Hubbry Logo
ZW sex-determination systemZW sex-determination systemMain
Open search
ZW sex-determination system
Community hub
ZW sex-determination system
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
ZW sex-determination system
ZW sex-determination system
ZW sex-determination system
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

ZW sex determination in birds (as exemplified with chickens)
Part of a series on
Sex
Biological terms
Sexual reproduction
Sexuality
Sexual system

The ZW sex-determination system is a chromosomal system that determines the sex of offspring in birds, some fish and crustaceans such as the giant river prawn, some insects (including butterflies and moths), the schistosome family of flatworms, and some reptiles, e.g. majority of snakes, lacertid lizards and monitors, including Komodo dragons. It is also present in some plants, where it has evolved independently on many occasions, characterizing at least 22% of plants with documented sex chromosomes.[1][2] The letters Z and W are used to distinguish this system from the XY sex-determination system. In the ZW system, females have a pair of dissimilar ZW chromosomes, and males have two similar ZZ chromosomes.

In contrast to the XY sex-determination system and the X0 sex-determination system, where the sperm determines the sex, in the ZW system, the ovum determines the sex of the offspring. Males are the homogametic sex (ZZ), while females are the heterogametic sex (ZW). The Z chromosome is larger and has more genes, similarly to the X chromosome in the XY system.

Significance of the ZW and XY systems

[edit]

No genes are shared between the avian ZW and mammalian XY chromosomes,[3] and, from a comparison between chicken and human, the Z chromosome appears similar to the autosomal chromosome 9 in humans. It has been proposed that the ZW and XY sex determination systems do not share an origin but that the sex chromosomes are derived from autosomal chromosomes of the common ancestor. These autosomes are thought to have evolved sex-determining loci that eventually developed into the respective sex chromosomes once the recombination between the chromosomes (X and Y or Z and W) was suppressed.[4]

The platypus, a monotreme mammal, has a system of five pairs of XY chromosomes. They form a multiple chain due to homologous regions in male meiosis and finally segregates into XXXXX-sperm and YYYYY-sperm. The bird Z-like pair shows up on opposite ends of the chain. Areas homologous to the bird Z chromosome are scattered throughout X3 and X5.[5]: fig. 5  Although the sex-determination system is not necessarily linked to that of birds and definitely not to that of therian mammals, the similarity at least allowed for the conclusion that mammals evolved sex chromosomes twice.[6] The previous report that platypus has X chromosomes similar to that of therian mammals is now considered a mistake.[7]

Bird and snake ZW are unrelated, having evolved from different autosomes.[8] However, the bird-like chromosomes of platypus may indicate that ancestors of snakes had a bird-like ZW system.[7]

Across species

[edit]

In birds

[edit]

In 2007, a time where there had not been extensive research on other organisms with the ZW sex-determination system, researchers announced that chickens' and zebra finches' sex chromosomes do not exhibit any type of chromosome-wide dosage compensation, and instead seem to dosage compensate on a gene-by-gene basis.[9][10] Specific locations on the chicken Z chromosome, such as the MHM region, are thought to exhibit regional dosage compensation, though researchers have argued that this region does not actually constitute local dosage compensation.[11][12] Further research expanded the list of birds that do not exhibit any type of chromosome-wide dosage compensation to crows and ratites, thus implying that all avian chromosomes lack chromosome-wide dosage compensation.[13][14] Both transcriptional and translational gene-specific dosage compensation have been observed in avian sex chromosomes.[15] In addition, the involvement of sex-biased miRNAs was proposed to compensate for the presence of two Z-chromosomes in male birds.[16]

It is unknown whether it might be that the presence of the W chromosome induces female features, or whether instead it is the duplication of the Z chromosome that induces male ones; unlike mammals, no birds with a double W chromosome (ZWW) or a single Z (Z0) have been satisfactorily documented. However, it is known that the removal or damage to the ovaries of female birds can lead to the development of male plumage, suggesting that female hormones repress the expression of male characteristics in birds.[17] It appears possible that either condition could cause embryonic death, or that both chromosomes could be responsible for sex selection.[18][better source needed] One possible gene that could determine sex in birds is the DMRT1 gene. Studies have shown that two copies of the gene are necessary for male sex determination.[15][19] There appears to be a lack of female-specific genes on the W chromosome, unlike the therian Y chromosome which includes several male-specific genes. The degeneration of the avian W from an ancestral Z-like chromosome, similar to Muller's ratchet for the Y, is probably driven by selection for male-advantageous genes on the Z.[20]

The ZW sex-determination system makes it possible to create sex-link chickens in which color at hatching is differentiated by sex, thus making chick-sexing an easier process.

