotes the boundary of a set.
  • where denote the closure of a set.
  • If where denotes the interior of a set, then where this set is also necessarily a regular closed set (in ).[note 1] In particular, if is a regular closed set then so is And if is a regular open set then so is
  • If the continuous open map is also surjective then and moreover, is a regular open (resp. a regular closed)[note 1] subset of if and only if is a regular open (resp. a regular closed) subset of
  • If a net converges in to a point and if the continuous open map is surjective, then for any there exists a net in (indexed by some directed set ) such that in and is a subnet of Moreover, the indexing set may be taken to be with the product order where is any neighbourhood basis of directed by [note 2]

See also

[edit]
  • Almost open map – Map that satisfies a condition similar to that of being an open map
  • Closed graph – Property of functions in topology
  • Closed linear operator – Linear operator whose graph is closed
  • Local homeomorphism – Mathematical function revertible near each point
  • Quasi-open map – Function that maps non-empty open sets to sets that have non-empty interior in its codomain
  • Quotient map (topology) – Topological space construction
  • Perfect map – Continuous closed surjective map, each of whose fibers are also compact sets
  • Proper map – Map between topological spaces with the property that the preimage of every compact is compact
  • Sequence covering map

Notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Munkres, James R. (2000). Topology (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-181629-2.
  2. ^ a b Mendelson, Bert (1990) [1975]. Introduction to Topology (Third ed.). Dover. p. 89. ISBN 0-486-66352-3. It is important to remember that Theorem 5.3 says that a function is continuous if and only if the inverse image of each open set is open. This characterization of continuity should not be confused with another property that a function may or may not possess, the property that the image of each open set is an open set (such functions are called open mappings).
  3. ^ a b c Lee, John M. (2003). Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 218. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 550. ISBN 9780387954486. A map (continuous or not) is said to be an open map if for every closed subset is open in and a closed map if for every closed subset is closed in Continuous maps may be open, closed, both, or neither, as can be seen by examining simple examples involving subsets of the plane.
  4. ^ a b Ludu, Andrei (15 January 2012). Nonlinear Waves and Solitons on Contours and Closed Surfaces. Springer Series in Synergetics. p. 15. ISBN 9783642228940. An open map is a function between two topological spaces which maps open sets to open sets. Likewise, a closed map is a function which maps closed sets to closed sets. The open or closed maps are not necessarily continuous.
  5. ^ Sohrab, Houshang H. (2003). Basic Real Analysis. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 203. ISBN 9780817642112. Now we are ready for our examples which show that a function may be open without being closed or closed without being open. Also, a function may be simultaneously open and closed or neither open nor closed. (The quoted statement in given in the context of metric spaces but as topological spaces arise as generalizations of metric spaces, the statement holds there as well.)
  6. ^ Naber, Gregory L. (2012). Topological Methods in Euclidean Spaces. Dover Books on Mathematics (reprint ed.). Courier Corporation. p. 18. ISBN 9780486153445. Exercise 1-19. Show that the projection map π1:X1 × ··· × XkXi is an open map, but need not be a closed map. Hint: The projection of R2 onto is not closed. Similarly, a closed map need not be open since any constant map is closed. For maps that are one-to-one and onto, however, the concepts of 'open' and 'closed' are equivalent.
  7. ^ Mendelson, Bert (1990) [1975]. Introduction to Topology (Third ed.). Dover. p. 89. ISBN 0-486-66352-3. There are many situations in which a function has the property that for each open subset of the set is an open subset of and yet is not continuous.
  8. ^ Boos, Johann (2000). Classical and Modern Methods in Summability. Oxford University Press. p. 332. ISBN 0-19-850165-X. Now, the question arises whether the last statement is true in general, that is whether closed maps are continuous. That fails in general as the following example proves.
  9. ^ Kubrusly, Carlos S. (2011). The Elements of Operator Theory. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 115. ISBN 9780817649982. In general, a map of a metric space into a metric space may possess any combination of the attributes 'continuous', 'open', and 'closed' (that is, these are independent concepts).
  10. ^ Hart, K. P.; Nagata, J.; Vaughan, J. E., eds. (2004). Encyclopedia of General Topology. Elsevier. p. 86. ISBN 0-444-50355-2. It seems that the study of open (interior) maps began with papers [13,14] by S. Stoïlow. Clearly, openness of maps was first studied extensively by G.T. Whyburn [19,20].
  11. ^ Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 225–273.
  12. ^ Willard, Stephen (1970). General Topology. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0486131785.
  13. ^ Lee, John M. (2012). Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 218 (Second ed.). p. 606. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9982-5. ISBN 978-1-4419-9982-5. Archived from the original on 2022-10-13. Retrieved 2021-09-12. Exercise A.32. Suppose are topological spaces. Show that each projection is an open map.
  14. ^ a b Baues, Hans-Joachim; Quintero, Antonio (2001). Infinite Homotopy Theory. K-Monographs in Mathematics. Vol. 6. p. 53. ISBN 9780792369820. A composite of open maps is open and a composite of closed maps is closed. Also, a product of open maps is open. In contrast, a product of closed maps is not necessarily closed,...
  15. ^ a b c James, I. M. (1984). General Topology and Homotopy Theory. Springer-Verlag. p. 49. ISBN 9781461382836. ...let us recall that the composition of open maps is open and the composition of closed maps is closed. Also that the sum of open maps is open and the sum of closed maps is closed. However, the product of closed maps is not necessarily closed, although the product of open maps is open.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In , an open map is a function between topological spaces that maps open sets to open sets, while a closed map maps closed sets to closed sets; these properties highlight how certain functions preserve the openness or closedness of subsets without necessarily requiring continuity or bijectivity. Formally, given topological spaces XX and YY, a f:XYf: X \to Y is open if for every open subset UXU \subseteq X, the f(U)f(U) is open in YY, and it is closed if for every closed subset CXC \subseteq X, the f(C)f(C) is closed in YY. These definitions do not imply continuity, as there are no general relationships between openness, closedness, and continuity for arbitrary . A key application arises in the characterization of homeomorphisms: a continuous bijection f:XYf: X \to Y is a homeomorphism if and only if it is open (or equivalently, closed), ensuring it preserves all topological properties. Classic examples include the inclusion map (0,1)R(0,1) \hookrightarrow \mathbb{R}, which is open but not closed, since open sets in the subspace map to open sets in R\mathbb{R}, but for example, the set {1/nn=2,3,}\{1/n \mid n = 2,3,\dots \} is closed in (0,1)(0,1) but its image is not closed in R\mathbb{R}; conversely, the inclusion [0,1]R[0,1] \hookrightarrow \mathbb{R} is closed but not open. Projection maps, such as π1:R×RR\pi_1: \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} given by (x,y)x(x,y) \mapsto x, are open but not closed, as they map open sets like open balls to open intervals while sending some closed sets, like lines parallel to the y-axis, to non-closed images. In quotient topology, open or closed surjective continuous maps yield quotient maps, which define the finest topology on the codomain making the map continuous; however, not all quotient maps are open or closed.

