Hubbry Logo
3 Faces3 FacesMain
Open search
3 Faces
Community hub
3 Faces
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
3 Faces
3 Faces
from Wikipedia

3 Faces
French theatrical poster
Directed byJafar Panahi
Written byJafar Panahi
Nader Saeivar
StarringBehnaz Jafari
Jafar Panahi
Marziyeh Rezaei
Maedeh Erteghaei
CinematographyAmin Jafari
Edited byMastaneh Mohajer
Panah Panahi
Production
company
Jafar Panahi Film Production
Distributed byMemento Films Distribution (France)
Release date
  • 12 May 2018 (2018-05-12) (Cannes)
Running time
100 minutes
CountryIran
LanguagesPersian
Azerbaijani

3 Faces (Persian: Se rokh – سه رخ, French: Trois visages) is a 2018 Iranian drama film directed by Jafar Panahi and starring Behnaz Jafari and Panahi as themselves. The film was produced despite a ban on filmmaking imposed on Panahi. It was selected to compete for the Palme d'Or at the 2018 Cannes Film Festival, winning the award for Best Screenplay.

Plot

[edit]

Behnaz Jafari, a popular Iranian actress, searches for a young girl (Marziyeh) in northwestern Iran with her friend Jafar Panahi, a director, after seeing a video of the girl asking for help to leave her conservative family.

The film takes the form of a road movie, much of it taking place in and around Panahi's SUV. Several whimsical encounters take place on the trip, with local characters and traditions. Marziyeh, ostracised from the village, is eventually discovered living with another older woman, Shahrzad, who lives as a recluse. Shahzad, like Jafari, was a famous real-life Iranian actress; she was ostracised after the Iranian Revolution, following years of mistreatment by male directors.[1][2]

Cast

[edit]

Production

[edit]

3 Faces was Jafar Panahi's fourth film made under his 20-year filmmaking ban imposed by the government of Iran,[1] after This Is Not a Film, Closed Curtain, and Taxi. It is filmed in a remote Turkish (Azerbaijani) speaking part of Iran where Panahi's parents hail from.[1]

Of necessity the filming is often 'rough and ready', including an opening sequence filmed using a hand held mobile phone.[1]

Reception

[edit]

Critical response

[edit]

3 Faces has an approval rating of 98% on review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, based on 102 reviews, and an average rating of 7.9/10. The website's critical consensus states: "Observational, insightful, and ultimately powerful, 3 Faces adds another quietly thought-provoking chapter to writer-director Jafar Panahi's filmography".[3] Metacritic assigned the film a weighted average score of 78 out of 100, based on 18 critics, indicating generally favourable reviews.[4]

Variety describes the film as an "absorbing paradox", where Panahi shifts the emphasis onto "a whole underclass of Iranian womanhood" in "what feels like his freest film" and "most elusive" since his film-making ban. The review says the film is a "quietly fierce act of cinematic defiance."[1]

The Los Angeles Times described the film as a "multi-generational portrait" with "its quotidian poetry, its deep reserves of mystery and its rich rewards for an open-hearted audience".[5]

Awards and recognition

[edit]

The film was selected to compete for the Palme d'Or at the 2018 Cannes Film Festival.[6][7] At Cannes, Panahi and co-writer Nader Saeivar won the award for Best Screenplay.[8]

