Hubbry Logo
SexecologySexecologyMain
Open search
Sexecology
Community hub
Sexecology
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Sexecology
Sexecology
Sexecology
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Sexecology, also known as ecosexuality, is a radical form of environmental activism based around nature fetishism, the idea of the earth as a lover. It invites people to treat the earth with love rather than see it as an infinite resource to exploit.[1] It was founded by Elizabeth Stephens and Annie Sprinkle, who describe themselves as "two ecosexual artists-in-love", whose manifesto is to make environment activism "more sexy, fun, and diverse".[2] Sexecology employs absurdist humor, performance art and sex-positivity, which Stephens claims "may produce new forms of knowledge that hold potential to alter the future by privileging our desire for the Earth to function with as many diverse, intact and flourishing ecological systems as possible."[3][4][5] The couple promote education, events such as the ecosex symposium, and activism, such as protecting the Appalachian Mountains from mountain top removal.[5]

Difference from ecofeminism

[edit]

Sexecology conceives of the earth not as a mother but as a lover.[6] This conceptual shift invites people to engage their bodies and senses in acts of environmental preservation.[3][further explanation needed]

Unlike ecofeminism, sexecology does not see an intrinsic link between women and nature; some of the limitations of ecofeminism which sex ecology indirectly addresses are "the reliance on women's biological functions to establish a connection between women and nature, the uncritical over-privileging of women's experiences, the inappropriateness of designating ideal female characteristics, and the regressive political implications of associating women with nature".[7] "The formulation of an Eco-Sexual identity is a practice of an erotic eco-logic, deconstructing heteronormative constructions of gender, sex, sexuality, and nature in order to continually queer and destabilize identities, actively form and retain spaces of lack that necessitate interdependency, and engage a permeable sensuous self in perpetual sensorial reciprocity with the sensing and sensible more-than-human environment. It is an identity identified by desire rather than a stable essence or being, and it is a desire for the more-than-human environment in which the human subject is sensorially implicit."[5]

Ecosexuals

[edit]

Proponents of this movement are called "ecosexuals"; they are unafraid to engage in and embrace their erotic experience with the earth, such as bathing naked, having sex with vegetables or having an orgasm in a waterfall.[1] Stephens describes ecosexuals as people who "... are related to cyborgs and are not afraid of engaging in intercourse with nature and/or with technology for that matter. We make love with the Earth through our senses."[3]

Ecosexuals range from those who use sustainable sex products and like being nude in nature to those who "roll around in the dirt having an orgasm covered in potting soil" and those who "masturbate under a waterfall"[8] "[Sprinkle and Stephens] have officiated wedding ceremonies where they and fellow ecosexuals marry the earth, the moon, and other natural entities."[8] They have also stated that they believe there are over 100,000 people who identify as ecosexual worldwide.[8]

Human/nonhuman relationships

[edit]

Sexecology seeks to direct attention towards “the ways in which sex and sexuality affect the larger nonhuman world.” Ecosexuality is an orientation directed toward the non-human material world. With this direction, ecosexuality makes a bold statement that “these human bodies are part of the nonhuman material world.” The blur between human and non-human entities is essential to Sprinkle and Stephens’ demonstration of sexecology.[9]

Sexecology was influenced by contemporary theories around posthumanism and the relationships between humans and nonhumans.[10]

Elizabeth Stephens has said "Haraway’s work has guided my understanding of the material consequences and the theoretical underpinnings embedded in human/nonhuman relationships that matrix our world. This has helped me understand how human exceptionalism has been constructed and privileged throughout the history of religion and science as well as in other secular practices in western culture. Human exceptionalism, in collaboration with global capitalism, has created the isolated space necessary for the ongoing practices that have produced the dangerously degraded environmental conditions in which we now live. The belief systems and ideologies that allow some people to think that they have the Darwinian survival skill and the rights that accompany those skills to use or destroy other human and non humans is now causing the kind of environmental degradation that affects the whole system sooner or later."[11]

Performances and workshops

[edit]

“The Love Art Lab projects aim to instill hope, create an antidote to fear, and act as a call for action.”[12] It is a private demonstration into the work of the two founders of the movement, Sprinkle and Stephens, as the research how to become "lovers with the earth. The performances can be privately booked by contacting the two and are meant to be demonstrational, informative, and "radical."[12]

Sprinkle and Stephens have performed a number of "weddings to the earth" across the world intended to break the barrier between human sexuality and nature. The performances include "Wedding to the Dirt, Wedding to Lake Kallavesi, Wedding to the Coal, Wedding to the Rocks, Wedding to the Snow, Wedding to the Moon, Wedding to the Appalachian Mountains, Wedding to the Earth, and Wedding to the Sea", to date. The intention, according to Sprinkles, is to "shift the metaphor from ‘Earth as Mother’ to ‘Earth as Lover´"[13]

Sprinkle and Stephens have performed a two-women show 25 Ways to Make Love to the Earth (Theatre Piece) at the Kosmos Theatre in Vienna in 2010 to demonstrate how to "make love with the earth", including talking, singing, dancing, and stroking natural objects. The performances are educational as well as self-promoting of the movement.[14]

The aesthetic strategies of sexecology are influenced by Joseph Beuys' concept of social sculpture, which sees art as having the potential to transform society.[15][16]

"... the production of visible art may effect the production of invisible ideological and class relations. For Joseph Beuys, sculpture and artistic creativity hold the potential to reshape the educational and governmental institutions that produce ideological subjects, as well as social, political, and economic systems. Art, Beuys argues, is the necessary condition for the production of a revolutionary society because it can both unravel the old order and engage everyone in the production of a new social order."[3]

Ecosexuals have engaged in protests against mountaintop removal, as shown in the film Goodbye Gauley Mountain: An Ecosexual Love Story.

