Hubbry Logo
Kijong-dongKijong-dongMain
Open search
Kijong-dong
Community hub
Kijong-dong
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Kijong-dong
Kijong-dong
Kijong-dong
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Kijŏng-dong, Kijŏngdong, Kijŏng tong or Kaepoong is a Potemkin village in P'yŏnghwa-ri (Korean: 평화리; Hancha: 平和里),[1] Panmun-guyok,[a] Kaesong Special City, North Korea. It is situated in the North's half of the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ).[2] Also known in North Korea as Peace Village (Korean: 평화촌; Hancha: 平和村; MR: p'yŏnghwach'on),[3] it has been widely referred to as 'Propaganda Village' (Korean: 선전마을; Hanja: 宣傳마을; RR: seonjeon maeul) by those outside North Korea, especially in South Korean and Western media.[4][5][6][7][2]

Key Information

Kijŏng-dong is one of two villages permitted to remain in the 4 km (2.5 mi) wide DMZ set up under the 1953 armistice during the Korean War;[6][8] the other is the South Korean village of Daeseong-dong,[8] 2.22 kilometers (1.38 mi) away.

History

[edit]
The Panmunjom flagpole, the world's seventh-tallest, 160 m (525 ft) in height, flying a 270 kg (595 lb) flag of North Korea over Kijŏng-dong, near Panmunjom.
View of Kijŏng-dong

The North Korean government says the village contains a 200-family collective farm, serviced by a child care center, kindergarten, primary and secondary schools, and a hospital.[9] However, it is actually an uninhabited settlement built in the 1950s as part of a propaganda campaign to encourage South Korean defection. Some parts are used to garrison Korean People's Army soldiers manning a network of artillery positions, fortifications and underground marshalling bunkers along this part of the DMZ.[2][3][10][11]

The village features a number of brightly painted, poured-concrete multi-story buildings. Its layout is oriented so that the buildings' bright blue roofs and multi-colored walls beneath Kijong-dong's massive DPRK flag and flagpole, can be clearly seen from the South Korean border. Windows are either left unglazed or just painted onto exterior walls. Electrical lights on timers periodically turn on and off in some buildings.[12] The buildings are concrete shells that are maintained by caretakers in an effort to preserve the illusion of activity.[10][13][14]

Flagpole

[edit]

In the 1980s, the South Korean government built a 100 m (328 ft) tall flagpole with a 130-kilogram (287 lb) flag of South Korea in Daeseong-dong[10] (37°56′30.24″N 126°40′48.07″E / 37.9417333°N 126.6800194°E / 37.9417333; 126.6800194).

The North Korean government responded by building an even taller one, the Panmunjom flagpole, at 160 m (525 ft) with a 270 kg (595 lb) flag of North Korea in Kijŏng-dong, 1.2 km (0.7 mi) across the demarcation line from South Korea (37°56′42.99″N 126°39′18.78″E / 37.9452750°N 126.6552167°E / 37.9452750; 126.6552167), in what some have called the "flagpole war". For over a decade, the flagpole was the tallest in the world.[10] In 2010, the flagpole became the second-tallest flagpole in the world at the time, after the National Flag Square in Baku, Azerbaijan, at 162 m (531 ft).[10][15][16] It is now the ninth-tallest flagpole in the world, and the tallest supported one.

Propaganda loudspeakers

[edit]
Main article: Korean Demilitarized Zone loudspeakers

Massive loudspeakers mounted on several of the buildings deliver DPRK propaganda broadcasts directed towards the South.[10] Originally, the content extolled the North's virtues in great detail and urged disgruntled soldiers and farmers simply to walk across the border to be received as brothers.[17] As its value in inducing defections diminished over time, particularly as South Korea caught up with the North economically in the 1960s and 1970s,[18] the content was switched to condemnatory anti-Western speeches, agitprop operas, and patriotic marching music for up to 20 hours a day.[17] For a period from 2004 to 2016, both North and South agreed to end their loudspeaker broadcasts at each other.[19] The broadcasts resumed after escalating tensions as a result of the January 2016 nuclear test.[20] On 23 April 2018, both North and South Korea officially cancelled their border propaganda broadcasts.[21]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Kijong-dong

