Hubbry Logo
Black CircleBlack CircleMain
Open search
Black Circle
Community hub
Black Circle
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Black Circle
Black Circle
Black Circle
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Black Circle
ArtistKazimir Malevich
Year1924
Mediumoil on canvas
Dimensions106 cm × 105.5 cm (42 in × 41.5 in)
LocationState Russian Museum, St. Petersburg, Russia

Black Circle (or motive 1915) is a 1924 oil-on-canvas painting by the Russian avant-garde artist Kazimir Malevich, founder of the Suprematism movement. From the mid-1910s, Malevich abandoned any trace of figurature or representation from his paintings in favour of pure abstraction.

Description

[edit]

The work depicts a monumental perfect black circle floating on a flat white background. It is, along with his Black Square of 1915, one of his most well known early works in this field, depicting pure geometrical figures in primary colours.[1][2] The motif of a black circle was displayed in December 1915 at the '0.10'[3] Exhibition in St. Petersburg along with 34 other of his abstract works.[4] The exhibition coincided with the publication of his manifesto "From Cubism to Suprematism" and launched the radical Suprematism movement.[2]

Malevich described the painting, along with the similar Black Square and Black Cross (both 1915), in spiritual terms; "new icons" for the aesthetics of modern art, and believed that their clarity and simplicity reflected traditional Russian piety. In these notions, his art and ideas later chimed with those of the Bolsheviks. However, while the paintings found favour with intellectuals, they did not appeal to the general viewer and as a result Malevich lost official approval.[5] He was later persecuted by Stalin, who had an implicit mistrust of all modern art.

Interpretation

[edit]

In his manifesto, Malevich said the works was intended as "desperate struggle to free art from the ballast of the objective world" by focusing only on pure form.[5] He sought to paint works that could be understood by all, but at the same time would have an emotional impact comparable to religious works. In 1990, art critic Michael Brenson noted of the works, "The one constant in Malevich's Suprematism is the white ground. It is utterly selfless and anonymous yet distinct. It is a dense emptiness, or full void. It is atmospheric yet it has little air, and it does not suggest sky. It does not envelop or squeeze the rectangles, rings and lines. It is ready and available but not transparent. It is not open or closed but both at the same time. Some white shapes nestle inside it. Most shapes stick to it. Nothing is trapped. Everything seems held yet free. Shape and whiteness are different but they never struggle."[6]

In 1924, the work along with the Square and Cross, hung at the 14th Venice Biennale.[7] Malevich's work of this period went on to have a significant influence on 20th-century art, most especially on photography of the 1920s and 30s and on the op art movement of the 1960s.[2]

When Malevich died in 1934, he was buried in a coffin decorated by Nikolai Suetin with a black square at the head and a black circle at the foot.[8]

Notes

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Gray, Camilla. The Great Experiment: Russian Art, 1863-1922. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1962
  • Farthing, Stephen. 1001 Paintings You Must See Before You Die. Cassel Illustrated, 2011. ISBN 978-1-84403-704-9
  • Branislav, Jakovljevic. "Unframe Malevich!: Ineffability and Sublimity in Suprematism". Art Journal (CAA), volume 63, no. 3, 2004. JSTOR 4134488
  • Néret, Gilles. Kazimir Malevich 1878-1935 and Suprematism. Taschen, 2003. ISBN 0-87414-119-2
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Black Circle

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Black Circle is a suprematist painting executed by Russian artist in 1915, featuring a solitary black circular form positioned off-center against an expansive white ground. This work embodies the core tenets of , an movement Malevich founded to prioritize pure sensation and over figurative representation, rejecting the imitation of natural forms in favor of non-objective that conveys infinite spiritual essence through basic shapes and colors. Debuted in the pivotal "0.10" in Petrograd, the Black Circle alongside Malevich's and other elemental compositions marked a radical break from prior artistic traditions, influencing subsequent developments in abstract and minimalist by asserting the supremacy of form as an autonomous reality. Its stark simplicity challenged viewers to perceive beyond material depiction, positioning it as a foundational piece in twentieth-century despite later suppressions under Soviet realism that curtailed Malevich's experimental output.

