Hubbry Logo
B3 (classification)B3 (classification)Main
Open search
B3 (classification)
Community hub
B3 (classification)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
B3 (classification)
B3 (classification)
B3 (classification)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
B3 classified Australian goalball player Jennifer Blow

B3 is a medical based Paralympic classification for blind sport. Competitors in this classification have partial sight, with visual acuity from 2/60 to 6/60. It is used by a number of blind sports including para-alpine skiing, para-Nordic skiing, blind cricket, blind golf, five-a-side football, goalball and judo. Some other sports, including adaptive rowing, athletics and swimming, have equivalents to this class.

The B3 classification was first created by the IBSA in the 1970s, and has largely remained unchanged since despite an effort by the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) to move towards a more functional and evidence-based classification system. Classification is often handled on the international level by the International Blind Sports Association (IBSA) although it is also handled by national sport federations. There are exceptions for sports like athletics and cycling.

Equipment utilized by competitors in this class may differ from sport to sport, and may include sighted guides, guide rails, beeping balls and clapsticks. There may be some modifications related to equipment and rules to specifically address needs of competitors in this class to allow them to compete in specific sports. Some sports specifically do not allow a guide, whereas cycling and skiing require one.

Definition

[edit]

B3 is a disability sport classification for people who have partial vision.[1] The International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA) defines this classification as "From visual acuity above 2/60 to visual acuity of 6/60 and/or visual field of more than 5 degrees and less than 20 degrees."[2] The Canadian Paralympic Committee defined B3 as "No more than 10% functional vision."[3] Competitors in this class "can make out shapes with the help of glasses".[4]

This classification is borrowed by some other sports, including blind golf who also define the class as "From visual acuity above 20/60 up to visual acuity of 6/60 and/or visual field of above 5 degrees and less than 20 degrees."[5] Para-alpine skiing sport specific versions[6] of this definition include one by the Australian Paralympic Committee which defined this classification as "Athletes with slightly more vision or more than five degrees but less than 20 degrees."[7] The International Paralympic Committee defined B3 for alpine skiing as "From visual acuity above 20/60 up to visual acuity of 6/60 and/or visual field of more than 5 degrees and less than 20 degrees."[8] This classification has parallels in other sports. For adaptive rowing, the comparable classification is LTA-B3;[9] for athletics, the class is T13;[10][11] and equivalent for swimming is S13.[12]

IBSA handles classification for a number of sports internationally including five-a-side football, goalball and judo.[1][2][13] Part of being classified involves assessing vision for factors including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color vision, motion detections and visual field.[12] When being assessed into this class by the IBSA, the process first includes the athlete filling out a consent form, submitting a photograph, and scheduling an appointment with a classifier for evaluation. During the evaluation, the competitor may be accompanied by another person to assist them in communicating with the classifiers. If necessary, the person can also bring a translator. The assessment is then conducted and is medical. There are several status groups used by classifiers that assist in classification. This includes confirmed for competitors who have a visual impairment unlikely to change, Review for competitors who have vision that may fluctuate, New for competitors who have never been classified before, Not Eligible for competitors who have a visual impairment that is not severe enough and not likely to deteriorate in the future to the point where they could be eligible.[14]

Classification is also handled on a national and by sport level.[9][15] Australians seeking classification for blind sports can be classified by an IBSA classifier or an Australian Paralympic Committee vision impairment classifier.[9] In the United Kingdom, blind sport is handled by British Blind Sport,[16][17] which is recognized nationally by Sport England.[18] In the United States, governance related to this classification is handled by the United States Association for Blind Athletes (USABA).[15]

Not all sports use IBSA classifiers. For adaptive rowing, classification assignment may be handled by FISA, as was the case at the 2008 Summer Paralympics.[11] In athletics, classification assignment may be handled by the IPC, as was the case at the 2008 Summer Paralympics.[11] Cycling classification assignment for this class may be handled by the UCI, as was the case at the 2008 Summer Paralympic.[11] Otherwise, the swimmer competes under the normal rules governing Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA), the sport's highest authority, swimming competitions.[19] Swimming classification handled by IPC Swimming.[13]

