Hubbry Logo
Stem rustStem rustMain
Open search
Stem rust
Community hub
Stem rust
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Stem rust
Stem rust
from Wikipedia

Stem rust
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Basidiomycota
Class: Pucciniomycetes
Order: Pucciniales
Family: Pucciniaceae
Genus: Puccinia
Species:
P. graminis
Binomial name
Puccinia graminis
Pers., (1794)
Synonyms

See § Synonyms

Stem rust, also known as cereal rust, black rust,[1][2] red rust or red dust,[3] is caused by the fungus Puccinia graminis, which causes significant disease in cereal crops. Crop species that are affected by the disease include bread wheat, durum wheat, barley and triticale.[1] These diseases have affected cereal farming throughout history. The annual recurrence of stem rust of wheat in North Indian plains was discovered by K. C. Mehta.[4] Since the 1950s, wheat strains bred to be resistant to stem rust have become available.[5] Fungicides effective against stem rust are available as well.[6]

In 1999 a new, more virulent race of stem rust was identified against which most current wheat strains show no resistance. The race was named TTKSK (e.g. isolate Ug99). An epidemic of stem rust on wheat caused by race TTKSK spread across Africa, Asia and the Middle East, causing major concern due to the large numbers of people dependent on wheat for sustenance, thus threatening global food security.[7]

An outbreak of another virulent race of stem rust, TTTTF, took place in Sicily in 2016, suggesting that the disease is returning to Europe.[5] Comprehensive genomic analysis of Puccinia graminis, combined with plant pathology and climate data, has pointed out the potential of the re-emergence of stem wheat rust in UK.[8][9]

History

[edit]

The fungal ancestors of stem rust have infected grasses for millions of years and wheat crops for as long as they have been grown.[7] According to Jim Peterson, professor of wheat breeding and genetics at Oregon State University, "Stem rust destroyed more than 20% of U.S. wheat crops several times between 1917 and 1935, and losses reached 9% twice in the 1950s," with the last U.S. outbreak in 1962 destroying 5.2% of the crop.[7]

Stem rust has been an ongoing problem dating back to Aristotle's time (384–322 BC). An early ancient practice by the Romans was one where they would sacrifice red animals, such as foxes, dogs, and cows, to Robigus (fem. Robigo), the rust god. They would perform this ritual in the spring during a festival known as the Robigalia in hopes of the wheat crop being spared from the destruction caused by the rust. Weather records from that time have been reexamined and it has been speculated that the fall of the Roman Empire was due to a string of rainy seasons in which the rust would have been more harsh, resulting in reduced wheat harvests. Laws banning barberry were established in 1660 in Rouen, France. This was due to the fact that European farmers noticed a correlation between barberry and stem rust epidemics in wheat. The law banned the planting of barberry near wheat fields and was the first of its kind.[2]

The parasitic nature of stem rust was discovered in the 1700s. Two Italian scientists, Fontana and Tozzetti, first explained the stem rust fungus in wheat in 1767.[2] Italian scientist Giuseppe Maria Giovene (1753–1837), in his work Lettera al dottor Cosimo Moschettini sulla ruggine, also thoroughly studied the stem rust.[10] Thirty years later it received its name, Puccinia graminis, by Persoon, and in 1854 brothers Louis René and Charles Tulasne discovered the characteristic five-spore stage that is known in some stem rust species. The brothers were also able to make a connection between the red (urediniospore) and black (teliospore) spores as different stages within the life cycle of the same organism, but the rest of the stages remained unknown.[2]

Anton de Bary later conducted experiments to observe the beliefs of European farmers regarding the relationship between the rust and barberry plants, and after connecting the basidiospores of the basidia stage to barberry, he also identified that the aeciospores in the aecia stage reinfect the wheat host. Upon de Bary's discovery of all five spore stages and their need for barberry as a host, John Craigie, a Canadian pathologist, identified the function of the spermogonium in 1927.[2]

Due to the useful nature of both barberry and wheat plants, they were eventually brought to North America by European colonists. Barberry was used for many things like making wine and jams from the berries to tool handles from the wood. Ultimately, as they did in Europe, the colonists began to notice a relationship between barberry and stem rust epidemics in wheat. Laws were enacted in many New England colonies, but as the farmers moved west, the problem with stem rust moved with them and began to spread to many areas, creating a devastating epidemic in 1916. It was not until two years later in 1918 that the United States created a program to remove barberry. The program was one that was supported by state and federal entities and was partly prompted by the threat it posed to food supplies during World War I. The "war against barberries" was waged and called upon the help of citizens through radio and newspaper advertisements, pamphlets, and fair booths asking for help from all in the attempt to rid the barberry bushes of their existence. Later, in 1975–1980, the program was reestablished under state jurisdiction. Once this happened, a federal quarantine was established against the sale of stem rust susceptible barberry in those states that were part of the program. A barberry testing program was created to ensure that only those species and varieties of barberry that are immune to stem rust will be grown in the quarantine area.[2]

In 1969 two races not detected before in Australia were found[11] and for decades one hypothesis was an African origin,[11][12] and in 2018 DNA analysis confirmed that,[12] specifically South African.[11]

South Africa itself has an ongoing problem with various stem rust outbreaks which requires better response, including an indigenous breeding for resistance program.[12]

Taxonomy

[edit]
Model of a spore, late 19th century, Botanical Museum Greifswald

There is considerable genetic diversity within the species P. graminis, and several special forms, forma specialis, which vary in host range have been identified.

P. graminis is a member of the phylum Basidiomycota within the kingdom Fungi. The characteristic rust color on stems and leaves is typical of a general stem rust as well as any variation of this type of fungus. Different from most fungi, the rust variations have five spore stages and alternate between two hosts. Wheat is the primary host, and barberry is the alternate host.[citation needed]

The rust is sometimes termed "red rust" or "red dust"[3][16] owing to the spores on the leaf surfaces that range from orange to dark-red in color. Later, the spores change and become dark in color, which gives rise to another common name, "black rust".[17][2]

Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici

[edit]

The North American race nomenclature system[18][19][20] was introduced in 1988 by Roelfs and Martens.[21] This nomenclature is a series of letters each of which indicate virulence/avirulence against one resistance gene, as diagnosed by performance against a group of cultivars known to bear that gene.

Ug99

[edit]

Pgt contains many races of wheat diseases, including some of the most significant in the world. Ug99 began as a race (TTKSK) of Pgt and now has proliferated into a large number of races of its own.[citation needed]

The virulent new race, against which most current wheat strains show no resistance, was identified in 1999. The race was named TTKSK (e.g. isolate Ug99), named after the country where it was identified (Uganda) and the year of its discovery (1999). It spread to Kenya, then Ethiopia, Sudan and Yemen, and becomes more virulent as it spreads. An epidemic of stem rust on wheat caused by race TTKSK spread across Africa, Asia and the Middle East, causing major concern due to the large numbers of people dependent on wheat for sustenance,[7] thus threatening global food security. In 2011, after it had spread into southern Africa, the Bill Gates Foundation donated $40 million towards research into Ug99, to be spent on critical infrastructure in Africa.[3] Scientists are working on breeding strains of wheat that are resistant to UG99. However, wheat is grown in a broad range of environments. This means that breeding programs would have extensive work remaining to get resistance into regionally adapted germplasms even after resistance is identified.[7] Similarly, in 2014, a Ug99 race called "Digalu" emerged and devastated the Digalu variety in Ethiopia.[22]: 25 

JRCQC

[edit]

JRCQC is a race affecting Durum in Ethiopia.[23]

MCC

[edit]

Affects barley.[14]

QCC

[edit]

Affects barley.[14][15]

Successfully overwintered in Kansas in 1989/90, and in Texas and Kansas in 1990/91, and so was expected to thereafter be a permanent part of the North American Pg population. Further pathogen adaptation, resulting in widening of the host range, is expected.[24]

QCCJ
[edit]

Synonymous with QCCJB[15] or known as QCC-2 by some classifications.

