Hubbry Logo
Pipe rollsPipe rollsMain
Open search
Pipe rolls
Community hub
Pipe rolls
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pipe rolls
Pipe rolls
Pipe rolls
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Pipe rolls, sometimes called the Great rolls[1] or the Great Rolls of the Pipe, are a collection of financial records maintained by the English Exchequer, or Treasury, and its successors, as well as the Exchequer of Ireland. The earliest date from the 12th century, and the series extends, mostly complete, from then until 1833.[2] They form the oldest continuous series of records concerning English governance kept by the English, British, Irish, and United Kingdom governments, covering a span of about 700 years. The early medieval ones are especially useful for historical study, as they are some of the earliest financial records available from the Middle Ages. A similar set of records was developed for Normandy, which was ruled by the English kings from 1066 to 1205, but the Norman Pipe rolls have not survived in a continuous series like the English.

Key Information

They were the records of the yearly audits performed by the Exchequer of the accounts and payments presented to the Treasury by the sheriffs and other royal officials, and owed their name to the shape they took, as the various sheets were affixed to each other and then rolled into a tight roll, resembling a pipe, for storage. They record not only payments made to the government, but debts owed to the crown and disbursements made by royal officials. Although they recorded much of the royal income, they did not record all types of income, nor did they record all expenditures, so they are not strictly speaking a budget. The Pipe Roll Society, formed in 1883, has published the Pipe rolls for the period up to 1224.

Composition

[edit]

The Pipe rolls are named after the "pipe" shape formed by the rolled-up parchments on which the records were originally written.[3] There is no evidence to support the theory that they were named pipes for the fact that they "piped" the money into the Treasury, nor for the claim that they got their name from resembling a wine cask, or pipe of wine.[4] They were occasionally referred to as the roll of the treasury, or the great roll of accounts, and the great roll of the pipe.[4]

The Pipe rolls are the records of the audits of the sheriffs' accounts, usually conducted at Michaelmas by the Exchequer, or English treasury.[5] Until the chancery records began in the reign of King John of England, they were the only continuous set of records kept by the English government.[2] They are not a complete record of government and royal finances, however, as they do not record all sources of income, only the accounts of the sheriffs and a few other sources of income. Some of the payments that did not regularly fall under the Exchequer were occasionally recorded in a Pipe roll. Neither do the Pipe rolls record all payments made by the exchequer.[2] They were not created as a budget, nor were they strictly speaking records of receipts, but rather they are records of the audit of the accounts rendered.[6] Although the rolls use an accounting system, it is not one that would be familiar to modern accountants; for instance until the end of the 12th century, no record was made of the total amount taken in by the sheriff of each shire.[2] In their early form, they record all debts owed to the Crown, whether from feudal dues or from other sources. Given that many debts to the king were allowed to be paid off in instalments, it is necessary to search more than one set of rolls for a complete history of a debt.[7] If a debt was not paid off completely in one year, the remainder of the amount owed was transferred to the next year. They did not record the full amount of debts incurred in previous years, only what was paid that year and what was still owed.[8] Besides the sheriffs, others who submitted accounts for the audit included some bailiffs of various honours, town officials, and the custodians of ecclesiastical and feudal estates.[9]

The earliest surviving Pipe roll, already in a mature form, dates from 1129–30,[10][a] and the continuous series begins in 1155–56,[3] and continued for almost seven hundred years.[4]

Combined with the Domesday Book of 1086, the Pipe rolls contributed to the centralisation of financial records by the Norman kings (reigned 1066–1154) of England that was ahead of contemporary Western European monarchies; the French, for instance, did not have an equivalent system of accounting until the 1190s.[11] The exact form of the records, kept in a roll instead of a book, was also unique to England,[12] although why England kept some of its administrative records in this form is unclear.[13] A set of Norman rolls, drafted differently, are extant in a few years for the reigns of Kings Henry II (reigned 1154–1189) and Richard I (reigned 1189–1199), who also ruled the Duchy of Normandy in France.[14][15] It is believed that the Norman rolls were started about the same time as the English, but due to lack of survival of the earlier Norman rolls, it is unclear exactly when they did start.[16] An Irish Exchequer produced Irish Pipe rolls, and much like the English Pipe rolls, the earliest surviving Irish Pipe roll, that of 1212, does not appear to be the first produced.[17]

Extract from the pipe rolls of Cloyne, Ireland, for the year 1354.

The Dialogus de Scaccario or Dialogue concerning the Exchequer, written in about 1178, details the workings of the Exchequer and gives an early account of how the Pipe rolls were created.[18] The Dialogue was written by Richard FitzNeal, the son of Nigel of Ely, who was Treasurer for both Henry I and Henry II of England.[5] According to the Dialogue, the Pipe rolls were the responsibility of the clerk of the Treasurer, who was called the Clerk of the Pipe and later the clerk of the pells.[18] FitzNeal wrote his work to explain the inner workings of the Exchequer, and in it he lists a number of different types of rolls used by the Treasury. He also describes the creation of the Pipe rolls and how they are used.[19] The Dialogue also states that the Pipe rolls, along with Domesday Book and other records, were kept in the treasury, because they were required for daily use by the Exchequer clerks.[20]

The main source of income recorded on the Pipe rolls was the county farm, or income derived from lands held by the king.[21] Occasional sources of revenue, such as from vacant bishoprics or abbeys or other sources, were also recorded.[22] The payments were made both in coin, or in objects, such as spurs, lands, spices, or livestock.[23] The only surviving roll from Henry I's reign also records payments of geld, a form of land tax dating from Anglo-Saxon times,[24] although after 1161 the Pipe rolls no longer record any payments of geld.[25][b] By 1166, the fines and other monetary income of the Assizes, or royal courts, began to be recorded in the Pipe rolls.[26][27] Scutage payments, made by knights in lieu of military service, were also recorded in the Pipe rolls from the reign of Henry II on.[28][29][c]

Although they recorded all income that came through the Exchequer, not all sources of income went through that office, so the Pipe rolls are not a complete record of royal income. They did include both regular income from the royal lands and judicial profits, as well as more occasional income derived from feudal levies, wardships, and ecclesiastical vacancies.[32] Another source of income recorded in the rolls was from feudal reliefs, the payment made by an heir when inheriting an estate.[33][34] A major source of income in the roll of 1130 is from the forests, under the Forest Law,[35] which was the royal law covering the restrictions imposed on non-royals hunting in areas of the country declared royal forest.[36] However, royal income from taxation that was not annually assessed was not usually recorded in the Pipe rolls, nor were his receipts from lands outside England. Some payments went directly to the king's household, and because they did not pass through the Exchequer, they were not recorded in the Pipe rolls.[37]