Historical Context and Creation

Origins in Suprematism

Suprematism, founded by , emerged as a radical departure from representational art in the , prioritizing non-objective geometric forms to evoke pure sensation over imitation of nature. The movement crystallized in December 1915 at "The Last Futurist Exhibition of Paintings 0.10" in Petrograd, where Malevich exhibited 39 works, including his seminal , rejecting the fragmented dynamism of and in favor of absolute abstraction. These forms—square, circle, and cross—served as elemental "zero degrees" of painting, stripping away narrative and materiality to access infinite, immaterial energy. Malevich articulated Suprematism's principles in his 1915 manifesto From Cubism and Futurism to Suprematism: The New Painterly Realism, declaring the supremacy of color and form as the essence of artistic creation, unbound by earthly objects or horizons. In this framework, the circle emerged as a of boundless, non-anthropomorphic void and cosmic rhythm, contrasting the grounded stasis of the square while advancing toward a dematerialized "nothingness" beyond representation. This theoretical shift built on Malevich's pre-1915 experiments with dynamic compositions, evolving toward static, pure geometries that embodied the "zero form" as art's foundational truth. The Black Circle traces its conceptual origins to these early Suprematist innovations, extending the Black Square's role as the "zero point" of painting into circular form to represent eternal motion and the dissolution of boundaries. Retrospectively, Malevich linked Suprematism's to his 1913 geometric stage designs, which prefigured the abstraction of basic shapes like the circle as vehicles for transcendent feeling, free from utilitarian or imitative constraints. By the early , this progression culminated in isolated, monochromatic forms such as the Black Circle, refining the movement's quest for non-objective purity.

Production and Exhibitions

Black Circle was produced circa 1923 by as an oil-on-canvas painting measuring 105.5 by 106 cm, during a period of refinement in his Suprematist geometric forms following the conclusion of the in 1922. This work emerged under the early Soviet regime, which initially permitted experimentation before the imposition of as state doctrine in the late and . The painting debuted internationally at the 14th in 1924, displayed in the Soviet pavilion alongside Malevich's Black Square and Black Cross as representatives of non-objective art. This exhibition marked one of the last major international showcases for Malevich's abstract Suprematist compositions before domestic policies curtailed such styles, reflecting a brief window of under the era. Following its appearance, Black Circle entered state ownership and was acquired by the State Russian Museum in St. Petersburg in , where it has remained in the collection since. The transfer occurred amid the consolidation of Soviet cultural institutions, which prioritized of avant-garde holdings despite growing ideological opposition to .

Description and Technical Details

Visual Elements

depicts a single, opaque black circular form positioned centrally on a square white ground. The circle fills a significant portion of the , with sharply defined edges and uniform density throughout its surface, lacking any visible gradations, lines, or internal modulations. This composition eliminates texture variations and additional shapes, presenting only the essential contrast between the black circle and the uninflected white background. Unlike earlier Suprematist paintings featuring dynamic arrangements of multiple forms, Black Circle isolates the circular motif to emphasize its geometric isolation. Empirical examinations of reproductions reveal the hand-painted nature through minor edge irregularities visible under magnification, though the overall effect maintains high formal precision at standard viewing scales.

Medium, Dimensions, and Provenance

Black Circle is an oil-on-canvas painting measuring 105.5 by 105.5 centimeters. The square format aligns with the geometric forms emphasized in , providing a balanced field for the central circular form. The work's provenance traces to Kazimir Malevich's studio, where it was produced as part of his Suprematist output, initially dated to motifs from though executed around 1923-1924. Following Malevich's death in 1935, Soviet authorities nationalized many artworks, transferring Black Circle to state collections and ultimately to the in St. Petersburg, , where it has resided since. No authenticated replicas specific to this are documented in major collections, though Malevich produced related Suprematist studies exploring circular motifs.

