Hubbry Logo
Scottish Parliament constituencies and electoral regionsScottish Parliament constituencies and electoral regionsMain
Open search
Scottish Parliament constituencies and electoral regions
Community hub
Scottish Parliament constituencies and electoral regions
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Scottish Parliament constituencies and electoral regions
Scottish Parliament constituencies and electoral regions
from Wikipedia

The Scottish Parliament (Holyrood), created by the Scotland Act 1998, has used a system of constituencies and electoral regions since the first general election in 1999.

The parliament has 73 constituencies, each electing one Member of the Scottish Parliament (MSP) by the plurality (first-past-the-post) system of voting, and eight additional member regions, each electing seven additional MSPs. Each region is a group of constituencies, and the D'Hondt method of allocating additional member seats from party lists is used to produce a form of proportional representation for each region. The total number of parliamentary seats is 129. For lists of MSPs, see Member of the Scottish Parliament.

Boundaries of Holyrood and House of Commons (Westminster) constituencies are subject to review by the Boundaries Scotland, and prior to the Scottish Parliament (Constituencies) Act 2004 reviews of Scottish Westminster constituencies would have been also reviews of Holyrood constituencies. The Arbuthnott Commission, in its final report, January 2006, recommended that council area boundaries and Holyrood and Scottish Westminster constituency boundaries should all be reviewed together. This recommendation has not been implemented.

Boundaries

[edit]

1999–2011

[edit]

Until the 2005 general election the first-past-the-post constituencies were the same as for the House of Commons (United Kingdom Parliament, Westminster), except for Orkney and Shetland, which were separate constituencies at Holyrood, but not at Westminster. The Scottish Parliament (Constituencies) Act 2004 enabled a new set of House of Commons constituencies to be formed in Scotland in 2005,[1] reducing their number and, therefore, the number of Scottish Members of Parliament (MPs) to 59, without change to the Holyrood constituencies and the number of MSPs.

1999 boundaries were used also for the 2003 and 2007 elections.

2011–2026

[edit]

The first periodical review of boundaries of Scottish Parliament constituencies[2] was announced on 3 July 2007,[3] and the commission's final recommendations were implemented for the 2011 Scottish Parliament election.

Total numbers of constituencies, regions, and MSPs remain at, respectively, 73, 8, and 129.

from 2026

[edit]

New constituencies and regions were created by the second periodic review of Scottish Parliament boundaries.[4]

Historical representation by party

[edit]

  Conservative   Independent   Labour   Liberal Democrats   Scottish National Party   Scottish Senior Citizens Unity   Scottish Socialist

Constituency Members
1999–2011 2011–2026 2026– 1999 2003 2007 2011 14 2016 2021 2026
Airdrie and Shotts Whitefield Neil TBD
Almond Valley in Lothian region TBD
Bathgate in Lothian region (Linlithgow) TBD
Coatbridge and Chryston E. Smith MacGregor TBD
Cumbernauld and Kilsyth Craigie Hepburn TBD
Falkirk East Falkirk East and Linlithgow Peattie A. MacDonald Thomson TBD
Falkirk West Canavan Matheson TBD
Motherwell and Wishaw McConnell Pentland Adamson TBD
Hamilton North and Bellshill Uddingston and Bellshill M. McMahon Lyle Callaghan TBD
East Kilbride A. Kerr Fabiani Stevenson in South Scotland region
Hamilton South Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse McCabe McKelvie in South Scotland region
Kilmarnock and Loudoun Jamieson Coffey in South Scotland region
Central Scotland (list seats) Gorrie O'Donnell Griffin TBD
A. Wilson Leckie Hepburn S. McMahon Leonard TBD
Neil McCulloch Lennon TBD
Fabiani Lyle E. Smith Mackay TBD
Matheson McKelvie Adamson G. Simpson TBD
Paterson Swinburne J. Wilson --> Harris Kerr TBD
McIntosh Mitchell Gallacher TBD

Glasgow

[edit]

  Conservative   Green   Independent   Labour   Liberal Democrats   Scottish National Party   Scottish Socialist   Solidarity

Constituency Members
1999–2011 2011–2026 2026– 1999 00 02 2003 05 06 2007 09 2011 2016 2021 2026
Glasgow Anniesland Dewar Butler Kidd
Glasgow Cathcart Glasgow Cathcart and Pollok Watson Gordon Dornan
Glasgow Govan Glasgow Southside Jackson Sturgeon
Glasgow Kelvin Glasgow Central McNeill White Stewart
Glasgow Rutherglen Rutherglen Rutherglen and Cambuslang Hughes Kelly Haughey
Glasgow Shettleston Glasgow Baillieston and Shettleston McAveety Mason
Glasgow Maryhill Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn Glasgow Kelvin and Maryhill Ferguson Doris
Glasgow Springburn Glasgow Provan Glasgow Easterhouse and Springburn Martin McKee
Glasgow Pollok Lamont Yousaf abolished
Glasgow Baillieston Curran abolished
Glasgow (list seats) Gibson P. Harvie
Sturgeon Doris Sarwar
White Yousaf Lamont Sweeney
Elder --> Kane Ahmad McLaughlin Malik Kelly Glancy
Sheridan --> Kidd D. Smith McNeill
R. Brown McTaggart Tomkins Gulhane
Aitken R. Davidson Wells

Highlands and Islands

[edit]

  Conservative   Green   Independent   Labour   Liberal Democrats   Scottish National Party

1999 2003 06 2007 2011 12 2016 17 19 2021
Argyll and Bute Lyon Mather Russell Minto
Caithness, Sutherland and Ross / Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross (1999–2011) Stone Gibson G. Ross Todd
Inverness and Nairn / Inverness East,Nairn and Lochaber (1999–2011) F. Ewing
Moray M. Ewing Lochhead
Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch / Ross, Skye and Inverness West (1999–2011) Munro Thompson Forbes
Na h-Eileanan an Iar / Western Isles (1999–2011) Morrison Allan
Orkney J. Wallace McArthur
Shetland T. Scott Wishart
Highlands and Islands 1 W. Ewing Gibson J. Finnie --> --> Burgess
Highlands and Islands 2 Hamilton Mather Hamilton MacKenzie Todd Roddick
Highlands and Islands 3 Macmillan D. Stewart D.Ross
Highlands and Islands 4 Grant E. Scott Grant
Highlands and Islands 5 Peacock Urquhart --> D. Ross Johnston
Highlands and Islands 6 McGrigor Mountain
Highlands and Islands 7 Scanlon Petrie Scanlon Cameron

