Hubbry Logo
Welsh syntaxWelsh syntaxMain
Open search
Welsh syntax
Community hub
Welsh syntax
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Welsh syntax
Welsh syntax
Welsh syntax
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The syntax of the Welsh language has much in common with the syntax of other Insular Celtic languages. It is, for example, heavily right-branching (including a verb–subject–object word order), and the verb for be (in Welsh, bod) is crucial to constructing many different types of clauses. Any verb may be inflected for three tenses (preterite, future, and unreality), and a range of additional tenses are constructed with auxiliary verbs and particles. Welsh lacks true subordinating conjunctions, and instead relies on special verb forms and preverbal particles to create subordinate clauses.

There are at least four registers or varieties of Welsh that the term Modern Welsh is used to describe. There is Biblical Welsh, which is archaic and not part of colloquial usage, although some educated Welsh speakers are familiar with it. Two more registers are Literary Welsh and Colloquial Welsh; this article primarily describes Colloquial Welsh, except where noted. Finally, there are also a number of other dialects which diverge from these three varieties of Welsh. These various dialects are understudied, with the exception of some research by Awbery (1990).

Word order

[edit]

Verb-Subject-Object word order

[edit]

Welsh is a language with verb-initial word order, the usual word order being verb–subject–object (VSO).

In addition to a verb and a subject, which are obligatory in a canonical clause, Welsh typically organizes additional information as follows:

Preverbal particle — Verb — Subject — Direct object — Indirect object — Adverbials (prepositional phrase, adverb, etc.)

Preverbal particle Verb Subject Negator Direct object Adverbial (prepositional phrase) Adverbial (adverb)
Mi roddais i lyfr da i dad Eleri ddoe.
AFFIRMATIVE give.1SG.PST PRONOUN.1SG MUT-book good to-PREP MUT-father Eleri yesterday
'I gave Eleri's father a good book yesterday.'
Ni roddais i ddim llyfr da i dad Eleri ddoe.
NEGATIVE give.1SG.PST PRONOUN.1SG NEGATIVE book good to-PREP MUT-father Eleri yesterday
'I did not give Eleri's father a good book yesterday.'
A roddais i lyfr da i dad Eleri ddoe?
INTERROGATIVE give.1SG.PST PRONOUN.1SG MUT-book good to-PREP MUT-father Eleri yesterday
'Did I give Eleri's father a good book yesterday?'

The syntactic analysis of the VSO word order of Welsh is currently under debate. Richard Sproat and Ian Roberts have argued for an underlying subject-verb-object (SVO) word order with the surface VSO word order derived by syntactic movement of the verb to a higher position in the clause.[1][2] On the other hand, Robert Borsley has argued against an underlying SVO analysis.[3]

In favour of an underlying SVO analysis

[edit]

The arguments that Roberts makes about Welsh syntax are largely based on data from the Literary Welsh dialect.[4]

The first step in the argument that Roberts makes for an underlying SVO analysis of Welsh word order is to argue that the subject moves out of the verb phrase to a position higher in the clause. This argument is made on the basis of data from passives, unaccusatives, and raising predicates in Welsh. The derived subjects in all three of these constructions behave like subjects of other predicates in Welsh in that they cannot be separated from the verb. That is, the subject must immediately follow the verb, as can be seen in (1)—(3).

(1) Welsh passive
(2) Welsh unaccusative
(3) Welsh raising predicate

This suggests that the subjects in these three constructions are true subjects. On the assumption that all subjects in the language occupy the same position in the clause, this entails that the subject in Welsh must raise to a higher position in the clause than where it was base generated.[11]

Another argument for movement of the subject in Welsh comes from reconstruction effects. Andrew Barss noticed that there is an interpretive difference between (4a) and (4b).[12]

(4) a. [Which pictures of himselfi/j] does Johni think that Billj would like e
b. [Criticize himself*i/j], Johni thinks Billj never would e

In (4a), himself can be interpreted as either coreferential with John or Bill. However, in (4b), it can only be interpreted as coreferential with Bill.

Cheng-Teh Huang analyzes these English facts by adopting the VP-Internal Subject Hypothesis and assuming that the subject raises from the verb phrase to a position higher in the clause. That is to say, the structure of (4b) is what is given in (5).[13]

(5) [ti criticize himselfi], John thinks Billi never would e

The closest c-commanding element that binds the reflexive pronoun, himself, is the trace of Bill (see Principle/Condition A of the binding (linguistics) theory).

The facts in Welsh parallel the facts in English. Specifically, the reflexive in (6a) can be interpreted as coreferential with either John or Bill, whereas the reflexive in (6b) can only be interpreted as coreferential with Bill.

(6a)

[Pa

which

luniau

pictures

ohono'i

of-his

huni/j]

self

y

PTCL

mae

is

Johni

John

yn

PTCL

credu

believe

y

PTCL

mae

is

Billj

Bill

yn

PTCL

eu

their

hoffi

like

[Pa luniau ohono'i huni/j] y mae Johni yn credu y mae Billj yn eu hoffi

which pictures of-his self PTCL is John PTCL believe PTCL is Bill PTCL their like

'Which pictures of himself does John believe Bill likes?'[14]

(6b)

[Siarad

speak

â’i

with-his

hun*i/j]

self

y

PTCL

mae

is

Johni

John

yn

PTCL

meddwl

think

bod

that-is

Billj

Bill

[Siarad â’i hun*i/j] y mae Johni yn meddwl bod Billj

speak with-his self PTCL is John PTCL think that-is Bill

'Talk to himself, John thinks Bill does.'[15]

The most straightforward analysis of these facts is to adopt the same analysis that Huang gives for English. That is to say, if one adopts the VP-internal subject hypothesis and assumes that the subject raises to a higher position in the clause, then an account of these facts is straightforward.[13] Moreover, this suggests that the underlying word order is indeed SVO.[16]

The second step in the argument that Roberts gives to motivate an analysis of Welsh word order in which the underlying structure of the clause is SVO and the verb has moved to a higher position in the clause is to observe that the verb appears in a higher position than the subject. If the subject has raised from a VP-internal position, then it follows that the verb must have also raised in order to be in a higher clausal position and to show up to the immediate left of the subject.[17]

Against an underlying SVO analysis

[edit]

On the other hand, Borsley has argued against an underlying SVO analysis with the surface word order derived by verb movement. One of the arguments that he gives against such an analysis is based on negation. In Welsh, the negative adverb ddim cannot be immediately followed by an object noun phrase, as the following examples show.

(7)

*

 

Welodd

saw

Siôn

Siôn

ddim

NEG

y

the

defaid

sheep

* Welodd Siôn ddim y defaid

{} saw Siôn NEG the sheep

'Siôn did not see the sheep.'[18]

Borsley claims that this means the Welsh grammar must have a constraint against ddim appearing next to an object noun phrase. He further argues that it would not be possible to state such a constraint since ddim is not underlyingly next to the object noun phrase if one adopts an underlyingly SVO analysis of Welsh.[21]

Note that Borsley takes the ddim of a sentence like Welson ni ddim ci "We didn't see a dog" not to be this negative adverb, but a homophonous negative quantifier.[22]

Focus

[edit]

Welsh has a highly developed system of fronting constituents in focus in which parts of a sentence can be moved to the front for emphasis, rather than stressing them phonetically as English does. Most elements of a sentence can be moved to sentence-initial position.