Sports

[edit]

Eligible Paralympic sports for the B3 classification include adaptive rowing, athletics, cycling, five-a-side football, goalball, judo, para-alpine skiing, para-Nordic skiing, and swimming. On the Paralympic level, a number of disability sports are not open to this classification or other visually impaired competitors including archery, basketball, boccia, curling, fencing, ice sledge hockey, powerlifting, rugby, shooting, table tennis, tennis, volleyball.[20] Equestrian sport is not open to Paralympic sport in this classification,[21] and the FEI classification system has no parallel classification available for other levels of national and international competition.[22] For non-Paralympic sports or sports removed from the Paralympic programme, the classification is used in blind golf and lawn bowls.[5][23]

Performance can differ for this class compared to other blind classes. In swimming, the B1 class is significantly slower than B2 and B3 classes in 100 meter freestyle. The B3 class is significantly faster than B1 and B2 in the 100 meter backstroke.[24]

History

[edit]

B3 traces its history to the early history of blind sport. There was a belief that those with vision impairment that was less severe had a competitive advantage over competitors who had more severe impairment. Classification was developed by the IBSA to ensure more even competition across the different bands of visual acuity.[25] In 1976, the International Sports Organization for the Disabled (ISOD) developed a blind classification system. Parallel to this, IBSA and national blind sport associations were developing their own classification system, with the IBSA one based on visual acuity in place by 1980. The rise of the IBSA classification system for blind sport meant the ISOD classification system failed to gain traction in blind sports competition.[12][25][26]

The IBSA classification system has largely remained unchanged since it was put in place,[26] even as the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) attempted to move towards a more functional disability and evidence based system that does not rely on medical based classification.[27][28] In 2003, the IPC made an attempt to address "the overall objective to support and co-ordinate the ongoing development of accurate, reliable, consistent and credible sport focused classification systems and their implementation."[28] The IPC approved a classification system at the IPC General Assembly in 2007. This classification was part of the overall blind class group, and was still medically based despite changes in other disability types. IBSA was not prepared at the time to move towards a more functional classification system that is utilized other disability groups and sports.[14]

In some cases, non-Paralympic, non-IBSA affiliated sports have developed their own classification systems. This is the case with blind golf, where a classification existed by 1990 and was used at the Australian Open Golf Tournament for the Blind and Visually Impaired. At that time, four classifications existed and were the same as the IBSA for this class.[5]

Equipment

[edit]

Equipment utilized by competitors in the B3 class may include sighted guides, guide rails, beeping balls and clap sticks.[29]

The use of a sighted guide by people in this class is dependent on the specific requirements of the sport.[30] In athletics, where the parallel classification is T13, runners do not use guides in competition and generally do not use them in training.[4][10][31] In cycling, this classification uses a guide,[30] while utilizing a tandem bicycle with the guide sitting at the front.[32] When a cyclist is looking for a guide, they are encouraged to find one with a pace similar to their own.[30]

B3 classified Canadian skier Mac Marcoux and guide BJ Marcoux in action at the IPC Alpine World Championships in 2013

In para-alpine and para-Nordic skiing, guides for B2 and B3 skiers often position themselves differently as the skiers have some vision, which means the things a guide assists with will be different from what is required of a skier who has almost no sight. The guide may ski in front of the skier and use visual cues to inform the skier of what is ahead of them on the course.[33]

For S13 swimmers, a tapper may stand on the pool deck to tap the swimmer as they approach the wall.[12] The swimmer has to bring their own tapper.[34] Having a tapper is optional.[19]

In blind archery, B3 archers must use a tactile sighting device, and be unable to use a bow sight.[35]

Rules

[edit]

There are some rule differences for the B3 classification in competition that are sport specific.[36][37] In adaptive rowing's Coxed Four boat, LTA4+, the maximum number of rowers from this class allowed in the boat is one.[38] In athletics, T13 runners may get assistance at water stations in longer races.[37] In blind cricket, no more than four players in this class are allowed out of the eleven total players.[36]

