Hubbry Logo
Production planningProduction planningMain
Open search
Production planning
Community hub
Production planning
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Production planning
Production planning
Production planning
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Role of Production Planning in the Production Cycle.

Production planning is the planning of production and manufacturing modules in a company or industry. It utilizes the resource allocation of activities of employees, materials and production capacity, in order to serve different customers.[1]

Different types of production methods, such as single item manufacturing, batch production, mass production, continuous production etc. have their own type of production planning. Production planning can be combined with production control into production planning and control, or it can be combined with enterprise resource planning.

Overview

[edit]

Production planning is the future of production. It can help in efficient manufacturing or setting up of a production site by facilitating required needs.[2] A production plan is made periodically for a specific time period, called the planning horizon. It can comprise the following activities:

  • Determination of the required product mix and factory load to satisfy customers needs.[3]
  • Matching the required level of production to the existing resources.[4]
  • Scheduling and choosing the actual work to be started in the manufacturing facility"[1]
  • Setting up and delivering production orders to production facilities.[5]

In order to develop production plans, the production planner or production planning department needs to work closely together with the marketing department and sales department. They can provide sales forecasts, or a listing of customer orders."[6] The "work is usually selected from a variety of product types which may require different resources and serve different customers. Therefore, the selection must optimize customer-independent performance measures such as cycle time and customer-dependent performance measures such as on-time delivery."[1]

A critical factor in production planning is "the accurate estimation of the productive capacity of available resources, yet this is one of the most difficult tasks to perform well".[7] Production planning should always take "into account material availability, resource availability and knowledge of future demand".[5]

History

[edit]
Planning department bulletin board, 1911.

Modern production planning methods and tools have been developed since late 19th century. Under Scientific Management, the work for each man or each machine is mapped out in advance (see image). The origin of production planning back goes another century. Kaplan (1986) summarized that "the demand for information for internal planning and control apparently arose in the first half of the 19th century when firms, such as textile mills and railroads, had to devise internal administrative procedures to coordinate the multiple processes involved in the performance of the basic activity (the conversion of raw materials into finished goods by textile mills, the transportation of passengers and freight by the railroads."[8]

Herrmann (1996) further describes the circumstances in which new methods for internal planning and control evolved: "The first factories were quite simple and relatively small. They produced a small number of products in large batches. Productivity gains came from using interchangeable parts to eliminate time-consuming fitting operations. Through the late 1800s, manufacturing firms were concerned with maximizing the productivity of the expensive equipment in the factory. Keeping utilization high was an important objective. Foremen ruled their shops, coordinating all of the activities needed for the limited number of products for which they were responsible. They hired operators, purchased materials, managed production, and delivered the product. They were experts with superior technical skills, and they (not a separate staff of clerks) planned production. Even as factories grew, they were just bigger, not more complex.[9]

About production planning Herrmann (1996) recounts that "production scheduling started simply also. Schedules, when used at all, listed only when work on an order should begin or when the order is due. They didn't provide any information about how long the total order should take or about the time required for individual operations ..."[9]

In 1923 Industrial Management cited a Mr. Owens who had observed: "Production planning is rapidly becoming one of the most vital necessities of management. It is true that every establishment, no matter how large or how small has production planning in some form; but a large percentage of these do not have planning that makes for an even flow of material, and a minimum amount of money tied up in inventories."[10]

Topics

[edit]

Types of planning

[edit]

Different types of production planning can be applied:

Related kind of planning in organizations

Production control

[edit]

Production control is the activity of controlling the workflow in the production. It is partly complementary to production planning.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Production planning