Definitions

Open maps

In , an open map is a function between topological spaces that preserves the openness of sets under direct images. Specifically, a map f:XYf: X \to Y between topological spaces XX and YY is defined to be open if, for every open set UXU \subseteq X, the image f(U)f(U) is an open set in YY. Formally, this condition can be stated as: for all UτXU \in \tau_X, where τX\tau_X denotes the topology on XX, it holds that f(U)τYf(U) \in \tau_Y, with τY\tau_Y the topology on YY. This definition appears in standard treatments of and underscores the map's behavior with respect to the open sets of the codomain. The role of an open map lies in its preservation of structural openness from the domain to the , ensuring that the topological features of open subsets in XX translate directly into open subsets in YY. Unlike continuous maps, which focus on preimages of open sets, open maps emphasize the direct images f(U)f(U), thereby highlighting how the τY\tau_Y on YY interacts with the mapping process. This preservation is crucial in contexts where the openness in the codomain must align with the mapped structure from the domain, without requiring surjectivity or other additional properties.

Closed maps

A map f:XYf: X \to Y between topological spaces is called a closed map if the image under ff of every closed subset of XX is closed in YY. Formally, ff is closed if for every CXC \subseteq X, f(C)f(C) belongs to the family of closed sets in YY, denoted τYc\tau_Y^c, which consists of the complements of open sets in the τY\tau_Y on YY. This property ensures that closed maps preserve the "closedness" of subsets under the function's action, distinguishing them from the dual concept of open maps, which instead map open sets to open sets. In particular, the focus on closed sets—defined as complements of open sets—avoids direct overlap with conditions, emphasizing instead the behavior of boundaries and limits in the . Closed maps are useful for controlling the closure of images of subsets.