While this classifications is open to five-a-side blind football,[1] women are not eligible to compete at the Paralympic Games.[20] This classification is eligible to play goalkeeper but in some competitions is not allowed to be a field player.[36]

In judo, all three blind sport classes compete against each other, with competitors classified by weight for the purposes of competition. Weight classes use the international standards used in the Olympics.[39]

In IBSA sailing competitions, the three person boat can have a maximum of five points, and must include at least one female and one male sailor on the boat.[40] In competitions run by Blind Sailing International, this class sometimes competes only against other boats with where all the sailors are in this class.[41]

In swimming, outside the use of a tapper, the swimmer competes under the normal rules governing FINA swimming competitions.[19]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

B3 (classification)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
B3 is a disability sport classification for athletes with visual impairments, specifically those with partial vision that is less severe than B1 or B2 but still significantly limits performance compared to fully sighted athletes. Defined by the International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA), it applies to individuals with ranging from better than 2/60 to 6/60 (or 20/600 to 20/200) and/or a of more than 5 degrees but less than 20 degrees in the better eye with best correction. This classification ensures fair competition in para-sports by grouping athletes with similar functional vision limitations. The B3 class is used across various Paralympic and international disciplines, including equivalents like , , and LTA-B3 in . It originated in the through IBSA's efforts to standardize classifications for blind and visually impaired athletes, evolving from earlier systems in blind to support inclusion in events like , , and .

Definition and Criteria

Visual Acuity Standards

The B3 classification designates athletes with a specific level of visual impairment characterized by in the better eye with best correction ranging from LogMAR 1.0 (equivalent to 20/200 Snellen) to LogMAR 1.4 (approximately 20/500 Snellen). This range represents a moderate impairment where individuals can perceive forms and contours but struggle with fine details. These standards are established by the International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA) to ensure fair competition grouping. The LogMAR scale, or logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, quantifies by measuring the angular size of the smallest detail resolvable, offering greater precision and repeatability than traditional Snellen charts due to its logarithmic progression and equal letter spacing. On this scale, lower values indicate better acuity (e.g., LogMAR 0.0 equals 20/20 normal vision), while higher values denote poorer vision. For example, LogMAR 1.0 (20/200) means that at 6 meters, the person recognizes details or shapes that someone with normal vision would see at 60 meters. B3 differs from B1, which covers severe impairments with visual acuity worse than LogMAR 2.6 (from no light perception to inability to recognize hand shapes, roughly below 20/4000), and B2, which includes acuity from LogMAR 1.5 to 2.6 (approximately 20/630 to 20/4000). As the mildest impairment among IBSA's visual classes, B3 allows eligibility for para-sports while excluding those with less severe vision. B3 classification applies to athletes who meet IBSA's minimum impairment criteria (visual acuity of LogMAR 1.0 or worse, or visual field <40°) but do not meet the more severe criteria for B1 or B2 classes. This level of impairment meets the threshold for legal blindness in many countries, defined as 20/200 or worse in the better eye with correction, which profoundly affects daily functioning by limiting tasks like navigating unfamiliar environments, reading small text, or recognizing faces at a distance without aids.

Visual Field Requirements

The B3 classification for visually impaired athletes includes as a criterion a constricted to a of less than 40 degrees in the best eye, serving as an alternative to standards to determine eligibility. This range distinguishes B3 athletes, who have sufficient to detect objects within a broader cone than more severe classes but face significant limitations compared to those with normal fields. According to International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA) guidelines, this constraint integrates with acuity standards, where B3 also encompasses acuities from LogMAR 1.0 to 1.4 (approximately 20/200 to 20/500 Snellen equivalent). Visual field testing for B3 classification typically employs Goldmann perimetry, considered the gold standard by IBSA, which maps the extent of peripheral vision using a dome-shaped perimeter and standardized stimuli like the III4e target. Alternative accepted methods include Humphrey Field Analyzer or Octopus perimetry, ensuring reliable measurement of field diameter. Constricted fields in this range impair mobility by reducing the ability to scan surroundings and detect approaching objects or hazards, often leading to compensatory head movements and increased collision risks during dynamic activities. Object detection is similarly affected, as athletes rely heavily on central vision within the constricted field, limiting spatial awareness and reaction times to peripheral stimuli. Conditions such as exemplify impairments qualifying for B3, where progressive rod and cone degeneration results in , progressively narrowing the field to within less than 40 degrees while preserving some central acuity. This peripheral loss creates a characteristic ring that evolves into severe constriction, fitting B3 parameters without advancing to total blindness. In comparison, a full visual field of 40 degrees or more in diameter, combined with visual acuity better than LogMAR 1.0, renders an athlete ineligible for visual impairment classes, as both minimum impairment criteria must be unmet. Conversely, fields of 5 degrees or less align with B1 classification, indicating near-total blindness where no usable peripheral vision remains for functional purposes. Fields constricted to less than 10 degrees but 5 degrees or more align with B2.

