Hubbry Logo
Word processor (electronic device)Word processor (electronic device)Main
Open search
Word processor (electronic device)
Community hub
Word processor (electronic device)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Word processor (electronic device)
Word processor (electronic device)
Word processor (electronic device)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A Xerox 6016 Memorywriter Word Processor

A word processor is an electronic device (later a computer software application) for text, composing, editing, formatting, and printing.

The word processor was a stand-alone office machine developed in the 1960s, combining the keyboard text-entry and printing functions of an electric typewriter with a recording unit, either tape or floppy disk (as used by the Wang machine) with a simple dedicated computer processor for the editing of text.[1] Although features and designs varied among manufacturers and models, and new features were added as technology advanced, the first word processors typically featured a monochrome display and the ability to save documents on memory cards or diskettes. Later models introduced innovations such as spell-checking programs, and improved formatting options.

As the more versatile combination of personal computers and printers became commonplace, and computer software applications for word processing became popular, most business machine companies stopped manufacturing dedicated word processor machines. In 2009 there were only two U.S. companies, Classic and AlphaSmart, which still made them.[2][needs update] Many older machines, however, remain in use. Since 2009, Sentinel has offered a machine described as a "word processor", but it is more accurately a highly specialised microcomputer used for accounting and publishing.[3] In 2014, U.S. company Astrohaus launched the Freewrite series of electronic word processors.[4]

Word processing was one of the earliest applications for the personal computer in office productivity, and was the most widely used application on personal computers until the World Wide Web rose to prominence in the mid-1990s.

Although the early word processors evolved to use tag-based markup for document formatting, most modern word processors take advantage of a graphical user interface providing some form of what-you-see-is-what-you-get ("WYSIWYG") editing. Most are powerful systems consisting of one or more programs that can produce a combination of images, graphics and text, the latter handled with type-setting capability. Typical features of a modern word processor include multiple font sets, spell checking, grammar checking, a built-in thesaurus, automatic text correction, web integration, HTML conversion, pre-formatted publication projects such as newsletters and to-do lists, and much more.

Microsoft Word is the most widely used word processing software according to a user tracking system built into the software.[5] Microsoft estimates that roughly half a billion people use the Microsoft Office suite,[6] which includes Word. Many other word processing applications exist, including WordPerfect (which dominated the market from the mid-1980s to early-1990s on computers running Microsoft's MS-DOS operating system, and still (2014) is favored for legal applications), Apple's Pages application, and open source applications such as OpenOffice.org Writer, LibreOffice Writer, AbiWord, KWord, and LyX. Web-based word processors such as Office Online or Google Docs are a relatively new category.

Characteristics

[edit]

Word processors evolved dramatically once they became software programs rather than dedicated machines. They can usefully be distinguished from text editors, the category of software they evolved from.[7][8]

A text editor is a program that is used for typing, copying, pasting, and printing text (a single character, or strings of characters). Text editors do not format lines or pages. (There are extensions of text editors which can perform formatting of lines and pages: batch document processing systems, starting with TJ-2 and RUNOFF and still available in such systems as LaTeX and Ghostscript, as well as programs that implement the paged-media extensions to HTML and CSS). Text editors are now used mainly by programmers, website designers, computer system administrators, and, in the case of LaTeX, by mathematicians and scientists (for complex formulas and for citations in rare languages). They are also useful when fast startup times, small file sizes, editing speed, and simplicity of operation are valued, and when formatting is unimportant. Due to their use in managing complex software projects, text editors can sometimes provide better facilities for managing large writing projects than a word processor.[9]

Word processing added to the text editor the ability to control type style and size, to manage lines (word wrap), to format documents into pages, and to number pages. Functions now taken for granted were added incrementally, sometimes by purchase of independent providers of add-on programs. Spell checking, grammar checking and mail merge were some of the most popular add-ons for early word processors. Word processors are also capable of hyphenation, and the management and correct positioning of footnotes and endnotes.

More advanced features found in recent word processors include:

  • Collaborative editing, allowing multiple users to work on the same document.
  • Indexing assistance. (True indexing, as performed by a professional human indexer, is far beyond current technology, for the same reasons that fully automated, literary-quality machine translation is.)
  • Creation of tables of contents.
  • Management, editing, and positioning of visual material (illustrations, diagrams), and sometimes sound files.
  • Automatically managed (updated) cross-references to pages or notes.
  • Version control of a document, permitting reconstruction of its evolution.
  • Non-printing comments and annotations.
  • Generation of document statistics (characters, words, readability level, time spent editing by each user).
  • "Styles", which automate consistent formatting of text body, titles, subtitles, highlighted text, and so on.

Later desktop publishing programs were specifically designed with elaborate pre-formatted layouts for publication, offering only limited options for changing the layout, while allowing users to import text that was written using a text editor or word processor, or type the text in themselves.

History

[edit]

Word processors are descended from the Friden Flexowriter, which had two punched tape stations and permitted switching from one to the other (thus enabling what was called the "chain" or "form letter", one tape containing names and addresses, and the other the body of the letter to be sent). It did not wrap words, which was begun by IBM's Magnetic Tape Selectric Typewriter (later, Magnetic Card Selectric Typewriter).

IBM Selectric

[edit]

Expensive Typewriter, written and improved between 1961 and 1962 by Steve Piner and L. Peter Deutsch, was a text editing program that ran on a DEC PDP-1 computer at MIT. Since it could drive an IBM Selectric typewriter (a letter-quality printer), it may be considered the first-word processing program, but the term word processing itself was only introduced, by IBM's Böblingen Laboratory in the late 1960s.[citation needed]

In 1969, two software based text editing products (Astrotype and Astrocomp) were developed and marketed by Information Control Systems (Ann Arbor Michigan).[10][11][12] Both products used the Digital Equipment Corporation PDP-8 mini computer, DECtape (4” reel) randomly accessible tape drives, and a modified version of the IBM Selectric typewriter (the IBM 2741 Terminal). These 1969 products preceded CRT display-based word processors. Text editing was done using a line numbering system viewed on a paper copy inserted in the Selectric typewriter.