Goodbye Gauley Mountain: An Ecosexual Love Story (film)

[edit]

Goodbye Gauley Mountain: An Ecosexual Love Story (2013) is an autoethnographic documentary film by Elizabeth Stephens with Annie Sprinkle about the environmental issue of mountaintop removal in West Virginia, United States.[17] West Virginia native Stephens returns to her childhood home to create a film that incorporates autobiography, a brief history of the coal industry, an inventory of activist strategies, an eco-sexual mini-manifesto, and finally, an example of the performance art Stephens and Sprinkle often employ to express their ecosexuality.[18] Stephens presents a community struggling to reconcile their love of their natural mountainous environment with the fact that its destruction via MTR provides the local economy. The piece explores the negative consequences of mountaintop removal, both cosmetic and environmental, and culminates in an exploration of ecosexuality, followed by wedding ceremony in which Stephens and Sprinkle "marry" the mountain. “Ecosexuality inserts an ‘erotic’ humor that plays against the horrific subject matter. So far the feedback that I’ve received at film previews makes me realize that these are effective strategies for creating space to briefly cut the feeling of despair that MTR evokes.”

See also

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sexecology

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Sexecology is an artistic and activist framework developed by and , merging with to explore erotic dimensions of human-nature interactions as a strategy for environmental engagement. Coined by the duo in the early , it posits that sensual and romantic affiliations with natural entities—such as caressing rocks or deriving pleasure from waterfalls—can cultivate by conceptualizing the as a lover rather than a resource or maternal entity. Stephens, a visual artist and professor at the , and Sprinkle, a certified sexologist with a PhD in and background in and adult film, have propagated sexecology through projects since becoming life partners in 2002. Notable endeavors include ecosexual "weddings" to landforms like the , the Desert, and various oceans, symbolizing commitments to ecological preservation; the "Dirty Sexecology: 25 Ways to Make Love to the ," which incorporates acts like conversing with and soil-based intimacy to highlight ; and the iterative Ecosex Manifesto, first drafted in 2009 and updated through version 3.0, which enumerates vows such as "We promise to love, honor and cherish the " while advocating for pleasure-linked conservation over guilt-driven efforts. The movement, often termed ecosexuality, has manifested in international exhibitions, academic discourse, and calls for collaborators in events blending with , positioning sexecology as a counter to anthropocentric exploitation by eroticizing mutual interdependence. While its proponents claim it diversifies by infusing fun and bodily awareness, the framework remains rooted in performative theory rather than quantifiable ecological outcomes, with influence largely confined to and activist spheres.

Origins and History

Early Development (2008–2012)

Sexecology emerged in 2008 as a performative art practice initiated by and Beth Stephens, who framed it as an erotic response to environmental crises through a series of public "ecosexual weddings" to natural elements. The inaugural event, a wedding to the on May 17, 2008, in , involved vows exchanged among redwood trees before 350 guests, officiated by performance artist Guillermo Gómez-Peña, symbolizing a commitment to sustainable intimacy with the planet amid concerns over ecological harm. This blended their sex-positive and relational dynamics with advocacy against , positioning nature as a sensual partner rather than a passive resource. Subsequent early weddings extended this framework, including unions to the sky on June 14, 2009, in , , and the on August 28, 2009, in , , during the . A pivotal 2010 event was the purple wedding to the on November 6 at , which incorporated soil-erosion-themed performances to protest mountaintop removal , a practice that displaces over 500 million tons of earth annually and accelerates valley fill sedimentation. These rituals emphasized "ecosensual" healing actions, such as caressing scarred landscapes, to eroticize environmental restoration without reliance on conventional protest tactics. The Ecosex Manifesto, drafted in 2011 with contributions from Natalie Loveless and Sha LaBare, formalized these origins by declaring the Earth as a lover, ecosexuality as a viable identity for , and ecosexual practices as tools to cultivate planetary care through pleasure rather than guilt. Unveiled during the Ecosex II in 2011, it listed ecosexual directives like embracing dirt and rejecting anthropocentric dominance. Throughout 2008–2012, Sexecology operated with minimal institutional support, sustained by personal collaborations and small-scale art venues, reflecting its roots in independent performance amid broader ecological advocacy.