In snakes

[edit]

Snakes' W chromosomes show different levels of decay compared to their Z chromosomes. This allows for tracking the shrinking of W chromosomes (analogous to the shrinking of Y chromosomes) by comparing across species. Mapping of specific genes reveals that the snake system is different from the bird system. It is not yet known which gene is the sex-determining one in snakes. One thing that stood out was that pythons show little signs of "W-shrinking".[8]

Boa and Python families are now known to probably have an XY sex-determination system.[21] Interest in looking into this came from female family members capable of parthenogenesis, or producing offspring without mating. In 2010 a female Boa constrictor that produced 22 female offspring in this manner was found in the wild. By then it was presumed that such a pattern was produced by WW chromosomes.[22] Python bivittatus and Boa imperator, similarly only produce female offspring; their genomes share male-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms identifiable by restriction enzyme digestion. Their chromosomal origins, however, differ: Python's XY are similar to other snakes' ZW, while Boa XY maps to microchromosomes in other snakes.[23] The female-only pattern is in contrast to the ZW Colubroidean parthenogens, which always produce male (ZZ) offspring.[24]

In moths and butterflies

[edit]

In Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies), females can have Z, ZZW, or ZZWW.[25]

In schistosomes

[edit]

The family Schistosomatidae, commonly called blood flukes, are small parasitic flatworms dwelling in the blood vessels of the bladder, liver, intestines and other organs of birds and mammals. They are the only sexually heteromorphic family among the trematode class, and depend on remaining biochemically paired in copula to complete their life cycle.[26] The heterogametic sex chromosomes in females of nine species of schistosomes were first described by geneticist Margaret Menzel and parasitologist Robert B. Short of Florida State University in 1960.[27][28] The difference in the sex chromosomes was noted during the pachytene stage of meiotic prophase.

In turtles

[edit]

Trionychidae turtles possess a ZZ-ZW sex determinate system, which originated sometime between the beginning of the Jurassic and the Early Cretaceous.[29]

In plants

[edit]

Among the approximately 5% of plant species that have separate male and female individuals (dioecious), several are known to have a ZW system of sex determination. These include pistachio, several species of strawberry such as Fragaria virginiana and Fragaria chiloensis, and several species of willow including Salix viminalis and Salix purpurea.[2][30]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

ZW sex-determination system

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The ZW sex-determination system is a genetic mechanism found in various animals and plants, characterized by female heterogamety where females possess one Z and one W sex chromosome (ZW), while males are homogametic with two Z chromosomes (ZZ). This system reverses the pattern of the more familiar XY system in mammals, in which males are the heterogametic sex (XY) and females are homogametic (XX). In the ZW system, the sex of offspring is determined by the maternal contribution: a Z chromosome from the mother results in a ZZ male, whereas a W chromosome produces a ZW female. This mechanism is widespread among certain taxa, including all birds, many reptiles (such as snakes and some ), butterflies and moths (), some , and select plants like willows (Salix), pistachios, and wild strawberries. In birds, for instance, the Z carries dosage-sensitive genes like DMRT1, which promote male gonadal development in ZZ individuals, while the W is often gene-poor and may influence female-specific traits through its absence or specific regulators. The ZW chromosomes typically originate from autosomes that acquire sex-determining genes, followed by recombination suppression that leads to their differentiation and, over evolutionary time, heteromorphism where the W becomes smaller and more degenerate than the Z. Evolutionarily, ZW systems have arisen independently multiple times and can transition with XY systems, particularly in lineages with homomorphic (similar-looking) sex chromosomes, as seen in some fish and reptiles where environmental cues like temperature can interact with genetic factors. Such transitions are driven by sexually antagonistic selection or genomic conflicts, favoring one system over the other based on factors like mating systems and the relative costs of male versus female function. Despite their prevalence in specific groups, ZW systems exhibit variability, with some species showing rapid turnover of sex-determining loci, highlighting the plasticity of sex determination across eukaryotes.

Introduction

Definition and Basics

The ZW sex-determination system is a chromosomal mechanism of genetic sex determination in which females are the heterogametic sex, carrying one Z chromosome and one W chromosome (ZW), while males are the homogametic sex, carrying two Z chromosomes (ZZ). In this system, the sex of offspring is determined by the combination of sex chromosomes contributed by the parents during fertilization. The Z and W chromosomes originated from ancestral pairs of autosomes that evolved sex-specific roles, with the Z chromosome typically larger and containing more genes, whereas the W chromosome is often smaller, heterochromatic, and gene-poor. Under the ZW system, males (ZZ) produce gametes that all carry a Z chromosome, ensuring uniform contribution from the paternal side. Females (ZW), being heterogametic, undergo meiosis to produce two equally likely types of ova: those bearing a Z chromosome and those bearing a W chromosome. When a Z-bearing sperm fertilizes a Z-bearing ovum, the result is a ZZ male; fertilization of a W-bearing ovum by a Z-bearing sperm produces a ZW female. This Mendelian inheritance pattern typically yields a 1:1 sex ratio in offspring populations, assuming no biases in gamete production or viability. Unlike purely environmental sex determination systems—such as those in certain reptiles like and crocodilians where during development influences sex regardless of —the ZW system generally operates through genetic . However, in some , environmental cues like can interact with or override the genetic sex determination, for example, causing ZZ individuals to develop as phenotypic females in the central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) at high incubation s (≥32°C). This chromosomal basis ensures that the genetic sex is fixed at fertilization and stably transmitted across generations via the heterogametic female's dual types.

