Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Unitary divisor
Unitary divisor
Comunity Hub
History
arrow-down
starMore
arrow-down
bob

Bob

Have a question related to this hub?

bob

Alice

Got something to say related to this hub?
Share it here.

#general is a chat channel to discuss anything related to the hub.
Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Unitary divisor
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Unitary divisor Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Unitary divisor. The purpose of the hub is to connect p...
Add your contribution
Unitary divisor

In mathematics, a natural number a is a unitary divisor (or Hall divisor) of a number b if a is a divisor of b and if a and a / b are coprime, having no common factor other than 1. Equivalently, a divisor a of b is a unitary divisor if and only if every prime factor of a has the same multiplicity in a as it has in b.

The concept of a unitary divisor originates from R. Vaidyanathaswamy (1931),[1] who used the term block divisor.

Example

[edit]

The integer 5 is a unitary divisor of 60, because 5 and have only 1 as a common factor.

On the contrary, 6 is a divisor but not a unitary divisor of 60, as 6 and have a common factor other than 1, namely 2.

Sum of unitary divisors

[edit]

The sum-of-unitary-divisors function is denoted by the lowercase Greek letter sigma thus: . The sum of the k-th powers of the unitary divisors is denoted by :

It is a multiplicative function. If the proper unitary divisors of a given number add up to that number, then that number is called a unitary perfect number.

Properties

[edit]

Number 1 is a unitary divisor of every natural number.

The number of unitary divisors of a number n is 2k, where k is the number of distinct prime factors of n. This is because each integer N > 1 is the product of positive powers of distinct prime numbers p. Thus every unitary divisor of N is the product, over a given subset S of the prime divisors {p} of , of the prime powers for pS. If there are k prime factors, then there are exactly 2k subsets S, and the statement follows.

The sum of the unitary divisors of n is odd if n is a power of 2 (including 1), and even otherwise.

Both the count and the sum of the unitary divisors of n are multiplicative functions of n that are not completely multiplicative. The Dirichlet generating function is

Every divisor of n is unitary if and only if n is square-free.

The set of all unitary divisors of n forms a Boolean algebra with meet given by the greatest common divisor and join by the least common multiple. Equivalently, the set of unitary divisors of n forms a Boolean ring, where the addition and multiplication are given by

where denotes the greatest common divisor of a and b. [2]

Odd unitary divisors

[edit]

The sum of the k-th powers of the odd unitary divisors is

It is also multiplicative, with Dirichlet generating function

Bi-unitary divisors

[edit]

A divisor d of n is a bi-unitary divisor if the greatest common unitary divisor of d and n / d is 1. This concept originates from D. Suryanarayana (1972). [The number of bi-unitary divisors of an integer, in The Theory of Arithmetic Functions, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 251: 273–282, New York, Springer–Verlag].

The number of bi-unitary divisors of n is a multiplicative function of n with average order where[3]

A bi-unitary perfect number is one equal to the sum of its bi-unitary aliquot divisors. The only such numbers are 6, 60 and 90.[4]

OEIS sequences

[edit]
  • OEISA034444 is
  • OEISA034448 is
  • OEISA034676 to OEISA034682 are to
  • OEISA034444 is , the number of unitary divisors
  • OEISA068068 is
  • OEISA192066 is
  • OEISA064609 is
  • OEISA306071 is the constant A

References

[edit]
  1. ^ R. Vaidyanathaswamy (1931). "The theory of multiplicative arithmetic functions". Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 33 (2): 579–662. doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1931-1501607-1.
  2. ^ Conway, J.H.; Norton, S.P. (1979). "Monstrous Moonshine". Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society. 11 (3): 308–339.
  3. ^ Ivić (1985) p.395
  4. ^ Sandor et al (2006) p.115
[edit]