Hubbry Logo
Breed standardBreed standardMain
Open search
Breed standard
Community hub
Breed standard
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Breed standard
Breed standard
Breed standard
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
First Neapolitan Mastiff dog breed standard, 1946

In animal husbandry or animal fancy, a breed standard is a description of the characteristics of a hypothetical or ideal example of a breed.[1]: xix  The description may include physical or morphological detail, genetic criteria, or criteria of athletic or productive performance.[citation needed] It may also describe faults or deficiencies that would disqualify an animal from registration or from reproduction.[1]: xix  The hypothetical ideal example may be called a "breed type".[citation needed]

Breed standards are devised by breed associations or breed clubs, not by individuals, and are written to reflect the use or purpose of the species and breed of the animal. Breed standards help define the ideal animal of a breed and provide goals for breeders in improving stock. In essence a breed standard is a blueprint for an animal fit for the function it was bred - i.e. herding, tracking etc.[2] Breed standards are not scientific documents, and may vary from association to association, and from country to country, even for the same species and breed. There is no one format for breed standards across all species, and breed standards do change and are updated over time.[2]

Contents of a breed standard

[edit]
Body and head proportions, Boxer dog breed standard illustration

Breed standards cover the externally observable qualities of the animal such as appearance, movement, and temperament. The exact format of the breed standard varies, as breed standards are not scientific documents and change as the needs of the members of the organization which authors them change. In general, a breed standard may include history of the breed, a narrative description of the breed, and details of the ideal externally observable structure and behavior for the breed. Certain deviations from the standard are considered faults. A large degree of deviation from the breed standard, an excess of faults, or certain defined major faults, may indicate that the animal should not be bred, although its fitness for other uses may not be impeded by the faults. An animal that closely matches (conforms to) the breed standard for its species and breed is said to have good conformation.

Examples of use

[edit]

In the American Poultry Association breed standards for poultry, for example, ducks and geese are divided by weight, and chicken breeds are divided by size. Chickens are also divided into egg laying, meat, and ornamental varieties.[3] In cattle, breed standards allow for comparisons and the selection of the best breeds to raise.[4]

There is breed standard for dogs, cats, horses, chicken breeds, and others. The standard is used as a comparative parameter for judging animals in conformation shows competitions.[5]

Regulation

[edit]

Some species have international governing bodies that attempt to regulate the terminology and format of breed standards internationally, but, even where such international agreement exists, not all associations for that species necessarily belong to the international governing body. The Federation Cynologique Internationale regulates breed standards for dogs internationally, but the largest dog registry, the American Kennel Club, does not belong to the international body and uses its own breed standard format.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Breed standard

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A breed standard is a detailed, written description of the ideal characteristics of a specific breed, encompassing physical appearance, movement, , and functional traits to represent the breed's hypothetical perfect specimen. These standards originated in the for dogs, drawing from breeders' experiences to preserve unique traits and original working roles, such as or . In practice, breed standards guide to ensure consistency across generations, support animal registration in registries, and provide criteria for judging in conformation shows where animals are evaluated against the ideal. They emphasize balance, proportion, and health, assigning point values to features like head shape, body structure, coat quality, and color to quantify adherence, while specifying faults or disqualifications for deviations such as structural abnormalities or incorrect markings. For instance, in dogs, standards detail elements from general appearance and gait to disqualifying traits like or poor , promoting both aesthetic and functional excellence. Breed standards apply across species, including companion animals like cats—where they describe abstract ideals of form and pattern for show evaluation—and such as , focusing on traits like color, horn presence, and body conformation for registration and production goals. In , they outline refined head profiles, leg structure, and movement suited to disciplines like or , as seen in breeds like the . Overall, these standards foster breed preservation by registries such as the for dogs, The Cat Fanciers' Association for cats, and breed-specific associations for and , balancing tradition with welfare considerations.

