Hubbry Logo
XerocomusXerocomusMain
Open search
Xerocomus
Community hub
Xerocomus
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Xerocomus
Xerocomus
Xerocomus
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Xerocomus
Xerocomus subtomentosus
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Basidiomycota
Class: Agaricomycetes
Order: Boletales
Family: Boletaceae
Genus: Xerocomus
Quél. (1887)
Type species
Xerocomus subtomentosus
(L.) Quél. (1888)
Xerocomus silwoodensis
Xerocomus squamulosus
Xerocomus ferrugineus
Xerocomus illudens

Xerocomus is a genus of poroid fungi related to Boletus. Most members of Xerocomus are edible, though of mediocre gastronomical value and inferior to the sought-after porcini.

Taxonomy

[edit]

Many mycologists did not originally recognize the distinction between the two genera and placed Xerocomus taxa in genus Boletus. However, several molecular phylogenetic studies have demonstrated that Xerocomus is a heterogeneous genus of polyphyletic origin,[1] which has resulted in further division of Xerocomus into Xerocomellus and Hemileccinum.[2] The members of the genus Xerocomellus are more closely related to Boletus than true Xerocomus is, which is relatively distantly related to Boletus and more closely related to Phylloporus. Other former Xerocomus species have since been moved to Aureoboletus, Imleria, Hortiboletus and Rheubarbariboletus.[3][4][5]

Ladurner and Simonini published a monograph on Xerocomus in 2003,[6] but this predated the taxonomical revisions based on phylogenetic inferences. In 2008, Hills included 18 species found in Britain, not including some species sometimes treated as Xerocomus, and including Boletus pulverulentus and Boletus impolitus.,[7] currently placed in genera Cyanoboletus and Hemileccinum, respectively. More recent phylogenies have confirmed Xerocomus as monophyletic in its new restricted arrangement.[8]

Description

[edit]
Morphological features of xerocomoid boletes[2][9][10]
Boletus s.str. Hemileccinum Xerocomellus Xerocomus s.str.
Spore surface Smooth Smooth Longitudinally striated or smooth, never bacillate Bacillate
Hymenophoral trama Boletoid type with gelatinous lateral strata Boletoid type with gelatinous lateral strata Intermediate between boletoid and phylloporoid when fully developed with distinct but weakly gelatinous lateral strata Phylloporoid type with nongelatinous lateral strata
Pileipellis Trichoderm, sometimes collapsing, rarely ixotrichoderm or other Initially trichoderm but collapses with age Initially palisadoderm, typically encrusted Initially a trichoderm, never encrusted
Lateral stipe stratum Frequently gelatinous, 60-90 μM thick, thicker than that of Xerocomellus Similar to that of Leccinum species, ornamented with stipe scabrousities up to 400-640 μM thick Frequently not present, reduced to no more than 30-40 μM thick, not gelatinous Lateral stipe stratum never gelatinous and 80-200 μM thick

Species

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Xerocomus

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Xerocomus is a of ectomycorrhizal poroid fungi in the family , order , class , and phylum . Established by French mycologist Lucien Quélet in and typified by X. subtomentosus, the genus comprises slender basidiocarps featuring a dry, tomentose pileus, adnate angular pores (1–3 mm wide), and a phylloporoid, non-gelatinous hymenophoral trama. Basidiospores are ornamented with bacillae, and the pileipellis is a non-glutinous trichoderm. Phylogenetic analyses have revealed Xerocomus sensu lato to be polyphyletic within the subfamily Xerocomoideae, leading to the segregation of several lineages into distinct genera such as Xerocomellus, Hortiboletus, and Hemileccinum. Recent studies have further refined this, including the 2024 transfer of Xerocomus sisongkhramensis to the new genus Rostrupomyces and descriptions of new species like X. garhwalensis and X. rishikeshinus. In its strict sense, the genus included around 115 species as of 2023, primarily distributed in temperate and subtropical regions of the Northern Hemisphere, with some extending to the Southern Hemisphere. These fungi form symbiotic associations with trees in families like Betulaceae, Fagaceae, and Pinaceae, contributing to nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems. Many Xerocomus species are considered edible, though generally of mediocre culinary value compared to other boletes, and are collected for food in various regions. Notable examples include X. subtomentosus (suede bolete), a widespread species in and known for its brownish cap and non-staining flesh, and X. chrysenteron (which has been transferred to Xerocomellus in recent classifications).

