Hubbry Logo
V429 GeminorumV429 GeminorumMain
Open search
V429 Geminorum
Community hub
V429 Geminorum
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
V429 Geminorum
from Wikipedia
BD+20° 1790

A light curve for V429 Geminorum, adapted from Norton et al. (2007)[1]
Observation data
Epoch J2000.0      Equinox J2000.0
Constellation Gemini
Right ascension 07h 23m 43.58935s[2]
Declination +20° 24′ 58.6506″[2]
Apparent magnitude (V) 9.86 - 10.080[3]
Characteristics
Spectral type K5Ve[4]
Variable type BY Dra[3]
Astrometry
Radial velocity (Rv)7.56±0.28[2] km/s
Proper motion (μ) RA: −65.642 mas/yr[2]
Dec.: −230.692 mas/yr[2]
Parallax (π)36.0856±0.0186 mas[2]
Distance90.38 ± 0.05 ly
(27.71 ± 0.01 pc)
Details
Mass0.63[5] M
Radius0.71[5] R
Luminosity0.17[5] L
Surface gravity (log g)4.53[5] cgs
Temperature4410[5] K
Metallicity0.30[5]
Rotation2.76±0.04 d[6]
Rotational velocity (v sin i)10.03[5] km/s
Age35-80[5][7] Myr
Other designations
V429 Gem, BD+20°1790, TYC 1355-214-1, USNO-B1.0 1104-00142035, 2MASS J07234358+2024588, 1SWASP J072343.59+202458.6
Database references
SIMBADdata

V429 Geminorum (BD+20°1790) is a young orange dwarf star in the constellation Gemini, located 90 light years away from the Sun. It is a BY Draconis variable, a cool dwarf which varies rapidly in brightness as it rotates.

Description

[edit]

The star is young and very active and is a member of the AB Doradus Moving Group.[8] The star has also been studied and monitored by SuperWASP group and found to coincide with the ROSAT source 1RXS J072343.6+202500.[1] The planet candidate was announced in December 2009.[5]

Disproven planet

[edit]

The Keplerian fit of the radial velocity data suggested an orbital solution for a close-in massive planet with an orbital period of 7.7834 days. Moreover, the presence of a close-in massive jovian planet could explain the high level of stellar activity detected.[5] However, further study suggests that this planet does not exist because the radial velocity variations are strongly correlated to stellar activity, suggesting this activity is the cause of the variations.[9][6] This echoes the similar case of the disproven planet detection around TW Hydrae, which was also found to be due to stellar activity rather than orbital motion.[10]

References

[edit]

See also

[edit]


Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.