Definition and Purpose

Definition

A breed standard in and fancy is a formal, detailed set of guidelines that outlines the ideal physical, behavioral, and functional characteristics of a specific of domesticated animal, such as dogs, cats, horses, or . These standards provide a comprehensive written description of traits like conformation, , movement, and utility, serving as a blueprint for breeders to produce animals that conform to the breed's defining features. For instance, in dogs, the standard specifies aspects such as size, coat quality, and to preserve the breed's purpose and identity. This concept is distinct from related terms like "breed type," which refers informally to the overall form, appearance, and inherent qualities that allow quick identification of a without a formal , and "pedigree," which is simply a recorded documenting an animal's ancestry to verify status. standards are inherently specific to individual breeds within domesticated , excluding wild animals or plants, where no such guidelines apply. A key element is their role as an objective benchmark for evaluation in breeding programs, shows, and registrations, ensuring consistency and within the breed.

Purpose

The primary goals of breed standards are to preserve the purity and integrity of specific breeds of domesticated animals by defining the ideal physical, behavioral, and functional traits that distinguish them from others. These standards guide selective breeding practices, ensuring that breeders prioritize traits aligned with the breed's original purpose while avoiding the propagation of genetic health issues through disqualifying faults and clear criteria for acceptable variations. Additionally, they standardize characteristics to enable fair and consistent evaluation in competitions, such as conformation shows, where animals are judged against a uniform benchmark. Breed standards provide significant benefits in educating breeders, judges, and owners about the essential qualities of a breed, fostering informed decision-making that supports ethical practices. They promote responsible ownership by emphasizing the welfare of animals, including screenings for heritable conditions and the avoidance of exaggerated features that could compromise well-being. Furthermore, adherence to these standards facilitates international recognition of breeds, as organizations like the (FCI) for dogs and (TICA) for cats use them to establish global consistency in breed archetypes and prevent health-detrimental exaggerations. A key role of breed standards is to prevent the dilution of breed characteristics through uncontrolled crossbreeding, by clearly delineating acceptable traits and excluding deviations that could erode the breed's unique identity. They achieve this while intentionally balancing aesthetics, functionality, and health—for instance, in working breeds like dogs or , where utility in tasks such as or meat production is prioritized over mere appearance to ensure overall robustness. This holistic approach helps maintain breeds that are not only visually distinctive but also capable of fulfilling their intended roles without undue health risks.

Historical Development

Origins

The origins of breed standards trace back to advancements in agricultural practices during the Enlightenment and the , when emerged as a systematic method to improve for enhanced productivity and economic value. In the mid-18th century, British agriculturalist Robert Bakewell pioneered and selective mating techniques at his Dishley farm, focusing on traits like meat yield and wool quality in sheep and to meet the demands of growing urban populations. These methods formalized earlier informal knowledge of , laying the groundwork for standardized breeding criteria that emphasized purity and uniformity in lines. By the , these principles extended to companion animals, particularly dogs, amid the Victorian era's fascination with organized exhibitions and . The earliest formalized standards arose in , driven by the need to codify desirable traits for emerging dog shows, with the first such event held in Newcastle in 1859. The founding of in on April 4, 1873, by Sewallis Evelyn Shirley and twelve other gentlemen marked a pivotal moment, as it established the world's first national and registry to promote breed uniformity and regulate shows. This organization formalized informal breeding practices inherited from agricultural traditions, motivated by the era's enthusiasm for pedigreed dogs as symbols of status and scientific progress. Key figures and institutions further propelled these early standards. Vero Shaw, a prominent canine authority, contributed significantly through his 1881 publication The Illustrated Book of the Dog, which provided detailed descriptions and illustrations that influenced breed ideals for varieties like setters and terriers, assisting breeders in achieving consistency. Across the Atlantic, the (AKC) was founded in 1884 by representatives from 13 breed clubs, adopting similar standards to track pedigrees and sanction exhibitions, thereby pioneering organized in the United States. These developments reflected a broader shift from utilitarian livestock improvement to aesthetic and functional specifications for dogs, setting the template for future breed documentation.