Lothians (1999–2011) / Lothian (2011–2026) / Edinburgh and Lothians East (2026–)

[edit]

  Conservative   Green   Independent   Labour   Liberal Democrats   Scottish National Party   Scottish Socialist

1999 2003 May 2007 Aug 07 2011 13 14 2016 19 2021 2026
East Lothian Coast and Lammermuirs (2026–) in South Scotland region TBD
Edinburgh East and Musselburgh (1999–2011) / Edinburgh Eastern (2011–2026) / Edinburgh Eastern, Musselburgh and Tranent (2026–) Deacon MacAskill Denham TBD
Edinburgh Central Boyack Biagi R. Davidson Robertson TBD
Edinburgh Northern (2026–) TBD
Edinburgh North and Leith (1999–2011) / Edinburgh Northern and Leith (2011–2026) / Edinburgh North Eastern and Leith (2026–) Chisholm Macpherson TBD
Edinburgh Pentlands (1999–2026) / Edinburgh South Western (2026–) Gray McLetchie G. MacDonald TBD
Edinburgh South (1999–2011) / Edinburgh Southern (2011–) A. MacKay Pringle Eadie Johnson TBD
Edinburgh West (1999–2011) / Edinburgh Western (2011–2026) / Edinburgh North Western (2026–) M. Smith Keir Cole-Hamilton TBD
Midlothian (1999–2011) / Midlothian North and Musselburgh (2011–2026) / Midlothian North (2026–) Brankin Beattie TBD
Livingston (1999–2011) / Almond Valley (2011–2026) Muldoon Constance in Central Scotland and Lothians West region
Linlithgow (1999–2026) Mulligan Hyslop
Lothian 1 / Lothians 1 (1999–2011) Harper Johnstone
Lothian 2 / Lothians 2 (1999–2011) M. MacDonald --> vacant Wightman Slater
Lothian 3 / Lothians 3 (1999–2011) Hyslop Dugdale Boyack
Lothian 4 / Lothians 4 (1999–2011) MacAskill McKee Findlay Choudhury
Lothian 5 / Lothians 5 (1999–2011) Steel Fox Tymkewycz Somerville Boyack Lindhurst Webber
Lothian 6 / Lothians 6 (1999–2011) Douglas-Hamilton G. Brown Briggs
Lothian 7 / Lothians 7 (1999–2011) McLetchie Ballard Foulkes McLetchie Buchanan Balfour

Mid Scotland and Fife

[edit]

  Conservative   Green   Independent   Labour   Liberal Democrats   Scottish National Party

1999 2003 05 2007 2011 12 13 14 2016 2021 2026
Dunfermline East (1999–2011) / Cowdenbeath (2011–) Eadie Rowley A. Ewing
Dunfermline West (1999–2011) / Dunfermline (2011–) Barrie Tolson Walker --> Hilton Somerville
Clackmannanshire and Dunblane / Ochil (1999–2011) R. Simpson Reid K. Brown
Mid Fife and Glenrothes / Fife Central (1999–2011) McLeish May Marwick Gilruth
Kirkcaldy Livingstone Torrance
North East Fife I. Smith R. Campbell Rennie
Perthshire North / North Tayside (1999–2011) Swinney
Perthshire South and Kinross-shire / Perth (1999–2011) Cunningham Fairlie
Stirling Jackson Crawford Tweed
Mid Scotland and Fife 1 Crawford C. Harvie A. Ewing Ruskell
Mid Scotland and Fife 2 Marwick Park Baxter Rowley
Mid Scotland and Fife 3 Reid Ruskell Brennan-Baker
Mid Scotland and Fife 4 Raffan Arbuckle R. Simpson Lockhart
Mid Scotland and Fife 5 Harding Brocklebank Rennie A. Stewart
Mid Scotland and Fife 6 Johnston Fraser
Mid Scotland and Fife 7 Monteith L. Smith

North East Scotland

[edit]

  Conservative   Green   Labour   Liberal Democrats   Scottish National Party

1999 01 2003 06 2007 2011 13 Jan 16 May 2016 Dec 16 17 2021 2026
Aberdeen Central L. MacDonald K. Stewart
Aberdeen Donside / Aberdeen North (1999–2011) E. Thomson B. Adam McDonald --> Dunbar
Aberdeen South and North Kincardine / Aberdeen South (1999–2011) Stephen Watt Nicoll
Aberdeenshire East / Gordon (1999–2011) Radcliffe Salmond Martin
Aberdeenshire West / West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine (1999–2011) Rumbles Robertson Burnett
Angus (1999–2011) / Angus South (2011–) Welsh Dey
Angus North and Mearns (2011-) Don Gougeon
Banffshire and Buchan Coast / Banff and Buchan (1999–2011) Salmond Stevenson Adam
Dundee City East / Dundee East (1999–2011) McAllion Robison
Dundee City West / Dundee West (1999–2011) Maclean FitzPatrick
North East Scotland 1 Robison Glen J. Marra M. Marra
North East Scotland 2 B. Adam Baird Don L. MacDonald Vilalba
North East Scotland 3 McGugan Baker Brennan R. Thomson Mason Lumsden
North East Scotland 4 Lochhead Watt McDonald Allard Chapman Golden
North East Scotland 5 Ale. Johnstone Bowman White
North East Scotland 6 B. Wallace Milne L. Kerr
North East Scotland 7 D. Davidson McInnes Rumbles Chapman

South of Scotland (1999–2011) / South Scotland (2011–)

[edit]

  Conservative   Green   Independent   Labour   Liberal Democrats   Reform UK   Scottish National Party   Scottish Socialist   Solidarity