Historical Development

Origins in Blind Sports

The International Sports Organization for the Disabled (ISOD), established in , laid the groundwork for organized blind sports in the by promoting competitions for athletes with visual impairments alongside other disabilities. ISOD actively advocated for the inclusion of blind athletes in major international events, which led to their debut at the 1976 Toronto Paralympics, where emerged as the inaugural sport for this group. At the 1976 Toronto Paralympics, a three-tier visual system (B1-B3) was initially adopted to enable fair participation in sports such as and athletics, accommodating 187 visually impaired athletes. This framework categorized competitors by the degree of , with B3 for the least severe eligible impairment, establishing a foundation for later standards that include acuity better than 20/600 up to 20/200 and/or a of more than 5 degrees but less than 20 degrees. Early efforts faced significant challenges from inconsistent national definitions of , which varied across countries and complicated equitable competition. ISOD leaders advocated for standardized visual classes to resolve these disparities, efforts that culminated in the formation of the International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA) in 1981 as ISOD's dedicated successor for blind sports.

Evolution of Classification Systems

In the 1980s, the International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA) standardized the B3 classification criteria as part of its foundational three-class system for visually impaired athletes, assessing partial sight levels between 2/60 and 6/60. Following the integration of IBSA sports into the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) framework in the late 1990s and early 2000s, classification systems underwent refinements to align with evidence-based principles. The 2007 IPC Classification Code initiated this evidence-based approach, leading to adjustments that ensured fairness, including visual field requirements of more than 5 degrees but less than 20 degrees in the better eye for B3, alongside acuity thresholds, to better correlate impairment with performance impacts across sports. Responses to classification controversies emerged prominently around the 2012 London Paralympics, where IPC and IBSA implemented pre-Games audits and enhanced verification protocols to mitigate misclassification risks, addressing concerns over eligibility integrity in categories amid broader debates on system transparency. In the , updates have emphasized inclusivity in processes.

Applications in Para-Sports

Eligible Competitions and Disciplines

B3 athletes, classified under the International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA) as having the least severe visual impairment eligible for blind sports, participate in core IBSA-governed competitions that emphasize team and individual events adapted for partial vision. Goalball is a prominent team ball sport where B3 players compete alongside B1 and B2 athletes on the same team, using a ball with bells to track movement in a fully darkened court, ensuring fairness across visual classes. In judo, B3 competitors (equivalent to J3) engage in tactile-based combat, relying on grips and ground contact rather than visual cues, with matches structured by weight categories. Powerlifting for B3 involves bench press lifts only, where athletes from all IBSA visual classes (B1-B3) vie in open weight divisions without separation by impairment level. Tenpin bowling accommodates B3 participants in events that may integrate classes or hold dedicated competitions, focusing on precision throws with lane guides for alignment. Within the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) framework, B3 classification aligns with specific events in Paralympic sports, mapping to the least impaired visual subclass for equitable competition. In athletics, B3 athletes enter T13 (track) and F13 (field) events, such as sprints, jumps, and throws, often without a guide due to their partial sight, though combined starts with other visual classes enhance visibility and timing synchronization. Swimming features B3 in the S13 class across strokes like freestyle and medley, where swimmers use their residual vision to follow lane markers with minimal aids like tappers for turns. Cycling includes B3 in tandem bicycle events (classified as B), pairing with a sighted pilot to navigate road and track races, emphasizing synchronization over individual propulsion. Beyond Summer Paralympic programs, B3 athletes compete in additional disciplines with targeted adaptations. offers B3-specific slalom and races, where partial vision allows navigation of gates with colored markers for contrast, distinct from more guided lower classes. Shooting para sport enables B3 in air rifle events using acoustic targeting systems that provide audio feedback on sight alignment, compensating for field restrictions without physical guides. In football 5-a-side, B1 athletes serve as field players wearing eye shades, while B2 or B3 athletes may act as goalkeepers without eye shades, using a rattling ball and guides behind the goals, with rules adapted from .

