Community hub
0 subscribers8 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Stackable switch.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Stackable switch
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
A stackable switch is a network switch that is fully functional operating standalone but which can also be set up to operate together with one or more other network switches, with this group of switches showing the characteristics of a single switch but having the port capacity of the sum of the combined switches.
The term stack refers to the group of switches that have been set up in this way.
The common characteristic of a stack acting as a single switch is that there is a single IP address for remote administration of the stack as a whole, not an IP address for the administration of each unit in the stack.
Stackable switches are customarily Ethernet, rack-mounted, managed switches of 1–2 rack unit (RU) in size, with a fixed set of data ports on the front. Some models have slots for optional slide-in modules to add ports or features to the base stackable unit. The most common configurations are 24-port and 48-port models.
Comparison with other switch architectures
[edit]A stackable switch is distinct from a standalone switch, which only operates as a single entity. A stackable switch is distinct from a switch modular chassis.
Benefits
[edit]Stackable switches have these benefits:
- Simplified network administration: Whether a stackable switch operates alone or “stacked” with other units, there is always just a single management interface for the network administrator to deal with. This simplifies the setup and operation of the network.
- Scalability: A small network can be formed around a single stackable unit, and then the network can grow with additional units over time if and when needed, with little added management complexity.
- Deployment flexibility: Stackable switches can operate together with other stackable switches or can operate independently. Units one day can be combined as a stack in a single site, and later can be run in different locations as independent switches.
- Resilient connections: In some vendor architectures, active connections can be spread across multiple units so that should one unit in a stack be removed or fail, data will continue to flow through other units that remain functional.
- Improving backplane: A series of switches, when stacked together, improves the backplane of the switches in stack also.[citation needed]
Drawbacks
[edit]Compared with a modular chassis switch, stackable switches have these drawbacks:
- For locations needing numerous ports, a modular chassis may cost less. With stackable switching, each unit in a stack has its own enclosure and at minimum a single power supply. With modular switching, there is one enclosure and one set of power supplies.
- High-end modular switches have high-resiliency / high-redundancy features not available in all stackable architectures.
- Additional overhead when sending stacking data between switches. Some stacking protocols add additional headers to frames, further increasing overhead.
Functionality
[edit]Features associated with stackable switches can include:
- Single IP address for multiple units. Multiple switches can share one IP address for administrative purposes, thus conserving IP addresses.
- Single management view from multiple interfaces. Stack-level views and commands can be provided from a single command line interface (CLI) and/or embedded Web interface. The SNMP view into the stack can be unified.
- Stacking resiliency. Multiple switches can have ways to bypass a “down” switch in a stack, thus allowing the remaining units to function as a stack even with a failed or removed unit.
- Layer 3 redundancy. Some stackable architectures allow for continued Layer 3 routing if there is a “down” switch in a stack. If routing is centralized in one unit in the stack, and that unit fails, then there must be a recovery mechanism to move routing to a backup unit in the stack.
- Mix and match of technology. Some stackable architectures allow for mixing switches of different technologies or from different product families, yet still achieve unified management. For example, some stacking allows for mixing of 10/100 and gigabit switches in a stack.
- Dedicated stacking bandwidth. Some switches come with built-in ports dedicated for stacking, which can preserve other ports for data network connections and can avoid the possible expense of an additional module to add stacking. Proprietary data handling or cables can be used to achieve higher bandwidths than standard gigabit or 10-gigabit connections.
- Link aggregation of ports on different units in the stack. Some stacking technologies allow for link aggregation from ports on different stacked switches either to other switches not in the stack (for example a core network) or to allow servers and other devices to have multiple connections to the stack for improved redundancy and throughput. Not all stackable switches support link aggregation across the stack.
There is not universal agreement as to the threshold for being a stackable versus being a standalone switch. Some companies call their switches stackable if they support a single IP address for multiple units even if they lack other features from this list. Some industry analysts[who?] have said a product is not a stackable if it lacks one of the above features (e.g., dedicated bandwidth).
Terminology
[edit]Here are other terms associated with stackable switches:
- Stacking backplane
- Used to describe the connections between stacked units, and the bandwidth of that connection. Most typically, switches that have primarily Fast Ethernet ports would have at minimum gigabit connections for its stacking backplane; likewise, switches that primarily have Gigabit Ethernet ports would have at minimum 10-gigabit connections.
- Clustering
- The term sometimes used for a stacking approach that focuses on unified management with a single IP address for multiple stackable units. Units can be distributed and of multiple types.