Most common Pg race in 1991 in the United States, 68% of all Pg samples, and 67% in 1990. Afflicted spring-sown barley in the northern Great Plains in 1990. Was the first barley stem rust to show up in the United States in 1991, in southern Texas in Uvalde. Thought to be responsible for rusting of wild Hordea in the Midwestern United States and Great Plains, and overall was 94% of Pgs on Hordea in 1991. 67% of QCCJ was from barley and 95% of Pg on barley was QCCJ. On wheat, QCCJ was still the most common race but only at 38% of Pg. Continues to threaten barley in the Red River Valley in North Dakota and Minnesota. Higher than normal inoculum production in South Central Oklahoma and the adjacent part of North Texas before the 1991 season resulted in an epidemic in North Central and northwestern Kansas.[24] Virulent against barley bearing Rpg1. Down to 26% of Pgs afflicting wheat in the US in 1995, 1% in 1996, and not at all in 1997 or 1998. Not found on barley in 1997 but found again in 1998.[25]

QCCJB
[edit]

The first QCC race (since renamed QCCJ or QCCJB) was detected in the northwest Great Plains in 1988, and by 1990 was over 90% of Pgs on barley in the United States.[15] Also afflicted wheat until a mass switch away from vulnerable cultivars resulted in complete absence in 1997 or 1998.[25][15] Barley virulence is temperature-sensitive: from 18–20 °C (64–68 °F) rpg4 and Rpg5 are highly effective, but above 27 °C (81 °F) they are ineffective. Not necessarily distinguishable from QCCJ, used synonymously by some practitioners.[15]

QCCS
[edit]

Found in the US on wheat in 1997 and 1998 – but only in the West across both years. On barley in 1997 but not 1998.[25]

QFCS

[edit]

25% of Pgs on wheat in 1991. Traces found growing in northwest Illinois fields, also in 1991.[24] 8% of all Pgs on wheat, barley, and oat in the US in 1997, and 31% in 1998. Displaced the previously dominant TPMK suddenly in 1998.[25]

TPMK

[edit]

36% of Pg samples from wheat in 1991 in the United States. Unusually severe in southern Illinois in the first week of June, and in west central Indiana, in 1991.[24] TPMK was the worst at 69% of Pgs on wheat in 1997 in the United States – being absent only from the southern Great Plains and the west, but then was down to 10% in 1998. In the upper Great Plains it was already declining – to 26% of samples in 1997, and 12% in 1998. In the most fertile areas of the eastern US it was 96% of Pgs in 1997 but then suddenly fell to 29% in 1998. In a few other locations in the US, and overall across the US, this race declined 97–98 in favor of other races, and not because of overall Pg decline.[25]

Synonyms

[edit]

As listed by Species Fungorum;[26]

  • Aecidium berberidis Pers. ex J.F. Gmel., Syst. Nat., Edn 13 2(2): 1473 (1792)
  • Aecidium berberidis var. cyathiforme Rebent., Prodr. fl. neomarch. (Berolini): 352 (1804)
  • Aecidium berberidis var. cylindricum Rebent., Prodr. fl. neomarch. (Berolini): 352, tab. 3:11a-b (1804)
  • Caeoma berberidis (Pers. ex J.F. Gmel.) Schltdl., Fl. berol. (Berlin) 2: 112 (1824)
  • Dicaeoma anthistiriae (Barclay) Syd., Annls mycol. 20(3/4): 117 (1922)
  • Dicaeoma anthoxanthi (Fuckel) Kuntze, Revis. gen. pl. (Leipzig) 3(3): 467 (1898)
  • Dicaeoma graminis (Pers.) Gray, Nat. Arr. Brit. Pl. (London) 1: 542 (1821)
  • Dicaeoma phlei-pratensis (Erikss. & Henn.) Kuntze, Revis. gen. pl. (Leipzig) 3(3): 470 (1898)
  • Dicaeoma vilis (Arthur) Arthur, Résult. Sci. Congr. Bot. Wien 1905: 344 (1906)
  • Epitea dactylidis G.H. Otth, Mitt. naturf. Ges. Bern 531-552: 88 (1864)
  • Lycoperdon berberidis C.-J. Duval, in Hoppe, Bot. Taschenb.: 257 (1793)
  • Puccinia albigensis Mayor, Revue Mycol., Paris 22(3): 278 (1957)
  • Puccinia anthistiriae Barclay, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, Pt. 2, Nat. Sci. 58: 246 (1889)
  • Puccinia anthoxanthi Fuckel, Jb. nassau. Ver. Naturk. 27-28: 15 (1874)
  • Puccinia brizae-maximae T.S. Ramakr., Indian Phytopath. 6: 30 (1954)
  • Puccinia cerealis H. Mart., Prodr. Fl. Mosq., Edn 2: 227 (1817)
  • Puccinia culmorum Schumach., Enum. pl. (Kjbenhavn) 2: 233 (1801)
  • Puccinia dactylidis G.H. Otth, Mitt. naturf. Ges. Bern 531-552: 88 (1864)
  • Puccinia dactylidis Gäum., Ber. schweiz. bot. Ges. 55: 79 (1945)
  • Puccinia elymina Miura, Flora of Manchuria and East Mongolia, III Cryptogams, Fungi (Industr. Contr. S. Manch. Rly 27): 283 (1928)
  • Puccinia favargeri Mayor, Revue Mycol., Paris 22(3): 273 (1957)
  • Puccinia graminis f. macrospora Baudyš, Lotos 64: 29 (1916)
  • Puccinia graminis subsp. graminicola Z. Urb., Česká Mykol. 21(1): 14 (1967)
  • Puccinia graminis subsp. major A.L. Guyot, Massenot & Saccas, Annales de l'École Nationale d'Agriculture de Grignon, sér. 3 5: 142 (1946)
  • Puccinia graminis var. phlei-pratensis (Erikss. & Henn.) Stakman & Piem., J. Agric. Res., Washington 10: 433 (1917)
  • Puccinia graminis var. stakmanii A.L. Guyot, Massenot & Saccas, Ann. Ec. Agric. Grignon 5: 145 (1946)
  • Puccinia graminis var. stakmanii A.L. Guyot, Massenot & Saccas ex Z. Urb., Česká Mykol. 21(1): 14 (1967)
  • Puccinia graminis var. tritici A.L. Guyot, Massenot & Saccas, Annales de l'École Nationale d'Agriculture de Grignon, sér. 3 5: 145 (1946)
  • Puccinia jubata Ellis & Barthol., Erythea 4: 2 (1896)
  • Puccinia linearis Röhl., Deutschl. Fl. (Frankfurt) 3(3): 132 (1813)
  • Puccinia megalopotamica Speg., Anal. Mus. nac. Hist. nat. B. Aires 6: 224 (1898)
  • Puccinia phlei-pratensis Erikss. & Henn., Z. PflKrankh. 4: 140 (1894)
  • Puccinia vilis Arthur, Bull. Torrey bot. Club 28: 663 (1901)
  • Roestelia berberidis (Pers. ex J.F. Gmel.) Gray, Nat. Arr. Brit. Pl. (London) 1: 534 (1821)
  • Uredo frumenti Sowerby, Col. fig. Engl. Fung. Mushr. (London) 2(no. 13): tab. 140 (1799)

Pathology

[edit]

The stem rust fungus attacks the parts of the plant that are above ground. Spores that land on green wheat plants form a pustule that invades the outer layers of the stalk.[7] Infected plants produce fewer tillers and set fewer seed, and in cases of severe infection the plant may die. Infection can reduce what is an apparently healthy crop about three weeks before harvest into a black tangle of broken stems and shriveled grains by harvest.[1]

Stem rust of cereals causes yield losses in several ways:[2]

  • Fungus absorbs nutrients that would otherwise be used for grain development.
  • Pustules break through epidermis, which disrupt the plant's control of transpiration and can lead to desiccation and infection by other fungi.
  • Interference with plant vascular tissue leads to shriveled grains.
  • The fungus weakens the stems, which can lead to lodging (falling over). In severe cases lodging can make mechanical harvesting impossible.

