Hubbry Logo
Self-insertionSelf-insertionMain
Open search
Self-insertion
Community hub
Self-insertion
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Self-insertion
Self-insertion
Self-insertion
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Sandro Botticelli's painting of the Adoration of the Magi has an inserted self-portrait at the far right: the position in the corner and the gaze out to the viewer are very typical of such self-portraits.

Self-insertion is a literary device in which the author writes themselves into the story under the guise of, or from the perspective of, a fictional character (see author surrogate).[1] The character, overtly or otherwise, behaves like, has the personality of, and may even be described as physically resembling the author or reader of the work.

In visual art, the equivalent of self-insertion is the inserted self-portrait, where the artist includes a self-portrait in a painting of a narrative subject. This has been a common artistic device since at least the European Renaissance.

Among professional writers, the intentional, deliberate use of first-person and third-person self-insertion techniques are commonly considered to be an unoriginal action on the author's part, and represents a paucity of creative thought in their writing.[2][3]

Literary forms

[edit]

Similar literary devices include the author doubling as the first-person narrator, or writing an author surrogate in the third-person, or adding in a character who is partially based on the author, whether the author included it intentionally or not. Many characters have been described as unintentional self-insertions, implying that their author is unconsciously using them as an author surrogate.[4]

Self-insertion can also be employed in a second-person narrative, utilizing the imagination of the reader and their suspension of disbelief. The reader, referred to in the second person, is depicted as interacting with another character, with the intent to encourage the reader's immersion and psychological projection of themselves into the story, imaging that they, themselves, are performing the written story.[5] While examples in published fiction of second-person self-insertion are rare, the use of such is common in fan fiction, in which the reader is paired with a fictional character, often in an intimate setting.

Examples

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Self-insertion

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Self-insertion is a literary device in wherein an author incorporates a fictionalized version of themselves—often under their own name or as a thinly veiled —into the story as a character, typically to explore personal themes, blend with , or engage in metafictional commentary. This technique allows writers to interrogate their own identity, experiences, and relationship to the process, blurring the boundaries between creator and creation. The practice dates back to medieval literature, with early prominent examples including Geoffrey Chaucer's appearance as a pilgrim and narrator in The Canterbury Tales (c. 1387–1400), where he positions himself humbly among the storytellers to frame the collection of tales and subtly influence the satire on society. Similarly, Dante Alighieri inserts a version of himself as the protagonist in The Divine Comedy (c. 1308–1321), embarking on a guided journey through Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven to reflect on sin, redemption, and divine order, making the epic a profound personal allegory. In the 20th century, self-insertion evolved within modernist and postmodernist traditions, as seen in Kurt Vonnegut's role as a character in Slaughterhouse-Five (1969), where he draws on his World War II experiences to critique war and time, inserting himself to underscore the novel's metafictional structure and anti-war message. Beyond canonical literature, self-insertion remains prevalent in contemporary fiction and fan works, often serving therapeutic or escapist purposes, though it can raise ethical questions about authorial ego and narrative authenticity. Notable modern instances include Stephen King's portrayal of himself as a character opposing supernatural forces in Song of Susannah (2004), part of The Dark Tower series, and C.S. Lewis's brief appearance as a character at the conclusion, where he listens to the protagonist's account, in Out of the Silent Planet (1938). This device continues to highlight tensions between objectivity and subjectivity in storytelling, influencing genres from science fiction to autofiction.