Evelyn Berezin invented a Selectric-based word processor in 1969, and founded the Redactron Corporation to market the $8,000 machine.[13] Redactron was sold to Burroughs Corporation in 1976, where the Redactron-II and -III were sold both as standalone units and as peripherals to the company's mainframe computers.[14]

By 1971 word processing was recognized by the New York Times as a "buzz word".[15] A 1974 Times article referred to "the brave new world of Word Processing or W/P. That's International Business Machines talk ... I.B.M. introduced W/P about five years ago for its Magnetic Tape Selectric Typewriter and other electronic razzle-dazzle."[16]

IBM defined the term in a broad and vague way as "the combination of people, procedures, and equipment which transforms ideas into printed communications," and originally used it to include dictating machines and ordinary, manually operated Selectric typewriters.[17] By the early seventies, however, the term was generally understood to mean semiautomated typewriters affording at least some form of editing and correction, and the ability to produce perfect "originals". Thus, the Times headlined a 1974 Xerox product as a "speedier electronic typewriter", but went on to describe the product, which had no screen,[18] as "a word processor rather than strictly a typewriter, in that it stores copy on magnetic tape or magnetic cards for retyping, corrections, and subsequent printout".[19]

Mainframe systems

[edit]

In the late 1960s IBM provided a program called FORMAT for generating printed documents on any computer capable of running Fortran IV. Written by Gerald M. Berns, FORMAT was described in his paper "Description of FORMAT, a Text-Processing Program" (Communications of the ACM, Volume 12, Number 3, March, 1969) as "a production program which facilitates the editing and printing of 'finished' documents directly on the printer of a relatively small (64k) computer system. It features good performance, totally free-form input, very flexible formatting capabilities including up to eight columns per page, automatic capitalization, aids for index construction, and a minimum of nontext [control elements] items." Input was normally on punched cards or magnetic tape, with up to 80capital letters and non-alphabetic characters per card. The limited typographical controls available were implemented by control sequences; for example, letters were automatically converted to lower case unless they followed a full stop, that is, the "period" character. Output could be printed on a typical line printer in all-capitals — or in upper and lower case using a special ("TN") printer chain — or could be punched as a paper tape which could be printed, in better than line printer quality, on a Flexowriter. A workalike program with some improvements, DORMAT, was developed and used at University College London.[20]

Electromechanical paper-tape-based equipment such as the Friden Flexowriter had long been available; the Flexowriter allowed for operations such as repetitive typing of form letters (with a pause for the operator to manually type in the variable information),[21] and when equipped with an auxiliary reader, could perform an early version of "mail merge". Circa 1970 it began to be feasible to apply electronic computers to office automation tasks. IBM's Mag Tape Selectric Typewriter (MT/ST) and later Mag Card Selectric (MCST) were early devices of this kind, which allowed editing, simple revision, and repetitive typing, with a one-line display for editing single lines.[22] The first novel to be written on a word processor, the IBM MT/ST, was Len Deighton's Bomber, published in 1970.[23]

Effect on office administration

[edit]

The New York Times, reporting on a 1971 business equipment trade show, said

The "buzz word" for this year's show was "word processing", or the use of electronic equipment, such as typewriters; procedures and trained personnel to maximize office efficiency. At the IBM exhibition a girl typed on an electronic typewriter. The copy was received on a magnetic tape cassette which accepted corrections, deletions, and additions and then produced a perfect letter for the boss's signature ...[15]

In 1971, a third of all working women in the United States were secretaries, and they could see that word processing would affect their careers. Some manufacturers, according to a Times article, urged that "the concept of 'word processing' could be the answer to Women's Lib advocates' prayers. Word processing will replace the 'traditional' secretary and give women new administrative roles in business and industry."[15]

The 1970s word processing concept did not refer merely to equipment, but, explicitly, to the use of equipment for "breaking down secretarial labor into distinct components, with some staff members handling typing exclusively while others supply administrative support. A typical operation would leave most executives without private secretaries. Instead one secretary would perform various administrative tasks for three or more secretaries."[24] A 1971 article said that "Some [secretaries] see W/P as a career ladder into management; others see it as a dead-end into the automated ghetto; others predict it will lead straight to the picket line." The National Secretaries Association, which defined secretaries as people who "can assume responsibility without direct supervision", feared that W/P would transform secretaries into "space-age typing pools". The article considered only the organizational changes resulting from secretaries operating word processors rather than typewriters; the possibility that word processors might result in managers creating documents without the intervention of secretaries was not considered—not surprising in an era when few managers, but most secretaries, possessed keyboarding skills.[16]

Dedicated models

[edit]

In 1972, Stephen Bernard Dorsey, Founder and President of Canadian company Automatic Electronic Systems (AES), introduced the world's first programmable word processor with a video screen. The real breakthrough by Dorsey's AES team was that their machine stored the operator's texts on magnetic disks. Texts could be retrieved from the disks simply by entering their names at the keyboard. More importantly, a text could be edited, for instance a paragraph moved to a new place, or a spelling error corrected, and these changes were recorded on the magnetic disk.

The AES machine was actually a sophisticated computer that could be reprogrammed by changing the instructions contained within a few chips.[25][26]

In 1975, Dorsey started Micom Data Systems and introduced the Micom 2000 word processor. The Micom 2000 improved on the AES design by using the Intel 8080 single-chip microprocessor, which made the word processor smaller, less costly to build and supported multiple languages.[27]

Around this time, DeltaData and Wang word processors also appeared, again with a video screen and a magnetic storage disk.

The competitive edge for Dorsey's Micom 2000 was that, unlike many other machines, it was truly programmable. The Micom machine countered the problem of obsolescence by avoiding the limitations of a hard-wired system of program storage. The Micom 2000 utilized RAM, which was mass-produced and totally programmable.[28] The Micom 2000 was said to be a year ahead of its time when it was introduced into a marketplace that represented some pretty serious competition such as IBM, Xerox and Wang Laboratories.[29]

In 1978, Micom partnered with Dutch multinational Philips and Dorsey grew Micom's sales position to number three among major word processor manufacturers, behind only IBM and Wang.[30]

Software models

[edit]
Toshiba JW-10, the first word processor for the Japanese language (1978)

The Wang was not the first CRT-based machine nor were all of its innovations unique to Wang. In the early 1970s Linolex, Lexitron and Vydec introduced pioneering word-processing systems with CRT display editing. A Canadian electronics company, Automatic Electronic Systems, had introduced a product in 1972, but went into receivership a year later. In 1976, refinanced by the Canada Development Corporation, it returned to operation as AES Data, and went on to successfully market its brand of word processors worldwide until its demise in the mid-1980s. Its first office product, the AES-90,[31] combined for the first time a CRT-screen, a floppy-disk and a microprocessor,[25][26] that is, the very same winning combination that would be used by IBM for its PC seven years later.[citation needed] The AES-90 software was able to handle French and English typing from the start, displaying and printing the texts side-by-side, a Canadian government requirement. The first eight units were delivered to the office of the then Prime Minister, Pierre Elliot Trudeau, in February 1974.[citation needed] Despite these predecessors, Wang's product was a standout, and by 1978 it had sold more of these systems than any other vendor.[32]

The phrase "word processor" rapidly came to refer to CRT-based machines similar to the AES 90. Numerous machines of this kind emerged, typically marketed by traditional office-equipment companies such as IBM, Lanier (marketing AES Data machines, re-badged), CPT, and NBI.[33] All were specialized, dedicated, proprietary systems, priced around $10,000. Cheap general-purpose computers were still for hobbyists.

