Hubbry Logo
CattleCattleMain
Open search
Cattle
Community hub
Cattle
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Cattle
Cattle
Cattle
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cattle
A brown Swiss Fleckvieh cow wearing a cowbell
Domesticated
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Family: Bovidae
Subfamily: Bovinae
Genus: Bos
Species:
B. taurus
Binomial name
Bos taurus
Bovine distribution
Synonyms
  • Bos primigenius taurus
  • Bos longifrons

Cattle (Bos taurus) are large, domesticated, bovid ungulates widely kept as livestock. They are prominent modern members of the subfamily Bovinae and the most widespread species of the genus Bos. Mature female cattle are called cows and mature male cattle are bulls. Young female cattle are called heifers, young male cattle are bullocks, and castrated male cattle are known as oxen or steers.

Cattle are commonly raised for meat, for dairy products, and for leather. As draft animals, they pull carts and farm implements. Cattle are considered sacred animals within Hinduism, and it is illegal to kill them in some Indian states. Small breeds such as the miniature Zebu are kept as pets.

Taurine cattle are widely distributed across Europe and temperate areas of Asia, the Americas, and Australia. Zebus are found mainly in India and tropical areas of Asia, America, and Australia. Sanga cattle are found primarily in sub-Saharan Africa. These types, sometimes classified as separate species or subspecies, are further divided into over 1,000 recognized breeds.

Around 10,500 years ago, taurine cattle were domesticated from wild aurochs progenitors in central Anatolia, the Levant and Western Iran. A separate domestication event occurred in the Indian subcontinent, which gave rise to zebu. There were over 940 million cattle in the world by 2022. Cattle are responsible for around 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions. They were one of the first domesticated animals to have a fully-mapped genome.

Etymology

[edit]
Further information: List of cattle terminology

The term cattle was borrowed from Anglo-Norman catel (replacing native Old English terms like kine, now considered archaic, poetic, or dialectal),[1] itself from Medieval Latin capitāle 'principal sum of money, capital', itself derived in turn from Latin caput 'head'. Cattle originally meant movable personal property, especially livestock of any kind, as opposed to real property (the land, which also included wild or small free-roaming animals such as chickens—they were sold as part of the land).[2] The word is a variant of chattel (a unit of personal property) and closely related to capital in the economic sense.[3][2] The word cow came via Old English cū (plural cȳ), from Proto-Indo-European *gʷṓws (genitive *gʷéws) 'a bovine animal', cf. Persian: gâv, Sanskrit: gó.[4] In older English sources such as the King James Version of the Bible, cattle often means livestock, as opposed to deer, which are wild.[2]

Characteristics

[edit]

Description

[edit]
Skeleton
Anatomical model, showing the large 4-chambered stomach

Cattle are large artiodactyls, mammals with cloven hooves, meaning that they walk on two toes, the third and fourth digits. Like all bovid species, they can have horns, which are unbranched and are not shed annually.[5] Coloration varies with breed; common colors are black, white, and red/brown, and some breeds are spotted or have mixed colors.[6] Bulls are larger than cows of the same breed by up to a few hundred kilograms. British Hereford cows, for example, weigh 600–800 kg (1,300–1,800 lb), while the bulls weigh 1,000–1,200 kg (2,200–2,600 lb).[7] Before 1790, beef cattle averaged only 160 kg (350 lb) net. Thereafter, weights climbed steadily.[8][9] Cattle breeds vary widely in size; the tallest and heaviest is the Chianina, where a mature bull may be up to 1.8 m (5 ft 11 in) at the shoulder, and may reach 1,280 kg (2,820 lb) in weight.[10] The natural life of domestic cattle is some 25–30 years. Beef cattle go to slaughter at around 18 months, and dairy cows at about five years.[11]

Digestive system

[edit]
Further information: Digestive system of ruminants
Bacteria dominate the rumen microbiome; composition can change substantially with diet.[12]

Cattle are ruminants, meaning their digestive system is highly specialized for processing plant material such as grass rich in cellulose, a tough carbohydrate polymer which many animals cannot digest. They do this in symbiosis with micro-organisms – bacteria, fungi, and protozoa – that possess cellulases, enzymes that split cellulose into its constituent sugars. Among the many bacteria that contribute are Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminococcus albus. Cellulolytic fungi include several species of Neocallimastix, while the protozoa include the ciliates Eudiplodinium maggie and Ostracodinium album.[13] If the animal's feed changes over time, the composition of this microbiome changes in response.[12]

Cattle have one large stomach with four compartments; the rumen, reticulum, omasum, and abomasum. The rumen is the largest compartment and it harbours the most important parts of the microbiome.[12] The reticulum, the smallest compartment, is known as the "honeycomb". The omasum's main function is to absorb water and nutrients from the digestible feed. The abomasum has a similar function to the human stomach.[14]

Cattle regurgitate and re-chew their food in the process of chewing the cud, like most ruminants. While feeding, cows swallow their food without chewing; it goes into the rumen for storage. Later, the food is regurgitated to the mouth, a mouthful at a time, where the cud is chewed by the molars, grinding down the coarse vegetation to small particles. The cud is then swallowed again and further digested by the micro-organisms in the cow's stomach.[14]

Reproduction

[edit]
Nine sequential photos showing the calf being born
A cow giving birth

The gestation period for a cow is about nine months long. The ratio of male to female offspring at birth is approximately 52:48.[15] A cow's udder has two pairs of mammary glands or teats.[16] Farms often use artificial insemination, the artificial deposition of semen in the female's genital tract; this allows farmers to choose from a wide range of bulls to breed their cattle. Estrus too may be artificially induced to facilitate the process.[17] Copulation lasts several seconds and consists of a single pelvic thrust.[18]

Cows seek secluded areas for calving.[19] Semi-wild Highland cattle heifers first give birth at 2 or 3 years of age, and the timing of birth is synchronized with increases in natural food quality. Average calving interval is 391 days, and calving mortality within the first year of life is 5%.[20] Beef calves suckle an average of 5 times per day, spending some 46 minutes suckling. There is a diurnal rhythm in suckling, peaking at roughly 6am, 11:30am, and 7pm.[21] Under natural conditions, calves stay with their mother until weaning at 8 to 11 months. Heifer and bull calves are equally attached to their mothers in the first few months of life.[22]

Cognition

[edit]
Individual cattle differ in personality traits such as fearfulness and sociability.[23]

Cattle have a variety of cognitive abilities. They can memorize the locations of multiple food sources,[24] and can retain memories for at least 48 days.[25] Young cattle learn more quickly than adults,[26] and calves are capable of discrimination learning,[27] distinguishing familiar and unfamiliar animals,[28] and between humans, using faces and other cues.[29] Calves prefer their own mother's vocalizations to those of an unfamiliar cow.[30] Vocalizations provide information on the age, sex, dominance status and reproductive status of the caller, and may indicate estrus in cows and competitive display in bulls.[31] Cows can categorize images as familiar and unfamiliar individuals.[28] Cloned calves from the same donor form subgroups, suggesting that kin discrimination may be a basis of grouping behaviour.[32] Cattle use visual/brain lateralisation when scanning novel and familiar stimuli.[33] They prefer to view novel stimuli with the left eye (using the right brain hemisphere), but the right eye for familiar stimuli.[34] Individual cattle have also been observed to display different personality traits, such as fearfulness and sociability.[23]

Senses

[edit]

Vision is the dominant sense; cattle obtain almost half of their information visually.[35] Being prey animals, cattle evolved to look out for predators almost all around, with eyes that are on the sides of their head rather than the front. This gives them a field of view of 330°, but limits binocular vision (and therefore stereopsis) to some 30° to 50°, compared to 140° in humans.[28] They are dichromatic, like most mammals.[36] Cattle avoid bitter-tasting foods, selecting sweet foods for energy. Their sensitivity to sour-tasting foods helps them to maintain optimal ruminal pH.[35] They seek out salty foods by taste and smell to maintain their electrolyte balance.[37] Their hearing is better than that of horses,[38] but worse at localising sounds than goats, and much worse than dogs or humans.[39] They can distinguish between live and recorded human speech.[40] Olfaction probably plays a large role in their social life, indicating social and reproductive status.[35][41] Cattle can tell when other animals are stressed by smelling the alarm chemicals in their urine.[42] Cattle can be trained to recognise conspecific individuals using olfaction only.[41]

Behavior

[edit]

Dominance hierarchy

[edit]
Spectators in Oman watch a fight between bulls.

Cattle live in a dominance hierarchy. This is maintained in several ways. Cattle often engage in mock fights where they test each other's strength in a non-aggressive way. Licking is primarily performed by subordinates and received by dominant animals. Mounting is a playful behavior shown by calves of both sexes and by bulls and sometimes by cows in estrus,[43] however, this is not a dominance related behavior as has been found in other species.[20] Dominance-associated aggressiveness does not correlate with rank position, but is closely related to rank distance between individuals.[20] The horns of cattle are used in mate selection. Horned cattle attempt to keep greater distances between themselves and have fewer physical interactions than hornless cattle, resulting in more stable social relationships.[44] In calves, agonistic behavior becomes less frequent as space allowance increases, but not as group size changes, whereas in adults, the number of agonistic encounters increases with group size.[45]

Dominance relationships in semi-wild highland cattle are very firm, with few overt aggressive conflicts: most disputes are settled by agonistic (non-aggressive, competitive) behaviors with no physical contact between opponents, reducing the risk of injury. Dominance status depends on age and sex, with older animals usually dominant to young ones and males dominant to females. Young bulls gain superior dominance status over adult cows when they reach about 2 years of age.[20]

Grazing behavior

[edit]
A Charolais bull grazing
Cows and calves grazing in a pasture in Ystad 2025.

Cattle eat mixed diets, but prefer to eat approximately 70% clover and 30% grass. This preference has a diurnal pattern, with a stronger preference for clover in the morning, and the proportion of grass increasing towards the evening.[46] When grazing, cattle vary several aspects of their bite, i.e. tongue and jaw movements, depending on characteristics of the plant they are eating. Bite area decreases with the density of the plants but increases with their height. Bite area is determined by the sweep of the tongue; in one study observing 750-kilogram (1,650 lb) steers, bite area reached a maximum of approximately 170 cm2 (30 sq in). Bite depth increases with the height of the plants. By adjusting their behavior, cattle obtain heavier bites in swards that are tall and sparse compared with short, dense swards of equal mass/area.[47] Cattle adjust other aspects of their grazing behavior in relation to the available food; foraging velocity decreases and intake rate increases in areas of abundant palatable forage.[48] Cattle avoid grazing areas contaminated by the faeces of other cattle more strongly than they avoid areas contaminated by sheep,[49] but they do not avoid pasture contaminated by rabbits.[50]

Temperament and emotions

[edit]
Ear postures of cows indicate emotional state and overall welfare.[51]

In cattle, temperament or behavioral disposition can affect productivity, overall health, and reproduction.[52] Five underlying categories of temperament traits have been proposed: shyness–boldness, exploration–avoidance, activity, aggressiveness, and sociability.[53] There are many indicators of emotion in cattle. Holstein–Friesian heifers that had made clear improvements in a learning experiment had higher heart rates, indicating an emotional reaction to their own learning.[54] After separation from their mothers, Holstein calves react, indicating low mood.[55] Similarly, after hot-iron dehorning, calves react to the post-operative pain.[56] The position of the ears has been used as an indicator of emotional state.[28] Cattle can tell when other cattle are stressed by the chemicals in their urine.[42] Cattle are gregarious, and even short-term isolation causes psychological stress. When heifers are isolated, vocalizations, heart rate and plasma cortisol all increase. When visual contact is re-instated, vocalizations rapidly decline; heart rate decreases more rapidly if the returning cattle are familiar to the previously isolated individual.[57] Mirrors have been used to reduce stress in isolated cattle.[58]

