Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.



Wool is the textile fiber obtained from sheep and other mammals, especially goats, rabbits, and camelids.[1] The term may also refer to inorganic materials, such as mineral wool and glass wool, that have some properties similar to animal wool.
As an animal fiber, wool consists of protein together with a small percentage of lipids. This makes it chemically quite distinct from cotton and other plant fibers, which are mainly cellulose.[1]
Characteristics
[edit]Wool is produced by follicles which are small cells located in the skin. These follicles are located in the upper layer of the skin called the epidermis and push down into the second skin layer called the dermis as the wool fibers grow. Follicles can be classed as either primary or secondary follicles. Primary follicles produce three types of fiber: kemp, medullated fibers, and true wool fibers. Secondary follicles only produce true wool fibers. Medullated fibers share nearly identical characteristics to hair and are long but lack crimp and elasticity. Kemp fibers are very coarse and shed out.[2]

Wool's crimp refers to the strong natural wave present in each wool fiber as it is presented on the animal. Wool's crimp, and to a lesser degree scales, make it easier to spin the fleece by helping the individual fibers attach, so they stay together. Because of the crimp, wool fabrics have greater bulk than other textiles, and they hold air, which causes the fabric to retain heat. Wool has a high specific thermal resistance, so it impedes heat transfer in general. This effect has benefited desert peoples, as Bedouins and Tuaregs use wool clothes for insulation.
The felting of wool occurs upon hammering or other mechanical agitation as the microscopic barbs on the surface of wool fibers hook together. Felting generally comes under two main areas, dry felting and wet felting. Wet felting occurs when water and a lubricant (especially an alkali such as soap) are applied to the wool which is then agitated until the fibers mix and bond together. Temperature shock while damp or wet accentuates the felting process. Some natural felting can occur on the animal's back.
Wool has several qualities that distinguish it from hair or fur: it is crimped and elastic.[3]
The amount of crimp corresponds to the fineness of the wool fibers. A fine wool like Merino may have up to 40 crimps per centimetre (100 crimps per inch), while coarser wool like karakul may have less than one (one or two crimps per inch). In contrast, hair has little if any scale and no crimp, and little ability to bind into yarn. On sheep, the hair part of the fleece is called kemp. The relative amounts of kemp to wool vary from breed to breed and make some fleeces more desirable for spinning, felting, or carding into batts for quilts or other insulating products, including the famous tweed cloth of Scotland.
Wool fibers readily absorb moisture, but are not hollow. Wool can absorb almost one-third of its own weight in water.[4] Wool absorbs sound like many other fabrics. It is generally a creamy white color, although some breeds of sheep produce natural colors, such as black, brown, silver, and random mixes.
Wool ignites at a higher temperature than cotton and some synthetic fibers. It has a lower rate of flame spread, a lower rate of heat release, a lower heat of combustion, and does not melt or drip;[5] it forms a char that is insulating and self-extinguishing, and it contributes less to toxic gases and smoke than other flooring products when used in carpets.[6] Wool carpets are specified for high safety environments, such as trains and aircraft. Wool is usually specified for garments for firefighters, soldiers, and others in occupations where they are exposed to the likelihood of fire.[6]
Wool causes an allergic reaction in some people.[7]
Processing
[edit]Shearing
[edit]
Sheep shearing is the process in which a worker (a shearer) cuts off the woollen fleece of a sheep. After shearing, wool-classers separate the wool into four main categories:
- fleece (which makes up the vast bulk)
- broken
- bellies
- locks
The quality of fleeces is determined by a technique known as wool classing, whereby a qualified person, called a wool classer, groups wools of similar grading together to maximize the return for the farmer or sheep owner. In Australia, before being auctioned, all Merino fleece wool is objectively measured for average diameter (micron), yield (including the amount of vegetable matter), staple length, staple strength, and sometimes color and comfort factor.
Scouring
[edit]
Wool straight off a sheep is known as "raw wool", "greasy wool"[8] or "wool in the grease". This wool contains a high level of valuable lanolin, as well as the sheep's dead skin and sweat residue, and generally also contains pesticides and vegetable matter from the animal's environment. Before the wool can be used for commercial purposes, it must be scoured, a process of cleaning the greasy wool. Scouring may be as simple as a bath in warm water or as complicated as an industrial process using detergent and alkali in specialized equipment.[9] In north west England, special potash pits were constructed to produce potash used in the manufacture of a soft soap for scouring locally produced white wool.
Vegetable matter in commercial wool is often removed by chemical carbonization.[10] In less-processed wools, vegetable matter may be removed by hand and some of the lanolin left intact through the use of gentler detergents. This semigrease wool can be worked into yarn and knitted into particularly water-resistant mittens or sweaters, such as those of the Aran Island fishermen. Lanolin removed from wool is widely used in cosmetic products such as hand creams.
Fineness and yield
[edit]Raw wool has many impurities; vegetable matter, sand, dirt and yolk which is a mixture of suint (sweat), grease, urine stains and dung locks. The sheep's body yields many types of wool with differing strengths, thicknesses, length of staple and impurities. The raw wool (greasy) is processed into 'top'. 'Worsted top' requires strong straight and parallel fibres.
| Common name | Part of sheep | Style of wool |
|---|---|---|
| Fine | Shoulder | Fine, uniform and very dense |
| Near | Sides | Fine, uniform and strong |
| Downrights | Neck | Short and irregular, lower quality |
| Choice | Back | Shorter staple, open and less strong |
| Abb | Haunches | Longer, stronger staple |
| Seconds | Belly | Short, tender, matted and dirty |
| Top-not | Head | Stiff, very coarse, rough and kempy |
| Brokes | Forelegs | Short, irregular and faulty |
| Cowtail | Hindlegs | Very strong, coarse and hairy |
| Britch | Tail | Very coarse, kempy and dirty |
| Source:[11] | ||
The quality of wool is determined by its fiber diameter, crimp, yield, color, and staple strength. Fiber diameter is the single most important wool characteristic determining quality and price.
Merino wool is typically 90–115 mm (3.5–4.5 in) in length and is very fine (between 12 and 24 microns).[12] The finest and most valuable wool comes from Merino hoggets. Wool taken from sheep produced for meat is typically coarser, and has fibers 40–150 mm (1.5–6 in) in length. Damage or breaks in the wool can occur if the sheep is stressed while it is growing its fleece, resulting in a thin spot where the fleece is likely to break.[13]
Wool is also separated into grades based on the measurement of the wool's diameter in microns and also its style. These grades may vary depending on the breed or purpose of the wool. For example:
| Diameter in microns | Name |
|---|---|
| < 15.5 | Ultrafine Merino[8] |
| 15.6–18.5 | Superfine Merino |
| 18.6–20 | Fine Merino[8] |
| 20.1–23 | Medium Merino |
| > 23 | Strong Merino[8] |
| Breeds | Diameter |
|---|---|
| Comeback | 21–26 microns, white, 90–180 mm (3.5–7.1 in) long |
| Fine crossbred | 27–31 microns, Corriedales, etc. |
| Medium crossbred | 32–35 microns |
| Downs | 23–34 microns, typically lacks luster and brightness. Examples, Aussiedown, Dorset Horn, Suffolk, etc.[14] |
| Coarse crossbred | >36 microns |
| Carpet wools | 35–45 microns[8] |
Any wool finer than 25 microns can be used for garments, while coarser grades are used for outerwear or rugs. The finer the wool, the softer it is, while coarser grades are more durable and less prone to pilling.