Comparison to XY System

The ZW sex-determination system serves as the female-heterogametic counterpart to the more familiar XY system, where the roles of the sex chromosomes are reversed. In the XY system, males are heterogametic (XY) and females homogametic (XX), whereas in ZW, females are heterogametic (ZW) and males homogametic (ZZ). This structural analogy highlights how both systems achieve sex determination through chromosomal dimorphism, but with inverted inheritance patterns: ZZ males pass a Z chromosome to all offspring, while ZW females transmit either Z or W to produce sons or daughters, respectively. Both ZW and XY pairs are believed to have evolved independently from ancestral autosomes, with suppression of recombination leading to differentiation between the homologous and heteromorphic chromosomes. Functionally, the two systems differ in how sex is specified at the genetic level. In the XY system prevalent in mammals, the SRY gene on the acts as a dominant trigger to initiate development, overriding the default female pathway in XX individuals. By contrast, in ZW systems such as those in birds, development in ZZ individuals arises from higher dosage of Z-linked genes, without a single dominant sex-determining gene on the W chromosome; the reduced dosage in ZW s promotes the female pathway. These dosage-based mechanisms in ZW contrast with the gene-activation mode in XY, reflecting adaptations to the heterogametic sex's chromosomal imbalance. Despite superficial similarities, ZW and XY chromosomes are not homologous across major vertebrate lineages. The avian Z chromosome, for instance, shares no significant gene content with the mammalian X or Y, indicating independent evolutionary origins from different autosomal pairs. The platypus exemplifies this divergence with its multiple sex chromosomes (five X and five Y pairs in males), which include regions homologous to the bird Z but lack homology to therian mammal XY systems, suggesting a transitional or hybrid configuration in monotremes. In terms of prevalence, XY systems dominate in vertebrates, particularly among mammals, while ZW systems are more common in birds, some reptiles, and certain invertebrates. Recent evolutionary models propose that, in lineages derived from hermaphroditic ancestors, selection favors XY over ZW due to dominance effects in sex-determining alleles, contributing to the observed asymmetry.

Genetic Mechanisms

Chromosomal Structure and Inheritance

In the ZW sex-determination system, the Z chromosome is typically larger and more gene-rich compared to the W chromosome, serving as the primary carrier of essential genetic material. In birds, the Z chromosome is often acrocentric, ranking among the larger chromosomes in the karyotype, while the W chromosome is notably smaller, heterochromatic, and enriched with repetitive DNA sequences, resulting in fewer functional genes. This morphological dimorphism reflects the evolutionary differentiation between the two chromosomes, with the Z maintaining a structure conducive to higher gene density and the W undergoing progressive reduction and accumulation of non-coding elements. Inheritance in the ZW system follows a pattern where females (ZW) are heterogametic and males (ZZ) are homogametic. During female , the Z and W chromosomes pair and segregate, producing gametes that carry either a Z or a W chromosome in roughly equal proportions, ensuring the transmission of determination to offspring. In birds, this pairing involves along the ZW bivalent, though it is often error-prone with incomplete or failed in some oocytes, potentially leading to ; however, successful segregation maintains the 1:1 in progeny. In contrast, male involves two Z chromosomes that undergo normal recombination and pairing, producing only Z-bearing . The degree of heteromorphism between Z and W chromosomes varies across lineages utilizing the ZW system. In some insects, such as certain species, females may exhibit multiple W chromosomes (e.g., ZZW or ZZWW configurations), allowing for or without disrupting female development, though this increases genomic complexity. in the ZW system is rare and often deleterious; for instance, in birds, Z0 individuals (lacking a W chromosome) develop masculinized phenotypes, while ZZW triploids typically form feminized but intersexual gonads leading to sterility, and ZWW configurations can result in or embryonic lethality. These anomalies highlight the system's sensitivity to chromosomal dosage imbalances during inheritance.

