Hubbry Logo
Intravaginal administrationIntravaginal administrationMain
Open search
Intravaginal administration
Community hub
Intravaginal administration
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Intravaginal administration
Intravaginal administration
Intravaginal administration
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Administering a vaginal cream using an applicator.
Administering a vaginal tablet without an applicator.

Intravaginal administration is a route of administration where the substance is applied inside the vagina. Pharmacologically, it has the potential advantage to result in effects primarily in the vagina or nearby structures (such as the vaginal portion of cervix) with limited systemic adverse effects compared to other routes of administration.[1][2][3]

Formulation methods include vaginal tablets, vaginal cream, vaginal gel,[4][medical citation needed] vaginal suppository and vaginal ring.

It is used as an administration method for issues related to women's health, such as contraception.[5] Medicines primarily delivered by intravaginal administration include vaginally administered estrogens and progestogens (a group of hormones including progesterone), and antibacterials and antifungals to treat bacterial vaginosis and yeast infections respectively.

Medicines may also be administered intravaginally as an alternative to oral route in the case of nausea or other digestive problems.[5]

It is a potential means of artificial insemination (referred to as intravaginal insemination or IVI), sometimes used at home without the presence of a professional.[6]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Intravaginal administration

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Intravaginal administration is a route of whereby medications or therapeutic agents are applied directly into the , often via applicators, inserts, or devices, to provide localized treatment for vaginal conditions or facilitate systemic absorption into the bloodstream. This method leverages the vagina's extensive vascular network and permeable epithelial lining for efficient uptake, enabling both at the site of action and broader physiological effects. One of the primary advantages of is the avoidance of hepatic first-pass , which allows for higher and the use of lower drug doses compared to oral routes, thereby minimizing systemic side effects. Additionally, it circumvents gastrointestinal disturbances and offers the potential for sustained release, leading to steady drug levels over extended periods, such as weeks or months with intravaginal rings. The route is particularly suitable for self-administration in private settings, enhancing patient compliance, especially for conditions affecting women's reproductive health. Common therapeutic applications include local management of infections like , , and sexually transmitted infections, as well as systemic uses such as , postmenopausal estrogen replacement, and with agents like prostaglandins or . For instance, products like the NuvaRing provide continuous release of and ethinyl for contraception, while Estring delivers for vaginal atrophy relief. Emerging applications also explore its potential in /STI prevention and targeted uterine delivery via the "first uterine pass effect." Dosage forms for intravaginal administration are diverse, including suppositories (also known as pessaries), gels, creams, tablets, foams, and advanced systems like bioadhesive polymers or intravaginal rings, which enhance retention and controlled release despite challenges such as vaginal barriers and variations. These formulations are designed to optimize and absorption, making the route effective for both acute and chronic therapies.

Overview

Definition and Mechanism

Intravaginal administration is a route of in which medications are applied directly into the to achieve either local therapeutic effects within the vaginal tissues or systemic effects through absorption into the bloodstream. This method leverages the vagina's anatomical features to facilitate drug release and uptake, offering advantages such as avoidance of gastrointestinal degradation and hepatic first-pass . The basic mechanism involves the release of the active pharmaceutical ingredient from the into the vaginal lumen, where it contacts the epithelial lining and diffuses across the vaginal mucosa. Absorption occurs primarily through passive , driven by the mucosa's thin and permeable structure, as well as its extensive vascular and lymphatic networks that transport the to the systemic circulation. The process is influenced by the drug's physicochemical properties, such as and molecular weight, which determine the rate of through the epithelial barrier. The supports this route due to its stratified squamous non-keratinized , which consists of multiple layers (typically 15-25 cells thick, measuring 200-400 µm) and provides a relatively permeable barrier under influence. The vaginal environment maintains an acidic of 3.8-4.5 in reproductive-age women, primarily through production by lactobacilli, which aids in stability and microbial defense but can affect the of certain formulations. The mucosal surface area in adults averages approximately 90 cm², enhanced by folds that increase contact opportunities for . Suitable drug types for intravaginal administration include hormones such as estrogens and progestogens for contraception or menopausal therapy, antimicrobials for treating infections like , and other agents like for , selected based on their compatibility with the vaginal milieu for effective local or systemic delivery.