Some of the earliest CRT-based machines used cassette tapes for removable-memory storage until floppy diskettes became available for this purpose - first the 8-inch floppy, then the 5¼-inch (drives by Shugart Associates and diskettes by Dysan).

Printing of documents was initially accomplished using IBM Selectric typewriters modified for ASCII-character input. These were later replaced by application-specific daisy wheel printers, first developed by Diablo, which became a Xerox company, and later by Qume. For quicker "draft" printing, dot-matrix line printers were optional alternatives with some word processors.

WYSIWYG models

[edit]
Examples of standalone word processor typefaces c. 1980–1981
Brother WP-1400D editing electronic typewriter (1994)

Electric Pencil, released in December 1976, was the first word processor software for microcomputers.[34][35][36][37][38] Software-based word processors running on general-purpose personal computers gradually displaced dedicated word processors, and the term came to refer to software rather than hardware. Some programs were modeled after particular dedicated WP hardware. MultiMate, for example, was written for an insurance company that had hundreds of typists using Wang systems, and spread from there to other Wang customers. To adapt to the smaller, more generic PC keyboard, MultiMate used stick-on labels and a large plastic clip-on template to remind users of its dozens of Wang-like functions, using the shift, alt and ctrl keys with the 10 IBM function keys and many of the alphabet keys.

Other early word-processing software required users to memorize semi-mnemonic key combinations rather than pressing keys labelled "copy" or "bold". (Many early PCs lacked cursor keys; WordStar famously used the E-S-D-X-centered "diamond" for cursor navigation, and modern vi-like editors encourage use of hjkl for navigation.) However, the price differences between dedicated word processors and general-purpose PCs, and the value added to the latter by software such as VisiCalc, were so compelling that personal computers and word processing software soon became serious competition for the dedicated machines. Word processing became the most popular use for personal computers, and unlike the spreadsheet (dominated by Lotus 1-2-3) and database (dBase) markets, WordPerfect, XyWrite, Microsoft Word, pfs:Write, and dozens of other word processing software brands competed in the 1980s; PC Magazine reviewed 57 different programs in one January 1986 issue.[35] Development of higher-resolution monitors allowed them to provide limited WYSIWYG—What You See Is What You Get, to the extent that typographical features like bold and italics, indentation, justification and margins were approximated on screen.

The mid-to-late 1980s saw the spread of laser printers, a "typographic" approach to word processing, and of true WYSIWYG bitmap displays with multiple fonts (pioneered by the Xerox Alto computer and Bravo word processing program), PostScript, and graphical user interfaces (another Xerox PARC innovation, with the Gypsy word processor which was commercialised in the Xerox Star product range). Standalone word processors adapted by getting smaller and replacing their CRTs with small character-oriented LCD displays. Some models also had computer-like features such as floppy disk drives and the ability to output to an external printer. They also got a name change, now being called "electronic typewriters" and typically occupying a lower end of the market, selling for under US$200.

During the late 1980s and into the 1990s the predominant word processing program was WordPerfect.[39] It had more than 50% of the worldwide market as late as 1995, but by 2000 Microsoft Word had up to 95% market share.[40]

MacWrite, Microsoft Word, and other word processing programs for the bit-mapped Apple Macintosh screen, introduced in 1984, were probably the first true WYSIWYG word processors to become known to many people until the introduction of Microsoft Windows. Dedicated word processors eventually became museum pieces.

See also

[edit]

Literature

[edit]
  • Matthew G. Kirschenbaum Track Changes - A Literary History of Word Processing Harvard University Press 2016 ISBN 9780674417076

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Word processor (electronic device)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

A (electronic device) is a specialized standalone machine that integrates keyboard input, electronic text storage, editing functions, and output, designed exclusively for creation and revision rather than general tasks. Emerging in the mid-1960s as an evolution from electric typewriters, these dedicated systems addressed the inefficiencies of manual retyping by enabling storage and correction of text blocks, thereby streamlining workflows before the advent of versatile personal computers. The pioneering Magnetic Tape Selectric (MT/ST), launched in , exemplified early dedicated word processors by pairing a Selectric mechanism with drives for recording, revising, and reusing text segments. Subsequent developments in the late and incorporated cathode-ray tube displays for visual editing and magnetic cards or floppy disks for storage, as in 's MagCard systems and ' text processors, which supported features like block moves, search-and-replace, and formatted output via daisy-wheel printers. These machines achieved widespread adoption in business settings during the , reducing document production time significantly compared to while maintaining a focused, non-programmable architecture optimized for clerical efficiency. By the early 1980s, dedicated word processors faced obsolescence as inexpensive personal computers, such as the IBM PC introduced in 1981, offered comparable word processing via software like alongside multitasking capabilities, rendering single-purpose hardware economically unviable. Despite their short dominance, these devices marked a critical transition in , proving the viability of digital text manipulation and laying groundwork for modern software-based word processing.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Features and Functionality

Dedicated word processors, as stand-alone electronic devices, enabled text input via specialized keyboards integrated with storage and output mechanisms, allowing operators to enter content without immediate printing. Early models, such as the IBM MT/ST introduced in 1964, used a Selectric typewriter keyboard to record text onto reusable magnetic tape cassettes capable of holding up to 28,000 characters, facilitating playback and revision without full retyping. By the mid-1970s, systems like Wang's offerings incorporated microprocessor-driven keyboards for faster, quieter entry compared to mechanical typewriters. Editing functionality centered on correcting and manipulating text blocks before final output, a core advancement over typewriters. Operators could insert, delete, or relocate sections using command codes or menu-driven interfaces; for instance, the Wang 1200 from the early 1970s supported block marking and revisions via coded instructions, while the Vydec system of 1973 allowed full-screen interactive editing on a 66-line video display. Search-and-replace operations and file merging for form letters were common, enabling reuse of combined with variable data, as seen in 800 systems that automated personalized correspondence from stored templates. Storage relied on non-volatile media to persist documents across sessions, evolving from magnetic tapes and cards to floppy disks. The MC/ST of 1969 used MagCards holding about 5,000 characters per card for page-sized storage, while later 1970s systems like Lexitron employed tape cassettes and Vydec introduced 8-inch floppy disks storing 80-100 pages. Displays, when present from 1972 onward in models like Linolex, provided CRT screens for real-time preview, reducing errors by showing formatted text before printing, unlike tape-only predecessors. Output involved high-speed, repeatable printing via integrated mechanisms such as daisy-wheel printers or enhanced typewriters. The MT/ST achieved 175 reprinting corrected pages, and Wang systems supported background across multiple workstations. Formatting options were limited to basic justifications, margins, and emphasis codes translated to print fonts, with memory typewriters storing stereotype phrases under codes for rapid assembly. Advanced models by the late added rudimentary sorting or for documents, though spell-checking remained rare until floppy-based expansions. Dedicated word processors, as specialized electronic hardware, fundamentally differed from mechanical and electric by incorporating digital memory for text storage and revision, allowing users to edit documents—via cursor navigation, deletions, insertions, and global search-and-replace—without retyping entire sections or relying on . For instance, early systems like the Magnetic Tape/Selectric (MT/ST), introduced in 1964, used to store text and automatically retyped corrected pages at speeds up to 175 words per minute, a capability absent in typewriters that produced immutable printed output upon keystroke. Electric typewriters, while automating key strikes to reduce physical effort, lacked such electronic storage and , limiting them to incremental corrections rather than comprehensive revisions. In contrast to general-purpose computers, dedicated word processors were purpose-built appliances with optimized exclusively for text entry, manipulation, formatting, and output, eschewing programmable versatility for streamlined efficiency in clerical tasks. Systems such as the series (1973) integrated video displays, storage, and daisywheel printers into a single unit costing around $18,000, but they could not execute unrelated software or perform calculations, unlike computers that required booting an operating system before loading word processing applications. This specialization positioned dedicated word processors in centralized office "typing pools" for high-volume document production, whereas personal computers like the PC (1981) democratized editing by enabling individual users to run multiple programs, including rudimentary word processors like Electric Pencil on the , ultimately rendering dedicated hardware obsolete by the mid-1980s due to greater flexibility and declining costs. Dedicated word processors also diverged from text editors and software-based word processing by providing hardware-level integration of input (keyboard), display (CRT screen), storage (floppy or tape), and output (printer ) tailored for formatted, print-ready documents with features like proportional spacing and justification, rather than plain-text handling on a shared . While software equivalents on computers offered similar editing, they depended on the host system's resources and processes, introducing overhead absent in self-contained dedicated devices designed for immediate, distraction-free text work.

