Hubbry Logo
Interior (topology)Interior (topology)Main
Open search
Interior (topology)
Community hub
Interior (topology)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Interior (topology)
Interior (topology)
from Wikipedia
The point x is an interior point of S. The point y is on the boundary of S.

In mathematics, specifically in topology, the interior of a subset S of a topological space X is the union of all subsets of S that are open in X. A point that is in the interior of S is an interior point of S. The interior of S is the complement of the closure of the complement of S. In this sense interior and closure are dual notions.

The exterior of a set S is the complement of the closure of S; it consists of the points that are in neither the set nor its boundary. The interior, boundary, and exterior of a subset together partition the whole space into three blocks (or fewer when one or more of these is empty).

Definitions

[edit]

Interior point

[edit]

If is a subset of a Euclidean space, then is an interior point of if there exists an open ball centered at which is completely contained in (This is illustrated in the introductory section to this article.)

This definition generalizes to any subset of a metric space with metric : is an interior point of if there exists a real number such that is in whenever the distance

This definition generalizes to topological spaces by replacing "open ball" with "open set". If is a subset of a topological space then is an interior point of in if is contained in an open subset of that is completely contained in (Equivalently, is an interior point of if is a neighbourhood of )

Interior of a set

[edit]

The interior of a subset of a topological space denoted by or or can be defined in any of the following equivalent ways:

  1. is the largest open subset of contained in
  2. is the union of all open sets of contained in
  3. is the set of all interior points of

If the space is understood from context then the shorter notation is usually preferred to

Examples

[edit]
is an interior point of because there is an ε-neighbourhood of which is a subset of
  • In any space, the interior of the empty set is the empty set.
  • In any space if then
  • If is the real line (with the standard topology), then whereas the interior of the set of rational numbers is empty:
  • If is the complex plane then
  • In any Euclidean space, the interior of any finite set is the empty set.

On the set of real numbers, one can put other topologies rather than the standard one:

  • If is the real numbers with the lower limit topology, then
  • If one considers on the topology in which every set is open, then
  • If one considers on the topology in which the only open sets are the empty set and itself, then is the empty set.

These examples show that the interior of a set depends upon the topology of the underlying space. The last two examples are special cases of the following.

  • In any discrete space, since every set is open, every set is equal to its interior.
  • In any indiscrete space since the only open sets are the empty set and itself, and for every proper subset of is the empty set.

Properties

[edit]

Let be a topological space and let and be subsets of

  • is open in
  • If is open in then if and only if
  • is an open subset of when is given the subspace topology.
  • is an open subset of if and only if
  • Intensive:
  • Idempotence:
  • Preserves/distributes over binary intersection:
    • However, the interior operator does not distribute over unions since only is guaranteed in general and equality might not hold.[note 1] For example, if and then is a proper subset of
  • Monotone/nondecreasing with respect to : If then

Other properties include:

  • If is closed in and then

Relationship with closure

The above statements will remain true if all instances of the symbols/words

"interior", "int", "open", "subset", and "largest"

are respectively replaced by

"closure", "cl", "closed", "superset", and "smallest"

and the following symbols are swapped:

  1. "" swapped with ""
  2. "" swapped with ""

For more details on this matter, see interior operator below or the article Kuratowski closure axioms.

Interior operator

[edit]

The interior operator is dual to the closure operator, which is denoted by or by an overline , in the sense that and also where is the topological space containing and the backslash denotes set-theoretic difference. Therefore, the abstract theory of closure operators and the Kuratowski closure axioms can be readily translated into the language of interior operators, by replacing sets with their complements in

In general, the interior operator does not commute with unions. However, in a complete metric space the following result does hold:

Theorem[1] (C. Ursescu)Let be a sequence of subsets of a complete metric space

  • If each is closed in then
  • If each is open in then

The result above implies that every complete metric space is a Baire space.