Yng Nghaerdydd mae hi'n byw (mae hi'n byw yng Nghaerdydd) - 'She lives in Cardiff'
Ioan mae hi'n ei garu (mae hi'n caru Ioan) - 'She loves Ioan'

The subject of a verb causes a soft mutation.

Fi roddodd lyfr da i dad Eleri (rhoddais i lyfr da i dad Eleri) - 'I gave a good book to Eleri's father'

Sentence elements following yn, such as verbnouns, lose the yn when moved initially:

Bwyta sglodion oeddwn i (roeddwn i'n bwyta sglodion) - 'I was eating chips'

Nominal syntax

[edit]
Main articles: colloquial Welsh morphology and literary Welsh morphology

Determiners precede the noun they modify, while adjectives generally follow it. A modifier that precedes its head noun often causes a mutation, and adjectives following a feminine noun are lenited. Thus:

  • dogfen 'a document'
  • y ddogfen 'the document' (dogfen is lenited because it is feminine)
  • hen ddogfen 'an old document' (dogfen is lenited because hen 'old' precedes it)
  • dogfen fer 'a short document' (ber (feminine form of byr) is lenited because it follows a feminine noun)

Genitive relationships are expressed by apposition. The genitive in Welsh is formed by putting two noun phrases next to each other, the possessor coming second. So English The cat's mother, or mother of the cat, corresponds to Welsh mam y gath – literally, 'mother the cat'; 'the project manager's phone number' is rhif ffôn rheolwr y prosiect – literally, 'number phone manager the project'. Only the last noun in a genitive sequence can take the definite article.

Verbal syntax

[edit]

Syntax with bod

[edit]

Bod "be" is used for a number of constructions, including equating two noun phrases, using adjectives predicatively, and forming a wide range of grammatical tenses.

Noun and adjective complements

[edit]

One way to equate noun phrases is to use what Gareth King calls "identification" forms of bod, with the word order NP1 – bod – NP2.[23]

Diffoddwr tân ydy Gwyn.
'Gwyn is a fireman.'

Alternatively, a verb-initial word order may be used, with the "affirmative forms" of bod and a particle yn which triggers the soft mutation: bod – NP1 – yn+SM – NP2. This construction has both interrogative and negative variations which utilize different verb-forms and require, in the case of the negative, the addition of ddim "not".

Mae Gwyn yn ddiffoddwr tân.
'Gwyn is a fireman.'
Ydy Gwyn yn ddiffoddwr tân?
'Is Gwyn a fireman?'
Dydy Gwyn ddim yn ddiffoddwr tân.
'Gwyn isn't a fireman.'

The predicative adjective construction uses this same verb-initial construction: bod – NP – yn+SM – adjective.

Mae Gwyn yn ddiflas.
'Gwyn is miserable.'
Ydy Gwyn yn ddiflas?
'Is Gwyn miserable?'
Dydy Gwyn ddim yn ddiflas.
'Gwyn isn't miserable.'

Verb complements

[edit]

In addition to the inflected preterite, future, and conditional tense forms, Bod - subject - yn - verbnoun (with no mutation) is used to express a range of other times:

  • Present:
Mae bws yn dod.
'A bus is coming.'
  • Imperfect:
Roedd bws yn dod.
'A bus was coming.'
  • Future:
Bydd bws yn dod.
'A bus will be coming.'
  • Conditional:
Byddai bws yn dod.
'A bus would be coming.'
  • Subjunctive:
Pe bai bws yn dod.
'If a bus were coming.'

While the present and imperfect have special interrogative and negative forms, the future and conditional forms:

  • form questions by leniting the verb, and
  • form negative statements by adding ddim after the subject, and optionally leniting the verb.

All of these bod constructions may be given perfect meaning by replacing yn with wedi (lit. "after"), while substituting newydd (lit. "newly") for wedi (together with lenition of the verbnoun) expresses what may be termed the immediate perfect ("has just", etc.). Thus:

  • Mae Siân yn mynd – 'Siân is going'
  • Mae Siân wedi mynd – 'Siân has gone'
  • Mae Siân newydd fynd – 'Siân has just gone'

Syntax without bod

[edit]

Welsh has inflected preterite, future, and conditional tenses. These do not take any particle such as yn, but instead soft mutation occurs after the subject: Welson ni gi? 'We saw a dog' (where gi is the lenited form of ci 'dog'). In negative sentences the soft mutation is instead placed on dim "not": Welson ni ddim ci 'We didn't see a dog'.

Questions are formed the same way as with the future and conditional bod forms above, as are negative statements except when there is a specific noun phrase functioning as the direct object. A specific noun phrase is a pronoun (fi, nhw, etc.), a definite noun (yr ardal, y ffilm, etc.), or a noun preceded by a definite adjective (fy nhad, ei chalon hi, etc.). In these cases, ddim is replaced by mo (a contraction of ddim o). Thus:

  • Ffeindies i ddim poteli 'I didn't find any bottles', but Ffeindies i mo'r poteli 'I didn't find the bottles'
  • Welodd hi mo Siôn 'She didn't see Siôn', but Welodd hi mohono fo 'She didn't see him' (mo, like o, must inflect for pronominal objects)

The preterite, future, and conditional can also be formed with the appropriate inflected tense of gwneud 'to do' with a verbal noun (again with soft mutation after the subject). The preterite may also be formed with ddaru (which is the third person singular preterite of darfod 'to happen'), which does not alter its form.

For affirmative statements with inflected verbs, it is particularly common to attach mi or fe, preverbal particles which trigger the soft mutation:

Mi brynes i gar newydd.
'I bought a new car.'

The passive voice can be expressed with the verb cael 'get' followed by the verb noun modified by a possessive adjective. For example:

Cafodd Susie ei gweld.
'Susie was seen'. (lit. 'Susie got her seeing', cf. English Susie got seen).