Key Genes and Dosage Compensation

In the ZW sex-determination system, the primary genetic switch for male development is the DMRT1 gene, located on the Z chromosome, which functions in a dosage-dependent manner. Males (ZZ) receive two copies of DMRT1, leading to elevated expression that activates the testis differentiation pathway during early gonadal development, while females (ZW) have only one copy, resulting in lower levels that permit the default ovarian pathway. This mechanism contrasts with the XY system, where a single dominant gene like SRY on the Y chromosome triggers male development; no homolog of SRY has been identified in ZW systems across birds, reptiles, or insects. Other genes contribute to female-biased development, notably FOXL2, which is typically autosomal in ZW species like birds but can be W-linked in some reptiles. FOXL2 promotes ovarian differentiation by repressing male pathways and upregulating synthesis, acting antagonistically to DMRT1 in the "battle of the sexes" within the . In avian systems, the W-linked ASW gene has been proposed as a potential female-determining factor due to its female-specific expression in embryonic s, but subsequent studies have not confirmed it as a master regulator, suggesting it may play a supportive rather than primary role. Dosage compensation in ZW systems, particularly in birds, lacks the chromosome-wide inactivation seen in mammalian X chromosomes; instead, Z-linked genes exhibit partial, gene-specific to balance expression between sexes. In avian gonads, this involves gene-specific, local to balance expression between sexes, without global upregulation in females or downregulation in males, ensuring equitable dosage for non-sex-determining functions while preserving the sex-specific imbalance for genes like DMRT1. A 2025 study further revealed multi-layered compensation, with transcriptional upregulation in ZW females through increased transcriptional burst frequency and enhanced translational efficiency, achieving up to 80% compensation at the protein level. Experimental evidence from CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockouts in embryos demonstrates that disrupting one DMRT1 allele in ZZ individuals causes partial or complete male-to-female gonadal , with feminized testes showing reduced signaling and increased ovarian markers, underscoring DMRT1's essential role without requiring W-linked dominance.

Distribution Across Taxa

In Birds

The ZW sex-determination system is universal across all in the class Aves, with males possessing two copies of the Z chromosome (ZZ) and females being heterogametic (ZW). The Z chromosome in birds is a macrochromosome, while the W is smaller and highly degenerate. Avian genomes include numerous microchromosomes, but are distinct, and sex is genetically determined at the moment of fertilization through the inheritance of these chromosomes from the parents. Unlike mammalian XY systems, avian do not undergo global dosage compensation mechanisms to equalize between sexes; instead, Z-linked genes typically exhibit higher expression levels in males due to their double dosage. For instance, the Z-linked DMRT1, critical for gonadal differentiation, shows approximately 1.5- to 2-fold higher expression in ZZ males compared to ZW females, contributing to the initiation of testis development in males. The W chromosome in birds is highly degenerate and gene-poor, containing only a limited number of functional genes, many of which are repetitive or non-coding sequences. One notable example is FET1 (Female-Expressed Transcript 1), a W-linked gene that is upregulated in the embryonic ovaries of birds and may play a role in female-specific and gonadal development. The domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) serves as a primary for studying the avian ZW system, owing to its well-characterized and ease of experimental manipulation. In chickens, ZW s produce two types of eggs—those carrying a Z chromosome (resulting in ZZ male offspring when fertilized) or those carrying a W chromosome (resulting in ZW female offspring)—highlighting the female's role in determining offspring sex ratios. Although the ZW system is predominantly genetic in birds, rare cases of triploidy, such as ZWW individuals, have been documented in certain species like the , where they are viable into adulthood but exhibit sterility due to gonadal abnormalities. In some avian species, environmental factors can subtly influence observed sex ratios despite the underlying genetic determination; for example, variations in incubation temperature in (Coturnix japonica) have been shown to skew hatchling sex ratios through differential embryonic mortality, with higher temperatures potentially reducing male survival rates. However, such effects are secondary and do not alter the primary chromosomal basis of sex determination in birds.

