Hubbry Logo
Tangential speechTangential speechMain
Open search
Tangential speech
Community hub
Tangential speech
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tangential speech
Tangential speech
Tangential speech
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Tangential speech or tangentiality is a communication disorder in which the train of thought of the speaker wanders and shows a lack of focus, never returning to the initial topic of the conversation.[1] It commonly occurs in situations where an individual experiences high anxiety, as a manifestation of acute psychosis, dementia, or states of delirium.[2] It is less severe than logorrhea and may be associated with the middle stage in dementia.[1] It is, however, more severe than circumstantial speech, in which the speaker wanders but eventually returns to the topic.[3]

Some adults with right hemisphere brain damage exhibit tangential speech.[4] Those who exhibit tangential speech may also have related symptoms, such as seemingly inappropriate, self-centered social responses and deteriorations in conversation capabilities (including maintaining appropriate eye contact and staying on topic).[5]

Definition

[edit]

The term refers simplistically to a thought disorder shown from speech with a lack of observance to the main subject of discourse, such that a person whilst speaking on a topic deviates from the topic. Further definition is of speech that deviates from an answer to a question that is relevant in the first instance but deviates from the relevancy to related subjects not involved in a direct answering of the question.[6][7][8] In the context of a conversation or discussion the communication is a response that is ineffective in that the form is inappropriate for adequate understanding.[9] The person's speech seems to indicate that their attention to their own speech has perhaps in some way been overcome during the occurrence of cognition whilst speaking, causing the vocalized content to follow thought that is apparently without reference to the original idea or question; or the person's speech is considered evasive in that the person has decided to provide an answer to a question that is an avoidance of a direct answer.[2]

History

[edit]

The earlier phenomenological description (Schneider et al. 1930[full citation needed]) allowed for further definition on the basis of formal characteristic rather than content, producing later practice relying upon clinical assessment (Andreasen 1979).[10] The term has undergone a redefinition to refer only to a person's speech in response to a question, and to provide the definition separation from the similar symptoms loosening of association and derailment (Andreasen 1979).[6][11]

Other

[edit]

According to the St. Louis system for the diagnosis of schizophrenia,[12] tangentiality is significantly associated with a low IQ prior to diagnosis (AU Parnas et al 2007).[13]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tangential speech

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Tangential speech, also referred to as tangentiality, is a disturbance in the thought process manifested as verbal communication in which the speaker repeatedly diverges from the original subject, providing excessive or irrelevant details without ever returning to the central point or directly answering a question. This pattern arises from disorganized thought processes or impaired ability to maintain focus, resulting in oblique speech that constantly digresses to unrelated topics. In clinical contexts, tangential speech is distinguished from similar speech disturbances, such as , where the individual includes unnecessary details but eventually circles back to the main idea. Unlike , tangential responses never reach the intended goal, leaving the original query unresolved and often frustrating communication. It is assessed as part of the , particularly under the evaluation of thought process, where normal cognition is linear and goal-directed. Tangential speech is commonly associated with various psychiatric and neurological conditions, including psychotic disorders like , mood disorders with psychotic features such as , obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizotypal or narcissistic personality disorders, , and neurodegenerative diseases. It serves as a marker of formal , which can impair social and functional interactions, and its presence or severity may indicate disease progression or response to treatment. In some cases, such as or early , it may appear alongside other irregularities like flight of ideas, where thought connections are rapid but loosely associated.

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

Tangential speech, also known as tangentiality, is a disorder of thought and communication characterized by the speaker's responses deviating from the original topic or question, instead wandering to unrelated or loosely associated ideas without ever returning to the central point. This pattern reflects a disruption in the logical flow of discourse, where the individual fails to maintain relevance to the inquiry posed. Within , tangential speech is classified as a form of formal , distinguished by its lack of goal-directedness in , whereby associations between ideas become oblique and indirect, preventing the attainment of a coherent response. It differs from other speech anomalies by emphasizing the complete evasion of the topic rather than mere or elaboration. The term "tangential speech" derives its name from the geometric concept of a , which describes a line that touches a at a single point but does not intersect it further, metaphorically illustrating the speech's departure from the main topic without reconnection. This underscores the abrupt and non-intersecting nature of the communicative divergence observed in affected individuals. It is frequently noted in clinical evaluations when patients respond to direct questions, highlighting its relevance in diagnostic interviews.