Taxonomy and Etymology

Etymology

The genus name Xerocomus is derived from the words xēros (ξηρός), meaning "dry", and kōmē (κωμή), meaning "hair", in reference to the dry, tomentose (hairy or velvety) cap surface observed in the type species Xerocomus subtomentosus. This descriptive etymology highlights a key morphological trait that sets members of the apart from more viscid or smooth-capped boletes. Lucien Quélet, a prominent French mycologist, formally established the Xerocomus in 1887 within his work La Flore des Vosges, where he transferred several species previously classified under Boletus to this new taxon based on their distinct dry-habited features. The name thus differentiates Xerocomus from the broader Boletus, which lacks an explicit reference to dryness and encompasses a wider array of pore-forming fungi with varied surface textures.

Historical Development

The genus Xerocomus was established by French mycologist Lucien Quélet in 1887, with Xerocomus subtomentosus (originally described as Boletus subtomentosus L. 1753) designated as the ; the name derives from Greek xēros (dry) and kōmē (hair), alluding to the dry, tomentose cap texture of the type. Initially, Xerocomus species were encompassed within the broadly circumscribed genus Boletus sensu lato, reflecting the limited taxonomic resolution of boletes at the time. In early 20th-century treatments, such as Rolf Singer's 1947 classification in The in Modern Taxonomy, Xerocomus species were accommodated in section Subtomentosi, emphasizing shared morphological traits like the subtomentose pileus and non-reticulate stipe. This sectional placement persisted in subsequent works, treating Xerocomus as a subgroup within rather than a distinct . A significant advancement came with the 2003 monograph by Heinz Ladurner and Giovanni Simonini, Xerocomus s.l. (Fungi Europaei vol. 8), which provided the first comprehensive European treatment and recognized approximately 20 species based on detailed morphological analyses, illustrations, and keys. This work solidified Xerocomus as a key in the Xerocomoideae while highlighting intraspecific variability and regional . By the 2010s, molecular phylogenetic studies demonstrated the of Xerocomus sensu lato, prompting taxonomic revisions that segregated distinct clades into new genera, including Xerocomellus (established by Josef Šutara in for species with reticulate spores and bruising reactions) and Hemileccinum (also by Šutara in for taxa with impolite stipe features). These segregations refined genus boundaries, transferring like X. chrysenteron to Xerocomellus and X. impolitum to Hemileccinum based on DNA sequence data.

Phylogenetic Position

The genus Xerocomus occupies a position within the subfamily Xerocomoideae of the Boletaceae family, forming a clade that is sister to genera such as Boletus and Caloboletus based on multi-locus phylogenetic analyses. This placement reflects the evolutionary diversification within Xerocomoideae, where Xerocomus shares ectomycorrhizal associations and poroid hymenophores typical of the group. Key molecular studies have revealed the of the broad Xerocomus sensu lato (s.l.), prompting significant taxonomic revisions. Nuhn et al. (2013) utilized sequences from the nuclear ribosomal large subunit (LSU), translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF1), and largest subunit (RPB1) genes to demonstrate that species traditionally assigned to Xerocomus s.l. are distributed across multiple lineages, leading to the establishment of segregate genera like Xerocomellus, Aureoboletus, and Hemileccinum. These findings underscored the artificial nature of pre-molecular classifications and facilitated a more resolved phylogeny for the Xerocomoideae. Recent studies (2024–2025) continue to refine boundaries with new species descriptions in , supporting the of the core . Further research has supported the of a restricted Xerocomus comprising approximately 20-30 core , primarily from temperate s. Loizides et al. (2019) integrated ITS rDNA sequencing with distributional data from Mediterranean ecosystems, confirming the coherence of this narrowed circumscription while excluding polyphyletic elements reallocated to other genera. Phylogenetic reconstructions frequently rely on the ITS region and partial 28S rDNA sequences as primary markers, which identify synapomorphies including bacillate (rod-shaped) ornamentation and phylloporoid (oblique, non-gelatinized) hymenophoral trama as defining features of the core . In the broad sense, Xerocomus encompasses over 160 sensu lato as of , though post-revision taxonomies emphasize the reduced core group to maintain .