Notable Athletes and Achievements

Michael Edgson, a Canadian swimmer classified in the B3 category due to with acuity lower than 20/200, became one of the most decorated Paralympic athletes in history, securing 20 medals including 18 golds across four Games from to 1996. His dominance was particularly evident at the 1988 Seoul Paralympics, where he won nine gold medals in events such as the 100m freestyle, , and , all in the B3 class, showcasing adaptive techniques like precise lane discipline despite limited . Edgson's achievements elevated the visibility of B3 classification in swimming, inspiring subsequent generations of visually impaired athletes in and beyond. In athletics, Irish sprinter , competing in the T13 (B3 equivalent) class as a legally blind athlete, retired undefeated in major international finals, amassing five Paralympic gold medals in the 100m and 200m events at Beijing 2008, 2012, and Rio 2016. Smyth's blistering times, including a 10.46-second 100m at 2012, set multiple world records and highlighted the speed attainable with B3-level vision through reliance on auditory cues from guides and . His unbroken streak across three decades underscored the competitive parity within the class and influenced training protocols for visually impaired sprinters globally. Belarusian swimmer Ihar Boki has further exemplified B3 excellence in the S13 , earning 16 Paralympic gold medals by Tokyo 2020 across three Games from London 2012 to Tokyo 2020, and a total of 21 golds across five Games through 2024, making him the most successful Paralympian in swimming history. Specializing in and medley events, Boki's victories, such as four golds at Rio 2016 and five at 2024, demonstrated masterful stroke efficiency and breath control adapted for partial sight, often outpacing able-bodied swimmers in open-water exhibitions. His longevity and record-breaking performances have advocated for refined criteria, ensuring B3 athletes compete on equitable terms while pushing the boundaries of sports. These athletes' milestones, from Edgson's medal hauls to Smyth's sprint supremacy and Boki's swimming dynasty, have not only set benchmarks for B3 performance but also amplified the class's role in para-sports, fostering greater inclusion and technical innovation in disciplines like and .

Classification Procedures

Evaluation and Assessment

The initial evaluation for B3 classification requires athletes to submit a Medical Diagnostic Form completed by a certified ophthalmologist, detailing the nature and extent of their , with the form being no older than 12 months and provided at least six weeks before the classification session. This documentation confirms an eligible impairment, such as damage to the eye structure, optic nerves, optical pathways, or , affecting at least one eye and resulting in a stable condition. The assessment is performed by an international classification panel of at least two certified classifiers, including an ophthalmologist or optometrist approved by the International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA) and the (IPC). During the pre-competition medical examination, is measured in the better eye under best correction using LogMAR charts or equivalent Snellen methods at a standard distance, while extent is evaluated through automated perimetry, such as Goldmann, Humphrey, or perimeters. For B3 eligibility, the better eye must demonstrate best-corrected from LogMAR 1.0 to 1.4 and/or a of less than 40 degrees. Complementing the medical tests, a functional assessment verifies the impairment's impact in a controlled, non-competitive setting, often involving tasks such as obstacle navigation to observe the athlete's ability to detect and avoid objects. This step ensures the reflects the practical effects on performance potential without introducing sport-specific elements. Classifications for B3 are typically conducted at major international events, including , world championships, and continental competitions, under the oversight of IBSA's Medical Director and Classification Committee to maintain uniformity and integrity.