Sleep

[edit]
Further information: Sleep in non-human animals

The average sleep time of a domestic cow is about 4 hours a day.[59] Cattle do have a stay apparatus,[60] but do not sleep standing up;[61] they lie down to sleep deeply.[62]

Genetics

[edit]
Further information: Bovine genome
Genomic analysis shows there are five main cattle sub-types, here labelled by continent.[63]

In 2009, the National Institutes of Health and the US Department of Agriculture reported having mapped the bovine genome.[64] Cattle have some 22,000 genes, of which 80% are shared with humans; they have about 1000 genes that they share with dogs and rodents, but not with humans. Using this bovine "HapMap", researchers can track the differences between breeds that affect meat and milk yields.[65] Early research focused on Hereford genetic sequences; a wider study mapped a further 4.2% of the cattle genome.[63]

Behavioral traits of cattle can be as heritable as some production traits, and often, the two can be related.[66] The heritability of temperament (response to isolation during handling) has been calculated as 0.36 and 0.46 for habituation to handling.[67] Rangeland assessments show that the heritability of aggressiveness in cattle is around 0.36.[68]

Quantitative trait loci have been found for a range of production and behavioral characteristics for both dairy and beef cattle.[69]

Evolution

[edit]

Phylogeny

[edit]

Cattle have played a key role in human history, having been domesticated since at least the early Neolithic age. Archaeozoological and genetic data indicate that cattle were first domesticated from wild aurochs (Bos primigenius) approximately 10,500 years ago. There were two major areas of domestication: one in central Anatolia, the Levant, and Western Iran, which gave rise to the taurine line, and a second in the area that is now Pakistan, which produced the indicine line.[70] Modern mitochondrial DNA variation indicates the taurine line may have arisen from as few as 80 aurochs tamed in the upper reaches of Mesopotamia near the villages of Çayönü Tepesi, in what is now southeastern Turkey, and Dja'de el-Mughara, in what is now northern Syria.[71]

Although European cattle are largely descended from the taurine lineage, gene flow from African cattle (partially of indicine origin) contributed substantial genomic components to both southern European cattle breeds and their New World descendants.[70] A study on 134 breeds showed that modern taurine cattle originated from Africa, Asia, North and South America, Australia, and Europe.[72] Some researchers have suggested that African taurine cattle are derived from a third independent domestication from the North African aurochs.[70] Whether there have been two or three domestications, European, African, and Asian cattle share much of their genomes, both through their species ancestry and through repeated migrations of livestock and genetic material between species, as shown in the diagram.[73]

Taxonomy

[edit]
See also: Bos and Bovinae
Cattle phylogeny and migrations involve two major species, at least two domestications, and migrations between these.[73]
Żubroń, a European bison–cattle hybrid

Cattle were originally identified as three separate species: Bos taurus, the European or "taurine" cattle (including similar types from Africa and Asia); Bos indicus, the Indicine or "zebu"; and the extinct Bos primigenius, the aurochs. The aurochs is ancestral to both zebu and taurine cattle.[74] They were later reclassified as one species, Bos taurus, with the aurochs (B. t. primigenius), zebu (B. t. indicus), and taurine (B. t. taurus) cattle as subspecies.[75] However, this taxonomy is contentious, and authorities such as the American Society of Mammalogists treat these taxa as separate species.[76][77]

Complicating the matter is the ability of cattle to interbreed with other closely related species. Hybrid individuals and even breeds exist, not only between taurine cattle and zebu (such as the sanga cattle (Bos taurus africanus x Bos indicus), but also between one or both of these and some other members of the genus Bos – yaks (the dzo or yattle[78]), banteng, and gaur. Hybrids such as the beefalo breed can even occur between taurine cattle and either species of bison, leading some authors to consider the latter part of the genus Bos, as well.[79] The hybrid origin of some types may not be obvious – for example, genetic testing of the Dwarf Lulu breed, the only taurine-type cattle in Nepal, found them to be a mix of taurine cattle, zebu, and yak.[80]

N'dama cattle in a livestock market in Mali

The aurochs originally ranged throughout Europe, North Africa, and much of Asia. In historical times, its range became restricted to Europe, and the last known individual died in Mazovia, Poland, around 1627.[81] Breeders have attempted to recreate a similar appearance to that of the aurochs by crossing traditional types of domesticated cattle, producing the Heck breed.[82]

A group of taurine-type cattle exist in Africa; these represent either an independent domestication event or the result of crossing taurines domesticated elsewhere with local aurochs, but they are genetically distinct;[83] some authors name them as a separate subspecies, Bos taurus africanus.[84] The only pure African taurine breeds remaining are the N'Dama, Kuri and some varieties of the West African Shorthorn.[85]

Feral cattle are those that have been allowed to go wild.[86] Feral populations exist in many parts of the world,[87][88] sometimes on small islands.[89] Some, such as Amsterdam Island cattle,[75] Chillingham cattle,[90] and Aleutian wild cattle, have become sufficiently distinct to be described as breeds.[91]

Husbandry

[edit]

Practices

[edit]
Further information: Animal husbandry
In concentrated animal feeding operations, the cattle are not allowed to wander and graze, as food is brought to them in a feedlot.[92]

Cattle are often raised by allowing herds to graze on the grasses of large tracts of rangeland. Raising cattle extensively in this manner allows the use of land that might be unsuitable for growing crops. The most common interactions with cattle involve daily feeding, cleaning and milking. Many routine husbandry practices involve ear tagging, dehorning, loading, medical operations, artificial insemination, vaccinations and hoof care, as well as training for agricultural shows and preparations. Around the world, Fulani husbandry rests on behavioural techniques, whereas in Europe, cattle are controlled primarily by physical means, such as fences.[93] Breeders use cattle husbandry to reduce tuberculosis susceptibility by selective breeding and maintaining herd health to avoid concurrent disease.[94]

In the United States, many cattle are raised intensively, kept in concentrated animal feeding operations, meaning there are at least 700 mature dairy cows or at least 1000 other cattle stabled or confined in a feedlot for "45 days or more in a 12-month period".[92]

  • A Hereford being inspected for ticks. Cattle are often restrained in cattle crushes when given medical attention.
    A Hereford being inspected for ticks. Cattle are often restrained in cattle crushes when given medical attention.
  • A calf with a nose ring to prevent it from suckling, usually to assist in weaning
    A calf with a nose ring to prevent it from suckling, usually to assist in weaning
  • Cattle feedlot in New Mexico, United States
    Cattle feedlot in New Mexico, United States

Population

[edit]
Cattle headcounts by country, as of 2021

Historically, the cattle population of Britain rose from 9.8 million in 1878 to 11.7 million in 1908, but beef consumption rose much faster. Britain became the "stud farm of the world" exporting livestock to countries where there were no indigenous cattle. In 1929 80% of the meat trade of the world was products of what were originally English breeds. There were nearly 70 million cattle in the US by the early 1930s.[95]

Cattle have the largest biomass of any animal species on Earth, at roughly 400 million tonnes, followed closely by Antarctic krill at 379 million tonnes and humans at 373 million tonnes.[96] In 2023, the countries with the most cattle were India with 307.5 million (32.6% of the total), Brazil with 194.4 million, and China with 101.5 million, out of a total of 942.6 million in the world.[97]

Economy

[edit]

Cattle are kept on farms to produce meat, milk, and leather, and sometimes to pull carts or farm implements.[98]

Meat

[edit]
Further information: Beef cattle and Beef

The meat of adult cattle is known as beef, and that of calves as veal. Other body parts are used as food products, including blood, liver, kidney, heart and oxtail. Approximately 300 million cattle, including dairy animals, are slaughtered each year for food.[99] About a quarter of the world's meat comes from cattle.[100] World cattle meat production in 2021 was 72.3 million tons.[101]

  • The Hereford is a widespread beef breed, introduced in the 18th century
    The Hereford is a widespread beef breed, introduced in the 18th century
  • Australian Droughtmaster cattle on an extensive farm in Queensland, Australia
    Australian Droughtmaster cattle on an extensive farm in Queensland, Australia
  • Aberdeen Angus, a popular small breed, here in Austria with a traditional cattle bell
    Aberdeen Angus, a popular small breed, here in Austria with a traditional cattle bell
  • FAO data for 2021
  • Beef is the third most commonly consumed meat worldwide.
    Beef is the third most commonly consumed meat worldwide.
  • Beef (and buffalo meat) production has grown substantially over the recent 60 years.
    Beef (and buffalo meat) production has grown substantially over the recent 60 years.
  • Production of beef worldwide, by country in 2021.
    Production of beef worldwide, by country in 2021.

Dairy

[edit]
Main articles: Dairy cattle and Dairy product

Certain breeds of cattle, such as the Holstein-Friesian, are used to produce milk,[102][103] much of which is processed into dairy products such as butter, cheese, and yogurt. Dairy cattle are usually kept on specialized dairy farms designed for milk production. Most cows are milked twice per day, with milk processed at a dairy, which may be onsite at the farm or the milk may be shipped to a dairy plant for eventual sale of a dairy product.[104] Lactation is induced in heifers and spayed cows by a combination of physical and psychological stimulation, by drugs, or by a combination of those methods.[105] For mother cows to continue producing milk, they give birth to one calf per year. If the calf is male, it is generally slaughtered at a young age to produce veal.[106] Cows produce milk until three weeks before birth.[103] Over the last fifty years, dairy farming has become more intensive to increase the yield of milk produced by each cow. The Holstein-Friesian is the breed of dairy cow most common in the UK, Europe and the United States. It has been bred selectively to produce the highest yields of milk of any cow. The average in the UK is around 22 litres per day.[102][103]

Dairy is a large industry worldwide. In 2023, the 27 European Union countries produced 143 million tons of cow's milk; the United States 104.1 million tons; and India 99.5 million tons.[107] India further produces 94.4 million tons of buffalo milk,[108] making it (in 2023) the world's largest milk producer; its dairy industry employs some 80 million people.[109]

  • FAO data for 2021
  • World production of bovine milk (cow + buffalo)
    World production of bovine milk (cow + buffalo)

Draft animals

[edit]
Further information: Ox
Oxen used in traditional ploughing – Karnataka

Oxen are cattle trained as draft animals. Oxen can pull heavier loads and for a longer period of time than horses.[110] Oxen are used worldwide, especially in developing countries. There are some 11 million draft oxen in sub-Saharan Africa,[111] while in 1998 India had over 65 million oxen.[112] At the start of the 21st century, about half the world's crop production depended on land preparation by draft animals.[113]

Hides

[edit]

Cattle are not often kept solely for hides, and they are usually a by-product of beef production. Hides are used mainly for leather products such as shoes. In 2012, India was the world's largest producer of cattle hides.[114] Cattle hides account for around 65% of the world's leather production.[115][116]

Health

[edit]

Pests and diseases

[edit]
Further information: Veterinary medicine
Drooling due to foot-and-mouth disease
Infected hoof of the same heifer

Cattle are subject to pests including arthropod parasites such as ticks (which can in turn transmit diseases caused by bacteria and protozoa),[117] and diseases caused by pathogens including bacteria and viruses. Some viral diseases are spread by insects—i.e. bluetongue disease is spread by midges. Psoroptic mange is a disabling skin condition caused by mites. Bovine tuberculosis is caused by a bacterium; it causes disease in humans and in wild animals such as deer and badgers.[118] Foot-and-mouth disease is caused by a virus, affects a range of hoofed livestock and is highly contagious.[119] Bovine spongiform encephalopathy is a neurodegenerative disease spread by a prion, a misfolded brain protein, in contaminated meat.[120] Among the intestinal parasites of cattle are Paramphistomum flukes, affecting the rumen, and hookworms in the small intestine.[121]