Historical Development

The use of intravaginal administration dates back to ancient civilizations, where vaginal suppositories and inserts were employed for treating gynecological conditions, including infections. In , as documented in medical papyri such as the from around 1550 BCE, remedies involving honey mixed with natron or other natural substances were inserted vaginally to address vaginal discharges and infections, though these practices were not systematically recorded or scientifically validated. Similar herbal inserts and douches appear in texts for managing uterine and vaginal ailments, reflecting early recognition of the vagina's accessibility for local therapeutic delivery. The modern scientific foundation of intravaginal drug administration emerged in the early with experimental studies on systemic absorption. In 1918, pharmacologist David I. Macht published seminal research demonstrating the vaginal route's absorptive capacity, showing that drugs such as , atropine, and could be absorbed through the vaginal mucosa in animal models, marking the first systematic exploration of this pathway. This work shifted perceptions from purely local applications to potential systemic delivery, laying groundwork for pharmaceutical development despite limited clinical adoption at the time. During the and , intravaginal administration gained prominence in contraceptive development, with the introduction of spermicidal foams and gels as non-hormonal options for local action. Products like Emko foam, formulated with , became widely available and popular as user-controlled vaginal contraceptives, reflecting a surge in reproductive health innovations amid the . By the 1980s, vaginal progesterone suppositories were introduced for support, particularly in supplementation, as studies confirmed their efficacy in achieving therapeutic progesterone levels via vaginal absorption, avoiding first-pass metabolism. The late 20th century saw a transition to advanced controlled-release systems, enhancing the route's reliability for sustained drug delivery. Early intravaginal rings emerged in the 1970s for hormonal contraception, evolving from simple topical forms to polymer-based devices that provided steady release over weeks. This culminated in 2001 with the FDA approval of NuvaRing, the first combined hormonal intravaginal ring, which delivered etonogestrel and ethinyl estradiol continuously for 21 days, representing a high-impact milestone in long-acting vaginal therapeutics.

Methods of Administration

Dosage Forms

Intravaginal encompass a range of pharmaceutical formulations engineered for effective delivery within the vaginal environment, including solids, semisolids, devices, and advanced nanotechnology-based systems like nanoparticles and liposomes that facilitate local or sustained release. These forms are selected based on their ability to adapt to the vaginal mucosa's physiological conditions, ensuring optimal dispersion and retention. Common forms include suppositories, which are solid dosage units that melt or dissolve at body temperature to release the . Creams and gels represent semisolid preparations designed for easy spreading along the vaginal walls. Tablets are compact, dissolvable solids that provide controlled local release upon insertion. Foams and aerosols offer expanding formulations for broad coverage of the vaginal surface. Films and strips consist of thin, dissolvable layers that adhere briefly to the mucosa. Vaginal rings are flexible, sustained-release devices inserted for extended periods. Examples of these forms include clindamycin ovules as suppositories, as tablets, and vaginal rings such as Estring () and NuvaRing ( and ethinyl estradiol). Design considerations for these formulations emphasize mucoadhesive properties to extend contact time with the , often achieved through polymers such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) or . Compatibility with the vaginal , typically ranging from 3.8 to 4.5, is ensured via buffering agents or pH-responsive materials to prevent or instability. Controlled-release mechanisms, such as polymer matrices in rings that allow for up to 21 days of wear, are incorporated to maintain steady drug levels. Formulation challenges include maintaining stability in the humid vaginal milieu, where can degrade structures or active ingredients, necessitating protective coatings or moisture-resistant excipients. Ease of is another key concern, with designs prioritizing user-friendly shapes and applicators to enhance compliance without requiring professional assistance.