Characterizations and variants

Equivalent conditions

A map f:XYf: X \to Y between topological spaces is open if and only if f(A)[f(A)]f(A^\circ) \subseteq [f(A)]^\circ for every subset AXA \subseteq X, where \circ denotes the interior operator. Dually, a map f:XYf: X \to Y is closed if and only if f(A)f(A)\overline{f(A)} \subseteq f(\overline{A}) for every subset AXA \subseteq X, where the bar denotes the closure operator. This condition ensures that the image under ff respects closures in a manner symmetric to how the interior condition characterizes openness. For surjective maps, additional equivalences arise in terms of preimages and saturation: a surjective ff is open if the saturation of every open set in XX (with respect to the fibers of ff) is open. A bijective map f:XYf: X \to Y is a if and only if it is open; equivalently, if and only if it is closed. This holds because openness of a bijection implies bicontinuity, as the inverse maps open sets to open sets via the direct images under ff.

Strong and relative versions

In , the usual notion of an open map requires that the image of every in the domain is open in the entire . Specifically, for a function f:XYf: X \to Y between topological spaces XX and YY, ff is open if for every UXU \subseteq X, the set f(U)f(U) is open in YY. Analogously, a closed map is one where the image of every closed set in XX is closed in YY. To address non-surjective maps, relative versions of these concepts are defined with respect to the subspace topology on the image f(X)Yf(X) \subseteq Y. A map f:XYf: X \to Y is a relative open map if for every open set UXU \subseteq X, the set f(U)f(U) is open in the subspace f(X)f(X), meaning there exists an open set VYV \subseteq Y such that f(U)=Vf(X)f(U) = V \cap f(X). Similarly, ff is a relative closed map if the image of every closed set in XX is closed in the subspace f(X)f(X), i.e., there exists a closed set WYW \subseteq Y such that f(C)=Wf(X)f(C) = W \cap f(X) for every closed CXC \subseteq X. These relative notions weaken the usual versions by focusing openness or closedness locally within the image rather than the full codomain. When ff is surjective, so that f(X)=Yf(X) = Y, the subspace topology on f(X)f(X) coincides with the topology on YY, and thus the usual and relative versions of openness (or closedness) are equivalent. In non-surjective cases, the relative condition is strictly weaker than the usual one; for instance, any inclusion map i:AYi: A \hookrightarrow Y of a subspace AYA \subseteq Y is relative open (and relative closed) onto its image by the definition of the subspace topology, but it is open only if AA itself is open in YY. These variants emerged in the development of quotient topology, where the standard constructions assume surjective maps to ensure the quotient map is both continuous and open (or closed), but extensions to non-surjective settings, such as in general identification spaces or momentum maps, necessitated the relative notions to preserve topological properties within the image.

Examples

Continuous maps that are open or closed

A fundamental example of a continuous open map arises in product spaces. Consider the projection map πX:X×YX\pi_X: X \times Y \to X defined by πX(x,y)=x\pi_X(x, y) = x, where XX and YY are topological spaces equipped with the product topology on X×YX \times Y. This map is continuous by the definition of the product topology, as the preimage of any open set UXU \subseteq X is U×YU \times Y, which is open in the product space. Moreover, πX\pi_X is open: the image of a basic open set U×VX×YU \times V \subseteq X \times Y (with UU open in XX and VV open in YY) is UU, which is open in XX. This holds more generally for arbitrary open sets in the product, as they are unions of such basic opens, and images preserve unions. To verify explicitly, suppose WX×YW \subseteq X \times Y is open; then W=i(Ui×Vi)W = \bigcup_i (U_i \times V_i) for opens UiXU_i \subseteq X and ViYV_i \subseteq Y, so πX(W)=iUi\pi_X(W) = \bigcup_i U_i, which is open in XX. Thus, projections illustrate how continuity and openness combine in coordinate extractions from products. Another illustrative case is the inclusion map i:AXi: A \to X where AA is a closed subset of a XX. The map i(a)=ai(a) = a is always continuous when AA inherits the from XX. Furthermore, ii is a closed map precisely when AA is closed in XX: for any closed set CAC \subseteq A, CC is closed in XX (as the intersection of a closed set in XX with the closed AA), and i(C)=Ci(C) = C is thus closed in XX. This property highlights how embeddings of closed subsets preserve closedness under continuous inclusion, preserving the topological structure in a restrictive yet faithful manner.