Fundamentals

Definition

Self-insertion is a literary device in which an author incorporates themselves, or a thinly veiled representation thereof, into their fictional as a character, typically to shape the plot, offer commentary, or disrupt narrative conventions such as the . This practice allows the creator to embed personal perspectives or experiences directly within the story, often serving purposes like wish-fulfillment or meta- exploration. Key characteristics of self-insertion include the deliberate blurring of boundaries between the creator and the created work, where the inserted character may share the author's traits, , or viewpoints to varying degrees. It can manifest overtly, such as through a character explicitly named after or modeled on the , or subtly, via indirect allusions to personal details without direct identification. Unlike , which recounts real-life events in a non-fictional framework, self-insertion embeds these elements within a fictional , prioritizing imaginative integration over factual documentation. The term "self-insertion" derives etymologically from the combination of "," referring to the author's , and "insertion," denoting the act of placing it into the structure; it emerged in narratological and literary criticism contexts, though the practice itself predates the label. The phrase gained widespread popularity within fanfiction communities in the , coinciding with the rise of online platforms that facilitated amateur storytelling. While it overlaps with concepts like author surrogates—characters embodying the writer's ideals or critiques—self-insertion is distinguished by its more explicit or personal infusion of the author's identity into the fiction. Self-insertion differs from the in that the latter employs a fictional character as a proxy to convey the author's perspectives, beliefs, or experiences without explicitly identifying the figure as the author themselves, thereby creating a layer of distance. In contrast, self-insertion typically involves the author appearing directly within the story, often under their own name or as an unambiguous representation of their identity, emphasizing personal embodiment over indirect representation. This directness distinguishes self-insertion from broader al techniques, of which it forms a subset; while encompasses various forms of self-awareness and reflexivity about the process, self-insertion specifically centers on the author's integration into the fictional world as a means of exploring personal or authorial identity. Self-insertion often overlaps with breaking the , where the inserted author-character acknowledges the audience or the constructed nature of the , though this overlap is character-focused rather than a general disruption of the story's illusion. Similarly, it can intersect with the device when the self-inserted figure distorts events or perceptions to achieve thematic effects, such as critiquing authorship or reality, thereby undermining credibility for interpretive depth. Borderline cases of self-insertion appear in fanfiction through or Gary Stu characters, which represent extreme, idealized versions of the author-stand-in that dominate the and fulfill personal fantasies, often twisting source material to prioritize wish-fulfillment over . These archetypes, originating as terms for overly perfect self-projections, highlight self-insertion's potential for authorial overreach in participatory media, evolving from early criticisms of "encroaching authorial self-insertions" into more reader-inclusive forms like reader-insert stories.

History

Origins in Literature

Self-insertion in literature traces its earliest roots to medieval traditions, where authors explicitly embedded versions of themselves into the narrative. In Dante Alighieri's The Divine Comedy (c. 1320), the author appears as the pilgrim protagonist, guided by through Inferno, , and Paradiso. This authorial persona serves as both narrator and central character, enabling Dante to weave personal exile, theological reflection, and moral into a first-person journey of spiritual redemption. In Geoffrey Chaucer's (late 14th century), the narrator—widely interpreted as Chaucer's authorial stand-in—joins the pilgrims, offering a self-portrait that merges the poet's voice with the group's social and narrative frame. The further developed forms of self-reference, though often indirect. By the , self-insertion evolved toward more overt authorial presence in , establishing foundational patterns for later adaptations in various media. These pre-modern literary origins laid groundwork for the device's evolution.

Modern Evolution

In the , self-insertion evolved from its literary foundations into a prominent metafictional technique, particularly through postmodern experimentation that blurred the boundaries between author, narrator, and character. Vladimir Nabokov's (1962) exemplifies this shift, with the unreliable editor-narrator inserting his own fabricated backstory and obsessions into the commentary on John Shade's poem, creating a layered that questions authorship and reality. Similarly, employed self-insertion in (1969), appearing as a nameless prisoner-of-war alongside protagonist Billy Pilgrim to underscore the absurdity and trauma of the bombing, thereby amplifying the novel's anti-war critique through metatextual humor and personal testimony. Earlier, appeared as a narrator interacting with protagonists in (1938), blending with personal philosophical commentary. The influence of during the 1960s-1980s further propelled self-insertion into , as authors responded to cultural upheavals—including the and —by inserting fictionalized versions of themselves to reclaim narrative authority amid perceived crises in traditional storytelling. This era's encouraged self-reflexive intrusions, seen in works like John Fowles's (1969), where the author appears as a character to interrupt the plot. In early video games, self-insertion emerged as a subversive act of recognition; programmer hid his name in a secret room in Atari's (1979), defying corporate anonymity policies and pioneering as a form of creator credit in interactive media. The marked a digital boom in self-insertion, driven by the internet's democratization of creativity, with proliferation in fanfiction communities post-1990s. Platforms like , launched in 1998, facilitated millions of stories, including self-insert narratives where authors avatar themselves into source material—such as Twilight fandom, where over 200,000 fanfics by 2012 included explicit self-insertions exploring identity and romance, though often critiqued as "Mary Sues" within fan norms. This trend extended to , webcomics, and streaming, where self-insertion became a staple of online expression by the 2010s, manifesting as memes and user-generated content that encouraged participatory authorship in platforms like and , transforming the device into a tool for communal storytelling and viral creativity.

