Hubbry Logo
Boy (dog)Boy (dog)Main
Open search
Boy (dog)
Community hub
Boy (dog)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Boy (dog)
Boy (dog)
Boy (dog)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Boy
Boy and Prince Rupert of the Rhine in a pro-Parliamentary woodcut condemning the pair
SpeciesCanis familiaris
BreedPoodle
SexMale
Bornabt. 1638
Died2 July 1644
Marston Moor, Kingdom of England
Resting placeMarston Moor, England
OccupationHunting dog and military mascot
Years active1640–1644
Known forIconic Royalist symbol during English Civil War
OwnerPrince Rupert of the Rhine

Boy (also Boye, Puddle, or Pudel) was a white hunting poodle belonging to Royalist commander Prince Rupert of the Rhine during the English Civil War. Parliamentarian propaganda alleged that the dog was "endowed" with magical powers.

Boy accompanied his master into battle and was killed at the Battle of Marston Moor on 2 July 1644.

Origins

[edit]
In Royalist parodies, Boy was said to be a 'Lapland Lady' who had been transformed into a white dog.

Boy was first given to Prince Rupert when he was imprisoned in the fortress of Linz during the Thirty Years' War.[1] The Earl of Arundel, an Englishman who had grown concerned about Rupert's plight, gave him the animal to keep him company during his confinement.[1] The dog was a rare breed of white hunting poodle.

There were probably two poodles, one black and one white, given to Rupert in Germany. The black was lost early on in the war; it was the white survivor who became notorious. It was sometimes called "Puddle" (for "poodle"), but its most famous name was "Boy", although it might have been female.[2][3] Propaganda was put about that Boy had possession of dark powers as a 'dog-witch'.

Boy was sufficiently impressive and famous across Europe that the Ottoman Sultan of the day, Murad IV, requested that his ambassador attempt to find him a similar animal.[1] Boy accompanied Rupert during his travels until 1644.

Propaganda and magical powers

[edit]
Pro-Parliamentary pamphlet of 1643

Boy accompanied his master from 1642 to 1644 during the English Civil War.

Royalist pamphlet of 1643 depicting "Pudel" (probably Boy) facing off against a Parliamentarian's dog

Rupert was the iconic Royalist cavalier of the conflict and was frequently the subject of Parliamentarian propaganda.[4] Boy, who often accompanied Rupert into battle, featured heavily in this, and was widely suspected of being a witch's familiar. There were numerous accounts of Boy's abilities; some suggested that he was the Devil in disguise.[5]

John Cleveland and other Royalist satirists and parodists mocked these Parliamentarian attitudes and produced lampoons that satirised the alleged "superstition" and "credulity" of their opponents; Cleveland claimed that Boy was Prince Rupert's shapeshifting familiar, and of demonic origins.[6] Other satirists suggested that Boy was a "Lapland Lady" who had been transformed into a white dog. Boy was also "able" to find hidden treasure, was invulnerable to attack, could catch bullets fired at Rupert in his mouth, and prophesy as well as the 16th-century soothsayer, Mother Shipton.[7] Royalist soldiers also promoted Boy, as their adopted mascot, to the rank of Sergeant-Major-General.[8]

Reportedly, Boy had other endearing attributes, such as cocking his leg when he heard the name of John Pym, leader of the Parliamentarian forces.[9] He was also alleged to have performed for Charles I, slept in Prince Rupert's bed, and played with Princes Charles, James, Harry and Princess Henrietta, and was often fed roast beef and capon breast by Charles I himself.[10]

Death

[edit]
A contemporary depiction of Boy's death

Boy died during the Battle of Marston Moor in 1644. He had been left safely tied up in the Royalist camp, but escaped and chased after Rupert. The battle went badly for the Royalists, and Rupert was forced to flee the field; Boy was killed during the ensuing fighting. He was prominently depicted in woodcut scenes drawn of the battle at the time, lying upside down, dead;[11] Simon Ash, a contemporary historian of the event, drew specific attention to the death of this 'much spoken of' dog.[12]

Legacy

[edit]

Boy has been recorded as the first official British Army Dog.[13]