Application Procedures

Proper is essential before intravaginal administration to prevent ; hands should be washed thoroughly with and water, and the vaginal area gently cleaned with mild and water if needed, then patted dry. Patients can choose a comfortable position for insertion, such as lying on the back with knees bent and drawn toward the chest, , or standing with one foot elevated on a low stool or chair to facilitate access to the vaginal opening. The medication is typically inserted using a clean finger or a provided applicator, aiming to place it high into the along the posterior wall toward the posterior fornix for optimal retention and dissolution. After insertion, remaining in a for 10-15 minutes allows the medication to begin dissolving and reduces leakage. Procedures vary by dosage form to ensure effective delivery. For suppositories or tablets, the medication is unwrapped and, if soft, may be moistened with water or briefly refrigerated to firm it up before insertion; using fingers, it is gently pushed 1-2 inches (2.5-5 cm) into the vagina, or an applicator is used by placing the medication in the tip, inserting the applicator, and depressing the plunger to release it deep inside. For creams, a pre-filled or disposable applicator is attached to the tube, filled to the marked dose (typically 4-5 grams), inserted into the vagina while lying down, and the plunger pushed to dispense the cream before withdrawing and discarding or cleaning the applicator with soap and warm water. Vaginal rings are folded between the thumb and index finger like a tampon, then gently inserted deep into the vagina using the finger, without needing precise placement as the ring will settle comfortably. Patients should follow timing instructions to maximize efficacy, such as administering at to leverage and minimize leakage while sleeping. Duration varies by product; for example, contraceptive rings like NuvaRing are typically worn continuously for 3 weeks before removal for a 1-week break to allow . Storage guidelines depend on the formulation, with most creams and suppositories kept at in a tightly closed away from heat, moisture, and light, though some suppositories require to preserve firmness until use. Safety considerations include using sanitary pads instead of tampons during treatment to avoid interference with absorption, and treatment can generally continue during as directed, though patients should monitor for any changes in efficacy. For used devices like applicators, they should be cleaned if reusable or disposed of in the trash if single-use; rings, once removed, are wrapped in tissue and discarded properly without flushing.

Pharmacology

Absorption and Distribution

Intravaginal drug absorption primarily occurs through passive diffusion across the into the underlying subepithelial capillaries. The vaginal mucosa, consisting of , allows drugs to permeate via transcellular or paracellular routes, with passive diffusion recognized as the dominant mechanism due to the limited expression of transporters and enzymes compared to other mucosal sites. This process is facilitated by the vagina's rich vascular network, supplied by branches of the pelvic arteries such as the vaginal and uterine arteries from the , which provide high blood flow to support rapid uptake. Lymphatic drainage also contributes to absorption, particularly for larger molecules, by transporting drugs from the interstitial spaces into the systemic circulation. Once absorbed, drugs enter the pelvic venous plexus surrounding the , enabling rapid distribution into the systemic circulation via the internal iliac veins and, to a lesser extent, the hemorrhoidal veins, thereby bypassing hepatic first-pass . This venous drainage pattern results in preferential local distribution to adjacent pelvic organs, including the , ovaries, and lower , through mechanisms that allow direct transfer before widespread dissemination. Studies using radiolabeled tracers in postmenopausal women have demonstrated uterine accumulation peaking 2-3.5 hours post-administration, even when cervical passage is blocked, confirming absorption-mediated transport over simple intracavitary . Several physiological factors influence the rate and extent of intravaginal absorption and subsequent distribution. The is thicker in premenopausal women (approximately 0.3-0.5 mm), particularly during estrogen-dominant phases of the , which, combined with increased vascularization and content, enhances permeability compared to the atrophic, thinner (approximately 0.1-0.2 mm) in postmenopausal women. The vaginal surface area, averaging around 87 cm², provides ample contact for drug dissolution and uptake, while drug plays a key role, with non-ionized, lipophilic forms favored at the vagina's acidic (3.5-5.0), promoting transcellular diffusion. For instance, intravaginal progesterone exemplifies targeted distribution, achieving endometrial concentrations over 10-fold higher than serum levels due to the first uterine pass effect, allowing selective uterine exposure prior to systemic spread.