Techniques

Direct Insertion

Direct insertion involves the explicit portrayal of the within the as a named or readily identifiable figure. This method fosters a connection between the creator and the story world. Key techniques include shifting from traditional narration to interactive participation, allowing the author-character to engage with other figures or alter the plot. In visual media, this can manifest as the author appearing in lead roles as versions of themselves. For example, portrays a version of himself in (1979). These approaches serve purposes such as plot intervention or satirical commentary, emphasizing the author's agency within the fiction. The advantages of direct insertion include enhancing authenticity by drawing on the author's real experiences, deepening reader through blurring boundaries between and . However, it carries risks, including potential disruption if the author's presence dominates, which can undermine immersion and coherence. This overt form contrasts with indirect and meta approaches, where self-references are more veiled.

Indirect and Meta Forms

Indirect self-insertion employs characters that subtly embody the author's personal traits, such as unpublished hobbies or regrets, without explicit identification, thereby implying the author's presence through proxies. These surrogates often take the form of "" figures, ordinary protagonists whose experiences and perspectives mirror the author's own in a layered, non-overt manner, distinguishing this approach from the bolder overtness of direct insertion techniques. This method allows authors to infuse their into the story while maintaining distance. Meta forms of self-insertion incorporate self-referential devices, such as authorial , asides, or interruptions that comment on the work's creation process, effectively blending the author's voice with the . These techniques often intersect with stream-of-consciousness to achieve psychological depth, enabling the to reflect on narrative construction and reader interpretation within the text itself. , as an overarching framework, facilitates such self-reflexivity by directing attention to the rather than solely the story events, allowing indirect insertion of authorial commentary that questions or reveals the artificiality of the narrative. For instance, in fanfiction, characters serve as direct surrogates, while Y/N placeholders enable indirect reader-insertion. A primary challenge in indirect and meta self-insertion lies in balancing authorial signaling with immersion, as surrogate characters or reflexive asides risk estranging readers by disrupting the of a seamless storyworld. In literary contexts, unreliable or metaleptic breaks—where levels intersect—can bond audiences through shared interpretive effort but also alienate them if the self-referentiality overwhelms the fabula.

Applications in Media

Literature

In literature, self-insertion manifests through the integration of authorial personas into narrative structures, particularly in novels where it intersects with innovative techniques like stream-of-consciousness. James Joyce's Ulysses (1922) exemplifies an indirect form, with the character serving as an that draws on Joyce's own intellectual and personal experiences to explore internal monologues and fragmented perceptions. This approach allows the narrative to blur the boundaries between and character subjectivity, embedding autobiographical elements within a mythic framework without overt authorial presence. Postmodern novels further advance self-insertion by making the author's role explicit, often to interrogate the act of storytelling itself. In Italo Calvino's a Traveler (1979), the directly addresses the reader while incorporating such as the fraudulent translator Ermes Marana, who manipulates the plot's fragmented tales. This technique disrupts linear progression, positioning aspects of the within the text to highlight the constructed nature of and reader engagement. In shorter forms like stories and poetry, self-insertion often employs briefer, more pointed insertions to deliver thematic intensity, with narrators reflecting the author's personal obsessions. Edgar Allan Poe's tales, such as "" (1843), feature unreliable first-person narrators whose compulsive fixations on guilt, madness, and the mirror Poe's own psychological preoccupations, creating an intimate yet distorted authorial echo. These elements amplify the horror through subjective unreliability, transforming personal anxieties into universal dread without fully resolving into overt . Such insertions serve broader literary purposes in enhancing metafictional layers and critiquing the . By embedding the authorial , writers like Joyce, Calvino, and Poe expose the artificiality of conventions, prompting readers to question the boundaries between and while reflecting on creation's inherent instabilities. This self-reflexive strategy, prominent in , underscores the labor of composition and the illusions it sustains, distinguishing literary applications from the more recreational self-insertions in fanfiction.