Evolution Over Time

Following the establishment of early breed standards in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, significant expansions occurred in the mid-20th century, particularly after , as the war had severely impacted dog populations through population bottlenecks and loss of in many breeds, prompting kennel clubs to prioritize recovery and sustainability. Awareness of and genetic considerations grew with advances in veterinary science, though major incorporations into standards emphasizing sound structure to prevent hereditary diseases occurred later, marking a shift from purely aesthetic ideals to functional . In the late 20th century and into the , breed standards underwent further shifts toward emphasizing , driven by growing awareness of conformation-related health issues, including those in brachycephalic breeds like bulldogs and pugs. This period saw increased scrutiny from veterinary associations and welfare advocates, who highlighted how exaggerated traits—such as shortened muzzles—contributed to brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS) and other disorders, prompting revisions to discourage extreme morphologies. Organizations responded by updating standards to prioritize balanced proportions and functionality over appearance, with examples including the Kennel Club's () 2021 revisions that penalize extreme flat faces in French Bulldogs to mitigate welfare risks. These changes reflected broader societal pressures and linking practices to reduced and in affected dogs. More recent developments include Norway's 2022 ban on breeding unhealthy dogs, such as certain brachycephalic breeds, and the 2025 Puppy Protection Act in the , which aims to enhance welfare standards for breeders. In the digital era since the 2000s, breed standards have benefited from online revisions and global efforts, enabling faster updates and broader accessibility through platforms maintained by bodies like the FCI and AKC. The FCI, founded in 1911 to unify international cynology and standardize breed criteria across member nations, has continued this work with ongoing amendments, such as those incorporating genetic health guidelines to address breed-specific vulnerabilities. Digital tools, including the FCI's online nomenclature database and launched in , facilitate real-time access to revised standards in multiple languages, supporting by aligning national variations under a common framework. Similarly, the AKC's has digitized historical standards while allowing parent clubs to propose welfare-focused updates, such as disqualifications for severe exaggerations, promoting consistent global application. These efforts have accelerated responses to emerging health data, ensuring standards evolve collaboratively across borders.

Key Components

Physical Characteristics

Physical characteristics in breed standards form the core of a dog's ideal conformation, outlining the anatomical features that define a breed's appearance and functionality. These standards, developed by organizations like the (AKC), emphasize traits that support the breed's historical purpose, such as endurance for working dogs or for hunters, ensuring that physical form aligns with practical utility. Size specifications typically include height at the and weight ranges, tailored to the breed's role; for instance, breeds like the are described as medium-sized with males measuring 18-20 inches and females 17-19 inches to facilitate swift, tireless movement across varied terrain. Proportions address body ratios, such as the length-to-height balance, often aiming for a rectangular outline in sporting breeds to promote efficient , or a more square build in guardians for stability. Head and skull features detail the cranial and facial structure, including eye shape, ear set, and muzzle length; the Afghan Hound standard, for example, specifies almond-shaped eyes that are nearly triangular and dark, contributing to its alert expression suited for sighting game in rugged landscapes. Coat and color variations are precisely defined to reflect environmental adaptations, such as the dense, weather-resistant double coat of herding dogs like the , which includes a harsh outer layer and soft undercoat for protection during outdoor work, with permissible shades like black, brown, or blue merle. and movement evaluate the dog's locomotion, prioritizing smooth, efficient strides—such as the free and powerful trot of the , with its outreaching forelegs and strong hindquarter drive, essential for covering ground while controlling . Standards also identify faults and disqualifications to exclude traits that compromise health or type, such as overshot or undershot jaws that impair biting function, or non-standard colors like excessive white in certain breeds, which could indicate genetic issues; severe faults, including or monorchidism, result in automatic disqualification from breeding or shows. These elements collectively ensure that physical characteristics not only preserve aesthetic ideals but also promote breeds capable of fulfilling their original tasks without exaggeration that could lead to welfare concerns.