The agent is introduced with the preposition gan 'with, by'.[24] A "static passive", expressing the result of an action, can be expressed with the verb bod 'to be' followed by the preposition wedi 'after' and, again, the verbal noun modified by possessive adjective. For example:

Mae'r ddinas wedi'i dinistrio.
'The city is destroyed'. (lit. 'The city is after its destroying')

The prepositional phrase can also be used attributively:

llythyr wedi'i agor
'an opened letter' (lit. 'a letter after its opening')

The construction can be negated by replacing wedi with heb 'without'.[25]

Subordination

[edit]

Relative clauses

[edit]

There are two relative pronouns in Welsh, a and y. A (which causes soft mutation) is used in "direct" relative clauses, i.e. those where the relativised element is the subject of its clause or the direct object of an inflected verb (rather than a periphrastic construction with bod):

y dyn a welais i - 'the man that I saw'
y dyn a welodd fi - 'the man that saw me'

A cannot coexist with mae. Instead, a special form, sydd or sy, is used:

y dyn sy'n hapus - 'the man who's happy'

In all other cases, known as "indirect" relative clauses - those where the relativised element is genitival or the object of a preposition - , y, the complementizer, is used.

y dyn y gwrandawais i arno fo - 'the man that I listened to'
y dyn y cafodd ei fam ei charcharu - 'the man whose mother was imprisoned'

Note that because the object of a verbal noun is genitival, all periphrastic constructions take y.

y dyn y mae hi'n ei adnabod - 'the man she knows'

In the colloquial language, both a and y are typically omitted, and soft mutation occurs in both types of relative clause:[26]

y fenyw werthodd Ieuan y ceffyl iddi - 'the woman that Ieuan sold the horse to'

which in more formal Welsh would be

y wraig y gwerthodd Ieuan y ceffyl iddi - 'the woman that Ieuan sold the horse to'

Complementization

[edit]

Syntactic complementization

[edit]

Welsh has a number of complementizers used under different circumstances. Y is used in non-focused affirmative clauses other than the present periphrastic with bod:

Mae hi'n gwybod y bydd hi'n dod. - 'She knows she's coming.'
Ydy o'n meddwl yr elai hi i Gaerdydd? - 'Does he think she would go to Cardiff?'

Affirmative clauses with the main verb in the preterite are an exception. The construction with y is ungrammatical in many spoken dialects (as well as in the literary language),[26] and a construction based on the preposition i and the verbnoun is used instead:[27][28]

Ydy o'n meddwl iddi hi fynd i Gaerdydd? - 'Does he think she went to Cardiff?'

The present periphrastic with bod tends to use a construction with the verbnoun bod in a genitival construction with the subject of the subordinate clause:

Rwy'n teimlo eich bod chi'n anhapus. – 'I feel that you are unhappy.' (lit. 'I am feeling your being unhappy')

Negative clauses can be made negative normally or by replacing y with na:

Mi welith hi [fy] mod i ddim yn anhapus. = Mi welith hi na dydw i ddim yn anhapus. - 'She will see that I'm not unhappy.'
Gwn i yr eith hi ddim. = Gwn i nad eith hi. - 'I know she won't go.'

Focused clauses are complementized with mai (in the North) or taw (in the South):

Gwyddost ti mai fi ydy'r gorau. - 'You know that it's me who's the best.'

Focused clauses can be made negative with nad, or made negative normally (with mai nid or mai dim):

Gwyddost ti nad fi ydy'r gorau. = Gwyddost ti mai nid fi ydy'r gorau. = Gwyddost ti mai dim fi ydy'r gorau. - 'You know that it's not me who's the best.'

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Welsh syntax

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Welsh syntax encompasses the principles and rules that govern the formation of sentences and phrases in the , a Brythonic Celtic language primarily spoken in and characterized by its Insular Celtic heritage. As of the year ending March 2025, there are an estimated 828,600 speakers of Welsh in Wales, representing about 26% of the population. Key features include a verb-subject-object (VSO) in finite declarative clauses, making it typologically distinct among , as exemplified by sentences like Prynodd Elin dorth o fara ("Elin bought a loaf of bread"), where the verb prynodd ("bought") precedes the subject Elin and object dorth o fara. This VSO structure extends to head-initial phrasing across major categories, such as verb phrases and noun phrases, with restrictions on placement in embedded clauses and an elaborate inventory of clause-initial particles for functions like , questioning, and focus. A defining syntactic mechanism in Welsh is initial , where the initial consonant of a word changes (e.g., soft mutation, nasal mutation, or aspirate mutation) based on preceding syntactic triggers, such as the presence of a direct object or , serving to mark without dedicated case morphology. Verb agreement is limited, typically occurring only with pronominal subjects in synthetic forms (e.g., Cerddon nhw adre "They walked home"), while lexical subjects do not trigger agreement, reflecting a pro-drop tendency in colloquial varieties. Non-finite clauses, often introduced by particles like i or bod, play a central role in complex constructions, including infinitival complements and periphrastic tenses, contributing to the language's rich layering of auxiliary and serial verb structures. Dialectal and register-based variation further shapes Welsh syntax, distinguishing literary (or standard) Welsh from colloquial spoken forms, as in the colloquial Ddywedodd e ddim byd wrtha i ("He didn't say anything to me") versus the more formal Ni ddywedodd ddim wrthyf. These differences often involve particle usage, patterns, and flexibility under emphasis, with ongoing research highlighting contact influences from English on contemporary syntax in bilingual communities. Overall, Welsh syntax exemplifies the analytic tendencies of modern while retaining archaic traits like VSO order, offering insights into historical change and typological universals.

Basic Clause Structure

Word Order

Welsh exhibits a verb-subject-object (VSO) in affirmative declarative main , a feature shared with other but rare typologically, occurring in only about 10-12% of the world's languages. This structure is evident in both transitive and intransitive without preverbal particles. For instance, a simple transitive is Gwelais i y llyfr ('I saw the book'), where gwelais is the inflected ('saw-1SG'), i is the ('I'), and y llyfr is the object ('the book'). An intransitive example is Cânodd y plentyn ('The child sang'), with cânodd as the ('sang-3SG') and y plentyn as the subject ('the child'). Linguistic analyses supporting a surface VSO structure point to phenomena such as adverb placement and negation scope, which align with a flat or non-hierarchical clause structure where the verb precedes the subject directly. Adverbs, particularly manner adverbs, often appear immediately after the verb and before the subject in unmarked contexts, as in Gwelodd ddoe Emrys y ci ('Emrys saw the dog yesterday'), where ddoe ('yesterday') follows the verb gwelodd ('saw-3SG') but precedes the subject Emrys. Negation markers in simple clauses, such as ni, precede the verb but do not disrupt the postverbal subject-object sequence, as seen in Ni welodd Emrys y ci ('Emrys did not see the dog'), confirming the verb's initial position over the subject. These patterns argue against a derived VSO from deeper embedding, favoring a base-generated VSO order. Alternative generative approaches propose an underlying subject-verb-object (SVO) order, with the surface VSO derived via verb movement to a higher functional head, such as Tense or a split domain, drawing parallels to Irish syntax where similar V-to-I movement occurs. In this view, the subject remains within the (VP), and the verb raises past it to satisfy agreement or licensing requirements, as analyzed in minimalist frameworks. includes coordination facts and remnant movement possibilities, where portions of the VP can be fronted, suggesting an initial SVO base before extraction. This movement-based account contrasts with flat VSO proposals by positing hierarchical structure akin to SVO languages. Overall, Welsh syntax is strongly right-branching, meaning heads precede their complements across major categories like verbs, nouns, and prepositions, leading to structures where modifiers and arguments follow the head, as in noun phrases like y ty mawr ('the big house'). This contrasts with left-branching tendencies in some analytic languages, where modifiers often precede heads more rigidly, such as in relative clauses, highlighting Welsh's synthetic, head-initial profile despite its VSO order.

