Pilot wave theory

Louis de Broglie's early results on the pilot wave theory were presented in his thesis (1924) in the context of atomic orbitals where the waves are stationary. Early attempts to develop a general formulation for the dynamics of these guiding waves in terms of a relativistic wave equation were unsuccessful until in 1926 Schrödinger developed his non-relativistic wave equation. He further suggested that since the equation described waves in configuration space, the particle model should be abandoned.^[4] Shortly thereafter,^[5] Max Born suggested that the wave function of Schrödinger's wave equation represents the probability density of finding a particle. Following these results, de Broglie developed the dynamical equations for his pilot wave theory.^[6] Initially, de Broglie proposed a double solution approach, in which the quantum object consists of a physical wave (u-wave) in real space which has a spherical singular region that gives rise to particle-like behaviour; in this initial form of his theory he did not have to postulate the existence of a quantum particle.^[7] He later formulated it as a theory in which a particle is accompanied by a pilot wave.

De Broglie presented the pilot wave theory at the 1927 Solvay Conference.^[8] However, Wolfgang Pauli raised an objection to it at the conference, saying that it did not deal properly with the case of inelastic scattering. De Broglie was not able to find a response to this objection, and he abandoned the pilot-wave approach. Unlike David Bohm years later, de Broglie did not complete his theory to encompass the many-particle case.^[7] The many-particle case shows mathematically that the energy dissipation in inelastic scattering could be distributed to the surrounding field structure by a yet-unknown mechanism of the theory of hidden variables.^{[clarification needed]}

In 1932, John von Neumann published a book,^[9] part of which claimed to prove that all hidden variable theories were impossible. This result was found to be flawed by Grete Hermann^[10][11] three years later, though for a variety of reasons this went unnoticed by the physics community for over fifty years.

In 1952, David Bohm, dissatisfied with the prevailing orthodoxy, rediscovered de Broglie's pilot wave theory. Bohm developed pilot wave theory into what is now called the de Broglie–Bohm theory.^[12][13] The de Broglie–Bohm theory itself might have gone unnoticed by most physicists, if it had not been championed by John Bell, who also countered the objections to it. In 1987, John Bell rediscovered Grete Hermann's work,^[14] and thus showed the physics community that Pauli's and von Neumann's objections only showed that the pilot wave theory did not have locality.

The pilot wave theory is a hidden-variable theory. Consequently:

• the theory has realism (meaning that its concepts exist independently of the observer);
• the theory has determinism.

The positions of the particles are considered to be the hidden variables. The observer doesn't know the precise values of these variables; they cannot know them precisely because any measurement disturbs them. On the other hand, the observer is defined not by the wave function of their own atoms but by the atoms' positions. So what one sees around oneself are also the positions of nearby things, not their wave functions.

A collection of particles has an associated matter wave which evolves according to the Schrödinger equation. Each particle follows a deterministic trajectory, which is guided by the wave function; collectively, the density of the particles conforms to the magnitude of the wave function. The wave function is not influenced by the particle and can exist also as an empty wave function.^[16]

The theory brings to light nonlocality that is implicit in the non-relativistic formulation of quantum mechanics and uses it to satisfy Bell's theorem. These nonlocal effects can be shown to be compatible with the no-communication theorem, which prevents use of them for faster-than-light communication, and so is empirically compatible with relativity.^[17]

Couder, Fort, et al. claimed^[18] that macroscopic oil droplets on a vibrating fluid bath can be used as an analogue model of pilot waves; a localized droplet creates a periodical wave field around itself. They proposed that resonant interaction between the droplet and its own wave field exhibits behaviour analogous to quantum particles: interference in double-slit experiment,^[19] unpredictable tunneling^[20] (depending in a complicated way on a practically hidden state of field), orbit quantization^[21] (that a particle has to 'find a resonance' with field perturbations it creates—after one orbit, its internal phase has to return to the initial state) and Zeeman effect.^[22] While attempts to reproduce these experiments have shown some aspects to be questionable^[23] and the interpretation with respect to quantum mechanics has been challenged,^[24] work on the concept has continued with some success.^[25]