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Kijong-dong, also known as Gijeong-dong, is a North Korean settlement located within the (DMZ), approximately 1.2 kilometers north of the and directly opposite South Korea's Daesong-dong village. Established shortly after the 1953 armistice ending the , it serves as one of only two permitted civilian enclaves in the DMZ on the northern side, ostensibly functioning as a collective farm and to symbolize the prosperity of North Korean socialism. However, empirical observations from South Korean and military positions, including telescopic examinations and reports of synchronized lighting without corresponding human movement, indicate that the village is largely a constructed facade with empty concrete shell buildings lacking interiors or window glass, designed primarily for psychological operations to entice from the South. The village gained international notoriety for the Flagpole, a 160-meter-tall structure erected in the early bearing a 270-kilogram North Korean flag, which sparked a competitive escalation known as the "flagpole war" after South Korea raised its own 100-meter pole in response. North Korean authorities maintain loudspeakers broadcasting messages southward, while visible activities such as farming appear staged, with no sustained civilian presence beyond occasional , underscoring the site's role in sustained rather than genuine habitation. This characterization aligns with broader patterns of North Korean tactics, as noted in analyses of regime strategies dating back to Kim Il-sung's era.

Geography and Location

Position Relative to the DMZ and South Korea

Kijong-dong occupies the northern portion of the (DMZ), a 4-kilometer-wide buffer established by the 1953 Armistice Agreement signed on July 27. The agreement permitted only two civilian villages to remain populated within the DMZ: Kijong-dong on the North Korean side and on the side, both situated near the at . These exceptions allowed limited agricultural and residential activity under strict military oversight, while prohibiting other permanent settlements or fortifications in the zone. The village lies approximately 1–2 kilometers north of the (MDL), the de facto border bisecting the DMZ, placing it directly opposite in South Korea's . Its coordinates are roughly 37°57′N 126°39′E, positioning it within Kaesong County, , and ensuring the settlement falls entirely within the DMZ's northern half. This proximity to the MDL—closer than most other North Korean infrastructure—facilitates direct line-of-sight observation from South Korean territory across the 250-kilometer length of the zone. Kijong-dong's strategic placement maximizes visibility to South Korean and observation posts, including those at , where personnel can view the village through or from elevated vantage points without crossing the MDL. This visibility underscores the village's role in cross-border monitoring, as the flat terrain and minimal obstructions in the DMZ allow uninterrupted of activities in the area.

Historical Development

Post-Armistice Construction (1950s)

Following the signing of the on July 27, 1953, which created a 4-kilometer-wide (DMZ) and allowed each side to maintain one civilian village within it, began constructing Kijong-dong (also known as Gijeong-dong or Peace Village) in the northern portion of the DMZ. This development mirrored South Korea's preservation of the pre-existing village on the southern side, fulfilling the armistice's provisions for limited habitation while establishing a North Korean presence in the buffer area. The village was erected as part of North Korea's broader post-war reconstruction efforts, emphasizing state-directed recovery amid the country's agricultural collectivization drive, which accelerated in the mid-1950s. Initial construction focused on basic residential structures, communal facilities, and agricultural infrastructure aligned with North Korea's cooperative farm system, intended to showcase communal prosperity and self-sufficiency. Buildings included multistory residential blocks and farming setups, positioned visibly across the DMZ to project an image of rapid societal rebuilding to observers on the South Korean side. By the mid-1950s, the settlement featured essential elements such as housing for purported families and fields for cultivation, reflecting the regime's emphasis on through visible development in the armistice-permitted zone. The effort underscored North Korea's strategic use of the DMZ enclave to counterbalance South Korean narratives of stability, with the village serving as a foundational site from its inception. Early prioritized symbolic functionality over long-term habitation, aligning with the state's centralized to populate and cultivate the area as a cooperative farm demarcation village.