The finest Australian and New Zealand Merino wools are known as 1PP, which is the industry benchmark of excellence for Merino wool 16.9 microns and finer. This style represents the top level of fineness, character, color, and style as determined on the basis of a series of parameters in accordance with the original dictates of British wool as applied by the Australian Wool Exchange (AWEX) Council. Only a few dozen of the millions of bales auctioned every year can be classified and marked 1PP.[15]
In the United States, three classifications of wool are named in the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939.[16] Wool is "the fiber from the fleece of the sheep or lamb or hair of the Angora or Cashmere goat (and may include the so-called specialty fibers from the hair of the camel, alpaca, llama, and vicuna) which has never been reclaimed from any woven or felted wool product".[16] "Virgin wool" and "new wool" are also used to refer to such never used wool. There are two categories of recycled wool (also called reclaimed or shoddy wool). "Reprocessed wool" identifies "wool which has been woven or felted into a wool product and subsequently reduced to a fibrous state without having been used by the ultimate consumer".[16] "Reused wool" refers to such wool that has been used by the ultimate consumer.[16]
History
[edit]
Wild sheep were more hairy than woolly. Although sheep were domesticated some 9,000 to 11,000 years ago, archaeological evidence from statuary found at sites in Iran suggests selection for woolly sheep may have begun around 6000 BC,[17][18] with the earliest known woven wool garments having only been dated to two to three thousand years later.[19] Woolly sheep were introduced into Europe from the Near East in the early part of the 4th millennium BC. The oldest known European wool textile, c. 1500 BC, was preserved in a Danish bog.[20] Prior to the invention of shears—probably in the Iron Age — wool was plucked out by hand or with bronze combs. In Roman times, wool, linen, and leather clothed the European population; cotton from India was a curiosity of which only naturalists had heard, and silks, imported along the Silk Road from China, were extravagant luxury-goods. Pliny the Elder records in his Natural History that the reputation for producing the finest wool was enjoyed by Tarentum, where selective breeding had produced sheep with superior fleeces, but which required special care.
In medieval times, as trade connections expanded, the Champagne fairs revolved around the production of wool cloth in small centers such as Provins. The network developed by the annual fairs meant that the woolens of Provins might find their way to Naples, Sicily, Cyprus, Mallorca, Spain, and even Constantinople.[21] The wool trade developed into serious undertaking, a generator of capital.[22] In the 13th century, the wool trade became the economic engine of the Low Countries and central Italy. By the end of the 14th century, Italy predominated.[21] The Florentine wool guild, Arte della Lana, sent imported English wool to the San Martino convent for processing. Italian wool from Abruzzo and Spanish merino wools were processed at Garbo workshops. Abruzzo wool had once been the most accessible for the Florentine guild, until improved relations with merchants in Iberia made merino wool more available. In the 15th century Pisa established a factory "which would export its cloths to the Crimea in exchange for Russian furs".[23] By the 16th century Italian wool exports to the Levant had declined, eventually replaced by silk production.[21][24]
The value of exports of English raw wool were rivaled only by the 15th-century sheepwalks of Castile and were a significant source of income to the English crown, which in 1275 had imposed an export tax on wool called the "Great Custom". The importance of wool to the English economy can be seen in the fact that since the 14th century, the presiding officer of the House of Lords has sat on the "Woolsack", a chair stuffed with wool.
Economies of scale were instituted in the Cistercian houses, which had accumulated great tracts of land during the 12th and early 13th centuries, when land prices were low and labor still scarce. Raw wool was baled and shipped from North Sea ports to the textile cities of Flanders, notably Ypres and Ghent, where it was dyed and worked up as cloth. At the time of the Black Death (1346-1353), English textile industries consumed about 10% of English wool production. The English textile trade grew during the 15th century, to the point where the export of wool was discouraged. Over the centuries, various British laws controlled the wool trade or required the use of wool even in burials. The smuggling of wool out of the country, known as owling, was at one time punishable by the cutting off of a hand. After the Restoration of 1660, fine English woolens began to compete with silks in the international market, partly aided by the Navigation Acts; in 1699, the English Crown forbade its American colonies to trade wool with anyone but England herself.
A great deal of the value of woollen textiles was in the dyeing and finishing of the woven product. In each of the centers of the textile trade, the manufacturing process came to be subdivided into a collection of trades, overseen by an entrepreneur in a system called by the English the "putting-out" system, or "cottage industry", and the Verlagssystem by the Germans. In this system of producing wool cloth, once perpetuated in the production of Harris tweeds, the entrepreneur provides the raw materials and an advance, the remainder being paid upon delivery of the product. Written contracts bound the artisans to specified terms. Fernand Braudel traces the appearance of the system in the 13th-century economic boom, quoting a document of 1275.[21] The system effectively bypassed the guilds' restrictions.
Before the flowering of the Renaissance, the Medici and other great banking houses of Florence had built their wealth and banking system on their textile industry based on wool, overseen by the Arte della Lana, the wool guild: wool-textile interests guided Florentine policies. Francesco Datini, the "merchant of Prato", established in 1383 an Arte della Lana for that small Tuscan city. The sheepwalks of Castile were controlled by the Mesta union of sheep-owners. They shaped the landscape and the fortunes of the meseta that lies in the heart of the Iberian peninsula; in the 16th century, a unified Spain allowed export of merino lambs only with royal permission. The German wool-market – based on sheep of Spanish origin – did not overtake British wool until comparatively late. Later, the Industrial Revolution introduced mass-production technology into wool- and wool-cloth-manufacturing. Australia's colonial economy came to depend on sheep-raising, and the Australian wool trade eventually overtook that of the Germans by 1845, furnishing wool for Bradford, which developed as the heart of industrialized woolens production.

Due to decreasing demand for wool with increased use of synthetic fibers, wool production is much less than what it was in the past. The collapse in the price of wool began in late 1966 with a 40% drop; with occasional interruptions, the price has tended down. The result has been sharply reduced production and the movement of resources into production of other commodities, in the case of sheep growers, to production of meat.[25][26][27]
Superwash wool (or washable wool) technology first appeared in the early 1970s, producing wool that has been specially treated so it is machine washable and may be tumble-dried. This wool is produced using an acid bath that removes the "scales" from the fiber, or by coating the fiber with a polymer that prevents the scales from attaching to each other and causing shrinkage. This process results in a fiber that holds longevity and durability better than synthetic materials, while retaining garment shape.[28]
In December 2004, a bale of the then world's finest wool, averaging 11.8 microns, sold for AU$3,000 per kilogram at auction in Melbourne. This fleece wool tested with an average yield of 74.5%, 68 mm (2.7 in) long, and had 40 newtons per kilotex strength. The result was A$279,000 for the bale.[29] The finest bale of wool ever auctioned was sold for a seasonal record of AU$2690 per kilo during June 2008. This bale was produced by the Hillcreston Pinehill Partnership and measured 11.6 microns, 72.1% yield, and had a 43 newtons per kilotex strength measurement. The bale realized $247,480 and was exported to India.[30]
In 2007, a new wool suit was developed and sold in Japan which can be washed in the shower, and which dries off ready to wear within hours with no ironing required. The suit, developed using Australian merino wool, enables woven products made from wool, such as suits, trousers, and skirts, to be cleaned using a domestic shower.[31]
In December 2006, the General Assembly of the United Nations proclaimed 2009 to be the International Year of Natural Fibres, so as to raise the profile of wool and of other natural fibers.
Production
[edit]Global wool production is about 2 million tonnes (2.2 million short tons) per year, of which 60% goes into apparel. Wool comprises ca 3% of the global textile market, but its value is higher owing to dyeing and other modifications of the material.[1] Australia is a leading producer of wool which is mostly from Merino sheep but has been eclipsed by China in terms of total weight.[32] New Zealand (2016) is the third-largest producer of wool, and the largest producer of crossbred wool. Breeds such as Lincoln, Romney, Drysdale, and Elliotdale produce coarser fibers, and wool from these sheep is usually used for making carpets.
In the United States, Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado have large commercial sheep flocks and their mainstay is the Rambouillet (or French Merino). Also, a thriving home-flock contingent of small-scale farmers raise small hobby flocks of specialty sheep for the hand-spinning market. These small-scale farmers offer a wide selection of fleece. Global woolclip (total amount of wool shorn) 2020[33]
| Rank | Country | % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | China | 19[a] |
| 2 | Australia | 16 |
| 3 | New Zealand | 8 |
| 4 | Turkey | 4 |
| 5 | United Kingdom | 4 |
| 6 | Morocco | 3 |
| 7 | Iran | 3 |
| 8 | Russia | 3 |
| 9 | South Africa | 3 |
| 10 | India | 3 |
- ^ percent of global wool-clip (334 million kilograms [740 million pounds] greasy, 2020)
Organic wool has gained in popularity. This wool is limited in supply and much of it comes from New Zealand and Australia.[34] Organic wool has become easier to find in clothing and other products, but these products often carry a higher price.
Wool is environmentally preferable (as compared to petroleum-based nylon or polypropylene) as a material for carpets, as well, in particular when combined with a natural binding and the use of formaldehyde-free glues.