In Reptiles

The ZW sex-determination system is present in various lineages, but unlike the more uniform application in birds, it exhibits considerable diversity and often interacts with environmental factors such as . In s, ZW systems have evolved independently multiple times, with the W typically appearing as a smaller, heterochromatic microchromosome that shows varying degrees of degeneration. This degeneration process, characterized by loss and accumulation of repetitive elements, progresses at different rates across taxa, influencing the system's stability. In snakes, the ZZ/ZW predominates, particularly among advanced snakes (), including families like colubrids and vipers, where the correspond to the fourth chromosomal pair. In colubrids, the W chromosome displays varying degeneration levels, with some showing homomorphic pairs and accumulation of Bkm repeats, while vipers exhibit highly differentiated, gene-poor W chromosomes with significant degeneration. Basal snakes, such as boas and pythons (Henophidia), possess more homomorphic that resemble an XY-like with minimal W degeneration, reflecting distinct evolutionary trajectories over approximately 85 million years. Turtles demonstrate ZW systems in specific groups, notably the softshell turtles (Trionychidae), where the ZZ/ZW configuration has remained stable since the period, around 105–120 million years ago. For instance, the (Pelodiscus sinensis) and the (Apalone spinifera) feature heteromorphic micro-sex chromosomes, with the Z chromosome slightly larger and containing protein-coding genes homologous to those on chromosome 15, while the W is heterochromatic and enriched in rRNA genes. The (Emys orbicularis) also possesses a ZZ/ZW system, though it coexists with influences that can alter outcomes. Among , ZW systems occur in certain families, including varanids such as monitor lizards, where are highly conserved across and often manifest as microchromosomes. The primary sex-determining in reptiles remains unidentified and is not primarily DMRT1, distinguishing these systems from those in birds; instead, novel genetic factors likely drive ZW differentiation. In many cases, the W is a small microchromosome with reduced gene content due to degeneration. Reptilian ZW systems frequently exhibit transitional dynamics, blending genetic and (TSD). For example, in some like the Australian (Amphibolurus muricatus), higher incubation temperatures can feminize genotypic ZZ males, overriding the ZW signal. , a form of , has been documented in the (Varanus komodoensis), a , where ZZ females produce ZZ male without fertilization, leveraging the ZW system to double the Z chromosome. These variations highlight the evolutionary lability of sex determination in reptiles, with multiple independent transitions between ZW and TSD observed across lineages.

In Insects

The ZW sex-determination system is prevalent in the order , encompassing and moths, where females are heterogametic (ZW) and males are homogametic (ZZ). In this system, the Z is ancestrally derived from an , while the W represents a neo-sex chromosome that has differentiated through suppression of recombination and accumulation of repetitive elements. This configuration contrasts with the more uniform diploidy seen in vertebrate ZW systems, as lepidopteran sex chromosomes can exhibit variability due to or in some lineages. Variations in chromosomal composition occur, particularly in polyploid individuals. Standard diploid females possess a single Z and one W, but triploid or higher females may exhibit configurations such as ZZW or ZZWW, while males consistently maintain ZZ. In the silkworm , a model lepidopteran, the system follows the typical ZW/ZZ pattern, but certain strains feature neo-W chromosomes with multiple W-specific copies, leading to expanded heterochromatic regions that influence sex-specific traits. Recombination is suppressed along the Z chromosome in females, promoting differentiation between Z and W and contributing to W chromosome degeneration over evolutionary time. Dosage compensation in lepidopteran ZW systems is partial and conserved across species, achieved primarily through upregulation of Z-linked genes in ZW females to balance expression with ZZ males, though overall Z expression remains reduced relative to autosomes. Primary sex determination often relies on a W-linked factor; for instance, the Feminizer (Fem) gene, encoding a piRNA precursor, resides on the W chromosome in species like B. mori and initiates female development by repressing masculinizing pathways. Representative examples highlight these dynamics in . In species, the ZW system features a degenerating W chromosome with accumulation and limited content, alongside incomplete dosage compensation where Z-linked expression is globally reduced in both sexes but equalized between them. Unlike some ZW systems in reptiles, environmental factors such as temperature do not typically override genetic sex determination in lepidopterans.

In Other Animals and Plants

The ZW sex-determination system, where females are the heterogametic sex (ZW) and males homogametic (ZZ), occurs in various non-avian, non-reptilian, and non-insect taxa, including certain flatworms, s, , and amphibians. In schistosomes, parasitic flatworms of the genus , females possess ZW chromosomes with Z-linked genes predominantly expressed in males, while the W chromosome is notably tiny and gene-poor, containing fewer than 100 genes compared to over 900 on the Z. This system contrasts with typical animal ZW patterns by showing limited differentiation and no global dosage compensation, leading to higher Z-gene expression in males. Similarly, the giant freshwater (), a decapod , exhibits a ZW/ZZ system confirmed through female-specific amplified fragment length polymorphism markers, with sex chromosomes showing partial differentiation and influencing growth dimorphism where males outgrow females. In some fish and amphibians, ZW systems appear as labile or mixed mechanisms alongside XY types, reflecting evolutionary flexibility. For instance, certain fish like Astatotilapia burtoni display polygenic sex determination incorporating ZW loci, where environmental cues can override genetic signals, resulting in variable sex ratios. Amphibians, such as frogs in the genus Odontophrynus, occasionally exhibit ZW heterogamety with homomorphic chromosomes, though these systems are rare and often transitory, coexisting with temperature-sensitive . In plants, ZW systems are less common, occurring in approximately 15% of dioecious angiosperm species, where Z and W chromosomes are often homologous with minimal differentiation compared to animal counterparts. Examples include the pistachio tree (Pistacia vera), which has ZW sex chromosomes with the W carrying female-determining genes like PiWUS, and wild strawberries ( species), where ZW-like systems involve partially differentiated chromosomes influencing floral dimorphism. Willow species in the genus demonstrate ZW heterogamety, with recent evolutionary transitions from ancestral XY systems driven by chromosomal inversions that suppress recombination and relocate sex-determining loci. These plant ZW systems lack global dosage compensation, resulting in unequal Z-gene expression between sexes, and sex is typically determined at the gametic level, with Z-bearing pollen fertilizing ovules to produce males and W-bearing ovules yielding females. Plant ZW chromosomes also exhibit frequent turnover, as seen in Salix where multiple independent shifts between XY and ZW have occurred, promoting without extensive degeneration.