Exterior of a set

[edit]

The exterior of a subset of a topological space denoted by or simply is the largest open set disjoint from namely, it is the union of all open sets in that are disjoint from The exterior is the interior of the complement, which is the same as the complement of the closure;[2] in formulas,

Similarly, the interior is the exterior of the complement:

The interior, boundary, and exterior of a set together partition the whole space into three blocks (or fewer when one or more of these is empty): where denotes the boundary of [3] The interior and exterior are always open, while the boundary is closed.

Some of the properties of the exterior operator are unlike those of the interior operator:

  • The exterior operator reverses inclusions; if then
  • The exterior operator is not idempotent. It does have the property that

Interior-disjoint shapes

[edit]
The red shapes are not interior-disjoint with the blue Triangle. The green and the yellow shapes are interior-disjoint with the blue Triangle, but only the yellow shape is entirely disjoint from the blue Triangle.

Two shapes and are called interior-disjoint if the intersection of their interiors is empty. Interior-disjoint shapes may or may not intersect in their boundary.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In , the interior of a AA of a XX, denoted Int(A)\operatorname{Int}(A) or AA^\circ, is defined as the union of all s contained in AA, or equivalently, the largest contained within AA. A point xAx \in A is an interior point if there exists an open neighborhood UU of xx such that UAU \subseteq A; the interior consists precisely of all such points. The interior operator Int\operatorname{Int} satisfies several key properties that mirror those of the closure operator but in a dual fashion: it preserves the empty set and whole space, so Int()=\operatorname{Int}(\emptyset) = \emptyset and Int(X)=X\operatorname{Int}(X) = X; monotonic, so if ABA \subseteq B, then Int(A)Int(B)\operatorname{Int}(A) \subseteq \operatorname{Int}(B); and idempotent, meaning Int(Int(A))=Int(A)\operatorname{Int}(\operatorname{Int}(A)) = \operatorname{Int}(A). Additionally, Int(A)\operatorname{Int}(A) is always open and Int(A)A\operatorname{Int}(A) \subseteq A. The interior relates closely to other topological constructs: it is the complement of the closure of the complement, i.e., Int(A)=XCl(XA)\operatorname{Int}(A) = X \setminus \operatorname{Cl}(X \setminus A), and within AA, it is the complement of the boundary of AA, so A=Int(A)AA = \operatorname{Int}(A) \sqcup \partial A. The interior of a closed set is a regular open set, forming the basis for concepts like semi-regular spaces where such sets generate the topology. These properties are related to the Kuratowski closure-complement theorem, which shows that topologies can be characterized such that iterative applications of closure and complement yield at most 14 distinct sets from any subset.

Basic Definitions

Interior point

In a topological space (X,τ)(X, \tau), a point xXx \in X is an interior point of a subset AXA \subseteq X if there exists an open neighborhood UU of xx such that UAU \subseteq A. This condition ensures that xx is surrounded entirely by points of AA within some open set, capturing the intuitive notion that xx lies "deep inside" AA without approaching its edge. Formally, xint(A)x \in \operatorname{int}(A) if and only if there exists an UτU \in \tau with xUAx \in U \subseteq A. The open neighborhood UU serves as a local "buffer" around xx, guaranteeing that no points outside AA intrude into this region. This concept distinguishes interior points from other special points in . A limit point (or accumulation point) of AA requires that every open neighborhood of xx intersects AA (often excluding xx itself to avoid isolated points), but it does not demand full containment within AA. In contrast, boundary points of AA are those where every open neighborhood intersects both AA and its complement XAX \setminus A, placing them on the "edge" rather than safely inside. Interior points, however, avoid such boundary behavior entirely, as their defining neighborhood lies wholly within AA. In familiar Euclidean spaces like Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the standard , the notion gains a clear geometric interpretation: xx is an interior point of AA if there exists a small open ball centered at xx that is entirely contained in AA, evoking the image of xx being buffered by a spherical region of points all belonging to AA. The collection of all such interior points forms the interior of AA.