Role of climate change

[edit]
Main article: Effects of climate change on livestock
Most of the top 10 beef-producing countries are likely to see lower production with greater temperatures (left) and heat stress (right).[122]

Climate change is expected to exacerbate heat stress in cattle, and for longer periods.[123] Heat-stressed cattle may experience accelerated breakdown of adipose tissue by the liver, causing lipidosis.[124] Cattle eat less when heat stressed, resulting in ruminal acidosis, which can lead to laminitis. Cattle can attempt to deal with higher temperatures by panting more often; this rapidly decreases carbon dioxide concentrations at the price of increasing pH, respiratory alkalosis. To deal with this, cattle are forced to shed bicarbonate through urination, at the expense of rumen buffering. These two pathologies can both cause lameness.[124] Another specific risk is mastitis.[124] This worsens as Calliphora blowflies increase in number with continued warming, spreading mastitis-causing bacteria.[125] Ticks too are likely to increase in temperate zones as the climate warms, increasing the risk of tick-borne diseases.[126] Both beef and milk production are likely to experience declines due to climate change.[122][127]

Impact of cattle husbandry

[edit]

On public health

[edit]

Cattle health is at once a veterinary issue (for animal welfare and productivity), a public health issue (to limit the spread of disease), and a food safety issue (to ensure meat and dairy products are safe to eat). These concerns are reflected in farming regulations.[128] These rules can become political matters, as when it was proposed in the UK in 2011 that milk from tuberculosis-infected cattle should be allowed to enter the food chain.[129] Cattle disease attracted attention in the 1980s and 1990s when bovine spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease) broke out in the United Kingdom. BSE can cross into humans as the deadly variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease; 178 people in the UK had died from it by 2010.[130]

On the environment

[edit]
Main article: Environmental impact of cattle production
Beef has the highest greenhouse gas impact of any agricultural commodity, followed by mutton.

The gut flora of cattle produce methane, a powerful[131] greenhouse gas, as a byproduct of enteric fermentation, with each cow belching out 100kg a year.[132] Additional methane is produced by anaerobic fermentation of stored manure.[133] The FAO estimates that in 2015 around 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions were due to cattle, but this is uncertain.[134] Reducing methane emissions quickly helps limit climate change.[134]

Concentrated animal feeding operations in particular produce substantial amounts of wastewater and manure,[135][136] which can cause environmental harms such as soil erosion, human and animal exposure to toxic chemicals, development of antibiotic resistant bacteria and an increase in E. coli contamination.[137][138]

In many world regions, overgrazing by cattle has reduced biodiversity of the grazed plants and of animals at different trophic levels in the ecosystem.[139] A well documented consequence of overgrazing is woody plant encroachment in rangelands, which significantly reduces the carrying capacity of the land over time.[140]

On animal welfare

[edit]
Further information: Cruelty to animals § Welfare concerns of farm animals
Confining calves for veal production in individual crates has attracted welfare concerns.

Cattle husbandry practices including branding,[141] castration,[142] dehorning,[143] ear tagging,[144] nose ringing,[145] restraint,[146] tail docking,[147] the use of veal crates,[148] and cattle prods[149] have raised welfare concerns.[150]

Stocking density is the number of animals within a specified area. High stocking density can affect cattle health, welfare, productivity,[151] and feeding behaviour.[152] Densely-stocked cattle feed more rapidly and lie down sooner, increasing the risk of teat infection, mastitis, and embryo loss.[153][154] The stress and negative health impacts induced by high stocking density such as in concentrated animal feeding operations or feedlots, auctions, and transport may be detrimental to cattle welfare.[155]

To produce milk, most calves are separated from their mothers soon after birth and fed milk replacement to retain the cows' milk for human consumption.[156]Dairy cattle are frequently artificially inseminated.[157] Animal welfare advocates are critical of this practice, stating that this breaks the natural bond between the mother and her calf.[156] The welfare of veal calves is also a concern.[158]

Two sports involving cattle are thought to be cruel by animal welfare groups: rodeos and bullfighting. Such groups oppose rodeo activities including bull riding, calf roping and steer roping, stating that rodeos are unnecessary and cause stress, injury, and death to the animals.[159] In Spain, the Running of the bulls faces opposition due to the stress and injuries incurred by the bulls during the event.[160]

In culture

[edit]

From early in civilisation, cattle have been used in barter.[161][162] Cattle play a part in several religions. Veneration of the cow is a symbol of Hindu community identity.[163] Slaughter of cows is forbidden by law in several states of the Indian Union.[164]

The ox is one of the 12-year cycle of animals which appear in the Chinese zodiac. The astrological sign Taurus is represented as a bull in the Western zodiac.[165]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cattle

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cattle are large domesticated ruminants belonging to the genus , primarily the taurine (Bos taurus) and zebu (Bos indicus) lineages, which originated from independent domestication events of the wild (Bos primigenius) approximately 10,500 years ago in the Near East for taurine cattle and later in the Indus Valley of the Indian subcontinent for zebu cattle. These animals, characterized by their cloven hooves, horns (in many breeds), and ruminant digestive systems enabling efficient fermentation of fibrous plant material, have been selectively bred over millennia into diverse types adapted to varied climates and production goals, from temperate dairy herds to tropical draft oxen. Primarily raised for beef and dairy production, hides, and historically for traction in plowing and transport, cattle underpin global agriculture by supplying high-quality protein— with beef and milk constituting major dietary staples— and generating substantial economic value through meat exports, dairy processing, and leather industries, while their manure supports soil fertility in integrated farming systems. The global cattle population exceeds one billion head, reflecting their central role in food security and rural economies, though intensive rearing practices have sparked debates over environmental impacts like methane emissions and land use, balanced against empirical evidence of their contributions to poverty alleviation and nutritional outcomes in developing regions.

Taxonomy and Evolution

Etymology and Nomenclature

The word "cattle" entered as catel or cadel around the mid-13th century, derived from Anglo-Norman catel meaning "" or "chattel," which traces back to capitale ("property, principal, chief") from Latin capitalis ("of the head"). This etymology underscores the historical role of as a primary form of movable in medieval , where cattle represented economic value akin to or land, rather than denoting the animals exclusively at first. Over time, the term narrowed in English to refer specifically to bovine , replacing older native terms like cū (cow) or oxa (), which persist in archaic or dialectal use. "Cattle" functions as a collective without a singular form in , encompassing both sexes and all ages of domesticated bovines; the term is never used for a single animal. In broader historical contexts, cognates in (e.g., French cheptel for holdings) retain the property connotation, while derive bovine terms from Proto-Indo-European roots like gʷṓws (yielding English "cow" via cū and "kine" as an archaic ). The shift to animal-specific usage in English likely accelerated with Norman influence post-1066, as Anglo-French legal and economic texts emphasized herds as capital assets. Nomenclature for cattle distinguishes primarily by sex, reproductive status, age, and purpose, reflecting practical classifications in agriculture and husbandry. Adult females that have calved at least once are termed "cows"; pre-calving females are "heifers." Intact adult males are "bulls," while castrated males raised for beef are "steers"; an "ox" typically denotes a mature castrated male (often a steer over four years old) trained for draft work like plowing or hauling. Young cattle under one year are "calves," with sex-specific variants like "bull calf" or "heifer calf."
TermDefinition
CowMature female bovine that has produced at least one calf.
HeiferYoung female bovine that has not yet calved.
BullIntact adult male bovine.
SteerCastrated male bovine, typically raised for .
OxMature castrated male trained for work (often a steer ≥4 years old).
CalfBovine under one year old, regardless of sex.
Scientifically, domestic cattle are classified as Bos taurus (taurine cattle), within the genus , family , order Artiodactyla, class Mammalia; this binomial, formalized by Linnaeus in 1758, distinguishes them from wild ancestors like the (Bos primigenius) and humped indicine cattle (Bos indicus). Regional or breed-specific terms, such as "bullock" (young bull or steer in ), vary but align with these core distinctions.

Phylogenetic Origins

Domestic cattle belong to the genus Bos within the subfamily Bovinae of the family Bovidae, which encompasses ruminant artiodactyls including antelopes, buffaloes, and bison. The Bovinae subfamily shares a common ancestor dating to the Middle Miocene, approximately 15.78 million years ago, as inferred from molecular phylogenies based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Within Bovinae, the tribe Bovini includes the genus Bos, which diverged from lineages leading to bison (Bison) and buffaloes (Bubalus) around 5-10 million years ago, supported by analyses of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers and complete mitochondrial genomes. The direct progenitor of domestic cattle is the extinct aurochs (Bos primigenius), a large wild bovine that inhabited Eurasia, North Africa, and parts of Indian subcontinent from the Pleistocene epoch until its final extinction in 1627 AD in Poland. Phylogenetic reconstructions using ancient DNA from aurochs remains reveal distinct regional populations of B. primigenius, with Eurasian and Near Eastern lineages contributing to taurine cattle (Bos taurus) and Indian subcontinental forms to zebu cattle (Bos indicus). Genetic studies indicate that Bos species, including the aurochs, form a monophyletic clade within Bovini, characterized by adaptations such as horn morphology and body size evident in fossil records from the late Miocene onward. Mitochondrial DNA haplogroup analyses confirm that all modern domestic cattle trace matrilineally to a small founding of approximately 80 wild female domesticated independently in the around 10,500 years ago for taurines and later in the Indus Valley of the Indian subcontinent for zebus. This bottleneck is evidenced by low mtDNA diversity in contemporary breeds compared to wild relatives, with taurine lineages showing T, P, and Q s predominant in European and African cattle, respectively. Ancient genomic data further highlight ongoing from wild into early domestic herds, maintaining traces of ancestral until reduced it.

Domestication Process

Domestic cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus) originated from the wild (Bos primigenius), with domestication occurring independently in two primary events. Taurine cattle (Bos taurus) were domesticated from Eurasian in the during the period, with genetic evidence indicating a founding population as small as 80 individuals approximately 10,500 years ago. Archaeological records from sites in the provide the earliest substantive evidence of cattle management transitioning from hunting to herding, marked by smaller body sizes and altered horn morphologies consistent with for manageability. Indicine cattle (Bos indicus), or , underwent separate from Indian subspecies in the Indus Valley region of the Indian subcontinent around 7,000 to 8,000 years ago, as supported by analyses and archaeological findings of humped cattle remains in early Harappan sites. This process involved initial capture and containment of wild herds, followed by artificial selection favoring traits such as heat tolerance, disease resistance, and draft utility, which differentiated indicine from lineages genetically. Hybridization between and indicine cattle occurred later in the around 4,000 years ago, introducing zebu traits into some African and Asian populations. Genetic studies reveal a domestication bottleneck for cattle, with reduced reflecting intense human-directed breeding pressures that prioritized yield, production, and docility over wild behaviors. The spread of domesticated cattle followed human migrations, with taurine cattle introduced to by Neolithic farmers around 8,500 years ago, evidenced by ancient DNA from Iranian sites showing continuity with modern European breeds. In , taurine lineages arrived via the , while indicine influences came through later admixtures, underscoring the role of in facilitating rapid dispersal and adaptation to diverse environments. These domestication events transformed cattle from large, aggressive wild herbivores into versatile , driven by empirical human needs for reliable protein sources and labor, without reliance on unsubstantiated cultural narratives.