Key Characteristics

Tangential speech is characterized by a response that begins in a manner relevant to the original question or topic but then diverges into peripheral or irrelevant associations without ever returning to the central point. This primary trait results in a to address the query directly, often leaving the listener without resolution or closure on the intended subject. The underlying mechanism involves loose associations in the thought process, where connections between ideas are indirect, semantically distant, and non-goal-directed, leading to a drift away from the conversational aim. Observable signs include sentences that remain grammatically coherent and logically structured on their own, yet the overall discourse lacks thematic unity, with abrupt shifts to unrelated tangents lacking smooth transitions. These features can manifest as over-inclusion of extraneous details that seem loosely connected through thematic or associative links but ultimately derail the response. For instance, when asked, "What did you do today?", a person exhibiting tangential speech might respond by discussing the of clocks and their , vaguely linking it to the concept of time, without ever describing their personal activities. Such patterns are typically assessed during clinical interviews as part of evaluating thought form and content.

Differentiation from Similar Phenomena

Comparison with Circumstantiality

Tangential speech and circumstantiality are both forms of formal thought disorder characterized by deviations in speech patterns, but they differ fundamentally in their trajectory and resolution. In tangential speech, the speaker veers off into irrelevant detours that completely derail the conversation, never returning to the original topic or point, resulting in no resolution to the initial query. In contrast, circumstantiality involves overly inclusive narratives laden with excessive, often parenthetical details and tangential asides, yet the speaker eventually circles back to the relevant point after a delay. This core distinction—permanent derailment in tangentiality versus delayed but achieved relevance in circumstantiality—highlights how tangential speech manifests as a more fragmented and associative breakdown, while circumstantiality retains a looser but intact thread of connectivity. Clinically, distinguishing between these patterns is crucial, as misidentification can lead to inaccurate diagnostic assessments; tangential speech often signals more severe thought disorganization, potentially indicating greater impairment in psychotic or neurocognitive conditions compared to the relatively preserved goal-directedness in circumstantiality.

Comparison with Other Thought Disorders

Tangential speech is distinguished from , also known as loosening of associations, primarily by the nature of the thought progression. In tangential speech, the individual begins with a relevant response but gradually diverges through increasingly loose and irrelevant associations, ultimately failing to return to the original topic or answer the question posed. In contrast, involves abrupt, illogical interruptions where thoughts jump suddenly to unrelated or obliquely connected ideas, often resulting in fragmented and disconnected speech without any gradual buildup. This difference highlights tangential speech as a more meandering form of disorganization, while reflects a sharper break in logical flow, frequently observed in . Compared to flight of ideas, tangential speech lacks the accelerated, pressured quality typical of manic states. Flight of ideas manifests as a rapid succession of superficially related thoughts expressed in hurried speech with frequent, abrupt topic shifts, often driven by heightened arousal. Tangential speech, however, proceeds at a normal or slower pace with a wandering, digressive pattern that builds irrelevant details without the frantic connectivity or speed. This distinction underscores tangential speech's association with disorganized thinking rather than the goal-directed but overactive ideation in mood disorders. Tangential speech can be viewed as a subtype of loose associations, but it differs in the degree of thematic relevance. While loose associations feature thoughts that are entirely unrelated or minimally connected, leading to incoherent and disjointed discourse, tangential speech retains some superficial thematic links that veer off into irrelevance without resolving the core inquiry. In tangentiality, the progression starts logically but drifts via associative tangents, whereas pure loose associations exhibit no discernible logical thread from the outset. Within the spectrum of formal thought disorders, tangential speech occupies a moderate position, bridging milder forms like circumstantiality—where the topic is eventually reached—and more severe fragmented disorders such as incoherence or . This placement reflects its role in broader disorganized thinking patterns, often signaling underlying psychotic processes without the extreme disjunction seen in higher-severity variants.