Expansion and Institutionalization (2013–Present)

Beth Stephens, a key proponent of Sexecology, joined the art faculty at the , in the years following 2013, facilitating academic integration of ecosexual projects through university-hosted platforms and resources. This affiliation supported ongoing artistic outputs, including theater pieces such as "Dirty Sexecology: 25 Ways to Make Love to the ," which explored sensual relationships with natural elements via performance. In 2021, Stephens and released "Assuming the Ecosexual Position: The Earth as Lover," a publication chronicling their ecosexual collaborations and formalizing Sexecology's interdisciplinary approach between , , and . An excerpt titled "Ecosexuality: The Story of Our Love with the " appeared in the journal Ecopoiesis that year, extending the framework's visibility in academic discourse. The period saw continued production of documentary films advancing Sexecological themes, with "Playing with Fire" premiering in July 2025 at the Green Film Festival as the third installment in an ecosexual-environmental trilogy initiated post-2013. These works, produced under Stephens' UC Santa Cruz auspices, emphasized environmental through erotic narratives but remained confined to specialized festivals and galleries. Efforts to institutionalize Sexecology included manifestos and walking tours, such as a 2025 ecosexual tour in searching for natural symbols like the "boobie bird," yet the field has shown limited expansion beyond the originators' networks, lacking broad adoption in mainstream or curricula. No large-scale international workshops or programs tied explicitly to Sexecology emerged by 2025, with activities primarily U.S.-centric and artist-driven.

Key Figures and Contributors

Annie Sprinkle

, born Ellen Steinberg on September 23, 1953, entered the in the early , working as a prostitute in and later transitioning to roles as a feminist and performer in adult films. By the late and through the 1980s, she appeared in and directed over 200 pornographic films, establishing herself as a prolific figure in underground and mainstream adult entertainment while advocating for sex workers' rights and visibility. Her experiences in sex work from 1973 to 1995 informed a shift toward integrating personal narrative with public education on sexuality, emphasizing , , and destigmatization of erotic labor. In the , Sprinkle pivoted to and academia, developing "post-porn modernist" spectacles that blended explicit demonstrations—such as her signature "Public Cervical" display—with lectures on and feminist critiques of . She earned a PhD in from the Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, leveraging this credential to position herself as a sex educator and activist challenging puritanical norms in and . This trajectory laid the groundwork for her later innovations, where she reframed as a tool for broader social and environmental critique, moving beyond human-centric to explore intersections with non-human elements. Sprinkle's contributions to Sexecology emerged prominently from onward, as she advanced concepts of ecosexuality by promoting the eroticization of nature to disrupt anthropocentric dominance and encourage sustainable planetary relations. She articulated this through writings like the Ecosex Manifesto, which posits the as a lover rather than a maternal figure, aiming to cultivate affective bonds that motivate ecological stewardship via pleasure rather than guilt or obligation. In outputs such as her 2017 book Assuming the Ecosexual Position (co-authored but reflecting her performative lineage), Sprinkle detailed performative strategies for "sexing" natural entities, influencing Sexecology's emphasis on embodied, sensory as a counter to exploitative human-nature binaries. Her advocacy framed these practices as extensions of her sex-positive ethos, liberating erotic potential from speciesist constraints to foster reciprocal .

Beth Stephens

Elizabeth Stephens, professionally known as Beth Stephens, is an interdisciplinary artist, filmmaker, and professor at the (UCSC), where she has taught since 1994 in areas including , , , and . Her academic work emphasizes environmental media, integrating ecological concerns with to examine human-nature relationships beyond anthropocentric frameworks. Holding a Ph.D. in , Stephens directs the E.A.R.T.H. Lab (Environmental Art, Research, Theory, and Happenings) at UCSC, which fosters interdisciplinary projects linking art to ecological advocacy. Stephens' ecological expertise grounds Sexecology's framework by conceptualizing attachments to entities—such as landscapes and processes—as pathways to heightened environmental responsibility, positing the as an intimate partner to cultivate stewardship rather than detached conservation. This approach draws on causal links between affective bonds and behavioral change, evidenced in her advocacy for reframing ecological crises through embodied, relational . In , she directed Goodbye Gauley Mountain: An Ecosexual Love Story, a that documents ecosexual interventions against mountaintop removal in , blending personal narrative with on-site to highlight human impacts on geological formations. Through her teaching and publications, Stephens advances Sexecology in academic contexts, incorporating its principles into UCSC courses on performance and to engage students in queer ecological theory. Notable works include the 2021 book Assuming the Ecosexual Position: The Earth as Lover, co-authored with her long-term collaborator, which articulates Sexecology's theoretical scope via the Ecosex Manifesto and case studies of nature-based relationality. Earlier contributions, such as explorations of ecofeminism's evolution into ecosexuality, appear in peer-reviewed discussions queering by prioritizing desire and embodiment over categorical separations of and realms, published around 2014–2021.

Other Participants and Collaborators

Performance artist and photographer Jeff M. Behuniak participated in the Blue Wedding to the Sea event at the 53rd in 2009, contributing documentation and performative elements to early ecosex rituals. Similarly, Joy Brooke Fairfield has served as a director, coordinator, and ongoing collaborator, supporting film productions and community outreach tied to ecosex initiatives. The Ecosex Manifesto received input from scholars Natalie Loveless and Sha LaBare during its drafting in 2011, helping formalize core declarations that drew signatures from a loose network of performance artists, activists, and eco-feminists, though the full list remains informal and unenumerated in . Linda M. Montano, known for endurance-based works, contributed video content and identified as an "ecosexy artist," aligning with sexecology's emphasis on embodied environmental engagement. Informal extensions, such as self-described "ecosluts" within and feminist art scenes, formed ad hoc networks for workshops and declarations, but verifiable involvement stayed confined to niche performative and academic circles without documented expansion into mainstream environmental or indigenous activism. No sustained participation from indigenous perspectives is evidenced, despite occasional critical engagements from indigenous scholars questioning the framework's anthropocentric eroticism.