The film also won the Golden Orange at the Antalya Golden Orange Film Festival,[9] the Douglas Sirk Award at the Hamburg Film Festival,[10] and the Leon Cakoff Prize at the São Paulo International Film Festival[11]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
(Persian: سه رخ, Se rokh) is a 2018 Iranian drama film written, directed, and produced by . Starring actress Behnaz Jafari and Panahi as fictionalized versions of themselves, the film centers on their journey to a rural village following a young woman's after her family forbids her pursuit of . It premiered in competition at the , where Panahi received the Best Screenplay Award. The narrative unfolds as a road movie, blending documentary-like elements with fiction to examine the constraints on women in conservative Iranian society, particularly those aspiring to careers in cinema. Through encounters representing three generations of women connected to the film industry, 3 Faces highlights tensions between personal ambition, familial expectations, and cultural traditions. Critics praised its subtle defiance and humanistic portrayal, earning a 98% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on over 100 reviews. Panahi's creation of the film underscores its defining controversy: produced clandestinely despite a 20-year ban on imposed by Iranian authorities in 2010 following his conviction for against the state. This marks the fourth such unauthorized feature by Panahi since the ban, reflecting his persistent challenge to censorship through cinema verité-style works that evade official permits. The film's reception at amplified international attention to Panahi's plight, positioning 3 Faces as both artistic achievement and act of resistance.

Film Summary

Synopsis

(Persian: Se rokh) is a Iranian film written, directed, and produced by , who also appears as himself. The story unfolds as a narrative initiated when Behnaz Jafari receives a distressing smartphone video from a young woman named Marziyeh Rezaei, depicting her staging a in a remote after her conservative family forbids her pursuit of studies at a conservatory. Jafari, moved by Marziyeh's plea for support in defying familial and traditional barriers to her artistic ambitions, recruits Panahi to drive with her from to Marziyeh's isolated village in rural northwestern to investigate her fate and circumstances. Along the journey, Panahi and Jafari interact with locals, including villagers who share anecdotes about daily life under patriarchal customs and encounters with animals, while detouring to the grave of an elderly pre-1979 Islamic Revolution actress whose career was curtailed by societal shifts, symbolizing lost generations of women in Iranian cinema. Upon reaching the village, they find Marziyeh alive but under intense family pressure, leading to tense confrontations with her relatives, including her mother and brother, who prioritize traditional roles over her dreams. The film contrasts the "three faces" of womanhood in cinema—the historical figure, the contemporary star (Jafari), and the aspiring youth (Marziyeh)—amid explorations of resilience, generational divides, and the constraints imposed by rural conservatism. The narrative resolves through understated acts of solidarity and quiet defiance, emphasizing personal agency without overt confrontation.

Cast and Roles

Behnaz Jafari stars as a fictionalized version of herself, an established Iranian actress who receives a distressing video message from a young aspiring performer and embarks on a journey to a remote village to investigate. , the film's director, portrays a semi-autobiographical character based on himself, a filmmaker banned from working who accompanies Jafari on the trip and reflects on themes of artistic aspiration amid societal constraints. The narrative centers on Marziyeh Rezaei as Marziyeh, a teenage girl from a conservative rural family who dreams of pursuing acting despite familial opposition, prompting the central conflict after her apparent suicide attempt via video plea. Maedeh Erteghaei plays Maedeh, Marziyeh's friend and fellow aspiring actress whose own earlier suicide attempt ties into the film's exploration of thwarted ambitions. Supporting roles include Narges Delaram as Marziyeh's mother, embodying traditional resistance to the daughters' dreams, and local non-professional villagers who contribute to the authentic depiction of rural Iranian life.
ActorRole Description
Behnaz JafariEstablished actress (as herself)
Filmmaker (as himself)
Marziyeh RezaeiAspiring young actress, Marziyeh
Maedeh ErteghaeiMarziyeh's friend, Maedeh
Narges DelaramMarziyeh's mother
Panahi's use of largely non-professional performers alongside himself and Jafari underscores the film's documentary-like realism, drawing from real-life inspirations such as an actual video plea that motivated the story. This approach highlights contrasts between urban artistic elites and rural traditionalism, with roles evolving organically through rather than scripted .