Reclassification and Appeals

Reclassifications for B3 athletes occur through periodic re-evaluations or reviews to account for potential changes in . Under the (IPC) Athlete Classification Code, athletes may receive a Class Status of "Review with Fixed Review Date" (R-FRD), requiring re-evaluation no later than four years after the initial , using the same standardized tests for (measured in LogMAR) and (typically via Goldmann perimetry). This process ensures ongoing eligibility, as visual impairments like those qualifying for B3—visual acuity between LogMAR 1.00 and 1.40 (approximately 20/200 to 20/500) and/or visual field of less than 40 degrees—are generally stable but subject to verification if evidence indicates progression or improvement. Medical reviews can trigger reclassification if an athlete's impairment changes significantly, such as through treatment or natural progression; these are initiated by national members or the International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA) and involve re-testing, potentially shifting status from Confirmed to Review. IBSA and IPC guidelines outline upgrades or downgrades based on updated measurements: for instance, if improves beyond LogMAR 1.00 (better than approximately 20/200), an athlete no longer meets B3 criteria and may be reclassified to a less impaired category or deemed ineligible for classes altogether, disqualifying them from B3 competition. Conversely, worsening impairment could upgrade to B2 if acuity exceeds the B3 threshold while still meeting eligible impairment criteria. The protest process allows challenges to an athlete's B3 classification, typically initiated by an IBSA member or national federation within one hour of the evaluation outcome or competition-related observation. Protests are reviewed by a dedicated Protest Panel, which may conduct an on-site re-test using acuity charts and perimetry equipment to verify measurements; if upheld, the original class stands, but successful protests can lead to immediate reclassification. In competition settings like events, oral protests on classification-related issues must be lodged within 30 minutes of the relevant decision, with written follow-up and a , escalating to a Jury of Appeal if needed. Appeals provide a further recourse for procedural errors or disputed outcomes, filed by IBSA members to the Legal and Ethics Committee within seven days of the protest decision. Under IPC rules, appeals are handled by an independent body, focusing on eligibility or process breaches rather than re-testing impairment, with final decisions binding and non-appealable beyond the . Successful appeals remain rare due to the rigorous evidence requirements, though cases have arisen from measurement variances.

Equipment and Adaptations

General Assistive Technologies

B3 athletes, who have low vision with visual acuity ranging from 2/60 to 6/60, rely on general assistive technologies to support daily activities, off-field preparation, and training integration without restoring full sight, thereby maintaining their classification eligibility. Low-vision devices such as optical magnifiers, including handheld and sheet types, enable athletes to enlarge printed materials like training schedules or nutritional guides during preparation sessions. Video magnifiers, which connect to monitors for adjustable magnification and color contrast, further assist in reviewing visual aids or maps. Screen readers, such as JAWS or VoiceOver, convert digital text from apps and websites into speech, facilitating access to online resources for strategy planning or performance analysis. Talking calculators provide auditory feedback for computations involved in tracking progress or managing logistics. Mobility aids are essential for safe navigation in training environments and daily life, adapted to preserve B3 eligibility by not enhancing visual function beyond permitted levels. canes, often with reflective tips for low-light detection, allow athletes to detect obstacles and maintain orientation during general mobility practice. Guide dogs, trained specifically for visually impaired handlers, offer reliable companionship and support, with handlers undergoing to ensure compatibility with athletic routines. These aids promote without optical correction that could alter status. Audio technologies enhance in general by providing non-visual cues that simulate or compensate for visual limitations. Beepers and audible beacons, integrated into devices like apps, emit sounds to signal locations or obstacles, aiding spatial orientation during warm-ups or facility . Verbal cues from coaches or teammates deliver real-time guidance on positioning and timing, fostering reliance on auditory feedback for skill development. These tools align with broader needs in para-sports contexts. Accessibility standards for B3 athletes emphasize integration with the International Paralympic Committee's (IPC) universal design principles, which promote equitable environments through perceptible information and flexible use. High-contrast and materials (minimum 14-point font) ensure visibility in venues, while tactile walking surfaces detectable by canes guide movement. Audio announcements and synthesized voice systems in public spaces further support navigation, embodying IPC guidelines for dignity and functionality in event planning. These principles extend to training facilities, reducing barriers for low-vision needs.

