Hubbry Logo
Quick access recorderQuick access recorderMain
Open search
Quick access recorder
Community hub
Quick access recorder
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Quick access recorder
Quick access recorder
Quick access recorder
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A quick access recorder (QAR) is an airborne flight recorder designed to provide quick and easy access to raw flight data,[1] through means such as USB[2] or cellular network[3] connections and/or the use of standard flash memory cards.[2] QARs are typically used by airlines to improve flight safety and operational efficiency, usually in the scope of their flight operational quality assurance plans.[4] Like the aircraft's flight data recorder (FDR), a QAR receives its inputs from the Flight Data Acquisition Unit (FDAU), recording over 2000 flight parameters.[1] The QAR is also able to sample data at much higher rates than the FDR and, in some cases, for longer periods of time. Unlike the FDR, the QAR usually is not required by a national Civil Aviation Authority on commercial flights and is not designed to survive an accident. Despite this, some QARs have survived accidents and provided valuable information beyond what was recorded by the FDR.[5][page needed]

The quick access recorder was pioneered by British European Airways (BEA) on its Hawker Siddeley Trident aircraft in the 1960s as a requirement to prove the safety of the aircraft's autoland system for certification of the autoland system by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). Quick access recorders are installed in all aircraft operated by BEA's successor airline, British Airways (BA). Data from the Penny & Giles quick access recorder of a BA Boeing 747-400 London-Bangkok flight in which the aircraft suffered un-commanded elevator movement and momentary elevator reversal caused Boeing to implement a change in the elevator servo valve design, a modification that was applied to all Boeing 747s in service, and suspicion of a similar original valve design arising from this BA data was subsequently used by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in the determining of the causes of the crashes of United Airlines Flight 585 and USAir Flight 427.[6]

Earlier, data from a Trident's quick access recorder had provided the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) with useful supplemental data over-and-above that of the aircraft's flight data recorder that helped the diagnosing of the cause of the 1972 British European Airways Flight 548, the "Staines air disaster" where the Trident's leading edge droop flaps had been retracted too early and at too low an airspeed.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Quick access recorder

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Quick Access Recorder (QAR) is an airborne flight data recorder installed in aircraft to capture and store raw flight parameters from various systems, enabling quick and easy retrieval for routine analysis rather than crash investigation. Unlike the crash-survivable Flight Data Recorder (FDR), which is designed for and accident survivability, the QAR prioritizes portability, higher data capacity, and non-destructive access via or interfaces. The primary purpose of a QAR is to support Flight Operations Quality Assurance (FOQA) and Flight Data Monitoring (FDM) programs, allowing airlines to analyze operational for improving safety, efficiency, and . It records parameters such as , flight controls, navigation , and subsystem statuses from data buses like ARINC 717 or , often storing over 400 hours of multi-channel information. Modern QARs incorporate advanced features, including , 4G/5G cellular connectivity, and (e.g., AES 256-bit), to enable automatic offloading post-flight or real-time transmission to ground servers. Pioneered in the as an evolution from basic flight data systems, QARs have progressed from manual tape-based storage to compact, network-enabled units that function as onboard data servers for diagnostics and fuel optimization. These devices are typically compact Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) mounted near the aircraft's FDR, compatible with a range of commercial jets including the , and are essential for proactive management without the stringent certification requirements of black boxes.

Overview

Definition and purpose

A Quick Access Recorder (QAR) is an airborne flight data recorder designed to capture and store raw flight data from in a format that enables quick and easy retrieval via interfaces such as USB, removable solid-state media, or wireless transmission. Unlike crash-protected flight data recorders (FDRs), which emphasize durability for accident survival, QARs focus on accessibility to support ongoing operational use rather than post-incident recovery. The primary purpose of a QAR is to enable routine monitoring of performance, pilot actions, and procedural adherence, facilitating proactive enhancements to and efficiency within operations. By integrating with programs such as Flight Operational Quality Assurance (FOQA), QARs allow for the analysis of flight trends and the identification of potential risks before they escalate into incidents, distinct from the investigative role of FDRs. QARs provide airlines with a cost-effective means of data access, minimizing downtime and maintenance efforts required for extraction and review. Commonly installed on commercial and military aircraft, these devices record hundreds to thousands of parameters throughout each flight, enabling detailed yet practical assessments of operational health.