Animal rights groups have noted issues with the production of wool, such as mulesing.
Marketing
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (December 2017) |
Australia
[edit]
About 85% of wool sold in Australia is sold by open cry auction.[35]

Other countries
[edit]
The British Wool Marketing Board operates a central marketing system for UK fleece wool with the aim of achieving the best possible net returns for farmers.
Less than half of New Zealand's wool is sold at auction, while around 45% of farmers sell wool directly to private buyers and end-users.[36]
United States sheep producers market wool with private or cooperative wool warehouses, but wool pools are common in many states. In some cases, wool is pooled in a local market area, but sold through a wool warehouse. Wool offered with objective measurement test results is preferred. Imported apparel wool and carpet wool goes directly to central markets, where it is handled by the large merchants and manufacturers.[37]
Yarn
[edit]Shoddy or recycled wool is made by cutting or tearing apart existing wool fabric and respinning the resulting fibers.[38] As this process makes the wool fibers shorter, the remanufactured fabric is inferior to the original. The recycled wool may be mixed with raw wool, wool noil, or another fiber such as cotton to increase the average fiber length. Such yarns are typically used as weft yarns with a cotton warp. This process was invented in the Heavy Woollen District of West Yorkshire and created a microeconomy in this area for many years.[39]
Worsted is a strong, long-staple, combed wool yarn with a hard surface.[38]
Woolen is a soft, short-staple, carded wool yarn typically used for knitting.[38] In traditional weaving, woolen weft yarn (for softness and warmth) is frequently combined with a worsted warp yarn for strength on the loom.[40]
Uses
[edit]In addition to clothing, wool has been used for blankets, suits, horse rugs, saddle cloths, carpeting, insulation and upholstery. Dyed wool can be used to create other forms of art such as wet and needle felting. Wool felt covers piano hammers, and it is used to absorb odors and noise in heavy machinery and stereo speakers. Ancient Greeks lined their helmets with felt, and Roman legionnaires used breastplates made of wool felt.
Wool as well as cotton has also been traditionally used for cloth diapers.[41] Wool fiber exteriors are hydrophobic (repel water) and the interior of the wool fiber is hygroscopic (attracts water); this makes a wool garment suitable cover for a wet diaper by inhibiting wicking, so outer garments remain dry. Wool felted and treated with lanolin is water resistant, air permeable, and slightly antibacterial, so it resists the buildup of odor. Some modern cloth diapers use felted wool fabric for covers, and there are several modern commercial knitting patterns for wool diaper covers.
Initial studies of woollen underwear have found it prevented heat and sweat rashes because it more readily absorbs the moisture than other fibers.[42]
As an animal protein, wool can be used as a soil fertilizer, being a slow-release source of nitrogen.
Researchers at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology school of fashion and textiles have discovered a blend of wool and Kevlar, the synthetic fiber widely used in body armor, was lighter, cheaper and worked better in damp conditions than Kevlar alone. Kevlar, when used alone, loses about 20% of its effectiveness when wet, so required an expensive waterproofing process. Wool increased friction in a vest with 28–30 layers of fabric, to provide the same level of bullet resistance as 36 layers of Kevlar alone.[43]
Events
[edit]A buyer of Merino wool, Ermenegildo Zegna, has offered awards for Australian wool producers. In 1963, the first Ermenegildo Zegna Perpetual Trophy was presented in Tasmania for growers of "Superfine skirted Merino fleece". In 1980, a national award, the Ermenegildo Zegna Trophy for Extrafine Wool Production, was launched. In 2004, this award became known as the Ermenegildo Zegna Unprotected Wool Trophy. In 1998, an Ermenegildo Zegna Protected Wool Trophy was launched for fleece from sheep coated for around nine months of the year.
In 2002, the Ermenegildo Zegna Vellus Aureum Trophy was launched for wool that is 13.9 microns or finer. Wool from Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, and South Africa may enter, and a winner is named from each country.[44] In April 2008, New Zealand won the Ermenegildo Zegna Vellus Aureum Trophy for the first time with a fleece that measured 10.8 microns. This contest awards the winning fleece weight with the same weight in gold as a prize, hence the name.
In 2010, an ultrafine, 10-micron fleece, from Windradeen, near Pyramul, New South Wales, won the Ermenegildo Zegna Vellus Aureum International Trophy.[45]
Since 2000, Loro Piana has awarded a cup for the world's finest bale of wool that produces just enough fabric for 50 tailor-made suits. The prize is awarded to an Australian or New Zealand wool grower who produces the year's finest bale.[46]
The New England Merino Field days which display local studs, wool, and sheep are held during January, in even numbered years around the Walcha, New South Wales district. The Annual Wool Fashion Awards, which showcase the use of Merino wool by fashion designers, are hosted by the city of Armidale, New South Wales, in March each year. This event encourages young and established fashion designers to display their talents. During each May, Armidale hosts the annual New England Wool Expo to display wool fashions, handicrafts, demonstrations, shearing competitions, yard dog trials, and more.[1]
In July, the annual Australian Sheep and Wool Show is held in Bendigo, Victoria. This is the largest sheep and wool show in the world, with goats and alpacas, as well as woolcraft competitions and displays, fleece competitions, sheepdog trials, shearing, and wool handling. The largest competition in the world for objectively measured fleeces is the Australian Fleece Competition, which is held annually at Bendigo. In 2008, 475 entries came from all states of Australia, with first and second prizes going to the Northern Tablelands fleeces.[47]
See also
[edit]Production
[edit]Processing
[edit]Refined products
[edit]Organizations
[edit]Miscellaneous wool and animal textiles
[edit]Inorganic wool
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Braaten, Ann W. (2005). "Wool". In Steele, Valerie (ed.). Encyclopedia of Clothing and Fashion. Vol. 3. Thomson Gale. pp. 441–443. ISBN 0-684-31394-4.
- ^ Simmons, Paula (2009). Storey's Guide to Raising Sheep. North Adams, MA: Storey Publishing. pp. 315–316.
- ^ D'Arcy, John B. (1986). Sheep and Wool Technology. Kensington: NSW University Press. ISBN 0-86840-106-4.
- ^ Wool Facts Archived 2014-05-26 at the Wayback Machine. Aussiesheepandwool.com.au. Retrieved on 2012-08-05.
- ^ Wool History Archived 2008-05-09 at the Wayback Machine. Tricountyfarm.org. Retrieved on 2012-08-05.
- ^ a b The Land, Merinos – Going for Green and Gold, p.46, US use flame resistance, 21 August 2008
- ^ Admani, Shehla; Jacob, Sharon E. (2014-04-01). "Allergic contact dermatitis in children: review of the past decade". Current Allergy and Asthma Reports. 14 (4): 421. doi:10.1007/s11882-014-0421-0. PMID 24504525. S2CID 33537360.
- ^ a b c d e Preparation of Australian Wool Clips, Code of Practice 2010–2012, Australian Wool Exchange (AWEX), 2010
- ^ "Technology in Australia 1788–1988". Australian Science and Technology Heritage Center. 2001. Archived from the original on 2006-05-14. Retrieved 2006-04-30.
- ^ Wu Zhao (1987). A study of wool carbonizing (PhD). University of New South Wales. School of Fibre Science and Technology. Archived from the original on 30 October 2014.
- ^ Bradford Industrial Museum 2015.
- ^ "Merino Sheep in Australia". Archived from the original on 2006-11-05. Retrieved 2006-11-10.
- ^ Van Nostran, Don. "Wool Management – Maximizing Wool Returns". Mid-States Wool growers Cooperative Association. Archived from the original on 2010-01-01. Retrieved 2006-11-10.
- ^ D'Arcy, John B. (1986). Sheep Management & Wool Technology. NSW University Press. ISBN 0-86840-106-4.
- ^ "1PP Certification". Australian Wool Exchange. Archived from the original on 2012-07-18.
- ^ a b c d Robert E. Freer. "The Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939." Archived 2016-06-05 at the Wayback Machine Temple Law Quarterly. 20.1 (July 1946). p. 47. Reprinted at ftc.gov. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
- ^ Ensminger, M. E.; R. O. Parker (1986). Sheep and Goat Science, Fifth Edition. Danville, Illinois: The Interstate Printers and Publishers Inc. ISBN 0-8134-2464-X.