Interior of a set

In a XX, the interior of a AXA \subseteq X, denoted int(A)\operatorname{int}(A) or AA^\circ, is defined as the union of all open subsets of XX that are contained in AA: int(A)={UXU is open and UA}.\operatorname{int}(A) = \bigcup \{ U \subseteq X \mid U \text{ is open and } U \subseteq A \}. Equivalently, int(A)\operatorname{int}(A) consists of all interior points of AA, that is, the points xAx \in A such that there exists an open neighborhood UU of xx with UAU \subseteq A: int(A)={xAU open in X with xUA}.\operatorname{int}(A) = \{ x \in A \mid \exists U \text{ open in } X \text{ with } x \in U \subseteq A \}. This equivalence follows from the fact that the union of open sets containing such points yields precisely the set of all such points. The set int(A)\operatorname{int}(A) is always open in XX, as it is a union of open sets. Moreover, it is the largest open set contained in AA, meaning that any VAV \subseteq A satisfies Vint(A)V \subseteq \operatorname{int}(A). This maximality property underscores the interior as the "open core" of AA. The interior operation exhibits monotonicity: if ABXA \subseteq B \subseteq X, then int(A)int(B)\operatorname{int}(A) \subseteq \operatorname{int}(B). This holds because every contained in AA is also contained in BB, so the union defining int(A)\operatorname{int}(A) is a of the union defining int(B)\operatorname{int}(B).

Properties

General properties

The interior operation in a topological space contains the union of interiors: for any family of subsets {Ai}iI\{A_i\}_{i \in I}, int(iIAi)iIint(Ai)\operatorname{int}(\bigcup_{i \in I} A_i) \supseteq \bigcup_{i \in I} \operatorname{int}(A_i). This inclusion holds because the union of the interiors is open (arbitrary unions of open sets are open) and contained in iIAi\bigcup_{i \in I} A_i, hence contained in int(iIAi)\operatorname{int}(\bigcup_{i \in I} A_i). In contrast, the interior does not generally preserve arbitrary intersections, but for finite collections {A1,,An}\{A_1, \dots, A_n\}, it satisfies int(k=1nAk)k=1nint(Ak)\operatorname{int}(\bigcap_{k=1}^n A_k) \subseteq \bigcap_{k=1}^n \operatorname{int}(A_k), with equality holding because k=1nint(Ak)\bigcap_{k=1}^n \operatorname{int}(A_k) is open (finite intersection of open sets) and contained in k=1nAk\bigcap_{k=1}^n A_k, hence is the largest open set contained in k=1nAk\bigcap_{k=1}^n A_k. The interior operator is idempotent: for any subset AA, int(int(A))=int(A)\operatorname{int}(\operatorname{int}(A)) = \operatorname{int}(A). Since int(A)\operatorname{int}(A) is already open, it coincides with its own interior, ensuring no further reduction occurs upon reapplication. The interior of the entire space XX is XX itself, as XX is open by definition of a . Similarly, the interior of the \emptyset is \emptyset, since \emptyset is open and contains no points. The interior operation does not preserve complements in general: int(Ac)[int(A)]c\operatorname{int}(A^c) \neq [\operatorname{int}(A)]^c for an arbitrary subset AXA \subseteq X. For instance, in R\mathbb{R} with the standard topology, taking A=QA = \mathbb{Q} yields int(A)=\operatorname{int}(A) = \emptyset and thus [int(A)]c=R[\operatorname{int}(A)]^c = \mathbb{R}, while Ac=RQA^c = \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q} (the irrationals) has int(Ac)=R\operatorname{int}(A^c) = \emptyset \neq \mathbb{R}.