1999 00 2003 05 06 2007 2011 2016 17 20 21 2021 2026
Ayr Welsh J. Scott Brown TBD
Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley Jamieson Ingram Freeman Whitman TBD
Clydesdale Gillon A. Campbell McAllan TBD
Dumfries (1999–2011) / Dumfriesshire (2011–) Murray O. Mundell TBD
East Kilbride (2026–) in Central Scotland region TBD
Roxburgh and Berwickshire (1999–2011) / Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire (2011–) Robson Lamont Hamilton TBD
Galloway and Upper Nithsdale (1999–2011) / Galloway and West Dumfries (2011–) Morgan Fergusson Carson TBD
Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse (2026–) in Central Scotland region TBD
Kilmarnock & Irvine Valley in Central Scotland region Coffey TBD
Tweeddale, Ettrick & Lauderdale (1999–2011) / Midlothian South, Tweeddale & Lauderdale (2011–) Jenkins Purvis Grahame TBD
East Lothian Home Robertson Gray McLennan in Edinburgh and Lothians East region
Cunninghame South Oldfather in West Scotland region
South of Scotland 1 / South Scotland 1 (2011) Grahame McAlpine Mochan TBD
South of Scotland 2 / South Scotland 2 (2011) Ingram Wheelhouse Whitfield TBD
South of Scotland 3 / South Scotland 3 (2011) Russell Morgan McLeod Harper TBD
South of Scotland 4 / South Scotland 4 (2011) Fergusson Byrne --> Russell Brodie Hamilton Ballantyne --> --> Hoy TBD
South of Scotland 5 / South Scotland 5 (2011) Tosh Ballance A. Campbell Beamish Dowey TBD
South of Scotland 6 / South Scotland 6 (2011) D. Mundell Brownlee Pearson Smyth TBD
South of Scotland 7 / South Scotland 7 (2011) Gallie Hume Whittle TBD

West of Scotland (1999–2011) / West Scotland (2011–)

[edit]

  Conservative   Green   Independent   Labour   Liberal Democrats   Scottish National Party   Scottish Socialist

1999 01 2003 2007 2011 2016 20 2021
Strathkelvin and Bearsden Galbraith Fitzpatrick Turner Whitton McLeod R. Mackay
Clydebank and Milngavie McNulty Paterson McNair
Dumbarton Baillie
Eastwood Macintosh Carlaw
Paisley South / Renfrewshire South (2011) Henry Arthur
Paisley North / Paisley (2011) Alexander G. Adam
West Renfrewshire / Renfrewshire North and West (2011) Godman D. Mackay --> Don
Greenock and Inverclyde McNeil McMillan
Cunninghame North A. Wilson K. Gibson
Cunninghame South Burgess Maguire
West of Scotland 1 / West Scotland 1 (2011) C. Campbell Maxwell Greer
West of Scotland 2 / West Scotland 2 (2011) Ullrich Martin McMillan Macintosh Clark
West of Scotland 3 / West Scotland 3 (2011) Quinan McFee W. Wilson Fee O'Kane
West of Scotland 4 / West Scotland 4 (2011) McLeod F. Curran Paterson Bibby
West of Scotland 5 / West Scotland 5 (2011) R. Finnie McDougall Greene
West of Scotland 6 / West Scotland 6 (2011) Goldie Golden Findlay
West of Scotland 7 / West Scotland 7 (2011) Young Tosh Carlaw Corry Gosal

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The constituencies and electoral regions of the Scottish Parliament provide the structure for its mixed-member proportional electoral system, electing 129 Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) through a combination of 73 single-member constituencies decided by first-past-the-post plurality voting and 56 additional regional members allocated proportionally from party lists across eight multi-member regions using the d'Hondt formula. This hybrid approach, designed to balance direct local representation with overall proportionality in seat distribution, was instituted by the Scotland Act 1998 to operationalize devolved legislative powers following Scotland's 1997 referendum approval of a devolved assembly. Each voter casts two ballots—one for a constituency candidate and one for a regional party list—with regional seats compensating for disproportionalities in constituency outcomes to approximate the regional popular vote share. The system's boundaries, encompassing all of Scotland divided into constituencies averaging around 73,000 electors each and larger regions grouping 8–10 constituencies, undergo periodic independent reviews by Boundaries Scotland to account for demographic shifts, with the most recent adjustments set for implementation at the 2026 election. While enabling minority parties greater access to seats than pure plurality systems, the mechanism has drawn scrutiny for incentivizing tactical voting and dual candidacy, where parties field candidates in both constituency and list races to maximize regional compensation.

Establishment via Scotland Act 1998

The received on 19 November 1998, thereby creating the legal foundation for the Scottish Parliament's electoral structure comprising constituencies and electoral regions. Section 1 of the Act established the Parliament as consisting of constituency members elected by simple majority in each constituency and regional members elected from electoral regions using at general elections, with provisions for handling vacancies. Schedule 1 to the Act specified 73 constituencies for the Parliament, each returning one constituency MSP, and defined 8 electoral regions, with each region allocated 7 regional members for a total of 56 regional MSPs. These numbers were fixed to enable a mixed-member proportional system, where regional seats compensate for disproportionality in constituency outcomes, though the Act deferred detailed boundary delimitation to Orders in Council under paragraph 6 of the Schedule. The initial constituencies under the Act were coterminous with the 72 mainland Westminster constituencies existing in , plus a separate constituency for the Orkney Islands, Shetland Islands, and Na h-Eileanan an Iar (Western Isles), ensuring geographic alignment with parliamentary boundaries at establishment. Electoral regions were grouped into , North East , Mid and , Lothians, Central , , West of , and South of , as outlined in the Act's framework for regional member allocation via party lists. This structure facilitated the Parliament's first elections in 1999, with subsequent reviews mandated every 8 to 12 years to maintain electoral equity.

Design Intent and First-Principles Rationale for Mixed System

The (AMS) adopted for the under the was intended to deliver a hybrid form of representation that mitigates the disproportionality inherent in first-past-the-post (FPTP) elections while retaining direct constituency links for local accountability. This design emerged from deliberations in the Scottish Constitutional Convention, established in 1989, where cross-party consensus favored proportionality to reflect Scotland's pluralistic political landscape and prevent single-party dominance akin to Westminster outcomes. The Convention's 1995 report specified 73 constituency seats via FPTP alongside 56 regional additional members to compensate for imbalances, ensuring no party exceeds its overall vote share significantly. The system's mechanics link the two votes—constituency and regional list—such that regional allocations adjust for constituency results using the , prioritizing parties' regional vote totals minus attained constituency seats. This compensatory approach, drawn from models in and , targets an effective threshold around 7-8% for regional viability, promoting broader party viability without fragmenting local representation. Empirical implementation since 1999 has yielded Gallagher indices of disproportionality typically under 5, far lower than FPTP's 10-20 in comparable systems, validating the intent to align seats more closely with votes. Causally, pure FPTP distorts representation because victories hinge on pluralities in isolated districts, systematically advantaging larger parties through vote concentration and wasting opposition ballots— as seen in the 1997 UK election where Labour secured 418 of 659 seats (63.4%) on 43.2% of votes. The mixed system's rationale rests on correcting this via targeted regional top-ups, which empirically reduce ' discrepancies and enhance legislative pluralism without eroding the geographic specificity needed for constituency casework and pork-barrel responsiveness. This balance addresses FPTP's tendency toward manufactured majorities, which undermine mandate claims, while avoiding pure list PR's dilution of voter-MSP ties, thereby optimizing democratic legitimacy through dual accountability channels.