Historical Development

Early Mechanical and Electro-Mechanical Precursors

The earliest mechanical precursors to electronic word processors emerged from efforts to mechanize handwriting for greater speed and legibility, beginning with Henry Mill's 1714 British patent for a "machine for transcribing letters," which described a device akin to an early but lacked surviving prototypes or commercial success. More practical advancements followed with Christopher Latham Sholes's development of the first viable in 1867, patented in 1868 alongside collaborators Carlos Glidden and Samuel W. Soule; this QWERTY-keyboard machine was commercialized by starting in 1873, enabling direct mechanical printing of text on paper via a platen and typebars, though it printed on the underside of the roller and required manual correction without storage. Subsequent refinements included the 1878 introduction of a for uppercase and lowercase letters on Remington models, and the 1897 addition of a for precise column alignment, which improved formatting efficiency but still demanded physical retyping for edits. Electro-mechanical precursors built on these by incorporating electrical power for faster operation and rudimentary storage, addressing the limitations of purely manual correction. patented an electric in 1872, but functional models did not appear until the , offering powered key strikes for reduced operator fatigue without memory capabilities. The Blickensderfer Electric , demonstrated in 1901 at the , represented an early attempt at electrification but failed commercially due to inconsistent electrical standards. By the 1930s, IBM's Electromatic gained business adoption for its electric mechanism, which boosted typing speeds to over 100 compared to manual machines' 40-60, though editing remained destructive. A key innovation came from the M. Shultz Company's 1930s automatic , which used punch-coded paper rolls to store and retrieve text, allowing automated playback for repetitive documents like form letters, thus introducing basic non-destructive revision by editing the punch tape separately. The , developed from designs originating in the and entering production in the , advanced this further as an electro-mechanical printing terminal resembling an electric but equipped with dual punched-paper-tape stations for recording input and playback output, enabling operators to compose on one tape, revise it manually or via splicing, and print from another—effectively the first device permitting iterative text manipulation without full retyping. Priced around $2,900 in the late 1960s (equivalent to approximately $25,000 in 2023 dollars adjusted for ), it supported up to 1,000 characters per tape and found applications in early interfaces, , and document replication, bridging mechanical typing toward dedicated word processing by decoupling input from final output. These systems, reliant on physical media like tape or rolls rather than electronic memory, laid causal groundwork for later electronic devices by demonstrating the productivity gains from separable storage and reproduction, though they were limited by mechanical wear, tape fragility, and lack of on-screen preview.

1960s-1970s: Dedicated Systems and Mainframes

The development of dedicated word processors in the 1960s marked the transition from mechanical typewriters to electro-mechanical systems capable of storing and revising text electronically. IBM introduced the Magnetic Tape Selectric Typewriter (MT/ST) in July 1964, recognized as the first commercial dedicated word processor. This standalone device integrated an IBM Selectric electric typewriter with magnetic tape drives for recording up to approximately 25,000 characters, allowing operators to edit documents by searching, inserting, deleting, or correcting text without retyping entire pages. Priced at around $10,000, the MT/ST operated "blind," meaning revisions required reprinting sections to verify changes, as it lacked a display screen. It was marketed specifically for office document production, reducing errors and time compared to manual typewriters, and remained in use until its discontinuation in 1983. By the early 1970s, dedicated word processors evolved into fully electronic systems incorporating cathode-ray tube (CRT) displays and microprocessor-based processing, enabling real-time visual . Wang Laboratories launched the Wang 1200 in November 1971, an early electronic model featuring a CRT terminal for on-screen text manipulation, storage, and basic formatting functions, positioning it as a direct competitor to IBM's tape-based systems. Designed by Harold Koplow, the Wang 1200 supported document creation for business correspondence and reports, with multiple terminals connectable to a for shared access, though initial models were limited in memory and lacked advanced features like proportional spacing. In 1973, Vydec introduced its Word Processing System, pioneering the use of for non-volatile storage and a video terminal for what was then considered modern interactive , priced at approximately $12,000—significantly less than mainframe alternatives. These systems, along with contemporaries from Lexitron and Linolex, emphasized CRT-based "what you see is what you get" () previews, or magnetic card media, and dedicated keyboards, proliferating in corporate offices to streamline secretarial workflows. Parallel to standalone dedicated devices, mainframe computers in the were adapted for word processing through operating systems and terminal networks, supporting centralized document editing for multiple users. Large organizations leveraged and similar mainframes with software like early text editors or custom applications, where dumb terminals allowed remote input and revision of documents stored on central disks, though such setups prioritized batch printing over interactive editing and required programming knowledge for full utilization. This approach contrasted with dedicated systems by enabling scalability across departments but incurring higher costs and complexity, often limiting adoption to enterprises with existing mainframe infrastructure rather than displacing purpose-built word processors in routine office tasks. By the mid-, the dedicated model dominated due to its affordability, simplicity, and focus on non-technical users, foreshadowing the shift toward microprocessor-driven standalone units.