- Stack master or commander
- In some stack architectures, one unit is designated the main unit of the stack. All management is routed through that single master unit. Some call this the master or commander unit. Other units in the stack are referred to as slave or member units.
See also
[edit]Further reading
[edit]- What is a “Stackable Management Switch”?, EUSSO Technologies, 2003.
- Small Business Stackable Switch White Paper, NETGEAR Inc., 2001.
- Cisco StackWise and StackWise Plus Technology, Cisco Systems.
Stackable switch
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
A stackable switch is a network switch designed to operate either as a standalone device or interconnected with one or more compatible switches via dedicated stacking ports and cables, forming a single logical unit that functions as one unified system with shared management and expanded port capacity.[1] This configuration allows multiple physical switches—known as stack members—to share a single IP address and be managed centrally through a master switch, simplifying network administration in enterprise environments.[2]
Stacking technology typically involves three core components: member switches (including a master for control, a backup for redundancy, and additional members), stack ports for high-speed interconnections, and specialized stack cables that enable data and control plane sharing.[3] Common topologies include daisy-chain (linear connection for simplicity), ring (for redundancy with failover paths), and full mesh (for maximum bandwidth but higher complexity), with stacking bandwidth reaching up to 200 Gbps or more in modern implementations as of 2025.[3] Unlike non-stackable switches, which require individual configuration and separate IP addresses, stackable models support seamless scalability, such as Cisco's Catalyst 9200 series allowing up to eight switches in a stack for a unified system with aggregated Ethernet ports ranging from Gigabit to 10 Gigabit speeds.[4]
The primary advantages of stackable switches include simplified management through centralized configuration and monitoring, enhanced reliability via redundancy (e.g., automatic failover if the master switch fails), and increased network performance from port aggregation and higher overall bandwidth.[3] They also offer greater flexibility for expanding networks without extensive rewiring, making them suitable for growing data centers, campuses, and SMB infrastructures where port density needs to scale dynamically.[1] However, drawbacks include vendor-specific compatibility (limiting stacks to the same series and manufacturer), potential service disruptions during stack expansion or maintenance, and a single point of failure risk if the master switch experiences issues before failover occurs.[3] Overall, stackable switches represent an evolution in networking hardware, transitioning from premium features in the 1990s to standard capabilities in contemporary enterprise-grade equipment for improved scalability and efficiency.[5]
This process occurs during initial boot or stack reformation.[20] Once elected, the master synchronizes configurations across the stack, including VLAN definitions, QoS policies, and firmware versions; for example, Aruba VSF automatically propagates VLAN and QoS settings via its unified control plane, while Cisco employs Stateful Switchover (SSO) for real-time synchronization.[21][20]
In the data plane, frames are forwarded across stacked units through shared forwarding tables, enabling the stack to operate as a single logical switch. The master maintains a centralized MAC address table (or FIB in routed scenarios) that is distributed to member ASICs, allowing local forwarding where possible and inter-unit traversal via stacking links when needed; Cisco's spatial-reuse forwarding optimizes this by stripping headers at the destination switch to reduce overhead.[20] Hitless failover ensures sub-second switchover times, typically under 50 ms in Cisco StackWise Virtual setups, where the standby assumes control without disrupting ongoing traffic flows.[24] Aruba VSF similarly provides seamless failover in ring topologies, with the standby member taking over if the primary fails, maintaining shared MAC tables for continuity.[21]
Error handling focuses on detecting and recovering from link failures to maintain stack integrity. In ring topologies, a single link failure degrades the stack to a chain without partition, halving available bandwidth until restoration, as implemented in both Cisco StackWise and Aruba VSF.[20][21] For more advanced scenarios, Cisco's StackWise Virtual, introduced in 2017, uses dual-active detection protocols like Fast Hello or Enhanced PAgP over StackWise Virtual Links (SVLs)—formed as EtherChannels with 10G/40G/100G ports—to identify and resolve split-brain conditions from link failures, triggering recovery modes that disable non-primary ports within 50-100 ms.[24] Configuring StackWise Virtual on two Catalyst 9500 switches requires several prerequisites: both switches must be the same model, running the same IOS XE version, with the same Network Advantage license and SDM template; supported high-speed interfaces must be used for SVLs at the same speed, with at least two SVLs required; and an optional Dual-Active Detection (DAD) link can be configured.[25] If connectivity to both active and standby is lost, affected members may reload to re-elect roles and rejoin the stack.[20]
Overview and History