Interior operator

In the framework of the Kuratowski closure-complement theorem, the interior operator is one of four interrelated set operators—interior, closure, exterior, and boundary—generated from a given on a set through repeated applications of closure and complementation. These operators provide an axiomatic foundation for topological structures, where the interior operator captures the notion of the "open core" of a set. An interior operator int\operatorname{int} on the power set of a space XX is defined by the following axioms for all subsets A,BXA, B \subseteq X and arbitrary families {Ai}iI\{A_i\}_{i \in I}:
  • (I1) int()=\operatorname{int}(\emptyset) = \emptyset
  • (I2) int(A)A\operatorname{int}(A) \subseteq A
  • (I3) int(AB)=int(A)int(B)\operatorname{int}(A \cap B) = \operatorname{int}(A) \cap \operatorname{int}(B)
  • (I4) int(int(A))=int(A)\operatorname{int}(\operatorname{int}(A)) = \operatorname{int}(A)
These axioms ensure that int\operatorname{int} preserves binary intersections and is idempotent, distinguishing it as a dual to the closure operator in topological theory. The idempotence axiom (I4) can be understood through the topological interpretation: int(A)\operatorname{int}(A) is the largest contained in AA, and since open sets are fixed under the interior operator (i.e., int(U)=U\operatorname{int}(U) = U for open UU), applying int\operatorname{int} again yields no change. To sketch this, note that (I2) implies int(int(A))int(A)\operatorname{int}(\operatorname{int}(A)) \subseteq \operatorname{int}(A); conversely, since int(A)A\operatorname{int}(A) \subseteq A, we have int(A)int(int(A))\operatorname{int}(A) \subseteq \operatorname{int}(\operatorname{int}(A)) by the maximality of int(A)\operatorname{int}(A) as the largest set satisfying the open properties derived from the s. In any , the interior operator uniquely determines the , as the open sets are precisely the fixed points of int\operatorname{int}—that is, the subsets UXU \subseteq X such that int(U)=U\operatorname{int}(U) = U. This equivalence holds bidirectionally: any such operator satisfying the axioms generates a unique whose open sets are these fixed points. The interior operator was introduced in the context of Kuratowski's 1922 work on closure operators, which laid the groundwork for axiomatic ; modern refinements have extended these axioms to generalized and fuzzy topological settings while preserving the core structure.

Exterior of a set

In a (X,τ)(X, \tau), the exterior of a AXA \subseteq X, denoted ext(A)\operatorname{ext}(A) or AeA^e, is defined as the interior of the complement of AA, that is, ext(A)=int(XA)\operatorname{ext}(A) = \operatorname{int}(X \setminus A). This represents the largest contained entirely within XAX \setminus A, making it the maximal open disjoint from AA. The exterior ext(A)\operatorname{ext}(A) is always an open set, as it is the interior of some subset, and it satisfies Aext(A)=A \cap \operatorname{ext}(A) = \emptyset by construction. Moreover, ext(A)=Xcl(A)\operatorname{ext}(A) = X \setminus \operatorname{cl}(A), where cl(A)\operatorname{cl}(A) is the closure of AA, providing a direct link to the closure without relying on further operations. A key characterizing fact is that every point xext(A)x \in \operatorname{ext}(A) admits an open neighborhood UxU \ni x such that UXAU \subseteq X \setminus A, meaning UU avoids AA entirely. This emphasizes the exterior's role as the "outer" open region strictly separated from AA. While the definition of the exterior holds in any topological space, the absence of separation axioms like Hausdorffness can lead to counterintuitive behaviors, particularly in non-regular spaces where points and closed sets cannot always be separated by disjoint opens. For instance, consider the X={0,1}X = \{0, 1\} with topology {,{0},X}\{\emptyset, \{0\}, X\}, a simple non-Hausdorff (and non-regular) space. For A={1}A = \{1\}, the complement XA={0}X \setminus A = \{0\} is open, so ext(A)=int({0})={0}\operatorname{ext}(A) = \operatorname{int}(\{0\}) = \{0\}, which is disjoint from AA. However, the points 0 and 1 cannot be separated by disjoint open neighborhoods in XX, highlighting how the exterior identifies points with neighborhoods avoiding AA even when the overall space lacks stronger separation properties.