Morphology

Macroscopic Characteristics

Xerocomus produce medium-sized boletoid fruitbodies, typically lacking or rings, with caps measuring 3–15 cm in diameter. The cap is initially convex, becoming flatter with age, and features a dry to subtomentose surface that is neither viscid nor glutinous even when moist. Coloration varies widely across the , ranging from browns and olives to reddish hues, often developing cracks or areolate patterns as it matures, as seen in like X. subtomentosus. The pore surface consists of adnate to slightly tubes, forming white to yellow pores that are angular and relatively large, approximately 1–3 mm wide at maturity. These pores may bruise blue or remain unchanged upon injury, contributing to the genus's distinctive variability in reaction to handling. The stipe is central, 4–10 cm long and 1–3 cm thick, often tapering toward the base, with a dry, fibrillose to reticulate texture that generally matches the cap's coloration. The is pale yellow, unchanging or slowly bluing when cut or exposed, providing a fleshy but relatively slender overall appearance to the fruitbody. prints are characteristically olive-brown, aiding in field identification. These macroscopic traits reflect adaptations to ectomycorrhizal lifestyles, where fruitbody size can vary with host associations, though details remain genus-level generalizations.

Microscopic Characteristics

The microscopic features of Xerocomus species are diagnostic within the , particularly emphasizing ornamentation and tissue structure that distinguish the from related boletes. Basidiospores are typically to , measuring 10-18 × 4-6 μm, with bacillate-reticulate ornamentation visible under scanning electron microscopy, though appearing smooth under light microscopy; this ornamentation is in or weakly and contributes to the olive-brown characteristic of the . The bacillate surface serves as a key phylogenetic marker for Xerocomus stricto. Basidia are clavate, 25-35 × 8-10 μm in size, and predominantly 4-spored, arising from the and contributing to the fertile layer on both the tube surfaces and occasionally the stipe in mature specimens. The hymenophoral trama exhibits a phylloporoid organization, featuring lateral layers that diverge from a central mediostratum, with non-gelatinous hyphae that are densely arranged and often touching, lacking significant expansion in water mounts. The pileipellis is structured as a trichodermial layer, 80-200 μm thick, composed of non-gelatinous, cylindrical to inflated hyphal elements that are intertwined and suberect in young tissue, collapsing with age to form a compact covering without gelatinization. Cheilocystidia are typically absent or present only sparsely along the tube edges, while cystidiate elements may occur in the stipe , providing subtle differentiation from congeners with more prominent cystidial structures.

Ecology and Distribution

Symbiotic Relationships

Xerocomus species are primarily ectomycorrhizal fungi that form mutualistic symbioses with trees in the families (oaks and beeches), (pines), and (birches), enveloping host s with fungal hyphae to create a structured interface for nutrient exchange. In these associations, the fungi enhance host plant access to soil and through extensive hyphal networks that explore beyond the root depletion zone, while the trees provide the fungi with photosynthetically fixed carbohydrates, typically 10-20% of the plant's total carbon allocation. This bidirectional nutrient transfer supports tree growth in nutrient-poor soils and contributes to forest productivity. Host specificity among Xerocomus species varies, with some exhibiting broad compatibility across multiple tree genera; for instance, X. subtomentosus commonly associates with a range of and hosts, including oaks (Quercus), beeches (Fagus), and birches (Betula), reflecting its adaptability in mixed temperate forests. In contrast, certain species demonstrate greater specificity, such as associations predominantly with Quercus in oak-dominated woodlands, which may influence local fungal community structure and succession dynamics. Stable isotope analyses provide direct evidence of carbon flow from host to fungus in these symbioses, with ectomycorrhizal Xerocomus fruiting bodies showing δ¹³C depletion of 2-4‰ relative to saprotrophic fungi, indicative of plant-derived carbon routed through the mutualistic pathway rather than decomposition. Such isotopic signatures, observed in studies of boreal and temperate boletes including Xerocomus taxa, underscore the symbiotic dependency and distinguish these fungi from non-mutualistic decomposers.