Production Process

Development and Conceptualization

Jafar Panahi developed 3 Faces amid his 2010 ban on filmmaking, drawing from real-life interactions and media reports on aspiring artists in Iran. The core idea originated from a concerning Instagram message Panahi received, coupled with contemporaneous newspaper accounts of a young woman who died by suicide after her family forbade her from pursuing cinema. Panahi envisioned himself receiving a video of such an act via social media and pondered his reaction, which crystallized into the film's opening premise of actress Behnaz Jafari discovering a rural girl's apparent suicide video addressed to Panahi. Conceptually, the film serves as a reflection on Iranian cinema's evolution and constraints, structured around three generations of women in acting—exemplified by a pre-revolutionary star, Jafari as a contemporary figure, and the young villager aspiring to join them—to highlight persistent patriarchal and cultural impediments to women's artistic ambitions. Panahi framed this through a metaphorical "narrow and winding road," evoking the limited opportunities in conservative rural areas, particularly in Azeri-speaking regions where principal photography occurred across three villages. The script was composed in detail prior to production, allowing flexibility for on-set refinements to capture authentic interactions, with emphasis shifted toward exterior scenes using a discreet loaned from Panahi's daughter—facilitating covert filming under surveillance risks. This approach marked a deliberate from Panahi's prior confined, indoor narratives like Closed Curtain (), prioritizing mobility and real-world immersion while subverting his ban through non-professional casts and minimal crews.

Filming and Logistical Challenges

The production of 3 Faces was conducted under severe constraints imposed by Jafar Panahi's 20-year ban on filmmaking, enacted by Iranian authorities in 2010 following his arrest for alleged propaganda activities. This prohibition barred Panahi from obtaining official permits, directing, writing scripts, or traveling abroad, necessitating entirely clandestine operations to evade detection and potential seizure of equipment or arrest. As the fourth feature Panahi completed in defiance of the ban, the film relied on minimal infrastructure, with Panahi himself operating the camera and incorporating improvisational elements from real-life interactions to reduce the footprint of the shoot. Filming took place in remote rural villages in Miyaneh County, , in Azerbaijani-speaking regions of northwest , selected for their sparse population and isolation, which minimized the risk of interference from monitors. These locations, involving craggy mountain roads and traditional communities, presented logistical hurdles such as navigating unpaved terrain with limited crew vehicles and coordinating with non-professional local performers unaccustomed to cinema. The road-trip structure amplified these issues, requiring discreet travel between three specific villages without drawing attention, while cultural sensitivities around gender roles and village customs—central to the narrative—demanded on-site adaptations rather than pre-planned setups. Panahi employed a small, trusted team—typically comprising a and sound technician—to facilitate quick, low-profile shoots, often completing scenes in two or three takes after meticulous pre-planning. This approach, honed across his banned films, avoided large equipment transports and relied on digital formats for portability, though it heightened vulnerability to interruptions in areas with poor . No major disruptions were reported during in 2017, but the pervasive threat of regime enforcement underscored the production's precariousness, with the final edit smuggled out of for its 2018 Cannes premiere.

Thematic Analysis

Core Themes and Symbolism

The film 3 Faces examines the aspirations of Iranian women across three generations, highlighting their encounters with patriarchal constraints in both rural and urban contexts. The narrative centers on a young aspiring , Marziyeh Rezaei, who faces familial opposition to her dreams of attending , contrasting with the established career of actress Behnaz Jafari and the legacy of a pre-revolutionary performer, Shahrzad. This structure underscores themes of resilience amid misogynistic traditions, where women's self-expression through art clashes with expectations of domesticity and conformity. Symbolically, the titular "three faces" represent evolving stages of female experience in post-revolutionary : Shahrzad embodies a bygone era of relative artistic freedom before , Jafari signifies contemporary compromises within a censored industry, and Marziyeh projects defiant youthful hope tempered by potential tragedy, as evidenced by her staged suicide video pleading for validation. The road trip from to rural serves as a for probing societal hypocrisies, moving from modern constraints to traditional villages where customs prioritize male —illustrated by a farmer's reverence for an injured bull's potency as a measure of —while exposing the limits on women's . Panahi's use of impromptu footage further symbolizes grassroots defiance against institutional bans on , blurring and to mirror the fragmented pursuit of truth under . Broader themes include the tension between and , with rural life depicted as a repository of and that both preserves and enforces roles, as seen in villagers' initial hostility toward outsiders probing local graves and ambitions. The film critiques how cinema itself becomes a vehicle for subtle resistance, drawing on Panahi's real-life ban to allegorize the stifled voices of Iranian women, whose determination persists despite systemic barriers.