Temperament and Behavior

Breed standards typically include sections on temperament and behavior that outline the ideal personality traits, instincts, and responses expected of the breed, ensuring alignment with its historical function and suitability as a companion or worker. These descriptions emphasize qualities such as , sociability, and stability, which help breeders and judges evaluate dogs for mental soundness alongside physical form. For instance, the (AKC) standards stress that is a hallmark of the breed, integral to its overall character. Ideal temperaments vary by breed group but are often tied to original working purposes; sporting breeds like the Labrador Retriever are described as kindly, outgoing, and biddable, with a strong drive to retrieve game gently using a "soft mouth" to avoid damaging fowl, reflecting their historical role in hunting. Similarly, the Golden Retriever standard calls for a friendly, reliable, and trustworthy disposition, intelligent and eager to please, supporting their use in retrieving and as versatile family dogs. In contrast, guard breeds such as the German Shepherd exhibit a distinct personality marked by self-confidence, fearlessness without hostility, and a poised, cheerful obedience, enabling protective instincts while maintaining control in everyday situations. Standards also incorporate expectations for adaptability, trainability, and social compatibility, promoting dogs that integrate well into human households and with other animals. For example, the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) standard for the Golden Retriever specifies a biddable, kindly, and confident nature with natural working ability, highlighting trainability for tasks like obedience and therapy work, alongside friendliness toward people and non-aggression toward other dogs. These traits ensure the breed's versatility, from family pets to service roles, while fostering stable interactions in diverse environments. Disqualifying behaviors in breed standards focus on extremes that compromise safety or functionality, such as unprovoked or excessive , which are penalized or lead to disqualification in evaluations. The AKC views quarrelsomeness, hostility, or unwarranted timidity as serious faults in breeds like the , undermining the desired stable character. Likewise, FCI guidelines mandate disqualification for uncontrolled aggressive behavior or panic-driven flight responses, as these indicate poor mental soundness unfit for the breed's purpose.

Creation and Regulation

Responsible Organizations

, established in the United Kingdom in 1873, serves as the primary national body responsible for maintaining breed standards for dogs in the UK and influencing global practices through its historical role in standardizing registrations and shows. As a centralized , it oversees the development and ownership of breed standards, ensuring they reflect historical, , and criteria for recognized breeds. In the United States, the (AKC), founded in , acts as the leading national registry and custodian of breed standards, where each recognized breed is supported by a dedicated parent club that proposes, debates, and approves standards before submission for official adoption. These parent clubs, comprising breeders and enthusiasts, form the structure for standard maintenance, focusing on physical and behavioral ideals specific to each breed. On an international level, the , created in 1911 and headquartered in , coordinates breed standards across 100 members and contract partners (one from each country) as of November 2024, promoting unified cynological practices while deferring to national kennel clubs for local adaptations. The FCI's role emphasizes harmonization, with its standards serving as a reference for global recognition and events, distinct from purely national bodies like or AKC. For cats, the Cat Fanciers' Association (CFA), a prominent international registry founded in 1906, authors and updates breed standards through breed councils composed of registered breeders, covering coat, structure, and personality traits for over 40 recognized breeds. Similarly, the (UKC), established in 1898 in the United States, maintains breed standards with a focus on working and performance abilities, particularly for and dogs, and involves breed-specific committees in their revision to prioritize functionality over conformation alone. For horses and livestock, breed standards are typically developed and maintained by specialized national or breed-specific associations. For example, the (AQHA) oversees standards for the , emphasizing conformation, , and traits. In cattle breeding, organizations like the American Angus Association establish standards for breeds such as , focusing on traits like color, body structure, and production qualities for registration and evaluation.