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Production planning is the process of developing tactical plans that determine the overall level of output, along with associated activities, to best meet current and anticipated market while optimizing use. It encompasses the strategic allocation of labor, materials, , and capacity to ensure efficient production operations across various industries, particularly . At its core, production planning integrates several interconnected components to bridge high-level business objectives with day-to-day execution. These include aggregate production planning, which sets production rates, workforce levels, and investments over a medium-term horizon (typically 6–18 months) to balance for product families; master production scheduling, which translates aggregate plans into specific product schedules; material requirements planning (MRP), which calculates the materials and components needed based on the master schedule; and shop floor control, which monitors and adjusts real-time production activities. This hierarchical structure allows organizations to respond to fluctuating demand, minimize costs such as holding and overtime, and maintain quality standards. The importance of production planning lies in its role in enhancing , reducing waste, and improving responsiveness to market changes. By and aligning resources, it helps manufacturers avoid stockouts, , and delays, ultimately contributing to cost savings and higher . Common strategies in production planning include the level strategy, which maintains steady production rates and uses buffers to handle demand variations; the chase strategy, which adjusts and output to match demand fluctuations; and hybrid approaches that combine elements of both for balanced optimization. These methods are often supported by software tools and data-driven models to handle complexity in dynamic environments.

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

Production planning is the process of anticipating and organizing the production activities required to meet anticipated for or services, determining in advance what to produce, when to produce it, how to produce it, and by whom, with the goal of achieving and cost-effectiveness. This involves coordinating inputs such as raw materials, labor, machinery, and capital to ensure they are available in the right quantities at the right times, transforming them into outputs according to a predefined schedule. As a core function of , it supports tactical decision-making to align production with organizational objectives. The scope of production planning encompasses across labor, materials, and equipment to optimize utilization and minimize waste, while considering varying time horizons from short-term tactical adjustments (e.g., weekly or monthly schedules) to long-term strategic forecasts (e.g., annual or multi-year capacity expansions). It integrates closely with by synchronizing production schedules with , levels, and distribution to ensure seamless flow from suppliers to customers. Key activities include selecting the optimal product mix based on demand patterns, sequencing operations to minimize bottlenecks, and balancing production rates to maintain steady output without overburdening resources. Unlike production execution, which involves the actual implementation and real-time monitoring of processes to convert plans into physical outputs, production planning focuses solely on the preparatory and anticipatory stages, setting the framework before operations commence. Its roots trace back to early 20th-century principles, which emphasized systematic planning to improve industrial efficiency.

Objectives and Importance

Production planning aims to achieve several core objectives that align operational activities with organizational goals. Primarily, it seeks to minimize production costs by optimizing the use of labor, materials, and equipment, thereby avoiding inefficiencies such as or idle resources. Another key objective is to maximize through streamlined workflows and reduced manufacturing cycle times, ensuring that production processes are coordinated across departments for a steady output flow. Additionally, production planning focuses on ensuring timely delivery of goods in the right quantities and to meet demands, which directly supports optimization by maintaining balanced stock levels without excess accumulation. These objectives collectively enable manufacturers to respond effectively to market fluctuations while upholding resource utilization standards. The importance of production planning lies in its ability to drive organizational success by reducing waste and enhancing overall competitiveness. Effective planning minimizes material and time wastage, leading to significant cost savings—for instance, by preventing through accurate alignment, which can lower holding expenses. It improves by prioritizing on-time delivery rates, often targeting benchmarks above 95% in advanced systems, which builds trust and in competitive markets. Furthermore, production planning boosts metrics like , indicating how quickly stock is replenished and sold, which reflects efficient capital use and reduced financial strain from tied-up assets. Beyond operational gains, production planning plays a pivotal role in broader strategic objectives, such as profitability and market responsiveness. By fostering adaptability to changes and integrating with functions, it enables firms to achieve higher profit margins through economical and minimized backorders. This strategic linkage not only enhances economy but also positions organizations to navigate uncertainties, ultimately contributing to sustained growth and .