Key differences from other recorders

The Quick Access Recorder (QAR) differs fundamentally from the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) in its design priorities, lacking the crash-survivable casing and required for FDRs to endure extreme impacts, fires, and submersion in accident investigations. While FDRs must comply with (ICAO) standards mandating a minimum of 88 parameters for post-accident analysis, QARs can record over 2,000 parameters at higher sampling rates, enabling detailed routine monitoring but without the emphasis on post-crash recovery. This allows QARs to prioritize rapid post-flight data extraction via or USB interfaces, contrasting with the FDR's rugged, hard-to-access installation in the aircraft tail. In contrast to the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR), which captures audio from the flight deck including pilot communications and ambient sounds on a continuous 2-hour overwrite loop to preserve the most recent events, the QAR records quantitative flight parameters such as airspeed, altitude, and engine performance without any audio component or cyclical overwriting. This enables QARs to archive complete flight histories—often exceeding 400 hours—facilitating comprehensive trend analysis rather than the CVR's focus on short-term forensic audio recovery. QARs employ solid-state memory for straightforward data retrieval, typically integrating directly with aircraft data buses like to acquire parameters from systems, unlike the heavily ruggedized enclosures of FDRs and CVRs designed for crash survival. This compact, lightweight construction permits installation in accessible locations such as the avionics bay, enhancing operational efficiency over the protected but cumbersome placements of crash-protected recorders. While FDRs and CVRs are mandated by ICAO for accident investigation and survivability in , QARs support voluntary airline initiatives like Flight Operations Quality Assurance (FOQA) programs, providing ongoing performance monitoring and safety enhancements through routine data downloads. This divergence underscores the QAR's role in proactive rather than reactive post-incident forensics.

History

Early development

The Quick Access Recorder (QAR) emerged from early flight data recording systems developed in the mid-20th century to support performance monitoring and operational , distinct from crash-protected flight data recorders required for investigations. In the and , precursors to the QAR consisted of foil-based recorders that engraved basic parameters—such as , , magnetic heading, vertical acceleration, and microphone keying—onto metal foil or paper strips, primarily for voluntary use by airlines like those operating the 707 to track fatigue damage and flight efficiency amid growing commercial . These analog systems, however, suffered from calibration inaccuracies and limited reliability, prompting the industry to seek more robust tools for routine data access without regulatory mandates. The transition to digital QAR technology began in the 1960s, with (BEA) pioneering its integration on aircraft to enable quick retrieval of flight parameters for operational review, marking the device's initial focus on non-accident . By the , manufacturers like developed the first digital prototypes, shifting from foil to magnetic wire and tape storage to improve data accuracy and capture more parameters, driven by airlines' increasing need for voluntary tools to monitor and in an era of expanding air traffic. These early digital systems were installed on large jet fleets, including and models, as airlines adopted them proactively to enhance efficiency without awaiting regulatory requirements. A significant milestone occurred in 1987 with the introduction of the ATM-QAR by ATM PP Sp. z o.o., the first commercially available fully digital unit using solid-state memory cartridges for high-reliability data capture, compatible with systems on aircraft such as the Boeing 737, Boeing 767, and Airbus A310. Initial QAR models, including these prototypes, were limited to recording 50 to 100 parameters on magnetic tape, which required manual cartridge removal and physical handling for data retrieval, posing logistical challenges for frequent airline use.

Modern advancements

In the 1990s, Quick Access Recorders (QARs) transitioned from tape-based and magneto-optical storage to solid-state memory technologies, such as flash and , which dramatically increased data capacity to several gigabytes and improved reliability by eliminating mechanical components. This shift addressed the limitations of earlier tape-based systems, which offered only limited recording durations and were prone to degradation. During the and , innovations focused on enhanced connectivity and integration with modern networks. The first Wireless Quick Access Recorder (WQAR) was introduced by Teledyne in 1999, using cellular for transmission. Wireless download capabilities, including interfaces, emerged to facilitate rapid offloading without physical connections, as seen in systems like Astronics' QARs that support direct transfer to electronic flight bags or ground systems. Additionally, QARs began integrating with advanced aircraft platforms, enabling the capture of high-bandwidth streams. Models such as those from (formerly Ballard Technology) support detailed flight operations (FOQA) analysis. In the 2020s, QAR technology has advanced toward real-time capabilities, with systems incorporating satellite communications (SATCOM) for streaming data during flight to enable . For instance, wireless QARs automatically transmit flight data via SATCOM or cellular networks upon landing, allowing operators to detect anomalies proactively and reduce . Complementing this, virtual QAR (vQAR) applications, such as Collins Aerospace's InteliSight vQAR+ hosted on interface devices (AIDs), provide QAR functionality without dedicated hardware, leveraging existing onboard computing to process and store data efficiently. These advancements, driven by exponential storage growth akin to , have made QARs a standard feature on the majority of commercial fleets, facilitating data-driven enhancements and operational efficiencies across the aviation industry.