Biology and Physiology

Physical Characteristics

![Charolais bull][float-right] Cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus) are large, quadrupedal ungulates characterized by cloven hooves and a robust body structure adapted for grazing. Their build features a relatively small head, strong , and bulky supported by sturdy limbs, with body size varying significantly by breed and sex. Mature females generally weigh 360–1,100 kg and stand 1.2–1.5 m at the shoulder, while males are larger, often reaching 450–1,800 kg and up to 1.8 m in height for breeds like . Sexual dimorphism is pronounced, with bulls exhibiting thicker necks, broader shoulders, and more muscular frames compared to cows. Horns, when present, emerge from the sides of the head above the ears and curve upward or outward, serving roles in defense and mate selection; however, many modern breeds are polled through . Coat color and pattern diversity includes solid black (e.g., Angus), red (e.g., ), or spotted (e.g., Simmental), with short hair covering a thin, pigmented that varies in attachment and development. Breed-specific traits reflect purpose: display compact, muscular bodies with even fat distribution for meat yield, averaging 1,000–1,300 pounds in breeds like Angus, whereas are leaner and more angular, prioritizing capacity over muscling. The bovine consists of four separate quarters, each with a , suspended in the inguinal region and highly developed in dairy breeds for production. Bos indicus breeds additionally feature dorsal humps, loose skin folds, and longer ears for heat dissipation in tropical climates.

Digestive and Metabolic Systems

Cattle feature a digestive system with a single stomach divided into four compartments: the , , , and . The , the largest compartment, can hold approximately 25 gallons of ingesta and serves as the primary site for microbial fermentation of fibrous plant material. Microorganisms in the break down and other complex carbohydrates into volatile fatty acids (VFAs), primarily , propionate, and butyrate, which provide 70-80% of the animal's energy requirements. The reticulum functions as a sieve, retaining larger feed particles in the rumen while directing smaller ones toward the omasum; it also traps indigestible objects like stones or metal. Attached to the reticulum, the omasum contains numerous leaf-like folds that absorb water, VFAs, and some minerals from the digesta. The abomasum, the "true" stomach, secretes hydrochloric acid and digestive enzymes to further break down proteins and partially digested feed, resembling the stomach of non-ruminants. During rumination, cattle regurgitate partially fermented boluses () from the , re-chew them to increase surface area, and reswallow, enhancing microbial breakdown efficiency. VFAs produced in the are absorbed across the rumen wall into the bloodstream, where supports fat synthesis, propionate contributes to for glucose production, and butyrate provides energy for rumen epithelial cells. This fermentation-based metabolism enables cattle to derive energy from low-quality forages indigestible to monogastrics, though it results in production as a byproduct. In high-producing , metabolic demands elevate VFA needs, influencing feed efficiency and health.

Reproduction and Lifecycle

Cattle reach at varying ages depending on , nutrition, and ; heifers typically attain between 11 and 15 months, while bulls do so around 9 to 12 months. Females exhibit estrus cycles roughly every 21 days outside , facilitating natural mating with bulls. lasts an average of 283 days, ranging from 279 to 287 days by and calf , with conception to birth enabling annual calving in fertile cows. ![Nine sequential photos showing the calf being born](./assets/Cow_giving_birth%252C_in_Laos_stepbystepstep_by_step Parturition occurs in three stages: and (lasting 2-6 hours, often longer in heifers), expulsion of the calf (typically 30-60 minutes for normal with front feet and first), and placental expulsion (3-12 hours post-delivery). Newborn calves, usually singletons (twins occur in 1-3% of cases), stand and nurse within hours to acquire antibodies, with birth weights averaging 30-40 kg for breeds. Complications like dystocia arise from fetal malposition or maternal pelvic inadequacy, increasing mortality risks if unassisted. The bovine lifecycle progresses from neonate (0-3 months: nursing and rapid growth), to juvenile (weaning at 6-8 months, somatic development until puberty), adult (reproductive phase with potential for 8-12 calves over 10-15 years), and senescence (declining fertility post-10 years, natural death around 18-22 years absent production culling). Natural longevity reaches 20-30 years in non-commercial settings, limited by factors like dental wear, metabolic decline, and disease susceptibility rather than inherent senescence. Males (bulls) exhibit similar timelines but shorter effective reproductive spans due to aggression and management.

Sensory and Cognitive Abilities

Cattle possess a wide field of vision spanning approximately 330 degrees, enabling panoramic awareness of their surroundings, which extends to nearly 360 degrees during due to head positioning. This monocular-dominant setup contributes to limited binocular overlap and poor , causing hesitation at shadows, contrasts, or unfamiliar visual cues. Bovines exhibit dichromatic , distinguishing blues and yellows effectively while perceiving reds and greens primarily as or muted tones, with difficulty differentiating from . Auditory capabilities in cattle encompass a broad frequency range from 23 Hz to 35–37 kHz, surpassing limits (typically 20 Hz to 20 kHz) and including heightened sensitivity to high frequencies up to 8,000 Hz. This acuity allows detection of distant calls or mechanical noises that may elicit stress responses, though Bos indicus breeds show greater reactivity to both low and high frequencies compared to Bos taurus. Olfaction serves critical functions in , predator avoidance, mate selection, and social hierarchy maintenance, with cattle detecting odors up to 6 miles away via approximately 1,071 olfactory receptors. Experimental evidence confirms discrimination between complex nonsocial odors, such as and , indicating functional odor categorization beyond mere detection. Taste integrates with smell for feed selection, though empirical data emphasize olfactory primacy in assessment. Cognitively, cattle demonstrate associative learning in maze navigation and tasks, retaining spatial memories for resource locations over extended periods, up to one year in some cases. includes individual recognition of conspecifics via features from varied angles and distances, persisting for months, as well as of familiar versus unfamiliar herd members. Cattle also visually distinguish humans using cues like structure or height, even under consistent clothing, underscoring cross-species recognition capacities. Problem-solving appears limited in novel spatial detours, with evidence against reliance on social learning mechanisms for such tasks, though for learning persists across individuals. These abilities reflect adaptive responses to environmental and social pressures rather than abstract reasoning comparable to .

Behavior and Ecology

Social Dynamics

Cattle form stable, matrilineal herds characterized by linear dominance , primarily among females, which reduce agonistic interactions and determine priority access to resources such as feed and resting sites. These hierarchies are established through agonistic behaviors including butting, pushing, and displacement, with higher-ranking individuals exhibiting fewer defeats and more wins in pairwise encounters. Dominance rank in cows correlates positively with age, body size, parity (number of calves borne), and milk yield, though environmental factors like group stability and resource availability can modulate hierarchy steepness; for instance, increased flattens hierarchies by promoting more frequent rank reversals. Maternal bonds form rapidly post-partum, with cows recognizing and grooming their calves within hours, facilitated by olfactory cues from and vocal exchanges; this bonding supports calf survival through and protection, while separation disrupts both parties' behaviors, elevating levels and vocalizations indicative of stress. Calves reared in cow-calf contact systems display enhanced social , preferring affiliation with conspecifics over isolation and forming stronger bonds with peers, which contrasts with individually housed calves that show reduced sociability. In matriarchal groups, kin clusters persist across generations, with inheriting proximity to their mother's network, fostering herd cohesion. Affiliative behaviors, such as allogrooming—reciprocal licking primarily around the head and neck—reinforce social ties and alleviate tension, with dominant cows initiating more grooming bouts and preferring recipients of similar age or to maintain stability. Allogrooming frequency peaks in stable herds, serving hygienic, physiological (e.g., endorphin release), and relational functions, though its absence in high-density or disrupted groups correlates with elevated . Bulls establish dominance over and among peers via aggressive displays like chin-rubbing, bellowing, and , with rank determined by physical traits (e.g., body mass, horn length) and behavioral factors (e.g., , social ); mature bulls often lead groups or defend harems in extensive systems, while subordination induces in confined settings. In mixed-sex herds, presence intensifies female hierarchies but suppresses overt cow-cow through sexual monopolization.

Foraging and Movement Patterns

Cattle primarily as selective grazers, consuming grasses, forbs, and browse while preferring plant species with higher , such as those rich in protein and digestible , in heterogeneous pastures. This selectivity is evident in their patch residence times and travel speeds, which optimize energy intake by balancing search costs against quality. occurs predominantly during daylight hours, with total daily time typically ranging from 6 to 9 hours, interspersed with rumination periods that can occupy 6 to 8 hours. Grazing patterns exhibit diurnal rhythms, featuring shorter morning bouts, reduced midday activity due to heat avoidance, and peak intensity at to maximize energy accumulation before night. Cattle take approximately 30 to 60 bites per minute, using their tongues to grasp and tear , which influences bite size and rates based on sward and . Environmental factors, including and , modulate these behaviors; for instance, below neutral temperatures, cattle shift toward afternoons while curtailing evening sessions. Movement patterns involve daily horizontal displacements of 1.5 to 4.2 kilometers and vertical shifts of 75 to 174 in varied terrain, driven by needs for , shade, and optimal patches. Free-ranging cattle about 7 to 8 kilometers per day, with supplemented groups showing no significant reduction compared to non-supplemented ones. Longer walks, up to 4 kilometers, correlate with increased duration and decreased rumination time, suggesting adaptive trade-offs in energy expenditure. Individual consistencies, termed "grazing personalities," manifest as varied propensities to traverse hills versus flat areas or to widely versus locally, persisting across contexts and influencing herd-level resource use. These behaviors are heritable to some extent, with patterns transmitted intergenerationally and responsive to landscape heterogeneity and climatic conditions.

Temperament Variations

Cattle temperament, often assessed through measures like exit velocity from handling chutes, agitation scores, and responses, exhibits significant primarily between Bos taurus (European-derived) and Bos indicus (Zebu-influenced) lineages. Bos indicus cattle, adapted to tropical environments with higher predator pressure, display greater reactivity and excitability compared to Bos taurus breeds when subjected to human handling or novel stimuli, as evidenced by higher mean temperament scores (e.g., 3.45 vs. 1.80 on a 1-6 scale where 1 is docile) in Brahman-influenced animals versus non-influenced ones. This difference stems from evolutionary pressures favoring heightened vigilance in Bos indicus, leading to behaviors such as increased balking, vocalization, and struggling during restraint, which can elevate stress hormones like by up to 50% more than in calmer Bos taurus counterparts. Within Bos taurus, breeds like Charolais and show tendencies toward higher activity levels and later maturity, correlating with moderately elevated flightiness, though still less pronounced than in Bos indicus. Sex-based variations further modulate temperament, with bulls exhibiting markedly higher aggression levels than cows or steers across breeds, driven by testosterone influences that amplify charging, butting, and territorial displays, particularly post-puberty around 12-18 months of age. Maternal cows, especially those with calves under 3 months, display protective aggression, charging intruders within a 5-10 meter radius, a behavior observed uniformly but more intensely in flighty breeds. Selective breeding for docility, quantified via chute exit speeds under 1.5 m/s for calm animals, has reduced heritability estimates for excitability from 0.35 in unselected herds to lower values in modern lines, improving handling safety and feed efficiency by 10-15% in docile groups. Controversially, certain breeds like the Spanish Fighting Bull (Toro Bravo) have been intentionally selected over centuries for combative traits, including low fear thresholds and persistent charging, resulting in injury rates to handlers exceeding 20% in traditional events, though this represents an outlier from commercial production goals favoring calm dispositions. Individual and environmental factors interact with genetic baselines; for instance, early at 6-8 weeks can exacerbate excitability in Bos indicus crosses by 20-30% compared to Bos taurus, while consistent low-stress handling from birth mitigates inherited reactivity, as demonstrated in longitudinal studies tracking scores from weaning to slaughter. Overall, calmer temperaments correlate with superior carcass quality, including 5-10% higher marbling scores and lower dark-cutting incidence, underscoring economic incentives for breed substitution or crossbreeding toward Bos taurus dominance in temperate regions.