Historical Development

Origins and Early Methods

Production planning originated in the late 18th and early 19th centuries during the , as transformed artisanal workshops into factories capable of larger-scale output. This shift necessitated basic coordination of labor, materials, and machinery to meet growing demand for standardized goods, marking the transition from craftsmanship to structured processes. A pivotal advancement came in 1798 when established a near , to produce under a U.S. government contract for 10,000 units. Whitney's innovation of —standardized components that could be assembled without custom fitting—enabled more predictable planning and assembly, reducing reliance on skilled artisans and laying groundwork for systematic production flows. This approach, demonstrated through water-powered machinery and division of labor, influenced later implementations at the , where production time per was reduced from 21 man-days to about 9 by 1799. Early production planning methods were informal and rule-of-thumb based, primarily handled by plant foremen who juggled scheduling, material allocation, and shipments in setups. These batches allowed factories to process groups of similar items sequentially, optimizing utilization by minimizing setup changes while employing simple ledger-based tracking to avoid shortages or overstock. Such practices suited the era's job-shop-like factories, where output was organized around limited product varieties and manual oversight. Frederick Winslow Taylor advanced these foundations with his 1911 publication , introducing time-motion studies to analyze and standardize work tasks for greater efficiency in planning. By breaking down operations into measurable elements and assigning optimal methods to workers, Taylor's approach shifted planning from intuitive judgments toward data-driven techniques, influencing how factories sequenced tasks and allocated resources. Despite these innovations, early methods remained reactive—responding to immediate orders rather than anticipating future needs—and were ill-equipped for high-variety or complex production, limiting scalability in diverse markets.

20th-Century Evolution

The advent of catalyzed a profound surge in production planning to support of military goods, transforming industries from peacetime consumer to wartime imperatives. In the United States, the implemented the Controlled Materials Plan in 1943, which centralized allocation of critical resources like and aluminum to coordinate output across sectors, enabling unprecedented scaling of , ship, and munitions . This era marked the formal introduction of (OR) techniques, initially developed for and resource optimization, such as analyzing convoy routing and bombing efficiency to minimize waste and maximize throughput. Post-war developments in the and built on these foundations, integrating early computer technologies to automate inventory and production control, thereby enhancing efficiency beyond manual methods derived from principles like Taylorism. The , introduced in 1954 as the first mass-produced computer, facilitated computational support for production scheduling and inventory tracking in firms, processing batch data for demand calculations and . By the mid-, Joseph Orlicky pioneered (MRP I) at , formalizing time-phased planning for dependent demand items using bill-of-materials explosions on computers, which allowed precise determination of material needs based on master production schedules. A key milestone was the 1957 formation of the American Production and Inventory Control Society (APICS) by production managers, which established certification programs and standards to professionalize planning practices across industries. The 1970s and 1980s witnessed further maturation, with MRP evolving into (MRP II) to incorporate , shop floor control, and financial integration, addressing limitations in earlier systems by simulating resource feasibility before execution. Developed through efforts by consultants like Oliver Wight, MRP II enabled closed-loop planning, where feedback from production adjusted forecasts and schedules in real time. Concurrently, Japanese manufacturing innovations, particularly the system from Toyota's Production System, exerted significant influence on Western practices during the 1980s, promoting pull-based just-in-time inventory to reduce waste and improve flow, as Western firms adopted these methods amid competitive pressures from Japanese automakers.

Core Planning Processes

Demand Forecasting

Demand forecasting serves as the foundational step in production planning by estimating future customer demand to determine appropriate production volumes and avoid over- or under-production. This process helps organizations align resources with market needs, minimizing costs associated with excess or stockouts. methods are broadly categorized into qualitative and quantitative approaches; qualitative methods rely on expert opinions, , and judgmental inputs from teams or executives, making them suitable for new products or volatile markets where historical data is limited. In contrast, quantitative methods use statistical models and historical data for more objective predictions, such as time-series analysis, which is preferred for stable products with established patterns. Key quantitative techniques include moving averages and . Moving averages calculate the average over a fixed number of past periods to smooth out short-term fluctuations and generate forecasts, providing a simple baseline for stable environments. , a more responsive method, applies exponentially decreasing weights to past observations, emphasizing recent data while still incorporating historical trends; its core formula is Ft+1=αDt+(1−α)FtF_{t+1} = \alpha D_t + (1 - \alpha) F_t, where Ft+1F_{t+1} is the forecast for the next period, α\alpha is the smoothing constant (typically between 0 and 1), DtD_t is the actual in period tt, and FtF_t is the previous forecast. For with trends or , adjustments are made by incorporating linear trend components or multiplicative seasonal factors into these models to account for patterns like holiday peaks or cyclical economic shifts. The accuracy of demand forecasts is influenced by several factors, including market trends that reflect changing consumer preferences, economic indicators such as GDP growth or inflation rates, and the quality of historical . Poor or unaccounted external variables, like competitive actions or supply disruptions, can lead to significant errors, underscoring the need for regular model validation. To evaluate forecast performance, metrics like Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) are commonly used, which measures the average between forecasted and actual values, providing a straightforward indicator of reliability without considering error direction. These demand forecasts directly integrate into downstream processes, such as , to guide and production scheduling.