Evolution Through Subsequent Legislation

The Scottish Parliament (Constituencies) Act 2004, enacted by the UK Parliament on 13 May 2004, marked the primary legislative evolution by amending Schedule 1 of the Scotland Act 1998. This change severed the previous alignment between Scottish Parliament constituencies and those for the UK House of Commons, which had required identical boundaries since the 1999 election. The amendment empowered the Boundary Commission for Scotland (later renamed Boundaries Scotland) to conduct independent periodic reviews of constituency and regional boundaries, aiming to address disparities arising from Westminster boundary changes and demographic shifts while preserving the total of 73 constituencies and 8 electoral regions. The first such review, initiated under the amended framework, culminated in the Boundary Commission's report submitted on 26 May 2010. Its recommendations, which adjusted boundaries to equalize electorates (targeting no more than 5% variance from the electoral quota) and refined regional groupings without altering their number or core composition, were enacted through the Scottish Parliament (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2010, an laid before Parliament. Effective for the , these changes affected most constituencies, introducing new names and divisions—such as merging parts of former seats in urban areas like —while maintaining the overall mixed-member proportional system. Subsequent refinement came via the , which further amended Schedule 1 of the 1998 Act to devolve additional authority over electoral arrangements and mandate a second periodic review by 1 May 2025. This legislation renamed the reviewing body Boundaries Scotland and emphasized factors like geographical coherence and local ties in boundary deliberations, without modifying the fixed numbers of constituencies or regions. The second review's report, dated April 2025, proposed updates reflecting post-2011 population movements, including tweaks to 45 of the 73 constituencies and minor regional boundary shifts in seven of the eight areas. These were implemented by the Scottish Parliament (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2025, approved on 15 October 2025 and effective for the 7 May 2026 election, ensuring continued adherence to the electoral quota while preserving the 129-member total. No further primary legislation has altered the fundamental structure of constituencies or regions since , with adjustments confined to these periodic Orders in Council under the delegated powers of the amended Schedule 1. This stability reflects a legislative intent to prioritize representational equity through boundary realignments rather than systemic overhauls, though secondary acts like the Scottish Elections (Reform) Act 2020 have addressed ancillary electoral provisions without impacting delimitation.

Electoral Mechanics

Constituency-Based Representation

The Scottish Parliament elects 73 Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) through constituency-based representation, with each of 73 single-member constituencies returning one MSP via the first-past-the-post (FPTP) system. In FPTP, voters cast a single vote for a preferred candidate on the constituency ballot paper by marking an "X" in the box beside the candidate's name, and the candidate securing the highest number of votes—regardless of majority—is declared the winner. This method, specified in the Scotland Act 1998, ensures direct linkage between an MSP and a defined local electorate, fostering accountability for constituency-specific issues such as infrastructure, education, and health services. Constituency boundaries are delimited to achieve electoral equality, with each constituency's electorate approximating the national electoral quota—calculated by dividing 's total registered electorate by 73—while considering geographical features, local ties, and administrative units. Departures from exact quota adherence are permitted only to avoid excessive disparities or undue fragmentation of communities, as guided by statutory rules under the . Unlike UK constituencies, constituencies are independently configured, though they often align partially with local government wards or Westminster seats for practicality. Elections occur concurrently with regional voting every five years, but constituency results stand alone without immediate proportional correction. Vacancies in constituency seats arise from resignation, death, or disqualification and are filled via by-elections using the same FPTP method, ensuring continuity of local representation without resorting to party lists. This contrasts with regional seats, where vacancies trigger list-based replacements. Historical data from elections since 1999 show FPTP yielding disproportionate seat shares relative to vote totals, often favoring larger parties; for instance, in the 2021 election, the won 44 of 73 seats with 47.7% of constituency votes, while smaller parties struggled for representation. Critics argue this amplifies tactical voting and safe seats, yet proponents highlight its simplicity and strong constituent-MSP ties.

Regional List Compensation Mechanism

The regional list compensation mechanism forms the core of the Scottish Parliament's Additional Member System, allocating 56 regional seats across eight electoral regions to offset disproportionalities arising from the 73 first-past-the-post constituency elections. Each region receives seven regional members, with seats distributed to political parties and independent candidates based on the second ballot vote—the regional list vote—adjusted to account for constituency outcomes. This process, governed by sections 7 and 8 of the Scotland Act 1998, employs the d'Hondt method to prioritize proportionality at the regional level while incorporating constituency results into the calculation. The allocation begins after all 73 constituency results are finalized, ensuring regional seats serve a compensatory function. For each region, the regional returning officer totals valid regional votes for registered parties and independent candidates. The initial "regional figure" for a party is calculated as its total regional votes divided by one plus the number of constituency seats that party won in the region; for independent candidates, the figure equals their total regional votes. The party or candidate with the highest regional figure is allocated the first regional seat. Upon allocation, that party's or candidate's figure is recalculated by dividing its votes by the new divisor (one plus total seats now notionally won, including the regional seat just allocated), and the process iterates until seven seats are filled, always awarding to the highest current figure. Ties are resolved by adding one vote to tied figures and recalculating, or by lot if necessary. This divisor adjustment embeds compensation: parties securing many constituency seats face higher initial divisors, requiring a larger vote share to claim regional seats, which prevents over-representation and top-ups parties underrepresented in constituencies relative to their regional vote. Regional seats for parties are filled from pre-submitted closed lists in fixed order, excluding candidates already elected as constituency members; exhausted lists disqualify the party from further allocations. Independent regional candidates, if allocated a seat, are elected directly without lists. The mechanism applies uniformly across regions such as Central Scotland, , , , Mid Scotland and , North East Scotland, South Scotland, and West Scotland. Empirical outcomes demonstrate the system's intent to approximate overall, though the d'Hondt method's bias toward larger parties—due to its highest average allocation—means smaller parties may still struggle for regional seats unless their constituency performance is minimal. For instance, in the 2021 election, the won 44 constituency seats but only two regional seats, reflecting the compensatory adjustment. No substantive changes to the mechanism have occurred since its 1999 inception, despite periodic electoral reforms.