Stylistic Elements and Narrative Techniques

"3 Faces" employs a minimalist stylistic approach characteristic of Jafar Panahi's post-ban filmmaking, utilizing digital video capture with a small crew to evoke cinéma vérité aesthetics, eschewing elaborate production designs in favor of unadorned rural Iranian landscapes and everyday interactions. The cinematography features straightforward, static or gently moving shots without reliance on long takes or complex angles, prioritizing narrative clarity and emotional authenticity over visual flourish, which aligns with the film's low-budget constraints imposed by Panahi's government prohibition on formal filmmaking. This technique fosters a sense of immediacy, as seen in the opening sequence's integration of smartphone footage shot in portrait orientation, simulating a desperate plea from the young protagonist and blurring the boundaries between amateur recording and professional cinema. Narratively, the film adopts a structure, with Panahi—portraying a version of himself—and Behnaz Jafari embarking on an impromptu journey from urban into remote villages, encountering vignettes that layer personal aspirations against patriarchal traditions. This episodic progression, centered on three archetypal female figures—a suicidal aspiring , a reclusive former star, and an elderly woman symbolizing lost —builds through accumulation of encounters rather than linear plot escalation, allowing social observations to emerge organically from dialogue and observed behaviors. Panahi's technique further incorporates meta-elements, such as self-reflexivity on cinema's role in Iranian society, by having real-life figures like Jafari interact in semi-improvised scenes that question the ethics of representation and the filmmaker's intrusive gaze, thereby challenging the fiction-documentary divide. The narrative restraint—marked by understated pacing and open-ended resolutions—mirrors the characters' constrained lives, using spatial mobility along winding roads as a counterpoint to thematic entrapment, a departure from the confined interiors of Panahi's prior banned works like "Taxi" (2015). This approach not only circumvents production bans through guerrilla methods but also underscores causal links between individual agency and systemic repression, rendered through empathetic, non-didactic observation.

Political Context

Jafar Panahi's Government Ban

In March 2010, Iranian filmmaker was arrested during a raid on his apartment by security forces, amid accusations of planning a documentary critical of the disputed 2009 presidential election and supporting opposition protests known as the Green Movement. The arrest followed Panahi's public attendance at the funeral of a protester killed during the unrest and prior brief detention in July 2009 at a mourning gathering for Neda Agha-Soltan, a symbol of the protests. In December 2010, Panahi was convicted by an Iranian court of "propaganda against the system," a charge stemming from his alleged intent to produce anti-government content without official permission. He received a six-year prison sentence—initially enforced with periods of incarceration and house arrest—and a 20-year prohibition on directing, writing, or producing films, as well as bans on granting interviews to foreign media and leaving the country. The Tehran appeals court upheld the verdict on October 15, 2011, reinforcing the restrictions despite international outcry from filmmakers and human rights groups decrying the move as an effort to suppress dissent in Iran's tightly controlled cinema sector. Despite the ban, Panahi persisted in filmmaking through clandestine methods, producing unauthorized works that evaded official oversight, including This Is Not a Film (2011), Closed Curtain (2013), Taxi (2015), and 3 Faces (2018). For 3 Faces, shot in rural northern Iran without permits, Panahi employed minimal crews and non-professional actors to document a meta-narrative on artistic aspiration amid societal constraints, smuggling the footage abroad for its Cannes premiere in May 2018. This defiance highlighted the ban's ineffectiveness against determined creators but exposed Panahi to risks of further enforcement, including the suspended prison term, within Iran's broader pattern of censoring content deemed threatening to regime authority. The filmmaking prohibition remained in place until April 2023, when it was lifted following legal appeals and Panahi's temporary imprisonment earlier that year over unrelated protest-related charges.