Artistic Intent and Interpretations

Malevich's Theoretical Framework

articulated as the supremacy of pure feeling in creative art, positing that visual phenomena from the objective world hold no intrinsic artistic value and must be discarded to achieve unadulterated sensation. In his 1915 manifesto From and to Suprematism: The New Pictorial Realism, Malevich rejected representational art as a materialistic constraint, arguing that it enslaved creativity to earthly objects and logic, thereby stifling the artist's innate impulse toward abstract, non-objective expression. He positioned geometric forms—such as the square and —as emanations of this pure feeling, devoid of utility or , designed to provoke immediate sensory and emotional responses akin to primal cosmic energies. Central to Malevich's rationale for works like Black Circle (1915) was the circle's status as a transcendent form, symbolizing infinite motion and the zero-point of creation beyond representational chains. Unlike earlier artistic traditions tied to perspective or figuration, the circle embodied a direct causal link to universal feeling, unburdened by cultural or logical mediation, much like a secular icon that elicits resonance through form alone rather than story or symbolism. Malevich emphasized that such shapes functioned as agents of sensory immediacy, fostering a state of "pure nothing" that mirrored the void's creative potential while evoking emotional plenitude. In The Non-Objective World (1927), Malevich further refined this framework, asserting that non-objective art culminates in when feeling supplants objectivity as , rendering geometric primitives like the circle as vehicles for spiritual-like stripped of dogma. He described the progression to these forms as a liberation from the "horizon-ring" of natural confines, where the circle's asserts dynamic supremacy over static lines, directly stimulating innate human without interpretive filters. This approach prioritized empirical sensation over intellectual analysis, positing the forms' inherent plasticity as sufficient to generate authentic artistic experience.

Symbolic and Philosophical Readings

In Suprematist philosophy, the Black Circle functions as a symbol of the zero-point of creation, embodying the void from which artistic and existential forms arise, akin to the foundational "nothingness" Malevich articulated in his 1915 manifesto From Cubism and Futurism to Suprematism. This interpretation positions the circle as an origin of pure sensation, detached from representational content, intended to elevate perception toward non-objective spiritual experience. Malevich's primary geometric shapes, including the circle, square, and cross, collectively represent stages of "being of non-being," with the black circle evoking the infinite potential inherent in emptiness rather than mere negation. The work's mystical dimensions draw from Russian Orthodox apophatic traditions, where black signifies the ineffable Absolute through negation, paralleling Malevich's conception of as a method to perceive divine inaccessibility. In his later Mystical series (1920–1922), Malevich reinforced this by treating black forms as icons of liberated nothingness, critiquing materialist reductionism by prioritizing spiritual infinity over empirical depiction. This aligns with the circle's inherent symbolism of eternity and cosmic wholeness, serving as a counterpoint to Bolshevik-era industrialization's emphasis on utilitarian production, as Malevich's writings in the 1920s framed as an assertion of transcendent feeling against mechanistic progress. Philosophically, the Black Circle extends Malevich's anti-materialist stance, positioning the void not as nihilistic absence but as generative potential, resonant with broader Russian intellectual currents seeking spiritual renewal amid upheaval. Malevich's intent was icon-like, aiming to foster existential elevation by confronting viewers with the formless source of creation, thereby bypassing rationalist constraints for direct intuitive apprehension.

Alternative Viewpoints

Formalist interpretations of Black Circle emphasize its optical and compositional properties independent of symbolic intent, focusing on the perceptual tension created by the curvilinear black form against the rectilinear square . The circle's central yet slightly imperfect positioning generates dynamic visual instability, as the viewer's navigates the interplay between the bounded shape and the unbounded white field, producing effects of expansion and containment. Psychological analyses frame Black Circle as a stimulus for subjective projection, akin to Rorschach inkblots, where the stark prompts viewers to impose personal interpretations on the void-like form. This aligns with Gestalt psychology's principles of figure-ground organization and perceptual grouping, which explain how the high-contrast geometric element fosters emergent perceptions of movement or depth despite the work's flatness. Applications of Gestalt theory to abstract , including Suprematist precedents, underscore how such forms elicit holistic responses beyond literal content. Empirical studies on responses to Malevich's abstract works reveal that perceptual accuracy of geometric forms influences appreciation, with unaltered configurations like the circle's proportions maximizing cognitive and aesthetic valuation. Neuroaesthetic research on abstract geometric stimuli indicates these can provoke unease through unresolved visual or sensations of transcendence via reduced representational cues, engaging neural pathways associated with aesthetic processing and emotional arousal. Viewer surveys of similar Suprematist compositions report varied evocations of tension or serenity, supporting the role of individual perceptual in interpreting minimal forms.