Rest and Activity Cycles


Cattle exhibit primarily diurnal activity patterns, with the majority of movement and occurring during daylight hours. Nonpregnant, non-lactating individuals display circadian rhythms characterized by peak activity in the light phase of a light-dark cycle. This persists across adults and calves, though individual and seasonal variations influence the degree of daylight preference. Resting behavior in cattle centers on lying down, which occupies 8 to 13 hours per day on average, with most reports indicating 10 to 12 hours. Lying bouts synchronize in peaks during early morning, midday, and late night, decreasing in frequency from suckler cows to those in intensive systems. Rumination, a key resting-associated activity, totals around 7 to 8 hours daily and often coincides with lying periods, facilitating regurgitation and re-chewing of feed. comprises approximately 3 hours of non- and 45 minutes of per day, with EEG patterns during rumination resembling light sleep stages, complicating precise measurement. Activity cycles allocate 90% to 95% of daily time to , ruminating, and resting, with feeding and locomotion peaking in morning and afternoon. In feedlots, social behaviors cluster in these periods, while stereotypic actions remain steady. Circadian disruptions, such as from lameness or estrus, can blunt activity peaks, as observed around 1700 hours. Body temperature rhythms align inversely, minimizing in mornings and maximizing late afternoons, reflecting metabolic integration with behavioral cycles.

Genetics and Breeding

Genetic Structure and Diversity

Domestic cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus) represent two primary genetic lineages derived from the extinct wild (Bos primigenius), with the and subspecies diverging approximately 750,000 years ago based on mitogenome analysis. cattle (B. taurus) were domesticated in the around 10,500 years ago, while (B. indicus) domestication occurred independently in the Indus region of the Indian subcontinent between 7,000 and 9,000 years ago, leading to distinct adaptive traits such as heat tolerance in . These events involved founder effects and bottlenecks that reduced relative to wild populations, though re-evaluations indicate the (Ne) during early was higher than initially estimated, preserving more ancestral variation than a severe bottleneck model predicts. Genetic structure in modern cattle populations is shaped by breed formation, migration, and admixture; genome-wide SNP analyses reveal clustering by ancestry, with European breeds forming distinct groups separate from African or Asian indicus-influenced populations, reflecting historical dispersals and since the . F_ST values between and indicus lineages often exceed 0.2, indicating substantial differentiation, while within breeds, values around 0.05-0.1 highlight moderate structure due to geographic isolation and artificial selection. Admixture is common in tropical regions, where taurine-indicus hybrids show intermediate genetic profiles adapted to local environments, as seen in African . Diversity metrics, such as expected heterozygosity (He), typically range from 0.30 to 0.38 across breeds, with indicus populations often exhibiting higher variability due to broader wild progenitor bases and less intensive modern selection compared to commercial breeds like Holsteins, where has elevated recent homozygosity. Whole-genome studies confirm that while overall diversity (π) in cattle is lower than in wild bovids—estimated at a 5-10 fold reduction from —conserved regions under selection for traits like yield show reduced polymorphism, underscoring the trade-offs of and improvement. Conservation efforts prioritize indigenous breeds with higher unique alleles to counter erosion from and crossbreeding.

Traditional and Modern Breeding Techniques

Traditional cattle breeding centered on selective mating guided by observable phenotypic traits such as body size, milk production, and fertility, with systematic approaches emerging in the mid-18th century through the work of Robert Bakewell in , who applied and progeny testing to improve traits including those in cattle. This method involved choosing superior sires and dams within herds or crossing regional types, as seen in the development of beef breeds like from longhorn and stock in the late , prioritizing meat quality and draft capability. Breed registries, established in the 19th century for types like (founded 1825), formalized pedigree tracking to preserve and enhance breed-specific traits through controlled natural service. Modern techniques expanded genetic dissemination via (AI), first successfully applied to cattle in by starting in 1899 and achieving widespread adoption in the United States during the 1940s, enabling from elite bulls to inseminate thousands of cows annually without bull transport. Frozen , pioneered with the birth of the first North American calf in 1953, further accelerated progress by allowing long-term storage and global exchange of genetics. Complementary reproductive technologies, including introduced in the 1970s and fertilization, multiplied offspring from high-merit females, boosting rates of genetic improvement for traits like growth efficiency and disease resistance. Genomic selection, leveraging DNA marker panels, marked a by predicting breeding values in juvenile animals without waiting for progeny data, with implementation in U.S. dairy cattle evaluations beginning in 2009 and yielding annual net merit gains of $85 per animal post-2010 compared to $40 previously. This approach integrates single nucleotide polymorphism () arrays to select for polygenic traits, reducing generation intervals from years to months and enhancing accuracy over traditional estimated breeding values derived from pedigree and performance records alone. In beef cattle, genomic tools have similarly advanced selection for feed efficiency and carcass quality since the early 2010s, supported by projects like the 1000 Bull Genomes Consortium.

Genetic Engineering Advancements

In 2015, the advent of CRISPR/Cas9 enabled precise in cattle embryos, surpassing earlier methods like TALENs and ZFNs by reducing off-target effects and increasing efficiency for traits such as hornlessness and disease resistance. This technology targets specific loci, such as the POLLED gene, to insert naturally occurring variants without foreign DNA, potentially accelerating breeding by decades compared to selective methods. A landmark application involved editing Holstein cattle for the Celtic polled allele (PC), rendering offspring hornless to mitigate dehorning injuries and stress. In 2019, University of California, Davis researchers produced six hornless calves from edited embryos, with genomic analysis confirming inheritance of the edit in four, alongside unintended but non-harmful integrations resolved in subsequent generations. Similarly, a 2019 genome-edited bull sired hornless progeny, validating germline transmission, though regulatory scrutiny arose over trace bacterial DNA from editing vectors in unrelated trials. These edits address welfare concerns empirically, as horned cattle incur higher injury rates in confined systems, but commercialization faces U.S. FDA classification as bioengineered despite absent transgenes. For disease resistance, TALENs inserted the SP110 gene variant at chromosome 28 in 2014 bovine fibroblasts, yielding cloned cattle resistant to bovine in vitro, with CRISPR/Cas9 later refining similar edits for PRNP to confer and BSE resilience. In 2020, UC Davis edited embryos to disrupt the AMH receptor, producing a calf biased toward male offspring (up to 75% in models), aiming to optimize production amid sex-linked growth disparities. Emerging 2024-2025 efforts target heat tolerance via SLICK gene edits and reduction through rumen microbiome-linked genes, with models projecting 10-20% emission cuts from healthier, resilient herds. Challenges persist due to cattle's long (283 days) and mosaicism in embryos, limiting edit uniformity, alongside ethical debates over unintended ecological impacts despite empirical data from edited lines showing no phenotypic abnormalities beyond targets. Regulatory frameworks, varying by jurisdiction—e.g., permissive in versus stringent in the —hinder adoption, though U.S. approvals for hornless cattle signal progress for verifiable, non-transgenic edits. Ongoing trials, including Cas9-transgenic lines for iterative editing, underscore potential for stacking traits like resistance, but require rigorous off-target validation to ensure causal efficacy.

Husbandry Practices

Management Systems

![Cattle feedlot in New Mexico, United States][float-right] Cattle management systems vary globally based on production objectives, land availability, and economic factors, encompassing extensive , rotational pasture systems, and intensive operations. Extensive systems, common in regions like and parts of , involve low-density on natural rangelands with minimal supplemental feed, supporting cow-calf production where calves are raised to before sale or transfer. These systems leverage large land areas, with global cattle distributions showing concentrations in rangeland-heavy areas as mapped by FAO data from 2020. In contrast, intensive rotational divides pastures into paddocks, rotating herds to allow regrowth, which can increase productivity over continuous by 20-50% through better utilization and . Feedlot systems, prevalent for beef finishing in the , confine cattle at high densities for 90-120 days on high-energy diets to achieve rapid weight gain of 1.5-1.8 kg per day, compared to 0.5-0.8 kg on . In the , approximately 77% of cattle are finished in with capacities exceeding 1,000 head, enabling efficient scaling but requiring substantial inputs like and feed. management often integrates confinement housing with controlled feeding, though -based variants exist; for instance, rotational systems in and optimize yields while reducing feed costs by up to 30%. Comparisons reveal trade-offs: pasture systems enhance aeration and via managed , potentially sequestering carbon, yet demand more per unit output. Feedlots minimize and accelerate production cycles, lowering per-unit costs, but generate concentrated requiring to mitigate runoff. Empirical data indicate feedlot beef may have lower overall per kilogram due to faster growth, though pasture systems score higher on metrics like omega-3 fatty acid content in meat. Adoption of intensive has grown, with USDA reporting increased use in cow-calf operations for improved efficiency since the early 2000s.

Population Dynamics

The global cattle population reached approximately 1.523 billion head in 2020, marking a substantial increase from 942 million in 1961, driven primarily by rising demand for meat and dairy products in developing regions. This growth reflects broader livestock sector dynamics, with intensification in production systems and expanding market chains responding to population increases and income growth in countries like those in Asia and Africa. However, regional variations are pronounced; for instance, the United States reported its smallest cattle inventory in 73 years at 87.2 million head as of January 1, 2024, down 2% from the previous year, due to prolonged droughts and elevated input costs prompting higher culling of breeding females. Major cattle-holding countries dominate the inventory, with Brazil leading at 238.6 million head, followed by India at 194.5 million, the United States at 88.8 million, China at 73.6 million, and Ethiopia at 70.9 million, according to 2025 estimates derived from FAO and national data. India's large population is sustained by cultural and religious prohibitions on slaughter, emphasizing dairy and draft roles over beef production, while Brazil's expansion ties to export-oriented beef industries. In contrast, developed nations like the US exhibit contraction, with the beef cow herd declining 8% from its 2019 peak of 94.7 million head by January 1, 2025, amid profitability pressures and feed scarcity. Key factors influencing population dynamics include reproduction rates, mortality from diseases and predation, and human management practices such as selective breeding and culling. Economic signals, including high beef prices, can encourage herd expansion through heifer retention and reduced culling, though barriers like input costs and climate events often limit rebounds. Environmental stressors, such as droughts, directly reduce carrying capacity and increase offloading, while global demand tied to human population growth—projected to amplify beef consumption—supports long-term increases in developing markets despite per capita variations. Disease outbreaks and policy regulations further modulate growth, with socioeconomic elements like household structure and market access affecting smallholder herd intensities in low-income regions.
Top Countries by Cattle Population (2025 Estimates, in millions)Inventory
Brazil238.6
India194.5
United States88.8
China73.6
Ethiopia70.9

Health Maintenance

Health maintenance in cattle involves systematic preventive measures to minimize disease incidence, optimize productivity, and ensure animal welfare through veterinary oversight, biosecurity protocols, and targeted interventions. Core components include vaccination schedules tailored to regional risks, parasite control programs, nutritional balancing, and routine monitoring, often coordinated via herd health plans developed with licensed veterinarians. These practices reduce mortality rates, which can exceed 2-5% in untreated herds due to infectious diseases, and mitigate economic losses from treatment and reduced gains. Vaccination programs form the foundation of prevention, targeting bacterial and viral pathogens prevalent in and operations. Common regimens include modified-live or killed vaccines against clostridial diseases (e.g., blackleg, malignant edema), complex (IBR, BVD, PI3, BRSV), , and campylobacteriosis, administered to calves at branding (2-4 months) and boosted pre-breeding or . vaccination with RB51 strain is mandatory in endemic areas for heifers aged 4-12 months to curb zoonotic transmission, as enforced by USDA protocols. Efficacy depends on proper timing, storage at 2-8°C, and animal condition; failures often stem from maternal interference in young calves or nutritional deficits impairing . Parasite management addresses internal helminths (e.g., Ostertagia, Cooperia species) and external threats like ticks (Rhipicephalus, ) and flies, which transmit and cause or hide damage. Integrated strategies combine pasture rotation to break life cycles, strategic with anthelmintics like or based on fecal egg counts, and topical acaricides or ear tags for ectoparasites. Selective treatment of high-shedders in cattle preserves against growing resistance, with older animals often requiring less intervention due to acquired immunity. Environmental , such as removing accumulations, further limits reinfestation. Nutritional adequacy supports immune function and prevents metabolic disorders like or . Diets must provide balanced energy, protein, and trace minerals (e.g., , , ) via forages, supplements, or licks, with body condition scoring (1-9 scale) guiding adjustments—targeting 5-6 at calving for cows. Deficiencies, common in selenium-poor soils, exacerbate vaccine underperformance and increase susceptibility to respiratory or neonatal diseases; testing forages and bloodwork informs supplementation. and access are critical, as impairs function and nutrient uptake. Biosecurity and facility management prevent introductions of reportable diseases like bovine tuberculosis or . Protocols mandate quarantining new stock for 30-60 days with testing, vehicle disinfection, and restricted access to limit fomites. Routine practices include trimming to avert lameness (affecting 10-20% of herds annually), clean calving areas to reduce scours in neonates, and prompt treatment of injuries using crushes for restraint. Record-keeping of treatments ensures compliance with withdrawal periods for residues, while genetic selection for disease resistance enhances long-term resilience.