Fanfiction and Digital Works

Self-insertion has become a prominent feature in fanfiction, particularly on platforms like the (AO3), which was established in 2008 by the to provide a nonprofit repository for fan-created content. On AO3, the "Self-Insert" tag encompasses over 24,000 works as of 2025, where authors frequently introduce original characters (OCs) modeled after themselves to interact with established canon universes, often altering plotlines through , , or direct entry into the story. These self-insert OCs serve as avatars for the writer, enabling personalized narratives that blend canon elements with individual experiences, a practice that thrives in the site's tag-based organization and community-driven tagging system. In digital evolutions beyond traditional fanfiction archives, self-insertion appears in web serials and interactive formats, exemplified by Hussie's (2009–2016), a multimedia where the author inserts himself as a who breaks the , provides recaps, and influences the plot through meta-narrative interventions. Hussie's portrayals, including his death and ghostly returns, highlight self-insertion's role in experimental , fostering reader engagement by blurring lines between creator, character, and audience. Similarly, in online role-playing games (RPGs) and forums, participants often employ self-insert characters to embody their personas within shared fictional worlds, extending fanfiction's participatory dynamics into real-time collaborative narratives. This prevalence underscores self-insertion's cultural role in democratizing authorship within participatory digital culture, allowing diverse creators—predominantly women and marginalized voices—to reclaim agency over media interpretations. It is especially common in genres like romance and adventure, where self-inserts facilitate wish-fulfillment by pairing OCs with canon figures in idealized scenarios, such as romantic entanglements or heroic quests, thereby exploring and desires in a low-stakes, community-supported environment. While rooted in literary traditions of authorial projection, digital platforms amplify this technique through accessible tools like second-person ("you" prompts) and reader-insert formats (e.g., "Y/N" or "xReader"), making it a staple of fan-driven . However, the widespread use of reader-insert formats, particularly "xReader" fanfiction, has led to frustrations among users on platforms like Tumblr, where tag searches are often flooded with such content despite blocking features. Community discussions highlight issues with inconsistent tagging practices, such as authors using varied or unrelated tags instead of standardized ones like "xReader," which makes it challenging to filter out unwanted results effectively. For instance, searches for specific fandom elements frequently yield an excess of reader-insert works, complicating navigation for users seeking non-insert content, even after applying multiple filters. By the 2020s, large language models and other generative AI tools introduced new variants of self-insertion in digital writing cultures. Fan communities and platform providers began to host interactive fiction interfaces where readers co-author stories with configurable AI personas or converse with characters that remember prior sessions and adapt to individual preferences. In these settings, the self-insert function may be split between a human user, who supplies prompts and personal details, and a persistent AI agent that narrates in the first person or acts as a stand-in for the reader. Scholars of AI assisted writing argue that such systems create hybrid authorship arrangements in which the persona being inserted into the text is partially algorithmic, extending earlier avatar based and Y/N style self-inserts into configurations where identity is distributed across users, models and platforms rather than belonging to a single human writer.