Clinical Significance

Associated Conditions

Tangential speech is primarily associated with spectrum disorders, where it manifests as a key indicator of disorganized thinking and formal (FTD). In these conditions, formal thought disorders including tangential speech contribute to communication breakdowns and are observed in up to 50% of patients based on large-scale assessments using scales like the (PANSS). Among other psychiatric conditions, tangential speech appears in , particularly during manic phases, where it often accompanies pressured speech and flight of ideas, reflecting rapid and associative thought processes. It is also linked to , in which milder forms of FTD, including tangentiality, emerge as part of odd or vague speech patterns that impair social interactions. Additionally, it can occur in obsessive-compulsive disorder due to digressions related to obsessions, and in as part of grandiose or evasive communication styles. In neurological contexts, tangential speech is associated with , where seizures may disrupt thought organization, and neurodegenerative diseases such as , leading to impaired coherence. In neurodevelopmental contexts, tangential speech has been observed in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), where it may stem from challenges in sustaining focus and organizing thoughts during , though it is not a core symptom. Similarly, it is noted in autism spectrum disorder, often under stress, leading to disorganized or one-sided conversational patterns. For (TBI) affecting the frontal lobes, tangential speech arises from disruptions in like planning and inhibition, resulting in digressive and poorly structured narratives. Overall, while more characteristic of psychotic disorders, tangential speech in these conditions highlights underlying cognitive impairments.

Diagnosis and Assessment

The diagnosis of tangential speech primarily occurs through observation during psychiatric interviews, where clinicians employ open-ended questions to elicit spontaneous speech patterns and assess the patient's to maintain topic relevance. This approach allows for the passive evaluation of speech throughout the session, focusing on how responses deviate in real-time interactions. Key criteria for identifying tangential speech emphasize responses that are oblique, irrelevant, or distantly related to the probe without returning to the original topic, specifically in a stimulus-response mode such as immediate replies to interviewer questions. For instance, if asked about their hometown, a might shift to unrelated personal history without addressing the query directly. This pattern is often assessed in the context of conditions like , where it contributes to broader disorganized thinking. A standardized tool for assessment is the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication (TLC Scale), developed by Nancy Andreasen, which rates tangentiality on a 0-4 scale: 0 indicates no tangentiality, 1 mild (occurring once), 2 moderate (2-4 times), 3 severe (5-10 times), and 4 extreme (more than 10 times or rendering the interview incomprehensible). Ratings are derived from a structured 50-minute interview using predefined questions, with reported as good (weighted of 0.58). Challenges in include the inherent subjectivity of rating speech deviations, as judgments about can vary between clinicians despite standardized scales like the TLC. Additionally, multiple observations across sessions are often necessary to differentiate pathological tangentiality from normative cultural or stylistic variations in communication, such as indirect or elaborate narrative forms in certain backgrounds.

Management

Treatment Options

Treatment of tangential speech primarily targets the underlying conditions through a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing thought disorganization and improving communication coherence. Management strategies vary by the associated disorder, such as , , or .

Pharmacological Interventions

medications are commonly used to treat the underlying psychotic disorders associated with tangential speech, such as , by addressing positive symptoms including formal thought disorders. Second-generation antipsychotics, such as and , are frequently prescribed. While these medications can help manage psychotic symptoms, those with high D2 receptor occupancy, like , may worsen language disturbances such as reduced speech fluency. In contrast, and , with lower D2 occupancy, have a more favorable profile for minimizing adverse effects on . is reserved for treatment-resistant cases. Symptom improvement may occur within weeks to months, but side effects including sedation or can impact speech. For tangential speech in during manic or mixed episodes, mood stabilizers like or valproic acid, often combined with antipsychotics, are standard to control symptoms like flight of ideas and pressured speech that may manifest as tangentiality. In , antiseizure medications such as or target seizure control, which can reduce interictal language disturbances including tangential speech.