Expenditures were also subject to documentation in the Pipe rolls. Among the recorded expenditures are payments for carts and cart horses,[38] wages for royal servants, payments for improvements to royal manors and houses, royal gifts to persons,[39] hunting expenses,[36] payments to acquire a governmental office,[40] payments to mercenaries,[41] and the costs of bags and casks to transport silver pennies about the kingdom.[42]

Information about other subjects besides revenues also is contained in the rolls, including the movement of prisoners, which helps to identify which medieval castles were used as prisons.[43] The Pipe rolls also allow the identification of the custodians of royal lands and castles.[44] The clerks writing the rolls also used them as places to deride officials of the government, such as William Longchamp, who was the object of derision in the 1194 Pipe roll.[45]

Certain areas did not report their income to the Exchequer, so they do not usually appear in the Pipe rolls, unless the lands were in the king's custody through a vacancy. These included the palatinates of Durham and Chester.[46] The county of Cornwall also did not usually appear in the Pipe rolls, but it was not a palatinate.[47] Another problem with using the Pipe rolls for historical study is the fact that the chronological limits for the financial year varied from roll to roll.[48] In theory, they only recorded revenues from the previous Easter to Michaelmas of that financial year. However, the Pipe rolls often record payments made past Michaelmas, often up until the date the roll was actually compiled. Also, a few debts were not audited annually, but would instead have a number of consecutive years be investigated in one sitting and thus several years of payments would be recorded in one Pipe roll.[49]

History

[edit]
Entrance to The National Archives, where the Pipe rolls are now held

Although the earliest Pipe roll dates from 1130, the 31st year of King Henry I's reign, it is clear that they were being produced by the Exchequer before then, as the 1130 roll is not an experiment. It shows no hesitancy in its use of accounts, or lack of continuity from previous years.[50] An extract from an earlier Pipe roll, from the 25th regnal year of Henry I or 1124, has been found in a 14th-century manuscript now in the Cotton Library at the British Library.[51][d] The exact time of the first production of Pipe rolls is debated amongst historians. Some hold that they date from Henry I's reign, whether early or late in the reign,[50] but others feel that they were introduced by King William I (reigned 1066–1087).[20] The precursors of the records probably date to the Anglo-Saxon period, as the historian Pauline Stafford argues that financial records must have been kept in some form during the reigns of Cnut (reigned 1016–1035), Æthelred II (reigned 978–1016), and Edgar the Peaceable (reigned 959–975).[52] There is a reference to the king's "rolls" in a writ from 1110, which purports to be a grant from Henry I to the abbot of Westminster of ten shillings, but the writ may be a forgery, or parts of it may be genuine with some interpolations. The writ only exists in a copy in a later cartulary, and the Abbey of Westminster is also known to have forged a number of other writs or charters, so the writ is not a solid source for royal rolls being kept as early as 1110.[53]

After the one surviving roll from Henry I's reign, no further Pipe rolls survived from his reign, nor are any preserved from the reign of his successor, King Stephen (reigned 1135–1154). But by the second year of King Henry II's reign, or 1155, they once more survive.[4] It is unclear whether Pipe rolls were actually created during Stephen's reign and did not survive, or whether the conditions during Stephen's reign precluded the creation of Pipe rolls.[54][55] Continuously from the early years of King Henry II's reign, most Pipe rolls survive, with only a break in the last years of King John's reign (reigned 1199–1216).[56][e]

The surviving Pipe roll from 1130 records an income of £24,500.[37] This figure is dwarfed by the amount recorded on the Pipe roll that was actually owed to the king, which totals £68,850.[57] The income that they record in the early years of Henry II is much smaller than that of the one surviving year for Henry I. Those early Pipe rolls of Henry I record an income about £10,000 to £15,000. By the end of Henry II's reign, royal income recorded in the Pipe rolls had risen to £20,000. The end of John's reign saw a recorded income of about £30,000, but Henry III's reign recorded only £8,000 in the early years, rising to £16,500 by 1225.[58] Not only do the rolls from the early years of Henry II's reign show less income reaching the Exchequer than during Henry I's reign, those early rolls were haphazard and not as accurate and detailed as rolls dating from the later part of the reign. Nor are they as carefully produced as either the later rolls or the roll of 1130.[59]

By the time of King John, the Pipe rolls were growing unwieldy, as too many fines and fees were being recorded, making the finding of information in the rolls difficult. Eventually, after some experimentation, by 1206 a system was settled on whereby the actual detailed receipts were recorded in a set of receipt rolls and only aggregates were entered in the Pipe rolls.[60] A further reform in 1236 resulted in debts being recorded in separate Estreat rolls, and only the totals entered into the Pipe rolls.[61] In 1284 the Statutes of Rhuddlan were issued, which further reformed the accounting systems, and further reduced the detail contained on the Pipe rolls.[62] At this time, a large number of unrecoverable debts were also removed from the rolls, a process that had also been attempted in 1270. The attempt in 1270 had marked old debts with a "d" and stipulated that they were not to be re-entered into future Pipe rolls unless they were paid off. But this had not worked, and so in 1284 old debts were to be recorded on a separate roll. The statutes in 1284 also laid out a procedure where debtors whose documentation of payment of debt that hadn't been accepted in the past would have that documentation accepted, thus helping to clear out some of the backlogged debts on the books.[63]

Yet more extraneous details were removed from the Pipe rolls under the Cowick Ordinance of June 1323,[64] along with further ordinances in 1324 and 1326, all of which were done during the time that Walter de Stapledon held the office of Treasurer.[65] Prior to this reform the rolls had become clogged with debts, and clauses 2 through 8 of the Cowick Ordinance attempted to return the rolls to an exposition of accounts.[66] Another attempted reform at this time was the removal of customs receipts, as well as military accounts, from the rolls.[67] New offices in the Exchequer were also created, in an attempt to speed up the auditing process and lessen the time it took to prepare the Pipe rolls and other financial records.[68] The attempt to remove non-Exchequer accounts did completely remove those types of records from the Pipe rolls; further reforms in 1368 created a set of foreign rolls, and all extraneous records in the Pipe rolls were transferred to those rolls.[67]

In 1462, the Exchequer was told to no longer summon for audit any farms or feefarms worth over 40 shillings per year, as these would be supervised by a newly appointed board of receivers or approvers.[69]

The Pipe rolls series ended in 1834 when the office that was in charge of their creation, the Pipe Office, was abolished.[70]

Creation

[edit]

They were created by taking the shire, or other governmental districts, accounts and writing them on two strips of parchment, usually about 14 inches (36 cm) wide.[4] The two pieces were then attached end to end to form one long sheet. Then, the various sheets from all the shires were piled together and affixed together at the top, and the resulting document would be rolled into a tight roll resembling a pipe.[3] They were not formed into one long continuous roll, as the Patent Rolls were, however. The sheets for each county have a heading at the top giving the name of the county the account is for, in Latin. If more than one sheet was required for a county, the county name would be amended on secondary sheets to indicate the order the sheets were in.[71]