Core Concepts and Theoretical Framework

Definition and Scope

Sexecology refers to a performative artistic practice that intersects —the scientific study of human sexual behavior—with , the branch of concerned with interactions among organisms and their environments, by framing erotic engagements with as a strategy for environmental advocacy. Coined by performance artists and , the term denotes explorations of overlaps between sexual pleasure and ecological relatedness, often manifesting in symbolic acts that personify the as a lover to disrupt traditional human-nature hierarchies. The scope of sexecology is confined to cultural and activist interventions, including staged performances and community rituals, rather than constituting a formal scientific discipline with testable hypotheses or peer-reviewed methodologies. Proponents emphasize metaphorical eros—such as "marrying" elements like , , or mountains in public ceremonies—to evoke sensory intimacy with the , aiming to foster conservation through affective shifts rather than direct causal interventions in ecological systems. These practices remain grounded in observable artistic outputs, with no verified evidence of measurable impacts on or policy outcomes beyond heightened awareness in niche audiences. Unlike literal paraphilias involving , sexecology positions its as a rhetorical tool to critique and human , prioritizing symbolic relationality over genital or fetishistic literalism. This framing underscores its role as a queer-inflected art form, distinct from empirical sexology's focus on physiological or psychological data, and ecology's reliance on quantitative field studies.

Integration of Sexology and Ecology

Sexecology posits a theoretical synthesis wherein 's of sexual desires—extending beyond reproductive imperatives to encompass diverse erotic orientations and pleasures—intersects with 's holistic view of interdependent natural systems. Proponents argue that reframing -nature relations through an erotic lens fosters affective bonds capable of motivating ecological , akin to how sexual attachments in relationships engender care and protection. This merger draws on 's recognition of sexuality as a multifaceted of behavior, independent of procreation, to propose that analogous "ecosexual" attractions to environmental entities, such as , bodies, or the , could cultivate reciprocal planetary responsibility. Central to this framework is the concept of ecosexuality as an identity or orientation, where individuals romanticize and sensualize nature to transcend anthropocentric dominance, viewing the not as a or maternal entity but as a consensual lover. Advocates, including performance artists and Beth Stephens, contend that such eroticization disrupts extractive paradigms by emphasizing mutual pleasure and sustainability, potentially aligning personal libidinal energies with broader biospheric health. This approach integrates ecological —highlighting feedback loops and —with sexological insights into desire's plasticity, suggesting that erotic immersion in natural processes could enhance environmental empathy and action. Empirical validation of these causal claims remains absent, with no peer-reviewed studies linking ecosexual practices or identities to verifiable improvements in conservation outcomes, such as reduced or restoration metrics. While motivational narratives posit erotic bonds as catalysts for behavioral change, analogous to in interpersonal dynamics, the integration overlooks rigorous testing against controls or longitudinal data on sustained ecological impacts. Consequently, the framework's efficacy hinges on anecdotal and performative assertions rather than causal , raising questions about whether perceived sensual connections yield substantive planetary benefits or merely symbolic gestures amid entrenched environmental challenges. Sexecology diverges from ecofeminism by rejecting essentialist linkages between femininity and nature, instead advancing a queer-inflected framework that extends erotic relationality to all human identities beyond gendered oppression narratives. Ecofeminism typically frames environmental degradation as intertwined with patriarchal domination over women, emphasizing caregiving roles and sex-gender hierarchies as causal factors in ecological harm. In contrast, sexecology universalizes sensuality as a pathway to environmental affinity, prioritizing performative pleasure and bodily engagement over critiques of systemic hierarchy. Relative to , which posits the intrinsic value of all life forms irrespective of human interests and advocates biocentric , sexecology maintains a more orientation by foregrounding human-derived erotic fulfillment through direct sensory interactions with natural elements. critiques as a root of ecological crisis, seeking expanded ethical circles that diminish human exceptionalism. Sexecology, however, employs nature as a site for personal sensual , where human pleasure—via acts like caressing landscapes—serves as the primary mechanism for fostering ecological attachment, rather than subordinating human desires to . Although sexecology incorporates left-leaning rhetoric critiquing industrial for alienating individuals from erotic bonds with the , it emphasizes individualistic eros over collective anti-capitalist restructuring. The Ecosex Manifesto articulates this through personal affirmations, such as pledging sensory love for natural entities, framing as intimate self-expression rather than institutionalized opposition to economic systems. This personalizes ecological commitment, distinguishing it from broader ideological movements that prioritize structural .