Psychotherapeutic Approaches

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) adapted for psychosis focuses on enhancing topic maintenance and structured thinking, helping individuals with tangential speech recognize and redirect off-topic digressions during conversations. Meta-analyses indicate that CBT, when added to antipsychotic treatment, yields small to medium effect sizes in reducing positive symptoms, including disorganized speech, with benefits persisting up to 18 months post-treatment. Speech-language therapy interventions, though less established, target communication skills by addressing pragmatic and discursive deficits, such as improving narrative coherence and turn-taking in dialogue. Emerging evidence supports integrating speech therapy to bolster verbal working memory and reduce tangential patterns linked to cognitive impairments.

Supportive Interventions

Social skills training (SST) programs teach practical strategies for maintaining conversational relevance, such as and summarizing key points, which directly counteract tangential tendencies in group or social settings. SST has demonstrated efficacy in improving for individuals with , leading to better social functioning and reduced isolation from speech-related challenges. These interventions are often delivered in group formats and combined with for optimal results. Studies on combined and CBT approaches report that approximately 40-50% of patients exhibit meaningful symptom reduction in , including improved speech patterns, highlighting the value of multimodal treatment.

and Outcomes

The prognosis for tangential speech, a form of formal , varies significantly depending on the underlying condition and timeliness of intervention. In neurodevelopmental disorders such as ADHD, early behavioral and speech therapy can lead to substantial improvements in speech and , often resulting in better long-term communication outcomes when initiated in childhood. In contrast, when associated with chronic psychotic disorders like , the prognosis is generally poorer, particularly without consistent treatment adherence, as negative forms of tend to persist beyond acute episodes. Key factors influencing outcomes include the severity of tangential speech at onset, presence of comorbidities such as executive function deficits, and individual response to pharmacological interventions. For instance, disorganized dimensions of formal in first-episode predict increased hospitalizations and reduced social functioning, with severity correlating to longer inpatient stays. In , approximately 40-60% of patients may achieve partial symptomatic remission with treatment, though negative thought disorders show lower response rates and higher persistence. Comorbid negative symptoms further exacerbate poor adherence and functional decline. Long-term effects of persistent tangential speech often include and impaired occupational functioning, as disrupted communication hinders interpersonal relationships and daily interactions. Untreated or severe cases are linked to higher relapse rates and diminished .

Historical Development

Early Descriptions

The concept of tangential speech traces its origins to 19th-century psychiatric observations of thought and language disruptions, particularly within the framework of emerging classifications of mental disorders. , in his seminal 1896 description of —a term he used for what would later be recognized as —identified disturbances in the form of thought, including "derailment," characterized by a deviation from logical sequences and an inability to maintain coherent associations. This early conceptualization positioned such derailments as core features of the illness, arising from underlying deterioration and manifesting in fragmented verbal expression. Building on Kraepelin's work, expanded these ideas in his 1911 monograph or the Group of Schizophrenias, introducing the term "loosening of associations" to describe a fundamental disruption in the connections between ideas, which often resulted in speech that veered without returning to the original point—phenomena akin to modern tangentiality. Bleuler viewed this as a primary symptom, rooted in an organic alteration of psychic functions, and emphasized its role in distinguishing from other psychoses. Prior to these formalizations, earlier psychiatrists noted similar patterns in manic states during asylum-based studies, though without the specific label of tangentiality. In the early , Jean-Étienne Dominique Esquirol documented manic states, while in the late , Kraepelin described "flight of ideas" in , where rapid shifts in thought led to digressive and incoherent discourse, observed among patients in institutional settings. These informal accounts highlighted excessive verbosity and tangential drifts as hallmarks of elevated mood episodes, often contrasting them with more structured delusions. These early descriptions emerged amid broader 19th-century investigations into and thought disturbances in asylums, where clinicians like and explored links between lesions and language impairments, influencing psychiatric views on deviant speech as symptomatic of deeper cognitive unraveling. Such observations laid the groundwork for later refinements in understanding tangential speech as a distinct formal .

