Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Project Bacchus
Project Bacchus
Comunity Hub
History
arrow-down
starMore
arrow-down
bob

Bob

Have a question related to this hub?

bob

Alice

Got something to say related to this hub?
Share it here.

#general is a chat channel to discuss anything related to the hub.
Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Project Bacchus
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Project Bacchus Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Project Bacchus. The purpose of the hub is to connect p...
Add your contribution
Project Bacchus

Project Bacchus was a covert investigation by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency to determine whether it is possible to construct a bioweapons production facility with off-the-shelf equipment.

History

[edit]

The project

[edit]

Project Bacchus operated from 1999 to 2000 to investigate whether would-be terrorists could build an anthrax production facility and remain undetected.[1] During the two-year simulation, the facility was constructed, and successfully produced an anthrax-like bacterium.[2] The participating scientists were able to make about 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) of highly refined bacterial particles.[2]

Reportage

[edit]

The secret Project Bacchus was disclosed in a September 2001 article in The New York Times.[1] Reporters Judith Miller, Stephen Engelberg and William J. Broad collaborated on the article.[1] Shortly after it appeared, they published a book containing further details.[1] The book, Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War, and the article are the only publicly available sources[citation needed] concerning Project Bacchus and its sister projects, Clear Vision and Jefferson.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e Enemark, Christian. Disease and Security: Natural Plagues and Biological Weapons in East Asia, (Google Books), Routledge, 2007, pp. 173-75, (ISBN 0415422345).
  2. ^ a b MacKenzie, Debora. Anthrax in Florida and New York "the same strain"", New Scientist, October 18, 2001. Retrieved January 6, 2009.

Further reading

[edit]