Evolution and Dynamics

Evolutionary Origins and Transitions

The ZW sex-determination system has evolved independently multiple times across diverse taxa, typically arising from autosomal pairs through the suppression of recombination and the differentiation of one chromosome into the sex-limited W. In birds, for instance, the Z chromosome is derived from an ancestral homologous to parts of , marking a distinct evolutionary origin unrelated to the mammalian XY system. This independent emergence is evident in the lack of homology between avian ZW chromosomes and mammalian XY chromosomes, as comparative genomic analyses show they originated from different autosomal regions. Similarly, in other lineages, ZW systems have formed de novo from autosomes, underscoring their polyphyletic nature rather than a single conserved origin. Transitions between ZW and XY systems, or vice versa, have occurred repeatedly in , often involving shifts in the heterogametic sex through mechanisms like recombination suppression on homologous chromosomes. In and amphibians, multiple examples document such reversals, where genetic sex determination toggles between male (XY) and female (ZW) heterogamy, sometimes coexisting with environmental cues.01996-8) A recent case in willows (Salix spp.) illustrates a homologous transition from an XY to a ZW system, driven by the expansion of a non-recombining region on , which suppressed recombination and inverted the sex-determining role. These shifts highlight the labile nature of , facilitated by genetic inversions or fusions that alter dosage or dominance at sex-determining loci.01996-8) ZW systems appear less stable over evolutionary time compared to XY systems, with theoretical models indicating that selection often favors XY due to differences in allele dominance. When dioecy evolves from hermaphroditism, mutations at the sex-determining locus are more likely to fix as recessive alleles on the Y chromosome (favoring male heterogamy) than as dominant alleles on the W (favoring female heterogamy), leading to the observed prevalence of XY systems. In reptiles, the ancestral state is likely temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD), with ZW systems evolving secondarily in certain lineages through the co-option of thermal sensitivity genes into genetic control. For insects, many ZW systems involve neo-sex chromosomes, where autosomes are recruited as novel W chromosomes via fusions or inversions, contributing to the high turnover observed in lepidopterans and other orders.

W Chromosome Degeneration and Sex Reversal

In the ZW sex-determination system, the W chromosome undergoes progressive degeneration following the evolutionary suppression of recombination with the Z chromosome, which exposes it to the accumulation of deleterious mutations and selective pressures without the corrective benefits of genetic exchange. This process results in gene loss, accumulation, and overall reduction in functional content, as the W becomes increasingly specialized and diminished over time. In birds, for instance, the W chromosome has retained only about 4.2% of its ancestral gene content in older lineages, contrasting sharply with the Z chromosome, which maintains thousands of genes essential for various cellular functions. This degeneration is driven by mechanisms such as and background selection, where harmful alleles fixate more readily in the absence of recombination. The rate of W chromosome degeneration varies significantly across taxa, influenced by factors like generation time, effective population size, and selective constraints. In avian species, degeneration proceeds rapidly, leading to a highly inert W chromosome that is gene-poor and predominantly heterochromatic, often resulting in dosage imbalances for Z-linked genes between ZZ males and ZW females. In contrast, degeneration is slower in certain reptiles, such as snakes, where the W retains more genes and exhibits less extensive heterochromatinization, potentially due to occasional recombination events or stronger purifying selection. Similarly, in plants with ZW-like systems, such as some species in the genus Silene, the process is retarded by haploid purifying selection during the gametophyte phase, allowing greater gene retention compared to animal systems. These differences highlight how ecological and genomic contexts modulate the pace of decay, with faster rates generally exacerbating sex-specific genetic disparities. W chromosome degeneration contributes to phenotypic variations, including , where genetic sex is overridden by chromosomal anomalies or environmental cues, leading to discordance between and . In birds, such as ZZW karyotypes often produces feminized or phenotypes despite the extra Z chromosome, while Z0 individuals (with a single Z and no W) develop as males, underscoring the interplay between Z dosage (e.g., via DMRT1) and potential W-specific factors in sex differentiation. These reversals can result in characteristics or reduced fertility, as seen in ZZW birds with impaired ovarian function. In reptiles, environmental triggers like temperature can induce reversal independently of degeneration; for example, in central bearded dragons ( vitticeps), high incubation temperatures convert genotypic ZZ males into phenotypic females, overriding the ZW system. Such temperature-induced ZZ females in bearded dragons exhibit enhanced compared to genetic ZW females and can reproduce parthenogenetically, producing ZZ that may themselves develop as females under prolonged high temperatures, thereby facilitating population persistence in warming climates. This parthenogenetic capability in reversed individuals demonstrates how W degeneration and can interact with environmental pressures to promote reproductive flexibility, though it often comes at the cost of and long-term viability. Overall, these phenomena reveal the dynamic instability of ZW systems, where degeneration amplifies susceptibility to reversals and their downstream effects on fitness.30824-1)