Signs and symptoms

[edit]

On wheat

[edit]
Race differential (Infected and uninfected leaves, depending on specific resistance genes)
Race differential (Infected and uninfected depending on specific resistance genes)

Stem rust on wheat is characterized by the presence of uredinia on the plant, which are brick-red, elongated, blister-like pustules that are easily shaken off. They most frequently occur on the leaf sheaths, but are also found on stems, leaves, glumes and awns. On leaves they develop mostly on the underside but may penetrate to the upperside. On leaf sheaths and glumes pustules rupture the epidermis, giving a ragged appearance.[1]

Towards the end of the growing season black telia are produced. For this reason stem rust is also known as "black rust". The telia are firmly attached to the plant tissue.[1]

The site of infection is a visible symptom of the disease.

On barberry

[edit]

Pycnia appear on barberry plants in the spring, usually in the upper leaf surfaces. They are often in small clusters and exude pycniospores in a sticky honeydew. Five to ten days later, cup-shaped structures filled with orange-yellow, powdery aeciospores break through the lower leaf surface. The aecial cups are yellow and sometimes elongate to extend up to 5 millimetres (1364 in) from the leaf surface.[2] So important is its role in maintenance of prevalence that since the near extermination of the alternate host from the northern Great Plains in the United States, epidemics in crops have become rare.[24]

Life cycle

[edit]

Like other Puccinia species, P. graminis is an obligate biotroph (it colonizes living plant cells) and has a complex life cycle[27] featuring alternation of generations. The fungus is heteroecious, requiring two hosts to complete its life cycle – the cereal host and the alternate host.[2] There are many species in Berberis and Mahonia (and their hybrid genus x Mahoberberis) that are susceptible to stem rust, but the common barberry (B. vulgaris) is considered to be the most important alternate host.[1] P. graminis is macrocyclic[2] (exhibits all five of the spore types that are known for rust fungi[28]).

P. graminis can complete its life cycle either with or without barberry (the alternate host).[2]

P. g. tritici's obligately biotrophic lifestyle involves the dramatic up-regulation of particular gene transcriptions, constituting its biotrophy genomic features. These genomic regions have parallels in other eukaryotic plant pathogens. These parallels – between these independently evolved and unrelated sets of genes – show a strong and broad pattern of convergent evolution around the plant pathogenic lifestyle.[29]

Life cycle on barberry

[edit]

Due to its cyclical nature, there is no true 'start point' for this process. Here, the production of urediniospores is arbitrarily chosen as a start point.

Urediniospores are formed in structures called uredinia, which are produced by fungal mycelia on the cereal host 1–2 weeks after infection. The urediniospores are dikaryotic (contain two un-fused, haploid nuclei in one cell) and are formed on individual stalks within the uredinium. They are spiny and brick-red. Urediniospores are the only type of spores in the rust fungus life cycle that are capable of infecting the host on which they are produced, and this is therefore referred to as the 'repeating stage' of the life cycle. It is the spread of urediniospores that allows infection to spread from one cereal plant to another.[2] This phase can rapidly spread the infection over a wide area.

Towards the end of the cereal host's growing season, the mycelia produce structures called telia. Telia produce a type of spore called teliospores. These black, thick-walled spores are dikaryotic. They are the only form in which Puccinia graminis is able to overwinter independently of a host.[2]

Each teliospore undergoes karyogamy (fusion of nuclei) and meiosis to form four haploid spores called basidiospores. This is an important source of genetic recombination in the life cycle. Basidiospores are thin-walled and colourless. They cannot infect the cereal host, but can infect the alternative host (barberry).[2] They are usually carried to the alternative host by wind.

Once basidiospores arrive on a leaf of the alternative host, they germinate to produce a mycelium (which is haploid) that directly penetrates the epidermis and colonises the leaf. Once inside the leaf the mycelium produces specialised infection structures called pycnia. The pycnia produce two types of haploid gametes, the pycniospores and the receptive hyphae. The pycniospores are produced in a sticky honeydew that attracts insects. The insects carry pycniospores from one leaf to another. Splashing raindrops can also spread pycniospores. A pycniospore can fertilise a receptive hypha of the opposite mating type, leading to the production of a mycelium that is dikaryotic. This is the sexual stage of the life cycle and cross-fertilisation provides an important source of genetic recombination.[2]

This dikaryotic mycelium then forms structures called aecia, which produce a type of dikaryotic spores called aeciospores. These have a worty appearance and are formed in chains – unlike the urediniospores that are spiny and are produced on individual stalks. The chains of aeciospores are surrounded by a bell-like enclosure of fungal cells. The aeciospores are able to germinate on the cereal host but not on the alternative host (they are produced on the alternative host, which is usually barberry). They are carried by wind to the cereal host where they germinate and the germ tubes penetrate into the plant. The fungus grows inside the plant as a dikaryotic mycelium. Within 1–2 weeks the mycelium produces uredinia and the cycle is complete.[2]

Life cycle without barberry

[edit]

Since the urediniospores are produced on the cereal host and can infect the cereal host, it is possible for the infection to pass from one year's crop to the next without infecting the alternate host (barberry). For example, infected volunteer wheat plants can serve as a bridge from one growing season to another. In other cases the fungus passes between winter wheat and spring wheat, meaning that it has a cereal host all year round. Since the urediniospores are wind dispersed, this can occur over large distances.[2] Note that this cycle consists simply of vegetative propagation – urediniospores infect one wheat plant, leading to the production of more urediniospores that then infect other wheat plants.

Spore dispersal

[edit]

Puccinia graminis produces all five of the spore types that are known for rust fungi.[2]

Spores are typically deposited close to the source, but long-distance dispersal is also well documented[1] commonly out to hundreds of kilometres/miles.[30] The following three categories of long-distance dispersal are known to occur:[1]

  • Extremely long-distance dispersal

This can occur unassisted (the robust nature of the spores allows them to be carried long distances in the air and then deposited by rain-scrubbing) or assisted (typically on human clothing or infected plant material that is transported between regions).[1] This type of dispersal is rare and is very difficult to predict.[1] This is especially known to rarely occur across thousands of km/mi from South Africa to Western Australia.[31][32]

  • Step-wise range expansion

This is probably the most common mode of long-distance dispersal and usually occurs within a country or region.[1]

  • Extinction and recolonisation

This occurs in areas that have unsuitable conditions for year-round survival of Puccinia graminis – typically temperate regions where hosts are absent during either the winter or summer.[1] Spores overwinter or oversummer in another region and then recolonise when conditions are favorable.[1]

Wheat stem rust resistance genes

[edit]

A number of stem rust resistance genes (Sr genes) have been identified in wheat.[33] Some of them arose in bread wheat (e.g. Sr5 and Sr6), while others have been bred in from other wheat species (e.g. Sr21 from T. monococcum) or from other members of the tribe Triticeae (e.g. Sr31 from rye[22]: 15  and Sr44 from Thinopyrum intermedium).