Definition and Basic Principles
A stackable switch is a type of Ethernet network switch that can operate independently but is designed to interconnect multiple physical units via dedicated stacking ports or high-speed cables, enabling them to function as a single logical switch with unified management and configuration.[1][6] This architecture allows for seamless expansion of port density without the complexity of managing separate devices, treating the entire stack as one entity for tasks like VLAN configuration and traffic forwarding.[7] The basic principles of stackable switches revolve around aggregating resources across units to enhance scalability and efficiency. Stacking enables port aggregation, where all ports from connected switches appear as part of a unified pool, increasing overall capacity without requiring additional uplink connections between devices. It also features a shared control plane, centralizing management functions such as spanning tree protocol decisions and routing tables on a single master unit, which simplifies administration compared to daisy-chaining independent switches via standard Ethernet links. Additionally, dedicated stacking cables reduce cabling complexity by providing high-bandwidth, low-latency interconnections, often at speeds exceeding 100 Gbps in modern implementations, thereby minimizing bottlenecks and improving resilience.[8][9][3] Core components of a stackable switch include stacking modules or ports, which are specialized interfaces for inter-switch links, and a dynamic master/slave election process that automatically selects one unit as the master to handle control plane operations while others act as slaves forwarding data under its direction. The election typically occurs at boot-up based on factors like priority, MAC address, or software version, ensuring high availability if the master fails. Stackable designs commonly employ ring or daisy-chain topologies for connectivity: in a ring topology, switches connect in a closed loop via stacking cables for redundancy (e.g., if one link fails, traffic reroutes bidirectionally), while daisy-chain forms a linear sequence ending with the master, offering simplicity but less fault tolerance. A basic stack topology might visualize three switches linked in a ring, with bidirectional stacking cables between each pair, allowing the stack to present 144 ports (assuming 48-port units) under single-IP management.[7][10][11] The first commercial stackable switches emerged in the mid-1990s, with early adopters like Cisco and 3Com introducing models to address growing demands for scalable LAN deployments in enterprise environments.[12]Evolution and Key Milestones
The concept of stackable switches emerged in the mid-1990s as local area networks (LANs) expanded rapidly, necessitating solutions for simplified management and scalability in enterprise environments. Traditional standalone switches struggled with the growing complexity of network configurations, prompting the development of stacking technologies that allowed multiple units to operate as a single logical device with unified control. This innovation addressed key needs such as a single IP address for management and reduced cabling overhead, marking an early shift toward more efficient network architectures.[12][12] A pivotal milestone occurred in 2003 when Cisco introduced StackWise technology with the Catalyst 3750 series, enabling high-speed stacking of up to nine switches via proprietary cables that formed a bidirectional ring topology for resilient data transfer at 32 Gbps. This advancement popularized stackable switches in enterprise deployments by offering seamless redundancy and simplified operations without the cost of modular chassis systems. Throughout the 2000s, proprietary stacking remained dominant, but the decade saw increasing vendor adoption, including from 3Com and Enterasys, driven by demands for gigabit Ethernet in SMB and campus networks.[13][13] In the 2010s, stackable switch technology transitioned toward higher performance and broader interoperability, with the adoption of 10G and 40G stacking links accelerating around 2011-2012 to support data center and aggregation needs. For instance, NETGEAR launched the industry's first smart switch with 10G SFP+ stacking ports in 2011, allowing up to six units to stack for 288 ports, while Cisco extended its portfolio to 40G/100G capabilities in 2012, enhancing throughput for bandwidth-intensive applications. This period also saw a move toward more standardized high-speed interfaces, reducing reliance on fully proprietary protocols and facilitating multi-vendor environments.[14][15][14] By the 2020s, stackable switches integrated with software-defined networking (SDN) and automation frameworks, enabling programmable management and dynamic resource allocation in cloud-native infrastructures. Vendors like HPE Aruba advanced high-density stacking with the CX 6300 and 8100 series, supporting up to 100G ports and Virtual Stacking Framework for up to 10 units, while Juniper's QFX and EX series incorporated 100G QSFP28 interfaces with Virtual Chassis technology for scalable data center deployments.[16][17][18] These developments continued into 2024-2025, with innovations such as Arista's StackWise Automated Grouping (SWAG) technology, announced in December 2024 and available from Q2 2025, enabling intelligent stacking and management of up to 48 switches for campus networks, alongside increasing support for 400G interfaces to meet escalating bandwidth demands in AI-driven data centers.[19] These advancements have driven significant adoption in SMB and enterprise segments, contributing to market growth as stackables offer cost-effective scalability amid rising data demands.Technical Functionality