Significance

Functional and Evolutionary Implications

The ZW sex-determination system, with its female heterogamety, imposes a higher mutational load on the W chromosome due to reduced recombination and progressive degeneration, leading to female-specific genetic burdens that can manifest in traits such as ornamentation or reproductive behaviors in birds. This load arises because the W chromosome serves as a repository for endogenous retroviruses and other repetitive elements that accumulate deleterious mutations, potentially influencing female-biased expression patterns without the strong recombination suppression observed on the Y chromosome in XY systems. Unlike the XY system, where male heterogamety concentrates mutation accumulation in the non-recombining Y, the ZW configuration exposes females to these effects, altering ecological dynamics like mate choice and survival in species with sexual dimorphism. Evolutionarily, ZW systems exhibit faster sex chromosome turnover than the more stable XY systems prevalent in mammals, as the hemizygous W chromosome rapidly accumulates incompatible mutations that favor shifts to new sex-determining loci to mitigate . This dynamism is evident in birds, where Z-linked inversions contribute to by reducing hybrid viability and enhancing , thereby accelerating macroevolutionary divergence compared to autosomal barriers. In , ZW heterogamety aids the of by facilitating transitions from hermaphroditism through flexible genetic mechanisms, such as the linkage of sex-determining genes like ARR17 on the W chromosome, which promote separate sexes and . Animal ZW systems also show elevated distortion relative to XY counterparts, often driven by segregation biases that invade under male-biased conditions and stabilize female heterogamety, influencing and reproductive strategies. These functional and evolutionary features have broader implications for , particularly in conservation, where ZW birds face risks of sex-biased extinctions due to differential survival rates that skew adult sex ratios and compromise population viability in fragmented habitats. The degeneration of chromosome further amplifies vulnerabilities in females, heightening susceptibility to environmental stressors in with already imbalanced dynamics.

Research Gaps and Future Directions

Despite significant advances in understanding the ZW sex-determination system, the identification of master sex-determining (MSD) genes remains elusive in many reptilian lineages, including snakes, where post-2020 genomic studies have confirmed that no single analogous to DMRT1 in birds or SRY in mammals dominates the process. In reptiles exhibiting ZW systems, such as certain and , differentiation of often involves polygenic mechanisms or environmental influences rather than a conserved MSD, highlighting a critical gap in pinpointing the primary genetic triggers. This uncertainty is compounded by the independent evolution of ZW systems across squamate reptiles, where recent analyses of assemblies reveal varied degrees of differentiation without a unifying master regulator. Limited data persist on the prevalence and transitions of ZW systems in basal lineages, such as , where genetic sex determination frequently shifts between ZW, XY, and temperature-dependent modes. For instance, studies on perciform like the combtail demonstrate ZZ/ZW differentiation influenced by repetitive DNA elements, but comprehensive mapping of these transitions in early-diverging teleosts remains incomplete, impeding evolutionary reconstructions. Similarly, ZW systems, particularly in polyploid species like certain , lack detailed genetic resolution on how levels interact with dynamics, leaving gaps in understanding hybrid or multiple-origin scenarios. Recent discoveries underscore areas where knowledge has evolved rapidly, such as the 2023 documentation of an XY-to-ZW transition in willows (Salix), where genomic sequencing revealed the W chromosome's derivation from the ancestral X through gene loss and suppression, challenging prior models of plant sex evolution. A 2024 theoretical model further explains the observed prevalence of XY over ZW systems in dioecious species derived from hermaphroditism, attributing it to selection on dominance at sex-determining loci, yet empirical validation across ZW-dominant taxa like reptiles remains sparse. Looking ahead, long-read sequencing technologies offer promise for reconstructing degenerated W chromosomes and investigating potential recovery mechanisms, as demonstrated in recent gap-free assemblies of sex chromosomes in and that enable finer resolution of heteromorphic regions. CRISPR-based holds potential for experimental manipulation of sex reversals in ZW model organisms, allowing direct testing of candidate genes and dosage effects, though applications in non-model species are nascent. In reptiles like with hybrid ZW and temperature-sensitive systems, future research must address climate change impacts, as rising temperatures could skew sex ratios and accelerate transitions, necessitating integrated genomic and ecological modeling. Challenges include ethical constraints on using avian models for invasive genetic studies, which limit functional validations of ZW mechanisms, and the overrepresentation of birds and insects in datasets, underscoring the need for broader taxonomic sampling across reptiles, fish, and plants to capture system diversity. Interdisciplinary efforts combining high-throughput with field-based observations will be essential to bridge these gaps and predict evolutionary trajectories under environmental pressures.