Reception and Impact

Contemporary Responses

The Suprematist works debuted by at the "Last Futurist Exhibition of Paintings: 0.10" in Petrograd on December 19, 1915, including abstractions akin to Black Circle, provoked immediate controversy among artists and critics. Malevich positioned these non-objective forms as a radical break from representational art, but many contemporaries viewed them as an absurd endpoint of modernism's excesses. Critic Alexander Benua, writing in response to the exhibition, rejected Malevich's Suprematist claims as lacking substantive , framing them within a broader critique of avant-garde epigonism and emphasizing the hegemonic role of in validating . Other reviewers echoed this, attributing to the works a sense of playful "tricks" at best, while decrying their departure from skill-based craft. Public attendees reportedly reacted with derision, laughing at the stark geometries and dismissing them as childish scribbles or evidence of artistic madness, underscoring a divide between elite experimentation and broader incomprehension. During the period (1921–1928), early Soviet cultural policy exhibited relative tolerance toward , enabling Malevich to lead educational initiatives and exhibit pieces domestically. This openness extended internationally, as evidenced by the inclusion of Malevich's compositions alongside Liubov Popova's in the Soviet pavilion at the 1924 , signaling emerging prestige amid diplomatic efforts to showcase revolutionary creativity. However, even then, detractors within Soviet circles labeled a "sermon of nothingness and destruction," highlighting persistent ideological skepticism toward its perceived detachment from materialist utility.

Soviet Suppression and Later Revival

In the 1930s, the Soviet regime under enforced as the sole official artistic doctrine, denouncing abstract forms like those in as "formalist deviations" that prioritized empty formalism over content glorifying the and socialist progress. This shift, formalized at the First All-Union Congress of Soviet Writers in 1934, directly targeted Malevich's non-representational works, including Black Circle, for failing to serve purposes through explicit ideological messaging. Archival records indicate that such abstraction conflicted with state directives demanding art reinforce collective labor, industrialization, and party loyalty, leading to widespread of avant-garde holdings. Malevich himself faced direct persecution, arrested on September 20, 1930, by the OGPU in Leningrad on fabricated charges tied to alleged Polish sympathies, and held for several months under threat of execution. His studio was ransacked, and Suprematist paintings like Black Circle were confiscated, repurposed for storage, or obscured in state museum basements such as the and State Russian Museum, where they survived destruction but were barred from public display to prevent "bourgeois" influences. By Malevich's death in 1935, over 1,000 of his works had been sequestered, with exhibitions of effectively prohibited nationwide. Access remained severely restricted through the Stalin era and into the post-war period, though the Khrushchev Thaw from the mid-1950s permitted sporadic showings of select modernist pieces in unofficial or limited venues, reflecting partial ideological easing without rehabilitating fully. Systematic revival accelerated during in the late , culminating after the USSR's dissolution, when declassified archives and relaxed export controls enabled Black Circle and similar canvases to reemerge in major exhibitions. A pivotal 1989 retrospective in , followed by international tours, marked this turning point, with post- shows—including a 1991 survey of 77 paintings—drawing from Soviet collections and boosting global scholarly access by factors of over tenfold compared to pre-glasnost decades. This recovery was driven by archival openings revealing suppression's extent, alongside market demands that valued Suprematist universality anew in a post-communist context unburdened by state monopoly on narrative.

Influence on Subsequent Art Movements

The motifs of pure in Black Circle (1915), particularly the isolated black circle as a symbol of non-objective form, contributed to the foundations of by emphasizing reduction to elemental shapes devoid of narrative or illusionism. Ad Reinhardt's "ultimate" , produced from 1954 onward, echoed this Suprematist dematerialization through their near-imperceptible grids submerged in matte black fields, with Reinhardt citing Suprematism's influence on his rejection of color and figuration in favor of art as a contemplative, ethical void. Suprematism's geometric purity, as exemplified by the circle's autonomy from spatial context, extended to interwar design movements like and , where it informed experiments in universal form and function. In , artists such as integrated circular and rectangular elements into compositions seeking a "new and universal plastic language" akin to Malevich's sensation-based abstraction, evident in van Doesburg's 1917-1918 works blending Suprematist dynamics with neoplastic rectilinearity. practitioners, including , adopted these principles in the 1920s for light-space modulators and preliminary courses, adapting Suprematist forms to pedagogical tools for perceiving pure geometric relations over representational content. This lineage persisted into 1960s , where the circle's perceptual isolation prefigured optical vibrations in black-and-white patterns, though direct appropriations were mediated through broader modernist geometry rather than explicit homage. Malevich's works, including Suprematist circles, have sustained market influence, with comparable pieces achieving auction highs like $85.8 million at in 2018, reflecting institutional recognition of their role in abstraction's economic canon.