- ^ Weaver, Sue (2005). Sheep: small-scale sheep keeping for pleasure and profit. Irvine, CA: Hobby Farm Press, an imprint of BowTie Press, a division of BowTie Inc. ISBN 1-931993-49-1.
- ^ Smith, Barbara; Kennedy, Gerald; Aseltine, Mark (1997). Beginning Shepherd's Manual, Second Edition. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. ISBN 0-8138-2799-X.
- ^ "Fibre history". Woolmark. Archived from the original on 2006-08-28.
- ^ a b c d Fernand Braudel, 1982. The Wheels of Commerce, vol 2 of Civilization and Capitalism (New York:Harper & Row), pp. 312–317
- ^ Bell, Adrian R.; Brooks, Chris; Dryburgh, Paul (2007). The English Wool Market, c.1230–1327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521859417.
- ^
Parks, George Bruner (1954). The English Traveler to Italy. Storia e letteratura, volume 46. Vol. 1. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. p. 407. Retrieved 1 February 2025.
[...] the establishment at Pisa of a factory [...] which would export its cloths to the Crimea in exchange for Russian furs. [...] Portinari thought of making Pisa a wool centre for the Mediterranean, whence English wool might be dispatched to Florence, Genoa, and Milan for manufacture, and Spanish wool be manufactured in Pisa for export to the east
- ^ "Florentine Woolen Manufacture in the Sixteenth Century:Crisis and New Entrepreneurial Strategies" (PDF). THe Business History Conference.
- ^ "The end of pastoral dominance" Archived 2007-08-19 at the Wayback Machine. Teara.govt.nz (2009-03-03). Retrieved on 2012-08-05.
- ^ 1301.0 – Year Book Australia, 2000 Archived 2017-07-01 at the Wayback Machine, Australian Bureau of Statistics
- ^ "The History of Wool" Archived 2015-04-27 at the Wayback Machine. johnhanly.com
- ^ Superwash Wool Archived 2009-03-09 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 10 November 2008
- ^ World’s Finest Bale Record Broken. landmark.com.au, 22 November 2004
- ^ Country Leader, NSW Wool Sells for a Quarter of a Million, 7 July 2008
- ^ Shower suit Archived 2011-08-22 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 11 November 2008
- ^ "Sheep 101". Archived from the original on 28 November 2016. Retrieved 17 September 2016. According to this chart, US production is around 10,000 tonnes (11,000 short tons), hugely at variance with the percentage list, and way outside year-to-year variability.
- ^ "FAOSTAT". FAOSTAT (Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations Statistics). Retrieved May 17, 2020.
- ^ Speer, Jordan K. (2006-05-01). "Shearing the Edge of Innovation". Apparel Magazine. Archived from the original on 2015-05-26.
- ^ Bolt, C (2004-04-07). "AWH to set up wool auctions". The Age. Retrieved 2019-05-27.
- ^ Wool Production in New Zealand. maf.govt.nz
- ^ Wool Marketing. sheepusa.org
- ^ a b c Kadolph, Sara J, ed. (2007). Textiles (10 ed.). Pearson/Prentice-Hall. p. 63. ISBN 978-0-13-118769-6.
- ^ Shell, Hanna Rose. "Leftovers / Devil's Dust". cabinetmagazine.org.
- ^ Østergård, Else (2004). Woven into the Earth: Textiles from Norse Greenland. Aarhus University Press. p. 50. ISBN 87-7288-935-7.
- ^ Snodgrass, Mary Ellen (2015). World Clothing and Fashion : an Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Social Influence. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. pp. 49–51. ISBN 978-1-317-45167-9. OCLC 910448387.
- ^ ABC Rural Radio: Woodhams, Dr. Libby, New research shows woollen underwear helps prevent rashes Archived 2011-08-23 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 2010-3-24
- ^ Blenkin, Max (2011-04-11). "Wool's tough new image". Country Leader.
- ^ "2004/51/1 Trophy and plaque, Ermenegildo Zegna Vellus Aureum trophy and plaque, plaster / bronze / silver / gold, trophy designed and made by Not Vital for Ermenegildo Zegna, Switzerland, 2001". Powerhouse Museum, Sydney. Archived from the original on 2007-05-19. Retrieved 2008-04-27.
- ^ Country Leader, 26 April 2010, Finest wool rewarded, Rural Press, North Richmond
- ^ Australian Wool Network News, Issue #19, July 2008
- ^ "Fletcher Wins Australian Fleece Comp". Walcha News. 24 July 2008. p. 3. Archived from the original on 27 July 2008. Retrieved 5 August 2012.
External links
[edit]- . . 1914.
- . New International Encyclopedia. 1905.
Wool is a natural keratin-based protein fiber primarily harvested from the fleece of sheep, featuring microscopic scales and crimp that enable interlocking, elasticity, and superior insulation.[1] Its structure allows absorption of up to 30% of its weight in moisture without sensation of wetness, while facilitating breathability, odor resistance, and self-cleaning properties through antimicrobial action and lanolin content.[2][3] These attributes have made wool a foundational textile material for apparel, blankets, and upholstery, prized for durability and thermal regulation across climates.[4] Domestication of sheep for wool production originated around 10,000 years ago in the Near East, with evidence of woven wool fabrics emerging by the fourth millennium BCE as selective breeding enhanced fiber quality.[5] By the medieval period, wool trade drove economic expansion in Europe, particularly England, where it constituted a primary export commodity.[6] In modern times, global greasy wool output stands at approximately 1.98 million metric tons annually, dominated by China (over 350,000 tons), Australia, and New Zealand, reflecting concentrated sheep farming in temperate regions suited to pastoral grazing.[7] Wool's lifecycle advantages include renewability—sheep regrow fleeces yearly—and biodegradability, contrasting with petroleum-derived synthetics that persist as microplastics in environments.[8] However, production entails methane emissions from ruminant digestion and potential land degradation from overgrazing, underscoring trade-offs in natural fiber systems versus synthetic alternatives reliant on fossil fuels.[9] Despite competition from cheaper synthetics since the 20th century, wool maintains niche value in performance textiles due to its inherent flame resistance and shape recovery.[10]
Properties
Physical and Mechanical Properties
Wool fibers exhibit a hierarchical microscopic structure that underpins their functionality. The outer layer, known as the cuticle, consists of overlapping scales that provide a rough surface texture and contribute to fiber cohesion in yarns. [11] The bulk of the fiber, approximately 90%, comprises the cortex, which contains ortho-cortical and para-cortical cells with differing swelling properties; this bilateral arrangement generates the characteristic crimp, typically ranging from 4 to 10 crimps per centimeter, imparting curl and enhancing bulk. [12] [13] Fiber diameters vary from 14 to 45 micrometers, with finer diameters correlating to higher crimp frequency, while staple lengths for apparel-grade wool span 5 to 12 centimeters. [13] Mechanically, wool demonstrates robust tensile strength of 1 to 1.7 grams per denier in dry conditions, decreasing to 0.8 to 1.6 grams per denier when wet due to hydration effects on keratin bonds. [14] It offers high elasticity, with fibers recoverable from extensions up to 30% when dry and 50% when wet, owing to the reversible stretching of alpha-helices in the keratin proteins. [15] Compressional resilience arises from the crimp structure, allowing wool to recover shape after deformation, which supports its use in resilient textiles like carpets. However, prolonged exposure to moisture combined with mechanical agitation, as occurs in machine washing, induces felting, where the cuticle scales interlock and migrate, causing irreversible shrinkage and distortion of wool garments; temperature fluctuations and friction amplify this by facilitating scale separation. [16] Wool's sensory properties include exceptional moisture management, with a standard regain of 13 to 18% and capacity to absorb up to 30% of its weight in water vapor without sensation of wetness, facilitated by hydrophilic keratin sites. [17] [18] Thermal insulation stems from the crimped fibers trapping air pockets, reducing convective heat loss and enabling effective regulation across temperatures. [19] Additionally, inherent flame resistance derives from high nitrogen content (around 14%) and bound moisture, which inhibit ignition and promote charring over melting or dripping. [20]Chemical Composition and Reactivity