Development Process

The development of a breed standard typically begins with the breed's parent club, a dedicated organization of breeders, judges, and enthusiasts, which forms a committee to draft or revise the standard. This committee draws on historical records of the breed's origins, expert consultations with veterinarians and geneticists, and observations of current breed populations to ensure the standard reflects the breed's essential characteristics, health, and functionality. For instance, the (AKC) requires parent clubs to notify AKC staff early in the process and submit drafts for preliminary input, emphasizing clarity and consistency in descriptions of physical traits and . Revisions to existing standards are triggered by emerging evidence such as genetic research revealing hereditary issues, longitudinal studies identifying population-wide concerns, or shifts in breed demographics that affect type preservation. Major updates often occur every 5 to 10 years, though minor clarifications may arise more frequently from member petitions or standardization efforts. In the , periodically reviews standards for terminology consistency, incorporating veterinary expertise to address welfare implications without altering core breed ideals. Approval mechanisms involve multiple layers of to balance with . Proposed changes are typically circulated for public comment, such as a 60-day period in the AKC , followed by voting among the parent club's membership according to its bylaws. Breed councils or committees then review the results, with final ratification by the national 's board of directors, ensuring broad consensus. The Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) employs a similar tiered approach for international standards, starting with national submissions and culminating in approval after provisional testing. Once approved, standards are documented in official registries and publications, with version histories maintained to track evolution. The AKC, for example, publishes revised standards in its and illustrated guides, imposing a five-year moratorium on further changes to allow stabilization. This documentation serves as the authoritative reference for breeders and judges, promoting uniform application across shows and breeding programs.

Applications

Breeding Practices

Breed standards serve as a foundational in , guiding to choose mating pairs that align closely with the ideal physical, temperamental, and functional traits outlined in the standard. This prioritization enhances desirable characteristics, such as proper conformation and working ability, while minimizing genetic faults like structural weaknesses or inherited predispositions. For instance, evaluate potential sires and dams against the standard to ensure complementary genetics, thereby increasing the likelihood of offspring that embody the breed's type. Health considerations are deeply integrated into breed standards, often mandating or recommending screenings to safeguard against common hereditary conditions. Many standards, particularly for large breeds like Retrievers or German Shepherds, recommend hip and elbow evaluations to detect early, preventing the propagation of painful orthopedic issues. These tests, conducted via radiographic imaging and scored by veterinary bodies, inform breeding decisions, with only dogs achieving acceptable ratings selected for pairing. Ethical breeding practices emphasize restraint in pursuing exaggerated features that prioritize aesthetics over welfare, as outlined in standards from organizations like the and the . Breeders are urged to avoid mating dogs with extreme traits, such as overly short muzzles in brachycephalic breeds, which can lead to respiratory distress and reduced lifespan; instead, selections favor moderate conformations that support natural movement and vitality. This approach mitigates welfare risks associated with overbreeding for show-ring appeal, promoting and long-term breed sustainability. The outcomes of standard-guided breeding include the consistent production of "true-to-type" litters, where puppies closely match the breed's prototypical form and function. Resulting pedigrees explicitly reference the governing standard, providing a verifiable lineage that traces adherence to these ideals across generations. This process not only preserves breed integrity but also yields healthier animals with fewer conformational deviations, as evidenced by programs like the AKC's Bred with H.E.A.R.T. initiative, which certifies breeders committed to such standards. Similar principles apply to breeding cats, where standards guide selection for coat patterns and temperament, and livestock like , emphasizing traits for production efficiency.