1980s: Software on Personal Computers

The 1980s marked the shift of word processing from dedicated hardware to software applications running on general-purpose personal computers, enabled by the rise of affordable microcomputers like the IBM PC introduced in August 1981. This transition democratized access, as users could perform word processing alongside other tasks on machines costing under $3,000, compared to specialized systems exceeding $10,000. Early software emphasized efficiency on text-mode displays, relying on keyboard shortcuts and non-graphical interfaces rather than visual previews, reflecting hardware limitations like 80-column monochrome CRTs and limited RAM (typically 64-256 KB). WordStar, originally released in 1979 for systems by MicroPro International, dominated the market after its port in April 1982 (version 3.0). It featured programmable function keys, block moves, and mail-merge capabilities, but used complex control codes (e.g., ^K for menus) due to the absence of standardized on early PCs. By mid-decade, held the leading position in reader surveys for PC-compatible software, with sales driving MicroPro to revenues over $80 million annually by 1983. Competitors emerged to address WordStar's ergonomics and speed issues. WordPerfect, developed by Satellite Software International (later WordPerfect Corporation) and first released in 1980 for Data General minicomputers before porting to MS-DOS, offered macro support, footnotes, and superior table handling. It overtook WordStar by 1987, capturing over 50% market share among DOS users by emphasizing reveal codes for precise formatting control, which appealed to professional typists transitioning from typewriters. MultiMate, launched in 1982 by Softword (later MultiMate International), emulated the Wang dedicated word processor's interface, gaining traction in offices with legacy training; it ranked third in 1984 surveys. Microsoft Word entered in October 1983 (version 1.0 for ), introducing support and rudimentary elements via graphics modes, though still primarily text-based. Priced at $495, it targeted business users but trailed leaders initially, with under 10% share by 1984 amid compatibility challenges on 8088 processors. By decade's end, these programs processed millions of documents daily, boosting by 20-50% over typewriters per empirical studies, as revisions became iterative rather than linear. The software ecosystem spurred peripherals like dot-matrix printers (e.g., MX-80, 1980) for draft output and daisy-wheel for finals, solidifying PCs as staples.

1990s-2000s: GUI Dominance and Market Consolidation

The advent of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) in the early , particularly with the release of Microsoft Windows 3.0 in May 1990, accelerated the transition to (what you see is what you get) word processing on personal computers, rendering command-line interfaces obsolete for mainstream use. for Windows, launched in November 1989, capitalized on this shift by offering intuitive mouse-driven editing, toolbars, and real-time formatting previews, which contrasted sharply with the text-based navigation of DOS-dominant competitors. By 1991, as Windows adoption surged—reaching over 3 million licenses sold—Word's integration with the OS ecosystem began eroding the market position of rivals like , which relied heavily on its DOS version 5.1, praised for power-user features but criticized for a steep in GUI environments. WordPerfect, which commanded the majority of the word processing market through the late 1980s and into the early due to its efficiency on text-only systems, struggled with delayed and inferior Windows ports; its version 6.0 for Windows, released in 1993, failed to match Word's native feel, contributing to a rapid loss of share as corporate users standardized on bundles. By 1994, had emerged as the leading word processor globally, benefiting from aggressive bundling in Office 4.0 (1994) and superior compatibility with emerging internet standards like export. Market data from the period indicates Word's dominance solidified by the late , with estimates placing its share at over 90% by 2000, driven by network effects in enterprise deployments and developer focus on Windows-specific optimizations that 's parent, , underinvested in after a 1994 acquisition. This consolidation marginalized alternatives like Corel WordPerfect and Ami Pro, which were acquired or faded, leaving with effective control over desktop word processing standards. Dedicated hardware word processors, once common in offices for their simplicity and security, virtually vanished during this era as versatile, cost-effective PCs supplanted them; by the mid-1990s, the for standalone devices had contracted sharply, with production ceasing for models like those from , which filed for bankruptcy in 1992 amid the software pivot. The GUI era's emphasis on modular software ecosystems further entrenched this trend, enabling features like spell-checking via integrated dictionaries and macro that hardware units could not economically match, while falling PC hardware prices—dropping below $1,000 for capable systems by 1995—democratized access and reduced demand for specialized appliances. Consequently, word processing consolidated around a few GUI-centric applications on general-purpose devices, setting the stage for bundled productivity suites that dominated enterprise and consumer markets through the 2000s.

2010s-Present: Cloud, Collaboration, and AI Enhancements

The transition to cloud-based word processing accelerated in the , driven by subscription models and web accessibility. Microsoft launched Office 365 on June 28, 2011, introducing cloud-hosted versions of Word with features like online editing and storage via , shifting from perpetual licenses to recurring subscriptions for enterprises and individuals. , initially released in 2006, gained widespread adoption in the for its browser-based interface, enabling document creation without local installations and fostering dependency on connectivity for core functionality. Real-time collaboration emerged as a defining feature, allowing multiple users to edit documents simultaneously. supported this capability from its inception, using algorithms to merge concurrent changes without conflicts, which became standard for distributed teams by the mid-2010s. integrated real-time co-authoring in 2014, extending it across desktop, web, and mobile versions within Office 365, with version history and presence indicators to track contributors. These tools reduced email-based revisions, though they introduced challenges like managing edit conflicts in complex documents. AI enhancements began integrating in the late , initially via third-party tools, evolving to native features by the . Grammarly, launched in 2009, offered browser extensions and add-ins for by the mid-2010s, providing grammar, style, and plagiarism checks powered by . introduced AI-driven Editor in 2022, adding tone detection, conciseness suggestions, and summarization to Word within . In 2023, Copilot became generally available on November 1, enabling generative tasks in Word such as drafting outlines, rewriting sections, and inserting data visualizations based on user prompts and document context. incorporated similar AI via extensions and Workspace features, including smart compose for completion, though adoption lagged behind Microsoft's enterprise-focused integrations. These developments prioritized efficiency but raised concerns over data privacy, as AI processing often relies on transmission of user content.

Technical Components

Hardware Elements in Dedicated Devices

Dedicated word processors from the 1960s through the 1980s employed specialized hardware optimized for text entry, editing, storage, and printing, often integrating components like custom keyboards, cathode-ray tube (CRT) displays, microprocessors, non-volatile storage media, and printer interfaces into compact, standalone units. These systems prioritized reliability and speed for office document production over general computing versatility, with early models using or cards for storage and later ones adopting floppy disks. Key input hardware included ergonomic keyboards with dedicated function keys for commands such as , or justification, reducing reliance on complex key combinations found in general-purpose machines. Displays typically consisted of CRT screens capable of rendering 1,000 to 4,000 characters, allowing real-time preview of formatted text in fixed- or proportional-width fonts, a significant advance over blind typing on typewriters. Processing units featured dedicated microprocessors, such as the in the Displaywriter System introduced in June 1980, which handled text buffering, search-replace operations, and formatting algorithms efficiently within constrained memory environments often limited to 64-256 KB of RAM. Storage mechanisms evolved from IBM's Magnetic Tape Selectric Typewriter (MT/ST) in 1964, which used reel-to-reel cartridges holding up to 10 pages of text, to floppy disk units in 1970s systems like the Wang System 5, providing capacities of 100-500 KB per diskette for multi-document workflows. Output hardware emphasized letter-quality printing via daisy-wheel or Selectric mechanisms; for example, the IBM Displaywriter supported the 5215 Selectric Element Printer, capable of 12 characters per second with interchangeable type elements for varied fonts. These components were interconnected via cables, forming self-contained systems costing $10,000 to $20,000, reflecting their enterprise-oriented design before personal computers commoditized similar functionality.