Bioavailability and Factors Affecting It

in the context of intravaginal administration refers to the fraction of the administered drug dose that reaches the systemic circulation unchanged. For many drugs delivered intravaginally, this typically ranges from 10% to 30%, as exemplified by clindamycin phosphate ovules, which achieve an average systemic absorption of 30%. This route often provides higher for certain compounds compared to due to the avoidance of first-pass in the liver. The vaginal venous drainage primarily directs absorbed drugs into the systemic circulation via the internal iliac veins, bypassing initial hepatic , which is particularly advantageous for steroids such as progesterone. Intravaginal progesterone formulations can attain levels of up to 80-90%, significantly higher than the lower systemic exposure seen with oral dosing due to extensive hepatic presystemic elimination. Several factors influence the of intravaginally administered drugs, categorized into physiological, pathological, and formulation-related variables. Physiologically, the phase modulates absorption, with higher rates during the due to thinner and increased vascularization, while enhances uptake through heightened vaginal blood flow and mucosal vascularization. In contrast, age-related postmenopausal vaginal can decrease bioavailability by altering mucosal integrity and , though initial absorption may be elevated in untreated atrophic states before epithelial thickening occurs with . Pathologically, conditions like vaginal infections disrupt the normal acidic (around 4-5), shifting it toward neutrality and impairing drug and , thereby reducing absorption; bacterial , for instance, is associated with elevated pH and altered that hinder drug retention. Formulation factors, such as the incorporation of mucoadhesive polymers (e.g., carbopol or ), significantly enhance bioavailability by prolonging contact time with the vaginal mucosa and resisting expulsion, leading to improved drug release and uptake compared to non-adhesive gels. Bioavailability exhibits considerable variability influenced by daily physiological changes. During menses, increased vaginal fluid volume dilutes the drug formulation, reducing contact time and absorption efficiency for water-soluble compounds. Conversely, physical activity like exercise can transiently boost bioavailability by elevating pelvic blood flow, facilitating faster trans-mucosal transport, though this effect is short-lived and drug-specific. These modulators underscore the importance of timing and patient-specific considerations in optimizing intravaginal drug delivery.

Clinical Applications

Local Treatments

Intravaginal administration is widely employed for treating vaginal infections, where agents like miconazole target infections caused by Candida species, delivering high local concentrations to the vaginal mucosa. A single-dose miconazole nitrate vaginal has demonstrated efficacy comparable to a 7-day cream regimen in curing uncomplicated vulvovaginal , with rapid symptom relief and mycologic cure rates of 62% to 72%. Similarly, antibiotics such as gel address by eradicating anaerobic bacteria and restoring , achieving clinical cure rates of 87% to 91% in controlled trials. Beyond infections, intravaginal low-dose creams treat in postmenopausal women by alleviating symptoms like dryness and through epithelial restoration, with daily or twice-weekly regimens showing equivalent effectiveness and endometrial safety. suppositories serve as an adjunct for recurrent vaginal infections, particularly those resistant to conventional antifungals, yielding mycologic cure rates from 40% to 100% across case series. Emerging therapies include multi-strain Lactobacillus crispatus synbiotics to restore in recurrent infections and intravaginal cooling devices for symptom relief in vulvovaginal , as of 2025. The targeted nature of intravaginal delivery enhances efficacy for these local conditions by concentrating therapeutic agents at the infection site, thereby minimizing systemic absorption and associated side effects, such as gastrointestinal disturbances from oral . For example, clotrimazole vaginal tablets treat vulvovaginal with clinical cure rates of approximately 88% to 90% at follow-up, outperforming while avoiding broader exposure.