Economic Contributions

Meat Production and Nutritional Value

Beef production involves raising cattle specifically for , utilizing breeds selected for carcass quality, growth rate, and feed efficiency, such as Black Angus, , and Charolais, which dominate commercial operations due to their marbling, tenderness, and yield characteristics. Production systems typically progress through cow-calf operations, where breeding cows produce calves; backgrounding on or ; and finishing in s with grain-based diets to promote rapid and fat deposition. Beef cattle typically reach market weight in 18–24 months, depending on production systems such as grass-fed, feedlot finishing, or a combination thereof. In 2023/2024, global production reached approximately 60 million metric tons, with the and as leading producers, accounting for significant shares due to expansive grazing lands and integrated supply chains. ranks as the third most consumed worldwide, following and , with total production having more than doubled since 1961 amid rising demand in developing economies. Nutritionally, beef is a dense source of high-quality protein, supplying all essential amino acids in bioavailable forms, with a 100-gram serving of cooked lean beef providing about 25-30 grams of protein. It is particularly rich in heme iron, which enhances absorption compared to non-heme sources, zinc for immune function, and vitamin B12, essential for neurological health and often deficient in plant-based diets. A typical 100-gram portion of broiled ground beef (80% lean) delivers around 270 calories, 25 grams of protein, 18 grams of fat (including saturated fats), and significant amounts of niacin, selenium, and phosphorus, supporting muscle maintenance and metabolic processes. Lean cuts, defined by USDA as containing less than 10 grams of total fat per 100 grams, minimize caloric density while retaining micronutrient benefits, countering concerns over saturated fat intake when consumed in balanced diets.
Nutrient (per 100g cooked lean )Amount% Daily Value (approx.)
Protein27g54%
Total Fat10g13%
Iron ()2.6mg14%
6mg55%
2.5µg104%
Data derived from USDA analyses of separable lean from retail cuts, emphasizing 's role in addressing gaps in global diets.

Dairy and Milk Products

Cattle, particularly specialized breeds, supply the majority of the world's used in products. The Holstein-Friesian predominates in commercial operations due to its superior volume, with typical annual yields exceeding 10,000 kilograms per cow in high-input systems. Other key breeds include , valued for higher fat content (around 5%) despite lower volume, and Brown Swiss, noted for protein-rich suitable for cheese production. Yields vary by management, nutrition, and genetics; for instance, elite Holsteins can produce up to 53 liters daily under optimal conditions, though averages in the United States hover around 28-30 liters per day per cow. Global cow's milk production drives the dairy sector, reaching approximately 750-800 million tonnes annually as of 2023, constituting over 80% of total mammalian milk output. In 2024, overall world milk production hit 982 million tonnes, with growth led by and supported by improved and feed efficiency in developed regions. The alone produced 102 million tonnes of cow's milk in recent years, emphasizing industrialized farming with automated . Processing transforms raw into value-added products: fluid (pasteurized and homogenized), cheese (coagulating with , yielding about 1 kg from 10 liters), butter (churning for fat separation), (fermentation with ), and (spray-drying for shelf stability).
Top Cow's Milk Producing Countries (million tonnes, approximate recent data)
United States: 102
India (cow's milk portion): ~100
China: 42
Brazil: 33
Russia: 34
These figures reflect cow-specific output, excluding buffalo milk prevalent in parts of ; India's total milk lead includes significant non-cow contributions. Economically, dairy from cattle underpins a market valued at nearly $992 billion in 2024, with U.S. production alone generating $59 billion in 2022 through farm-gate sales and processing. Value-added items like cheese and command premiums due to longer and concentrated nutrients, amplifying returns; for example, cheese production utilizes excess during high-supply periods to stabilize markets. Innovations in breeding and feed have tripled per-cow yields since the mid-20th century, enhancing efficiency despite debates over input costs and sustainability.

Leather, Draft, and Byproducts

Cattle hides represent the primary for the global industry, with bovine hides accounting for approximately 70% of finished production worldwide. In 2023, global bovine hide production exceeded 6.4 million metric tons, derived from the slaughter of around 270 million cattle annually, of which about 70% of hides are processed into . These hides, typically weighing 25 kilograms each, are tanned through processes involving chemicals like salts to produce durable materials used in , , , and accessories such as belts and wallets. Economically, hides contribute significantly to the industry's revenue, often comprising nearly half of total value and helping to offset production costs by utilizing otherwise discarded material. Cattle, particularly castrated males known as oxen, have served as draft animals for millennia, pulling plows, carts, and other implements in agriculture and transport. Domesticated around 10,000 years ago, they enabled the expansion of arable land by allowing a single team to cultivate up to ten times more area than hand tools alone, contributing to Neolithic agricultural intensification and social stratification in Eurasia. In modern contexts, draft cattle remain prevalent in regions with limited mechanization, such as parts of , , and , where oxen are used for plowing wet fields with less soil compaction than tractors and for carting goods. Globally, draft animals number in the hundreds of millions, with oxen being the most common for plowing tasks, though their use has declined in industrialized nations like the , where they persist on small-scale organic farms for tasks including tillage and manure spreading due to low maintenance costs compared to machinery. Beyond leather and draft roles, cattle yield numerous byproducts from slaughter, enhancing overall economic viability by capturing value from non-carcass components that account for 10-15% of a steer's liveweight value, averaging about $11.77 per hundredweight over recent years. Key byproducts include tallow (rendered fat) for soaps, candles, and biofuels; bones for gelatin, bone meal fertilizers, and surgical implants; blood for plasma proteins and fertilizers; and offal such as organs for pet food, pharmaceuticals (e.g., heparin from lungs, insulin precursors from pancreas), and edible items like tongues and livers. These materials support industries from cosmetics to medicine, with hides alone often representing the largest share of byproduct revenue, underscoring cattle's role in resource-efficient production systems.

Environmental Interactions

Benefits to Ecosystems

Cattle , when managed strategically such as through rotational or holistic planned methods, mimics the ecological role of herbivores like , preventing woody plant encroachment and maintaining open structures essential for native and . In sagebrush ecosystems, targeted reduces fine fuels, thereby lowering probability and severity; a 2024 study in the found that such practices decreased invasive annual grass cover by up to 50% while enhancing native perennial bunchgrasses. Grazing promotes by creating heterogeneous vegetation patches that support diverse , , and small communities; low-intensity mixed with cattle and sheep has been shown to increase taxonomic richness across multiple trophic levels in European grasslands. Cattle selectively consume dominant grasses, suppressing competitive and allowing subordinate to thrive, as evidenced in Hungarian studies where native Grey cattle maintained mosaics conducive to rare orchids and . This dynamic disturbance regime fosters resilience, contrasting with ungrazed areas that succumb to uniform dominance by few or invasives. Nutrient cycling from cattle manure enhances and structure; long-term elevates soil , , and content while improving water infiltration and reducing in forested and soils. In regenerative systems, these inputs, combined with that incorporates into , boost microbial activity and aggregate stability, with seasonal further amplifying biological indicators like abundance. Regenerative grazing practices enable by stimulating root growth and belowground accumulation; field trials report sequestration rates of up to 3.6 tons of carbon per annually in multi-species rotational pastures, offsetting enteric and contributing to net reductions. However, these benefits accrue primarily under that avoids , with gains verified through repeated sampling rather than modeled projections alone. Overall, cattle in well-managed systems provide services including provision and , supporting broader conservation goals in rangelands.

Emissions and Resource Use Debates

, particularly cattle, contribute significantly to global primarily through from in ruminants and from management. According to a 2013 (FAO) assessment, livestock supply chains account for 14.5% of anthropogenic GHG emissions, with cattle responsible for about 62% of that sector's total, equating to roughly 3.8 GtCO2 equivalent annually. More recent FAO estimates have revised this downward to around 12% globally, reflecting refinements in measurement methodologies. These figures, however, remain contested; critics argue that the 100-year (GWP100) metric overstates methane's long-term impact, as it degrades faster than CO2, and alternative metrics like GWP* better capture short-lived pollutants' effects on warming rates. In the U.S., for instance, livestock emissions represent only 4% of total GHGs, dwarfed by transportation and energy sectors. Debates intensify over attribution and comparability, with some analyses suggesting livestock emissions have been exaggerated relative to fossil fuels or in plant-based alternatives, such as synthetic fertilizers for crops. FAO reports, while influential, face accusations of methodological inconsistencies and potential influence from agricultural lobbies, leading to underestimation of reduction benefits in some critiques, though others highlight systemic biases in anti-livestock narratives from environmental groups. Cattle's is further contextualized by their use of marginal lands unsuitable for crops, converting inedible into nutrient-dense food without direct competition with human edibles. Resource demands amplify these discussions: production requires substantial land and , with global (including ) occupying half of habitable land and consuming 70% of freshwater. A pound of demands approximately 1,800 gallons of , predominantly for irrigating feed crops like soy and corn, far exceeding grains or but comparable in efficiency to some when accounting for nutritional density. Land use for can reach 52 times that of eggs or 94 times per kilogram protein equivalent, yet this overlooks cattle's ability to graze non-arable pastures, potentially enhancing and under managed systems. Mitigation strategies, such as regenerative grazing—rotational paddock management mimicking natural herd movements—offer potential offsets by boosting soil carbon sequestration at rates up to 2.29 megagrams per hectare annually in some studies, reducing net emissions through improved microbial activity and buildup. However, scalability remains debated, with evidence mixed on whether such practices achieve atmospheric-level drawdown or merely local soil improvements, and some reviews caution against overhype amid variable outcomes across climates. Intensive systems, conversely, concentrate emissions but enable efficiency gains via feed additives like that cut by up to 80% in trials, highlighting production method's causal role over blanket vilification of cattle. Overall, while cattle husbandry entails verifiable environmental costs, causal assessments emphasize system-specific optimizations over aggregate demonization, prioritizing empirical trade-offs in and land .