Habitat Preferences

Xerocomus species are primarily terrestrial fungi that inhabit woodlands and s worldwide, thriving in environments with moderate levels ranging from coastal dampness to montane dryness. They exhibit a strong preference for well-drained soils, often with slightly acidic to neutral pH values between 5.5 and 7.0, which support their ectomycorrhizal lifestyles without waterlogging. These mushrooms commonly emerge in mixed deciduous-coniferous s, where they associate with leaf litter layers or grassy forest edges, facilitating nutrient exchange in humus-rich substrates. Fruiting bodies of Xerocomus typically appear from late summer through autumn in temperate regions, aligning with seasonal rainfall and temperature declines that promote sporocarp development. Certain species demonstrate adaptability to moderate disturbance, occurring in semi-urban parks, roadside plantings, or managed plantations alongside compatible trees.

Geographic Range

The genus Xerocomus is native to the , with a widespread distribution across , , and . In , it exhibits notable diversity, with fewer than 10 species recorded in Britain following post-2014 taxonomic revisions. Populations are also documented throughout , particularly in temperate regions from through the to the . In , occurrences span from western regions like and to eastern areas, including the in and extensive records in . Centers of diversity for Xerocomus are concentrated in and eastern , where species richness is highest, such as in southwestern (e.g., Province) with numerous lineages. The genus is sparse in tropical regions, with limited records even in tropical parts of like Province. Its distribution reflects a preference for temperate to boreal climates, often with altitudinal variation; for instance, species have been collected up to approximately 2000 m in the Indian Himalayas. In the Southern Hemisphere, Xerocomus species are introduced or expanding, primarily associated with planted ectomycorrhizal hosts like Eucalyptus and Pinus in regions such as southern Brazil and Australia. This expansion ties the genus's range to human-mediated tree distributions in otherwise non-native areas.

Diversity

Accepted Species Count

The genus Xerocomus is estimated to include approximately 115 accepted worldwide in the strict sense (s.str.), according to documentation from Species Fungorum as of 2023, with subsequent additions such as two new species described in 2025 bringing the total to around 117 or more. Following extensive taxonomic revisions that have segregated polyphyletic groups into distinct genera such as Xerocomellus, Hemileccinum, Hortiboletus, and Imleria, the circumscription of Xerocomus s.str. is defined by features like bacillate spores and phylloporoid trama, centered around the X. subtomentosus. Acceptance of species within Xerocomus relies on integrated evidence from molecular phylogenies—primarily internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and 28S rDNA sequences—combined with morphological traits like spore ornamentation and hymenophore trama structure, as well as ecological associations such as ectomycorrhizal partnerships with specific host trees. Many former synonyms and misplacements have been resolved since 2013 through multilocus analyses, reducing redundancy and clarifying monophyletic lineages within the Boletaceae. Recent generic segregations, such as the 2024 establishment of Rostrupomyces for former Xerocomus sisongkhramensis, continue to refine boundaries. Subgeneric divisions further refine this taxonomy; for instance, the nominotypical subgenus Xerocomus is characterized by bacillate spores and phylloporoid trama, distinct from segregates like the intermediate-trama group now in Xerocomellus. Ongoing challenges persist in delineating boundaries, particularly with Hortiboletus (encompassing the former X. rubellus complex) and Imleria (including I. badia, previously in Xerocomus), due to overlapping morphological and genetic features that require additional sampling for resolution.

Notable Species

Xerocomus subtomentosus, the of the , is characterized by its dry, suede-like to tomentose cap that is typically ochraceous-brown to brown, measuring 4–10 cm in diameter, and is commonly found in ectomycorrhizal association with trees such as and in mixed woodlands across (e.g., , Sweden, Italy) and (e.g., USA, California). This species is considered , though of mediocre culinary value, and has been studied for its of elements like mercury in fruiting bodies collected from various localities. Xerocomus squamulosus features a distinctly scaly with dark squamules on a background, 5–12 cm wide, and a stipe covered in scales; the pores upon damage, and it forms ectomycorrhizal associations with Nothofagus menziesii in forested habitats of . Xerocomus ferrugineus, notable for its rusty-, finely velvety up to 12 cm across and ribbed stipe, is a rare European species primarily reported from southern regions including the Mediterranean area, where it occurs mycorrhizally with like spruces and occasionally hardwoods in mixed forests. Xerocomus silwoodensis, a British-endemic member of the X. subtomentosus complex, is distinguished by its reddish-brown cap, whitish flesh unchanging on bruising, and association with poplars ( spp.) on calcareous soils; it is rare but known from limited sites in the UK, with additional records in . In eastern , Xerocomus illudens represents a regional exemplar, with a small to medium-sized fruitbody featuring a reddish-brown to tan cap 3–8 cm wide, yellow pores that do not stain significantly, and a reticulate stipe; it grows mycorrhizally with oaks (Quercus spp.) and other hardwoods in forests from to .