Voter Choice and Tactical Considerations

Voters in Scottish Parliament elections cast two votes: one for a to represent their single-member constituency, determining 73 seats through first-past-the-post, and one for a on the regional list , allocating 56 compensatory seats across eight regions via the to achieve overall proportionality. The constituency vote enables direct selection of a local (MSP) based on plurality, while the regional vote targets party strength for balance, allowing voters to split tickets between candidates and parties without linkage. Tactical voting predominantly occurs on the constituency ballot due to its winner-take-all nature, where voters may support a less-preferred candidate likely to defeat a more opposed rival, rather than their ideological first choice, to influence outcomes on key issues like independence. In the 2021 election, unionist voters—spanning Conservative and Labour supporters—frequently coordinated to back the stronger anti-SNP candidate in marginal seats, setting aside left-right differences; for instance, Labour voters in Conservative-leaning areas switched to Conservatives, contributing to SNP losses in several Central Belt constituencies. This behavior, evidenced in post-election surveys, amplified unionist representation by an estimated 4-6 seats beyond proportional expectations, as tactical coordination reduced vote splitting among pro-UK parties. On the regional list, tactical considerations are subtler and less prevalent, as the compensatory mechanism rewards parties underrepresented in constituencies, encouraging sincere voting for smaller parties to secure list seats without risking constituency gains. However, voters may strategically withhold list support from dominant constituency winners like the SNP to deny them additional seats, instead bolstering allies or independents; in 2021, this dynamic aided the , with about 50% of their list votes attributed to pro-independence tactical transfers from SNP supporters aiming to maximize the independence bloc. Such maneuvers exploit the D'Hondt formula's sensitivity to vote efficiency, where over-concentration on list votes for constituency-strong parties yields diminishing returns. Empirical analyses indicate tactical voting's overall impact remains limited by the system's hybrid design, which mitigates FPTP distortions through list compensation, though it persists where constitutional cleavages— versus union—override policy preferences, as seen in 2021 turnout patterns favoring tactical unity in competitive races.

Boundary Reviews and Delimitation

Initial Boundaries for 1999 Election (1999–2011)

The initial boundaries for Scottish Parliament constituencies were defined in Schedule 1 to the Scotland Act 1998, which specified 73 single-member constituencies by reference to local government wards and electoral divisions as they existed on 7 May 1998. These constituencies were grouped into 8 electoral regions, each returning 7 additional members via regional list proportional representation, for a total of 129 seats. The delimitation aimed to produce constituencies of approximately equal electorate size, with an electoral quota derived from the total Scottish electorate divided by 73, while respecting local ties, geographical features, and existing administrative boundaries; the average constituency electorate was around 51,000 in 1999. The 8 electoral regions and their constituent constituencies were fixed as follows, with variations in the number of constituencies per region reflecting population distribution:
Electoral RegionNumber of Constituencies
Central Scotland9
10
8
Lothians11
Mid Scotland and Fife10
North East Scotland10
South of Scotland9
West of Scotland6
These boundaries applied to the inaugural election on 6 May 1999 and all subsequent elections through 2007, without alteration until the first periodic review. The configuration ensured coverage of Scotland's diverse geography, from densely populated urban areas like (encompassing 10 constituencies across the city's wards) to sparsely populated rural regions like (spanning 8 constituencies including , , and mainland Highland council areas). No interim adjustments occurred, as the mandated periodic reviews by the Boundary Commission for Scotland starting after 1999, with the first report submitted in 2010 leading to changes effective for the 2011 election.

First Periodic Review and 2011 Redistricting

The Boundary Commission for Scotland conducted the First Periodic Review of constituencies and electoral regions for the pursuant to Schedule 1 of the , as amended by the Scottish Parliament (Constituencies) Act 2004, to reflect shifts in electorate size and local authority boundaries since the initial 1999 setup. The review prioritized equalizing constituency electorates around a quota of 54,728 while preserving local ties, community interests, geographic contiguity, and council area integrity where feasible. Provisional proposals underwent , followed by revised recommendations incorporating feedback, with final adjustments effective from 1 April 2010 in select areas. The Commission's report, submitted to the Secretary of State for on 26 May 2010, proposed retaining 73 constituencies—71 mainland plus the standalone Islands and Islands—grouped into the existing 8 regions, though with West Central Scotland renamed to West Scotland for clarity. Boundary tweaks were generally incremental, addressing population growth in urban areas and declines elsewhere, but included targeted restructurings such as reducing City from three to two constituencies, splitting , and permitting limited cross-council boundary crossings (e.g., between Aberdeen City and , or Glasgow City and ) to meet the equality rule. Implementation occurred through The Scottish Parliament (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2010, an made in November 2010 that amended Schedule 1 of the by specifying the new constituencies and regions, with detailed maps deposited alongside. The order entered force the day after its making, enabling use in the 5 May 2011 , which marked the transition from the 1999–2011 configuration to this updated framework without altering the total seat count or regional structure.

Second Review and 2026 Boundary Reforms

The Second Review of Scottish Parliament constituencies and electoral regions was initiated by Boundaries Scotland on 1 September 2022, pursuant to requirements under the for periodic boundary adjustments to reflect changes in electorate distribution. The review's primary objective was to establish constituencies with electorates as nearly equal as practicable, calculated by dividing the total Scottish electorate by 73, while adhering to rules that prioritize existing local authority boundaries, geographical considerations, and local ties to minimize disruption to voter representation. Special provisions preserved the three island constituencies—Na h-Eileanan an Iar, Orkney Islands, and Shetland Islands—without alteration, leaving 70 mainland constituencies subject to potential redrawing. The process encompassed provisional proposals in 2023, followed by revised, further, additional, and supplementary proposals through 2025, with extensive public consultations and local inquiries held in locations including , Paisley, and Whitburn to incorporate stakeholder feedback on proposed changes. Boundaries Scotland finalized its recommendations on 1 May 2025, submitting a report to Scottish Ministers that detailed adjusted boundaries responsive to in urban centers like and , and relative decline in rural areas. Of the 73 constituencies, 28 retained both existing names and boundaries, while 20 underwent both renaming and redrawing; notable new constituencies included , , , and , reflecting mergers or splits to achieve electoral parity within a 5% variance tolerance where feasible. Electoral regions also saw modifications to align with constituency shifts, maintaining eight regions overall but with boundary adjustments in , South Scotland, and West Scotland to ensure comprehensive coverage without overlap. Central was renamed Central and s West with boundary changes, while became Edinburgh and s East without boundary alteration; no changes affected , North East , or Mid and Fife, preserving stability in sparsely populated or geographically distinct areas. These reforms address demographic shifts since the 2011 review, such as urban expansion, without altering the total seat allocation of 129 members of the . Implementation occurred via The Scottish Parliament (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2025, which enacts Boundaries Scotland's recommendations by defining the precise boundaries, constituency types (burgh or county), and regions, effective upon dissolution of the current Parliament ahead of the 7 May 2026 election. The Order revokes the prior 2020 arrangements and provides for GIS data availability, ensuring seamless transition while upholding the system's integrity. Scottish Ministers approved the recommendations without substantive deviation, emphasizing the review's role in sustaining democratic fairness amid evolving population patterns.