Sometimes they are referred to, in Latin, as magnus rotulus pipae.[72] Several sources for the actual idea of making the rolls as rolls have been suggested, including Jews, Adelard of Bath, who was a royal clerk and was familiar with Arabic practices of using rolls, or the royal clerk Thurkil, who studied under a mathematician who may have been from Sicily.[73]

The rolls were written in Latin until 1733, except for a short time around 1650.[74] During the reign of Henry II, a duplicate copy of the year's Pipe roll was made for the Chancellor, and was called the Chancellor's roll. This was created at the same time as the regular Pipe roll, and was written by a clerk of the Chancellor.[75] The Chancellor rolls survive from 1163 to 1832, but are basically duplicates of the corresponding Pipe rolls, except for the occasional addition of a private charter or other material.[76]

Influence on other records

[edit]

The example of the royal Exchequer's records eventually influenced others to keep similar records. The earliest surviving non-royal Pipe rolls are those of the Bishop of Winchester, which are extant from 1208,[77] and form a continuous series from that date. They started under Peter des Roches, who was also a royal clerk and administrator.[78] They record monies coming in as well as expenses and payments made, in detail, but like the royal records, they do not show profits or losses as a sum total. Most private rolls resembling the Pipe rolls are from monasteries. The household rolls, which closely resemble the Pipe rolls, for Eleanor of England, wife of Simon de Montfort, survive for part of the year 1265.[77]

Studies by historians

[edit]

A number of historians have studied the surviving Pipe rolls, using them as the basis for the study of financial and governmental history, especially of the medieval era.[79][80][81] A study from 1925 compiled the royal income that passed through the Exchequer for each year of Henry II and Richard I, as well as a sample of some years from John's reign, attempting to compare how the royal revenues compared in the various reigns.[82] Recent work by Nick Barratt on the reigns of Richard and John have updated the earlier research.[83][84] Historian David Carpenter has carried out further studies on the early years of King Henry III's reign.[82] The Pipe rolls have also been used to identify royal officials, especially those that were involved in local government and were not high-ranking.[85] Because they recorded judicial fines, the Pipe rolls also can be used to shed light on how the judicial system in medieval England worked, as well as identifying royal judges.[86][87] Although they don't provide exact revenue figures, most historians believe they represent a close approximation of revenue, and can be used to gain a general understanding of how much financial resources the English kings had available in the Middle Ages.[88]

The lone surviving Pipe roll from Henry I's reign, that of 1130, has been a popular subject of study. Recent investigations include Judith Green's search for evidence of Henry's financial system. Another historian, Stephanie Mooers Christelow, has studied the roll along with those from the reign of Henry II, looking for the exemptions and grants made by both kings to various royal favourites.[79] Christelow has also studied the 1130 roll to see what light it can shine on Henry I's judicial system, as well as on the growth of royal courts during Henry's reign.[80] The historian C. Warren Hollister used the 1130 Pipe roll to study the rewards of royal service during Henry's reign.[81]

The Pipe rolls from the 13th century onwards are less important for historical study because there are other surviving financial records. Some, such as the receipt rolls, were also kept by the Exchequer, and were used by the treasury clerks to prepare the Pipe rolls. Other surviving records were kept by the sheriffs for their own use in submitting accounts to the Pipe rolls.[89] However, the post 13th-century Pipe rolls are occasionally the sole source for historical facts such as William Shakespeare's residence in the parish of St Helen's Bishopsgate and in Southwark.[90]

Publication

[edit]
Extract from the Pipe roll for 21 Henry II (1174–5), as published by the Pipe Roll Society in 1897 using record type

The earliest Pipe rolls were published by the Record Commission in 1833 (the isolated roll of 1130) and the Public Record Office in 1844 (the rolls for 1155–58).[76] The Commission's edition of the 1130 roll has now been superseded by a new edition (with English translation) published by the Pipe Roll Society in 2012.[91]

In 1883 the Pipe Roll Society (a text publication society) was founded by the Public Record Office, on the initiative of Walford Dakin Selby and his colleague James Greenstreet, to establish a systematic publishing programme for the Pipe rolls.[74] It published its first volume in 1884, and has now published all the rolls from 1158 to 1224.[92][93] Besides the continuous series, it has also published the roll for 1230. The rolls for 1241 were published in 1918 by Yale University Press.[76] Various county record societies have published parts of the rolls for various years that relate to their particular county. The Society's earliest volumes (to 1900) were printed in "record type", designed to produce a near-facsimile of the original manuscript, including its scribal abbreviations. This policy was abandoned in 1903, and all volumes since have been published in normal type with abbreviations extended.[94]

The Pipe Roll Society has also published numerous related texts, including the Chancellor's Roll for 1196 and the Norman Pipe Rolls of Henry II.[92][93] Rolls for the Irish Exchequer and the Norman Exchequer have also been published.[95]

Notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Brown Governance pp. 54–56
  2. ^ a b c d Chrimes Administrative History pp. 62–63
  3. ^ a b c Coredon Dictionary of Medieval Terms p. 219
  4. ^ a b c d e Lyon Constitutional and Legal History pp. 112–113
  5. ^ a b Warren Governance pp. 73–74
  6. ^ Richardson and Sayles Governance pp. 216–217
  7. ^ Warren Governance pp. 76–77
  8. ^ Bartlett England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings p. 198
  9. ^ Lyon Constitutional and Legal History p. 262
  10. ^ a b Hollister Henry I p. 26
  11. ^ Chibnall Anglo-Norman England p. 126
  12. ^ Clanchy Memory to Written Record p. 136
  13. ^ Clanchy Memory to Written Record p. 141
  14. ^ Mason "Administration and Government" Companion to the Anglo-Norman World p. 139
  15. ^ Mason "Administration and Government" Companion to the Anglo-Norman World p. 150
  16. ^ Lyon Constitutional and Legal History pp. 220–221
  17. ^ Frame Political Development p. 87
  18. ^ a b Chrimes Administrative History p. 60
  19. ^ Clanchy From Memory to Written Record p. 136
  20. ^ a b Clanchy From Memory to Written Record p. 151
  21. ^ Lyon Constitutional and Legal History p. 164
  22. ^ Loyn (ed.) Middle Ages p. 266
  23. ^ Lyon Constitutional and Legal History p. 163
  24. ^ Warren Governance p. 68
  25. ^ a b Warren Governance p. 146
  26. ^ Warren Governance p. 111
  27. ^ Coredon Dictionary of Medieval Terms p. 23
  28. ^ Hollister "Significance of Scutage Rates" English Historical Review, p. 578
  29. ^ Coredon Dictionary p. 252
  30. ^ Hollister "1066" American Historical Review p. 717
  31. ^ Hollister "Irony of English Feudalism" Journal of British Studies, p. 9
  32. ^ Mortimer Angevin England p. 42
  33. ^ Bartlett England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings p. 164
  34. ^ Coredon Dictionary of Medieval Terms pp. 237–238
  35. ^ Bartlett England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings p. 170
  36. ^ a b Bartlett England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings pp. 239–240
  37. ^ a b Bartlett England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings p. 159
  38. ^ Bartlett England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings p. 133
  39. ^ Bartlett, England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings, pp. 171–174
  40. ^ Huscroft, Ruling England, p. 159
  41. ^ Bartlett, England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings, p. 254
  42. ^ Bartlett, England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings, p. 373
  43. ^ Heiser "Castles, Constables and Politics" Albion p. 20 footnote 8
  44. ^ Heiser "Castles, Constables and Politics" Albion p. 22 footnote 22
  45. ^ Heiser "Castles, Constables and Politics" Albion p. 32
  46. ^ Alexander "New Evidence" English Historical Review p. 719
  47. ^ Alexander "New Evidence" English Historical Review p. 724 and footnote 2
  48. ^ Barratt "English Revenue of Richard I" English Historical Review p. 636
  49. ^ a b Barratt "Revenue of King John" English Historical Review p. 836 footnote 1
  50. ^ a b Chrimes Administrative History pp. 30–31
  51. ^ a b Hagger "Pipe Roll for 25 Henry I" English Historical Review
  52. ^ Stafford Unification and Conquest p. 149
  53. ^ Clanchy From Memory to Written Record pp. 137–138
  54. ^ Richardson and Sayles Governance p. 257 footnote 5
  55. ^ Yoshitake "Exchequer in the Reign of Stephen" English Historical Review pp. 950–959
  56. ^ Mortimer Angevin England pp. 66–68
  57. ^ Huscroft Ruling England p. 102
  58. ^ Mortimer Angevin England p. 51
  59. ^ Richardson and Sayles Governance p. 260
  60. ^ Chrimes Administrative History pp. 73–74
  61. ^ Chrimes Administrative History p. 119
  62. ^ Chrimes Administrative History p. 148
  63. ^ Prestwich Edward I pp. 242–243
  64. ^ Chrimes Administrative History p. 181
  65. ^ Prestwich Plantagenet England p. 59
  66. ^ Buck "Reform of the Exchequer" English Historical Review, p. 246
  67. ^ a b Graves Bibliography of English History p. 473
  68. ^ Prestwich Plantagenet England p. 208
  69. ^ Wolfee "Management of English Royal Estates" English Historical Review p. 2
  70. ^ "Pipe rolls entry Archived 31 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine" Websters Online Dictionary
  71. ^ Ramsay "Origin of the Name Pipe Roll" English Historical Review pp. 329–220
  72. ^ Chrimes Administrative History p. 50
  73. ^ Clanchy From Memory to Written Record, p. 140
  74. ^ a b National Archives Research Guides: Early Pipe Rolls, 1130–c. 1300
  75. ^ Lyon Constitutional and Legal History p. 261
  76. ^ a b c Graves Bibliography of English History p. 474
  77. ^ a b Clanchy Memory to Written Record pp. 92–93
  78. ^ Bartlett England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings p. 201
  79. ^ a b Mason "Administration and Government" Companion to the Anglo-Norman World pp. 148–149
  80. ^ a b Mason "Administration and Government" Companion to the Anglo-Norman World p. 157
  81. ^ a b Mason "Administration and Government" Companion to the Anglo-Norman World p. 162
  82. ^ a b Bartlett England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings pp. 175–176
  83. ^ Barratt "English Revenue of Richard I" English Historical Review pp. 835–856
  84. ^ Barratt "Revenue of King John" English Historical Review pp. 835–855
  85. ^ Huscroft Ruling England pp. 88–89
  86. ^ Lyon Constitutional and Legal History p. 191
  87. ^ Richardson and Sayles Governance pp. 176–177
  88. ^ Barratt "Revenue of King John" English Historical Review pp. 836–837
  89. ^ Lyon Constitutional and Legal History pp. 330–331
  90. ^ Hales "London Residences of Shakespeare" Athenaeum pp. 401-402
  91. ^ Green Great Roll of the Pipe
  92. ^ a b Pipe Roll Society "Pipe Roll Society Publications"
  93. ^ a b Royal Historical Society "Pipe Roll Society Publications"
  94. ^ Pipe Roll Society Great Roll of the Pipe pp. vii-viii
  95. ^ Graves Bibliography of English History pp. 475–477

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pipe rolls

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The pipe rolls, formally known as the Great Rolls of the Pipe, are the annual financial records maintained by the English , capturing the audit of sheriffs' accounts for the Crown's revenues and expenditures in each financial year, and constituting the oldest continuous series of surviving in from 1130. These documents, written in Latin on sewn sheets of sheepskin parchment and rolled into cylindrical shapes resembling pipes—thus earning their colloquial name—detail county-by-county accounts of fixed revenues such as land farms, feudal aids, taxes, judicial amercements, and miscellaneous incomes, alongside allowances for royal disbursements like wages and alms. Originating during the reign of Henry I and preserved nearly unbroken from 1155 to 1833, the pipe rolls offer primary evidence of medieval governmental administration, economic conditions, , and the fiscal machinery of the , serving as a foundational resource for historians despite their focus primarily on outstanding debts rather than comprehensive cash flows. The Pipe Roll Society, established in the late , has transcribed and published the earliest rolls up to 1224, enhancing accessibility for scholarly analysis.

Origins and Early Development

Inception under Henry I

The pipe roll system originated during the reign of King Henry I (r. 1100–1135) as a mechanism for systematically auditing and recording royal revenues, reflecting the crown's drive for centralized fiscal control amid expanding administrative demands. The earliest surviving pipe roll, dated to the financial year 1129–1130 (31 Henry I), documents the Exchequer's examination of accounts rendered by sheriffs across English counties, detailing payments, arrears, and debts owed to the king from sources such as farms, pleas, and customary dues. This roll, compiled following the audit, exemplifies the routine process of holding local officials accountable for revenues collected on the king's behalf, with entries structured by county to facilitate precise tracking of fiscal obligations. This innovation built directly on post-Domesday administrative precedents, where the 1086 survey under William I had established a framework for assessing land-based liabilities like the , but lacked ongoing mechanisms; Henry I's reforms institutionalized annual accountability to prevent leakage and enhance predictability in royal , which derived substantially from lands and judicial fines. The , formalized as a distinct agency early in Henry I's reign, conducted these audits biannually—at for preliminary reviews and for final tallies—centralizing operations initially in to leverage proximity to the and royal archives. Evidence from contemporary charters and later recollections, such as those in the Dialogus de Scaccario, underscores how this system prioritized empirical verification of cash flows over feudal , marking a causal shift toward bureaucratic in Norman governance. While the 1129–1130 roll is the oldest extant, manuscript references suggest pipe rolls predated it within Henry I's administration, implying the practice's inception around the 1110s or earlier to support his campaigns and courtly expenditures; however, survival biases limit confirmation, with the system's continuity affirmed by its role in sustaining royal liquidity without reliance on tallies. This foundational approach ensured sheriffs faced structured interrogations by barons of the , using counters and tallies for verification, thereby embedding causal accountability into fiscal practice and laying groundwork for enduring public record-keeping.