Closure and boundary

The closure of a AXA \subseteq X in a (X,τ)(X, \tau) is defined as the complement of the exterior of AA, where the exterior is the interior of the complement of AA. Thus, cl(A)=Xext(A)=Xint(XA)\operatorname{cl}(A) = X \setminus \operatorname{ext}(A) = X \setminus \operatorname{int}(X \setminus A). This construction yields the smallest containing AA, as it includes all limit points of AA along with AA itself. The boundary of AA, denoted bd(A)\operatorname{bd}(A), is the set of points in the closure of AA that do not belong to the interior of AA, so bd(A)=cl(A)int(A)\operatorname{bd}(A) = \operatorname{cl}(A) \setminus \operatorname{int}(A). Equivalently, it can be expressed as bd(A)=(Aint(A))(cl(XA)A)\operatorname{bd}(A) = (A \setminus \operatorname{int}(A)) \cup (\operatorname{cl}(X \setminus A) \setminus A), consisting precisely of those points in XX that are neither interior points of AA nor interior points of its complement. The boundary captures the "edge" of AA where the space transitions between AA and its complement. Several key properties relate these operators. The boundary bd(A)\operatorname{bd}(A) is always a closed set, since it is the intersection of the closed set cl(A)\operatorname{cl}(A) and the closed set Xint(A)X \setminus \operatorname{int}(A). Moreover, the interior int(A)\operatorname{int}(A) and exterior ext(A)\operatorname{ext}(A) are disjoint open sets whose union partitions the complement of the boundary: int(A)ext(A)=Xbd(A)\operatorname{int}(A) \cup \operatorname{ext}(A) = X \setminus \operatorname{bd}(A). A subset AA is open if and only if its boundary intersects AA trivially, i.e., bd(A)A=\operatorname{bd}(A) \cap A = \emptyset. These relations highlight how closure and boundary extend the interior operator to describe the full structure of sets in the space. In general, for any subset AXA \subseteq X, the inclusions int(A)Acl(A)\operatorname{int}(A) \subseteq A \subseteq \operatorname{cl}(A) hold, with equality on the left if and only if AA is open (since open sets equal their ) and equality on the right if and only if AA is closed (since closed sets equal their closures). This chain connects the core operators, showing how the interior determines both the "core" of AA and its "completion" via closure. Regular open sets provide a refinement of open sets, defined as those subsets AXA \subseteq X satisfying A=int(cl(A)) A = \operatorname{int}(\operatorname{cl}(A)). Unlike arbitrary open sets, regular open sets are stable under closure followed by interior, forming a basis for the in semiregular spaces and playing a central role in pointfree topology, where the of regular open sets generates the original without reference to points. This structure is particularly useful in constructive and descriptive set theory for axiomatizing spatial properties.

Examples

In Euclidean spaces

In Euclidean spaces, such as Rn\mathbb{R}^n equipped with the standard topology induced by the Euclidean metric, the interior of a set is computed by identifying the largest open subset contained within it, often visualized as removing the to reveal the "core" where every point has a neighborhood entirely inside the set. For instance, consider the open ball B(r,x)={yRnyx<r}B(r, x) = \{ y \in \mathbb{R}^n \mid \| y - x \| < r \}, which is already open by definition, as every point within it admits an open ball of positive radius contained in B(r,x)B(r, x); thus, its interior is itself, int(B(r,x))=B(r,x)\operatorname{int}(B(r, x)) = B(r, x). This property highlights how open balls serve as fundamental building blocks for open sets in Rn\mathbb{R}^n. A contrasting example arises with closed sets, where the interior excludes boundary points. In R\mathbb{R}, the closed interval [a,b][a, b] has interior (a,b)(a, b), since the endpoints aa and bb lack open neighborhoods entirely within [a,b][a, b], while every point in (a,b)(a, b) does. Similarly, in R2\mathbb{R}^2, the closed disk {(x,y)x2+y2r2}\{ (x, y) \mid x^2 + y^2 \leq r^2 \} has interior the open disk {(x,y)x2+y2<r2}\{ (x, y) \mid x^2 + y^2 < r^2 \}, effectively stripping away the boundary to leave a free of edge points; this visualization underscores the interior as the set's "fillable" core without its outline. The interior operation also interacts with set unions in intuitive ways. The union of the open intervals (0,1)(0,1) and (1,2)(1,2) is the open set (0,2){1}(0,2) \setminus \{1\}, so int((0,1)(1,2))=(0,1)(1,2)\operatorname{int}((0,1) \cup (1,2)) = (0,1) \cup (1,2). Points near 1 from either side remain interior points because small open intervals around them can be chosen to lie within the union. This illustrates that the union of open sets is open, even for adjacent intervals missing the connecting point. Dense subsets like the rational numbers Q\mathbb{Q} in R\mathbb{R} provide a stark counterexample, with empty interior int(Q)=\operatorname{int}(\mathbb{Q}) = \emptyset, as no nonempty open interval is contained entirely in Q\mathbb{Q} due to the irrationals interleaving everywhere; visually, Q\mathbb{Q} appears as a scattered dust with no solid open chunks. These examples illustrate the interior's role in distilling the open essence of sets in familiar metric spaces.