Contemporary works about Boy

[edit]
  • Observations Upon Prince Rupert's White Dog called Boy (Anonymous, 1642)[10]
  • A Dialogue, or Rather a Parley, between Prince Rupert's Dog whose name is Puddle and Tobies Dog, whose name is Pepper (Anonymous, 1643)[10]
  • The Parliament's Unspotted Bitch (Anonymous, 1643)[10]
  • The Parliament's Unspotted Bitch (Cover – Anonymous, 1643)[14]
  • A Dog's Elegy: Elegy of Prince Rupert's Tears for the Late Defeat at Marston Moor where his Beloved Dog named Boy was killed by a Valiant Soldier (Anonymous, 1644)[10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Boy (dog)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Boy (died 1644), also known as Boye, was a white hunting poodle owned by Prince Rupert of the Rhine, a leading commander on the Royalist side during the First English Civil War (1642–1646).
The dog served as Rupert's devoted companion, frequently accompanying him on military expeditions and earning a reputation as a regimental mascot among the Cavaliers.
Parliamentarian propagandists, seeking to discredit Rupert's martial prowess and personal character, disseminated pamphlets accusing Boy of supernatural powers, such as transforming into a pickaxe or drinking gunpowder, thereby casting him as a demonic familiar in a broader narrative of Royalist sorcery.
Boy met his death by musket fire at the Battle of Marston Moor on 2 July 1644, having broken free from restraints in the Royalist encampment to pursue Rupert amid the chaos of the engagement.

Biography

Origins

Boy, a white hunting poodle, was acquired by during his imprisonment in the fortress of , , amid the . Rupert, then in his early twenties, had been captured by Imperial forces in November 1639 following engagements in the Palatinate and was held until his release in April 1641 after negotiations involving his family and allies. The dog was presented to him as a gift—described in some accounts as a "get-well" gesture—by Thomas Howard, 14th Earl of Arundel, an English diplomat and art collector who wielded influence at the Imperial court and facilitated Rupert's parole discussions. Contemporary reports and later historical analyses indicate that arranged for the delivery of at least one such poodle, with some sources specifying two rare specimens: a one, which Rupert named , and a black one that reportedly died shortly after. of this era, originating from German water-retrieving breeds adapted for hunting, were valued for their , , and distinctive clipped coats suited to fieldwork; Boy exemplified these traits, accompanying Rupert on hunts and travels. The exact date of the gifting remains undocumented in primary sources, but it occurred during Rupert's , likely in 1640, as the prince returned to in 1642 with Boy already established as his constant companion. This acquisition reflected broader Continental aristocratic customs of gifting exotic animals to curry favor or alleviate confinement, with Boy's presence providing Rupert personal solace amid the war's hardships and his separation from Bohemian court life. No evidence suggests prior ownership by Rupert or selection, countering later propagandistic embellishments; the dog's origins were mundane, tied to diplomatic maneuvering rather than mysticism. Upon Rupert's arrival in to support his uncle Charles I, Boy transitioned seamlessly into the camp, setting the stage for his wartime role.

Role in the English Civil War

Boy served as the devoted companion and unofficial mascot to , the Royalist cavalry commander during the from 1642 to 1646. As a white hunting , he accompanied Rupert on campaigns starting from the prince's arrival in in 1642, symbolizing loyalty and the dashing ethos amid the conflict between Royalists and Parliamentarians. The dog frequently joined Rupert in the field, riding alongside during maneuvers and charges that characterized the forces' early successes. Boy's presence boosted troop morale, with soldiers viewing him as a of in battles such as those in the initial phases of the war, reinforcing Rupert's image as an audacious and effective leader. Royalist accounts elevated 's status, sometimes humorously promoting him to the honorary rank of sergeant-major general within the , marking him as an early example of a intended to foster and esprit de corps. This role extended beyond mere companionship, as Boy embodied the personal bravery and élan that Rupert instilled in his horsemen, contributing to the psychological edge of the King's forces in the war's opening years.

Death

Boy died during the on 2 July 1644. Prince Rupert had left the dog tied up in the camp to keep him out of harm's way, but Boy escaped amid the chaos and became entangled in the fighting. Contemporary accounts, including propaganda pamphlets, describe him chasing after Rupert or venturing onto the battlefield, where he was killed by Parliamentarian forces. The battle resulted in a decisive Parliamentarian victory, contributing to the Royalist retreat, during which Boy's death occurred. Rupert reportedly grieved the loss of his faithful companion, though primary evidence for his personal reaction remains limited to secondary historical interpretations. The event was quickly leveraged in wartime , with depictions emphasizing the dog's demise as part of broader narratives surrounding the conflict.