Technical specifications

Data parameters recorded

Quick access recorders (QARs) capture a comprehensive set of flight parameters, typically ranging from 500 to over 2,000 variables, far exceeding the minimum requirements for flight data recorders (FDRs) to support detailed operational analysis. Core parameters include fundamental such as indicated airspeed (IAS), , magnetic heading (MHDG), pitch and roll attitudes, vertical , and , which provide the baseline for reconstructing and attitude. Engine performance metrics form another essential category, encompassing parameters like and N2 fan speeds, flow rates, and torque, enabling monitoring of and health during all flight phases. Control surface positions, such as flap extension, trim, and deflection, along with pilot inputs like power lever angle (PLA), are also recorded to assess handling and configuration changes. Beyond these core elements, QARs extend to system health and environmental metrics, including hydraulic pressure, cabin temperature, and derived components, which aid in evaluating non-critical but operationally relevant conditions like pressurization and . Unlike FDRs, which must record at least 88 parameters as required by regulations, though many record several hundred in total for accident investigation, QAR configurations are customizable by airlines to include airline-specific data, such as modes, pressures, or precise quantities, allowing tailored integration with flight operations quality assurance (FOQA) programs for proactive enhancements. This flexibility ensures capture of both safety-critical and performance-optimizing variables without the crash-survival constraints of FDRs. Sampling rates for these parameters vary by criticality to balance resolution and storage, typically ranging from 1 Hz for slowly varying data like gross weight to 64 Hz for high-frequency events such as accelerations or control inputs during maneuvers like hard landings. Data is stored as time-stamped binary streams in formats compliant with ARINC 717 for digital flight recording systems or for input buses, facilitating accurate playback and reconstruction of flight sequences through structured frames and subframes.

Recording and storage technology

Quick Access Recorders (QARs) are implemented as compact line-replaceable units (LRUs) that interface with aircraft data buses, such as ARINC 717 and ARINC 429, to acquire flight data from the Flight Data Acquisition Unit (FDAU). These units comply with aviation standards like ARINC specifications for data formatting and interfaces. These units typically incorporate embedded processors, like ARM-based or Intel Atom cores, to handle data processing and storage within a lightweight form factor weighing less than 6 ounces for micro variants. Solid-state memory, including removable SD/SDHC cards or internal NAND flash, provides non-volatile storage, with capacities reaching up to 256 gigabytes to support extended recording durations of 160 to over 3,000 hours depending on data rates. The recording process involves continuous acquisition of digital and analog signals from , capturing parameters at sample rates often exceeding 1 Hz for enhanced resolution compared to flight data recorders. Data is automatically logged whenever the 's flight data recorder is active, generating approximately 7.2 megabytes per day per , with overwriting of older records after download or upon reaching fixed archival limits to manage storage efficiently. While compression techniques may be applied in some implementations to handle high data volumes, the primary focus remains on reliable, timestamped capture without the need for crash survivability. Retrieval of QAR data emphasizes ease of access through quick-access interfaces, including USB 2.0 ports, Ethernet, (802.11 standards), or cellular LTE modems for wireless offload. Manufacturer-specific software, such as avSYNC or client applications compatible with FOQA systems, enables decoding, validation, and export of raw data to analysis platforms, often completing transfers within 15 minutes post-landing via encrypted tunnels. Reliability is ensured through features like (MTBF) exceeding 100,000 hours, data validation protocols including consistency and sensor checks, and options for power supplies to accommodate varied environments. Error-checking mechanisms, such as cyclic redundancy checks (CRC), are integrated to maintain during recording and transfer, achieving capture rates up to 99.8%. Unlike crash-protected recorders, QARs lack physical hardening and are optimized for routine ground handling and maintenance access.