In general topological spaces

In general topological spaces, the interior of a subset AA, denoted int(A)\operatorname{int}(A), is the largest contained within AA, which can vary significantly depending on the chosen, illustrating the abstract flexibility of topological structures beyond metric-induced ones. In the discrete on a set XX, where every is open, the interior of any AXA \subseteq X is AA itself, as AA is open and contains no larger open set. Conversely, in the indiscrete (or on XX, where the only open sets are \emptyset and XX, the interior of any proper nonempty AXA \subsetneq X is \emptyset, while int(X)=X\operatorname{int}(X) = X. The Sierpinski space provides a simple finite example of this variability: consider X={0,1}X = \{0, 1\} with open sets {,{0},X}\{\emptyset, \{0\}, X\}; then int({0})={0}\operatorname{int}(\{0\}) = \{0\}, but int({1})=\operatorname{int}(\{1\}) = \emptyset, as {1}\{1\} contains no nonempty . In the cofinite topology on an XX, where open sets are those with finite complement (or \emptyset), the interior of a AXA \subseteq X is AA if AA is cofinite (i.e., XAX \setminus A is finite), and \emptyset if AA is finite and nonempty, since no nonempty can be contained in a finite AA. These examples highlight how coarse or fine topologies can make interiors trivial or maximal, contrasting with more regular spaces. In , interiors play a role in quotient spaces, where the interior of the image of a set under a continuous quotient map is contained in the image of its interior, aiding the study of properties preserved or altered under identifications.

Interior-disjoint sets

In a XX, a family of subsets {Ai}iI\{A_i\}_{i \in I} is interior-disjoint if int(Ai)int(Aj)=\operatorname{int}(A_i) \cap \operatorname{int}(A_j) = \emptyset for all iji \neq j, where int(Ai)\operatorname{int}(A_i) denotes the interior of AiA_i, the largest open of XX contained in AiA_i. This condition ensures that the open "cores" of the sets do not overlap, though the sets AiA_i themselves may intersect along boundaries. Such families possess key separation properties: the interiors int(Ai)\operatorname{int}(A_i) form a collection of pairwise disjoint open sets in XX, implying that each AiA_i can be separated from the others by these open neighborhoods around their respective interiors. In Rn\mathbb{R}^n, interior-disjoint sets correspond to configurations where the "insides" do not overlap, permitting boundary contact; this facilitates analyses of spatial arrangements without interior interference. A representative example occurs in R2\mathbb{R}^2, where a collection of closed disks can have touching boundaries (e.g., tangent at single points) while maintaining disjoint interiors, as seen in disk packings or triangulations of polygonal regions. Interior-disjoint families find applications in measure theory, where Lebesgue measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n is constructed by expressing open sets as countable unions of cubes with disjoint interiors; the measure of the union is then the sum of the individual volumes due to the non-overlapping interiors, ensuring additivity. In topology, particularly manifold theory, handle decompositions of nn-manifolds decompose the space into handles (products of disks) with pairwise disjoint interiors, allowing systematic attachment along boundaries to build the manifold structure. Similarly, in the study of Jordan domains, interior-disjoint Jordan curves bound planar regions without interior overlap, enabling non-crossing divisions useful for embedding graphs or analyzing connectivity in the plane.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.