Systemic Therapies

Intravaginal administration enables systemic therapeutic effects by facilitating absorption of active agents into the bloodstream, particularly for applications where steady delivery is beneficial. This route is utilized for contraception, , and other interventions like , offering controlled release that bypasses hepatic first-pass metabolism. In contraception, hormonal s deliver progestin and combinations to suppress and alter cervical mucus. The etonogestrel/ (NuvaRing) releases 120 μg and 15 μg ethinylestradiol daily, inhibiting secretion and preventing follicular development in most cycles, achieving high with a of 1.28 (pooled; 95% CI 0.8-1.9) to 2.02 ( study; 95% CI 1.1-3.4) in clinical use. For , intravaginal rings address menopausal symptoms through systemic delivery. The Estring ( vaginal ring) releases 7.5 μg per day, reducing incidence by approximately 80% and improving mood and vaginal conditions over three months of continuous use. Progesterone suppositories provide support in assisted reproductive technologies, such as fertilization (IVF), by maintaining endometrial receptivity for implantation; supplementation enhances rates by supporting progesterone levels post-ovulation induction. Other systemic applications include with intravaginal , a analog that promotes cervical ripening and . Standard dosing is 25-50 μg every 4-6 hours, up to four doses, which is more effective than for achieving within 24 hours while minimizing hyperstimulation risks. Antiretroviral microbicides, such as the FDA-approved dapivirine (as of 2025), release 25 mg of the non-nucleoside over 28 days to prevent acquisition through local and partial systemic action, demonstrating 27-31% risk reduction in phase III trials among women. Advantages of intravaginal systemic delivery include sustained levels without daily dosing, as seen with rings providing consistent over weeks, and reduced overall exposure compared to oral routes due to avoidance of first-pass effects, potentially lowering incidence.

Advantages and Limitations

Benefits

Intravaginal administration offers significant pharmacological benefits, primarily by bypassing the hepatic first-pass , which allows for higher and the use of lower doses to achieve systemic therapeutic effects compared to oral routes. This route also enables the delivery of high local concentrations of drugs directly to the vaginal mucosa, providing targeted treatment for conditions affecting the vaginal area, such as infections or . From a practical standpoint, intravaginal facilitates self-administration by patients, often requiring only a single application for extended periods, which enhances convenience and discretion in use. Sustained-release formulations, such as intravaginal rings, can maintain consistent drug levels over durations like 21 days, minimizing the need for frequent dosing and thereby reducing gastrointestinal side effects associated with oral medications. For specific patient populations, this administration method improves treatment compliance in hormone therapies by decreasing daily interruptions and promoting steady hormone delivery, which is particularly beneficial for postmenopausal . It also provides targeted relief from symptoms like in through localized application, alleviating vaginal dryness and discomfort with minimal systemic exposure. On a broader scale, intravaginal administration holds potential for advancing initiatives, including the delivery of microbicides to prevent transmission and the exploration of vaccines for mucosal immunization, empowering self-managed preventive strategies, with the dapivirine approved for use in several sub-Saharan African countries since 2021 and ongoing global access efforts as of 2025.

Risks and Side Effects

Intravaginal administration of medications can result in local side effects such as vaginal , burning, itching, and increased discharge, which are commonly reported with formulations like creams, gels, and suppositories. Allergic reactions may occur due to preservatives or other excipients in vaginal creams, leading to characterized by redness, swelling, or rash in sensitive individuals. Poor during application, such as inadequate handwashing or improper insertion techniques, heightens the risk of introducing pathogens and subsequent vaginal infections, including or . Systemic risks are generally minimal due to low absorption, but unlike oral s, low-dose vaginal products, including rings, do not appear to increase the risk of , even in women with predisposing factors. Variable absorption may lead to inconsistent therapeutic effects, potentially requiring dosage adjustments. Patient-related factors can exacerbate risks, including discomfort or during insertion, especially with applicators or in cases of vaginal dryness, and messiness from leaking creams that may reduce user compliance. In postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy, mucosal thinning may further diminish efficacy by impairing drug contact and absorption, while contraindications include active , which could worsen or mask underlying conditions. Specific examples illustrate these risks: vaginal gel often causes a metallic in the , affecting about 10% of users due to systemic absorption despite local application. Vaginal rings, such as those releasing , experience expulsion in 2-7% of cases, typically linked to bowel movements or straining, potentially interrupting therapy.