Wool fibers consist primarily of keratin proteins, accounting for approximately 95% of their dry weight, with the remainder comprising lipids, minerals, and trace carbohydrates.[21][22] Keratin in wool is an α-helical fibrous protein rich in sulfur-containing amino acids, particularly cystine, which constitutes 7–20% of total amino acid residues and forms intra- and intermolecular disulfide bonds (-S-S-) that confer structural integrity and chemical stability.[23][24] These covalent cross-links, derived from cysteine oxidation, are pivotal to wool's reactivity, as their cleavage or formation alters fiber solubility and mechanical response under chemical treatments. As a hygroscopic material, wool absorbs atmospheric water vapor through hydrogen bonding with polar groups in its keratin structure, achieving an equilibrium moisture regain that varies with relative humidity and temperature—typically 8–9% at 50% RH and up to 16–18% at 65–80% RH under standard conditions.[25][26] This moisture dependence influences chemical interactions, such as enhanced dye penetration and potential for hydrolytic reactions at higher humidities, while the fiber's amphiphilic nature allows it to bind up to 30% of its weight in water without saturation. Wool exhibits pH-dependent reactivity reflective of its proteinaceous composition: it resists degradation in acidic environments (pH 2–6), where protonation stabilizes disulfide bonds and may induce additional cross-linking via hydrogen bonds, but undergoes hydrolysis and disulfide cleavage in alkaline conditions (pH >10), leading to solubilization of peptide chains.[27][28] Solubility increases markedly above pH 11, as alkali disrupts ionic and hydrogen bonds alongside -S-S- linkages, rendering the fiber prone to dissolution in solutions like 0.1 M NaOH. Biodegradation occurs via microbial enzymes such as keratinases from bacteria (e.g., Bacillus spp.) and fungi, which target disulfide bonds and peptide linkages, with rates modulated by environmental factors including pH, oxygen availability, and temperature; neutral to slightly alkaline soils accelerate breakdown compared to acidic ones.[29][30] This biodegradability by specific keratin-degrading bacteria contrasts with wool's natural antimicrobial properties against many odor-causing microbes, primarily due to lanolin lipids providing a bacteriostatic environment and the keratin structure's limited nutrient availability coupled with a mildly acidic surface pH that inhibits proliferation.[31]Sources and Production
Sheep Breeds and Farming Practices
The Merino sheep, developed through selective breeding in Spain from the 12th century, produces fine wool with fiber diameters typically ranging from 17 to 24 microns, known for exceptional softness due to the fine fibers that bend easily against the skin, along with elasticity and moisture-wicking properties, enabling high yields suitable for high-end apparel and outdoor gear.[32][33] The slow growth of these fine fibers contributes to scarcity, combined with production challenges like climate variability and stringent quality demands, making Merino wool more expensive than coarser varieties; it is harvested via annual shearing, similar to other breeds. This breed dominates global fine wool production, particularly in Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, where initial imports in 1797 led to adaptations for arid climates via targeted breeding for resilience and output.[34][35] Romney sheep, originating in England, yield coarser longwool (around 30-35 microns) prized for durability in carpets and outerwear, with fleeces supporting robust fiber length and crimp.[36] Dual-purpose breeds such as Corriedale, a Merino-Lincoln cross developed in the late 19th century, provide medium wool (25-30 microns) alongside meat efficiency, balancing fleece weights with carcass quality.[37] Effective farming practices prioritize rotational grazing, which promotes soil regeneration, distributes manure evenly, and limits parasite accumulation, thereby enhancing pasture productivity and sheep health for sustained wool growth.[38] [39] Nutritional management critically influences fiber quality; deficiencies in protein or energy result in finer but thinner, weaker wool with increased breakage risk, while consistent adequate feeding maintains uniform diameter and staple strength without inducing excessive coarsening from overfeeding.[40] [41] Annual wool yields average 4 to 6 kg per sheep across breeds, modulated by genetics, climate suitability, and husbandry; for example, Australian Merinos achieve higher clips through breeding for dryland tolerance, contrasting lower outputs in nutrient-poor environments.[42] [43] Selective breeding since the 18th century has amplified these factors, prioritizing heritability in fleece weight and micron consistency over environmental variability alone.[34]Harvesting Through Shearing
Sheep are typically sheared once annually, with the process most commonly occurring in spring to remove the winter fleece before warmer weather arrives and to facilitate lambing management.[44] This timing aligns with the sheep's natural growth cycle, where fleece accumulates over 12 months, reaching optimal length for harvesting without excessive vegetable matter contamination. Skilled operators employ powered clippers, capable of processing 8-12 sheep per hour depending on fleece density and animal size.[45] The shearing process involves restraining the sheep in a controlled position—often starting with the belly and legs—using electric or battery-powered handheld machines with reciprocating blades that cut close to the skin, typically leaving 1-2 mm of stubble. Grease wool, the raw fleeces as removed, constitutes the initial harvest, yielding 50-60% clean fiber after accounting for lanolin, dirt, and suint. Belly, shank, and leg wool are routinely separated during shearing due to higher contamination and lower quality, directed into distinct classes for processing.[46] Machine shearing emerged in the late 19th century, pioneered by inventor Frederick Wolseley, whose designs replaced manual blade shears and hand-cranked devices, enabling faster throughput and reduced labor intensity on large stations. By the 1890s, these machines were adopted in Australia and New Zealand, with ongoing blade sharpening and tension adjustments essential to prevent skin nicks, which experienced shearers limit to minimal occurrences through technique and maintenance.[47][48]Initial Post-Harvest Processing
After shearing, the fleece is laid out and skirted to remove contaminated portions such as belly wool, leg wool, tags (urine- or feces-stained fibers), and pieces with high vegetable matter (VM), thereby preserving fiber integrity by minimizing contamination risks that could propagate through subsequent handling.[49][50] This step typically discards 10-30% of the fleece weight, depending on animal condition and environmental exposure, leaving the bulk fleece suitable for further grading while reducing defects that impair processability.[51] Skirting is followed by classing or sorting, where fleeces are grouped by quality metrics including staple length (typically 50-300 mm or 2-12 inches, with longer staples preferred for higher yields and processing efficiency), fiber diameter, color (predominantly white for broad utility), and VM content (ideally under 1-2% to avoid carbonizing costs later).[52][53] These assessments rely on empirical methods like visual inspection, hand crimping for uniformity, and core sampling for VM quantification, enabling separation into lines such as broadback (prime shoulder wool) and inferior types to mitigate blending of low-quality fibers that could degrade overall clip value.[50][54] Sorted wool is then compressed into bales weighing 180-300 kg, depending on regional standards and wool type, with hydraulic presses ensuring tight packing to facilitate transport while avoiding over-compression that damages staples.[55] Bales are wrapped in moisture-proof materials like burlap or plastic liners and stored in cool, dry conditions (below 15-20% relative humidity) to prevent absorption of up to 30% of dry weight in water, which risks microbial growth, self-heating, or premature felting from fiber entanglement.[55][56] This protection maintains greasy wool's natural lanolin barrier against contamination until mill delivery.[55]Historical Development
Origins in Prehistory and Antiquity
Sheep domestication originated in the northern Fertile Crescent during the mid-9th millennium BCE, with early management practices focused on wild mouflon ancestors for meat, milk, and hides rather than wool.[57] Archaeological evidence from sites like Aşıklı Höyük in central Anatolia indicates that selective breeding for woolly coats began emerging around 6000 BCE, transitioning sheep from primarily hairy to fleeced varieties capable of yielding spinnable fibers.[58] This shift is evidenced by zooarchaeological analyses showing increased fleece coverage and density in remains from Neolithic settlements, enabling the production of woven textiles.[59] Early wool utilization is attested by textile fragments and spinning tools from Neolithic contexts, such as spindle whorls and loom weights found in Mesopotamian and Anatolian sites dating to 7000–5000 BCE, suggesting rudimentary yarn production for clothing and cordage.[60] In the Ancient Near East, wool's development facilitated the expansion of sheep herding during the Chalcolithic period (ca. 4500–3000 BCE), where it served as a key economic resource in northern Mesopotamia, supporting intensive production for local use and exchange.[61] Unlike plant fibers, wool's insulating properties and portability made it ideal for pastoral communities, underpinning nomadic lifestyles by providing durable apparel and trade goods that could be carried across arid landscapes without spoilage.[62] By the 3rd millennium BCE, wool textiles appear in archaeological records from eastern Iran at Shahr-i Sokhta, representing some of the earliest direct evidence of spun and woven sheep wool fabrics.[60] In ancient Egypt, wool was used to a limited extent alongside dominant linen production, with blends documented in Old Kingdom contexts around 3000 BCE, though cultural and climatic factors favored flax due to linen's breathability in hot conditions.[63] Roman expansion from the 1st millennium BCE onward further disseminated improved wool breeds across Europe and North Africa, introducing fine-wooled varieties that enhanced textile quality and integrated wool into imperial economies through herding and trade networks.[64] These advancements solidified wool's role in enabling long-distance commerce precursors to later Silk Road routes, where raw fleeces were valued for their versatility in barter.[65]Medieval Trade Dominance