Practices and Methodologies

Ecosexual Performances and Weddings

Ecosexual performances and weddings constitute the core ritualistic practices of sexecology, enacted as public ceremonies where participants symbolically marry natural elements to foster erotic bonds with the environment. These events, initiated by and , typically involve exchanging vows of commitment to the chosen entity—such as , , , or mountains—often recited by participants and attendees alike, followed by symbolic acts of consummation including , rolling in dirt, and simulated or energetic orgasms to express with . The inaugural ecosexual wedding occurred on May 17, 2008, in , where Stephens and Sprinkle married the in a green-themed attended by over 350 guests, featuring vows to "become your lover" through sensory engagement and no material gifts, emphasizing relational reciprocity instead. Subsequent weddings expanded this format: on November 6, 2010, at , they wed the in a purple-themed event protesting mountaintop removal extraction, incorporating vows and acts like embracing rocky terrains to highlight ecological vulnerability. In total, 21 such large-scale weddings were performed across nine countries from 2008 to around 2017, targeting elements like soil (May Day 2014, Krems, Austria, "Dirty Wedding"), (July 23, 2011, , , "Black Wedding"), and water bodies, with rituals adapting to local contexts such as purchasing symbolic objects or hydrofeminist elements in later iterations. These performances often served as experiential advocacy against , as seen in the Gauley Mountain actions tied to the 2010 Appalachian wedding, where participants engaged in eroticized protests—such as nude interactions with the —to draw attention to strip mining's impacts in , framing the mountains as lovers deserving protection rather than resources. Events drew small to moderate artistic audiences, typically integrated into festivals or university settings rather than aiming for widespread mobilization, and were documented through and video for archival purposes, underscoring their role as intimate, embodied declarations over mass spectacle.

Workshops, Education, and Community Engagement

Sexecological walking tours, initiated by Annie Sprinkle and Beth Stephens as early as November 2009 in locations such as Boston Public Garden, involve guided explorations of urban and natural sites to highlight "ecosexy" features and encourage participants to perceive the Earth through an erotic lens rather than solely maternal metaphors. These tours incorporate sensory stimulation exercises, such as identifying personal "e-spots" in landscapes and learning specified methods like the "25 ways to make love to the Earth," without involving explicit sexual acts. Hands-on workshops emphasize for "ecosexual embodiment," featuring group and individual activities like sensual nature walks and erotic exercises designed to foster intimate connections with environmental elements, often conducted since the in settings prohibiting or overt sexuality. For instance, sessions at galleries or academic venues guide participants in shifting attitudes toward via bodily awareness practices, though documented participant feedback remains anecdotal and primarily artist-reported, with no large-scale empirical studies verifying long-term attitudinal changes. Educational outreach occurs through university visits and festivals, such as Stephens' role as a UC Santa Cruz professor hosting ecosex symposiums with themed discussions on elements like fire, and guest artist appearances at institutions including the in 2023, where performative lectures aim to integrate ecosexuality into and environmental curricula. These formats prioritize immersive over traditional lecturing, yet evidence of broader adoption in academic programs is sparse, limited to niche artistic contexts. Community engagement manifests in small, self-identified groups embracing terms like "ecoslut" to denote playful, promiscuous environmental affinity, emerging from Sprinkle and Stephens' collaborative networks since the early 2000s. However, verifiable data on sustained participation or community formation is minimal, with interactions largely tied to event-based gatherings rather than enduring organizations, and no peer-reviewed analyses confirming widespread or lasting engagement beyond enthusiast circles.

Media Productions and Representations

Films and Documentaries

"Water Makes Us Wet: An Ecosexual Adventure," directed by Beth Stephens and , premiered at documenta 14 in and was theatrically released on , 2019. The 80-minute documentary follows the filmmakers, along with their dog Butch, in a mobile E.A.R.T.H. Lab unit across , examining water's sensual, vital, and contested roles through ecosexual performances, interviews with biologists, water workers, and scholars, and calls for empathetic environmental engagement. It screened at festivals including BFI Flare and Real Art Ways, and is available for streaming on platforms like JunoNow, emphasizing artistic advocacy over empirical analysis to popularize the lover metaphor for nature. "Goodbye Gauley Mountain: An Ecosexual Love Story," also co-directed by Stephens and Sprinkle, was released in 2013. This autobiographical feature documents their "pollen-amorous" relationship with the , including an ecosexual wedding to Gauley Mountain on July 23, 2011, amid against mountaintop removal in , which has destroyed over 500 mountains since the . Narrated by Stephens, who traces her roots to local coal-mining families, the film interweaves personal coming-out narratives, community vows for protection, and protests to rally and environmental groups, screening internationally at venues in , , , , , and U.S. festivals. It prioritizes metaphorical , such as tree-hugging rituals, without presenting scientific data on mining impacts beyond claims. "Playing with Fire: An Ecosexual Emergency," the third in their ecosexual documentary trilogy, premiered on June 20, 2025, at Frameline49 in . Running 71 minutes, the mythopoetic work addresses wildfires—exacerbated by , with over 4.5 million acres burned in 2020 alone—through ecosexual rituals, artist interviews, and themes of loss, grief, and mutual care, urging viewers to treat fire as a lover rather than a foe. Co-directed by Stephens and Sprinkle, it builds on prior films' autoethnographic style to blend queer with , premiering amid ongoing wildfire seasons that displaced thousands annually, though it advances performative persuasion absent rigorous causal evidence. Screenings continue at select festivals, reinforcing Sexecology's dissemination via narrative-driven media.