Comparison with Other Routes

Versus Oral Administration

Intravaginal administration offers distinct pharmacokinetic advantages over , primarily by bypassing the hepatic first-pass that significantly reduces drug in the oral route. For instance, progesterone administered intravaginally achieves substantially higher systemic compared to the low (typically <10%) seen with oral dosing, due to direct absorption through the vaginal mucosa into the systemic circulation. This avoidance of first-pass effect allows for lower doses to reach therapeutic levels, as evidenced in support where intravaginal progesterone at 100-200 mg daily maintains effective plasma concentrations, whereas typically requires 400-600 mg to compensate for metabolic losses. However, the is generally slower with intravaginal delivery (typically 4-8 hours to peak plasma levels) than oral (1-3 hours), making it less suitable for acute needs. In terms of suitability, intravaginal administration is particularly advantageous for labile compounds such as peptides and proteins, which are prone to enzymatic degradation in the and extensive hepatic following oral intake. The vaginal route provides a more stable environment with higher and reduced activity, enabling better systemic delivery of these macromolecules without the need for protective formulations required for oral peptides. Conversely, remains preferred for many non-reproductive drugs due to its greater patient convenience, non-invasiveness, and ease of self-administration outside of reproductive contexts. Regarding side effect profiles, generally avoids gastrointestinal disturbances common with oral routes, such as , , and , which are common with high-dose oral progesterone. Instead, it may introduce local vaginal , discharge, or discomfort, effects absent in oral . Overall, these differences make a targeted option for reproductive therapies, balancing with a shifted risk profile compared to the broader tolerability of oral dosing.