Configurations Over Time

Pre-2011 Setup

The Scottish Parliament's electoral framework prior to 2011, as established by the , comprised 73 single-member constituencies elected via the first-past-the-post system, aggregated into 8 electoral regions that each allocated 7 additional members from closed party lists to mitigate disproportional outcomes from constituency voting. This mixed-member proportional structure aimed to balance local representation with overall proportionality, yielding a total of 129 members of the (MSPs). The regions were defined as Central Scotland, , Highlands and Islands, Lothians, Mid Scotland and Fife, North East Scotland, South of Scotland, and West of Scotland, with constituency groupings fixed to align regional list compensation to specific geographic clusters. Constituency boundaries were initially delineated to mirror the 72 mainland Westminster parliamentary constituencies extant before the Act's enactment on 1 July 1998, supplemented by three standalone island seats for Islands, Islands, and Na h-Eileanan an Iar (Western Isles). Adjustments included subdividing populous urban districts—such as dividing into 4 seats (e.g., Edinburgh Central, East, North and Leith, Pentlands, ) and into 10 (e.g., Anniesland, , , , , , , , , )—to achieve electorates approximating 50,000 per constituency while respecting local ties and geography. These delimitations, formalized via Orders in Council under the Act, prioritized electoral equality subject to rules favoring boundaries and limited elector variance (not exceeding 10% deviation from the electoral quota). This configuration remained unaltered through the Parliament's first three elections—held on 6 May 1999, 3 May 2003, and 3 May 2007—despite population shifts and the Scottish Parliament (Constituencies) Act 2004 enabling potential alignment with Westminster seats, as no periodic review had yet revised boundaries. The fixed setup preserved continuity but drew early critiques for outdated electorates in growing areas like and stagnant rural zones, prompting the Boundary Commission for Scotland's inaugural review commencing in 2005, with recommendations implemented only for the 2011 election.

2011–2026 Arrangement

The 2011–2026 arrangement for constituencies and electoral regions resulted from the Boundary Commission for Scotland's First Periodic Review, initiated in July 2007 and finalized with recommendations submitted on 26 May 2010. These were enacted through the (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2010, effective for elections from 5 May 2011 onward. The structure preserved 73 single-member constituencies elected by first-past-the-post, aggregated into 8 fixed electoral regions, each allocating 7 additional members via from party lists to compensate for constituency disproportionality. Delimitation prioritized electoral parity using a quota of 54,728 derived from the July 2007 register (total electorate 3,919,310), permitting variances up to one-fifth while minimizing splits in wards and preserving community identities.
Electoral RegionConstituencies
Central Scotland9
Glasgow9
9
9
Mid Scotland and Fife9
North East Scotland9
South Scotland9
West Scotland10
This yielded 73 constituencies total, with regions encompassing contiguous areas reflecting geographic and demographic patterns. Relative to the 1999–2011 setup, Central Scotland and each ceded one constituency, while , , and South Scotland each added one, adjusting for population shifts without altering the national total. The configuration supported elections in 2011, 2016, and 2021, with electorates averaging around 54,000 per constituency by implementation. Regional boundaries followed constituency groupings, ensuring no overlap and full territorial coverage of .

Post-2026 Projections

The post-2026 configuration of constituencies and electoral regions, approved via the (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2025 and effective for the election on 7 May 2026, retains the established total of 73 single-member constituencies and 8 multi-member regions, yielding 129 MSPs overall. This structure upholds the , with regional list seats (56 in total) allocated to achieve proportionality after constituency results. Boundaries Scotland's final recommendations, submitted in May 2025 and endorsed by Scottish Ministers in October 2025, adjusted maps to equalize electorate sizes—targeting a quota of approximately 57,000 electors per constituency based on 2022 data—while prioritizing boundaries, , and ties under statutory rules. Of the 73 constituencies, 45 underwent boundary alterations, with 28 retaining unchanged names and borders, including the three legislatively protected island seats: Na h-Eileanan an Iar, Orkney Islands, and Shetland Islands. Notable revisions include the creation of new constituencies such as East Lothian Coast and Lammermuirs (merging coastal areas from East Lothian with rural Lammermuir wards), Edinburgh Eastern (incorporating expanded urban wards), and Musselburgh and Tranent (combining East Lothian towns to balance electorate deviations exceeding 10%). In central Scotland, adjustments addressed over- and under-quota issues, such as refining Almond Valley and Bathgate in West Lothian to incorporate Polbeth while minimizing cross-council spans, and realigning Falkirk East with Linlithgow. These changes reduce average electorate variance to within 5-10% for most seats, compared to pre-review disparities up to 15%, enhancing electoral parity amid population shifts toward urban centers like Edinburgh and the central belt. Electoral regions saw modifications in seven of eight, with Mid Scotland and Fife preserved intact to maintain its coherence across , , and . Revised regions include reallocations like shifting and Hamilton from West Scotland to South Scotland for better urban-rural alignment, and boundary tweaks in Central Scotland and Lothians West, Edinburgh and Lothians East, , North East Scotland, and South Scotland to reflect updated constituency groupings. The region accommodates a -32.4% electorate shortfall due to statutory geographical exemptions, ensuring remote areas' representation without forced mergers. Overall, the reforms minimize multi-council constituencies (59 now wholly within one authority, down slightly from 61) and promote compactness, though one constituency () exceeds 15% variance (-17.3%) owing to terrain constraints. This setup projects sustained emphasis on proportionality, with regional compensation mitigating constituency majorities, but introduces tactical shifts for parties: urban expansions may favor denser voter bases in Labour-SNP contests, while rural consolidations could amplify Conservative or Liberal Democrat footholds in peripheral areas. No alterations to seat totals or voting mechanics are anticipated, preserving the system's hybrid balance as legislated in the Scotland Act 1998.