Preverbal Particles

In Welsh syntax, preverbal particles such as mi and fe serve as affirmative markers in declarative clauses, appearing before finite verbs to indicate positive polarity and triggering soft mutation on the following element. The particle mi is typically associated with present and future tenses, while fe is used for habitual or past contexts, though both can co-occur with various inflected verb forms except the third-person singular present or imperfect of the copula bod. For example, the sentence "Mi aethon ni" illustrates mi with a past tense verb, translating to "We went," where aethon undergoes soft mutation from the root aeth. Similarly, "Fe welodd Siôn y ci" means "Siôn saw the dog," with fe preceding the mutated verb welodd (from gwelodd). For negation, the particles ni (pairing with mi) and nid (pairing with fe) introduce negative declarative clauses in formal or literary Welsh, also occupying preverbal positions and triggering soft mutation. These negators replace their affirmative counterparts to convey polarity, as in "Ni welais i y llyfr," meaning "I didn't see the book," where ni precedes the mutated welais (from gwelais). Likewise, "Nid oedd y ty mawr" translates to "The house was not big," with nid before the mutated copular form oedd (from bod). Syntactically, these particles are analyzed as occupying a functional head within the structure, such as the Tense Phrase (TP) or a Focus Phrase (FP), immediately preceding the in the verb-subject-object (VSO) order of declaratives. This positioning reinforces the finiteness of the and interacts with the base VSO by marking the left periphery without altering the core sequence. Both affirmative and negative particles consistently trigger on the initial consonant of the following or noun, a hallmark of Welsh morphosyntax that signals their grammatical role. Historically, these particles developed from pronouns and expletives, with mi deriving from first-person singular forms and fe from the third-person pronoun ef, evolving into dedicated complementizers amid the rise of verb-second (V2) effects around the 14th–16th centuries before a shift to stricter verb-initial order. This process, detailed in analyses of diachronic changes, involved phonological reduction and functional specialization, contributing to the loss of earlier V2 patterns. Dialectally, mi predominates in northern Welsh, while fe is more common in southern varieties, where particles are frequently omitted in colloquial speech, though effects persist.

Negation and Questions

In Welsh, negation is primarily expressed through preverbal particles in formal or literary registers, where ni (before consonants) or nid (before vowels) precedes the verb and triggers soft mutation. For example, the sentence Nid yw hi'n dawel translates to "She is not quiet," with nid negating the copula bod and causing mutation on the following element. This structure aligns with the verb-subject-object (VSO) order of affirmative clauses, placing the particle immediately before the inflected verb. In subordinate clauses, na or nad serves a similar function, as in Credaf [na fydd hi yno] ("I believe [that she won't be there]"). Historically, this preverbal negation follows Jespersen's Cycle, where an original marker like Middle Welsh ny(t) weakened and was reinforced by the postverbal element ddim, originally meaning "thing" or "anything." In colloquial or spoken Welsh, the preverbal particle is frequently omitted or reduced (e.g., to d or t), with relying more heavily on the postverbal ddim, which functions as the primary clausal negator and often requires an n-word (negative polarity item) in subject, object, or position for full sentential . Structures like Dydy hi ddim yn dawel ("She isn't quiet") exemplify this, where ddim follows the weak negative form of the copula dydy (a contraction of does dy) and licenses n-words such as dim byd ("") or byth ("never"). Emphatic employs ddim postverbally to intensify , particularly with objects or adverbs, as in Methodd y ci y ci ddim ("The dog didn't see the dog at all"), where ddim underscores the beyond basic clausal marking. Non-finite uses peidio â (or softened beidio â) with infinitives, e.g., Peidio â gwneud dim ("Not doing anything"). Yes/no questions in Welsh maintain the underlying VSO order but are marked by a preverbal particle or, in spoken varieties, rising intonation alone. In formal Welsh, the particle a introduces the question, as in A yw hi'n dod? ("Is she coming?"), where a precedes the inflected without altering the structure. Responses echo the verb or auxiliary, such as Ydw ("Yes, I am") or Nac ydw ("No, I am not"), reflecting polarity focus rather than simple affirmatives. Colloquial speech often drops a, relying on prosody for distinction, e.g., Yw hi'n dod? with upward intonation, though the particle y(d) may appear before vowel-initial verbs like Y mae yno rywbeth? ("Is there something there?"). questions use similar patterns, answered with do ("yes") or naddo ("no"). Wh-questions front the interrogative word or phrase to clause-initial position, followed by the VSO order, often with the particle a or yr in literary Welsh but frequently omitted in speech. Common wh-words include beth ("what"), pwy ("who"), pa ("which/what"), pryd ("when"), and lle ("where"), as in Beth wnaethoch chi? ("What did you do?"), where beth fronts and triggers soft mutation on the verb if applicable. Subject wh-questions avoid movement, maintaining VSO, e.g., Pwy welodd y ddraig? ("Who saw the dragon?"), while object or adjunct questions involve extraction, sometimes with resumptive pronouns in complex cases. Prepositional wh-questions front the entire PP, like I bwy welaist ti y ddraig? ("To whom did you see the dragon?"). In embedded contexts, wh-questions use complementizers like y or mai, with pa often specifying alternatives, e.g., Gwn i [pa lyfr y buychoch] ("I know [which book you bought]"), or infinitival i-clauses for non-finite embeddings, such as Gwn i [i beth y gwnech] ("I know [what to do]"). Soft mutation may apply to the embedded verb, but wh-words like pa resist it. Modern spoken Welsh shows English contact influence in the formation of question tags, particularly through invariant forms borrowed into varieties and occasionally calqued back into bilingual speech. Structures like nac yw e? ("isn't it?") or reduced tags using na(c) and oni(d) particles, e.g., Yn' bydd? ("won't she?"), parallel English invariant tags such as isn't it?, reflecting substrate transfer in tag questions for emphasis or confirmation. This convergence is evident in northern and southern dialects, where English-like tags attach to VSO clauses, as analyzed in contact linguistics studies.

Nominal Syntax

Noun Phrases

Noun phrases (NPs) in Welsh exhibit a right-branching , in which the head is followed by its post-nominal modifiers, such as adjectives and prepositional phrases, while a limited set of pre-nominal elements, including determiners, occupy positions to the left of the head. This organization aligns with the broader syntactic patterns of , where pre-nominal functional categories like determiners and quantifiers precede the lexical , but attributive modification is predominantly post-head. The internal complexity of NPs is thus asymmetrical, with pre-nominal slots filled by a closed class of items that often interact with phonological processes such as initial . The definite article in Welsh takes three forms: y before nouns beginning with a consonant (e.g., y ci 'the dog'), yr before nouns beginning with a vowel or with h (e.g., yr ŷ 'the house', yr hen 'the old one'), and elided 'r following a vowel in rapid speech or certain syntactic contexts (e.g., mam 'r ŷ 'mother of the house'). This article marks definiteness and typically triggers soft on following feminine singular nouns, though masculine nouns remain unaffected (e.g., y gath from cath 'cat', but y ci unchanged). Indefinite NPs, by contrast, lack a dedicated indefinite article and are often bare (e.g., ci 'a dog'), though specificity can be conveyed by pre-nominal un 'one, a' or rhyw 'some, a certain' (e.g., un ci 'a dog', rhyw gath 'some cat'). Possession within NPs is realized through two primary constructions: pre-nominal possessive pronouns, which agree in and number and induce soft on the following head (e.g., fy llyfr 'my ', where llyfr remains unchanged but would mutate in applicable cases like fy gath 'my cat' from cath), or post-nominal genitive , where the bare possessor NP follows the head without a preposition (e.g., llyfr y plentyn 'the child's '). In the , the possessor is typically definite and precedes any further modifiers of the head, maintaining the right-branching order. determiners are also pre-nominal and inflect for , number, and proximity: proximal forms include hwn (masculine singular, 'this'), hon (feminine singular, 'this'), and plural hyn; distal forms are hwnnw, honno, and hynny (e.g., y ci hwn 'this dog', often with the article for emphasis). These function as definite determiners and may co-occur with the article in layered structures. Quantifiers occupy pre-nominal positions and frequently trigger soft on the head . Universal pob 'every' and partitive rhai 'some' exemplify this, as in pob plentyn 'every child' (no needed here, but applicable to mutable initials) or rhai cathod 'some cats', where plural agreement applies without on the head. Other quantifiers like llawer 'many' or sawl 'several' follow similar patterns, integrating into the layer and constraining the of the NP. Adjectives, when modifying the , uniformly follow the head in this right-branching framework (e.g., y ci mawr 'the big dog').