Publications and Artistic Outputs

The Ecosex Manifesto, first drafted in versions such as 1.0 and later iterations like 2.0, serves as a foundational text for Sexecology, articulating principles of ecosexuality through declarations like "We are Ecosexuals: the Earth is our lover" and advocating for sustainable, pleasure-based environmental engagement. Co-authored by Annie Sprinkle and Beth Stephens with contributions from collaborators including Natalie Loveless and Sha LaBare, it was officially launched to initiate the ecosex movement around 2010, though public drafts appeared in art publications by 2014. The manifesto emphasizes erotic connections to natural elements, such as caressing rocks or being pleasured by waterfalls, and has circulated primarily within performance art and queer ecology communities rather than mainstream environmental literature. Books by Sprinkle and Stephens further disseminate Sexecological ideas, with Assuming the Ecosexual Position: The Earth as Lover (University of Minnesota Press, 2017) detailing their ecosexual practices, including "marrying" natural elements and integrating sex-positive with ecological . This work chronicles personal and artistic explorations of ecosexuality, positioning the as a relational partner to foster mutual , and includes elements like childhood anecdotes leading to ecosexual orientations. A more recent publication, The Explorer's Guide to Planet Orgasm—For Every Body, functions as an ecosex-inspired text drawing analogies from , sky, and sea to promote embodied environmental awareness. These texts have influenced niche audiences in and , evidenced by their use in symposia and academic discussions on ecologies, without broad adoption in conventional scholarship. Artistic outputs complement these writings through print media like posters and collages tied to Sexecological themes, such as designs for Earthlab Ecosex Symposia promoting erotic-ecological unions. Exhibitions featuring ecosex collages and visual manifestos, often displayed alongside textual elements, extend manifesto principles into tangible art forms circulated at events like the Queer Cultural Center's Ecosex Symposium in 2016. These materials, including posters from UC Santa Cruz lectures, emphasize visual metaphors of human-nature intimacy and have been shared in networks, reinforcing Sexecology's focus on sensory, non-anthropocentric relationality without penetrating wider ecological discourse.

Criticisms and Controversies

Empirical and Scientific Skepticism

Critics contend that sexecology lacks empirical validation for its purported environmental benefits, as no peer-reviewed studies have demonstrated causal links between ecosexual practices—like performances or weddings—and measurable outcomes such as reduced levels or increased conservation behaviors. Descriptions of the movement emphasize artistic expression and personal erotic connections to , but these accounts rely on qualitative narratives rather than quantitative metrics or randomized trials to assess . The anthropomorphization central to sexecology, wherein the and its elements are framed as lovers amenable to erotic seduction, invites akin to critiques of projecting onto non- systems, which can impede objective analysis of ecological dynamics. Scientific literature highlights the risks of such attributions in distorting biological and geophysical realities, potentially substituting untested for data-informed models of . While ecosexual activism may foster subjective affinity for nature, broader research on performative environmental interventions suggests they often fail to drive systemic change without pairing with evidence-based policies or technological innovations, as personal catharsis does not reliably translate to reduced consumption or habitat restoration at scale. This aligns with evaluations indicating that art-driven efforts, though culturally resonant, divert resources from rigorously tested strategies like emissions pricing or habitat restoration programs.

Cultural, Ethical, and Practical Critiques

Critics from conservative perspectives have argued that sexecology promotes moral decay by eroticizing natural elements, framing such acts as a form of perverse or that deviates from traditional ethical norms of confined to interpersonal relations. For instance, commentator Michael Knowles described ecosexuality as "extreme " akin to fetishism, suggesting it encourages unnatural indulgences that undermine familial and societal structures. Similarly, the Cornwall Alliance labeled ecosexual weddings as "theater of the absurd," contending that they trivialize sacred commitments and foster ethical in intimacy. Ethical objections also extend to concerns over normalizing fetishes detached from human consent and reciprocity, with detractors positing that anthropomorphizing the environment as a blurs boundaries between consensual adult relations and of non-sentient entities. Some feminist commentators have critiqued this shift from revering nature as "Mother Earth" to "Lover Earth" as potentially commodifying eros in ways that prioritize individual pleasure over collective ecological stewardship, echoing broader sex-positive debates where excess untethers intimacy from relational ethics. Culturally, sexecology has faced accusations of appropriation, particularly from indigenous viewpoints that emphasize spiritual reverence for land over eroticization, which some see as a superficial adoption of native motifs by non-indigenous practitioners without historical or communal . Indigenous scholar , while engaging ecosexuality, noted its relative novelty and invited critiques for potentially overlooking decolonial relationalities rooted in kinship rather than sexual metaphor. This tension highlights a perceived dissonance between sexecology's performative sensuality and indigenous traditions viewing as kin demanding respect, not seduction. Practically, opponents contend that sexecology distracts from substantive conservation efforts, as symbolic performances like ecosexual weddings fail to address ongoing environmental harms such as , which persisted despite related activism in . Critics argue this focus on personal erotic fulfillment risks portraying as frivolous, alienating mainstream supporters and diverting resources from policy-driven protections, with industry narratives amplifying perceptions of activists as morally lax "wingnuts." Such critiques underscore that while sexecology aims to foster emotional bonds with , it may inadvertently undermine urgency for tangible interventions like habitat restoration or emissions reductions.