To derive the de Broglie–Bohm pilot-wave for an electron, the quantum Lagrangian

${\displaystyle L(t)={\frac {1}{2}}mv^{2}-(V+Q),}$

where ${\displaystyle V}$ is the potential energy, ${\displaystyle v}$ is the velocity and ${\displaystyle Q}$ is the potential associated with the quantum force (the particle being pushed by the wave function), is integrated along precisely one path (the one the electron actually follows). This leads to the following formula for the Bohm propagator^{[citation needed]}:

${\displaystyle K^{Q}(X_{1},t_{1};X_{0},t_{0})={\frac {1}{J(t)^{\frac {1}{2}}}}\exp \left[{\frac {i}{\hbar }}\int _{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}L(t)\,dt\right].}$

This propagator allows one to precisely track the electron over time under the influence of the quantum potential ${\displaystyle Q}$.

Pilot wave theory is based on Hamilton–Jacobi dynamics,^[26] rather than Lagrangian or Hamiltonian dynamics. Using the Hamilton–Jacobi equation

${\displaystyle H\left(\,{\vec {x}}\,,\;{\vec {\nabla }}_{\!x}\,S\,,\;t\,\right)+{\partial S \over \partial t}\left(\,{\vec {x}},\,t\,\right)=0}$

it is possible to derive the Schrödinger equation:

Consider a classical particle – the position of which is not known with certainty. We must deal with it statistically, so only the probability density ${\displaystyle \rho ({\vec {x}},t)}$ is known. Probability must be conserved, i.e. ${\displaystyle \int \rho \,\mathrm {d} ^{3}{\vec {x}}=1}$ for each ${\displaystyle t}$. Therefore, it must satisfy the continuity equation

${\displaystyle {\frac {\,\partial \rho \,}{\partial t}}=-{\vec {\nabla }}\cdot (\rho \,{\vec {v}})\qquad \qquad (1)}$

where ${\displaystyle \,{\vec {v}}({\vec {x}},t)\,}$ is the velocity of the particle.

In the Hamilton–Jacobi formulation of classical mechanics, velocity is given by ${\displaystyle \;{\vec {v}}({\vec {x}},t)={\frac {1}{\,m\,}}\,{\vec {\nabla }}_{\!x}S({\vec {x}},\,t)\;}$ where ${\displaystyle \,S({\vec {x}},t)\,}$ is a solution of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation

${\displaystyle -{\frac {\partial S}{\partial t}}={\frac {\;\left|\,\nabla S\,\right|^{2}\,}{2m}}+{\tilde {V}}\qquad \qquad (2)}$

${\displaystyle \,(1)\,}$ and ${\displaystyle \,(2)\,}$ can be combined into a single complex equation by introducing the complex function ${\displaystyle \;\psi ={\sqrt {\rho \,}}\,e^{\frac {\,i\,S\,}{\hbar }}\;,}$ then the two equations are equivalent to

${\displaystyle i\,\hbar \,{\frac {\,\partial \psi \,}{\partial t}}=\left(-{\frac {\hbar ^{2}}{2m}}\nabla ^{2}+{\tilde {V}}-Q\right)\psi \quad }$

with

${\displaystyle \;Q=-{\frac {\;\hbar ^{2}\,}{\,2m\,}}{\frac {\nabla ^{2}{\sqrt {\rho \,}}}{\sqrt {\rho \,}}}~.}$

The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is obtained if we start with ${\displaystyle \;{\tilde {V}}=V+Q\;,}$ the usual potential with an extra quantum potential ${\displaystyle Q}$. The quantum potential is the potential of the quantum force, which is proportional (in approximation) to the curvature of the amplitude of the wave function.

Note this potential is the same one that appears in the Madelung equations, a classical analog of the Schrödinger equation.