Software Architecture and Algorithms

Dedicated word processors employed architectures optimized for text-centric operations, typically comprising or lightweight operating systems loaded into ROM or RAM on embedded microprocessors, such as the used in Wang Models 10, 20, and 30 from 1976 onward. These systems prioritized low-latency input handling from keyboards and CRT displays, with central processing units managing shared resources in clustered configurations—e.g., Wang Model 20 linking up to three workstations via cabling for collaborative editing, while Model 30 scaled to 14 stations with hard disk support for persistent storage. architectures focused on buffer allocation for active documents, often limiting file sizes to hardware constraints like 64 KB per workstation, enabling real-time screen refreshes without general-purpose multitasking overhead found in later personal computers. Document representation in these systems utilized sequential streams of ASCII characters interspersed with non-printing control codes to denote formatting directives, such as font changes, margins, or emphasis, rather than structured markup languages. Storage media varied by era and model: early MT/ST units from 1964 relied on cassettes holding up to 28,000 characters per reel, while 1970s advancements like Vydec systems (introduced 1973) shifted to floppy disks for , facilitating faster revisions without full rewinds. Wang implementations stored documents in proprietary binary formats on 8-inch floppies or fixed disks, embedding metadata for page breaks and tabs to reconstruct layout during retrieval or printing. Core algorithms centered on efficient string manipulation for editing tasks, inheriting techniques from line editors like QED, including linear scans for search-and-replace operations via matching and substitution, often with global flags to process entire documents. Insertion and deletion leveraged dynamic buffers, typically array-based with gap relocation to minimize shifts in fixed memory, supporting block moves by copying delimited text segments. Formatting routines applied rule-based line breaking for , distributing extra spaces via greedy algorithms for left-justified text or micro-adjustments for full justification, with rudimentary hyphenation dictionaries checking suffix rules against word ends to avoid orphans or widows. Background queuing allowed printing threads—using spooler-like mechanisms—to rasterize pages independently, freeing the foreground for edits, as in Wang's multi-document handling. Advanced implementations introduced screen rendering algorithms tailored to display capabilities; for example, the (1981) used bitmapped graphics to simulate output, applying proportional spacing and font metrics during redraws to approximate final print appearance on 1024x808 resolution screens. Displaywriter systems from 1980 incorporated similar vector-based formatting for video previews, processing control codes into display lists for efficient updates, though reliant on floppy-based swapping for documents exceeding onboard RAM. Menu-driven command interpreters in Wang OIS parsed user inputs into procedural sequences, enabling macros for repetitive tasks like table generation or via template substitution algorithms. These designs emphasized determinism over flexibility, ensuring consistent performance on limited hardware but constraining extensibility compared to programmable PC software.

Input, Editing, and Output Mechanisms

Dedicated word processors relied on specialized keyboards for text input, typically featuring standard layouts enhanced with dedicated function keys for formatting commands such as bold, underline, centering, and justification. These keyboards connected directly to the system's processor, enabling immediate entry of alphanumeric characters and control codes into electronic , a significant advance over mechanical typewriters that required physical correction. Wang workstations, for example, incorporated keyboards with top-row keys dual-purposed for word processing functions like text insertion and deletion in interactive modes. Editing mechanisms centered on cathode-ray tube (CRT) displays, which provided visual feedback for real-time text manipulation, contrasting with tape-based systems that lacked on-screen preview. Operators navigated documents using cursor keys and commands to insert, delete, or relocate blocks of text, with features like search-and-replace and global formatting applied via keyboard shortcuts or menu selections. Early dedicated systems employed coded representations for styles (e.g., escape sequences for italics), while mid-1970s models like those from Lexitron introduced video screens for more intuitive editing, reducing errors through immediate visibility. Output primarily occurred through integrated or attached printers optimized for office correspondence, with daisy-wheel mechanisms dominating for their ability to produce letter-quality, proportional-spaced text at speeds suitable for batch printing. These printers used rotating wheels with embossed characters, allowing font changes via wheel swaps and automated justification, essential for professional documents. Draft output often utilized dot-matrix or thermal printers for speed, while final versions connected to Selectric-like mechanisms for high-fidelity reproduction. Storage media such as magnetic tapes or cassettes facilitated document transfer to printers, enabling revisions without retyping entire pages.

Economic and Societal Impacts

Productivity Improvements and

The adoption of dedicated word processors in offices during the 1970s and 1980s enabled rapid text editing, deletion, insertion, and reformatting without retyping entire documents, contrasting with manual typewriters that required physical corrections or full rewrites for revisions. This capability stemmed from and display screens, allowing users to review and modify content in real-time, which reduced error rates and iteration times in document production. Empirical assessments in organizational settings documented substantial gains for secretarial and administrative tasks. A report on the implementation of word processing in federal courts found that the increased secretarial by 200 to 300 percent compared to typewriter-based workflows, primarily through minimized retyping and enhanced revision . The same analysis indicated a halving of required hours for equivalent output volumes, as stored drafts facilitated multiple passes without cumulative labor. Further evidence from evaluations corroborated these effects, attributing gains to the mechanization of repetitive formatting and correction processes, which elevated output per worker-hour in document-heavy environments. However, realized improvements depended on user training and ; initial adoption phases often showed moderated gains due to acclimation periods, though long-term metrics consistently reflected net positive impacts on throughput. These findings underscore the causal link between electronic storage and manipulable text representation, which dismantled prior bottlenecks in mechanical reproduction.