Broader Censorship in Iranian Cinema

The Iranian film industry operates under stringent state control enforced by the and Islamic Guidance (MCIG), which requires all domestic productions to obtain a production permit prior to filming and a separate screening permit before public release. This dual-approval process begins with submission of a completed to the MCIG's examination commission, where scripts are scrutinized for alignment with Islamic principles, , and moral standards as defined by the regime. Non-compliance results in outright bans, restrictions on domestic or international screenings, or prohibitions on filmmakers participating in future projects. Censorship guidelines prohibit depictions that challenge religious orthodoxy, promote Western cultural influences, or portray , with women required to wear full , avoid excessive makeup, and refrain from showing skin or hair on screen; similar restrictions apply to male actors regarding violence or moral ambiguity. Films critiquing government policies, ethnic minorities, or familial structures in ways deemed subversive are routinely rejected, fostering a landscape where aligned with state ideology receives preferential treatment. These rules, rooted in post-1979 Islamic Revolution policies, extend to editing foreign imports, such as cropping scenes or to alter narratives conflicting with values. The pervasive threat of denial has induced widespread self-censorship among filmmakers, who preemptively avoid politically sensitive or artistically bold subjects to secure approvals and mitigate financial losses from rejected projects. This practice limits thematic diversity, channeling creativity into allegorical or indirect storytelling, though it has not eradicated dissent entirely—leading to an underground cinema of unauthorized films smuggled abroad for international festivals. As of October 2025, industry unions have escalated collective protests against the system, demanding its abolition amid ongoing stagnation in production volumes. Such controls, while stifling overt criticism, have paradoxically honed techniques of subtle resistance, enabling some Iranian works to achieve global acclaim despite domestic barriers.

Release and Recognition

Premiere and International Distribution

3 Faces had its world premiere in the Competition section of the on May 12, 2018. The film was handled for world sales by Paris-based , which secured distribution deals across approximately 20 territories prior to the festival opening. These pre-sales reflected strong international interest in Jafar Panahi's work despite his ongoing domestic restrictions. In , Memento Films acquired theatrical rights ahead of the Cannes debut. For the , Kino Lorber purchased distribution rights in August 2018, following the film's Cannes reception, and released it theatrically on March 8, 2019. In the , New Wave Films handled distribution, with a theatrical release on March 29, 2019. Additional deals included through Madman Entertainment, contributing to the film's availability in select markets outside , where no official release occurred due to Panahi's filmmaking ban.

Awards and Festival Response

3 Faces had its world premiere in the Official Competition section of the 71st on May 17, 2018, where it competed for the . The film received the Best Screenplay Award (ex aequo), shared with for Rodin, presented to Jafar Panahi's daughter Solmaz Panahi on his behalf due to his travel ban. The jury, chaired by , recognized the screenplay's subtle exploration of women's aspirations amid cultural constraints, with the award announced by Robert Guédiguian and . Festival critics praised its minimalist style and humanist themes, noting it as a testament to Panahi's resilience under Iran's filmmaking restrictions. Following Cannes, 3 Faces screened at the on October 9, , where Panahi issued a statement affirming his commitment to cinema despite the ban, emphasizing the film's focus on rural Iranian women's struggles. It also competed at the , winning the Golden Orange Award for Panahi on October 13, , highlighting its appeal in Turkish audiences for addressing patriarchal oppression. Additional selections included the and New Zealand International Film Festival in –2019, where programmers lauded its low-key narrative as a sly critique of . The film's festival trajectory underscored international solidarity with Panahi, with venues like using the platform to spotlight Iran's suppression of dissident artists; however, it did not secure further major competitive prizes beyond screenplay honors, reflecting juries' appreciation for its restraint over dramatic flair. Responses often highlighted the work's authenticity, derived from non-professional and improvised rural settings, positioning it as a quiet rather than overt .