Capacity and Resource Planning

Capacity and resource planning in production management involves evaluating the alignment between available production resources and the requirements derived from demand forecasts to ensure efficient operations. This process assesses key elements such as machine hours, labor shifts, and material availability against projected needs, aiming to prevent underutilization or overloads. Rough-cut capacity planning (RCCP) serves as a foundational technique, providing a high-level validation of the by converting it into essential resource demands without detailed sequencing. A primary objective of capacity planning is to determine the feasible production rate by comparing actual capacity—often measured in operational units like hours or shifts—with required capacity based on planned output. For instance, in , planners calculate the total machine hours needed for a product mix and compare them to available shifts, incorporating factors like setup times and . This assessment helps identify potential shortfalls early, allowing adjustments such as or before detailed scheduling. Common methods for managing capacity include level and chase strategies. The level strategy maintains a constant production rate over time, smoothing workforce and resource use to minimize hiring/firing costs and inventory fluctuations, though it may lead to excess stock during low-demand periods. In contrast, the chase strategy dynamically adjusts production to match demand variations, such as by varying workforce size or subcontracting, which reduces inventory but increases flexibility costs like training. These approaches are often evaluated using the capacity utilization formula: Capacity Utilization=(Actual OutputPotential Output)×100\text{Capacity Utilization} = \left( \frac{\text{Actual Output}}{\text{Potential Output}} \right) \times 100 This metric quantifies efficiency, with rates above 85% typically indicating optimal resource use in manufacturing settings. Resource allocation in production planning distinguishes between finite and infinite loading techniques. Infinite loading assigns tasks to resources without capacity limits, generating theoretical schedules that may result in overloads and unrealistic timelines. Finite loading, however, respects resource constraints by sequencing jobs only within available capacity, promoting feasible plans but requiring more computational effort. Effective allocation also involves bottleneck identification through the (TOC), which pinpoints the system's limiting factor—such as a slow —and prioritizes improvements there to maximize throughput. TOC, introduced by , emphasizes exploiting the constraint before addressing non-bottlenecks. Tools like load profiling charts visualize resource demands over time, plotting workloads against capacity to highlight peaks and valleys for proactive balancing. These charts, often derived from bill-of-resources data, enable planners to simulate scenarios and adjust for variables such as s—the duration from order to delivery—and safety stocks, which buffer against uncertainties by adding extra equivalents in capacity calculations. For example, extending planned capacity by incorporating safety margins accounts for lead time variability in supply chains, ensuring reliability without excessive overplanning.