Employment Shifts and Skill Disruptions

The introduction of dedicated word processors in the 1970s and their widespread adoption on personal computers in the significantly reduced the demand for specialized and secretarial roles, as professionals increasingly handled their own drafting and revisions. This shift dismantled traditional typing pools, where clerical staff previously retyped multiple times for corrections, leading to centralized word processing departments that consolidated tasks and devalued individual secretarial expertise. By 1982, employers reported laying off secretaries partly due to word processors enabling fewer staff to manage higher volumes of work, exacerbating economic pressures on clerical . Empirical data reflects this displacement: U.S. records show that word processors and typists, who numbered in the hundreds of thousands during the peak of manual typing in the and early , declined to 34,193 employed workers by 2023, predominantly women (87.9%). and administrative support occupations, which peaked at 12.7% of the U.S. in 1980, have since contracted as redistributed routine tasks, with projections estimating a further 38% decline in word processor and typist openings by 2033 due to ongoing digital substitution. While not a direct job eliminator in every case, the technology's indirect effects—such as enabling executives to bypass intermediaries—amplified clerical reductions, though some roles evolved into administrative support requiring coordination over pure transcription. On skills, word processors disrupted traditional competencies like flawless manual typewriting and carbon-copy handling, necessitating rapid upskilling in software , keyboard shortcuts, and on-screen , which many older clerical workers struggled to acquire amid gaps. This transition favored younger or tech-adaptable employees, contributing to age-related obsolescence in office roles from onward, as computerization prioritized over mechanical precision. Productivity gains were evident, with easier revisions reducing drudgery and enabling more iterative drafting, but studies indicate mixed impacts on output quality: while revision strategies improved for experienced users, novice writers sometimes produced less structured text due to over-reliance on delete-and-retype ease, potentially eroding deliberate planning honed by pen-and-paper constraints. Overall, the skill pivot elevated general computer proficiency as a baseline for office survival, marginalizing those without it while broadening roles for survivors into multifaceted administrative functions.

Market Competition and Innovation Dynamics

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the dedicated word processor market featured intense competition among specialized hardware manufacturers, including Wang Laboratories, IBM, Xerox, and NBI, driving rapid feature enhancements amid growing office automation demand. Wang Laboratories achieved dominance by 1980 with its VS series, introduced in 1976, which pioneered affordable CRT-based desktop editing and displaced earlier magnetic-card systems like IBM's MT/ST from 1964. More than 80% of the 2,000 largest U.S. companies incorporated Wang office equipment by the early 1980s, reflecting its reliability for high-volume typing pools. Competitors such as NBI mounted challenges through aggressive pricing and networked systems, prompting industry-wide discounts by 1983 as market saturation loomed. This rivalry accelerated innovations like multi-user capabilities and rudimentary search-replace functions, though systems remained proprietary and costly, typically ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 per unit. The sector's billion-dollar scale by the mid-1980s masked underlying vulnerabilities, as dedicated devices prioritized task-specific optimization over versatility, limiting in diverse environments. Firms like exited the market in 1983 after meager $34 million in 1982 word processing revenue, underscoring for latecomers against incumbents' installed bases. Innovation stagnated on hardware lock-in, with upgrades requiring full system replacements rather than modular software updates, contrasting the modular evolution in general-purpose . The rise of personal computers from 1983 onward disrupted these dynamics, as falling hardware prices—IBM PCs under $3,000—enabled software like to replicate word processing at fraction of dedicated costs while supporting additional tasks. By the late , PC-based solutions captured the market through advantages, including third-party software iteration and compatibility, rendering dedicated hardware obsolete as versatility trumped specialization. This shift exemplified causal realism in technology adoption: general-purpose platforms outcompeted niches by reducing total ownership costs and fostering sustained innovation decoupled from rigid hardware cycles.

Criticisms and Limitations

Early Adoption Challenges

The high cost of dedicated word processors posed a significant barrier to widespread adoption in the 1970s and early 1980s, with systems like the IBM Magnetic Tape/Selectric Typewriter (MT/ST), introduced in 1964, retailing for approximately $15,000 per unit by the late 1970s—equivalent to over $60,000 in 2020 dollars—and more advanced models reaching up to $100,000. This pricing confined early implementations primarily to large corporations and government agencies capable of justifying the investment through centralized typing pools, rather than individual or small-office use. Operators faced a steep transitioning from manual or electric typewriters, necessitating formal training programs that could span weeks to master features like magnetic tape storage, text revision, and basic formatting commands. For instance, Wang systems deployed in 1984 required dedicated support for troubleshooting and operator , highlighting how inadequate preparation led to underutilization and frustration among clerical staff accustomed to simpler mechanical workflows. This training overhead, combined with the need for specialized maintenance technicians, increased operational costs and slowed integration into office routines. Technical limitations further hindered adoption, including restricted storage capacity—such as the MT/ST's reliance on 1/2-inch magnetic tapes holding limited text volumes—and rudimentary editing capabilities that lacked modern search-replace or multi-font support, making them less versatile than anticipated for complex documents. Early hardware reliability issues, including tape degradation and mechanical failures in printer integrations, demanded frequent vendor interventions, eroding confidence in these devices as dependable alternatives to typewriters. Organizational resistance stemmed from fears of deskilling typists and disrupting established secretarial hierarchies, with some viewing the technology as an impersonal tool that prioritized speed over craft, contributing to cautious rollout in conservative business environments.

Compatibility and Lock-in Issues

Dedicated word processors, as standalone electronic devices, frequently utilized proprietary file formats and hardware-specific storage media, such as custom floppy disks or magnetic tapes, which precluded seamless between systems from different manufacturers. For example, ' Office Information System (OIS), introduced in 1977, employed undisclosed proprietary formats stored on dedicated disks, deliberately shielded from third-party scrutiny to maintain control. This design choice inherently fostered , binding users—often large organizations with extensive document archives—to the originating vendor for ongoing access, editing, and maintenance, as alternative hardware lacked the necessary decoding capabilities. The absence of standardized formats amplified compatibility barriers; documents created on one device, like the Wang VS series minicomputers, could not be directly imported into rivals such as NBI or CPT systems without specialized, vendor-provided conversion tools, which were infrequent and imperfect. Wang's proprietary architecture extended to its minicomputers, which resisted integration with non-Wang peripherals or networks, further entrenching dependency. of resultant lock-in emerged during Wang's decline: by the early 1990s, as personal computers proliferated with open architectures, corporate users encountered substantial hurdles in migrating terabytes of proprietary files, often resorting to labor-intensive rekeying or costly proprietary utilities that preserved only basic text, stripping embedded formatting and macros. Wang's Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on August 18, 1992, exemplified the perils of such lock-in, leaving thousands of installations—once comprising up to 80% of some firms' —with obsolete hardware and irrecoverable absent vendor support. Post-failure analyses attributed Wang's erosion from over 20% in dedicated word processing during the to near-zero by 1992 partly to this rigidity, as clients defected to versatile PC software like , which supported rudimentary import filters but demanded manual intervention for fidelity. Similar dynamics afflicted other dedicated systems, underscoring how proprietary isolation, while initially securing competitive moats, causally precipitated silos and elevated switching costs, hastening the category's obsolescence against modular computing paradigms.