Adjectival and Predicative Complements

In Welsh, attributive adjectives typically follow the noun they modify, resulting in a postnominal order (NA). For example, tŷ mawr means "big house," where mawr ("big") appears after the head tŷ ("house"). This placement is standard for the majority of adjectives, though a small class of prenominal adjectives, such as hen ("old"), gwir ("true"), and prif ("main"), precedes the noun and often triggers soft on the following noun, as in hen gath ("old cat"). When multiple postnominal adjectives modify a noun, they follow a fixed order prioritizing size, then shape or color, provenance, age, and finally quality, as in gardd fawr breifat ("large private garden"). Attributive adjectives exhibit and number agreement through initial consonantal , primarily soft after feminine singular nouns. For instance, du ("black") becomes ddû following a feminine noun like gath ("cat"), yielding y gath ddû ("the "). In literary Welsh, some adjectives also inflect morphologically for and number, such as gwyn ("white") becoming gwen (feminine) or gwynion (plural), though this is largely obsolete in spoken varieties. Prenominal adjectives may similarly trigger soft on the noun, depending on its and number, as in y lwyd wawr ("the dawn"). Predicative adjectives, which ascribe properties to a subject, require the copula bod ("to be") and the predication marker yn, forming structures like Mae'r tŷ yn mawr ("The house is big"). Here, yn precedes the adjective and triggers soft mutation, as seen in Mae Gwyn yn ddio ("Gwyn is lazy"), where dio mutates from diog. Unlike attributive uses, predicative adjectives do not agree in gender or number with the subject and remain uninflected beyond mutation. For emphasis or identificational focus, the adjective may front with yw or ydy, as in Mawr yw'r tŷ ("The house is big"). Syntactically, predicative adjectives function as complements within a PredP (predication phrase) headed by yn, embedded under the copula bod in a small clause structure, as in mae Sioned yn hapus ("Sioned is happy"), where the AP (hapus) complements the Pred head. This configuration distinguishes predicative from attributive uses, with the former integrating into verbal copular clauses rather than nominal phrases. Comparative and superlative forms of adjectives are derived either synthetically with suffixes or analytically. Short adjectives often use -ach for the comparative (e.g., mawr "big" → mawrach "bigger") and -af or -aidd for relational or superlative derivations (e.g., mawr → mwyaf "biggest"), while longer adjectives employ mwy ("more") and mwyaf ("most"), as in mwy hapus ("happier") or y mwyaf hapus ("the happiest"). These forms typically appear in predicative position with bod and yn, such as Mae Sioned yn hapusach ("Sioned is happier"), and may precede nouns in attributive contexts without mutation after mwy or mwyaf.

Verbal Syntax

Copular Constructions with 'Bod'

In Welsh syntax, the verb bod ('to be') functions primarily as an auxiliary and copular verb, linking subjects to predicative complements in equative, ascriptive, locative, and existential constructions. Unlike content verbs, bod exhibits defective paradigms, inflecting irregularly for tense, aspect, and limited person/number agreement, while enabling progressive and perfective formations central to verbal . The present tense of bod displays a range of forms conditioned by person, number, and discourse context, with formal/literary variants differing from colloquial spoken ones. In the first person singular, wyf (or yw) appears in elevated registers, as in Rwyf i'n athro ('I am a teacher'), while colloquial speech favors dw i. The second person singular uses wyt, as in Wyt ti'n blentyn ('You are a child'), and the third person singular employs yw or mae (the latter for indefinite or non-pronominal subjects), yielding Mae Menai yn afon ('Menai is a river'). For third person plural, maen marks agreement with pronominal subjects, e.g., Maen nhw'n siarad Cymraeg ('They speak Welsh'), though mae often suffices in impersonal or broad contexts. Inflection on bod extends across tenses, with person and number marking more prominent in the present and imperfect than in future or preterite forms. The future tense uses the invariant stem bydd, as in Bydd hi'n athro ('She will be a teacher'), inflecting minimally for person in some dialects (e.g., byddaf for first singular). The preterite employs bu, also largely invariant, e.g., Bu e yn Lloegr ('He was in England'), while the imperfect draws from oedd, with fuller agreement like Oeddwn i'n blentyn ('I was a child'). These inflections support bod's role in tense marking, particularly in subordinate clauses where it periphrases non-finite verbs. As a copula, bod predicates identity or equation between a subject and a nominal, adjectival, or clausal complement, often in verb-initial VSO order characteristic of Welsh declaratives. In equative constructions, it equates definite NPs, as in Y meddyg ydy Gwyn ('The doctor is Gwyn'), where the copula ydy (a present variant) facilitates inversion for focus. Ascriptive uses link subjects to indefinite predicates, e.g., Mae Siôn yn athro ('Siôn is a teacher'), attributing a class or . This copular function underscores bod's syntactic versatility, raising to C-position in main clauses to host preverbal particles. The progressive aspect relies on bod plus the particle yn followed by a verbal noun, forming periphrastic ongoing actions, as in Mae hi'n canu ('She is singing') or Roedd y plant yn llofa ('The children were playing'). This construction, obligatory for present progressives, integrates aspectual marking directly into the copular frame, with yn licensing the verbal noun as a predicative complement. Locative predication typically employs bod without the aspectual particle yn, directly taking a prepositional phrase (which may include the preposition yn meaning 'in') as complement to denote position or in place, e.g., Mae'r llyfr ar y bwrdd ('The book is on the table') or Mae Gwyn yn yr ardd ('Gwyn is in the garden'). Here, the copula predicates spatial relations, contrasting with progressive uses by omitting the aspectual particle. Existential and impersonal constructions further highlight bod's role via the third-person singular mae, introducing indefinite entities or events without a thematic subject, as in Mae'n bwrw glaw ('It is raining') or Mae 'na gath yn y tŷ ('There is a cat in the house'). This impersonal mae functions expletively, associating with weather expressions, existentials marked by 'na ('there'), or infinitival complements, filling a gap in finite verbal paradigms by enabling non-agreeing predication.