Criticisms and Controversies

Aesthetic and Technical Critiques

Critics have argued that the simplicity of Black Circle demonstrates a lack of technical craft, as the composition—a single black circle on a white ground—can be readily replicated using basic tools like a compass and paint, without requiring advanced artistic skill. This reproducibility has led some to compare Suprematist works to amateur or childish drawings, questioning the attribution of genius to Malevich for forms achievable by non-artists. Technical examinations reveal imperfections in execution, such as cracks in the black pigment and deviations from geometric purity, undermining claims of suprematist "purity" and suggesting hasty or unskilled application rather than deliberate mastery. For instance, analogous analyses of Malevich's show the form tilted approximately 1.5 degrees off true squareness, with irregular edges visible under close inspection; similar scrutiny applied to highlights its imperfect circularity, challenging the work's status as an ideal . The painting's high market valuations, with Malevich's Suprematist compositions fetching up to $85.8 million at auction, reflect speculative bubbles in the art market rather than intrinsic technical merit, as evidenced by broader critiques of inflated prices for minimalist works amid economic cycles of mania and correction. Art market reports have warned of a "mania phase" driving unsustainable valuations, particularly for abstract and modern pieces, where scarcity and hype eclipse objective skill assessments.

Ideological and Cultural Debates

![Black Circle, 1915][float-right] , exemplified by Malevich's Black Circle (1915), has sparked debates over whether its non-objective forms represent an elitist detachment from empirical reality, prioritizing abstract sensations over depictions of observable human experience accessible to broader audiences. Critics argue that such appeals primarily to elites, fostering a bourgeois escape that contrasts with the masses' preference for representational art grounded in causal depictions of and labor. In the Soviet context, Black Circle and similar Suprematist works faced condemnation as decadent and , embodying bourgeois formalism incompatible with proletarian values. By 1932, Malevich's abstractions were labeled "degenerate" in state exhibitions, reflecting official that viewed them as disconnected from the material realities of socialist . Stalinist policies enforced as a corrective, mandating that narratively affirmed worker achievements and empirical progress, suppressing avant-garde excess in favor of styles aligning with public tastes for recognizable forms. Western interpretations, conversely, have glorified as a progressive rupture from tradition, emphasizing its utopian pursuit of pure feeling beyond objective phenomena. This valuation often overlooks the movement's rejection of political engagement and its embrace of nothingness, as symbolized in zero-degree forms like the Black Circle, raising questions about whether such advances truth through distilled essence or evades causal representation of human conditions. Soviet-era critiques, rooted in a push for serving mass and realism, highlighted systemic biases in avant-garde circles toward , which academia and media later amplified despite evidence of popular disfavor for non-representational works.