None of the Sr genes provide resistance to all races of stem rust. For instance many of them are ineffective against the Ug99 lineage.[34] Notably Ug99 has virulence against Sr31, which was effective against all previous stem rust races. Recently, a new stem rust resistance gene Sr59 from Secale cereale was introgressed into wheat, which provides an additional asset for wheat improvement to mitigate yield losses caused by stem rust. Singh et al. (2011) provide a list of known Sr genes and their effectiveness against Ug99.[34]

There has been significant uptake of resistant wheat varieties among Ethiopian farmers since 2014[35][36] – a great deal of which is thanks to CGIAR and CIMMYT (the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center).[37][36]

Although Sr5, Sr21, Sr9e, Sr7b, Sr11, Sr6, Sr8a, Sr9g, Sr9b, Sr30, Sr17, Sr9a, Sr9d, Sr10, SrTmp, Sr38, and SrMcN are no longer effective in Lebanon, Sr11, Sr24, and Sr31 still are which is diagnostic for the presence of various races of stem rust – but the complete absence of Ug99 specifically – from Lebanon.[38]

Sr9h

[edit]

Discovered and found to provide Ug99 resistance by Rouse et al., 2014.[22]: 24  However Ug99 isolates from South Africa and Zimbabwe, both in 2010, already had virulence when retested against this new gene.[22]: 24  Both Rouse and Wessels et al., 2019 find the Ug99 resistance of cv. 'Matlabas' is probably due to this gene. Wessels finds it is present in less than 5% of breeding lines.[39]

Sr14

[edit]

Sr14 does not protect seedlings against TTKSK[40] but does provide moderate resistance at later stages.[40] It is effective against TTKST.[40]

Sr22

[edit]

There is considerable variation among Sr22 alleles, with some conferring resistance and some susceptibility.[41]

Sr27

[edit]

Sr27[42] is originally from rye[33] (Imperial Rye),[43] now (as of 2021) widely found in triticale and rarely in hexaploid wheat.[44] Located on the 3A chromosome arm,[42] originally from 3R.[45] Virulence has been observed in field Pgs and in an artificial Pgt  ×  Pgs.[43] When successful, Sr27 is among the few Srs that does not allow the underdeveloped uredinia and slight degree of sporulation commonly allowed by most Srs.[33] Instead there are necrotic or chlorotic flecks.[46] Pgt virulent on wheat with this gene was found in Kenya in 1972.[45] Deployment in triticale in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia, rapidly produced virulence between 1982 and 1984 – the first virulence on this gene in the world.[47][33][45] (This was especially associated with the cultivar Coorong.)[47][48] Therefore, CIMMYT's triticale offerings were tested and many were found to depend solely on Sr27.[48][45] Four years later, in 1988, virulence was found in South Africa. Sr27 has become less common in CIMMYT triticales since the mid-'80s.[45]

Sr31

[edit]

Ug99 is virulent against Sr31, which was effective against all previous stem rust races.[34]

Sr33

[edit]

An introgression from a wild wheat Aegilops tauschii orthologous to Mla in barley. Confers broad resistance to multiple races including Ug99.[49][30]

Sr35

[edit]

Sr35 is an introgression from Triticum monococcum conferring some resistance.[30] AvrSr35 – a Pgt gene so named because it was discovered causing avirulence on Sr35 – is the ancestral allele to all Pgt alleles that are virulent on Sr35. AvrSr35 came first, followed by the selective pressure of widespread adoption of Sr35 wheat races, followed by the evolution of virulence on Sr35 by way of nonfunctionalization mutations of AvrSr35.[50]

Sr59

[edit]

Recently, a new stem rust resistance gene Sr59 from Secale cereale was introgressed into wheat, which provides an additional asset for wheat improvement to mitigate yield losses caused by stem rust.[34]

Sr62

[edit]

An NLR (or NB-LRR, or R gene) from Aegilops sharonensis, one of only three resistance genes from that species.[51] Was discovered by Yu et al., 2017 and then introgressed into hexaploid by Millet et al., 2017.[51] Sr62 encodes for a unique tandem protein kinase which is composed of domains which are common among plants.[51] Yu et al., 2022 [51]

SrTmp

[edit]

Originally from the widespread Ethiopian 'Digalu'.[52] Resistant to Ug99, susceptible to § TKTTF.[52]

Weaponization

[edit]

In the 1950s, the United States Air Force developed Operation Steelyard, a plan to drop wheat stem rust mixed with feathers over wheat farms in the Soviet Union. If the plan were enacted, Boeing B-29 Superfortress bombers would drop 500-pound M115 bombs over Soviet farms, with the intention of destroying up to 50% of the Soviet winter wheat harvest.[53]

Future

[edit]

Alone amongst cereals, rice is naturally immune to rusts. If a genetic source of this resistance could be identified, transgenic wheats with rice as the gene donor could be the future.[54][55]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Stem rust, also known as black rust, is a destructive fungal disease primarily affecting (Triticum aestivum) and other small grains such as , oats, and , caused by the obligate parasitic Puccinia graminis. The pathogen produces characteristic brick-red uredinial pustules on stems, leaves, and inflorescences, which rupture plant tissues and release spores that spread via , often leading to rapid epidemics in humid, temperate environments. Puccinia graminis exhibits substantial genetic variation, enabling adaptation to host resistances through mutation and recombination, with the wheat-specific form P. graminis f. sp. tritici responsible for the most severe impacts on global wheat production. The follows a complex heteroecious life cycle, completing sexual reproduction on alternate hosts like common barberry (), which facilitates via pycnia and aecia, while asexual uredinial stages drive explosive field epidemics on cereals. Historical epidemics illustrate its economic toll, including the 1916 North American outbreak that obliterated nearly 300 million bushels of and recurrent devastations in the 1930s and 1950s across the . Yield losses can approach 100% in susceptible cultivars under optimal conditions, threatening in major wheat-producing regions. Management depends on deploying resistant varieties, fungicides, and eradicating barberry, yet virulent races like Ug99, detected in 1998, evade many resistances and underscore the pathogen's evolutionary agility.

Causative Agent and Pathology

Taxonomy and Classification

Puccinia graminis is the basionym for the fungal species responsible for stem rust, formally described by Christiaan Hendrik Persoon as a member of the rust fungi. The species belongs to the genus Puccinia, which encompasses over 3,000 described rust species characterized by their obligate parasitic lifestyle on plants. Its full taxonomic hierarchy places it within the Kingdom Fungi, Phylum Basidiomycota, Class Pucciniomycetes, Order Pucciniales, Family Pucciniaceae, Genus Puccinia, and Species P. graminis. This classification reflects its basidiomycetous nature, including dikaryotic hyphae and spore stages typical of rust fungi, with updates from earlier groupings under Urediniomycetes and Uredinales based on molecular phylogenetics. Infraspecific recognizes physiological forms (formae speciales, abbreviated f. sp.) adapted to specific grass hosts via host-specific patterns, a system formalized in rust pathology to denote pathotypes without implying formal rank. The P. graminis f. sp. tritici targets (Triticum spp.) and , driving major epidemics; f. sp. avenae affects oats ( spp.); f. sp. hordei infects ( spp.); and others like f. sp. secalis on ( spp.) or f. sp. poae on various grasses. These distinctions arise from genetic specialization in effector genes enabling host compatibility, confirmed through rDNA sequencing and assays on differential host lines. Such categorization aids breeding resistant cultivars, as races within f. sp. tritici (e.g., Ug99 variants) evolve rapidly via and recombination.