Non-Copular Verbal Constructions

In Welsh syntax, non-copular verbal constructions typically feature finite content verbs in a verb-subject-object (VSO) order, particularly for expressing past and future tenses without the copula bod. For instance, the sentence Gwelais i geffyl translates to "I saw a ," where the finite verb gwelais (saw.1SG) precedes the subject pronoun i (I) and the mutated direct object geffyl (horse). Similarly, Mi welodd Rhiannon ddraig means " saw a ," illustrating the unmarked VSO pattern with the affirmative particle mi optionally preceding the verb. This structure holds in literary and formal registers, contrasting with more periphrastic forms in colloquial speech. Periphrastic constructions involving verbal nouns (VNs) are central to non-copular verbal syntax, often employing such as gwneud (do) combined with the VN to convey non-progressive aspects. An example is Gwnaeth agor y drws, meaning " opened the door," where gwnaeth (did.3SG.PST) functions as the auxiliary, followed by the VN agor (open). VNs in these contexts exhibit both nominal and verbal properties, serving as the core of the action while allowing complements like direct objects, as in Gwnaeth y ddynes agor y drws ("The opened the door"). Transitivity in these constructions is realized without overt case marking on direct objects, which immediately follow the verb or auxiliary-VN complex and undergo soft on their initial consonants. In Prynodd Dafydd y llyfr ("Dafydd bought the book"), the direct object y llyfr (the book) shows no mutation due to the definite article blocking it, but indefinite objects like beic in Prynodd y ddynes feic ("The woman bought a bike") mutate to feic. This , triggered by adjacency to the preceding , applies specifically to objects of finite transitive verbs and underscores the head-initial nature of Welsh phrases. Serial verb-like structures are rare in Welsh, with argument encoding favoring prepositional phrases over verb serialization for multi-argument s. For example, the siarad (speak) takes a prepositional object as in siarad â rhywun ("speak with someone"), avoiding a direct serial construction and instead integrating the recipient via the preposition â. This preference maintains the VSO integrity while accommodating complex arguments through adpositional means. Intransitive s preserve the VSO order without alteration, positioning the subject immediately after the . Consider Rhedon nhw i ffwrdd ("They ran away"), where the intransitive rhedon (ran.3PL) leads the pronominal subject nhw (they) and i ffwrdd (away). Another case is Cofiodd hi ("She remembered"), with the cofiodd (remembered.3SG) followed by the subject hi (she). These patterns ensure syntactic consistency across transitive and intransitive contexts in non-copular clauses.

Tense, Aspect, and Mood Formation

In Welsh syntax, tense, aspect, and mood are realized through a combination of synthetic inflections on finite and periphrastic constructions involving the bod ('to be') followed by a (VN). Synthetic tenses are limited: the is formed with endings such as -ais for first-person singular (e.g., gwelais 'I saw'), the future employs personal endings like -af (e.g., canaf 'I will sing'), and the conditional uses -wn (e.g., canwn 'I would sing'). These inflections apply primarily to the indicative mood and are more common in literary or formal registers, while the verb bod exhibits a fuller with six synthetic tenses. Periphrastic formations predominate in spoken and colloquial Welsh, especially for expressing future and conditional tenses, where an inflected form of bod precedes the VN, often linked by the particle yn (e.g., Byddaf i yn canu 'I will sing'; Byddwn i yn canu 'I would sing'). This analytic structure allows for nuanced tense marking beyond synthetic limits, with bod occupying the tense (T) head position and the VN serving as its complement in the aspectual or verbal projection. Aspects are exclusively periphrastic: the progressive uses yn + VN (e.g., Yr wyf yn darllen 'I am reading'), the perfective employs wedi + VN (e.g., Yr wyf wedi darllen 'I have read'), and habitual aspect is conveyed analytically via bod forms or particles like fe with the VN (e.g., Fe fyddaf yn canu bob dydd 'I sing every day'). A recent perfective variant involves newydd + VN (e.g., Yr wyf newydd ddysgu 'I have just learned'). Moods, particularly the subjunctive, combine synthetic and periphrastic strategies; synthetic subjunctives draw from forms (e.g., canai 'that he/she sing'), while periphrastic subjunctives use i + VN in subordinate clauses (e.g., Eich bod yn dod 'That you come') or bod + yn + VN for potential readings (e.g., Byddaf yn caru 'I may love'). These constructions typically appear in embedded contexts like purpose or conditional clauses, with the auxiliary in T and the VN in a lower complement position. In modern Welsh, English contact has accelerated the shift toward analytic periphrastic forms over synthetic inflections, particularly in tense-aspect marking, as evidenced in varieties influenced by where progressive and perfective uses align more closely with English patterns.

Complex Sentences

Coordination

In Welsh syntax, coordination links elements of equal status, such as noun phrases, verb phrases, or clauses, using a set of coordinators that include ac (and), neu (or), and ond (but). These coordinators typically introduce the second conjunct, preserving the underlying verb-subject-object (VSO) word order of Welsh. For instance, the sentence Prynodd Elin dorth o fara ac aeth adre illustrates clause coordination, where ac connects two independent VSO clauses meaning "Elin bought a loaf of bread and went home." Similarly, neu and ond function analogously, as in Mae Siôn yn canu neu yn dawnsio ("Siôn is singing or dancing") and Gwelodd Mair y ddraig ond ni welodd hi’r llew ("Mair saw the dragon but she did not see the lion"). Coordinated elements exhibit syntactic parallelism, requiring the conjuncts to match in category and structure to ensure grammaticality. Noun phrases, for example, coordinate straightforwardly with ac, as in Gwelais [i a Megan] geffyl ("Megan and I saw a horse"), where the coordinated subject triggers first-person singular agreement on the verb, reflecting left-conjunct agreement typical in pronominal cases. Verb phrases maintain this parallelism without gapping or deletion mechanisms common in English; instead, each conjunct retains its full VSO form, such as Mae Gwyn yn ddiog ac yn cysgu ("Gwyn is idle and sleeping"). In clause coordination, subjects may be omitted in the second conjunct if identical to the first, but the initial verb or auxiliary position is preserved, as in Deffrodd Mair a mynd allan ("Mair woke up and went out"). This structure avoids the forward conjunction placement seen in some Indo-European languages, emphasizing the paratactic equality of conjuncts. Asyndetic coordination, lacking an overt coordinator, occurs primarily in lists of noun phrases, such as bwrdd, cadair a llyfr ("table, , and book"), where commas separate items before the final a or ac. Full asyndetic linking is rarer in modern Welsh but appears in historical texts, contrasting with the syndetic patterns dominant today. Correlative structures, involving paired elements like naill...neu ("either...or"), are uncommon; simple with a single coordinator prevails, as in Gwelodd Mair y ddraig ac fe welodd hi’r llew ("Mair saw the dragon and she saw the "), maintaining VSO integrity across conjuncts without complex embedding.