Recent Discoveries

In 2025, Nautiyal et al. described two new species of Xerocomus from the , X. garhwalensis and X. rishikeshinus, based on specimens collected in under banj oak () forests. These species were distinguished primarily through integrated morphological and molecular analyses, including (ITS) sequencing and phylogenetic placement, alongside detailed microscopic features such as spore size and ornamentation. X. garhwalensis features a deep yellow cap (4A8 in Kornerup & Wanscher color chart) that darkens with age and subfusiform basidiospores measuring (10–)11–12 × 4–5 μm with bacillate ornamentation, while X. rishikeshinus has a brownish-red to violet-brown velutinous cap (10D6 to 10E6) and smooth subfusiform basidiospores of 10–11(–12) × 4.5–5.0 μm. Both are ectomycorrhizal associates, highlighting their ecological role in oak-dominated ecosystems at elevations around 1954 m near Lamkot (30.34° N, 78.43° E). Recent expansions in Asian Xerocomus diversity have been documented through similar multi-locus approaches, including ITS barcoding, in understudied northern regions. For instance, a 2023 study from Province, , introduced two new species—X. galbanus and X. tenuistipitatus—along with material of Xerocomus cf. ferrugineus (distinct from the European X. ferrugineus), identified via ITS, nrLSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 sequencing combined with morphological traits like pileus color and hymenophore reactions. X. galbanus has a yellowish-green cap and weakly bluing hymenophore, spores 13–15 × 4.5–6 μm; and X. tenuistipitatus features a pale brown to wood-brown cap on a slender stipe, with spores 11–13 × 4–5 μm. The Xerocomus cf. ferrugineus material is characterized by a rusty-brown cap and yellow hymenophore that blues upon exposure, with subfusiform spores 10–13 × 4–5 μm. These findings, from collections in 2021–2022 at sites like Qinshui and Shangwoquan (elevations 1150–1770 m), underscore the utility of molecular barcoding in resolving cryptic diversity in temperate Asian forests. These discoveries emphasize the Indian Himalaya as a for Xerocomus, contributing to an updated global species count of approximately 117 or more accepted taxa in s.str. as of 2025 through such post-2020 additions. The integration of morphology, ITS-based , and ecological data not only refines boundaries but also signals untapped potential for further novelties in tropical Asian regions, where similar understudied habitats may harbor additional ectomycorrhizal specialists.

Human Interactions

Edibility and Culinary Uses

Species in the Xerocomus are generally considered , though most are of low culinary merit owing to their soft texture and mild flavor, rendering them inferior to more highly prized boletes such as (porcini). These mushrooms must be cooked prior to consumption, typically by , , or incorporating into mixed dishes, as raw can lead to gastric upset due to natural irritants present in many boletes. In European cuisines, species like Xerocomus subtomentosus are occasionally added to soups or other mixed mushroom preparations for subtle flavor enhancement. No specific toxins are known in the , though rare allergic reactions have been documented in sensitive individuals following consumption of related bolete species. Nutritionally, Xerocomus species offer moderate protein levels and low caloric content, with some exhibiting properties from compounds like polyphenols and .

Identification Challenges

Identifying Xerocomus species presents significant challenges in the field due to their morphological variability, particularly in bruising reactions, where pores and context may turn blue, green, or remain unchanged upon injury, leading to confusion with other boletes that exhibit more consistent coloration changes. Cap surfaces often develop cracking or rimose-areolate patterns in maturity, mimicking species in genera like Xerocomellus or , which can expose underlying flesh and further obscure distinctions without close examination. Accurate identification frequently requires a , as Xerocomus produces olive-brown spores that help differentiate it from lookalikes with different print colors, such as the reddish-brown of some Suillellus species. Key differentiators include the dry, non-viscid cap and phylloporoid hymenophoral trama in Xerocomus, contrasting with the often viscid cap and gelatinous or boletoid trama in , though microscopic confirmation is essential for these traits. Common lookalikes include Hortiboletus, formerly part of the Xerocomus rubellus group, which features similar dry, tomentose caps but larger, irregular pores and minimal bruising, often requiring molecular analysis to distinguish due to overlapping macroscopic features. Suillellus species, such as S. queletii, pose risks as red-pored, potentially toxic mimics with stronger reddish bruising and viscid tendencies, differing from Xerocomus in pore color and attachment. Field identification tips emphasize examining stipe surface for the absence of prominent reticulation, typical in Xerocomus, versus the reticulate stipes in some , and noting pore attachment, which is adnate to slightly decurrent. For ambiguous specimens, especially in diverse habitats, molecular methods like ITS sequencing are recommended to resolve species-level uncertainties, as morphological traits alone often fail to delimit boundaries within the .