Conformation Shows

Conformation shows serve as competitive platforms where dogs are evaluated against their respective standards to assess how closely they embody the for breeding and exhibition purposes. These events, sanctioned by organizations like the (AKC), emphasize the dog's overall structure, movement, and as defined in the standard, allowing judges to identify exemplars that promote and uniformity. Similar events exist for cats through organizations like The Cat Fanciers' Association, focusing on form, pattern, and movement. Judging in conformation shows revolves around a comparative assessment where each dog is measured against the breed standard rather than directly against competitors, focusing on proportions, , and conformation details outlined in the standard. While AKC rules do not mandate a universal numerical point system for individual evaluations, many breed standards include weighted guidelines to prioritize key traits; for instance, general appearance often receives significant emphasis, sometimes up to 50% of the total evaluation in illustrative scales provided for certain breeds. Judges examine dogs individually and in groups, awarding placements based on adherence to these criteria, with the goal of selecting dogs that best represent the breed's functional and aesthetic ideals. The structure of a typical conformation show organizes competitions into classes divided by age, , and experience level, such as puppy classes for dogs 6-9 months or 9-12 months, open classes for non-champions, and special classes for champions. Winners from these classes—designated as Winners Dog or Winners Bitch—advance to compete for Best of Breed, with the top breed winners then progressing to group judging across seven categories (e.g., Sporting, ), culminating in the Best in Show selection. In horse shows, breed standards guide evaluations of conformation and movement for disciplines like . Faults are penalized according to their severity as described in the breed standard, with minor deviations—such as slight deviations in ear set—resulting in lower placements through comparative deduction, while major faults like an incorrect bite (e.g., overshot or undershot in breeds like ) can lead to disqualification if they severely compromise the dog's functionality or type. Disqualifications are reserved for serious defects explicitly listed in the standard or rules, ensuring only sound specimens advance. A prominent global example is the , first held in at Gilmore's Garden in , which remains a benchmark event for evaluating over 2,500 dogs annually against AKC breed standards in a prestigious all-breed format.

Variations and Challenges

International Differences

Breed standards for dogs vary significantly across international kennel organizations, reflecting differing priorities in functionality, , and cultural contexts. The (FCI), which oversees standards in 100 countries primarily in and beyond, emphasizes working ability, health, and natural movement in its breed descriptions, aiming to preserve breeds' original utilitarian purposes. In contrast, the (AKC) in the United States places greater focus on conformational and visual , often prioritizing show-ring presentation over performance traits. These philosophical differences lead to divergent interpretations of ideal physical traits, influencing breeding practices and eligibility globally. A prominent example is the Dog, where FCI standards (Standard No. 166) describe the back as "straight, strong, and well-muscled," with a that is "long and gradually sloping" at approximately 23 degrees to promote efficient trotting and endurance for and work. The AKC standard, however, allows for a more pronounced slope in the topline from to , stating it should be "firm, smooth, and sloping" to achieve a "smooth, flowing ," which has resulted in American show lines exhibiting steeper angulation compared to European working lines. This variance has sparked debates on breed health, as excessive slope in AKC-influenced dogs may contribute to mobility issues, though both organizations claim their standards support . Recognition discrepancies further complicate international consistency, as not all kennel clubs accept the same breeds as purebreds. The (UKC) recognizes over 300 breeds, including some like the that are not fully acknowledged by the AKC, allowing them to compete in UKC events but often relegating them to the AKC's Miscellaneous Class—a temporary category for breeds in the Service awaiting full recognition after demonstrating a sufficient population and . This leads to fragmented pedigrees and limited cross-border competition for affected breeds. Efforts toward harmonization have been pursued by the FCI since the 1990s through systematic translations of breed standards into four official languages (English, French, German, and Spanish), ensuring uniform interpretation among its member countries and reducing ambiguities in judging at international shows. Mutual recognition agreements between FCI members facilitate the acceptance of pedigrees and titles across borders, promoting global consistency while respecting national origins of standards. Cultural influences shape standards in regions like , where the Japan Kennel Club (JKC) incorporates local adaptations for native breeds to reflect historical roles in rugged terrains. For instance, the Akita Inu standard emphasizes a sturdy build, curled tail, and alert expression suited to Japan's mountainous traditions, designating it as a national since to preserve indigenous traits amid Western breed introductions. Similarly, the Shiba Inu's compact, agile form in JKC guidelines prioritizes fox-hunting prowess in dense forests, diverging from more aesthetic-focused Western interpretations of spitz-type dogs.