Survival through the Anarchy and Expansion under Henry II

The production of pipe rolls appears to have lapsed during the civil war known as under King (1135–1154), as no examples survive from this era, likely due to the breakdown of central fiscal administration amid widespread baronial revolts and territorial fragmentation. This discontinuity followed the single surviving roll from Henry I's reign (1129–1130), underscoring the vulnerability of the system to political instability, though the underlying bureaucratic mechanisms endured sufficiently to enable rapid resumption. Upon Henry II's accession in 1154, pipe rolls recommenced without interruption, with the first complete series beginning for the financial year 1155–1156, signaling the resilience of the exchequer's and personnel inherited from prior Norman kings. The initial rolls under Henry II, such as those for 1155–1158, reveal extensive "waste" entries—denoting lands rendered unproductive by Anarchy-era devastation and unable to yield revenue—across numerous counties, with sheriffs accounting for diminished farms and feudal dues reflective of economic disruption rather than mere administrative notation. These records facilitated the restoration of royal oversight by documenting arrears and enforcing accountability on local officials, thereby aiding Henry II's efforts to reassert centralized control over fragmented estates and baronial holdings. Henry II's administrative reforms further institutionalized and expanded the pipe rolls, standardizing their format and scope to capture a broader array of fiscal obligations, including heightened scrutiny of feudal incidents such as reliefs, wardships, and marriages, which were rigorously enforced to maximize crown income from tenants-in-chief. Scutage, a commutation of knight-service into cash payments, emerged prominently in the rolls from 1156 onward, funding campaigns like the 1159 expedition to Toulouse and marking a shift toward monetized feudal liabilities that bolstered royal liquidity. By the 1160s, following the 1166 assize of arms and introduction of general eyres, the rolls grew in detail and volume, incorporating judicial fines and itinerant justices' audits, which contributed to revenue recovery from early lows—evidenced by fragmented collections in the 1150s—to more systematic coverage and increased yields by the decade's end, underpinning the king's military and administrative resurgence. This evolution transformed the rolls from sporadic audits into a robust tool for fiscal surveillance, evidencing causal links between bureaucratic continuity, legal enforcement, and the reconsolidation of Angevin authority.

Physical Composition and Creation

Format and Materials

Pipe rolls were constructed from multiple rotuli, each consisting of two rectangular membranes of sheepskin sewn together head to tail to form a single sheet approximately 400 mm wide. These rotuli were then sewn end to end at the head to create an elongated roll, which was stored in a tightly rolled cylindrical form, giving rise to the name "pipe rolls." The , derived from high-quality , provided inherent durability against degradation, enhanced by secure storage in the . Entries were inscribed in abbreviated on both sides of the membranes, with county-specific accounts organized sequentially by the order of sheriff presentations, each section headed by the county name in Latin. This standardized physical and scribal format facilitated efficient compilation and reference during sessions, while the robust materials ensured legibility and structural integrity over centuries, enabling the survival of annual rolls from 1130 and a continuous series from the mid-12th century onward.

Annual Auditing Process at the Exchequer

The Exchequer convened biannually during the Easter term, shortly after Easter Sunday in late April or early May, and the Michaelmas term, following 29 September, to audit the accounts of county sheriffs for revenues due to the Crown. These sessions focused on verifying collections from fixed county farms—a standardized annual payment representing feudal renders, rents, and customary dues—as well as variable income from judicial amercements, escheats, and other incidents. Sheriffs were summoned in advance by royal writs specifying alleged debts, compelling their personal attendance at Westminster with any payments or supporting tallies. Failure to appear or settle accounts resulted in notations of default, escalating to distraints on lands or goods in subsequent audits. During the audit, sheriffs rendered accounts orally before the barons of the , seated on raised benches, while the chancellor's clerk interrogated them on specific items such as prior-year debts, allowed expenditures backed by writs, and new oblations. Calculations proceeded on the exchequer cloth—a striped surface resembling a —where officials placed counters (small disks or s) in columns to represent pounds, shillings, and pence, deducting allowances and verifying totals against presented tallies, which were notched wooden sticks serving as receipts for treasury deposits. Payments could be in , tallies, or quittances authorized by writs, with assays ensuring purity by blanching (deducting value). This empirical method prioritized verifiable receipts over self-reported figures, cross-checking against summons writs and prior pipe rolls to detect discrepancies. The pipe roll emerged as the final record of these proceedings, compiled primarily at the session to cover the full , with the treasurer dictating entries to scribes who inscribed them in abbreviated Latin on membranes sewn head-to-tail. Each 's account listed the sheriff's debet (total owed, opening with the farm), followed by itemized solutions (payments or allowances), concluding with "et quietus est" if fully discharged or "et debet" for remaining balances carried forward. Duplicate rolls were produced—one for the (E 372) and a counter-roll for the lower (E 352)—compared for accuracy, with dockets on the dorse summarizing contents for reference. This structure enforced fiscal discipline by publicizing unresolved debts, incentivizing sheriffs to prioritize collections amid feudal obligations. By the late , preliminary county membranes and originalia rolls (E 371) supplemented the process, streamlining verification but maintaining the oral audit's centrality.

Content and Recorded Data

Financial Accounts by County

The financial accounts in the pipe rolls were structured by county, with each required to account for revenues owed to from royal demesnes, feudal obligations, and other fixed or variable sources within their jurisdiction. These accounts commenced with the corpus comitatus, the fixed county farm representing the baseline annual payment derived from royal lands, rents, and customary dues, which sheriffs were expected to deliver in full or explain shortfalls for. By the 1150s, under Henry II, these farms had stabilized as unchanging sums for most English counties, reflecting a shift from variable collections to predictable fiscal benchmarks, though occasional incrementa—additions for or enhanced yields—were appended to certain farms to capture surplus revenues. Specific examples illustrate the scale: the joint farm for Essex and Hertfordshire stood at £160 2s 4d (blanc) in 12th-century rolls, encompassing allocations from manors, hundreds, and boroughs remitted to the Exchequer. Yorkshire's farm, among the largest due to its extensive royal holdings, was assessed at substantial fixed levels similarly derived from demesne incomes, while smaller counties like Rutland yielded proportionally lesser amounts, often under £100 annually. Following the main farm, subsidiary fixed renders were itemized, including payments from royal woods, fisheries, and borough farms—such as urban tolls or market dues—treated as appendages to the county total. Variable fiscal entries supplemented the fixed farms, notably (shield money), levied as a commutation for obligations at rates like 2 marks per knight's fee during campaigns, collected county-wide and accounted per fee-holder. Feudal aids, irregular but standardized impositions for royal events like the knighting of the king's eldest son or eldest daughter's marriage, were similarly aggregated by county, with sheriffs tallying contributions from tenants-in-chief and sub-tenants. Customary renders, such as payments or allocations from demesnes, appeared as routine debits, often deducted from the farm before final tallage. These patterns yielded empirical upticks under Henry II's reforms, with scutage and aids contributing spikes tied to military needs, as seen in quinquennial tallies from 1157 onward exceeding baseline farms by thousands of pounds across counties. By the late , the framework extended to Norman counties and, from century, select Welsh shires like Flint, mirroring English structures with adapted farms from conquered territories, though Irish accounts remained sporadic until later enrollments. Shortfalls in farms were offset by these variables or carried as debts (debita), with sheriffs owing balances across years, underscoring the rolls' in enforcing fiscal accountability.