References

  1. https://rusmuseumvrm.ru/data/collections/painting/19_20/zh_9472/index.php?lang=en
  2. https://www.aaronartprints.org/malevich-blackcircle.php
  3. https://blog.artsper.com/en/a-closer-look/kazimir-malevich-the-invention-of-the-absolute-square/
  4. https://www.thehistoryofart.org/kazimir-malevich/black-circle/
  5. https://www.moma.org/collection/works/80383
  6. https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/about/news/kazimir-malevich-and-the-last-futurist-exhibition-0-10/
  7. https://smarthistory.org/suprematism-part-i-kasimir-malevich/
  8. https://www.arthistoryproject.com/artists/kazimir-malevich/from-cubism-and-futurism-to-suprematism/
  9. https://monoskop.org/images/b/bc/Malevich_Kazimir_1915_1976_From_Cubism_and_Futurism_to_Suprematism.pdf
  10. https://www.theartstory.org/artist/malevich-kasimir/
  11. https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/context/theses/article/1515/viewcontent/Rowe__Matthew.pdf
  12. https://www.centrepompidou.fr/en/pompidou-plus/magazine/article/focus-on-kasimir-malevichs-black-cross
  13. https://monoskop.org/images/9/97/Barnett_Vivian_Endicott_1992_The_Russian_Presence_in_the_1924_Venice_Biennale.pdf
  14. https://www.artchive.com/artwork/black-circle-kasimir-malevich-1924/
  15. https://www.wallartk.com/store/abstract/black-circle-1916-kazimir-malevich-high-quality-print/
  16. https://www.artsy.net/artwork/kasimir-malevich-black-circle
  17. https://designmanifestos.org/kazimir-malevich-the-manifesto-of-suprematism/
  18. https://monoskop.org/images/5/58/Malevich_Kazimir_1927_2000_Suprematism.pdf
  19. https://suprematism.co.uk/suprematism-manifesto/
  20. https://www.moodbook.com/history/modernism/malevich-suprematism.html
  21. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/7/542
  22. https://www.artforum.com/features/malevich-as-a-counterrevolutionary-east-and-west-212841/
  23. https://www.spiritualarts.org.uk/kazimir-malevich/
  24. https://www.daplastique.com/essay/from-kazimir-malevichs-black-square-to-the-midnight-sun-of-adi-da-samraj
  25. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/kazimir-malevich-1561/five-ways-look-malevichs-black-square
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242391035_Generation_of_Abstract_Geometric_Art_Based_on_Exact_Aesthetics_Gestalt_Theory_and_Graphic_Design_Principles
  27. https://brill.com/view/journals/artp/9/4/article-p353_353.xml
  28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26993278/
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355908331_Perceptual_Organisation_Affects_Perception_and_Appreciation_of_Abstract_Art_A_Case_Study_with_Black_Square_and_Red_Square_by_Kazimir_Malevich
  30. https://www.artforum.com/features/malevich-and-khlebnikov-suprematism-reinterpreted-209163/
  31. https://patriciarailingwrites.net/pictorial-masses-in-movement-1915/
  32. https://monoskop.org/images/9/9b/Sharp_Jane_A_1992_The_Critical_Reception_of_the_010_Exhibition._Malevich_and_Benua.pdf
  33. https://hyperallergic.com/460030/the-soviet-art-school-that-cemented-suprematisms-spot-in-history/
  34. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/socialist-realism/
  35. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/arts-and-entertainment/soviet-union-bans-abstract-art
  36. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2000/may/11/artsfeatures2
  37. https://www.musings-on-art.org/blogs/artists/malevich-kazimir-a-tragic-visionary
  38. https://www.musings-on-art.org/blogs/art-movements/soviet-realism-early-years
  39. https://www.malevich-lostpaintings.com/post/manage-your-blog-from-your-live-site
  40. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/11/06/arts/malevich-show-scheduled-in-us.html
  41. https://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/p16028coll12/id/10024/download
  42. https://www.p55.art/en/blogs/p55-magazine/ad-reinhardt-the-spiritual-depth-of-art
  43. https://www.philiphautmann.at/kazimir-malevich-barnett-newman-ad-reinhardt-frank-stella/
  44. https://www.stedelijk.nl/en/digdeeper/suprematism-and-neoplasticism
  45. https://www.ilustromania.com/artistic-movements/suprematism
  46. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/suprematism/
  47. https://www.quora.com/How-do-abstract-artists-counter-the-claim-that-a-child-could-produce-similar-art
  48. https://www.haberarts.com/malevich.htm
  49. https://aliveordread.com/2025/02/26/kazimir-malevichs-black-square-a-hidden-critique-revealed/
  50. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/are-these-lost-malevich-masterpieces-or-190-million-fakes-2680753
  51. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/jan/17/art-market-mania-phase-bubble-report
  52. https://newcriterion.com/article/the-art-market-bubble/
  53. https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/molyneux/1998/xx/legitimacy.htm
  54. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/47/60047/becoming-revolutionary-on-kazimir-malevich
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.