Adaptations to Climate Challenges

Cattle face significant physiological challenges from heat stress, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, where temperatures exceeding the thermoneutral zone impair productivity and welfare. Primary responses include elevated respiration rates, increased sweating, and reduced dry matter intake to minimize internal heat production, alongside behavioral shifts such as seeking shade and wallowing in mud to enhance evaporative cooling. These adaptations help dissipate excess heat but can lead to decreased milk yield, fertility, and growth if prolonged. Bos indicus cattle, such as breeds, exhibit superior heat tolerance compared to taurus due to morphological and physiological traits including larger sweat glands, more effective sweating rates, pendulous and loose skin for better heat dissipation, and fat storage in humps that reduces body insulation. In contrast, taurus breeds from temperate origins struggle more with heat, showing higher body temperatures and metabolic stress. Crossbreeds incorporating indicus genetics, like Brahman-influenced composites (e.g., , , Santa Gertrudis), balance heat resilience with productivity, as seen in U.S. and Australian programs selecting for thermotolerance. Indigenous and tropically adapted breeds, including , Tuli, and Mashona, demonstrate resilience to drought through efficient resource utilization, such as lower maintenance feed requirements and ability to thrive on poor-quality . These traits stem from evolutionary pressures in harsh environments, enabling survival during feed shortages without significant productivity collapse, unlike temperate breeds. Genetic selection programs increasingly target these adaptations, using indices for heat tolerance based on traits like thickness and color to mitigate variability impacts.

Societal and Health Impacts

Nutritional and Public Health Roles

Cattle products, particularly and , provide dense sources of bioavailable nutrients essential for . A 100-gram serving of cooked delivers approximately 250 calories, 35 grams of high-quality protein containing all essential , 10 grams of fat (including monounsaturated varieties), and significant amounts of iron, , and . Whole cow , per 100 grams, supplies about 60 calories, 3.2 grams of protein, 3.25 grams of fat, 4.5 grams of carbohydrates primarily as , and key minerals like calcium and , alongside and . These compositions position as a source supporting muscle maintenance and repair, while contributes to through its calcium content, which is more readily absorbed when paired with 's and . Beef and dairy excel in delivering nutrients with superior bioavailability compared to plant-based alternatives. Heme iron in beef, which constitutes 40-55% of its total iron content, exhibits absorption rates of 15-35%, far exceeding the 2-20% for non-heme iron from plants, enhanced further by meat's intrinsic factors that promote uptake. Vitamin B12, absent in plant foods and critical for neurological function and red blood cell formation, is predominantly sourced from animal products; deficiency affects roughly 3.6% of U.S. adults aged 19 and older, rising to 6% or more in those over 60, with vegans at highest risk without supplementation. Dairy reinforces this by providing B12 alongside iodine and other micronutrients often deficient in restricted diets. In global , cattle products play a pivotal role in addressing , supplying 34% of worldwide protein intake and essential s like B12, iron, and that combat stunting and , particularly in the first 1,000 days of life for children in low-income regions. In the U.S., alone meets protein needs for over 43 million people and B12 requirements for 137 million, underscoring its efficiency in nutrient delivery per . These foods support , immune function, and growth, with livestock-derived items proven effective in reducing gaps where sources fall short due to lower absorption. Associations between unprocessed consumption and adverse outcomes like , , or stem largely from observational studies showing weak or inconsistent evidence, often confounded by factors such as overall diet quality, , and physical inactivity rather than causation from itself. Processed meats exhibit stronger links to health risks, but unprocessed beef's profile generally outweighs purported harms in balanced diets, as systematic reviews indicate no robust causal ties when isolating variables. consumption similarly shows neutral or protective effects against certain conditions like , despite saturated fat concerns, with benefits amplified in grass-fed variants offering higher omega-3 levels. strategies emphasizing cattle products thus prioritize empirical contributions over alarmist interpretations of correlative data.

Animal Welfare Considerations

Cattle welfare in intensive production systems, such as s, involves trade-offs between efficiency and indicators of stress, including reduced allowances that degrade and increase or risks, as evidenced by behavioral and physiological measures like elevated levels during heat stress episodes. Pasture-based systems generally yield superior outcomes in reducing lameness, hock lesions, and incidence compared to continuous confinement, though both can expose animals to weather-related stressors like prolonged hunger or cold. Routine management procedures like dehorning and castration elicit measurable pain responses in calves, including vocalizations, elevated heart rates, and cortisol spikes, with additive effects when combined; while local anesthetics and NSAIDs like meloxicam mitigate these, adoption remains inconsistent, with only about 20% of U.S. producers using relief for castration in some surveys. Empirical assessments confirm these interventions reduce behavioral indicators of distress, underscoring the causal link between unmitigated nociception and welfare compromise, though full elimination of such practices would alter production economics without proven net benefits to overall health. In dairy operations, early cow-calf separation, typically within 24 hours of birth, disrupts natural bonding and can induce vocal distress and altered feeding in both, but systematic reviews find no clear detriment to long-term metrics like growth or disease resistance, with some evidence suggesting reduced calf mortality from targeted management. Gradual strategies may lessen acute stress compared to abrupt methods, yet industry practices prioritize yield efficiency, which correlates with lower separation-related pathologies in controlled studies. Transport mortality for cattle averages 0.027% in shipments, lower than for pigs, with injuries linked primarily to and duration exceeding 12 hours, prompting regulations like limits on journey times without rest. U.S. oversight under the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act mandates pre-slaughter , achieving high compliance in inspected facilities per FSIS audits, though non-compliance incidents, such as ineffective captive bolt use, occur at rates below 5% in recent evaluations. Regulatory frameworks differ markedly: EU directives enforce stricter housing densities, disbudding timelines, and welfare (e.g., maximum 8-hour journeys without feed), fostering outcomes like reduced lameness , whereas U.S. standards emphasize outcome-based inspections with voluntary industry codes, reflecting a prioritizing flexibility over prescriptive norms. These variances yield empirical divergences, with European systems showing lower chronic burdens but higher operational costs, highlighting causal tensions between welfare metrics and scalable production.