Applications

Flight operations quality assurance

Flight Operations Quality Assurance (FOQA) is a voluntary airline initiative that leverages Quick Access Recorder (QAR) data to systematically analyze trends in pilot performance, , and adherence to standard operating procedures (SOPs), enabling proactive safety enhancements. Originating from collaborations in the late and 1990s, including workshops by the and NASA's development of the Aviation Performance Measuring System (APMS) at , FOQA programs evolved from earlier flight data recording efforts to support aggregate, de-identified analysis across fleets. This approach originated with early adopters like in the and gained formal structure through FAA demonstrations in the mid-1990s, emphasizing non-punitive data use to foster continuous improvement. Key applications of QAR data in FOQA include event detection, such as identifying unstable approaches through parameter thresholds like excessive descent rates exceeding 1,000 feet per minute, and benchmarking crew performance against SOPs for procedural compliance. Anonymous aggregation of this data protects pilot privacy in line with FAA guidelines under 14 CFR parts 13 and 193, as well as FAA Order 8000.81, ensuring de-identified trends are shared without individual attribution to encourage participation. For instance, FOQA analysis has targeted reductions in runway excursions by monitoring parameters like speed and alignment deviations during landing phases, alerting operators to systemic issues before incidents occur. The FOQA process begins with post-flight QAR downloads, which provide easy access to over 2,000 parameters at higher sample rates than required for Flight Data Recorders, feeding into ground-based software like the Ground Data Replay and Analysis System (GDRAS) for automated event flagging and trend monitoring. The FOQA Monitoring Team (FMT) then reviews aggregates to generate alerts and recommend interventions, such as targeted training or procedure revisions, with data optionally shared via industry mechanisms for broader benchmarking. This facilitates ongoing operational monitoring without disrupting flight schedules. FOQA outcomes include quantifiable safety gains, such as significant reductions in exceedance rates for monitored events; for example, one operator achieved an 87% decrease in engine over-temperature incidents, yielding over $100 million in savings through informed adjustments. Broader implementations have demonstrated up to 40% reductions in overall event rates over a decade of consistent use, contributing to lower accident rates in participating fleets compared to non-participants by addressing latent risks early. These benefits underscore FOQA's role in enhancing fleet-wide and efficiency through data-driven insights.

Maintenance and safety analysis

Quick Access Recorders (QARs) play a crucial role in engineering maintenance by enabling the of intermittent faults through the of diverse data streams, such as performance metrics with logs recorded during flight. This approach allows maintenance teams to identify subtle anomalies that may not manifest during ground inspections, facilitating targeted interventions without full disassembly. For instance, Bayesian neural networks trained on QAR parameters like , , and rotor speed can predict aeroengine operation reliability, highlighting potential issues in real-time for proactive resolution. In , QAR data supports analytics for scheduling component replacements by analyzing trends across thousands of parameters, including in-flight sensor measurements and operating regimes. models applied to historical QAR datasets have successfully forecasted failures, such as flow control valve malfunctions, months in advance, enabling airlines to optimize part lifecycles and minimize unscheduled downtime. These capabilities extend to broader system diagnostics, where algorithms and SHAP values quantify the influence of flight phases on reliability, aiding in the prioritization of maintenance actions. For safety analysis, QARs facilitate non-accident investigations by reviewing events like encounters, where spatiotemporal patterns in from 2017–2019 flights revealed nationwide turbulence risks through parameters such as vertical acceleration and . Similarly, system anomalies are detected via automated methods like MAD-XFP, which processes QAR streams to identify deviations in operational status without relying on crash-protected devices. Integration with Aircraft Health Management (AHM) systems, such as Airbus's , incorporates QAR-derived parameters from stable flight conditions to monitor overall and engine health, enhancing post-event reviews. Case examples illustrate QAR's utility in assessing specific risks; for hard landings, analysis of Boeing 777 QAR data from 24 incidents (2017–2019) correlated descent rates and flight path angles with vertical G-forces exceeding 1.9G, quantifying stress and identifying causes like low approaches below 200 feet. QAR data can also be exported to tools like Boeing's Insight Accelerator for trend forecasting, which leverages QAR parameters alongside contextual sources to predict premature part degradation across fleets. Compared to Flight Data Recorders (FDRs), QARs offer advantages in maintenance and safety by providing immediate, routine data access with expanded parameter sets—often over 2,000 at higher sample rates—enabling faster fault resolution and fleet-wide without the regulatory constraints of accident investigations. This complements programs like Flight Operations (FOQA) by focusing on insights rather than procedural oversight.