Propaganda and Mythology

Parliamentarian Accusations

Parliamentarian propagandists during the English Civil War depicted Boy as a demonic familiar spirit accompanying Prince Rupert, attributing to the dog a range of supernatural abilities to portray the Royalists as allied with witchcraft and evil. In pamphlets such as A Dialogue Between Prince Rupert's Dogge Called Boye, and Tobie's Dogge Called Pepper, Boy was described as "no Dog, but a Witch, a Sorceresse, an Enemy to Parliament… a meer Malignant Cavalier-Dog," implying sorcery and enmity toward the Parliamentary cause. Specific accusations included claims that possessed the power of prophecy, the ability to locate hidden treasure or goods, multilingual speech including Hebrew and High Dutch, and immunity to weapons, with suggestions that this invulnerability extended to Rupert himself. Other allegations portrayed Boy as capable of , shape-shifting—such as reincarnating from a Lapland witch—and engaging in vampiric or cannibalistic acts, reinforcing narratives of Rupert's household as a site of diabolical practices. These charges appeared in works like Observations From Prince Rupert's White Dog Called , which enumerated the dog's purported talents, and A True Relation of Prince Rupert's Barbarous Against the Towne of Brumingham (1643), which illustrated Boy alongside scenes of atrocities to amplify fears of malevolence. Insinuations of unnatural relations between Rupert and Boy, describing the dog as "very Loose, and Strumpet-like" and sharing the prince's bed, further sexualized the propaganda to evoke moral outrage. Such rhetoric exploited contemporary panics, where familiars were seen as imps sustaining witches through blood or milk, to delegitimize military successes by framing them as devil-assisted.

Claims of Supernatural Powers

During the , pamphlets circulated by Parliamentarian sympathizers accused Boy, Prince Rupert's , of possessing supernatural abilities, depicting him as a or demonic entity to erode support for the cause. These claims portrayed Boy as aiding Rupert through , including the ability to fetch from enemy soldiers and cause impotence among Parliamentarian troops. The 1642 anonymous pamphlet Observations upon Prince Rupert's White Dogge called Boye, ostensibly compiled by an observer "T.B.," enumerated specific alleged powers, such as rendering men's minds impotent against Royalist advances and performing feats attributed to sorcery rather than canine instinct. It described Boy not as an ordinary dog but as "a Witch, a Sorceresse," capable of behaviors interpreted as evidence of dark magic, including selective responses to names like "Charles" and "Pym" framed as enchanted obedience. Further accusations in contemporary broadsides claimed Boy could shapeshift into form, such as a or a transformed Lapland woman, and possess demonic origins that protected him from harm in battle. At engagements like Edgehill in 1642, propagandists alleged he diverted bullets or rendered himself invisible, contributing to successes. Scholarly examination, including analysis of primary sources, suggests these supernatural attributions were largely rhetorical tools in a broader propaganda war rather than indicators of pervasive superstition among Parliamentarian ranks, with Royalist accounts sometimes amplifying the narrative to mock opponents' credulity. No empirical evidence supports the claims, which align with period anxieties over witchcraft but served political demonization of Rupert as a foreign, Catholic-influenced commander.

Legacy and Cultural Impact

As a Military Mascot

Boy served as the mascot for Prince Rupert of the Rhine's Royalist forces during the English Civil War (1642–1651), accompanying the commander into multiple battles and symbolizing loyalty amid the conflict. Royalist soldiers adopted the white hunting poodle, promoting him to the honorary rank of Sergeant-Major-General to foster unit cohesion and morale. This elevation reflected the dog's constant presence at Rupert's side, including in early victories that enhanced his status within the army. Historical records identify Boy as the first official dog in British military service, predating formalized mascot traditions and highlighting early use of animals for psychological reinforcement in warfare. His role underscored poodles' suitability for such duties due to their intelligence and trainability, a trait that persisted in later military applications of the breed from the 17th century onward. Captured and killed at the Battle of Marston Moor on July 2, 1644, Boy's death marked the end of his service but cemented his legacy as an emblem of Cavalier resilience. In the broader context of , Boy exemplified how personal companions could evolve into regimental symbols, influencing subsequent practices that emphasized and esprit de corps without reliance on attributions promoted in Royalist propaganda.

Depictions in Literature and Media

featured extensively in Parliamentarian propaganda literature during the , where pamphlets portrayed the as a demonic to undermine Prince Rupert's reputation. The 1642 satire Observations upon Principe Ruperts white Dogge, called Boye, a ten-page tract, enumerated supposed powers including foretelling outcomes, discovering hidden treasure, and being impervious to weapons, framing Boy as a "Lapland Lady" in canine form allied with witches. These claims drew on contemporary fears of and sorcery, amplified by Rupert's foreign origins and aggressive tactics, though no supported the accusations. Visual depictions in period media reinforced the narrative, with woodcuts in pamphlets showing accompanying Rupert in pillaging or battles, such as a 1643 illustration of the dog amid critiques. A later artwork commemorated Boy's death at the on July 2, 1644, depicting the being shot by a under a witch's , symbolizing the triumph over supposed occultism. In modern media, appears in the 1970 film Cromwell, where the dog is shown carried by Rupert prior to the in 1645, an as Boy had perished the year before; the portrayal used a toy poodle rather than the historical standard hunting breed. Historical analyses, such as Mark Stoyle's 2011 book The Black Legend of Prince Rupert's Dog, examine these propagandistic representations without endorsing their supernatural claims, emphasizing instead their role in .
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.