Party Performance and Representation Patterns

Historical Constituency Wins by Party

In the inaugural , the Labour Party secured 53 of the 73 constituency seats, reflecting its dominance in urban and central , while the won 17, primarily in the north and Borders, the (SNP) took 7 in rural and highland areas, and the won none. By the 2003 election, Labour maintained a strong position with 50 constituency victories, including sweeps in and the , but the SNP gained ground with 9 seats, the Liberal Democrats held 13, and the Conservatives secured just 1 in the south-west. The 2007 election marked a shift, as Labour's constituency tally fell to 37 amid voter dissatisfaction, the SNP surged to 21 wins fueled by independence appeals in peripheral regions, the Liberal Democrats retained 11, and the Conservatives improved to 4, breaking their prior shutout in rural Borders seats. Labour's decline accelerated in 2011, winning only 15 constituencies as the SNP achieved a historic 53 victories across diverse areas including former Labour strongholds in the west, with Conservatives holding 3 and Liberal Democrats dropping to 2. The SNP's constituency dominance peaked in 2016 with 59 seats, capturing nearly all and northern constituencies on 46.5% of the vote, while Conservatives gained 7 in the south and east, Liberal Democrats 4 in strongholds like and , and Labour slumped to 3. In 2021, the SNP won 62 constituencies, extending control over most of except select conservative rural pockets and urban liberal enclaves, with Liberal Democrats securing 4, Conservatives 4, Labour 2, and the achieving its first-ever constituency win in Edinburgh Central.
Election YearLabourSNPConservativeLiberal DemocratsOther
19995370170
20035091130
200737214110
20111553320
2016359740
2021262441 (Green)
These patterns illustrate the first-past-the-post system's amplification of SNP gains post-2007, driven by concentrated nationalist support, while fragmenting opposition votes disadvantaged Labour and others in winnable seats.

Regional Seat Allocations and Compensation Effects

The 56 regional seats in the are distributed across eight electoral regions, with each region allocated exactly seven seats to ensure a total of 56 additional members beyond the 73 constituency MSPs. This fixed allocation per region, established under the , applies uniformly regardless of variations in the number of constituencies per region—for example, the region encompasses only three constituencies, while Central Scotland covers ten. Regional seats are allocated using the d'Hondt formula, applied separately to each region's list vote totals after constituency results are finalized. Under this method, a party's regional vote total is divided by successive integers (1, 2, 3, and so on) to generate quotients, with the highest quotients across all parties awarding seats iteratively until the region's seven seats are filled. To incorporate compensation, the initial quotient for each party is calculated by dividing its regional votes by one more than the number of constituency seats it has already won in that region; subsequent quotients follow the standard progression. This adjustment reduces the likelihood of parties dominating both tiers, as those overrepresented in constituency results (via ) face higher effective thresholds for regional seats. The compensation mechanism promotes overall proportionality to the regional list vote, mitigating the winner-takes-all effects of constituency elections, where a party might secure a of seats with under 50% of votes. For instance, parties like the , which won 44 constituencies in 2021 despite 47.7% of the regional vote, received only four regional seats across , limiting their total to 64 MSPs (49.6% of 129). Conversely, parties with minimal constituency success, such as the (zero constituencies but 4.6% regional vote), gained eight regional seats, achieving full proportionality within the system's constraints. This dynamic has consistently produced parliament compositions closer to list vote shares than pure constituency outcomes would, with effective thresholds around 5-7% per region for list seats depending on incumbency effects. However, the regional focus can amplify local variations, occasionally resulting in overhangs or under-allocations if a party exceeds projected totals, though the fixed regional seat count prevents true overhangs seen in other mixed systems.

Implications for Government Stability

The Additional Member System (AMS) employed by the Scottish Parliament, combining 73 first-past-the-post constituency seats with 56 regionally allocated list seats, inherently favors proportional outcomes over decisive majorities, thereby influencing government formation towards minority administrations or coalitions rather than single-party dominance. This design, intended to mitigate the winner-takes-all risks of pure majoritarian systems, has resulted in no party securing an outright majority in five of the seven elections held from 1999 to 2021, compelling governments to negotiate ongoing support from opposition parties. For instance, the system's regional compensation mechanism allocates list seats to parties underrepresented in constituencies, ensuring smaller parties like the Scottish Greens or Liberal Democrats retain parliamentary influence, which dilutes the largest party's seat share even when it dominates constituency votes. Historically, this has manifested in varied government stability. From 1999 to 2007, Labour formed coalitions with the Liberal Democrats, providing continuity through formal agreements but requiring compromises on policy, such as free personal care for the elderly, which extended beyond initial platforms. The 2007 election produced an SNP minority government under Alex Salmond, which endured four years despite lacking a majority, sustained by case-by-case deals, including tacit Conservative abstentions on key votes, avoiding no-confidence defeats. Stability here derived from opposition fragmentation rather than inherent system strengths, as Labour, Conservatives, and Liberal Democrats failed to coalesce against the SNP. In contrast, the 2011 SNP majority under revised boundaries marked a rare exception, enabling unilateral decisions like the 2014 independence referendum legislation, but subsequent elections reverted to minorities: 2016 saw the SNP govern with Green confidence-and-supply support, while 2021 led to an SNP-Green coalition agreement that collapsed in April 2024 amid disputes over climate targets. These patterns underscore causal trade-offs in stability: proportionality fosters inclusive governance by necessitating cross-party buy-in, potentially reducing policy volatility through veto points, yet it heightens vulnerability to breakdowns when partners diverge, as evidenced by the 2024 coalition rupture forcing the SNP into unsupported minority rule. Empirical data from 1999–2021 shows minority or coalition governments averaging legislative productivity comparable to the 2011 majority—passing annual budgets and major bills without systemic gridlock—but with elevated negotiation costs, such as delayed reforms during 2007–2011. Critics argue the system's bias towards fragmentation, amplified by regional lists amplifying minor parties' leverage, undermines decisive action on issues like fiscal policy, where single-party control might expedite outcomes, though proponents counter that it averts the instability of unstable majorities seen in pure FPTP systems elsewhere. Overall, AMS has sustained devolved governance without collapse, but its structure correlates with governments reliant on fluid alliances, rendering stability contingent on electoral fragmentation and inter-party incentives rather than electoral mandates alone.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Reform Debates