Stacking Mechanisms and Protocols
Stacking mechanisms in stackable switches primarily rely on dedicated hardware interfaces to interconnect multiple units, forming a unified system. These interfaces often include specialized stacking ports equipped with proprietary cables, such as Cisco's StackWise cables, which connect switches in a ring topology to provide redundancy and prevent single points of failure.[20] Alternatively, standard transceiver modules like SFP+ or higher-speed QSFP ports can be used, as seen in Aruba's Virtual Switching Framework (VSF), where 10G, 25G, or 50G Ethernet links serve as stacking connections without proprietary hardware.[21] Bandwidth allocation varies by implementation; for instance, Cisco StackWise-480 provides 480 Gbps of stacking bandwidth in a full-duplex ring configuration supporting up to eight switches, while Aruba VSF utilizes the full speed of the inter-switch links, typically 40 Gbps or more per link in ring setups.[20][21] Recent advancements as of 2024 include Arista's introduction of the Switch Aggregation Group (SWAG), which enables stacking using standard Ethernet links for simplified management in campus networks.[22] Similarly, Cisco's C9350 Series, launched in 2024, offers enhanced stackable fixed access switches with improved integration for AI and automation-driven environments.[23] Software protocols govern the operational unity of the stack, starting with master election algorithms to designate a primary control unit. In Cisco StackWise, election is priority-based, with the switch holding the highest configurable priority (ranging from 1 to 15) becoming the active master; ties are resolved by the lowest MAC address.[20] Aruba VSF defaults to the lowest-numbered member (e.g., Member 1) as the primary, with an optional secondary for standby redundancy.[21] A simple pseudocode representation of a priority-based election process, as used in StackWise, is as follows:initialize all_switches as candidates
for each switch in stack:
broadcast priority and MAC address
master = candidate with highest priority
if multiple candidates have highest priority:
master = candidate with lowest MAC address
notify all switches of master election
initialize all_switches as candidates
for each switch in stack:
broadcast priority and MAC address
master = candidate with highest priority
if multiple candidates have highest priority:
master = candidate with lowest MAC address
notify all switches of master election
Management and Scalability Features
Stackable switches provide unified management through a single IP address assigned to the entire stack, allowing administrators to configure and monitor all units as one logical device rather than managing each switch individually. This approach simplifies operations, with centralized command-line interface (CLI) access via protocols like SSH and web-based interfaces often integrated with SNMP for polling device status or REST APIs for programmatic control in modern implementations.[26] Software updates can be applied stack-wide from the master unit, propagating changes to all members without requiring individual logins, which reduces administrative overhead in enterprise environments.[27] Scalability in stackable switches is constrained by hardware limits, typically supporting 4 to 9 units per stack depending on the model and vendor; for instance, Cisco Catalyst 9300 series allows up to 8 switches, while HPE Aruba CX 6200F supports up to 8 members for a total of 384 ports in a configuration of 48-port units.[20] Expansion occurs by hot-adding units through dedicated stacking ports, where the new switch joins the stack after provisioning and reboot, often with minimal disruption if the stack topology remains intact; removal follows a similar process, powering down the unit and reconfiguring cabling to maintain ring redundancy without full stack downtime.[28] These limits ensure reliable performance, with stack bandwidth scaling to support inter-unit traffic, such as 480 Gbps in Cisco StackWise-480 implementations. Monitoring capabilities include integrated tools for stack health visualization, such as dashboards displaying unit status (e.g., active, standby, or member roles), overall bandwidth utilization, and redundancy verification through commands like Cisco'sshow switch detail.[29] SNMP traps alert on events like member failures or high utilization, while third-party systems like ManageEngine OpManager provide stack-specific views of metrics, including stack ring speed (e.g., 320 Gbps in certain Aruba VSF configurations) and port-level throughput to preempt bottlenecks.[30] These features enable proactive maintenance, ensuring the stack operates as a cohesive system.
Since around 2015, stackable switches have integrated with automation frameworks for enhanced scalability, supporting zero-touch provisioning (ZTP) where new units auto-download configurations via DHCP upon connection, compatible with tools like Cisco DNA Center or Aruba Central.[31] Ansible playbooks facilitate stack-wide scripting for tasks like firmware upgrades or policy enforcement, allowing orchestration across multiple stacks in large deployments without manual intervention.[32]