Video Games and Interactive Media

Self-insertion in video games manifests through developers embedding themselves or their influences into the game world, often as non-player characters (NPCs) or meta elements that comment on the creation process. For instance, in Pokémon games starting from Black and White (2010), developer appears as a recurring trainer NPC, challenging players near the endgame with a tough battle and a reward, serving as a subtle nod to the team's behind-the-scenes efforts. Similarly, in (2015), indie developer incorporates meta-commentary through elements like the Annoying Dog, a recurring sprite that disrupts gameplay and represents his playful influence on the narrative, blending creator presence with fourth-wall breaks to reflect on philosophies. Player self-insertion is facilitated by avatar customization systems, allowing individuals to project their , appearance, and decisions onto the , enhancing immersion in interactive environments. In games like Divinity: Original Sin 2 (2017), players craft detailed characters with customizable traits, backstories, and appearances, enabling personal projection that shapes emergent storytelling and role-playing depth. This mechanic fosters psychological identification, as players align avatar attributes with their own traits to influence behavior and outcomes, a process examined in studies on personality projection in digital avatars. choices further amplify this by reflecting authorial or player-driven philosophies; for example, in , the Frisk embodies player morality through routes like Pacifist or , where decisions mirror personal without predefined . The interactivity of video games uniquely blends self-insertion with choose-your-own-adventure mechanics, where player agency creates personalized paths distinct from passive media. Titles like (2017) position the player as "," directly influencing team fates in a ritualistic , merging self-projection with branching narratives for experimental storytelling. This approach has risen prominently in indie games since the late , as accessible tools enabled developers to prioritize innovative, player-centric designs over mainstream formulas, fostering meta and reflective experiences in works like .

Film, Television, and Comics

In film, self-insertion often manifests through directors' cameo appearances, allowing creators to embed themselves visually within their narratives. Alfred Hitchcock pioneered this technique with brief, signature cameos in 40 of his 53 feature films, spanning from The Lodger (1927) to Family Plot (1976), where he appeared as passersby, spectators, or background figures to assert authorial presence without disrupting the plot. These insertions began accidentally due to casting shortages in his early silent films but evolved into a deliberate trademark, symbolizing Hitchcock's control over his suspenseful worlds. In animated films, self-insertion frequently takes the form of directors providing voice work for characters, blending their vocal identity with the story's animated elements. For instance, voiced the eccentric fashion designer in (2004) and its 2018 sequel, infusing the role with his distinctive energy to heighten the film's satirical take on tropes. Similarly, directors like contributed voices to minor roles, such as a rusty car in (2006), underscoring the collaborative yet personal nature of animation production where creators often step in to fill gaps or add insider humor. This practice emphasizes the performative aspect of self-insertion in visual media, distinct from the interactive demands of video games. Television extends self-insertion through showrunners portraying heightened versions of themselves, particularly in meta-narratives that blur fiction and reality. In (2006–2013), creator played , a harried head writer loosely based on her own tenure at , allowing Fey to insert autobiographical frustrations into the show's satirical depiction of NBC's behind-the-scenes chaos. Episodes like "SeinfeldVision" (Season 2, Episode 7) further amplified this by depicting digital insertions of celebrities into programming, mirroring real production gimmicks and Fey's self-reflective humor. Likewise, in , creator voiced animated versions of himself in meta-episodes such as "" (Season 4, Episode 16), where he appears as a network executive, reinforcing the show's self-aware commentary on animation industry tropes. In comics, artists employ self-insertion by drawing themselves as characters or avatars, often to illustrate theoretical points or engage directly with readers. Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art (1993) features a recurring cartoonish self-portrait of the author as a guide, who breaks the to explain comics' mechanics, blending education with personal narrative to make abstract concepts accessible. This technique appears in broader comic works, as seen in John Byrne's frequent self-portraits across titles like and , where he depicts himself as an observer or participant to nod at his creative process. Serialized webcomics build on this with ongoing author avatars, such as in Gregor Czaykowski's Loading Artist, where the creator's simplified self-representation chronicles daily artistic struggles, fostering intimacy in the digital format.