In the 13th to 15th centuries, England's raw wool trade dominated European commerce, with exports primarily directed to Flanders for weaving into high-quality cloth, establishing England as the leading supplier of fine wool. Annual shipments peaked at around 40,000 sacks in the early 14th century, each containing roughly 364 pounds (165 kg) of wool, generating immense wealth through staple ports like Boston and London.[6] [66] Customs duties on these exports, escalating under Edward I, provided the crown with revenues equivalent to over 30% ad valorem taxes at times, financing wars such as those against Wales and Scotland, as well as the construction of Gothic cathedrals often adorned with wool sack symbols by merchant patrons.[67] [6] Cistercian monasteries drove production innovations by breeding sheep for superior fleece quality, maintaining flocks of up to 15,000 in regions like the Pennines and Yorkshire, which supplied premium wool to continental buyers.[68] [69] Italian merchant firms, including the Bardi and Peruzzi, dominated financing through forward contracts with these monasteries, advancing funds for up to 20 years against future clips and extending loans to English kings secured by wool levies, thereby integrating the trade into broader Mediterranean networks.[70] [71] This system created a near-monopoly for elite producers and financiers, though it incentivized smuggling to bypass regulations. The Statute of the Staple enacted in 1275 centralized wool exports at designated ports to curb evasion and ensure royal oversight, yet heavy taxation—reaching one-third or more of wool's value—spurred illicit trade, with smugglers using eastern seaboard routes to Flanders, evading duties worth thousands of marks annually.[72] [73] By 1300, wool constituted approximately 80% of England's total export value, underscoring its causal role in economic expansion and fiscal policy.[74] [75] From the early 15th century, England shifted toward domestic cloth finishing to capture added value, reducing raw wool exports to about 9,700 sacks by 1476 while cloth shipments surged from 10,000 pieces annually in 1350 to over 60,000 by the 1440s, diminishing reliance on Flemish processing.[76] [77] This transition reflected technological adaptations in fulling and dyeing, alongside protective policies, redirecting economic drivers from raw commodity sales to manufactured goods.[6]Industrialization and Global Expansion
The industrialization of wool production began in Britain during the late 18th century with key mechanizations that shifted spinning from domestic hand labor to powered machinery. The spinning jenny, invented by James Hargreaves in 1764–1765 and patented in 1770, enabled one worker to operate multiple spindles simultaneously for spinning wool or cotton yarn, dramatically increasing output and laying groundwork for factory-based textile systems.[78] This was complemented by the development of power looms, with Edmund Cartwright's 1785 invention evolving into widespread adoption by the 1830s for weaving woolen fabrics, as evidenced by government recognition of contributions like Richard Cartwright's refinements in 1809 that boosted British industry efficiency.[79] These innovations, driven by water and steam power, reduced production costs and scaled output, transforming wool from a cottage industry to a mechanized export powerhouse. Colonial expansion accelerated wool's global reach through strategic sheep imports and land exploitation in settler economies. In Australia, the introduction of Spanish-derived Merino sheep in 1797 by figures like John Macarthur initiated fine-wool breeding suited to arid conditions, leading to rapid flock growth and exports that dominated world supply by the mid-19th century.[34] Similar booms occurred in New Zealand and Argentina, where vast pastoral lands fueled sheep populations; New Zealand's wool exports surged alongside refrigeration-enabled meat trade in the late 19th century, while Argentina's production expanded tenfold from the 1850s to 1900, positioning these regions—along with Australia and Uruguay—as primary exporters comprising over half of global trade.[80] In the United States, the 1806 Non-Importation Act and 1807 Embargo Act disrupted British imports, prompting domestic breeding programs with imported Merino and Southdown sheep to build self-sufficiency in woolens.[81] World War I demand for woolen uniforms, blankets, and fabrics further propelled production, with Allied powers securing supplies from dominions like Australia, which held a near-monopoly on fine wool essential for military needs.[82] This wartime surge contributed to global output peaking at approximately 3.06 billion pounds (about 1.39 million short tons) by 1926, reflecting sustained mechanized capacity and colonial yields before interwar fluctuations.[83]Modern Challenges and Revivals
Following World War II, wool faced significant competition from synthetic fibers such as nylon and polyester, which offered lower production costs, greater durability, and easier care, leading to a sharp decline in wool's market share. Demand for wool had already softened due to reduced military usage, and by the mid-1960s, synthetic fibers had begun eroding wool's dominance in apparel and textiles.[84] By the late 20th century, wool's global fiber market share had contracted to approximately 1-2%, reflecting its displacement by synthetics that comprised the majority of textile production.[85][86] Major production disruptions compounded these pressures, notably the 2001 drought in Australia, which accounts for about 70% of global wool supply and saw output fall by 7% in the year ending June 2001 amid widespread flock reductions. In Europe, the shift away from production-linked subsidies under Common Agricultural Policy reforms—initiated in 2005 and accelerating into the 2020s—pressured less efficient sheep farms, favoring market-oriented operations and contributing to a decline in EU sheep numbers. These events underscored wool's vulnerability to environmental shocks and policy changes, prompting industry adaptations toward resilience.[87][88] Revivals emerged in the 1990s with merino wool's resurgence in performance apparel, leveraging its natural moisture-wicking, odor-resistant, and temperature-regulating properties for base layers and outdoor gear, as brands pioneered fine merino blends for active use. This niche recovery gained momentum in the 2010s through regenerative agriculture branding, where initiatives emphasized soil health, carbon sequestration, and biodiversity in wool farming, attracting brands like Patagonia and Allbirds that committed to sourcing from verified regenerative systems to differentiate from synthetics. These efforts repositioned wool as a premium, sustainable alternative, though limited to specialized markets amid ongoing synthetic dominance.[89][90][91]Economics and Markets
Global Production Statistics
Global wool production stood at approximately 1.06 million tonnes of greasy wool in 2023, equivalent to around 1 million tonnes of clean wool after scouring, reflecting stability from the prior year amid steady sheep populations.[92][86] This volume accounts for wool from roughly 90% of the world's billion-plus sheep, with production concentrated in regions suited to pastoral farming.[43] China leads global greasy wool output at 356,193 tonnes in 2022, comprising over 30% of the total and primarily coarser wools for domestic use.[93] Australia ranks second with about 350,000 tonnes of greasy wool in 2024, representing 25% of world supply and dominated by fine Merino types that constitute 70% of fine-grade production.[94] New Zealand follows as a key player, yielding 151,192 tonnes annually, focused on crossbred wools for apparel.[7]| Country | Greasy Wool Production (tonnes) | Year | Share of Global (%) | Primary Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 356,193 | 2022 | ~33 | Coarse/Mixed |
| Australia | ~350,000 | 2024 | ~25 | Fine Merino |
| New Zealand | 151,192 | Recent | ~14 | Crossbred |
Trade Dynamics and Major Exporters
Australia dominates the global wool export market, accounting for approximately $1.99 billion in exports in 2023, representing about 65% of the world's total wool trade value of $3.04 billion.[98][99] The country's exports are heavily oriented toward China, which received $1.58 billion worth, or roughly 79% of Australia's wool shipments by value that year, driven by demand for raw materials in textile manufacturing.[99] Other key destinations include Italy ($139 million) and India ($123 million), reflecting processing hubs in Europe and Asia.[99] New Zealand and the United Kingdom follow as secondary exporters, while the European Union maintains substantial internal trade among member states, facilitated by integrated supply chains and lower intra-bloc tariffs.[98] Trade dynamics are shaped by auction-based price discovery through the Australian Wool Exchange (AWEX) in Sydney, where weekly sales establish benchmarks like the Eastern Market Indicator, promoting transparency and responding to supply-demand signals without heavy reliance on futures contracts.[100] Free-market incentives encourage premium pricing for certified wool, such as non-mulesed or sustainably sourced clips, which can fetch 10-20% higher values due to buyer preferences for ethical standards verifiable through traceability systems. Historical barriers, including tariffs like the U.S. wool import duties until the 1990s, have largely dissipated under WTO agreements, though occasional trade tensions—such as Australia-China disputes in 2020-2021—temporarily disrupted flows before rebounding on competitive pricing.[98] Challenges persist from animal welfare controversies surrounding live sheep exports, distinct from wool but linked via shared farming infrastructure; Australia's decision to phase out sea exports by May 2028 has strained domestic industry relations and drawn scrutiny from trading partners, potentially influencing perceptions of Australian agricultural exports including wool.[101] The European Union's stringent sustainability regulations, outlined in its 2025 agricultural vision, pose risks to wool access by imposing non-tariff barriers like carbon border adjustments, which could elevate costs for non-EU producers despite Australia's low-emission profile.[102] These factors underscore the interplay of regulatory pressures and market-driven quality differentiation in sustaining export competitiveness.Recent Market Trends and Innovations