Sport-Specific Modifications

In goalball, a exclusively for athletes with visual impairments including the B3 classification, the equipment and court setup are designed to rely on auditory and tactile cues to accommodate partial sight. The ball contains bells that rattle loudly during play, enabling B3 athletes—who have between 2/60 and 6/60—to track its movement primarily through sound rather than vision. Tactile lines made from taped string mark the court's boundaries and central areas, allowing players to orient themselves by touch, which is particularly beneficial for those with residual vision in the B3 category who wear opaque eyeshades for equity. In , athletes in the S13 class, corresponding to B3-level with a of less than 20 degrees diameter, utilize ropes as tethers to maintain straight-line swimming paths, compensating for limited . Acoustic signals provided by tappers—assistants who use poles to tap the pool deck or the swimmer's one before the wall—alert S13 competitors to impending turns, ensuring precise flip turns without relying on visual cues like the lane markings. For events in the T13 , which aligns with B3 , starter guns incorporate visual flashes alongside the auditory report to provide a dual-signal start for with partial sight. Guide runners, connected via a supplied by the , offer optional physical guidance during track events like sprints and middle-distance races, helping T13 competitors maintain direction and pace on the track despite constricted visual fields.

References

  1. https://www.usaba.org/membership/visual-classifications/
  2. https://ibsasport.org/
  3. https://www.paralympic.org/classification
  4. https://ibsasport.org/anti-doping-and-classification/classification/for-classifiers/
  5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564307/
  6. https://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/cfr20/404/404-1581.htm
  7. https://old.ibsasport.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/NEW-GUIDELINES-FOR-THE-EQUIPMENT-FOR-CLASSIFICATION-REQUIRED-BY-COMPETITION-ORGANISERS.pdf
  8. https://ibsasport.org/pdf/Classification-Manual-for-Organisers-of-Sanctioned-Competitions.pdf
  9. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00387/full
  10. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240509
  11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519518/
  12. https://eyewiki.org/Retinitis_Pigmentosa
  13. https://ibsasport.org/about/who-we-are/history/
  14. https://www.paralympic.org/toronto-1976
  15. https://ibsasport.org/growing-blind-sports/classification/
  16. https://paralymp.ru/upload/iblock/a4b/0xckm0rkos4rxwvo5zk7bs65tb7aihqv.pdf
  17. https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/Position%20statement%20on%20the%20sport-specific%20classification%20of%20athletes%20with%20vision%20impairment_2018_07_05_Updated%20Jan2024.pdf
  18. https://www.cnn.com/2012/08/31/sport/london-2012-paralympics-classification-arlen
  19. https://www.paralympic.org/goalball/about
  20. https://ibsasport.org/sports/powerlifting/classification/
  21. https://www.paralympic.org/athletics/classification
  22. https://www.paralympic.org/blind-football/about
  23. https://www.paralympic.org/michael-edgson
  24. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/michael-edgson
  25. https://bcsportshall.com/honoured_member/michael-edgson/
  26. https://www.paralympic.org/jason-smyth
  27. https://paralympics.ie/team-ireland-profiles/jason-smyth/
  28. https://www.sportireland.ie/jason-smyth
  29. https://www.paralympic.org/ihar-boki
  30. https://ibsasport.org/pdf/IBSA-Classification-rules-2018.pdf
  31. https://ibsasport.org/anti-doping-and-classification/classification/for-athletes-and-teams/
  32. https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/2024-03/World%20Para%20Athletics%20Rules%20and%20Regulations_March%202024_0.pdf
  33. https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/IPC%20Accessibility%20Guide%20-%204th%20edition%20-%20October%202020_0.pdf
  34. https://www.perkins.org/resource/z-assistive-technology-low-vision/
  35. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology
  36. https://www.latimes.com/sports/olympics/story/2024-08-28/visually-impaired-athletes-paralympics-senses
  37. https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/swimming-without-the-black-line-how-blind-athletes-adapt/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.