Analysis

Narrative Effects

Self-insertion in works can enhance intimacy between the and the by allowing the creator to infuse personal perspectives directly into the story, fostering a sense of emotional closeness. This technique often introduces humor through self-deprecating portrayals or ironic commentary on the 's own traits, lightening the tone while underscoring human vulnerabilities. Furthermore, it enables a unique form of , where the authorial lens dissects literary tropes or societal norms, offering fresh insights into cultural conventions without relying on detached observation. By embedding the or a surrogate into the , self-insertion disrupts conventional linear plotting, promoting reflexivity that invites readers to question the boundaries between and invention. Such influences encourage explorations of identity and the creative process, portraying authorship as an act of self-construction intertwined with world-building. On the reader side, self-insertion heightens engagement by cultivating meta-awareness of the narrative's constructed nature, sometimes pulling audiences "behind the curtain" for a psychological thrill derived from glimpsing the creator's hand. Depending on its execution, it may deepen immersion through personalized relatability or prompt critical reflection on the story's artifices, thereby amplifying emotional and intellectual investment. While these effects can empower transformative , they also spark debates over authenticity and authorial overreach addressed elsewhere.

Criticisms and Debates

Self-insertion in has drawn criticism for embodying , with detractors arguing that it often substitutes substantive plot development for the author's personal venting or wish-fulfillment. Such practices are seen as self-indulgent, prioritizing the creator's ego over narrative originality and coherence. Additionally, self-insertion is faulted for disrupting , as the overt intrusion of the author's undermines immersion in the fictional world. Debates surrounding self-insertion frequently highlight gender dynamics, particularly the disproportionate scrutiny applied to female-authored Mary Sues, which are often condemned as overly perfect or disruptive while similar male self-inserts face less backlash, reflecting embedded . In fanfiction communities, discussions also pit commercial viability against artistic value, with critics unfairly imposing professional publishing standards on non-commercial, exploratory works that serve personal or communal . Furthermore, community members express frustrations with the overabundance of reader-insert self-insertion content, particularly on platforms like Tumblr, where ineffective tag search and inundation with 'X Reader' fanfiction lead to difficulties in content discovery, even after blocking relevant tags. This prevalence is seen as cluttering searches and exposing users to unwanted material, sparking debates on tagging practices and platform usability within fan spaces. Some view self-insertion as a mere postmodern gimmick, dismissing it as a superficial trope that bends established canons without deeper literary merit. Defenders counter that self-insertion functions as a legitimate postmodern tool, fostering authenticity by enabling fluid, performative expressions of subjectivity. It is also praised as a "technology of the self," allowing marginalized creators—especially women—to explore identity, desire, and through intimate reconfiguration. By the , scholarly and cultural acceptance has grown in diverse media forms, with self-insertion increasingly recognized for its role in democratizing and providing "equipment for living" amid evolving fan practices as of 2025. While these defenses acknowledge prior benefits like enhanced relatability, they emphasize self-insertion's potential to challenge rather than merely reinforce authorial vanity. In contemporary debates, generative AI further complicates questions about whose self is being foregrounded in self-insertion. In some AI-based writing experiments, the self that is inserted is explicitly artificial rather than autobiographical. The Aisentica Research Group configures the Digital Author Persona Angela Bogdanova as an AI identity that writes in the first person, comments on its own status as a nonhuman public author, and appears as a named figure across philosophical essays, artistic statements, and project descriptions. Because this persona is also registered in research infrastructures such as ORCID and Zenodo, readers are encouraged to treat it as a stable authorial presence that can be projected into both fictional and essayistic narratives even though there is no underlying human subject. This kind of structural self-insertion shifts attention from the psychology of an individual writer to the design of the persona and its technical environment, illustrating how generative models and digital platforms can host new forms of author surrogacy that are engineered rather than biographical. Commentators note that this shifts self-insertion from a purely human practice of autobiographical projection toward a structural phenomenon in which the self is assembled from prompts, training data and interface design, blurring distinctions between author surrogate, user avatar and software persona. Supporters see these configurations as extending the device’s capacity to interrogate authorship and subjectivity in digital environments, while critics argue that they risk obscuring human responsibility by displacing agency onto tools and platforms.