Modern Conceptualization

In 1979, Nancy C. Andreasen formalized the concept of tangentiality within her pioneering work on thought, language, and communication disorders, defining it as a response to a question that is oblique or irrelevant, where the speaker digresses without directly addressing the query, though they may circle back in extended discourse. This definition was embedded in the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication (TLC), a structured tool designed to quantify formal thought disorders by rating speech samples on a 0-4 scale for severity, thereby enhancing inter-rater reliability from low levels (kappa <0.4) to moderate agreement (kappa >0.6) in clinical assessments. Post-1979 developments integrated tangential speech into standardized diagnostic frameworks, beginning with the DSM-III (1980), which categorized it under disorganized speech as an example of —loose associations leading to irrelevant shifts—essential for diagnosing and related disorders. Subsequent editions, including DSM-IV and DSM-5, retained and refined this, emphasizing tangentiality's role in indicating impaired thought organization. Concurrent research linked tangential speech to evidence of dysfunction, such as reduced prefrontal activation during tasks in patients, supporting models of executive control deficits in . As of 2022, the DSM-5-TR continues to position tangential speech within disorganized speech criteria for psychotic disorders, specifying it as indirect or off-topic replies that hinder communication coherence. This formalization has profoundly influenced research, enabling quantitative longitudinal studies that correlate tangentiality severity with executive function impairments, such as deficits in measured via tasks like the , and tying modern views back to Bleuler's early notions of associative disturbances.

References

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532945/
  2. https://dictionary.apa.org/tangential-speech
  3. https://dictionary.apa.org/tangentiality
  4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546682/
  5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546579/
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2757313/
  7. https://www.admsep.org/subpages/eresourcesrepository/modules/MSE/story_content/external_files/MSE%20Definitions.pdf
  8. https://cssh.northeastern.edu/cali/wp-content/uploads/sites/57/2022/09/Scale-for-the-assessment-of-thought-language-and-communication.pdf
  9. https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/what-is-circumstantial-thought-process
  10. https://medschool.co/signs/formal-thought-disorders
  11. https://dictionary.apa.org/derailment
  12. https://dictionary.apa.org/loosening-of-associations
  13. https://dictionary.apa.org/flight-of-ideas
  14. https://www.healthline.com/health/mental-health/flight-of-ideas
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/thought-disorder
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4466171/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6776521/
  18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2289947/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4818201/
  20. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/recognizing-and-treating-comorbid-psychiatric-disorders-people-autism
  21. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/57952
  22. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1941476-overview
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3764363/
  24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482311/
  25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7477551/
  26. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/319186
  27. https://academic.oup.com/schizbullopen/article/1/1/sgaa023/5840744
  28. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00287
  29. https://www.guilford.com/books/Social-Skills-Training-for-Schizophrenia/Mueser-Bellack-Gingerich-Agresta/9781462555031
  30. https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-018-1964-8
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6048761/
  32. https://www.casrf.org/post/adhd-and-speech-development-delay
  33. https://www.triumphtherapeutics.com/how-speech-therapy-can-help-children-with-adhd/
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9674097/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3181974/
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010440X16300803
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996422004248
  38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32520320/
  39. https://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Fulltext/2011/02000/Thought_Disorder_Severity_in_Compromised%2C.8.aspx
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3196952/
  41. https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/article-abstract/37/3/471/1893651
  42. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00572/full
  43. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/genealogy-of-the-clinical-syndrome-of-mania-signs-and-symptoms-described-in-psychiatric-texts-from-1880-to-1900/91DA305CB1DB842D9F97C9A74C27B8D2
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11445075/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.