Escalation of Symbolic Competitions (1970s–1980s)

In the , installed large-scale loudspeakers in Kijong-dong, designed to broadcast messages and music across the into South Korean territory, with capabilities reaching distances of up to 20 kilometers or more under optimal conditions. These installations marked an escalation in psychological operations, transforming the village from a basic post-armistice outpost into a hub for auditory competitions amid ongoing inter-Korean tensions. The symbolic rivalry intensified in 1980 when erected a 98-meter flagpole in flying a 130-kilogram , prompting to construct a taller 160-meter in Kijong-dong—the world's tallest at the time—hoisting a heavier 270-kilogram to assert dominance. This "flagpole war" exemplified the competitive displays between the two Koreas, where infrastructural feats served as proxies for ideological superiority during a period that included sporadic inter-Korean dialogues, such as the prime ministerial talks initiated in 1980. These developments in Kijong-dong reflected a broader pattern of escalation in the DMZ, where leveraged visible and audible symbols to counter South Korean advancements, even as diplomatic overtures occurred intermittently throughout the and . The flagpole and loudspeakers not only amplified efforts but also underscored the persistent rivalry underlying formal negotiations.

Physical Characteristics

Architectural Features and Infrastructure

Kijong-dong consists of approximately 200 multi-story buildings constructed to mimic urban residential and institutional structures, including apartments, schools, and administrative facilities. These edifices are poured- constructions painted in vivid colors such as red, blue, and white to maximize visibility from South Korean observation points across the DMZ. Many feature distinctive blue-tiled roofs, contrasting with the typically subdued in rural . The village's infrastructure includes paved roads traversing the settlement, utility poles aligned along these paths, and a prominent visible from afar. Electric systems are installed throughout, with lights activated in building windows during evenings to simulate habitation and functionality. A central monumental element is the flagpole, erected in 1982 at a height of 160 meters (525 feet), designed to dominate the skyline and support a large North Korean flag. External maintenance ensures the facades remain pristine, with periodic repainting and cleaning observable via from the southern side of the DMZ. Structures exhibit design elements, such as rectangular windows and balconies, projecting an image of organized modernity despite the remote location. No internal connectivity for utilities beyond surface-level displays has been verified through distant visual inspections.

Claimed Agricultural and Residential Elements

North Korean officials portray Kijong-dong as a model collective farm, akin to Soviet-style kolkhozes, where residents engage in agricultural production on surrounding fields dedicated to crop cultivation. These fields, visible from observation points on the South Korean side, include plowed areas suggesting agrarian use, such as for grains and vegetables typical of North Korean farming practices. The village's layout emphasizes this rural productivity, with infrastructure purportedly supporting farming operations, though specific crop yields or integration, such as or , are not detailed in official descriptions beyond general . Residential elements are claimed to accommodate around 200 families, primarily farmers allotted substantial land parcels for cultivation, enabling higher-than-average household incomes through communal output. Housing consists of multi-story apartment blocks and low-rise structures designed for communal living, supplemented by social facilities including a , , childcare center, and to sustain family life and continuity. These amenities are presented as fostering a self-sufficient , with observable buildings and pathways indicating planned residential zones, albeit with limited visible daily routines from afar.

Propaganda Mechanisms

Visual and Auditory Displays

Visual displays in Kijong-dong feature periodic appearances by caretakers who sweep sidewalks and perform maintenance tasks during daytime hours observable from South Korean border posts, projecting an image of routine civilian activity. These actions occur amid otherwise empty streets and fields, with no evidence of genuine residential or agricultural labor. The Panmunjom flagpole, standing 160 meters tall and flying a 270 kg North Korean flag, serves as a prominent landmark designed for visibility across the DMZ, emphasizing symbolic dominance. At night, electric lights within the village's buildings activate via automatic timers, simulating occupancy and ongoing life in the settlement. This timed illumination aligns with periods when South Korean observers could potentially detect activity through or equipment. Auditory elements historically included loudspeakers mounted on buildings that broadcast messages lauding North Korea's achievements, revolutionary songs, and appeals for South Korean , directed southward until their suspension in 2004. These transmissions operated continuously during the day, timed to reach audiences along the during standard operational hours.