Subordination

In Welsh syntax, subordination is characterized by the absence of true subordinating conjunctions comparable to those in English or other ; instead, it relies heavily on preverbal particles and specific verb inflections to introduce dependent clauses. Particles such as i (used for purpose clauses, e.g., i'w weld ef 'to see him') and yn (marking aspectual or progressive interpretations in certain contexts) signal subordination without lexical content, often combining with verbal nouns to form non-finite structures. This system allows for while preserving the language's core verb-initial properties, distinguishing it from coordination mechanisms that link independent clauses. Subordinate clauses in Welsh can be finite or non-finite, with the latter predominating in embedded contexts like complements or adverbials. Finite subordinates typically employ inflected verb forms that maintain verb-subject-object (VSO) order, similar to main clauses, but omit affirmative particles like mi or fe found in matrix declaratives (e.g., Credaf [y bydd Sioned yn dod] 'I believe [that Sioned will come]'). Non-finite subordinates, by contrast, use verbal nouns (e.g., darllen 'reading') preceded by particles such as i or the copula bod, resulting in subject-verb order (e.g., i Sioned darllen y llyfr 'for Sioned to read the book'). Tense in subordinates often aligns with the matrix clause, employing future or subjunctive forms for congruence, though non-finite constructions may lack explicit tense marking and rely on contextual interpretation. Historically, the development of subordination in Welsh traces back to (c. 1150–1500), where adverbial clauses frequently lacked dedicated , evolving instead through the reanalysis of preverbal elements into particles. This shift contributed to the rise of a complementizer system, as detailed in analyses of verb-second loss, where pronominal subjects in specifier positions were reanalyzed as heads hosting particles like y or a in embedded contexts. By Early Modern Welsh, this resulted in a more standardized use of particles for subordination, reducing reliance on paratactic structures.

Relative Clauses

Relative clauses in Welsh are typically post-nominal modifiers that follow the head noun they restrict or describe, maintaining the verb-subject-object (VSO) word order characteristic of the language's main clauses. This right-branching structure allows for embedded clauses to provide additional information about nouns, such as in y ci a welais i ("the dog that I saw"), where the relative clause a welais i modifies y ci. Unlike many , Welsh relative clauses do not employ a wide range of relative pronouns; instead, they rely primarily on invariant particles or zero marking. The primary relativizer in literary Welsh is the invariant particle a, which introduces restrictive relative clauses and triggers soft mutation on the following verb. For subject relatives, colloquial Welsh often omits a entirely, resulting in a zero relativizer followed by a gap where the subject would appear, as in y dyn welodd y ci ("the man who saw the dog"). In object relatives, a precedes a gap in synthetic verb constructions, exemplified by y ci a welodd y dyn ("the dog that the man saw"). For non-subject positions like prepositional objects or possessors, a resumptive strategy is common, involving inflected prepositions or pronouns, such as y fenyw werthodd Ieuan y ceffyl iddi ("the woman to whom Ieuan sold the horse"). In periphrastic constructions, object resumption may involve agreement clitics, as in y car mae ’r lladron wedi ei ddwyn ("the car that the thieves have stolen"). Non-restrictive relative clauses, which provide supplementary rather than defining the head , are set off by commas or intonation and typically use a in a manner similar to restrictive clauses. For adjunct positions within non-restrictive clauses, overt wh-words like lle ("where") or pryd ("when") are required, as in y blwyddyn honno, pryd gafodd ei eni ("that year, when Dylan Thomas was born"). Resumptive pronouns are more frequent in these constructions, particularly for non-subject gaps. Historically, Middle and archaic Welsh featured prenominal relative clauses, where the relative construction preceded the head noun, often using demonstratives like yr hwn ("who, which"), as in y dyn yr hwn a gafodd y wobr ("the man who got the prize"). This prenominal positioning is now obsolete in modern Welsh, having shifted to the current post-nominal pattern. Syntactically, the particle a functions as a heading a Complementizer Phrase (CP) in the , facilitating for gap strategies while allowing resumption in island-sensitive contexts. This analysis aligns s with other wh-dependencies in Welsh, such as questions, where gaps predominate for subjects and direct objects but resumption occurs for obliques.

Focus and Topicalization

Fronting Constructions

In Welsh syntax, fronting constructions involve the displacement of a phrasal constituent (XP) to a preverbal position for discourse purposes such as or focus marking, contrasting with the unmarked verb-subject-object (VSO) order. These structures, often termed "abnormal sentences" in , allow any major constituent—including noun phrases, prepositional phrases, adverbials, or even verbs—to precede the , thereby highlighting the fronted element without altering the core VSO sequence that follows. This mechanism serves to establish a topic, convey contrast, or emphasize new information, and it is a hallmark of Welsh's flexible system. Topicalization typically features XP-fronting accompanied by a resumptive in the base position to maintain referential continuity, particularly when the fronted element is the subject or object. For instance, the sentence Y llyfr hwn, welais i ef ("This book, I saw it") fronts the object y llyfr hwn ("this book") as the topic, followed by the verb welais ("saw") and a resumptive ef ("it") in object position. This construction is analyzed as left-dislocation, where the fronted XP adjoins to CP or occupies Spec-CP, with the resumptive ensuring ; it is optional but common in or explanatory contexts to separate the topic from the comment. Preverbal particles like a or dialectal variants (mi in southern Welsh, fe in northern) may co-occur, adding emphasis without triggering verb-second (V2) effects in modern Welsh. Contrastive focus, by contrast, often involves fronting without a resumptive , especially for adverbials, verbs, or , to highlight opposition or corrective information. An example is Ddoe aethon ni ("Yesterday we went"), where the adverb ddoe ("yesterday") is fronted to contrast with an implied alternative time, followed directly by the aethon ("we went") and subject ni ("we"). Here, the fronted XP targets Spec-CP for focus projection, and the structure lacks resumption since the focused element is not coreferential within the ; soft on the (e.g., aeth from /gɛθ/) may occur under the XP Trigger Hypothesis, where preceding XPs induce . This type of fronting is pragmatically driven, appearing in responses to questions or corrections, and differs from by its narrower scope on exhaustive or corrective interpretation. Syntactically, both topicalization and contrastive focus are motivated by A'-movement to Spec-CP, satisfying discourse requirements within a complementizer phrase that licenses the fronted constituent while preserving the verb's initial position in the matrix clause. In generative analyses, the fronted XP moves from its canonical post-verbal base position (e.g., VP or TP adjunct) to Spec-CP, with the finite verb raising to T(ense) or adjoining to C(omplementizer) in VSO languages like Welsh; this accounts for the consistent VS order post-fronting without full V2 inversion of the subject. Historical evidence from Middle Welsh reveals a more robust V2 pattern, where fronted XPs in Spec-CP triggered verb movement to C, as in examples like Riuedi mawr o sswydwyr a gyuodassant ("Great multitudes of warriors rose up"), reflecting a shift from V2 to strict VSO by the early modern period due to erosion of preverbal particles. Dialectal preferences influence fronting usage, with northern Welsh varieties showing a greater inclination toward fronting constructions, often reinforced by particles like fe or ddaru-clauses (e.g., Ddaru i weld y llyfr hwn "I did see this book"), which preserve archaic emphases and more consistently than southern forms. This regional variation stems from historical retention of features in northern speech, leading to higher frequencies of XP-fronting in colloquial northern registers for both topical and focal purposes, while southern Welsh may favor periphrastic alternatives or simpler VSO structures.