Maps that are open or closed but not continuous

A classic example of a map that is open but not continuous is the identity on a set XX with at least two elements, where the domain is equipped with the indiscrete topology (also known as the trivial topology, in which the only open sets are \emptyset and XX) and the is equipped with the discrete topology (in which every subset is open). The images of the open sets in the domain are \emptyset (which is open in the discrete topology) and XX (which is open in the discrete topology), so the is open. However, it is not continuous, because the preimage of a singleton {x}\{x\} (which is open in the discrete ) is {x}\{x\}, and singletons are not open in the indiscrete domain unless X=1|X| = 1. This example also illustrates that the is closed, since the closed sets in the indiscrete domain are \emptyset and XX, whose images are closed in the discrete . Another example of an open map that is not continuous arises in the cofinite topology on an XX, where the open sets are \emptyset and the complements of finite subsets of XX. Consider the identity map id:(X,τcofinite)(X,τdiscrete)\mathrm{id}: (X, \tau_\mathrm{cofinite}) \to (X, \tau_\mathrm{discrete}), where the codomain has the discrete topology. The image of any nonempty open set in the domain is cofinite in XX, and every subset (including cofinite sets) is open in the discrete codomain, so the map is open. It is not continuous, however, because the preimage of a singleton {x}\{x\} (open in the discrete codomain) is {x}\{x\}, which has uncountable complement and thus is not open in the cofinite topology. For a closed map that is not continuous, consider the identity map id:(R,τcofinite)(R,τstandard)\mathrm{id}: (\mathbb{R}, \tau_\mathrm{cofinite}) \to (\mathbb{R}, \tau_\mathrm{standard}), where the domain has the cofinite topology and the codomain has the standard Euclidean topology. The closed sets in the cofinite topology are the finite subsets and R\mathbb{R} itself; their images under the identity are finite (hence closed in the standard topology) or R\mathbb{R} (closed), so the map is closed. The map is not continuous, as the preimage of the open interval (0,1)(0,1) (open in the standard codomain) is (0,1)(0,1), whose complement in R\mathbb{R} is (,0][1,)(-\infty,0] \cup [1,\infty) (uncountable, hence not finite), so (0,1)(0,1) is not open in the cofinite domain. A further illustration of a closed but discontinuous map is found in the countable Fort space, a on a countable X={p}YX = \{p\} \cup Y where YY is countably infinite and pYp \notin Y: the open sets are all subsets of YY and all cofinite subsets of XX. The projection π:XY\pi: X \to Y (sending pp to some fixed point in YY and fixing points in YY) to YY equipped with the discrete topology is closed, as the images of closed sets (which include the finite subsets of YY and all subsets containing pp) are finite or all of YY, both closed in the discrete topology. It is not continuous, because the preimage of a singleton {y}Y\{y\} \subset Y (open in the discrete codomain) is {y}\{y\} if yπ(p)y \neq \pi(p), which does not contain pp and is not all of XX, hence not open in the Fort space .

Sufficient conditions

Conditions involving continuity

In topology, a fundamental result concerning closed maps involves continuous bijections between specific types of spaces. Specifically, if XX is a and YY is a , then any continuous f:XYf: X \to Y is a closed map. Moreover, such a bijection is in fact a , as its inverse is also continuous. This theorem highlights how continuity, combined with compactness of the domain and Hausdorff separation in the codomain, suffices to ensure the map is closed and thus a topological in the bijective case. Another key condition arises in the context of quotient maps, which are surjective continuous that identify the topology of the via saturation of preimages. A continuous surjective f:XYf: X \to Y that is also open is necessarily a quotient map. This follows because the openness ensures that the preimage condition for open sets in YY aligns precisely with the quotient definition. Such maps are particularly useful in constructing new spaces by gluing or identification while preserving topological structure. For injective continuous maps, openness provides a sufficient condition for the map to be an , meaning it is a onto its image equipped with the . If f:XYf: X \to Y is a continuous injection and open (onto its image), then ff embeds XX as an open subspace of YY. This is essential in and manifold theory, where embeddings distinguish submanifolds from mere immersions. Continuous maps inherently preserve connectedness: if XX is a and f:XYf: X \to Y is continuous, then f(X)f(X) is connected in YY. When the continuous map is additionally open, this preservation extends to ensuring the image is an open connected subset, reinforcing the map's role in maintaining global connectivity properties under openness.