Operational Patterns and Maintenance

Kijong-dong is maintained by a small team of caretakers tasked with preserving its outward appearance of functionality, with observations indicating only sporadic human presence primarily for upkeep rather than sustained habitation. These workers, often described as a skeleton crew, perform visible tasks such as street sweeping during daylight hours to simulate ongoing activity, departing at night and showing no signs of residential occupancy. Electric lighting in the village operates via automatic timers, enabling illumination without requiring constant manual intervention and contributing to the illusion of a lived-in settlement after dark. Caretakers also handle basic building maintenance, including occasional repairs to facades, though external monitoring has noted a lack of updates reflecting natural or agricultural expansion. This pattern of intermittent staffing and automated features minimizes resource demands while upholding the site's visual coherence from afar.

Verification and Controversies

North Korean Assertions of Habitation

North Korean and officials have portrayed Kijong-dong as a functional and prosperous community, home to approximately 200 families who engage in on irrigated fields and operate light industries to support local self-sufficiency. The village is depicted as providing for residents, with agricultural output sufficient to meet communal needs, including and cultivation on terraced plots visible from the . Essential infrastructure is claimed to include two schools, a kindergarten, a childcare center, and a hospital, facilitating and healthcare for the and underscoring the state's commitment to resident welfare. These elements are presented in official narratives as embodying principles of self-reliance, with families tending cooperative farms as a symbol of ideological success amid the Demilitarized Zone's constraints. Controlled tours organized by North Korean authorities for limited foreign visitors have featured scenes of populated daily activities, such as farming and communal gatherings, to affirm the village's habitation and vibrancy while rejecting external characterizations of vacancy.

from External s

South Korean military personnel stationed at observation posts along the DMZ, equipped with high-powered telescopes and , have reported consistent absence of daytime human activity in Kijong-dong since the village's construction in the . These observations document empty streets accumulating dust, with no visible pedestrians, vehicles, or agricultural work beyond occasional movements by uniformed personnel. Windows in many structures appear devoid of glass, often featuring painted facades instead, suggesting concrete shells lacking functional interiors. Nighttime lighting patterns further indicate mechanical operation rather than organic habitation. Lights in Kijong-dong illuminate uniformly at and extinguish simultaneously at dawn, without variation tied to , seasons, or events that would typify residential use. No evidence of responsive adjustments, such as increased illumination during power shortages elsewhere in , has been noted in these ground-based surveillances. Limited commercial corroborates the lack of vitality, showing static structural outlines without discernible heat signatures, waste disposal, or infrastructural expansion indicative of sustained population. South Korean and U.S. analysts interpret these as supporting the facade hypothesis, though resolution constraints hinder interior verification. Defector accounts from DMZ-adjacent regions, while not directly from Kijong-dong residents, describe similar setups with minimal civilian presence, restricted to caretakers rotating under military oversight.

Challenges in Confirmation and Debates

Verification of Kijong-dong's habitation status is hampered by the Korean Demilitarized Zone's stringent access restrictions, which bar physical entry and on-ground surveys for external observers, necessitating dependence on indirect methods like satellite remote sensing and distant visual monitoring from South Korean observation posts. These approaches yield partial , as high-resolution struggles to penetrate building interiors or distinguish between genuine residents and potential staged personnel during brief, observable intervals. Debates persist over equivocal indicators, including occasional satellite-detected crop patterns or fleeting human figures in fields, which some interpret as minimal agricultural use versus orchestrated displays to feign vitality amid broader evidence of disuse, such as unchanging facades and automated nocturnal illumination. South Korean military assessments, derived from prolonged border surveillance, emphasize the absence of sustained daily routines consistent with a viable , yet acknowledge the interpretive introduced by North Korea's opacity. Unlike on the southern side, where population figures are publicly tracked via national records—declining from 218 residents in 2008 to around 188 by 2019, predominantly elderly farmers under UN Command oversight—Kijong-dong offers no comparable verifiable censuses or demographic disclosures since the 1953 armistice. North Korean claims of ongoing settlement lack substantiation through independent audits or defector accounts tied directly to the village, perpetuating uncertainty in causal assessments of its purported functionality.