Cleft Sentences

Cleft sentences in Welsh are biclausal constructions used to express focus by highlighting a particular constituent, typically through a copula linking a fronted element to a . These structures allow for emphasis on subjects, objects, or adjuncts, distinguishing them from simpler fronting mechanisms by their exhaustive or contrastive interpretive effects. Unlike monoclausal fronting, clefts involve a specific syntactic frame that identifies the focused element as the unique or salient one satisfying the predicate in the relative clause. The prototypical it-cleft in Welsh follows the structure mae [focused constituent] y [relative clause], where mae is the present tense form of the copula bod 'to be', and y introduces the with a gap or resumptive corresponding to the focused element. For example, Mae'n Nhundee y byw hi translates to 'It is in that she lives', emphasizing the locative adjunct 'n Nhundee as the unique location of the event described in the y byw hi 'that she lives'. Another illustration is Beic brynodd y ddynes, meaning 'It was a bike that the woman bought', where the object beic 'bike' is fronted and the brynodd y ddynes 'that the woman bought' provides the background, with no soft on the focused due to its extracted status. Syntactically, it-clefts are analyzed as involving movement of the focused constituent to a clause-initial position, akin to [Spec, CP] in generative terms, followed by the copula and a headed by y. This creates an identity predication where the initial element is equated with the trace or gap in the , triggering default third-person singular agreement on the regardless of the focused constituent's features, as in Fi welodd ddraig 'It was I that saw a dragon' (with welodd in third singular, not welais in first singular). This agreement pattern underscores the non-extractive nature of clefts, distinguishing them from wh-interrogatives or free relatives in unbounded dependency constructions. Wh-clefts, or pseudoclefts, in Welsh typically begin with a wh-phrase such as beth 'what', followed by the copula and an open clause, yielding structures like Beth a wnaethoch? Canu 'What did you do? Sing', where the wh-clause sets up the question and the following nominal provides the exhaustive answer. These constructions can reverse order for identificational purposes, as in Prifddinas Cymru yw Caerdydd 'The capital of Wales is Cardiff', emphasizing Caerdydd via the copula yw. Like it-clefts, they involve a relative-like clause but prioritize the wh-initial frame for highlighting the variable's value. Welsh clefts convey two main focus types: exhaustive focus, which identifies the fronted constituent as the unique satisfier of the relative clause (e.g., implying no other location in Mae'n Nhundee y byw hi), and contrastive focus, which sets the element against alternatives through intonation or context (e.g., rising tone on the copula in Caerdydd sy’n ddinas hardd 'It is that is a beautiful '). The exhaustive reading arises from the biclausal identity structure, while contrastive effects often align with prosodic cues. Historically, cleft constructions in Welsh developed during the period (c. 1150–1500) as a means to express contrastive focus within emerging verb-second (V2) constraints, evolving from earlier patterns involving hanging topics and particles like a or y(d) that marked extractions. This rise paralleled the generalization of V2 orders, with clefts serving to front non-subjects while maintaining clause-initial verb placement in the relative portion. In modern , a variety spoken by bilinguals in , cleft sentences show increased frequency as calques from Welsh syntax, where native speakers transfer the biclausal focus strategy to English structures like 'It was in that she lives', reflecting substrate influence on emphatic constructions and contributing to syntactic variation in contact settings.

References

  1. https://www.gov.wales/welsh-language-data-annual-population-survey-april-2024-march-2025-html
  2. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/syntax-of-welsh/3EEEC03DE211C6C01BA1DA6C8CDE1800
  3. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108769617.020
  4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248458245_On_the_nature_of_Welsh_VSO_clauses
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/244438883_Principles_and_Parameters_in_a_VSO_Language_A_Case_Study_in_Welsh
  6. https://www.sil.org/system/files/reapdata/12/47/76/124776055776617981985195799029708937420/SILEBR_2009_015.pdf
  7. https://users.aber.ac.uk/bmj/Ymchwil/complementizer_phrase3.pdf
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388222231_V2_to_V1_in_Welsh_The_role_of_preverbal_particles_and_fronted_adverbials_Journal_of_Historical_Syntax
  9. https://www.academia.edu/10940848/The_syntax_of_Welsh_negation
  10. https://www.mmll.cam.ac.uk/files/copil_3_1_willis.pdf
  11. https://users.aber.ac.uk/bmj/Ymchwil/Negative%20Preverbal%20Particles%20in%20Informal%20Welsh.pdf
  12. https://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/7991/1/130.pdf.pdf
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248458453_The_syntax_of_Welsh_direct_object_mutation_revisited
  14. https://www.asau.ru/files/pdf/2668403.pdf
  15. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/syntax-of-welsh/noun-phrases/A65929929F6DFADA420A79DEF98F4861
  16. https://repository.essex.ac.uk/11826/1/welshnp.pdf
  17. https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/article/download/899/1282
  18. https://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/learnwelsh/pdf/welshgrammar_a_article.pdf
  19. https://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/learnwelsh/pdf/welshgrammar_allrules.pdf
  20. https://repository.essex.ac.uk/311/1/mittendorf-sadler-eiss8.pdf
  21. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/7991/1/130.pdf.pdf
  22. http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss8/mittendorf-sadler-eiss8.pdf
  23. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:0d739107-19ed-4d50-9f0c-a1c9060de0e7/files/r3n2040774
  24. https://users.aber.ac.uk/bmj/Ymchwil/Copula_clauses_in_Welsh.pdf
  25. https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/article/view/864/1212
  26. https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/10/3/43
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353594771_Aspectuality_in_Welsh
  28. https://historicalsyntax.org/hs/index.php/hs/article/view/97/85
  29. https://ojs.tnkul.pl/index.php/rh/article/download/16362/15631/
  30. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/slcs.120.17hei/pdf
  31. https://www.academia.edu/9789777/Welsh_English_Syntax_Contact_and_Variation
  32. https://nlp.ipipan.waw.pl/HeadLex16/bonami_etal.pdf
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/syntax-of-welsh/8037F112CB770B8F0CBA07323BFD77E8
  34. https://books.google.com/books/about/Syntactic_Change_in_Welsh.html?id=CfcGpZJDYosC
  35. https://davidwillis.net/willis_spec_head.pdf
  36. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-linguistics/article/relativization-strategies-np-accessibility-in-welsh/AFA009A2736C96AF6C9F9CFF08344840
  37. http://davidwillis.net/limits_resumption.pdf
  38. https://davidwillis.net/diachrony.pdf
  39. https://hpsg.hu-berlin.de/hpsg2020/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Borsley-2020.pdf
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024384113000818
  41. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/5d248c34-dcce-442f-9b7f-8bd2113473ec/download
  42. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics/article/rise-of-itclefting-in-english-arealtypological-and-contactlinguistic-considerations1/4A7279BBCD9C8B061C719AA75B9CFDB2
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.