Criticisms

Breed standards have faced significant criticism for promoting physical extremes that compromise canine health, particularly in breeds selected for exaggerated features. For instance, standards emphasizing short muzzles in brachycephalic breeds like Bulldogs and Pugs have led to brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS), causing , , and reduced exercise capacity. These conformational traits, prioritized in judging criteria, increase the risk of secondary issues such as eye and dental overcrowding, often requiring surgical interventions to improve welfare. Another major concern is the erosion of genetic diversity within purebred populations, driven by the strict conformity demands of breed standards. Selective breeding to meet these ideals has resulted in population bottlenecks, with studies showing an average loss of 35% of genetic variation during breed formation and ongoing inbreeding that heightens susceptibility to hereditary diseases. This overemphasis on uniformity reduces adaptability and resilience, exacerbating health vulnerabilities across generations as breeders prioritize appearance over broad genetic health. Critics also highlight inclusivity shortcomings, as breed standards inherently exclude mixed-breed dogs and modern hybrids from formal recognition and participation in events like conformation shows. This rigid classification system marginalizes crossbreeds, which are often argued to benefit from hybrid vigor and greater —potentially leading to better outcomes in some cases—while reinforcing a that favors purebreds despite their elevated health risks. Such exclusion perpetuates welfare disparities by limiting access to certain breeding programs and veterinary resources tailored for recognized breeds. As of , recent studies have challenged the universality of hybrid vigor benefits in mixed-breed dogs, noting they may still carry disorders. In response to these issues, reform movements have gained traction, including the UK Kennel Club's 2010 revisions following the Bateson Inquiry, which updated standards for over 70 breeds to mitigate exaggerations and emphasize welfare. Advocates further call for shifting toward performance-based standards that prioritize functional and over , arguing that this would better align breeding with dogs' natural capabilities and long-term viability. Recent studies reinforce this push, urging a reevaluation of appearance-driven practices to safeguard welfare amid growing evidence of their detrimental impacts. As of 2025, ongoing reforms include European legislative efforts to restrict breeding of extreme traits, building on prior inquiries.