Regulations and standards

International requirements

The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) recommends the establishment of a Flight Data Analysis Programme (FDAP) for operators of aeroplanes with a maximum certificated take-off mass exceeding 20,000 kg, becoming mandatory for those over 27,000 kg as part of their safety management system under Annex 6, Part I. While Quick Access Recorders (QARs) are not explicitly required, they serve as a primary tool for implementing mandatory FDAP by capturing flight data, aligning with the mandatory parameters for Flight Data Recorders (FDRs) outlined in Appendix 8 of Annex 6—such as pressure altitude, indicated airspeed, and engine parameters—while permitting additional operational parameters for enhanced analysis. Detailed guidance on FDAP structure, including QAR data handling and parameter selection, is provided in ICAO Doc 10000, emphasizing integration with broader safety initiatives without imposing QAR as a binding requirement. In the United States, QAR installation remains voluntary for air carriers operating under 14 CFR Part 121, which focuses on mandatory FDR and Voice Recorder (CVR) specifications but encourages voluntary programs like Flight Operations Quality Assurance (FOQA) that rely on QARs for proactive safety monitoring. Participation in FOQA, approved by the (FAA), necessitates QARs to record and analyze an expanded set of parameters beyond FDR minima, with FAA 120-82 suggesting comprehensive coverage to identify operational trends. Similarly, the (EASA) deems QARs voluntary under Regulation (EU) No 965/ (Air Operations), though Flight Data Monitoring (FDM) programmes—which QARs support—are mandatory for aeroplanes exceeding 27,000 kg maximum certified take-off mass (MCTOM) under ORO.AOC.130, aligning with ICAO's framework. EASA guidance in its Flight Data Monitoring report recommends QAR parameters that match FDR requirements while incorporating extras for efficiency analysis, without specifying a fixed minimum but promoting based on type. A key aspect of international QAR standards is robust protection to foster a non-punitive and encourage data sharing. ICAO Doc 10000 stresses the importance of techniques—such as removing or anonymizing identifiers like flight numbers, dates, and crew details—to prevent association with specific individuals or flights, recommending non-reversible processes post-analysis while retaining utility for improvements. This aligns with FAA protections under FOQA, where de-identified qualifies as voluntarily submitted information exempt from certain enforcement actions per 14 CFR Part 121, and EASA's emphasis on confidentiality in FDM to build trust among operators and crews. Global implementation of QAR requirements varies significantly, with ICAO's framework allowing flexibility for states to adapt standards. In , the (CAAC) has required QAR installation on all commercial since 1997 under CCAR-121, mandating approval by CAAC or equivalent equipment to support mandatory flight monitoring and FOQA-like programs. This contrasts with the optional approach in most regions, including and ; however, similar mandatory provisions exist in parts of , such as certain Southeast Asian states influenced by regional safety initiatives, to address high-traffic density and enhance oversight beyond ICAO minima.

Implementation by aviation authorities

The (FAA) promotes the implementation of Quick Access Recorders (QARs) through (AC) 120-82, which provides guidance for operators to develop and operate voluntary Flight Operational Quality Assurance (FOQA) programs using QAR data to enhance and efficiency. This circular integrates QAR utilization with Aviation Action Program (ASAP) initiatives, emphasizing non-punitive analysis of flight data. To facilitate voluntary participation, the FAA grants limited immunity for data submitted under approved FOQA and ASAP programs, prohibiting its use for enforcement actions except in cases of criminal or deliberate misconduct, as specified in FAA Order 2150.3C and 49 U.S.C. § 40123. The (EASA) encourages QAR deployment as part of Flight Data Monitoring (FDM) programs under ORO.AOC.130 of Regulation (EU) No 965/2012, recommending integration with existing Flight Data Recorder (FDR) systems to expand monitoring capabilities without disrupting crash-protected recordings. EASA's good practice guidelines stress secure data handling to protect sensitive operational information, particularly for EU-based airlines subject to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which requires appropriate technical and organizational measures to safeguard any embedded in flight recordings. The (CAAC) mandates QAR installation on all commercial transport aircraft operating under CCAR-121, requiring operators to upload flight data regularly for safety oversight, with annual compliance audits conducted by regional CAAC authorities to verify system functionality and . Compliance with these authority-specific policies presents challenges, including hardware through Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) or equivalent approvals for QAR installations to ensure airworthiness under FAA Part 25 or standards, as no dedicated Technical Standard Order (TSO) exists for QARs. Additionally, operators must provide specialized for ground crews on secure data extraction, analysis, and storage to meet regulatory expectations for handling non-protected flight records.