Pathogen Characteristics

Puccinia graminis is an obligate biotrophic fungus that derives all nutrients from living host cells via specialized haustoria formed from haustorial mother cells, which invaginate the host cell wall and are surrounded by an extrahaustorial membrane. Its mycelium consists of intercellular, septate hyphae that are predominantly dikaryotic (binucleate) during the pathogenic phase on grasses, enabling repeated asexual reproduction. As a macrocyclic, heteroecious rust fungus, it completes its full life cycle across two host types—graminaceous plants for asexual stages and barberry (Berberis spp.) for sexual recombination—exhibiting broad host specificity across approximately 365 grass species in 54 genera, though formae speciales like f. sp. tritici primarily target wheat and related cereals. The produces five spore morphotypes, each adapted for specific roles in dispersal and survival, with dikaryotic dominating the phase. Urediniospores, the chief asexual propagules on hosts, are dikaryotic, brick-red, stalked, and typically long-ellipsoidal to subcylindrical in shape with echinulate (spiny) walls and equatorial germ pores; they enable rapid cycles of infection every 14–20 days under favorable conditions. Teliospores, formed late in the season in linear telia, are dikaryotic, two-celled, thick-walled, and dark brown to black, functioning as resilient overwintering structures that undergo to produce haploid basidiospores upon germination. Aeciospores, dikaryotic and produced in chain-like aecia on barberry, are adapted for wind dispersal to grasses, while pycniospores (haploid spermatia) and basidiospores facilitate on the alternate host. P. graminis demonstrates high adaptability through physiological races differentiated by on host resistance genes, with urediniospore morphology varying slightly by (e.g., larger in ssp. graminis versus ssp. graminicola), though DNA analyses confirm limited overall. Its obligate nature precludes axenic culture, necessitating host-dependent propagation, and it thrives in temperate climates where teliospores persist through winter, initiating epidemics via infection of barberry when present.

Symptoms and Detection

Manifestations on Wheat and Cereals


Stem rust, caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici on wheat, manifests primarily through the formation of uredinia, which appear as oval, erumpent pustules containing brick-red urediniospores on stems, leaf sheaths, and occasionally leaf blades or glumes. These pustules typically emerge 7 to 15 days post-infection, producing powdery masses that resemble rust spots on weathered iron, with the emerging spores tearing host tissue and giving pustules a characteristic frayed or torn margin visible on both sides of affected plant parts.
In advanced stages, particularly toward the end of the growing season, uredinial production halts, and telia form as elongated, blackish pustules filled with two-celled teliospores, which overwinter on crop residues and serve as sources for basidiospores in the following spring. These telia are more prominent on stems and sheaths, contributing to the disease's common designation as "black rust" in its dormant phase. On other cereals such as barley, oats, and rye, symptoms are analogous, with uredinia appearing on stems and sheaths, though infection severity varies by host susceptibility and pathogen race; for instance, P. graminis f. sp. avenae targets oats specifically.
Early detection relies on scouting for these distinctive pustules, as infections often start on lower plant parts before spreading upward, potentially covering extensive stem surfaces under favorable cool, moist conditions that promote spore germination and penetration via stomata. Severe manifestations can lead to visible weakening and lodging of culms due to girdling effects from coalescing lesions, though primary identification hinges on the spore-filled sorus morphology rather than secondary damage.

Effects on Alternate Hosts

The alternate hosts of Puccinia graminis, predominantly species of the genus such as common barberry (), support the sexual phase of the pathogen's life cycle, with infections typically initiating in early spring from basidiospores derived from overwintered teliospores on graminaceous hosts. These infections first produce pycnia—small, bright yellow-orange spots on the upper surfaces of leaves and occasionally young twigs or fruit—exuding a sticky, nectar-like fluid containing pycniospores that promote through cross-fertilization between compatible . Upon successful fertilization, flask- or cup-shaped aecia erupt from the lower leaf surfaces, rupturing the and releasing abundant orange aeciospores that serve as the primary inoculum for infecting nearby crops via wind dispersal. The fungal structures induce localized yellow-red discoloration in adjacent tissue due to host cellular disruption and effects. Severe infections, particularly under favorable cool, moist conditions, can result in extensive aecial coverage leading to premature defoliation, which diminishes and may weaken shrub vigor, though mature Berberis plants rarely suffer mortality or long-term decline from the alone. Aecia may also form on barberry fruit, potentially impairing seed viability, but such occurrences are less common than on foliage. Other Berberis species, including B. thunbergii in some regions, exhibit varying susceptibility, with infections similarly confined to visible aecial symptoms but often at lower intensity due to partial resistance. Overall, while the biological effects on alternate hosts facilitate pathogen perpetuation and , they impose limited direct phytotoxic damage compared to the devastating impacts on primary hosts.

Life Cycle and Epidemiology

Sexual Phase on Barberry

The sexual phase of Puccinia graminis, the causative agent of stem rust, occurs exclusively on barberry species such as , serving as the alternate host where and take place. This phase begins in early spring when s, produced on infected grass hosts the previous season, germinate to form basidia that release haploid basidiospores; these basidiospores, numbering up to four per teliospore, are wind-dispersed and infect young barberry leaves emerging typically in April or May in temperate regions. Upon , the undergoes the pycnial , producing flask-shaped pycnia (spermogonia) on the upper surface of barberry leaves; these structures exude pycniospores, also known as spermatia, which are haploid and segregated into + and - . Fertilization requires the transfer of pycniospores of opposite , often facilitated by such as flies or bees that visit the sweet, nectar-like from pycnia, enabling dikaryotization through and subsequent in the receiving pycnium. This during generates novel pathotypes, increasing the pathogen's adaptability and virulence potential compared to the clonal asexual phases on grasses. Following fertilization, the dikaryotic develops aecia on the lower surface, forming cup-shaped structures filled with chains of aeciospores; these dikaryotic spores are forcibly ejected and wind-dispersed over distances up to several kilometers to infect susceptible crops like (Triticum aestivum), initiating the uredinial stage of the cycle. The entire sexual phase on barberry typically spans 2–3 weeks under optimal cool, moist conditions (10–20°C with high ), after which infected leaves senesce, limiting further aecial production. Absence of barberry in a region suppresses this recombinative step, historically reducing stem rust epidemics, as evidenced by U.S. eradication efforts that eliminated common barberry from over 86% of infested areas by 1940.

Asexual Phases on Grasses

The asexual phases of Puccinia graminis occur exclusively on gramineous hosts, including (Triticum aestivum), (Hordeum vulgare), (Avena sativa), and various wild grasses, enabling repeated cycles of infection and production during the host's . These phases—uredinial and telial—represent dikaryotic reproduction without , contrasting with the sexual stages on barberry, and drive epidemic spread through prolific output. Infection begins when wind-dispersed urediniospores (or rarely basidiospores from the prior sexual phase) germinate on grass leaves, stems, or sheaths under conditions of free water and temperatures between 15–30°C, penetrating via stomata to form subcuticular and haustoria for nutrient uptake. Within 4–6 days post-infection, uredinia emerge as raised, cinnamon-brown to brick-red pustules, each containing thousands of dikaryotic urediniospores measuring 25–30 × 17–22 μm with two germ pores. These spores, lightweight and thick-walled for aerial dispersal over hundreds of kilometers, reinfect susceptible grasses, yielding latent periods of 7–14 days and up to 10–20 generations per season in temperate regions, amplifying density exponentially under warm, humid weather. As host plants senesce in late summer or autumn, typically June–August in northern hemispheres depending on sowing dates, uredinial sorus tissue darkens and erupts into telia—compact, black, waxy crusts up to 1–2 mm long—producing sessile, dikaryotic teliospores in dense layers. Each teliospore, 40–60 × 15–20 μm with thick walls and two cells separated by a poreless septum, functions as an overwintering propagule, germinating after dormancy via promycelial outgrowth under cool, moist conditions to form basidiospores that initiate the sexual phase elsewhere. Teliospore viability persists through winter in plant debris or soil, with germination rates exceeding 50% in controlled studies, though field survival varies with environmental stressors like desiccation. This polycyclic asexual strategy on grasses underpins P. graminis' high evolutionary potential, as mutations in uredinial generations generate pathogenic variants adapting to host resistance genes, with host range spanning over 400 grass species documented in surveys. In regions without barberry, such as Australia or parts of Africa, the cycle relies solely on urediniospore-mediated carryover via infected volunteer plants or southern refugia, sustaining populations without sexual recombination.