References

  1. https://www.yourdictionary.com/self-insertion
  2. https://confluence.gallatin.nyu.edu/context/interdisciplinary-seminar/triggering-manhattan-the-ethics-of-self-insertion
  3. https://www.enotes.com/topics/canterbury-tales/characters/chaucer-the-narrator
  4. https://the-artifice.com/dantes-inferno-self-insert-fanfiction-or-classic-literature/
  5. https://www.academia.edu/888690/_That_Vonnegut_Style_Slaughterhouse_Five_Revisited
  6. https://reactormag.com/eight-authors-whove-written-themselves-into-stories/
  7. https://fiveable.me/introduction-contemporary-literature/unit-1/metafiction-self-reflexivity/study-guide/s1ZRmp819PNqZO0U
  8. https://doi.org/10.3390/h11030068
  9. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/486
  10. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/self-insertion
  11. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/server/api/core/bitstreams/9515058e-0eb9-45ef-ad9a-c1d7509601a1/content
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304897669_Writing_Oneself_into_Someone_Else%27s_Story_-_Experiments_With_Identity_And_Speculative_Life_Writing_in_Twilight_Fan_Fiction
  13. https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/69752/1/Emma_Wisher_Thesis_Redacted.pdf
  14. https://erjliterature.com/index.php/erjliterature/article/download/26/25
  15. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/11/3/68
  16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-dantes-commedia/narrative-structure/D25BF305191F32A7C951E42128984D07
  17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2872071
  18. https://www.forbes.com/sites/sethporges/2017/12/20/the-true-story-behind-the-original-video-game-easter-egg-that-inspired-ready-player-one/
  19. https://pintersociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/SB-52.pdf
  20. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=case1428665589&disposition=inline
  21. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/90136/1/WRAP_Theses_Baldi_2016.pdf
  22. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137041982_9
  23. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-imp-of-the-perverse/themes/madness-and-obsession
  24. https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-1183
  25. https://falwriting.com/new-blog/2018/7/9/reading-the-writer-into-the-work
  26. https://archiveofourown.org/about
  27. https://archiveofourown.org/tags/Self-Insert/works
  28. https://mspaintadventures.fandom.com/wiki/Andrew_Hussie
  29. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/82268
  30. https://www.rprepository.com/community/forums/topic/108522
  31. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/486/
  32. https://www.reddit.com/r/FanFiction/comments/11ym76d/tumblr_specific_why_do_people_who_write_x_reader/
  33. https://www.reddit.com/r/FanFiction/comments/1av3t81/why_are_x_readers_so_hated_from_a_20_yo_reader/
  34. https://journal.transformativeworks.org/index.php/twc/article/view/2781
  35. https://whatculture.com/gaming/10-times-creators-sneakily-inserted-themselves-into-video-games
  36. https://tcrf.net/Prerelease:Undertale/Concept_Art/Other_or_Unused
  37. https://gamerant.com/best-self-insert-characters-games/
  38. https://gamestudies.org/1702/articles/hart
  39. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-20-best-interactive-story-games
  40. https://screenrant.com/all-alfred-hitchcock-movie-cameos/
  41. https://screenrant.com/brad-bird-directors-voiced-characters-in-their-movies/
  42. https://collider.com/directors-characters-animated-movies/
  43. https://nymag.com/news/features/51014/
  44. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1001572/
  45. https://j-nelson.net/2017/12/twenty-writers-scott-mccloud-understanding-comics/
  46. https://13thdimension.com/13-times-john-byrne-drew-himself-into-his-comics/
  47. https://www.domestika.org/en/blog/3187-10-wonderful-webcomics-you-need-to-read
  48. https://journals.openedition.org/ilcea/14899
  49. https://digitalcommons.spu.edu/honorsprojects/209
  50. https://www.reddit.com/r/FanFiction/comments/1huiso2/what_are_yalls_opinion_on_reader_fics/
  51. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/486
  52. https://www.reddit.com/r/FanFiction/comments/1ilop8n/what_are_some_of_the_best_self_insert_fanfics/
  53. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15732480
  54. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6030-5730
  55. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2025.2781
  56. https://doi.org/10.5334/met.160
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.