Reception, Impact, and Legacy

Achievements in Awareness and Art

Sexecology's artistic contributions include pioneering performances that fuse sexuality with ecological themes, notably the "Dirty Sexecology: 25 Ways to Make Love to the " series, staged in the early , which incorporated elements like plant dialogues, stripteases, and soil-based intimacy to reframe human-nature bonds. These works extended to international venues, such as participation in documenta 14 in 2017, where Stephens and Sprinkle presented ecosexual manifestos emphasizing sensory engagement with landscapes like rocks and waterfalls. Exhibitions like "Lover Earth: Art and Ecosexuality" at Skidmore College's Tang Teaching Museum in 2020 curated paintings, prints, photographs, and videos from their oeuvre, highlighting ecosexuality's role in transforming anthropocentric views of nature into relational, erotic paradigms within collections. Such innovations have influenced niche eco-art and festivals, including ecosex symposiums at spaces like Highways Performance Space in Santa Monica since 2008, promoting embodied practices over didactic . In raising awareness, sexecology's Ecosex Manifesto, articulated around 2011, received coverage in outlets like Outside magazine in 2016, positioning it as a flexible activism-identity hybrid to broaden ecological appeal beyond conventional protests. Similarly, a 2022 Sierra Club feature described ecosexuality as a queer-oriented strategy for environmental engagement, citing performances that encourage pleasure-driven motivations for audiences detached from mainstream conservation narratives. These efforts manifest in creative, policy-adjacent actions, such as the 2016 Ecosexual Bathhouse at the Pony Express festival, where participants enacted sensual rituals with earth elements to evoke stewardship through direct sensory immersion rather than abstract advocacy. While confined to avant-garde and queer communities, this has sustained discourse in specialized art and environmental circles, evidenced by inclusions in peer-reviewed ecological humanities discussions and ongoing symposium formats.

Limitations and Broader Influence

Despite its origins in and activist interventions since 2008, sexecology has persisted as a niche endeavor confined largely to academic, artistic, and communities, failing to generate measurable mainstream traction or policy impacts by 2025. Proponents' emphasis on erotic metaphors for environmental engagement has not translated into broader adoption, with activities remaining centered on symposia, films, and performances rather than scalable advocacy. This limitation underscores a potential unintended effect: the association of ecological imperatives with risks inviting ridicule, thereby diluting public discourse on urgent issues like loss and emissions reduction, as evidenced by media portrayals framing such acts as eccentric rather than substantive. Sexecology's influence manifests in ripples within sex-positive environmentalism and queer ecological theory, where it challenges anthropocentric norms by reframing human-nature relations as intimate partnerships, influencing niche discussions on relational ethics. However, critiques highlight its alignment with performative activism rooted in left-leaning queer frameworks, which critics argue limits universality by prioritizing identity-based erotics over evidence-based strategies applicable across demographics. Empirical assessments note no causal links to tangible outcomes like reduced deforestation rates or policy reforms, contrasting with pragmatic interventions—such as the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act's $369 billion in clean energy investments passed in 2022—that have demonstrably advanced emissions targets without relying on metaphorical shifts. Prospects for expansion appear constrained, with post-2020 developments showing continuity in artistic outputs but no acceleration toward institutional integration, amid competition from data-driven approaches emphasizing and economic incentives over symbolic gestures. This stagnation reflects a broader pattern where ideologically specific movements yield cultural echoes but falter in fostering widespread behavioral or systemic change, potentially reinforcing perceptions of as elitist or detached from practical .