Spore Dispersal Mechanisms

Urediniospores, produced in pustules on infected stems and leaves, serve as the primary propagules for spread during the growing season, dispersed predominantly by wind over distances ranging from within fields to thousands of kilometers. These lightweight, dikaryotic spores (typically 25-30 μm in diameter) are released in massive quantities—up to 100,000 per pustule—and can remain viable for weeks under favorable conditions, enabling polycyclic infections that amplify intensity. Long-distance has been documented, such as from to , supported by analysis and dispersal simulations indicating windborne migration across continents. Local dispersal within canopies occurs via and currents, with models showing in spore density beyond 1-2 km from sources. Basidiospores, formed after teliospore on overwintered plant debris or barberry leaves, enable initiation of the sexual cycle and are dispersed short-range primarily by or splash, typically infecting nearby barberry bushes within hundreds of meters. These haploid, unicellular spores (8-12 μm) are forcibly discharged from basidia via a water droplet "buller's drop" mechanism, propelling them into air currents for to receptive barberry pycnia. Their role is limited to localized recombination, contributing minimally to broad epidemics unless barberry is prevalent, as basidiospores lack the longevity and quantity of urediniospores. Aeciospores, generated in aecia on barberry leaves following pycnial fusion, bridge the sexual and asexual phases by dispersing to gramineous hosts and are primarily wind-carried over regional scales, with ejection facilitated by peridial rupture and moisture ingress rather than active propulsion. Models predict aeciospore plumes extending 10-50 km downwind under typical spring winds (5-15 m/s), influenced by spore release timing synchronized with barberry flowering. Pycniospores, produced in nectar-like pycnia on barberry, facilitate genetic exchange through insect-mediated transfer (e.g., by bees) or limited wind splash, but do not directly infect new hosts, confining their dispersal to the alternate host surface. Teliospores themselves are not dispersed but overwinter , germinating to produce basidiospores under moist, cool conditions (near 10°C). Overall, anemochory dominates stem rust , with urediniospore longevity and abundance driving continental outbreaks, while alternate-host spores underscore the pathogen's macrocyclic nature where barberry proximity enhances variability but is often mitigated by eradication programs.

Historical and Economic Impact

Major Epidemics and Outbreaks

One of the most severe stem rust epidemics in occurred in 1916, primarily affecting the Midwest and , where it destroyed approximately 300 million bushels of due to favorable weather conditions and virulent races of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. Subsequent major outbreaks followed in 1935, driven by wind-dispersed urediniospores from southern overwintering sites, resulting in widespread yield losses across the , including up to 56.5% in . Epidemics recurred in 1953 and 1954, though less devastating than prior events due to emerging resistant cultivars, yet still causing significant regional damage before barberry eradication programs curtailed inoculum sources. In Australia, a notable outbreak in 1973 led to wheat production value reductions of 25-35%, highlighting the pathogen's potential for rapid spread in susceptible varieties under humid conditions. Earlier North American events, such as those in 1903 and 1905, contributed to massive grain losses and underscored the disease's historical role in agricultural instability. The emergence of the Ug99 race (TTKSK) in in 1998-1999 marked a contemporary global threat, rapidly spreading to , , , and by the mid-2000s, overcoming key resistance genes like Sr31 and endangering over 80% of global varieties. This lineage has caused recurrent epidemics in regions like , including severe infections in 1993-1994, exacerbating risks in developing wheat-producing areas. While no equivalent scale to the 1916 event has occurred recently in major exporters, Ug99 variants continue to evolve, prompting international surveillance to prevent transcontinental wind dispersal.

Global Agricultural Consequences

Stem rust epidemics have historically inflicted severe yield reductions on global production, with losses exceeding 50% in affected regions such as the Northern Great Plains during the 1930s. , the 1916 outbreak alone resulted in approximately 200 million bushels of destroyed, equivalent to about 40% of the national crop, contributing to billions of dollars in cumulative economic damages through the mid-20th century. These events underscored the pathogen's capacity for rapid devastation under favorable conditions, leading to shriveled grains, weakened stems, and total field failures in susceptible varieties, which amplified food shortages and economic strain in wheat-dependent economies. The emergence of the Ug99 race lineage in around 1998 has posed a renewed transnational threat, spreading to eastern , , , and recently detected in , endangering up to 90% of global varieties lacking effective resistance. This variant's virulence has heightened risks to in vulnerable regions like and parts of , where untreated infections can cause up to 90-100% yield losses, potentially reducing worldwide output by at least 10% and incurring direct economic costs of annually at current prices. Combined with other rusts, stem rust contributes to global annual losses valued at , exacerbating price volatility and import dependencies in developing nations. Overall, nearly 90% of the world's wheat-growing areas face risk from stem rust and related pathogens, with consequences including disrupted supply chains, increased reliance on fungicides, and breeding pressures that divert resources from yield enhancement. Resurgences, such as in since 2013, highlight ongoing epidemiological challenges, where conducive climates could amplify losses without vigilant resistance deployment. These impacts emphasize stem rust's role as a persistent barrier to sustainable production, particularly in regions with limited access to resistant cultivars or .

Host Resistance and Management Strategies

Genetic Resistance in Wheat

Genetic resistance to stem rust in wheat (Triticum aestivum) primarily involves race-specific major genes designated as Sr (stem rust resistance) loci, which encode nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins that recognize corresponding avirulence effectors in the pathogen Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici (Pgt), triggering hypersensitive cell death. These genes provide all-stage resistance (ASR) effective from seedling to adult stages but are prone to defeat by evolving virulent Pgt races due to the gene-for-gene interaction. Adult plant resistance (APR), often polygenic and quantitative, contributes to partial resistance and is more durable when combined with major genes, as it slows disease progression without complete immunity. Over 60 Sr genes have been identified, with key examples including Sr31, transferred from (Secale cereale) via the 1BL.1RS translocation and widely deployed globally until overcome by the Ug99 race group (TTKSK and variants) first detected in in 1999. Sr24, derived from Thinopyrum ponticum, remains effective against many races but is virulent in Ug99 variants like TTKST. Newer genes such as Sr21 from Thinopyrum elongatum, Sr22 and Sr33 from wild relatives, and Sr8155B1 from durum wheat line 8155-B1 confer resistance to Ug99 races; Sr8155B1, cloned in 2025, encodes an NLR protein providing robust ASR with infection types 0 or 0;. The emergence of Ug99 and its lineages, virulent on Sr31, Sr24, Sr27, Sr21, and others, has driven the identification of novel Sr genes from wheat wild relatives and landraces, with virulence spectra expanding to include Sr9h by 2015. Temperature-sensitive genes like Sr6 enhance resistance at lower temperatures (below 20°C), reflecting adaptive molecular pathways that boost effector-triggered immunity under cool conditions prevalent in highland epidemic hotspots. However, single-gene deployments lead to "boom-and-bust" cycles, as Pgt mutates rapidly—Ug99 evolved virulence on multiple Sr genes within years of widespread use. Breeding strategies emphasize pyramiding multiple effective Sr genes using (MAS) to achieve broad-spectrum resistance, alongside incorporating APR quantitative trait loci (QTL) for durability. from alien species via chromosome engineering has introduced genes like Sr22, Sr33, Sr35, and Sr45, cloned and functionally validated between 2021 and 2025 for transfer into elite lines. Genomic selection and high-throughput phenotyping accelerate deployment of durable combinations, as demonstrated in varieties like 'Linkert' with APR effective against emerging Ug99 variants. Ongoing efforts prioritize undiscovered Sr genes from 's to counter evolving Pgt races, avoiding over-reliance on defeated loci like Sr31 prevalent in regions such as Hebei Province, China.