Effects on Writing Processes and Quality

Word processors enabled a shift from linear, paper-based writing processes—characterized by sequential drafting and laborious manual revisions—to more iterative and recursive approaches. Users could insert, delete, and rearrange text with minimal physical effort, reducing the cognitive and temporal costs of editing compared to typewriters or handwriting. This facilitated greater emphasis on revision cycles, as evidenced by a controlled experiment with college freshmen where word processor users made significantly more substantive revisions than those using paper, leading to enhanced structural coherence in compositions. Empirical studies consistently demonstrate that word processing increases the quantity of output, with users producing longer texts due to reduced mechanical barriers. For instance, eighth-grade students experienced with computers generated writings averaging 20-30% longer when using word processors versus , attributing this to easier expansion and reorganization. Revision strategies also improved, with higher rates of local (word-level) and global (structural) changes; one analysis of student protocols found word processor groups revising 1.5-2 times more frequently than groups. On writing quality, results are mixed but generally positive for holistic scores when paired with instruction. Meta-analyses indicate modest gains in overall composition quality ( ~0.3-0.5 standard deviations), particularly for or weaker writers, as tools like spell-check and formatting prompts encourage polishing. A year-long study of middle schoolers showed word processing groups outperforming controls in coherence and , though benefits diminished without explicit writing . However, word processors do not universally enhance quality over , especially in cognitive encoding. Recent reveals handwriting activates more brain regions for formation and retention, with yielding shallower ; schoolchildren typing essays scored 10-15% lower on subsequent tasks than those handwriting. Inexperienced typists sometimes produced lower-quality drafts due to over-reliance on without deep initial composition. These findings suggest word processors excel in refinement but may undermine foundational skills like orthographic learning when substituting for manual writing.

References

  1. https://web.stanford.edu/~bkunde/fb-press/articles/wdprhist.html
  2. https://www.hnf.de/en/permanent-exhibition/exhibition-areas/computers-in-business-and-professions-1970-to-1980/word-processing-systems-to-make-writing-easy.html
  3. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED068648.pdf
  4. https://www.tomandmaria.com/Tom/Writing/Annals2006WP.pdf
  5. https://history.computer.org/pioneers/wang.html
  6. https://www.nytimes.com/1974/10/08/archives/xerox-is-introducing-a-speedier-electric-typewriter-xerox-enters.html
  7. https://www.productevolution.org/2018/02/on-the-origin-of-the-word-processor/
  8. https://homepage.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/flexo/
  9. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/36362
  10. https://www.ricomputermuseum.org/collections-gallery/small-systems-at-ricm/ibm-mtst-system
  11. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=819
  12. https://buttondown.com/blog/mail-merge-history
  13. http://www.wang1200.org/
  14. https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102746931/
  15. https://dailytechnewsshow.com/2023/09/28/about-word-processors/
  16. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/mahc.2006.76
  17. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/03/wordstar-a-writers-word-processor/
  18. http://www.trs-80.org/wordstar.html
  19. https://www.dosdays.co.uk/topics/Software/micropro.php
  20. https://medium.com/engage/early-days-in-the-billion-dollar-word-processing-wars-f0d37b799325
  21. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpMm1n7dwCQ
  22. https://www.dosdays.co.uk/topics/Software/wordperfect.php
  23. https://personal.utdallas.edu/~liebowit/book/wordprocessor/word.html
  24. https://www.company-histories.com/WordPerfect-Corporation-Company-History.html
  25. https://winworldpc.com/product/microsoft-word
  26. https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2014/03/25/microsoft-makes-source-code-for-ms-dos-and-word-for-windows-available-to-public/
  27. https://toweringskills.com/writing/ascendency-of-word-processing-and-microsoft-word/
  28. https://history.computer.org/annals/extras/wp-timeline28-4.html
  29. https://lowendmac.com/2008/rise-of-microsoft-monopoly/
  30. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/computer-science/microsoft-word
  31. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-36033-6_2
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373932632_Word_Processing_Software_The_Rise_of_MS_Word
  33. https://news.microsoft.com/source/2011/06/28/microsoft-launches-office-365-globally/
  34. https://www.geekwire.com/2018/new-word-processor-wars-fresh-crop-productivity-apps-trying-reinvent-workday/
  35. https://www.multicollab.com/blog/a-deep-dive-into-the-evolution-of-collaborative-editing-trends/
  36. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-life-hacks/writing/history-of-microsoft-word
  37. https://www.grammarly.com/microsoft-office
  38. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoft_365blog/introducing-new-ai-enhancements-in-microsoft-365-new-features-coming-to-microsof/3643499
  39. https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/09/21/announcing-microsoft-copilot-your-everyday-ai-companion/
  40. https://reelmind.ai/blog/google-docs-word-ai-for-seamless-editing-and-collaboration
  41. http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/6580_Displaywriter/G544-0851-3_IBM_Displaywriter_System_General_Information_Manual_Oct81.pdf
  42. https://sharktastica.co.uk/resources/docs/pdf/IBM_G544-0851-5_6580-General-Info-Manual_1982_bitsavers.pdf
  43. https://www.ricomputermuseum.org/collections-gallery/small-systems-at-ricm/ibm-displaywriter
  44. http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/wang/vs/700-7611B_Word_Processing_Reference_Man_198308.pdf
  45. https://www.wang2200.org/docs/software/2200WordProcessingOperatorsGuide.700-6937.6-82.pdf
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373931783_The_Beginnings_of_Word_Processing_A_Historical_Account
  47. https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/2012/WordProc.pdf
  48. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA132764.pdf
  49. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/2135/chapter/3
  50. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-23509153
  51. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228652750.pdf
  52. https://www.nytimes.com/1982/08/16/style/for-secretaries-now-it-s-word-processors.html
  53. https://datausa.io/profile/soc/word-processors-typists
  54. https://forklightning.substack.com/p/the-past-present-and-future-of-office
  55. https://willrobotstakemyjob.com/word-processors-and-typists
  56. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002218568002200201?icid=int.sj-abstract.similar-articles.1
  57. https://www.csmonitor.com/1980/0710/071004.html
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10079279/
  59. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1505&context=grp
  60. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2663948
  61. https://www.nytimes.com/1975/05/04/archives/word-processing-comes-of-age-the-electric-typewriter-is-basic-to.html
  62. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/06/how-to-write-a-history-of-writing-software/489173/
  63. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/comparison-historical-resistance-word-processors-modern-jody-dulberg-eq2vc
  64. http://justsolve.archiveteam.org/wiki/Wang_OIS
  65. https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/19920823/1508984/once-booming-wang-laboratories-failed-to-heed-the-changing-market
  66. https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-great-failure-of-wang-laboratories-the-david-to-ibms-goliath/
  67. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/08/19/business/wang-files-for-bankruptcy-5000-jobs-to-be-cut.html
  68. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00144729
  69. http://personal.kent.edu/~fersin/owston.pdf
  70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266908393_The_Effects_of_Word_Processing_on_Students%27_Writing_Quality_and_Revision_Strategies_Authors
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251359551_Word_processing_programs_and_weaker_writersreaders_A_meta-analysis_of_research_findings
  72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED267763.pdf
  73. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc279365/m2/1/high_res_d/1002727190-bridges.pdf
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11943480/
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-03369-x
  76. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2190/XTDU-J5L2-WTPP-91W2
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.