Disparities Between Constituency and List MSPs

Constituency MSPs, elected directly via first-past-the-post in single-member districts, are perceived as possessing a stronger personal mandate and primary responsibility for local issues, such as constituent casework and community representation. In contrast, list MSPs, allocated from closed party lists to achieve regional proportionality, are often viewed as secondary, with roles emphasizing broader policy scrutiny and party balance rather than direct geographic . This structural difference has fostered tensions, including instances where list MSPs engage in "shadowing" constituency colleagues by handling overlapping local services, leading to competition for resources and voter attention. Empirical studies highlight disparities in representational behavior: constituency MSPs demonstrate higher responsiveness to public inquiries, with response rates exceeding those of list MSPs across surveyed interactions, underscoring a "mandate divide" where direct election incentivizes localized engagement. List MSPs, lacking a specific constituency, tend to prioritize regional or legislative oversight, but this can result in perceptions of detachment; for example, early post-devolution analyses noted list members' struggles to define distinct roles without encroaching on constituency turf. Controversies have arisen over office allowances and conduct codes, where list MSPs argued for parity, revealing underlying status hierarchies formalized in parliamentary practices. Dual candidacy—allowing individuals to contest both a constituency seat and a party list—exacerbates these disparities, enabling defeated constituency candidates to secure list seats if ranked highly, which critics label as undermining voter intent in direct contests. While intended to maximize party representation, this practice has drawn reform calls, though Scotland has not banned it unlike Wales, where prohibitions aim to clarify mandates. Public and academic discourse often frames list MSPs as "second-class," with proposals for term limits on list tenure to encourage direct electoral competition, though such ideas remain debated without implementation as of 2025. These frictions illustrate how the mixed-member proportional system, while promoting overall balance, generates intra-parliamentary inequities in legitimacy and workload.

Proportionality vs. Direct Accountability Trade-offs

The (AMS) in the combines 73 first-past-the-post (FPTP) constituency seats, which provide direct voter through the election of a single (MSP) tied to a specific geographic area, with 56 regional list seats allocated proportionally to compensate for constituency disproportionality. This structure ensures that voters maintain a personal link to their constituency MSP, who can be held responsible for local issues via direct re-election or defeat, as seen in cases where incumbents lost seats due to constituent dissatisfaction in elections from 1999 onward. Proportionality, achieved through d'Hondt allocation of list seats based on regional party votes, prevents the extreme overrepresentation of large parties under pure FPTP—for example, without list compensation, the Labour Party would have secured over 75% of seats with 38% of the proportional vote in the 1999 inaugural election. List MSPs, however, derive their mandate from party lists rather than individual voter choice, raising concerns about diluted accountability since they are selected by party hierarchies post-election and represent broader regions without fixed local boundaries. This party-centric element can foster perceptions of weaker democratic linkage, as voters lack a direct mechanism to remove underperforming list MSPs independently of party decisions, potentially prioritizing loyalty to leadership over constituent needs. Overlaps in representation—where up to eight MSPs (one constituency and up to seven list) serve the same area—further complicate accountability by diffusing responsibility, with constituents sometimes unclear on which MSP to approach for specific grievances. Critics argue the trade-off favors proportionality at the expense of robust , enabling strategic party behaviors like withholding list candidates in safe constituencies to inflate regional compensation gains, as evidenced in SNP tactics during the 2021 election where they won 62 of 73 constituencies yet received no list seats. Such gaming undermines voter intent and trust, with the noting in 2011 that the system has entrenched effective two-party dominance despite its proportional design, failing to broaden representation or enhance as intended by devolution architects. Defenders counter that pure FPTP would exacerbate disproportionality—yielding Labour 58 seats (45% of total) from 33.6% regional votes in 2003—while eliminating local MSPs altogether under full PR would sever geographic ties essential for addressing devolved matters like and . Empirical outcomes show mixed results: proportionality indices improved post-AMS implementation, but accountability metrics, such as voter recognition of list MSPs, remain lower than for constituency ones, per post-election surveys.

Proposals for Systemic Overhaul

A public petition submitted to the in 2021 (PE1901) proposed replacing the (AMS) with the (STV) for electing all 129 MSPs, eliminating the 73 (soon 72) single-member constituencies and 56 (soon 57) regional list seats in favor of multi-member districts covering . Under this model, voters would rank candidates within larger constituencies of 4–7 members each, with seats allocated proportionally based on vote transfers, similar to Scotland's local council elections since 2007. Proponents argued this would resolve disparities between constituency and list MSPs by treating all representatives equally, reduce incentives for or party gaming of regional lists, and enhance overall proportionality without sacrificing local accountability, as STV allows of individuals rather than closed party lists. The petition highlighted empirical issues in , such as the 2021 election where the secured a one-seat (64 of 129) with 47.7% of constituency votes and 40.3% of regional votes, demonstrating how the system's compensation mechanism can still permit majorities under concentrated support, contrary to its design intent for coalition-prone outcomes. STV advocates, including the , contend it would yield more consistent proportionality—evidenced by Scottish local elections where no party has exceeded 40% vote share yet dominated councils—and mitigate "two-tier" MSP resentments by fostering intra-party competition via open rankings. However, critics of the switch, including parliamentary briefings, note potential drawbacks like larger districts diluting geographic representation (e.g., constituencies spanning urban-rural divides) and increased complexity in ballot design and counting, which could lower turnout without proven gains over AMS's hybrid balance. Alternative overhaul ideas include adopting a pure system with national or enlarged regional open lists, allowing voters to select individual candidates over parties, as suggested by some policy analysts to eliminate FPTP distortions entirely while preserving regional ties. These draw from international mixed-member proportional variants like Germany's, but adapted to open lists to avoid closed-party control. No major political party has formally endorsed such changes; the and have defended for combining direct constituency links with proportionality, while the confirmed in 2024 it holds no plans to pursue full PR reforms for Holyrood elections. Incremental adjustments, such as the statutory shift to 72 constituencies and 57 list seats effective for the 2026 election—driven by population growth under the —represent boundary tweaks rather than structural redesign, maintaining the 129-seat total and framework. Reform debates often reference causal factors like demographic shifts and voter fragmentation, with proponents arguing STV could stabilize representation amid rising multi-party (e.g., six parties winning seats in ), but empirical from AMS's 25-year operation shows it has delivered governments reflective of plural vote shares in five of six elections, undermining claims of . Petitions and think-tank papers remain the primary vehicles for these ideas, lacking legislative traction amid priorities like the Scottish Elections (Representation and ) Bill, which focused on procedural updates such as banning dual mandates rather than voting mechanics.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.