Versus Other Mucosal Routes

Intravaginal administration differs from other mucosal routes, such as rectal and nasal, primarily due to distinct anatomical and physiological features that influence drug absorption. The vaginal mucosa provides a larger surface area—approximately 200 cm²—with a highly vascularized, that is about 2 mm thick and maintains an acidic of 3.5–4.5, influenced by lactobacilli, which facilitates pH-specific absorption of certain drugs while avoiding first-pass hepatic metabolism entirely through drainage via the . In contrast, the rectal route features a smaller effective surface area of 200–400 cm², a neutral around 7.5, and thicker (up to 150 μm), with venous drainage partially bypassing the liver (via inferior and middle rectal veins) but still subject to some first-pass effect through the superior rectal vein, leading to variable and often slower absorption. The nasal mucosa, with a surface area of about 130–160 cm² and thinner (~60 μm), offers rapid absorption due to its rich vascularization and neutral to slightly acidic (5.0–7.8), but is limited by quick and a small fluid volume capacity of around 0.1–0.15 per . Application methods and patient acceptance also vary significantly among these routes, affecting their practicality. Intravaginal delivery often involves self-insertion of discreet devices like rings or gels, which can be intimate and culturally sensitive, potentially leading to lower acceptance due to hygiene concerns or discomfort, though it allows for sustained release over days or weeks. Rectal administration, typically via suppositories or enemas, shares similar ease of self-application but faces greater stigma and aversion related to privacy and messiness, resulting in erratic compliance despite its utility in non-oral scenarios. Nasal delivery, using non-invasive sprays or powders, is generally more acceptable and user-friendly for rapid self-administration, minimizing intimacy issues, but it is prone to local irritation, taste disturbances, and anatomical variations that can reduce efficacy. Therapeutically, intravaginal administration excels in gynecological applications, providing targeted local effects for infections or hormonal therapies, as well as systemic delivery for conditions like contraception, exemplified by progesterone-releasing vaginal rings that achieve steady hormone levels over extended periods. The rectal route is preferred for emergency or short-term systemic relief in scenarios like nausea or seizures, such as with diazepam rectal gel for rapid anticonvulsant action in unconscious patients, leveraging its partial avoidance of first-pass metabolism. Nasal administration is ideal for quick-onset needs, including migraines or vaccines, with examples like sumatriptan nasal spray enabling brain-targeted delivery via olfactory pathways for faster therapeutic effects compared to the more sustained profiles of vaginal or rectal routes.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/intravaginal-administration
  2. https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282%252804%252900509-6/fulltext
  3. https://www.primescholars.com/articles/intra-vaginal-drug-delivery-systeman-overview.pdf
  4. https://accesspharmacy.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=3459&sectionid=285256969
  5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.025
  6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2015.04.017
  7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000070184
  8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235269/
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319562X21005027
  10. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rmib/v44n2/2395-9126-rmib-44-02-1347.pdf
  11. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/2613/9611/6275/History_of_BC_Methods.pdf
  12. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.12770
  13. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-1369-9395.pdf
  14. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2001/21-187_NuvaRing.cfm
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8232205/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2976928/
  17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.019
  18. https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/terconazole-vaginal-route/proper-use/drg-20061411
  19. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/drugs/suppositories
  20. https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a682753.html
  21. https://www.healthline.com/health/general-use/how-to-use-vaginal-suppositories
  22. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/birth-control-vaginal-ring-nuvaring/how-do-i-use-nuvaring
  23. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/drugs/19592-terconazole-vaginal-suppositories
  24. https://www.safemedication.com/how-to-use-medication/vaginal-tablets-suppositories-and-creams
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3513450/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4142075/
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359644624001375
  28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11730735/
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9194669/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8745980/
  31. https://basicmedicalkey.com/vaginal-mucosa-and-drug-delivery/
  32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9329850/
  33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10434232/
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6301793/
  35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10689005/
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15763615/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6732017/
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5404400/
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6571606/
  40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40569139/
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10868615/
  42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8497364/
  43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19436223/
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21774671/
  45. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41522-025-00788-6
  46. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/231/4/e813/7953302
  47. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18775597/
  48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27073145/
  49. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/021187s022lbl.pdf
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10601920/
  51. https://www.reproductivefacts.org/news-and-publications/fact-sheets-and-infographics/progesterone-supplementation-during-ivf/
  52. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2006/0201/p511.html
  53. https://www.prepwatch.org/products/dapivirine-vaginal-ring/
  54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15236978/
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028204005096
  56. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK568677/
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8277443/
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3252029/
  59. https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/hiv-prevention/potential-future-options/microbicides
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5479294/
  61. https://www.fredhutch.org/en/research/divisions/vaccine-infectious-disease-division/research/immunology-and-vaccine-development/be-the-generation/microbicides.html
  62. https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/estradiol-vaginal-route/description/drg-20075648
  63. https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/clindamycin-vaginal-route/description/drg-20063118
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4857673/
  65. https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5786/1/4/19
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000733
  67. https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/candidiasis.htm
  68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39113588/
  69. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2013/04/postmenopausal-estrogen-therapy-route-of-administration-and-risk-of-venous-thromboembolism
  70. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/drugs/19770-estradiol-vaginal-cream
  71. https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/terconazole-vaginal-route/description/drg-20061411
  72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39315501/
  73. https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/metronidazole-vaginal-route/description/drg-20064738
  74. https://www.drugs.com/medical-answers/flagyl-metallic-taste-3573655/
  75. https://www.rxlist.com/estring-drug.htm
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10350750/
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028299005531
  78. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2017.00212/full
  79. https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/38/Supplement_2/ii24/7425376
  80. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1743318/
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365904006297
  82. https://www.jiac-j.com/article/S1341-321X%2825%2900223-5/abstract
  83. https://clinicalgate.com/rectal-and-vaginal-drug-delivery/
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7603972/
  85. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17425247.2025.2470224
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.