Critical and Cultural Reception

Reviews and Interpretations

"3 Faces" received widespread critical acclaim, earning a 98% approval rating on based on 104 reviews, with critics praising its subtle exploration of Iranian societal constraints. awarded it 3.5 out of 4 stars, commending Panahi's seamless fusion of documentary and narrative elements to depict rural Iran's quiet tensions, though noting it falls short of his strongest works like "" (2015). described the film as "calm, modest – and inscrutable," highlighting its oblique mysteries and humane portrayal of rural-urban divides, while drawing parallels to Abbas Kiarostami's meditative style in films such as "" (1997). Interpretations frequently center on the film's portrayal of generational female aspirations clashing with patriarchal traditions, symbolized by the three titular faces representing past, present, and future Iranian womanhood in cinema. The Los Angeles Times viewed it as an examination of "female repression and rebellion," with the young villager Marziyeh Rezaei's video plea embodying resistance against familial and cultural barriers to artistic pursuit. Reviewers interpreted Panahi's road journey as a meta-commentary on cinema's power to challenge conservatism, particularly in rural areas where acting—especially for women—is stigmatized as dishonorable. Panahi's own presence in the film prompted readings of it as a veiled for his banned status, underscoring cinema's resilience amid authoritarian curbs, though some critics, like those in , found its political undertones deliberately understated to evade overt confrontation. The Playlist interpreted the narrative as a humanist critique of , focusing on women's incremental agency in a society enforcing and obedience. Spirituality & Practice emphasized the "resiliency of the feminine spirit," seeing the film's optimistic close—two women walking freely—as a symbol of enduring hope against oppression. These analyses align with Panahi's oeuvre, which consistently probes existential and social limits without , prioritizing observational nuance over explicit .

Controversies and Debates

Critics have debated the interpretive ambiguity of 3 Faces, noting its deliberate elusiveness in resolving key mysteries, such as the authenticity of the opening suicide video sent by aspiring actress Marziyeh Rezaei to Behnaz Jafari, which may be a staged plea for help rather than a genuine act of despair driven by familial opposition to her ambitions. This blurring of fiction and reality, a hallmark of Jafar Panahi's post-ban work, invites questions about whether the film prioritizes emotional resonance over narrative clarity, with some viewing its open-ended structure as a strength that mirrors the constraints of rural Iranian life, while others find it inscrutable and less politically direct than Panahi's earlier efforts like Taxi Tehran. A central point of contention lies in the 's portrayal of gender dynamics across three generations of women—young Marziyeh, established actress Jafari, and elderly rural performer Shahrazad—who grapple with patriarchal restrictions that limit female agency, such as enforced domesticity and suspicion toward women in public roles. Proponents argue it subtly indicts traditional values by contrasting urban artistic freedom with village conservatism, where Marziyeh's rebellion against family prohibitions symbolizes broader resistance to , evidenced by scenes of ritualistic symbolizing suppressed aspirations. Detractors, however, question if Panahi's and understated approach adequately challenge systemic or merely romanticize it through a Kiarostami-influenced meditative lens, potentially diluting urgency in favor of aesthetic poise. The film's political undertones have sparked discussion on its coded critique of Iranian society under , with Panahi's on-screen presence alluding to his own ban without overt confrontation, leading some to praise its restraint as a strategy that embeds dissent in everyday encounters, such as quirky rural interactions highlighting small-minded authority. Others contend this subtlety risks understating the regime's role in perpetuating and cultural stagnation, interpreting the hopeful yet ambiguous village escape at the close as either a for incremental progress or an evasion of harsher realities faced by women in conservative regions. These debates underscore 3 Faces' position as a modest yet rewarding entry in Panahi's clandestine oeuvre, balancing personal storytelling with societal observation.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.