References

  1. https://theecosexuals.ucsc.edu/ecosex/
  2. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/manifestos/
  3. https://elizabethstephens.org/dirty-sexecology-25-ways-to-make-love-to-the-earth/
  4. https://theecosexuals.ucsc.edu/ecosexualmanifesto/
  5. https://www.academia.edu/34057259/Sexecology_Its_a_real_thing
  6. https://earth.fm/earth-stories/introduction-ecosexuality-movement/
  7. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/ecosex-weddings/
  8. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/bios-and-cvs/
  9. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/2010/11/06/purple-wedding/
  10. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/2012/01/19/ecosex-symposium-2/
  11. https://elizabethstephens.org/artists-statement/
  12. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/
  13. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/projects/dirty-sexecology-25-ways-to-make-love-to-the-earth/
  14. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gds0myOHae4
  15. https://en.ecopoiesis.ru/aktualnoe/news_post/sprinkle-annie-and-stephens-beth-ecosexuality-the-story-of-our-love-with-the-eart
  16. https://news.ucsc.edu/2025/07/art-activism-and-ecosexuality-converge-in-beth-stephens-new-film-playing-with-fire/
  17. https://www.goodtimes.sc/making-problems-sexy/
  18. https://www.thelab.org/projects/2025/10/17/an-ecosexual-walking-tour-in-search-of-the-elusive-boobie-bird
  19. https://datebook.sfchronicle.com/books/annie-sprinkle-and-beth-stephens-help-writer-assume-the-ecosexual-position
  20. https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/sprinkle-annie-m-1954
  21. https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/the-life-and-work-of-annie-sprinkle/
  22. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/may/15/nature-ecosexual-annie-sprinkle-porn-star-queer
  23. https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/take-earth-date-inside-ecosexuality-movement
  24. https://vortexrep.org/23_sexology
  25. https://www.upress.umn.edu/9781517900199/assuming-the-ecosexual-position/
  26. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0969725X.2019.1684702
  27. https://ari.ucsc.edu/2025/02/24/beth-stephens/
  28. https://campusdirectory.ucsc.edu/cd_detail?uid=estephe
  29. https://goodbyegauleymountain.ucsc.edu/
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353453100_From_ecofeminism_to_ecosexuality_Queering_the_environmental_movement
  31. https://theecosexuals.ucsc.edu/contributors/
  32. https://mostmagazine.org/2024/07/24/everyone-and-everything-deserves-love-and-pleasure-an-interview-with-annie-sprinkle-beth-stephens-cyber_nymphs-ewelina-jarosz-and-justyna-gorowska-and-joy-brooke-fairfield/
  33. http://sexecology.org/resources/
  34. https://theecosexuals.ucsc.edu/about/
  35. https://indigenoussts.com/whats-in-ecosexuality-for-an-indigenous-scholar-of-nature/
  36. https://www.femininemoments.dk/blog/stephens-sprinkle-and-the-ecosexual-movement/
  37. http://sexecology.org/education/visiting-artist-lecture-presentations/
  38. https://thegreendivas.com/2015/07/02/dirty-sexecology-25-ways-to-make-love-to-the-earth/
  39. https://sexecology.org/symposiums/
  40. https://earthlabsf.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Assuming-the-Ecosexual-Position-sample.pdf
  41. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-111522-103028
  42. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0969725X.2025.2554174
  43. https://www.academia.edu/6147985/From_Ecofeminism_to_Ecosexuality_Queering_the_Environmental_Movement
  44. http://www.religionandnature.com/ern/sample/Taylor--DeepEcology.pdf
  45. https://social-ecology.org/wp/1995/08/theses-on-social-ecology-and-deep-ecology/
  46. https://amethystcounselor.com/the-pleasure-pathway/f/ecosexuality-deep-ecological-theory-and-reconnecting-with-nature
  47. https://loveartlab.ucsc.edu/2016/06/13/green-wedding-vows/
  48. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/2008/05/17/wedding-to-the-earth/
  49. https://research.uvh.nl/files/62047203/Hengel_2023_-_Love_in_the_sacrifice_zone.pdf
  50. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/2014/06/25/wedding-to-the-dirt/
  51. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/2011/07/23/coal/
  52. https://filmmakermagazine.com/96403-eco-sexuality-mountaintop-removal-and-goodbye-gauley-mountain/
  53. https://sexecology.org/sexecological-walking-tours/
  54. https://anniesprinkle.org/college-offerings/eco-sexy-walking-tour-with-annie-sprinkle-ph-d/
  55. https://hangar.org/en/arxiu/tallers-de-sexecologia-amb-annie-sprinkle-i-beth-stephens/
  56. https://sexecology.org/sexecological-walking-tour-with-elizabeth-stephens-annie-sprinkle/
  57. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/category/ecosex-symposiums/
  58. https://www.drama.uga.edu/news/stories/2023/visiting-artists-annie-sprinkle-beth-stephens
  59. http://www.grahambelltornado.com/rituals/ecosex/
  60. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9854782/
  61. https://www.documenta14.de/en/calendar/22345/water-makes-us-wet-an-ecosexual-adventure
  62. https://watermakesuswet.ucsc.edu/
  63. https://www.documentary.org/exclusive-news/exclusive-clip-beth-stephens-and-annie-sprinkles-playing-fire-ecosexual-emergency
  64. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/projects/goodbye-gauley-mountain-an-ecosexual-coming-out-story/
  65. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2506018/
  66. https://mds.marshall.edu/asa_conference/2014/Full/185/
  67. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt36997965/
  68. https://www.frameline.org/films/frameline49/playing-with-fire-an-ecosexual-emergency
  69. https://roxie.com/film/frameline49-playing-with-fire-an-ecosexual-emergency/
  70. https://brooklynrail.org/2014/09/criticspage/ecosex-manifesto-draft-10-of-a-work-in-progress/
  71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90012820.pdf
  72. https://www.amazon.com/Assuming-Ecosexual-Position-Earth-Lover/dp/1517900190
  73. https://sprinklestephens.ucsc.edu/assuming-the-ecosexual-position/
  74. https://visualgrammarlab.com/ecosex-symposia-posters/
  75. https://queerculturalcenter.org/ecosexual-symposium/
  76. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2rw748rb
  77. https://www.nature.com/articles/428606a
  78. https://www.truthaboutfur.com/anthropomorphism-and-conservation/
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343522000513
  80. https://cornwallalliance.org/its-not-your-grandparents-wedding/
  81. https://www.facebook.com/michaelknowlesshow/videos/ecosexuality-is-extreme-nature-worship/1397907920891161/
  82. https://www.counterpointknowledge.org/erotic-ecology-ecosexuals-and-f-for-forest/
  83. https://www.brusselstimes.com/565698/ecosexuality-love-and-nature-artistic-performance-causes-controversy-in-france
  84. https://www.teenvogue.com/story/ecosexual
  85. https://www.documenta14.de/en/artists/13487/annie-sprinkle-and-beth-stephens
  86. https://tang.skidmore.edu/exhibitions/281-lover-earth-art-and-ecosexuality
  87. https://www.outsideonline.com/culture/books-media/were-all-little-ecosexual/
  88. https://mashable.com/article/ecosexual-art-pony-express
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.