Broader Implications

Role in Inter-Korean Psychological Warfare

Kijong-dong was established by North Korea after the 1953 Korean War armistice to project an image of prosperity, ostensibly to lure South Korean defectors across the DMZ by contrasting it with southern conditions. This facade integrated into wider inter-Korean psychological operations, including daily loudspeaker broadcasts from the village of Kim Il-sung speeches, revolutionary songs, and anti-South rhetoric, intended to erode southern morale and encourage ideological shifts without kinetic engagement. The village contributed to symbolic escalations such as the 1980s "flagpole war," where raised a 98-meter in Daesong-dong in 1983, prompting to erect a taller 160-meter pole in Kijong-dong by 1986 to visually dominate the skyline and underscore regime superiority in this non-violent contest of wills. These actions exemplified a pattern of competitive posturing along the border, mirroring loudspeaker duels where each side amplified to drown out the other, sustaining tension through auditory and visual one-upmanship rather than armed conflict. Empirical records indicate negligible success in prompting South Korean defections via the DMZ, with only isolated incidents—such as a single verified crossing in January —occurring sporadically and unattributed to the village's allure, amid thousands of annual North-to-South defections driven by regime hardships. Instead, external observations have portrayed Kijong-dong's maintenance as a resource-intensive that fortified South Korean determination and fueled perceptions of North Korean unreliability, diminishing its utility as southern economic advances outpaced northern claims from the 1960s onward.

Symbolism in Global Perceptions of North Korea

Kijong-dong exemplifies the "" archetype in international discourse on , where elaborate facades mask underlying emptiness to project an illusion of prosperity and normalcy. Constructed in the 1950s along the , the settlement features brightly painted multi-story buildings, manicured fields, and daily routines visible from South Korean observation posts, yet external analyses consistently describe it as largely uninhabited, with structures lacking rear walls or functional interiors designed primarily for visual impact. This setup symbolizes the regime's strategic emphasis on perceptual manipulation over tangible welfare, diverting limited resources to sustain the appearance of a thriving socialist paradise amid widespread domestic deprivation. Global media portrayals, particularly in documentaries and articles from the onward, have reinforced Kijong-dong as a stark emblem of deception, influencing toward Pyongyang's diplomatic overtures and bolstering arguments for stringent sanctions. For instance, coverage highlights how the village's automated lighting and staged activities—such as synchronized farming demonstrations—serve to lure potential defectors from the while concealing the regime's internal realities, framing it as a microcosm of broader tactics that prioritize regime survival through illusion. These depictions contribute to perceptions of as a state where governance hinges on opacity and control, eroding trust in official narratives and underscoring the challenges of verifying claims in a closed . The symbolism extends to critiques of authoritarian , where investments in facade maintenance persist despite chronic food insecurity affecting millions; a 2024 study of recent defectors revealed that over 72% received no government rations between 2016 and 2020, reflecting systemic prioritization of ideological displays over basic needs. reports from 2023 further note that funds directed toward military and nuclear programs—mirroring the upkeep of sites like Kijong-dong—exacerbate civilian hardships, illustrating a causal pattern where external image management sustains internal repression at the expense of economic functionality. This dynamic shapes global views of the Kim regime as one defined by performative symbolism rather than substantive development, informing debates on versus isolation.