Judicial Fines and Administrative Entries

Pipe rolls document judicial fines primarily through amercements, which were monetary penalties imposed by royal courts for offenses ranging from breaches of to customary defaults in service. These entries detail the sums owed by individuals or communities, audited annually by sheriffs before the barons. For instance, the pipe roll for the 31st year of Henry I (1130) records judicial fines separately from fixed revenues, highlighting their role as variable income sources. Under Henry II, reforms including the (1166) and (1176) expanded itinerant justices' eyres, leading to a marked increase in recorded amercements during the 1170s. Pipe rolls from this period, such as those for 1177-1180, capture fines from general eyres alongside specialized forest pleas, where offenders paid for violations of royal laws preserved since the . Specific examples include the of Warwick's account of 16 shillings for forest pleas in one roll, illustrating localized enforcement. Administrative entries in pipe rolls encompass escheats, where lands escheated to due to tenant deaths without or felonies, with sheriffs rendering accounts of issues from such properties. Vacancies in bishoprics or abbacies prompted royal seizure of temporalities, noted in rolls with details of farms collected during custodianships, as seen in recurring debts for diocesan revenues. Wards of underage similarly generated entries for custodies granted to royal officials, tracking profits from inherited estates until majority. These non-fiscal notations often reference estreats—extracts from proceedings—linking pipe roll debts to outcomes in plea rolls or fine rolls, thereby tracing causal paths from judicial verdicts to enforcement. Such cross-references underscore the rolls' function in monitoring compliance, with unpaid persisting across multiple annual audits until resolution or pardon.

Preservation, Publication, and Modern Access

Historical Storage and Survival Rates

The pipe rolls of the English were stored rolled in protective cylindrical containers known as , housed within the at Westminster, where the conducted its audits. This archival method, involving durable membranes sewn together and encased for long-term retention, facilitated repeated consultation for recovery across administrations, thereby incentivizing careful preservation. The rolls' utility in verifying historical fiscal obligations—such as sheriffs' spanning decades—imposed a practical imperative on clerks to maintain integrity against decay or neglect, contributing to empirical patterns of continuity observed in the surviving corpus. The central series of royal pipe rolls demonstrates exceptional survival, forming a nearly unbroken sequence from 1155, the second year of Henry II's reign, through 1832, encompassing over 670 annual rolls with only four documented losses. This high retention rate persisted through the medieval period, including the years 1155 to 1289 under Henry II, Richard I, John, and the early Plantagenets, where institutional routines at Westminster prioritized archival access over discard. The core collection, now held by The National Archives (successor to the ), reflects causal factors like centralized storage and administrative reuse, which mitigated risks from dispersed handling or incidental damage, unlike more fragmented contemporary records. Supplementary episcopal pipe rolls, modeled on practices, further illustrate variable but robust preservation in contexts; the Bishopric of Winchester's accounts survive continuously from 1208/09 to 1454/55, with the series extending nearly unbroken to 1710/11. These 191 early rolls, audited for the bishop's extensive estates, were similarly stored as sewn membranes, underscoring parallel mechanisms of fiscal accountability that enhanced longevity beyond royal dependencies. Overall, the rolls' endurance—despite potential disruptions from conflicts like or later civil wars—stems from their role in iterative auditing, where loss of precedents would impair revenue enforcement, rather than mere custodial luck.

Printed Editions and Digital Projects

The Pipe Roll Society, founded in 1883, began publishing transcribed editions of the Great Rolls of the Pipe in 1884, starting with the roll for the fifth year of Henry II's reign (1158–1159). These volumes provide full texts of the original Latin records, accompanied by English translations in select cases and calendared indices of names, places, and subjects to aid navigation. By prioritizing rolls from the reigns of Henry II and Henry III, the society's efforts have made available over 100 volumes, focusing on the core financial audits while preserving the rolls' dialogic structure between sheriffs and the . Regional transcription projects have supplemented these national editions, such as the Pipe Roll Project, which extracts and transcribes Kent-specific entries from early rolls dating to 1130. Initiated to highlight local fiscal details like accounts and feudal debts, this ongoing initiative produces detailed summaries and full transcriptions, enabling targeted study of county-level revenue patterns without requiring access to the full national series. Digitization efforts by The National Archives since the early 2000s have extended access through online catalogs and partnered image repositories, including the Anglo-American Legal Tradition project, which hosts digital copies of select pipe rolls. These scans, derived from microfilm and direct , allow of membrane details such as variations and erasures, supporting verification against printed editions. Enhanced online indexing facilitates cross-referencing across rolls, as demonstrated in post-2010 studies aggregating totals for longitudinal fiscal trends.

Scholarly Interpretations and Significance

Economic and Fiscal Insights

The pipe rolls reveal patterns of royal fiscal capacity through annual revenue tallies, primarily from county farms, feudal incidents, and judicial amercements. For the year ending Michaelmas 1130, Henry I's surviving pipe roll records a total demanded income of £26,480, comprising £9,526 from lands and associated profits (36%), £5,424 from pleas (20%), and the balance from miscellaneous sources like customs and gifts. Under Henry II from 1155 onward, ordinary revenues averaged £21,000 annually, rising to peaks of £30,000 by the 1190s amid territorial expansions and intensified exploitation, underscoring how Exchequer auditing enforced accountability and sustained crown finances amid feudal fragmentation. These figures, derived from sheriffs' county-by-county accounts, highlight causal links between centralized revenue mechanisms and economic resilience, as consistent collections funded military campaigns and administrative reforms without reliance on ad hoc tallages. Entries on demesne management document a transition from leasing royal manors to direct exploitation between the mid-12th and mid-13th centuries, with sheriffs increasingly for surpluses from , , and sales rather than fixed rents. This shift, evident in rolls from the 1160s onward, reflects lords' responses to market incentives and labor availability, boosting cash flows to the —for instance, enhanced yields from demesne arable in counties like and contributed to revenue upticks post-1180. Concurrently, "waste" notations in early Henry II rolls quantify agrarian disruptions from (1135–1153), with allowances for uncultivated lands reaching 30–50% in affected shires such as and by 1156, signaling war-induced depopulation and exhaustion before gradual recovery through repopulation and by the 1170s. Scholars critique the rolls' emphasis on monetized debts, which undervalues non-cash renders like in-kind payments of produce or labor services that comprised up to 40% of manorial output, potentially distorting aggregates of economic activity. Recent quantitative analyses, including a 2025 study of Henry I's roll, trace continuities in hidage and carucage assessments back to valuations of 1086, affirming long-term fiscal structures that prioritized arable productivity over pastoral diversification. These insights, cross-verified against inquisitions and charters, affirm pipe rolls' utility in modeling medieval fiscal elasticity despite gaps in peripheral economies.