The global wool market was valued at USD 11.25 billion in 2024 and is projected to expand to USD 21.6 billion by 2032, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.5% from 2025 onward.[103] [104] This trajectory counters narratives of long-term decline by highlighting robust demand for wool as a natural, biodegradable fiber amid rising consumer preference for sustainable fashion alternatives to petroleum-based synthetics.[105] In the United States, the American Sheep Industry Association launched the Wool Action Plan in May 2025 to bolster domestic wool production and supply chains, targeting improvements in breeding, processing infrastructure, and market access to reduce reliance on imports.[106] Parallel innovations in processing technology, including automated sorting, scouring, and spinning machinery, are driving efficiency gains, with the wool processing machinery sector forecasted to grow at a 5.4% CAGR through 2034.[107] [108] Australia, accounting for over 20% of global wool output, anticipates shorn wool production of 251.5 million kilograms greasy in the 2025/26 season, down 10.2% from 2024/25 due to dry conditions and reduced flock sizes.[109] Despite this volume contraction, elevated auction prices—up amid tight supply—have supported grower revenues, with premium merino clips commanding values 15-20% above averages to offset lower yields.[110] These dynamics underscore wool's market resilience, where quality-driven pricing and technological efficiencies sustain profitability even as production faces climatic variability.Processing and Manufacturing
Cleaning and Preparation
Scouring constitutes the initial stage in wool preparation, involving immersion in emulsion baths with detergents and emulsifiers to remove lanolin, suint, dirt, and other soluble impurities from greasy wool.[111] Lanolin typically comprises 10-25% of the raw fleece weight, with yields of clean wool ranging from 50-70% after scouring, depending on fleece quality.[112] The process operates at controlled temperatures of 50-65°C and near-neutral pH to emulsify and extract grease without damaging the keratin fibers, achieving up to 99% removal of soluble contaminants while preserving fiber integrity.[113] Carbonizing follows scouring to eliminate residual vegetable matter, such as burrs, seeds, and grass, which can constitute up to 5% of the input weight in heavily contaminated fleeces.[114] This chemical process entails treating the wool with dilute sulfuric acid at pH 1-2, followed by drying and baking at 100-120°C to carbonize the plant material, which is then mechanically crushed and separated via sieving or air classification.[112] Precise pH management in both scouring and carbonizing minimizes fiber degradation, ensuring overall purity levels exceed 99% for subsequent processing.[111] Sustainability in these stages hinges on wastewater management, as scouring effluent exhibits high biochemical oxygen demand from grease and organics.[112] Common treatments include anaerobic digestion followed by aerobic lagoons or biological reactors, recovering lanolin for commercial use and reducing environmental discharge by over 90% in BOD and suspended solids.[115] Emerging methods, such as biochar adsorption, further enhance pollutant removal while promoting circular economy principles in wool processing.[116]Yarn and Fabric Production
Following cleaning, wool fibers undergo carding or combing to prepare them for yarn production, with processes tailored to produce either woolen or worsted yarns. Carding involves passing fibers through machines with rollers and wires to disentangle, align partially, and create a fluffy batt or sliver suitable for woolen spinning, which results in yarns with a fuzzy texture due to included short fibers and random alignment.[117][118] Combing, applied to longer fibers, further aligns them parallel while removing short fibers (noils) and impurities, yielding a smooth sliver or top for worsted spinning, which produces denser, smoother yarns with enhanced durability and luster.[117][119] Fibers are often sorted by micron diameter during processing to ensure evenness, as finer microns (e.g., under 20 microns for merino) yield softer, more uniform yarns, while variation can affect yarn quality and processing efficiency.[120][121] In worsted systems, this alignment minimizes irregularities, whereas woolen systems tolerate greater fiber disorder for bulkier, warmer yarns.[122][123] Spinning converts these preparations into yarn via methods like ring spinning, which inserts twist by rotating a traveler around a bobbin, producing high-strength yarns ideal for fine wool counts due to controlled fiber migration and minimal hairiness.[124] Open-end (rotor) spinning, by contrast, uses air or mechanical means to assemble fibers without continuous twisting, enabling faster production but yielding bulkier, less even yarns less suited to premium wool applications.[125] Twist levels, measured in turns per meter (tpm), critically influence strength; for example, higher twists around 500 tpm enhance tenacity in worsted wool yarns, though optimal levels vary with count, typically increasing for finer yarns to balance strength and flexibility.[126][127] Yarn is then formed into fabrics through weaving or knitting, with weave types selected for specific properties. Plain weaves interlace warp and weft in a simple over-under pattern, offering balanced durability and resistance to abrasion suitable for lightweight wool garments.[128] Twill weaves, featuring diagonal ribs from offset interlacing, provide superior strength and drape, making them ideal for durable wool suiting or outerwear.[129][130] Knitting loops yarn into interlocked structures for stretchier, more form-fitting wool products like sweaters. To improve cost-efficiency and performance, wool yarns are often blended with synthetics such as nylon or polyester at 10-20% synthetic content, reducing material costs while enhancing resilience without fully compromising wool's natural qualities.[131][132] Higher synthetic ratios up to 50% may be used in budget fabrics, though they can diminish breathability compared to pure wool.[133][134]Advanced Finishing and Treatments
Advanced finishing treatments for wool fabrics primarily address dimensional stability, color retention, and functional enhancements through chemical and physical modifications applied after weaving or knitting. Felting and shrinkage control traditionally involved chlorine-based oxidation to degrade the cuticle scales on wool fibers, followed by application of a polymer resin like Hercosett to smooth the surface and prevent re-felting, enabling machine-washability in superwash processes.[135] However, chlorine treatments generate adsorbable organic halogens (AOX), prompting phase-out in regions like the European Union since the early 2000s due to environmental persistence and toxicity concerns.[135] Eco-friendly alternatives to chlorine include oxidation with natural salts or peroxides, combined with polymer coatings to achieve similar superwash effects without AOX emissions; for instance, processes like Perachem apply polymer patches post-oxidation for continuous treatment of wool tops.[136] [135] Plasma-mediated treatments, using low-temperature gas plasma to etch fiber surfaces and deposit keratin or silicone-based coatings, provide durable felting resistance, retaining efficacy after 20 wash cycles while avoiding chemical effluents.[137] These methods enhance hydrophilicity and mechanical stability without compromising wool's inherent properties. Dyeing of wool fabrics employs acid dyes, particularly 1:2 metal-complex variants, which chelate with fiber keratin via electrostatic and coordination bonds in acidic baths (pH 2-4), yielding high wet and light fastness ratings (typically 4-5 on ISO scales) due to the metal atom's stabilizing role.[138] [139] These dyes offer excellent compatibility in mixtures and saturation levels, applied via exhaust methods at 90-100°C for deep penetration into the fiber cortex.[138] Specialized treatments further impart performance attributes; atmospheric plasma exposure modifies wool surfaces to improve wrinkle recovery by increasing inter-fiber friction and crease resistance through controlled etching and functionalization.[137] Antimicrobial properties leverage wool's natural lanolin content, a wax with inherent bacteriostatic effects against odor-causing microbes such as staphylococci, which can be retained or enhanced during finishing through selective lanolin preservation or impregnation, maintaining efficacy against common bacteria by limiting growth via low nutrient availability and fiber pH without synthetic additives.[140][31] Such treatments ensure wool fabrics meet durability standards for apparel, aligning with demands for sustainable chemistry.[140]Applications and Uses