References

  1. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/dog-breeds/purebred-dog-breed-standard/
  2. https://cfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/24-25standards.pdf
  3. https://aberdeen-angus-breeders.com/breed-standard
  4. https://www.uslusitano.org/index.php/usla/lusitano-info/lusitano-breed-standard
  5. https://americanromney.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ARBA-current-breed-standard-with-recommendations-for-review.pdf
  6. https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/breed-standards/about-breed-standards/
  7. https://www.akc.org/about/glossary/
  8. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/dog-breeding/type-the-breeders-foundation/
  9. https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/getting-a-dog/are-you-ready/what-is-a-pedigree-dog/
  10. https://www.britannica.com/animal/cat
  11. https://cfa.org/cat-talk/playing-feline-matchmaker/
  12. https://www.aspca.org/about-us/aspca-policy-and-position-statements/position-statement-criteria-responsible-breeding
  13. https://www.fci.be/en/
  14. https://tica.org/
  15. https://fve.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/059_Extreme_breeding_Final_adopted.pdf
  16. https://www.ars.usda.gov/plains-area/miles-city-mt/larrl/docs/genetics-history/
  17. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/tc3-boundless-worldhistory/chapter/the-agricultural-revolution/
  18. https://gwern.net/review/bakewell
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1950109/
  20. https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/about-us/campaigns/150-years-of-the-kennel-club/the-kennel-club-timeline-1800s/
  21. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/708568
  22. http://www.irishwolfhounds.org/shaw.htm
  23. https://www.akc.org/about/history/
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3384140/
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5508944/
  26. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10266823/French-bulldogs-bred-deformed-flat-faces-penalised-dog-shows.html
  27. https://theconversation.com/vets-can-do-more-to-reduce-the-suffering-of-flat-faced-dog-breeds-110702
  28. https://www.holidays4dogs.co.uk/the-future-of-dog-breeding/
  29. https://iacpdogs.org/2025/11/10/the-puppy-protection-act-of-2025/
  30. https://www.fci.be/en/History-of-the-FCI-1.html
  31. https://www.facebook.com/fci4pedigreedogs/videos/fci-breed-standards-app/470901111000748/
  32. https://www.akc.org/about/archive/digital-collections/
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51493187_Rules_regulations_strategies_and_activities_within_the_Federation_Cynologique_Internationale_FCI_to_promote_canine_genetic_health
  34. https://images.akc.org/pdf/judges/groups/Herding_Group.pdf
  35. https://images.akc.org/pdf/breeds/standards/AfghanHound.pdf
  36. https://images.akc.org/pdf/breeds/standards/GermanShepherdDog.pdf
  37. https://new.kinoloska.si/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/50-2013-annex-en_september2013.pdf
  38. https://images.akc.org/pdf/breeds/standards/LabradorRetriever.pdf
  39. https://images.akc.org/pdf/breeds/standards/GoldenRetriever.pdf
  40. https://www.dogsglobal.com/breeds/golden-retriever/FCI-standard
  41. https://www.fci.be/medias/JUG-BSI-en-19932.pdf
  42. https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/about-us/about-the-kennel-club/history-of-the-kennel-club/
  43. https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/breed-standards/
  44. https://www.akc.org/
  45. https://www.fci.be/en/Presentation-of-our-organisation-4.html
  46. https://www.fci.be/en/members/
  47. https://cfa.org/
  48. https://cfa.org/breeds/
  49. https://www.ukcdogs.com/breeds
  50. https://www.aqha.com/
  51. https://www.angus.org/
  52. https://www.akc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Guidelines-for-Writing-Breed-Standards-4.30.2020.pdf
  53. https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/media-centre/2024/october/kennel-club-breed-standards-reviewed-to-ensure-clarity-and-consistency/
  54. https://www.fci.be/medias/FCI-REG-RGT-PNR-ANN-005-en-10686.pdf
  55. https://www.akc.org/breeder-programs/breeder-education/akcs-guide-responsible-dog-breeding/
  56. https://www.akc.org/breeder-programs/breed-health-testing-requirements/
  57. https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-11/aw_platform_plat-conc_guide_dog-breeding.pdf
  58. https://kb.rspca.org.au/knowledge-base/what-can-breeders-do-to-avoid-exaggerated-physical-features-that-compromise-dog-welfare/
  59. https://www.akc.org/breeder-programs/akc-bred-with-heart-program/requirements/
  60. https://www.akc.org/sports/conformation/
  61. https://www.westminsterkennelclub.org/dog-shows/
  62. https://www.akc.org/sports/conformation/judging-information/
  63. https://www.akc.org/sports/conformation/resources/faq/
  64. https://www.akc.org/sports/conformation/resources/select-conformation-dog-show-class/
  65. https://images.akc.org/pdf/rulebooks/RREGS3.pdf
  66. https://www.westminsterkennelclub.org/about-us/history/
  67. https://healthtopics.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/health-topics/brachycephalic-short-nosed-dogs
  68. https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/health-and-dog-care/what-we-do-for-dog-health/brachycephalic-dogs/
  69. https://academic.oup.com/genetics/article/181/4/1493/6053977
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090023311002309
  71. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27387730/
  72. https://news.vin.com/default.aspx?pid=210&Id=12402914
  73. https://bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1136/vr.g5593
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11011023/
  75. https://www.veterinary-practice.com/2025/new-study-calls-for-dog-breeding-practices-to-put-welfare-over-appearance
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.