Eradication and Cultural Controls

The Barberry Eradication Program, initiated by the federal government in in cooperation with state authorities, targeted the removal of common barberry () shrubs, the primary alternate host for the sexual phase of f. sp. tritici, to interrupt fungal recombination and reduce the emergence of virulent races. This effort eradicated over 100 million barberry bushes across the northern by the late 1970s, significantly lowering stem rust incidence by eliminating local sources of pycniospores and aeciospores that diversify . Post-program surveillance confirmed barberry's near-absence in eradication zones, though isolated plants persist and are uprooted annually, with federal quarantines still prohibiting their propagation in 31 eastern and midwestern states. Similar campaigns occurred in and parts of , where barberry exclusion reduced overwintering inoculum and epidemic severity, though complete elimination proved challenging due to the pathogen's polycyclic on grasses. While effective against sexual diversification—pre-program barberry nurseries generated new races annually—these measures did not eradicate stem rust entirely, as urediniospores persist via wind dispersal from southern regions or volunteer hosts, necessitating complementary strategies. Cultural controls for stem rust emphasize reducing initial inoculum and environmental favorability through practices like destroying volunteer plants before spring green-up, which serve as bridges for urediniospore carryover from fall infections. Crop rotation with non-host crops, such as or corn, limits residue-borne spores, while adjusting planting dates to avoid coinciding with peak aecial release from barberry minimizes early-season exposure. Balanced fertilization prevents excessive succulent growth that heightens susceptibility, and field sanitation—such as of stubble—buries infected debris to degrade teliospores before spring germination. These non-chemical methods, when integrated regionally, have sustained low rust levels in eradication zones but require vigilant community enforcement to counter reinvasion by wind-dispersed urediniospores.

Chemical and Integrated Approaches

Foliar fungicides represent the primary chemical approach for managing stem rust caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in , with demethylation inhibitor (DMI) triazoles such as and showing consistent efficacy when applied at the onset of infection. Field trials have demonstrated that these compounds can reduce severity by 70-95% in susceptible cultivars under high pressure, particularly for races like Ug99, by inhibiting biosynthesis in fungal membranes. Application timing is critical, typically at flag leaf emergence (Feekes growth stage 8-9) or early pustule formation, to maximize canopy protection and yield preservation, with rates of 0.1-0.25 kg per depending on product labels. However, triazoles offer only 3-4 weeks of residual activity, necessitating multiple applications in severe outbreaks, and overuse has prompted monitoring for reduced sensitivity in pathogen populations since the early 2010s. Other fungicide classes, including strobilurins (QoIs) like , provide complementary control through mitochondrial respiration inhibition but are less effective alone against stem rust and face widespread resistance risks when not rotated. Efficacy ratings from regional extension services classify triazoles and mixtures (e.g., + prothioconazole) as "very good" to "excellent" for stem rust suppression under optimal conditions, though performance declines in advanced infections or under high humidity. Environmental and economic constraints limit chemical reliance, as costs can exceed $20-30 per hectare per application, and runoff poses risks to non-target organisms, underscoring the need for precision application via decision support systems. Integrated management strategies mitigate these limitations by synergizing s with host resistance, cultural practices, and surveillance. Deploying varieties with partial (adult plant) resistance alongside one or two targeted applications has extended control durability, reducing inputs by 30-50% in field studies while preserving yields. Early detection through trap nurseries and spore monitoring networks enables prophylactic or curative sprays only when thresholds (e.g., 1-5% severity) are met, as outlined in USDA recovery plans for Ug99 variants. Variety mixtures or multilines, combined with reduced-rate s and optimization to avoid excessive vegetative growth, further disrupt epidemic buildup, with trials showing 20-40% lower disease incidence compared to monoculture chemical-only systems. with non-hosts and barberry eradication (where applicable) amplify these effects, forming a multi-layered defense that delays resistance evolution and supports sustainable production in endemic regions.

Research Advances

Key Resistance Genes and Mechanisms

Stem rust resistance in wheat is conferred by over 60 designated Sr (stem rust resistance) genes, which primarily operate through race-specific, gene-for-gene interactions where the host Sr protein recognizes corresponding pathogen avirulence effectors, triggering effector-triggered immunity (ETI) via a hypersensitive response that restricts fungal growth. These genes encode nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) receptors in most cases, enabling rapid defense activation, though some, like Sr43, feature atypical kinase-NLR fusions that confer broad-spectrum resistance against diverse Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici (Pgt) isolates. Race-specific Sr genes such as Sr31 (derived from rye chromosome 1R) and Sr24 (from Thinopyrum ponticum) provided effective seedling resistance for decades but were overcome by virulent races like Ug99 (TTKSK) and its variants, highlighting the pathogen's evolutionary adaptability. Durable resistance mechanisms emphasize adult plant resistance (APR), exemplified by Sr2, which reduces disease severity through partial, quantitative effects like increased latent period and reduced production rather than complete halt, often involving slow-rusting phenotypes without . Sr2 complexes with neighboring genes to enhance , contributing to its longevity in cultivars since the , unlike many qualitative Sr genes that succumb to selection pressure. Temperature-sensitive responses modulate some Sr functions; for instance, Sr6 boosts immunity at lower temperatures via distinct molecular pathways, while others like Sr33 and Sr35 maintain across conditions but face threats. Recent cloning efforts have identified novel Sr genes with potential for stacking in breeding programs, such as Sr8155B1, a typical NLR effective against Ug99 variants, and Sr21 from Thinopyrum elongatum, which targets the Ug99 race group through effector recognition. Mechanisms beyond NLR-ETI include lignification in rapid responses and gene pyramiding for multi-layered defense, though pathogen counter-evolution necessitates integrating APR with major Sr genes for sustainable resistance.

Recent Breakthroughs in Breeding and Genomics

In 2025, researchers developed an optimized workflow for cloning disease resistance genes, integrating (EMS) mutagenesis, speed breeding, and -assisted screening, reducing the timeline to approximately 179 days for identifying and validating candidates. As proof-of-principle, this method cloned the stem rust resistance Sr6 on 2D, a BED-NLR encoding that confers resistance to Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici (Pgt) isolate H3; validation involved virus-induced (VIGS) and / mutagenesis, confirming its necessity and sufficiency for resistance. This approach addresses 's polyploid genome complexity, enabling faster deployment of resistance loci in breeding programs compared to traditional mapping, which often spans years. The Sr8155B1 gene, mapped to chromosome arm 6AS in durum wheat line 8155-B1, was cloned in June 2025, revealing it encodes a canonical nucleotide-binding (NLR) protein that provides all-stage resistance specifically to the Ug99 race group of Pgt, including races TTKSK and TTKST. High-resolution genetic mapping identified candidate NLRs, with functional validation demonstrating hypersensitive responses to Ug99 effectors; this gene's broad efficacy against Ug99 variants, absent in susceptible lines, supports its into elite for pyramidized resistance stacks. Fine mapping delimited Sr8155B1 to a 100-kb interval, facilitating to counter Ug99's , which overcame genes like Sr31 since 1999. A September 2025 meta-genome-wide association study (GWAS) across five global populations (10,725 phenotypic records from 13 field trials) identified 17 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for stem rust resistance on chromosomes 1B, 2A, 2B, 2D, 3A, 3B, 3D, 4D, 6A, and 6B, with of 0.62. Notably, five novel Sr QTLs emerged, alongside six pleiotropic loci effective against multiple rusts (e.g., stem, , stripe), offering breeders durable, multi-pathogen targets; integration with data prioritizes low-frequency variants for diverse enhancement. These genomic resources accelerate breeding by enabling predictive modeling of resistance durability against evolving Pgt races.