References

  1. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001899
  2. https://www.hudsonalpha.org/sex-determination-the-x-y-zs-of-sex-chromosomes/
  3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17675857/
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-42880-5
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16950100/
  6. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2406305121
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC544544/
  8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030021
  9. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(06)01996-8
  10. https://karger.com/sxd/article/15/1-3/148/820653/Temperature-Induced-Sex-Reversal-in-Reptiles
  11. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822%2806%2901996-8
  12. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.95.14.8147
  13. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0608879103
  14. https://www.nature.com/articles/hdy2011106
  15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19963300/
  16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK585705/
  17. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r243
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2413164/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11459199/
  20. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/dvg.22382
  21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10628664
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/sex-chromosome
  23. https://karger.com/cgr/article/150/2/128/62487/The-Chromosomes-of-Birds-during-Meiosis
  24. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1002560
  25. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/mrd.21369
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368569333_Deviations_in_the_ZA_ratio_disrupt_sexual_development_in_the_eri_silkmoth_Samia_cynthia_ricini
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10179413
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3440977/
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33658372/
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19710650/
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982206019968
  32. https://karger.com/sxd/article/16/2-3/184/827012/The-Genetics-and-Biology-of-FOXL2
  33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11180828/
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11250153/
  35. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-023-03055-z
  36. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64817-w
  37. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2020909118
  38. https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1096/fj.202100902R
  39. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-024-02230-5
  40. https://karger.com/cgr/article/122/2/150/61202/Synteny-conservation-of-the-Z-chromosome-in-14
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7599627/
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378111924008874
  43. https://www.intechopen.com/books/gene-expression-and-phenotypic-traits/specific-features-of-sex-determination-in-birds-on-the-example-of-em-gallus-gallus-em-domesticus
  44. https://ijdb.ehu.eus/article/170319cs
  45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21934026/
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21934026
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2918650/
  48. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-69349-5
  49. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep42150
  50. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/z89-182
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6781170/
  52. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-33170-y
  53. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163600
  54. https://karger.com/sxd/article/1/6/332/296218/Sex-Chromosomes-and-Sex-Determination-in
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259881902_Lepidopteran_Sex_Determination_A_Cascade_of_Surprises
  56. https://www.nature.com/articles/6800700
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28957502/
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4607515/
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6089595/
  60. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.13.456314v1
  61. https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0002402
  62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23763724/
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468550X2200003X
  64. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-016-3177-1
  65. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18996493/
  66. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jez.2776
  67. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.580488/full
  68. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-022-02769-w
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8935305/
  70. https://academic.oup.com/evlett/article/8/4/467/7636794
  71. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=50703
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10628195/
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214574525000811
  74. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-66470-7
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7601716/
  76. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nph.13497
  77. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2020.0093
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10179413/
  79. https://researchmgt.monash.edu/ws/portalfiles/portal/52959943/20833801_oa.pdf
  80. https://phys.org/news/2021-04-bearded-dragon-embryos-females-sex.html
  81. https://karger.com/sxd/article/10/5-6/279/296441/Sex-Reversal-in-Reptiles-Reproductive-Oddity-or
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4920310/
  83. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2020.0186
  84. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/18/11/2010/1063066
  85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6900093/
  86. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29443419/
  87. https://www.nature.com/articles/hdy2009104
  88. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263430815_Sex-biased_survival_predicts_adult_sex_ratio_variation_in_wild_birds
  89. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202503.1230/v1
  90. https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1094902
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9486513/
  92. https://academic.oup.com/dnaresearch/article/29/4/dsac028/6647841
  93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389942177_Repetitive_DNAs_and_differentiation_of_the_ZZZW_sex_chromosome_system_in_the_combtail_fish_Belontia_hasselti_Perciformes_Osphronemidae
  94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590346222003443
  95. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/nph.19744
  96. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-50992-9
  97. https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00633/74519/74347.pdf
  98. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2020.0426
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8000587/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.