Types of Production Planning

Aggregate Planning

Aggregate planning, also known as aggregate production planning (APP), is a medium-term planning process that determines overall production rates, levels, and strategies to balance supply and capacity with forecasted over a planning horizon typically spanning 2 to 18 months. This approach operates at an aggregate level, focusing on product families or total output rather than individual items, and serves as a bridge between strategic long-term decisions and short-term operational scheduling. The primary objective is to minimize total costs while meeting requirements, considering fluctuations such as , without delving into detailed item-specific allocations. Key strategies in aggregate planning include pure and mixed approaches, each involving trade-offs among various costs such as hiring and firing, , subcontracting, holding, and potential shortages. The level strategy maintains a constant production rate and size, using to buffer variations, which helps stabilize but may increase holding costs during low- periods. In contrast, the chase strategy adjusts production to match each period by varying through hiring, firing, or subcontracting, minimizing costs but potentially incurring high adjustment expenses like or severance. Mixed strategies combine elements of both, such as a stable core supplemented by or temporary hires, to optimize cost trade-offs based on specific constraints like labor market conditions or limits. These strategies are evaluated by comparing total costs, with mixed approaches often yielding the lowest overall expenses in practice. Mathematically, aggregate planning is frequently formulated as a problem to find the optimal solution. The objective is to minimize the ZZ, expressed as: min⁡Z=∑t=1T(CpPt+ChIt+CoOt+CfFt+CsSt+CiHt)\min Z = \sum_{t=1}^{T} \left( C_p P_t + C_h I_t + C_o O_t + C_f F_t + C_s S_t + C_i H_t \right) where PtP_t is production in period tt, ItI_t is ending , OtO_t is , FtF_t is subcontracting, HtH_t is hiring, StS_t is firing, and CC terms represent respective costs, over TT periods. Constraints ensure satisfaction (Pt+It−1−It=DtP_t + I_{t-1} - I_t = D_t, where DtD_t is ), capacity limits (e.g., Pt≤KWtP_t \leq K W_t, with KK as and WtW_t as workforce), and non-negativity. This model can be solved using tools like LINGO or spreadsheets to evaluate strategy alternatives. Aggregate planning is particularly suited to industries with seasonal demand patterns, such as apparel , where production must for peak seasons like holidays while managing off-peak , or consumer goods like furniture, where applications have demonstrated cost reductions of up to 23% compared to manual trial-and-error methods. In these contexts, the planning horizon aligns with sales cycles, enabling proactive adjustments to workforce and to avoid stockouts or excess capacity.

Detailed Scheduling and MRP

Detailed scheduling represents the operational layer of production planning, focusing on the precise timing and sequencing of activities over short horizons, typically weeks or days, to meet the demands outlined in higher-level plans. It translates broader production targets into actionable work orders, ensuring resources are allocated efficiently to produce specific items at specified times. This process is essential for minimizing delays, optimizing throughput, and aligning material availability with operational needs. The (MPS) serves as the foundational input for detailed scheduling, providing a time-phased breakdown of end-item production requirements derived from aggregate planning outputs. It specifies the quantity and delivery dates for finished goods on a weekly basis, linking forecasted to manufacturing capacity while considering constraints like labor and availability. Developed as a key component of early MRP systems, the MPS enables between customer orders and internal production, reducing lead times and levels. Material Requirements Planning (MRP) builds directly on the MPS to manage dependent demand for components and subassemblies, using a structured explosion of the bill of materials (BOM) to identify all required inputs at each level of production. The BOM explosion process decomposes the end items into their constituent parts, propagating requirements downward through the product structure to generate gross requirements for each item. Net requirements are then calculated by subtracting on-hand inventory and scheduled receipts from gross requirements, yielding the actual quantities needed to fulfill the schedule without excess stock. This method, pioneered by Joseph Orlicky in the , ensures timely or production of materials while accounting for lead times and lot-sizing rules. Once material needs are determined, detailed scheduling sequences the operations required to assemble or process items, employing techniques like forward and backward scheduling to establish start and end times. Forward scheduling begins from an available start date—such as when materials arrive—and progresses forward to compute completion dates, which is useful for maximizing resource utilization in ongoing workflows. Backward scheduling, conversely, starts from the MPS due date and works backward to determine the necessary start time, prioritizing on-time delivery by identifying potential delays early. These methods help balance workloads and sequence jobs to avoid bottlenecks. Gantt charts provide a visual representation of the detailed , displaying operations as horizontal bars against a timeline to illustrate durations, dependencies, and resource assignments. For instance, in a simple assembly process, a Gantt chart might show overlapping tasks like cutting materials (days 1-2) and (days 3-6), with color-coding for completed versus pending work to facilitate quick status assessments. This tool is particularly effective for non-complex schedules where activities have minimal interdependencies, aiding planners in monitoring progress and making adjustments. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems play a pivotal role in automating detailed scheduling and MRP, integrating data across modules to execute calculations and generate schedules in real time. Systems like SAP S/4HANA, for example, trigger automatic scheduling of operations during MRP runs, optimizing sequences based on resource constraints, setup times, and availability while propagating changes across dependent tasks. These platforms reduce manual errors, enable scenario simulations, and support features like alerts for overloads, making them indispensable for scalable production environments.