Social Hierarchies and Judicial Functions

The pipe rolls document feudal hierarchies through entries detailing knight's fees, the basic units of military , where overlords accounted for payments in lieu of service, often revealing as under-tenants were listed separately or paid portions directly to . For instance, in the pipe rolls of Henry II (1154–1189), county sections enumerate fees held by barons, with arrears indicating tensions in the chain of obligation, as powerful tenants evaded full payments through local influence or . Sheriff entries for county farms frequently show persistent debts, reflecting power dynamics where royal agents struggled against entrenched local elites who manipulated collections or withheld revenues, as seen in recurring shortfalls under Henry I's successors that persisted into the despite central audits. Judicial functions emerge in the rolls' records of amercements—fines imposed by royal justices during eyres (itinerant circuits)—which curbed feudal lords' private jurisdictions by channeling penalties to , thus enforcing centralized law over local customs. Under Henry II, post-1173 revolt pipe rolls, such as that for 1184–1185, list heavy amercements on earls and barons for or non-compliance, totaling thousands of marks and demonstrating royal justices' role in reasserting authority after baronial unrest. These fines, categorized under "de placitis coronae" (crown pleas), reveal crime patterns like forest trespasses or assaults, with higher incidences in contested border counties, underscoring causal mechanisms where royal circuits disrupted seigneurial impunity and generated revenue from abuses previously internalized within manorial courts. In the 13th century, particularly under King John (1199–1216) and Henry III (1216–1272), pipe rolls evidence evolving through transaction records of purchasable exemptions, such as fines for quittance from or jury duties, allowing lesser landholders to sidestep feudal burdens amid fiscal pressures. For example, East Anglian entries from John's reign show sub-tenants fining 10–50 marks on portions of knight's fees to secure relief from , enabling accumulation of liquid wealth over hereditary service and highlighting how audits facilitated upward shifts for administratively adept families, though often at the cost of accruing crown debts that tested loyalties. This pattern, grounded in verifiable fine tallies rather than narrative chronicles, underscores a pragmatic erosion of rigid hierarchies driven by monetary incentives over birthright.

Methodological Limitations and Debates

The pipe rolls exhibit inconsistencies in their coverage of financial years, nominally spanning from (29 ) to the following , but frequently incorporating from prior periods or incomplete audits, which hinders precise chronological reconstructions of flows. Sheriffs, responsible for accounts, often underreported collectible sums by pleading shortfalls excused as (Latin vastum), a term denoting lands or revenues deemed irrecoverable, thereby potentially masking fiscal evasion or administrative laxity under pressure from barons to balance ledgers. Interpretations of entries remain contested, with traditional scholarship viewing them as indicators of physical devastation—such as war damage or economic disruption rendering lands unproductive—while alternative readings treat primarily as an accounting mechanism for uncollected taxes, raising questions of whether sheriffs exploited it for personal gain or legitimate relief amid genuine hardships like the post-Anarchy recovery of 1153–1154. Empirical scrutiny favors the devastation hypothesis in early rolls under Henry II (1154–1189), as cross-referenced with charter evidence showing correlated land grants and recoveries, though causal attribution to evasion persists in cases of repeated claims without corroborating destruction records. Coverage of ecclesiastical lands is empirically incomplete, as pipe rolls prioritize royal demesne farms, scutages, and secular debts, often noting church exemptions (e.g., frankalmoin tenures immune from certain aids) but omitting internal monastic economies or tithes not accruing to , thus underrepresenting total agrarian output. From the exchequer's standpoint, entries systematically emphasize outstanding obligations over disbursements or allowances, introducing a toward inflating perceived fiscal burdens on debtors while downplaying systemic exemptions or writ-based quittances that reduced actual collections. Contemporary debates center on quantitative versus qualitative applications, with aggregate revenue tallies from rolls enabling macroeconomic estimates (e.g., Henry I's circa 1130 roll yielding £22,000–£25,000 annually) but limited by lacunae in non-royal sectors, prompting caution against overreliance for GDP proxies amid unquantified or evasion. Qualitative analyses, conversely, highlight administrative protocols like iterative audits, countering narratives of an "oppressive state" derived from selective debt tallies; stable per-capita yields (e.g., 1–2 shillings per hide) across reigns suggest efficient extraction rather than exploitative excess, as evidenced by consistent farm revenues despite territorial flux. Such first-principles evaluation underscores the rolls' strength in tracing causal mechanisms of over inflated aggregate claims unsubstantiated by broader evidentiary contexts.

Influence and Legacy

Impact on Subsequent Administrative Records

The pipe rolls established an early precedent for the systematic enrollment of administrative and financial transactions in medieval , influencing the Chancery's development of close and patent rolls by the early . Beginning in 1199 under King John, these Chancery enrollments adopted a roll-based format for recording royal writs, grants, and correspondence, mirroring the 's practice of annual, membrane-sewn summaries of sheriffs' accounts while adapting it to head-to-foot sewing for efficiency. This integration reflected a broader causal evolution in record-keeping, where the pipe rolls' emphasis on verifiable debts and payments informed Chancery procedures for tracking obligations like nova oblata (new offerings), derived from fine rolls and originalia rolls transferred to the Exchequer. Within the itself, and issue rolls under Henry III (r. 1216–1272) demonstrated direct continuity with pipe roll formats, recording treasury inflows and outflows in a structured, - or county-specific manner akin to the pipe rolls' summaries. These rolls, commencing in the early 1220s—for instance, rolls for 1220–1222 and issue rolls for 1241–1242—echoed the pipe rolls' focus on empirical tracking of revenues and expenditures, stabilizing the annual financial process approximately 8–10 months after . Such records supplemented the pipe rolls by detailing actual cash movements rather than solely outstanding debts, enhancing fiscal transparency without altering the core enrollment methodology. Memoranda rolls further evolved as direct supplements to the pipe rolls, introducing procedural depth to audits from 1218 onward through the efforts of remembrancers. These rolls documented audit schedules for sheriffs, debt enforcement actions by county, and ancillary notes on obligations, building on the pipe rolls' debt-centric to address gaps in real-time administration. By the mid-13th century, this expansion allowed for more granular oversight, with entries cross-referencing pipe roll data to facilitate debt collection and procedural consistency, marking a refinement rather than replacement of the original system.