References

  1. https://fungalpedia.org/glossary/xerocomus/
  2. https://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/NamesRecord.asp?RecordID=18763
  3. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13225-014-0283-8
  4. https://mycokeys.pensoft.net/article/107935/
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10825750/
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8228305/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7453129/
  8. https://www.mushroomexpert.com/xerocomus_subtomentosus.html
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375073233_Defining_Xerocomus_sstr_Boletaceae_in_Malesia
  10. https://www.nrs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/jrnl/2011/nrs_2011_ortiz-santana_001.pdf
  11. https://boletales.com/literature/monographs-keys/
  12. https://repository.naturalis.nl/pub/531961/PERS1981011003001.pdf
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271490009_Phylogenetic_overview_of_the_Boletineae
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1878614613000676
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1754504818300886
  16. https://www.asianjournalofmycology.org/pdf/AJOM_8_1_2.pdf
  17. https://czechmycology.org/_cm/CM60104.pdf
  18. https://www.mykoweb.com/CAF/species/Xerocomus_subtomentosus.html
  19. http://www.czechmycology.org/_cm/CM60104.pdf
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Spore-of-Xerocomus-subtomentosus-JS-4134-with-bacillate-surface-ornamentation-x-24_fig1_228730549
  21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3852/12-146
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228730549_Xerocomus_sl_in_the_light_of_the_present_state_of_knowledge
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232320457_New_species_of_Xerocomus_Boletales_from_the_Guiana_Shield_with_notes_on_their_mycorrhizal_status_and_fruiting_occurrence
  24. https://www.asianjournalofmycology.org/pdf/AJOM_8_1_6.pdf
  25. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/05-0755
  26. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.13288
  27. https://boletales.com/genera/xerocomus/x-subtomentosus/
  28. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01929.x
  29. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.96.15.8534
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3134708/
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348318569_Stress_tolerance_of_Xerocomus_badius_and_its_promotion_effect_on_seed_germination_and_seedling_growth_of_annual_ryegrass_under_salt_and_drought_stresses
  32. https://phytotaxa.mapress.com/pt/article/download/phytotaxa.689.1.1/52601
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322478239_First_record_of_Xerocomus_bubalinus_in_Italy_and_the_generic_placement_of_Xerocomus_engelii_comb_nov
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1468164110604161
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257591423_The_genus_Xerocomus
  36. https://www.mycosphere.org/pdf/MC4_1_No5.pdf
  37. https://colfungi.org/taxon/urn:lsid:indexfungorum.org:names:121483
  38. https://imafungus.pensoft.net/article/144731/
  39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2005.11.013
  40. https://www.mycobank.org/page/Name%20details%20page/129479
  41. https://www.bioinfo.org.uk/html/Xerocomus_ferrugineus.htm
  42. https://czechmycology.org/_cmo/CM66203.pdf
  43. https://www.mushroomexpert.com/xerocomus_illudens.html
  44. https://www.mycosphere.org/pdf/MYCOSPHERE_14_1_24.pdf
  45. https://eattheplanet.org/xerocomus-illudens/
  46. https://www.first-nature.com/fungi/boletus-subtomentosus.php
  47. https://www.mykoweb.com/articles/EatingRawMushrooms.html
  48. https://zombiemyco.com/pages/bay-bolete-xerocomus-badius
  49. https://zombiemyco.com/pages/suede-bolete-xerocomellus-subtomentosus
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11994104/
  51. https://doi.org/10.33585/cmy.60104
  52. https://www.mushroomexpert.com/xerocomellus_chrysenteron.html
  53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0283-8
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.