References

  1. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/02/why-is-north-korea-showing-off-its-icbms.html
  2. https://direct.mit.edu/daed/article/149/4/192/94871/Slow-Disaster-in-the-Anthropocene-A-Historian
  3. https://www.benning.army.mil/infantry/magazine/issues/1999/SEP-DEC/pdfs/SEP-DEC99.pdf
  4. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/91403/893485477-MIT.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
  5. https://www.nkeconwatch.com/2008/08/18/the-dprks-tallest-flagpole-in-the-world/
  6. https://www.army.mil/article/175166/stallion_soldiers_learn_about_korean_armistice_firsthand
  7. https://www.youngpioneertours.com/dmz-panmunjom/
  8. https://battlefieldtravels.com/jsa-panmunjon/
  9. https://www.viator.com/blog/Know-Before-You-Go-Visiting-the-DMZ-Korean-Demilitarized-Zone/l99388
  10. https://barrysborderpoints.com/country-visits/south-korea/dmz/
  11. https://latitude.to/articles-by-country/kp/north-korea/6606/kijong-dong
  12. https://www.earthnutshell.com/the-worlds-most-dangerous-border-a-tour-of-north-koreas-dmz/
  13. https://www.latimes.com/sports/olympics/la-sp-olympics-north-korea-mystery-20180217-story.html
  14. http://www.earthnutshell.com/the-worlds-most-dangerous-border-a-tour-of-north-koreas-dmz/
  15. https://nowiknow.com/kijong-dong/
  16. https://mediamax.am/en/news/special-report/51019
  17. https://factsanddetails.com/korea/North_Korea/Economics_and_Agriculture_2/entry-7426.html
  18. https://en.namu.wiki/w/%25EA%25B8%25B0%25EC%25A0%2595%25EB%258F%2599
  19. http://www.slate.com/blogs/atlas_obscura/2013/10/14/a_fake_village_and_a_colossal_flagpole_north_korea_s_bizarre_propaganda.html
  20. https://theramblingwombat.com/2017/03/19/kijong-dong-village-is-it-or-isnt-it-real/
  21. https://boingboing.net/2014/07/08/north-koreas-creepy-fake-civ.html
  22. https://www.psywarrior.com/korea.html
  23. https://99percentinvisible.org/article/hostile-terrain-tank-traps-fake-towns-secret-tunnels-korean-borderlands/
  24. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-43806930
  25. https://explanders.com/east-central-asia/north_korea/kijong-dong/
  26. https://www.amusingplanet.com/2018/08/the-strange-case-of-kijong-dong-and.html
  27. https://aura.american.edu/articles/thesis/The_politics_of_inter_-Korean_negotiations_1971--1992/23866059
  28. https://www.koreakonsult.com/Attraction_DMZ_eng.html
  29. https://business.columbia.edu/sites/default/files-efs/imce-uploads/PFS/APEC_New/Armstrong22.pdf
  30. https://allthatsinteresting.com/peace-village-north-korea
  31. https://www.slate.com/blogs/atlas_obscura/2013/10/14/a_fake_village_and_a_colossal_flagpole_north_korea_s_bizarre_propaganda.html
  32. https://nypost.com/2014/07/11/the-mysterious-fake-town-on-north-koreas-border/
  33. https://erosbonazzi.altervista.org/the-strange-case-of-kijong-dong/
  34. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/69043-tallest-flagpole
  35. https://www.news.com.au/travel/destinations/kijongdong-in-north-korea-is-a-propaganda-town-luring-south-korean-defectors/news-story/8c1cbe688cd22e8a8aa96173af4e3b15
  36. https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2008.00714.x
  37. https://www.maloriesadventures.com/blog/kijong-dong-all-you-need-to-know-about-north-koreas-fake-border-city
  38. https://leightontravels.com/2020/11/03/touring-the-surreal-dmz-in-korea/
  39. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/is-there-a-fake-city-in-north-korea.html
  40. https://www.nypost.com/2014/07/11/the-mysterious-fake-town-on-north-koreas-border/
  41. https://everything-everywhere.com/the-korean-demilitarized-zone-dmz/
  42. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/708
  43. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/20/world/asia/as-tensions-rise-between-the-koreas-farming-in-the-demilitarized-zone-goes-on.html
  44. https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/tiny-south-korean-village-dmz-future-5g-network/story?id=65880640
  45. https://abcnews.go.com/International/north-korea-now-blasting-choral-folk-music-dmz/story?id=53239633
  46. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-59851097
  47. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/02/south-korean-crosses-demilitarised-zone-in-rare-defection-to-north
  48. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-counterfeit-paris-and-other-fake-cities-built-in-the-name-of-espionage
  49. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/north-korea-defectors-cite-dwindling-food-rations-market-reliance-study-2024-02-06/
  50. https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15387.doc.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.