Apparel and Consumer Textiles
Wool serves as a primary material in clothing items such as sweaters, socks, and base layers, valued for its ability to trap insulating air within crimped fibers, yielding thermal resistance comparable to R-3 to 4 per inch in dense forms. This property enables effective warmth retention in cold conditions, as demonstrated in merino wool activewear that regulates body temperature during exercise by buffering moisture 96% better than polyester and 45% better than cotton; merino wool is one of the most widely used types in high-end clothing and outdoor gear due to its superior softness, moisture management, and performance properties.[141] Socks made from wool blends exhibit extended wear life, with 80/20 wool-nylon variants lasting three times longer than pure wool under repeated use and washing cycles.[142] In activewear and outer garments, wool's hygroscopic nature facilitates moisture wicking, absorbing up to one-third of its weight in sweat while allowing evaporation to keep skin dry, outperforming synthetics in dynamic comfort during activities like hiking or running.[143] Additional performance attributes include natural odor resistance from lanolin's antibacterial effects, permitting garments to remain fresh for multiple days or weeks between washes without developing persistent smells, unlike cotton or polyester.[144] Wool fabrics also provide inherent UV protection, typically achieving UPF ratings of 20 to 50+, blocking 95-98% of UVB rays depending on weave density and color.[145] For home textiles, wool features prominently in carpets and blankets, where its elastic fibers resist crushing and matting, offering longevity notably exceeding that of synthetic alternatives in high-traffic areas.[146] Wool carpets maintain resilience over time, with natural durability supporting 20-30 years of use in residential settings compared to 10-15 years for many nylon or polypropylene options under similar conditions.[147] Blankets woven from wool provide superior insulation and breathability, historically employed in military uniforms and felts for their capacity to retain warmth without trapping excess heat.[148]Industrial and Technical Applications
Wool fibers are employed in building insulation as felts and composites, providing thermal and acoustic performance due to their porous structure and low thermal conductivity, typically ranging from 0.035 to 0.040 W/m·K in sheep wool-based panels. [149] These materials absorb sound effectively, with coarse wool felts achieving noise reduction coefficients (NRC) of 0.3 to 0.9, influenced by thickness and density, making them suitable for partition walls and ceilings. [150] [151] In geotextiles, wool ropes arranged in meandric patterns form erosion-control fabrics that stabilize ditch banks and slopes by promoting vegetation growth while resisting hydraulic forces, as demonstrated in field tests where they prevented immediate soil sliding. [152] Wool's natural flame resistance, stemming from its high nitrogen and moisture content in keratin, allows it to smolder rather than ignite or drip, enhancing safety in fire-prone civil engineering contexts without synthetic additives. [153] Wool reinforces polymer composites for automotive interiors, where sheep wool fibers in foam-core layered structures improve vibration damping and reduce noise transmission, as shown in mechanical testing of natural fiber-reinforced panels. In medical textiles, wool's absorbency and biocompatibility support applications like wound dressings and bandages, leveraging its ability to manage moisture and promote healing in biomedical composites. [154] For environmental remediation, recycled wool nonwovens serve as oil spill sorbents with capacities of 5.48 to 5.56 g/g for crude oil, surpassing inorganic alternatives like sepiolite (0.19 g/g) due to wool's fibrous structure and oleophilic properties. [155] Optimized wool fibers can reach up to 22.54 g/g for motor oil, enabling efficient hydrocarbon recovery in marine spills. [156]Environmental Impacts
Lifecycle Assessment and Emissions
Life cycle assessments (LCAs) of wool evaluate environmental impacts from raw material extraction through production, use, and disposal, adhering to standards like ISO 14040 and 14044. These studies emphasize the farm stage, where biological processes in sheep dominate resource use and emissions, followed by processing, consumer use (e.g., washing), and end-of-life phases. Variability arises from regional practices, such as extensive grazing in Australia versus intensive systems elsewhere, and allocation methods for co-products like meat and milk, often based on economic value.[157][158] Key inputs include land for pasture-based grazing, typically 10-20 hectares per tonne of wool in low-intensity systems, supporting natural forage growth. Water consumption is predominantly green water from rainfall, with total footprints ranging from 500-1,000 liters per kg of clean wool, minimizing reliance on irrigated blue water. Energy inputs at farm level are low, mainly from feed production and animal maintenance, though processing stages add fossil fuel use for scouring and spinning.[159] Greenhouse gas emissions are primarily methane (CH₄) from sheep enteric fermentation, estimated at 15-25 kg CO₂-equivalent per kg of wool at farm gate, comprising 70-90% of on-farm impacts. Total cradle-to-farm-gate footprints range from 14-49 kg CO₂e per kg of wool, depending on productivity, feed efficiency, and allocation; for instance, Australian fine-wool systems average around 25 kg CO₂e/kg greasy wool. Processing and manufacturing contribute 5-10 kg CO₂e/kg, mainly from energy-intensive cleaning and dyeing, while the full cradle-to-grave assessment yields 20-50 kg CO₂e/kg, excluding potential offsets. Well-managed pastures enhance soil carbon sequestration, which can mitigate 10-30% of emissions through root biomass and reduced tillage, though quantification varies by soil type and management.[160][161][162] At end-of-life, wool exhibits low waste impacts as a fully biodegradable protein fiber, decomposing in soil within 3-6 months via microbial action, releasing nitrogen and other nutrients without persistent pollutants or microplastic formation. Landfill methane from decomposition is minimal compared to farm-stage emissions, and composting or soil incorporation further reduces net burdens. LCAs note that wool's renewability from annual sheep clips supports cyclic resource use, though end-of-life credits are often conservative in models.[163][164]Comparisons with Synthetic Alternatives
Wool exhibits greater durability than many petroleum-based synthetic fibers such as polyester, with garments often lasting several times longer due to the natural elasticity of wool fibers, which can withstand over 20,000 bends without breaking, thereby reducing the need for frequent replacements and associated manufacturing emissions across the product lifecycle.[165][166] In contrast, synthetic fibers like polyester typically degrade faster under repeated use and washing, necessitating higher replacement rates that amplify cumulative environmental costs despite lower initial production energy in some cases.[166] A key distinction lies in pollution profiles: synthetic textiles shed microplastic fibers during laundering, with a single load of polyester clothing releasing up to 700,000 such particles into waterways, contributing to persistent marine and soil contamination that natural wool avoids entirely.[167] Wool's biodegradability further mitigates end-of-life impacts, decomposing in soil within months and returning nutrients, whereas synthetics persist for centuries, exacerbating long-term ecological burdens beyond production-phase comparisons.[168] Synthetics rely on non-renewable fossil feedstocks, requiring approximately 2 kilograms of crude oil to produce 1 kilogram of polyester fiber, tying their supply to volatile petroleum extraction and geopolitical dependencies.[169] Wool, derived from annual sheep shearing, operates on a renewable biological cycle independent of fossil inputs, though it involves upfront biogenic methane emissions from livestock that must be weighed against synthetics' indefinite persistence.[170] Regenerative grazing practices in wool production can offset emissions through soil carbon sequestration, achieving net removals of over 1.4 metric tons of CO2 equivalent per hectare annually by enhancing soil organic matter and perennial vegetation.[171] This contrasts with synthetic fibers' lack of such regenerative potential, highlighting how oversimplified narratives prioritizing cradle-to-gate emissions overlook wool's full-system advantages in durability, renewability, and soil-based carbon cycling when managed holistically.| Aspect | Wool | Synthetic Fibers (e.g., Polyester) |
|---|---|---|
| Feedstock Dependency | Renewable (annual sheep clips) | Non-renewable (∼2 kg crude oil per kg fiber) |
| Durability & Replacements | High elasticity; lasts years longer, fewer cycles | Faster wear; higher replacement frequency |
| Microplastic Shedding | None | Up to 700,000 fibers per wash load |
| End-of-Life Persistence | Biodegrades in months | Persists centuries; non-biodegradable |
| Sequestration Potential | Net 1.4+ t CO2/ha/yr via regenerative methods | None inherent |