Conditions from topological properties

A fundamental sufficient condition for a continuous map f:XYf: X \to Y to be closed arises from compactness in the domain and the Hausdorff property in the codomain. Specifically, if XX is compact and YY is Hausdorff, then ff maps closed subsets of XX to closed subsets of YY. This follows because the continuous image of a closed subset of XX—which is compact—is closed in the YY. Local provide a condition for openness independent of global . A f:XYf: X \to Y is a if every point in XX has an open neighborhood on which ff restricts to a onto its image, which is open in YY. Consequently, ff is an open , as the image of any in XX is a union of such open images. Covering maps, being surjective local homeomorphisms between topological spaces (typically with path-connected and locally path-connected base), inherit this openness property. Proper maps offer another intrinsic condition for closedness, particularly in settings involving locally compact spaces. A continuous f:XYf: X \to Y is proper if the preimage of every compact of YY is compact in XX. When YY is Hausdorff, such a proper map is closed, since the of a closed of XX has compact preimages under the inverse, ensuring closure in YY. This generalizes the compact-to-Hausdorff case, where compactness makes every continuous proper. In the context of linearly ordered topological spaces (LOTS), known as chains with the , strictly monotone maps—strictly order-preserving functions—satisfy closedness under surjectivity. A surjective strictly monotone map f:XYf: X \to Y between chains maps closed sets to closed sets, as the order preservation ensures that intervals and their complements behave accordingly under the map. In fact, such surjections are homeomorphisms, reinforcing their closed (and open) nature.

Properties and relations

Preservation under composition

In topology, the composition of two open maps is open. If f:XYf: X \to Y and g:YZg: Y \to Z are open maps between topological spaces, then for any open set UXU \subseteq X, f(U)f(U) is open in YY, and thus g(f(U))g(f(U)) is open in ZZ. Similarly, the composition of two closed maps is closed: if CXC \subseteq X is closed, then f(C)f(C) is closed in YY, and g(f(C))g(f(C)) is closed in ZZ. However, the composition of an open map with a closed map (in either order) need not be open or closed. When the maps are surjective, the preservation of openness or closedness under composition holds without additional conditions, as the property relies only on the images of open or closed sets, and surjectivity ensures the images cover the but is not required for the basic result. At a higher level, the classes of open and closed maps are closed under composition, enabling the definition of categories where the objects are topological spaces and the morphisms are open maps (or closed maps). Such categories have been studied, though they lack certain limits, such as binary products in the case of open maps. This structure relates to monoidal or enriched category theory in , where open maps play a role in models of spatial processes.

Connections to quotient maps and homeomorphisms

A continuous surjective map p:XYp: X \to Y between topological spaces is a quotient map if it endows YY with the quotient topology, meaning a subset UYU \subseteq Y is open precisely when p1(U)p^{-1}(U) is open in XX. Since pp is continuous and surjective, the forward direction holds automatically, but the converse requires additional structure. If pp is also an open map, then for any UYU \subseteq Y with p1(U)p^{-1}(U) open, set V=p1(U)V = p^{-1}(U), which is open, and U=p(V)U = p(V); openness of pp ensures UU is open in YY. Similarly, if pp is closed, the argument uses closed complements: if p1(U)p^{-1}(U) is open, its complement is closed, and surjectivity with closedness of pp implies the complement of UU is closed, so UU is open. Homeomorphisms, which are topological isomorphisms, can be characterized using or closedness for bijective continuous maps. Specifically, a bijective continuous map f:XYf: X \to Y is a it is open, meaning it maps s to s; equivalently, if it is closed. This follows because for a , the inverse f1f^{-1} is continuous ff is open: the preimage under f1f^{-1} of an open set in XX is the image under ff of that set in YY, so of ff ensures continuity of f1f^{-1}. The closed characterization is analogous, using closed sets. In , covering maps provide a key connection, as the universal of a path-connected, locally path-connected space is a covering map, which is a and hence an open map. A p:X~Xp: \tilde{X} \to X means every point in X~\tilde{X} has a neighborhood homeomorphic via pp to a neighborhood in XX, implying since local images of open sets are open. Universal covers, being simply connected covering spaces, thus identify discrete fibers evenly while preserving , facilitating computations of fundamental groups via the Galois correspondence between subgroups and covers. Open quotient maps play a crucial role in algebraic topology for constructing spaces by identifying fibers, such as in group actions where orbits form fibers. When a group GG acts continuously on a space XX satisfying suitable conditions (e.g., freely and properly), the quotient map p:XX/Gp: X \to X/G is a covering map, hence open, ensuring the quotient topology respects local Euclidean structure and allows lifting of paths and homotopies through the fibers. This identification of fibers via openness preserves key invariants like homotopy groups above the base dimension, enabling applications in bundle theory and classification of manifolds.

References

  1. https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definition:Fort_Space/Countable
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.