Production Control

Monitoring and Adjustment Techniques

Monitoring and adjustment techniques in production planning involve real-time oversight of operational execution to detect deviations from planned schedules and implement corrective actions, ensuring alignment with production goals. These techniques bridge the gap between initial planning and actual output by providing mechanisms for ongoing evaluation and responsiveness to unforeseen events. Key performance indicators (KPIs) such as cycle time and throughput serve as primary monitoring tools, offering quantifiable measures of and . Cycle time represents the duration required to complete one production cycle, helping to identify bottlenecks and streamline processes. Throughput measures the rate of production output over a specified period, indicating overall system capacity and aiding in resource optimization. Dashboards aggregate these KPIs into visual interfaces for quick assessment, while compares planned versus actual performance to pinpoint discrepancies in time, cost, or output. This calculates differences between budgeted or standard targets and realized results, enabling managers to investigate root causes and enhance decision-making. Adjustment methods focus on corrective responses to disruptions, such as machine breakdowns, which can halt operations and require schedule revisions. Rescheduling updates the original production plan by incorporating effects, using strategies like right-shifting operations or partial regeneration of affected segments to minimize delays. For instance, in environments, rescheduling for machine failures involves right-shifting affected operations to restore feasibility while preserving as much of the baseline as possible. Feedback loops integrate statistical tools like Shewhart control charts to monitor process stability and trigger adjustments. These charts plot process data against control limits (typically ±3 standard deviations), distinguishing random variations from assignable causes that necessitate intervention, such as operator corrections or machine recalibrations. In feedback systems, out-of-control signals from the charts prompt real-time actions to maintain and . Specific techniques enhance these adjustments, including dispatching rules and . Dispatching rules prioritize job sequencing at workstations; the shortest processing time (SPT) rule, for example, assigns priority to jobs with the minimal estimated duration, effectively reducing average production lead times in multi-stage systems. SPT outperforms alternatives like first-in-first-out in studies by minimizing queue buildup and improving flow. supports what-if scenarios by replicating production environments to test potential changes, such as altered resource allocations or demand shifts, without risking real operations. Using software, planners can verify finite capacity constraints, optimize resource utilization, and evaluate outcomes like delivery times under various conditions. This approach allows comparison of strategies, including planning horizons and re-planning frequencies, to select robust options. Overall, these techniques ensure production plans remain dynamic, adapting to variances and disruptions while referencing baselines like MRP schedules for ongoing alignment. By fostering continuous improvement, they enhance operational resilience and performance in manufacturing settings.

Quality and Inventory Control

Quality control in production planning ensures that manufactured goods meet predefined standards, minimizing defects and rework while integrating seamlessly with overall operational processes. Total Quality Management (TQM), a holistic approach emphasizing continuous improvement, customer satisfaction, and employee involvement, is widely integrated into production planning to foster a culture of quality at every stage, from design to delivery. Originating from the works of pioneers like W. Edwards Deming, Joseph M. Juran, and Armand V. Feigenbaum, TQM shifts focus from inspection-based quality to prevention through process optimization, thereby reducing variability and enhancing planning efficiency in manufacturing environments. A key technique within quality control is Statistical Process Control (SPC), which uses control charts to monitor process variations in real-time during production. Developed by in the 1920s, SPC establishes upper and lower control limits typically set at ±3 standard deviations (σ) from the process mean, allowing planners to distinguish between variation (inherent to the process) and special cause variation (due to external factors), enabling timely interventions to maintain standards. For instance, if measurements exceed these limits, production schedules may be adjusted to investigate root causes, preventing widespread defects and aligning output with planning forecasts. Inventory control complements quality efforts by managing stock levels to avoid disruptions that could compromise production quality, such as rushed orders leading to errors. The (EOQ) model, introduced by Ford W. Harris in 1913, determines the optimal order size that minimizes total costs by balancing ordering and holding expenses. The formula is given by: Q=2DSHQ = \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{H}}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.