Weaponization and Biosecurity Risks

Historical Biological Weapon Programs

During the , the researched Puccinia graminis tritici, the causative agent of wheat stem rust, as an anti-crop biological warfare agent to disrupt enemy food supplies. Between 1951 and 1969, U.S. facilities including Edgewood Arsenal produced and stockpiled over 30,000 kilograms of the pathogen's spores, primarily for aerial dissemination. This effort involved testing delivery systems such as the M115 "feather bomb," a 500-pound adapted from a propaganda leaflet dispenser to release lightweight spore clusters over vast agricultural areas, with trials conducted at sites like . The program's focus on P. graminis stemmed from the fungus's high , spore dispersibility by wind, and potential to cause widespread yield losses in staple crops without immediate lethality to humans. The similarly investigated Puccinia graminis as part of its expansive biological weapons program, maintaining stocks of the pathogen alongside other crop-targeting agents like Pyricularia oryzae (rice blast fungus) for strategic of agricultural production. Soviet research emphasized and techniques, integrated into broader anti-agriculture capabilities developed at facilities under military oversight, though specific deployment plans for stem rust remain less documented than for animal or human pathogens. U.S. offensive biological weapons development, including anti-crop agents, was unilaterally terminated by President in 1969, with stockpiles ordered destroyed by 1973 in anticipation of international treaties. The 1972 , ratified by both superpowers, banned further development, production, and stockpiling of such agents, leading to the official dismantlement of declared programs; however, Soviet adherence to the treaty for covert anti-crop research has been questioned in declassified assessments.

Modern Threats and Surveillance

The emergence of the Ug99 race (TTKSK) of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in in 1998 represents a persistent modern threat to global wheat production, with virulence against the Sr31 resistance and susceptibility in approximately 90% of global varieties. This race and its variants have spread from to the , including and , with wind-borne spores and human-mediated transport via infected seed or equipment posing risks of further dissemination to major wheat-producing regions in and beyond, potentially causing yield losses exceeding 50% in susceptible crops. Recent has identified additional virulent races, such as two new pathotypes in between 2016 and 2020, underscoring the pathogen's evolutionary adaptability and the vulnerability of deployed resistances. Surveillance efforts, coordinated by the Borlaug Global Rust Initiative (BGRI) established in 2005, employ trap nurseries, sentinel plots, and to monitor race evolution and distribution, particularly in epidemic hotspots like and . These programs maintain global race databases and utilize geospatial tools to track spore dispersal patterns, enabling early detection and response to outbreaks, as demonstrated by the identification of Ug99 variants through annual field surveys and differential host testing. International collaboration under BGRI has facilitated the rapid characterization of over 80 pathotypes since 2005, informing breeding programs and reducing the incidence of undetected incursions. Biosecurity risks amplify natural threats, with P. graminis identified as a capable of due to its potential for aerosolized dissemination and capacity to devastate staple crops without immediate human health impacts. Modern assessments highlight vulnerabilities in regions with high dependency, where deliberate introduction could exacerbate insecurity, prompting enhanced U.S. Department of modeling of stem rust threats for risk mitigation. Ongoing genomic integrates sequencing to distinguish natural mutations from potential engineered strains, though no verified instances of weaponization have occurred post-20th century programs.

Future Challenges and Outlook

Emerging Pathogen Races

The Ug99 race group of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici (Pgt), first detected in Uganda during the 1998–1999 growing season, represents a pivotal emergence of virulent stem rust pathogens capable of overcoming the Sr31 resistance gene prevalent in many wheat cultivars worldwide. This race, designated TTKSK, initiated a lineage that has evolved into multiple variants, with 15 identified by 2024 across at least 13 countries, primarily in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. These variants, such as TTKTF and TTKTK, exhibit complex virulence profiles that defeat additional Sr genes like Sr24 and Sr27, rendering 80–90% of global wheat varieties susceptible in regions of spread. Surveillance efforts from 2020 to 2024 have documented further diversification within the Ug99 lineage and beyond, including races TTKTT, TTKTF, TTTTF, TKKTF, and TKTTF, with TTKTT emerging as a highly Ug99 showing a 95% virulence spectrum against common resistance genes. In eastern , TKKTF has predominated in collections from 2017–2020, underscoring regional and pressures. TTKTT, in particular, overcomes 19 Sr genes except Sr36, posing acute risks to deployed resistances in commercial . Outside Africa, new races have surfaced in other wheat belts; for instance, in South Africa, races 2SA42 (PTKSK + Sr8b) and 2SA5 (BFGSF + Sr9h) were identified in 2017, with subsequent detections of 2SA105, 2SA107, and 2SA108 varying by province through 2023. In the Caucasus region, such as Georgia, 13 races were characterized from 2017–2020 isolates, dominated by TKKTF. These emergences highlight the pathogen's rapid evolution via mutation and migration, often correlating with geographic and climatic factors, as evidenced by genetic diversity analyses of Ug99 variants in Egypt and Denmark greenhouses. Ongoing monitoring through trap nurseries and differential host testing remains essential to track virulence shifts and inform breeding for broad-spectrum resistance.

Strategies for Durable Resistance

Pyramiding multiple stem rust resistance genes (Sr genes) into wheat cultivars represents a primary strategy for achieving durable resistance, as it imposes a high genetic barrier for the pathogen Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici (Pgt) to evolve virulence against all stacked genes simultaneously, an event requiring rare, independent mutations. Breeding programs have successfully pyramided up to four Sr genes effective against Ug99-lineage races, such as , , , and , into elite germplasm to broaden the resistance spectrum beyond single-gene deployments that often fail within years. This approach has been enhanced by , enabling precise stacking without linkage drag, as demonstrated in Indian and Canadian wheat breeding efforts targeting both stem and stripe rusts. Adult plant resistance (APR) mechanisms, distinct from hypersensitive seedling responses, confer partial rusting phenotypes that slow development and have proven more durable due to polygenic control and lower selection pressure on Pgt. The , deployed widely since , exemplifies APR by inducing chlorotic flecks and reduced pustule size at adult stages, remaining effective against diverse Pgt races for over 80 years without reported . Combining Sr2 with other APR loci or minor quantitative trait loci (QTLs) via genomic selection further elevates resistance levels, as five or more minor genes can approximate near-immunity, per field trials showing reduced infection rates under high disease pressure. Diversified deployment strategies mitigate uniform gene erosion by avoiding widespread monoculture of single resistances, incorporating varietal mixtures, multiline cultivars, and regionally varied gene cassettes informed by pathotype surveillance. For instance, the U.S. action plan against Ug99 emphasizes germplasm diversification and diagnostic tools to rotate effective Sr genes, reducing the probability of race-specific breakdowns observed in historical epidemics. Integrating race-nonspecific slow-rusting with major genes in breeding pipelines, alongside global monitoring networks, sustains resistance longevity, as evidenced by Mexican wheat releases combining APR for multiple rusts that have endured since the mid-20th century.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.