The matter wave of de Broglie is described by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation:

${\displaystyle i\,\hbar \,{\frac {\,\partial \psi \,}{\partial t}}=\left(-{\frac {\hbar ^{2}}{\,2m\,}}\nabla ^{2}+V\right)\psi \quad }$

The complex wave function can be represented as:

${\displaystyle \psi ={\sqrt {\rho \,}}\;\exp \left({\frac {i\,S}{\hbar }}\right)~}$

By plugging this into the Schrödinger equation, one can derive two new equations for the real variables. The first is the continuity equation for the probability density ${\displaystyle \,\rho \,:}$^[12]

${\displaystyle {\frac {\,\partial \rho \,}{\,\partial t\,}}+{\vec {\nabla }}\cdot \left(\rho \,{\vec {v}}\right)=0~,}$

where the velocity field is determined by the “guidance equation”

${\displaystyle {\vec {v}}\left(\,{\vec {r}},\,t\,\right)={\frac {1}{\,m\,}}\,{\vec {\nabla }}S\left(\,{\vec {r}},\,t\,\right)~.}$

According to pilot wave theory, the point particle and the matter wave are both real and distinct physical entities (unlike standard quantum mechanics, which postulates no physical particle or wave entities, only observed wave-particle duality). The pilot wave guides the motion of the point particles as described by the guidance equation.

Ordinary quantum mechanics and pilot wave theory are based on the same partial differential equation. The main difference is that in ordinary quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger equation is connected to reality by the Born postulate, which states that the probability density of the particle's position is given by ${\displaystyle \;\rho =|\psi |^{2}~.}$ Pilot wave theory considers the guidance equation to be the fundamental law, and sees the Born rule as a derived concept.

The second equation is a modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation for the action S:

${\displaystyle -{\frac {\partial S}{\partial t}}={\frac {\;\left|\,{\vec {\nabla }}S\,\right|^{2}\,}{\,2m\,}}+V+Q~,}$

where Q is the quantum potential defined by

${\displaystyle Q=-{\frac {\hbar ^{2}}{\,2m\,}}{\frac {\nabla ^{2}{\sqrt {\rho \,}}}{\sqrt {\rho \,}}}~.}$

If we choose to neglect Q, our equation is reduced to the Hamilton–Jacobi equation of a classical point particle.^[a] So, the quantum potential is responsible for all the mysterious effects of quantum mechanics.

One can also combine the modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation with the guidance equation to derive a quasi-Newtonian equation of motion

${\displaystyle m\,{\frac {d}{dt}}\,{\vec {v}}=-{\vec {\nabla }}(V+Q)~,}$

where the hydrodynamic time derivative is defined as

${\displaystyle {\frac {d}{dt}}={\frac {\partial }{\,\partial t\,}}+{\vec {v}}\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}~.}$

The Schrödinger equation for the many-body wave function ${\displaystyle \psi ({\vec {r}}_{1},{\vec {r}}_{2},\cdots ,t)}$ is given by

${\displaystyle i\hbar {\frac {\partial \psi }{\partial t}}=\left(-{\frac {\hbar ^{2}}{2}}\sum _{i=1}^{N}{\frac {\nabla _{i}^{2}}{m_{i}}}+V(\mathbf {r} _{1},\mathbf {r} _{2},\cdots \mathbf {r} _{N})\right)\psi }$

The complex wave function can be represented as:

${\displaystyle \psi ={\sqrt {\rho \,}}\;\exp \left({\frac {i\,S}{\hbar }}\right)}$

The pilot wave guides the motion of the particles. The guidance equation for the jth particle is:

${\displaystyle {\vec {v}}_{j}={\frac {\nabla _{j}S}{m_{j}}}\;.}$

The velocity of the jth particle explicitly depends on the positions of the other particles. This means that the theory is nonlocal.

An extension to the relativistic case with spin has been developed since the 1990s.^{[27][28][29][30][31][32]}

Lucien Hardy^[33] and John Stewart Bell^[16] have emphasized that in the de Broglie–Bohm picture of quantum mechanics there can exist empty waves, represented by wave functions propagating in space and time but not carrying energy or momentum,^[34] and not associated with a particle. The same concept was called ghost waves (or "Gespensterfelder", ghost fields) by Albert Einstein.^[34] The empty wave function notion has been discussed controversially.^[35][36][37] In contrast, the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics does not call for empty wave functions.^[16]

• Hydrodynamic quantum analogues
• Quantum potential