References

  1. https://skybrary.aero/articles/quick-access-recorder-qar
  2. https://www.astronics.com/quick-access-recorders
  3. https://atleurope.aero/the-evolution-of-quick-access-recorders/
  4. https://dsi-hums.com/cvfdr/quick-access-recorder-qar/
  5. https://www.airports-worldwide.com/articles/article0875.php
  6. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_120-82.pdf
  7. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20205010374/downloads/SciTech_bleulaine2021precursor.pdf
  8. https://www.caa.co.uk/publication/download/15178
  9. https://acronaviation.com/avionics/recorders/micro-quick-access-recorder/
  10. https://skybrary.aero/articles/flight-data-recorder-fdr
  11. https://www.theblackbox.co.ke/the-modern-product-managers-tech-stack/
  12. https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/medias-media/fiches-facts/a20f0002/enregistreurs-recorders/20200309.html
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Parameters-available-for-each-QAR-record_tbl3_321838668
  14. https://www.curtisswrightds.com/media-center/blog/flight-recorder-types
  15. https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/media/25-Hr-CVR_NPRM_Issuance.pdf
  16. https://aero-access.com/aeroaccessstorefront/aeroaccess/en/USD/Catalog/Missions/Flight-Data-Recorders/QAR/c/QAR
  17. https://flightrecorder.com/qar.html
  18. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/16T0153_ATR_FDM_2016.pdf
  19. https://asasi.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/The_Evolution_of_Flight_Data_Analysis_Neil_Campbell.pdf
  20. https://researchportal.hw.ac.uk/files/15636032/FDM_LFI_Paper_Author_Accepted_1_.pdf
  21. https://www.atmavio.pl/en/aviation/products/qar/
  22. https://www.aimt.cz/index.php/aimt/article/download/1226/268/5685
  23. http://flightrecorder.com/qar.html
  24. https://aerospace-innovations.com/redefining-aircraft-operational-data-strategies/
  25. https://www.predictiveaircraftmaintenance.com/resources/uploads/2025/02/Seth-Babcock-Ian-Galloway-final.pdf
  26. https://www.collinsaerospace.com/what-we-do/industries/military-and-defense/government-aviation-connectivity/intelisight/applications
  27. https://prd-sc102-cdn.rtx.com/-/media/ca/product-assets/marketing/v/vqar/opsinsight-vqar.pdf?rev=29e2400fe87c41078118d91f673eb2f3&hash=F632BF29C2183628AAD49FCE7A1E14B9
  28. https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/reports/quick-access-recorders-qars-356960
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368761720_Analyzing_the_operation_reliability_of_aeroengine_using_Quick_Access_Recorder_flight_data
  30. https://www.delkin.com/blog/industrial-flash-storage-in-flight-data-recorders/
  31. https://www.cad.gov.hk/english/pdf/CAD739.pdf
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950338825000270
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348245351_Fast_Decoding_of_ARINC_717_Flight_Data_Recordings
  34. https://scaledanalytics.com/2023/04/13/what-is-a-fred-file/
  35. https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/57375/what-is-the-format-of-data-stored-by-a-flight-data-recorder
  36. https://atl.aero/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/QAR-Installation.pdf
  37. https://avionica.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/miniQAR-avCM-Rep-MKII_Brochure_compressed.pdf
  38. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=isap_2015
  39. https://www.gao.gov/assets/rced-98-10.pdf
  40. https://www.navair.navy.mil/node/4126
  41. https://acsf.aero/how-flight-data-monitoring-drives-continuous-safety-improvement-in-your-operation/
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369024471_A_Review_of_the_Research_of_Quick_Access_Recorder_data
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0951832023001084
  44. https://predictronics.com/Use_Case_Aircraft.html
  45. http://ch.whu.edu.cn/en/article/doi/10.13203/j.whugis20210616
  46. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/5/2250
  47. https://fenix.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/downloadFile/1689244997258150/Thesis_73733.pdf
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354460389_B777_Hard_Landing_Trend_Analysis_based_on_Quick_Access_Recorder_QAR_Data
  49. https://services.boeing.com/news/flight-data-analytics-insight-accelerator-foqa-fdm
  50. https://www.globeair.com/g/quick-access-recorder-qar
  51. https://ffac.ch/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ICAO-Annex-6-Operation-of-Aircraft-Part-I-International-commercial-air-transport.pdf
  52. https://news.ncac.mn/uploads/bookSubject/2022-11/637dce6d8b4e3.pdf
  53. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/EAFDM_GoodPractice_FDMOversight_v1_Ed2017.pdf
  54. https://flightsafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/asw_jan09_p43-48.pdf
  55. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/APAC/RASG/SafetyTools/08-Guidance-on-the-Establishment-of-a-Flight-Data-Analysis-Programme-FDAP.pdf
  56. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/FAA_Order_2150_3C_with_Changes_1-12.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.