Role in Understanding Medieval Governance

The pipe rolls reveal the Exchequer's systematic annual audits of sheriffs' accounts, enforcing fiscal across counties and underscoring a level of bureaucratic precision that facilitated the Angevin monarchy's administrative reach from Henry II's reign onward, commencing with the continuous series in 1155–1156. This mechanism allowed to track revenues from diverse sources, including feudal incidents and judicial fines, enabling predictable resource mobilization that causal analysis links to territorial consolidation in , , and beyond. Evidentiary patterns in the rolls, such as disbursements for fortifications documented in the 1172–1173 roll, demonstrate direct ties between oversight and military preparedness, funding defenses critical to Angevin expansion against rivals like . Similarly, entries for levies like the 1165 Welsh campaign illustrate how audited revenues supported expeditionary forces, with sheriffs compelled to remit funds for royal armies rather than relying solely on ad hoc feudal summons. These records thus provide causal evidence that centralized fiscal extraction, rather than decentralized lordly obligations, underpinned the dynasty's ability to across multiple realms. Recurring sheriff debts, averaging substantial arrears across rolls like those under Henry II, expose feudal structures' limitations in revenue reliability, as crown demands via the consistently outpaced local capacities and compelled compensatory payments or land forfeitures. This pattern supports a realist interpretation prioritizing monarchical fiscal instruments—audits, scutages, and direct levies—over idealized narratives of consensual , revealing governance as a coercive hierarchy where central tools mitigated local inefficiencies. Twentieth- and twenty-first-century , drawing on pipe roll data, positions these mechanisms as precursors to sustained systems, with the Exchequer's protocols influencing later parliamentary oversight and state bureaucracies by establishing precedents for verifiable . Such analyses emphasize empirical continuity from medieval centralization to modern fiscal realism, cautioning against overreliance on fragmented feudal models in favor of evidence-based views of administrative evolution.

References

  1. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/medieval-financial-records-pipe-rolls-1130-1300/
  2. http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/guide/pip.shtml
  3. https://academic.oup.com/book/60014/chapter/513509897
  4. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585200802667147
  5. https://amesfoundation.law.harvard.edu/lhsemelh/materials/Exchequer.pdf
  6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20108207
  7. https://www.angevinempire.org/sources/norman-pipe-rolls
  8. https://piperollsociety.co.uk/full-list-of-publications
  9. https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/journal/133/kent-and-the-earlier-pipe-rolls-1130-to-1300-some-introductory-notes
  10. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2598295
  11. https://assets.cambridge.org/97813165/04390/excerpt/9781316504390_excerpt.pdf
  12. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781846155536-013/html
  13. http://conclarendon.blogspot.com/2014/06/the-great-scutage-of-toulouse-1159.html
  14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4048847
  15. https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C6749
  16. https://piperollsociety.co.uk/contents-and-use
  17. https://piperollsociety.co.uk/pipe-roll-terminology
  18. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/medieval/excheq.asp
  19. https://piperollsociety.co.uk/the-farm-and-terre-date
  20. https://piperollsociety.co.uk/increment-and-profit
  21. https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/40810/Harrison2023.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  22. http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/Details?uri=C6729
  23. https://deremilitari.org/2014/03/the-1165-levy-for-the-army-of-wales/
  24. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/71694/epub
  25. https://archive.org/download/introductiontost03pipe/introductiontost03pipe.pdf
  26. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781846155536-013/html?lang=en
  27. https://piperollsociety.co.uk/other-debts
  28. https://amesfoundation.law.harvard.edu/lhsemelh/materials/PipeRoll31H1_PRS78.pdf
  29. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/2933966/DX212510.pdf
  30. https://www.academia.edu/41189879/The_Rolls_Behind_the_Rolls_The_English_pipe_rolls_and_their_preliminary_documents
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337950038_The_Rolls_Behind_the_Rolls_The_English_Pipe_Rolls_and_Their_Preliminary_Documents
  32. https://researchdata.gla.ac.uk/1126/3/sources.pdf
  33. https://www.academia.edu/1008774/Recorda_splendidissima_the_use_of_pipe_rolls_in_the_thirteenth_century
  34. https://unesco.org.uk/our-sites/memory-of-the-world/winchester-pipe-rolls
  35. https://www.hants.gov.uk/librariesandarchives/archives/popular-records/pipe-rolls
  36. https://archive.org/details/piperollsociety04pipeuoft
  37. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/100323857
  38. https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/magazine/81/13-the-great-rolls-of-the-pipe-and-the-kent-pipe-roll-project
  39. https://durobrivis.net/kent/exchequer/exchequer-intro.pdf
  40. http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/sources/pipe.shtml
  41. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/31827608/2013_Fairbairn_Henry_0634342_ethesis.pdf
  42. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/albion/article/king-henry-ii-and-the-earls-the-pipe-roll-evidence/132429177A119A4A1559A2B04815B35D
  43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2593378
  44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3679129
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391962800_The_Significance_of_King_Henry_I%27s_Pipe_Roll
  46. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2025-07-02-author-william-conqueror-s-medieval-big-data-project-revealed
  47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/554370
  48. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/albion/article/subinfeudation-and-alienation-of-land-economic-development-and-the-wealth-of-nobles-on-the-honor-of-richmond-1066-to-c-1300/04607F5568D53F0923A2E8B26167AE23
  49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/570263
  50. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/general-eyres-1194-1348/
  51. https://perspectivia.net/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/pnet_derivate_00004594/gillingham_observations.pdf
  52. https://www.reading.ac.uk/gcms/-/media/project/functions/research/graduate-centre-for-medieval-studies/documents/rms198503-b-feeney-the-effects-of-king-johns-scutages-on-eastanglian-subjects.pdf
  53. https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/77239/1/Peake%252C%2520Joseph%252C%252014341967%252C%2520corrections.pdf
  54. https://www.reading.ac.uk/gcms/-/media/project/functions/research/graduate-centre-for-medieval-studies/documents/rms201301-t-moore-score-it-upon-my-taille.pdf?la=en&hash=D8ED27FA48050F63FD1790587D5943C9
  55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1850498
  56. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23606/revisions/w23606.rev0.pdf
  57. https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C6769
  58. http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/guide/sta.shtml
  59. https://www.emerald.com/aaaj/article/21/7/1052/1143/Internal-control-accountability-and-corporate
  60. https://reviews.history.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Reviews_in_History_-_The_Winchester_Pipe_Rolls_and_Medieval_English_Society_-_2005_02_01.pdf
  61. https://academic.oup.com/book/11024/chapter/159355022
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.