Cultural and Historical Significance

Cattle were domesticated from the wild aurochs (Bos primigenius) approximately 10,500 years ago in the Near East, marking a pivotal shift in human societies toward sedentary agriculture and pastoralism. Genetic evidence indicates that modern taurine cattle (Bos taurus) descend from a small founding population of fewer than 80 individuals, domesticated in regions like the Fertile Crescent, while indicine cattle (Bos indicus) arose separately around the same period in the Indus Valley of northwest Indian subcontinent. This dual domestication enabled cattle to serve as draft animals for plowing fields, sources of milk and meat, and stores of mobile wealth, facilitating the Neolithic Revolution and the expansion of farming communities across Eurasia and Africa by the 7th millennium BCE. In , cattle held profound religious significance, with the Apis bull revered as a living incarnation of the god from at least the 1st Dynasty (c. 3100–2890 BCE), symbolizing fertility, strength, and regeneration. The Apis cult centered in Memphis involved selecting black bulls with specific markings for ritual veneration, sacrifice upon death, and mummification, underscoring cattle's role in ceremonies linking earthly prosperity to divine favor. Cows, associated with goddesses like and , embodied nurturing and rebirth, influencing beliefs where cattle imagery promised sustenance for the soul. Across Indo-European cultures, cattle symbolized abundance and power, evolving into sacred status in during the (c. – BCE), where cows represented motherhood, earth, and divine provision through figures like , the wish-fulfilling cow. However, archaeological and textual evidence from the Rig Veda (c. 1500 BCE) shows early Vedic people consumed in rituals, with prohibitions on cow slaughter emerging later, likely tied to ecological pressures in agrarian where oxen were essential for tillage and cows for milk production. In Celtic Ireland, cattle signified prestige and economic power, central to epic narratives like the (c. CE transcription of older oral traditions), where raids for superior herds drove intertribal conflicts, reflecting cattle's function as currency in bride-wealth and alliance-building. In sub-Saharan African pastoral societies, such as among the Maasai and Nuer, cattle have historically measured and ties, used in exchanges and as sacrificial offerings to ancestors, with raiding practices—once ritualized tests of manhood—persisting into modern times amid resource scarcity and firearm proliferation. These roles highlight cattle's causal importance in shaping , warfare, and social hierarchies, from expansions to colonial-era displacements where introduced herds altered indigenous economies.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6304694/
  2. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2012/mar/dna-traces-cattle-back-small-herd-domesticated-around-10500-years-ago
  3. https://thoughtco.com/history-of-the-domestication-of-cows-170652
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/bos
  5. https://www.fao.org/livestock-systems/global-distributions/cattle/en/
  6. https://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/17/AB&C_2017_Vol4%284%29_Marino_Allen.pdf
  7. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/sector-at-a-glance
  8. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cattle-livestock-count-heads
  9. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/brief/moving-towards-sustainability-the-livestock-sector-and-the-world-bank
  10. https://www.etymonline.com/word/cattle
  11. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cattle
  12. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cattle
  13. https://livestockconservancy.org/resources/animal-terms/
  14. https://cals.cornell.edu/nys-4-h-animal-science-programs/livestock/beef/beef-cattle-terms
  15. https://elmwoodstockfarm.com/cattle-vocabulary-101/
  16. https://www.gbif.org/species/2441022
  17. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/9913
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790304002647
  19. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-10-177
  20. https://sc.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_2990.html
  21. https://www.nature.com/articles/hdy201679
  22. https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evo-news/no-more-mystery-meat/
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3290115/
  24. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-39518-3
  25. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0209645
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11922504/
  27. https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-the-domestication-of-cows-170652
  28. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/1/1/1127118
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4445560/
  30. https://archaeology.org/issues/july-august-2012/digs-discoveries/the-origins-of-domestic-cattle/
  31. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04737-0
  32. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0509210103
  33. https://www.inaturalist.org/guide_taxa/840616
  34. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Bos_taurus/
  35. https://a-z-animals.com/animals/cow/
  36. https://www.fao.org/4/t0095e/t0095e04.htm
  37. https://dpbck.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Livestock-farming-.pdf
  38. https://josera-agriculture.com/tips-tricks/barn-management/cattle-breeds/
  39. https://tejasranchfence.com/5-most-common-cattle-breeds-texas/
  40. https://www.vetvoice.com.au/articles/difference-between-beef-and-dairy-cattle/
  41. https://uwmril.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/306/2021/08/1_TECH_1_CowIntroUdderAnatomy.pdf
  42. https://extension.umn.edu/dairy-nutrition/ruminant-digestive-system
  43. https://swandairy.com/one-stomach-four-chambers/
  44. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/items/da383a13-d5fc-470f-a43b-77360cf99ea8
  45. https://extension.msstate.edu/publications/understanding-the-ruminant-animal-digestive-system
  46. https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/image_maps/104-ruminant-digestion
  47. https://ansci.wsu.edu/2022/08/02/myth-cattle-have-four-stomachs/
  48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14450002/
  49. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1271599/full
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030281826926
  51. https://epakag.ucdavis.edu/livestock/factsheets/fs-live-AIP03-HeiferManagement.pdf
  52. https://beef-cattle.extension.org/how-long-can-i-keep-a-bull-and-at-what-age-can-a-young-bull-start-mating-cows/
  53. https://beef.unl.edu/faq/pregnant-cows/
  54. https://www.cattlemax.com/articles/understanding-cattle-gestation
  55. https://livestock.extension.wisc.edu/articles/three-stages-of-bovine-parturition/
  56. https://www.iowabeefcenter.org/calving/processdelivery.html
  57. https://www.merckvetmanual.com/management-and-nutrition/management-of-reproduction-cattle/management-of-calving-in-cattle
  58. https://extension.sdstate.edu/calving-dairy-cows-step-step
  59. https://agresearch.okstate.edu/facilities/ferguson-family-dairy-center/kindergarten-second-grade-lesson-plans/life-cycle-of-dairy-cattle.html
  60. https://education.rspca.org.uk/documents/1494931/0/FS%2BCattle%2BFactsheet.pdf
  61. https://sentientmedia.org/how-long-do-cows-live/
  62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18638138/
  63. https://boumatic.com/eu_en/expert-blog/look-through-the-eyes-of-a-cow/
  64. https://www.farmprogress.com/cattle-news/understanding-cattle-vision-and-hearing-can-improve-handling-efficiency
  65. https://www.srpublication.com/experience-cow-vision/
  66. https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302%2801%2974537-7/pdf
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11538434/
  68. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1983-29540-001
  69. https://www.dexterstoday.com/post/understanding-cattle-behavior-hearing-smell-taste-and-touch
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1558787822001216
  71. https://www.facebook.com/groups/DairyFarmingKenya/posts/7757301847666029/
  72. https://www.organicvalley.coop/blog/5-fascinating-things-about-cows/
  73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40250611/
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168159117302290
  75. https://christiannawroth.wordpress.com/2017/10/31/bovine-psychology-cows-experience-rich-emotional-and-cognitive-lives/
  76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320771759_The_Psychology_of_Cows
  77. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21132446/
  78. https://medium.com/the-coffeelicious/what-are-they-really-thinking-219f8b707cd2
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168159101001629
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9490023/
  81. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-63848-1
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6383588/
  83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030222007603
  84. https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302%2822%2900760-3/fulltext
  85. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38825128/
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9863767/
  87. https://onanimals.co.uk/2021/06/04/stress-responses-to-seperation-broken-cow-calf-bond/
  88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125000462
  89. https://www.freenature.nl/en/nieuws/2024/what-does-maternal-herd-cattle-look
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7417353/
  91. https://czaw.org/resources/important-role-of-dominance-in-allogrooming-behaviour-in-beef-cattle/
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168159116301447
  93. https://cosmosmagazine.com/nature/grooming-and-the-social-lives-of-cows/
  94. https://www.msdvetmanual.com/behavior/behavior-of-production-animals/behavior-of-cattle
  95. https://www.beefcentral.com/genetics/traits-that-predict-dominance-in-bulls-keys-to-understanding-herd-hierarchy/
  96. https://www.producer.com/livestock/bunt-actions-establish-herd-hierarchy/
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2684096/
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7693563/
  99. https://www.appliedanimalscience.org/article/S1080-7446%2815%2931095-0/fulltext
  100. https://extension.msstate.edu/publications/beef-cattle-grazing-management
  101. https://psfaculty.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu/gmcourse/text/Chapter3.htm
  102. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16775080/
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016815919090101I
  104. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/10/2903
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124000248
  106. https://clear.ucdavis.edu/news/grass-roots-insight-study-uncovers-patterns-cattle-grazing-behavior
  107. https://www.thecattlesite.com/articles/3211/grazing-behaviour-affects-forage
  108. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4077&context=igc
  109. https://www.grandin.com/references/gains.html
  110. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11405345/
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9512098/
  112. https://www.thecattlesite.com/articles/762/beef-cattle-breeds-and-biological-types
  113. https://www.morningagclips.com/temperament-scoring-cattle/
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4204639/
  115. https://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/how-temperament-affects-performance-quality-beef-cattle
  116. https://beef.unl.edu/chute-scoring-beef-cattle/
  117. https://kb.osu.edu/bitstreams/229dde5b-7ee5-42d3-993b-fbbc52e977ff/download
  118. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-09983-z
  119. https://academic.oup.com/jas/article/100/10/skac233/6623940
  120. https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302%2820%2930885-7/fulltext
  121. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376635716302704
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030219303145
  123. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5898734/
  124. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstreams/a2a6e5fa-1133-4884-a0b8-f266d25190d8/download
  125. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9994596/
  126. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168159121000289
  127. https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/s0022-0302%2817%2930226-6/fulltext
  128. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S187114130900136X
  129. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378111924009776
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6304682/
  131. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-71375-2
  132. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-019-5822-y
  133. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-020-07270-x
  134. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28605-0
  135. https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article/109/2/103/4064635
  136. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-024-09959-9
  137. https://www.ars.usda.gov/plains-area/miles-city-mt/larrl/docs/genetics-history/
  138. https://www.ans.iastate.edu/about/history/people/robert-bakewell
  139. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/6/4/705
  140. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/beef-cattle-farming
  141. https://www.morningagclips.com/the-original-ai-the-development-of-livestock-artificial-insemination/
  142. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030217310366
  143. https://www.absglobal.com/ca/company-2/about/history/
  144. https://www.isaaa.org/blog/entry/default.asp?BlogDate=3/1/2023
  145. https://utbeef.tennessee.edu/beef-cattle-breeding-and-reproduction/
  146. https://usacattlegenetics.com/national-genetic-evaluations/history-of-evaluation/
  147. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.994466/full
  148. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11334705/
  149. https://www.agproud.com/articles/57412-genomic-testing-the-past-present-and-future
  150. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genome-editing/articles/10.3389/fgeed.2023.1272687/full
  151. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-019-0266-0
  152. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-49962130
  153. https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/05/29/they-were-designed-to-be-safer-how-de-horned-cows-were-doomed/
  154. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10828428/
  155. https://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/article/default.asp?ID=18234
  156. https://innovativegenomics.org/news/crispr-in-agriculture-2024/
  157. https://www.thebullvine.com/news/mit-shines-spotlight-on-crispr-a-new-era-for-cattle-genetics-and-climate-change-solutions/
  158. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-11381-8
  159. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294979812500016X
  160. https://vetsci.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4142/jvs.23133
  161. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731121001385
  162. https://extension.umn.edu/pasture-based-dairy/grazing-and-pasture-management-cattle
  163. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6039332/
  164. https://blog.whiteoakpastures.com/blog/cattle-comparison-pasture-raised-grassfed-cattle-vs-feedlot-grain-finished-cattle
  165. https://kb.wisc.edu/dairynutrient/375fsc/48431
  166. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/105077/EIB-243.pdf?v=37283
  167. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10533
  168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2935116/
  169. https://www.fb.org/market-intel/u-s-cattle-inventory-smallest-in-73-years
  170. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/cattle-population-by-country
  171. https://www.nationalbeefwire.com/ranking-of-countries-with-the-most-cattle
  172. https://www.jsmcentral.org/article-info/Factors-Influencing-the-Growth-and-Development-of-Meat-Animals
  173. https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/articles/schulz/SchJun22.html
  174. https://ruminants.ceva.pro/beef-market
  175. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844025001677
  176. https://www.merckvetmanual.com/management-and-nutrition/preventative-health-care-and-husbandry-of-beef-cattle/vaccination-programs-for-beef-cattle
  177. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/cattle/bovine-brucellosis
  178. https://extension.psu.edu/causes-of-vaccine-failure-in-beef-cattle
  179. https://www.merckvetmanual.com/management-and-nutrition/preventative-health-care-and-husbandry-of-beef-cattle/parasite-control-in-beef-cattle
  180. https://www.purinamills.com/cattle-feed/education/detail/a-foundation-for-cattle-health-nutrition-vaccines-and-dewormers
  181. https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/extension/publications/preventive-herd-health-program-checklist-beef-producers
  182. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/cattle
  183. https://www.uaex.uada.edu/farm-ranch/animals-forages/beef-cattle/bqa_field-_guide.pdf
  184. https://sullivan.tennessee.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/196/2020/10/BCP-Chapter-08-Health-Management-of-Beef-Cattle.pdf
  185. https://grillio.com/blog/breeds-of-cattle/
  186. https://newyork.agclassroom.org/empire-agriculture-map/agricultural-products/beef/
  187. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity/0111000
  188. https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production
  189. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/in-depth/cuts-of-beef/art-20043833
  190. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/
  191. https://www.nutritionix.com/i/usda/beef-ground-80-lean-meat-20-fat-patty-cooked-broiled-100-g/ddee7106612289ddc21c13e7
  192. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80400525/data/beef/retail_beef_cuts02.pdf
  193. https://www.americandairy.com/dairy-diary/meet-the-dairy-cows-exploring-the-7-top-dairy-cow-breeds-in-the-u-s/
  194. https://ruminants.ceva.pro/dairy-cow-breeds
  195. https://www.milkingcloud.com/blog/most-preferred-cattle-breeds-milkingcloud/
  196. https://www.fao.org/dairy-production-products/production/milk-production/en
  197. https://www.developmentaid.org/news-stream/post/200444/top-10-countries-by-milk-production
  198. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity/0223000
  199. https://extension.psu.edu/value-added-agriculture-dairy-products/
  200. https://ruminants.ceva.pro/dairy-industry
  201. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=108228
  202. https://www.idfa.org/news/new-report-highlights-dairys-deep-economic-impact-in-communities-across-america
  203. https://www.midwestdairy.com/farm-life/dairy-cows/
  204. https://www.marketreportsworld.com/market-reports/bovine-leather-goods-market-14718862
  205. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43621-025-00798-6
  206. https://s.chooserealleather.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Sustainability-Factsheets-Facts-and-figures.pdf
  207. https://lussoleather.com/blogs/guide/what-is-cowhide-leather
  208. https://www.ag.ndsu.edu:444/news/columns/spotlight-on-economics/spotlight-on-economics-byproduct-exports-important-to-cattle-prices
  209. https://auri.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/AURI-Brief3-SustainableUses_2.0_revise.pdf
  210. https://agupdate.com/theprairiestar/opinion/columnists/farm_and_ranch_life/cattle-s-importance-to-humans-throughout-history/article_faa71af7-fbad-54a5-aabd-4378e806cfca.html
  211. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2019-09-18-roots-inequality-traced-back-neolithic-ox-drawn-plows
  212. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8471664/
  213. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016788090300118X
  214. https://smallfarms.cornell.edu/2012/06/working-oxen-on-the-farm-today/
  215. https://attra.ncat.org/publication/draft-animal-power-for-farming/
  216. https://www.drovers.com/news/beef-production/understanding-beef-product-values
  217. https://www.extension.iastate.edu/allamakee/files/documents/Lesson1Activity4Dairy_By_Products.pdf
  218. https://calfnews.net/industry-issues/beef-byproducts-more-than-drop/
  219. https://www.thebeefsite.com/articles/3044/wheres-the-not-meat-byproducts-from-beef-and-pork
  220. https://www.audubon.org/magazine/how-cattle-ranchers-are-helping-save-western-grasslands-and-birds
  221. https://pubs.nmsu.edu/_circulars/CR686/
  222. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4859
  223. https://www.ars.usda.gov/news-events/news/research-news/2024/ars-scientists-discover-strategically-applied-livestock-grazing-can-benefit-sagebrush-communities/
  224. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9763128/
  225. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479723005571
  226. https://www.ebparks.org/natural-resources/grazing/benefits
  227. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8969921/
  228. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2020.534187/full
  229. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167880925003949
  230. https://forceofnature.com/blogs/regenerate/carbon-sequestration
  231. https://stories.tamu.edu/news/2021/08/10/grazing-cattle-can-reduce-agricultures-carbon-footprint/
  232. https://civileats.com/2021/01/06/a-new-study-on-regenerative-grazing-complicates-climate-optimism/
  233. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7435039/
  234. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019005282100119X
  235. https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1634679/
  236. https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/new-fao-report-maps-pathways-towards-lower-livestock-emissions/en
  237. https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/food-agriculture-environment/livestock-dont-contribute-14-5-of-global-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  238. https://clear.ucdavis.edu/news/climate-impacts-methane-are-overstated-according-review-new-research
  239. https://news.unl.edu/article/cattle-emissions-expert-environmental-impact-of-beef-has-been-overstated
  240. https://www.ilri.org/news/belching-bovines-and-global-warming-overstated-claims-about-methane-emitted-cows-and-climate
  241. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/apr/19/un-livestock-emissions-report-seriously-distorted-our-work-say-experts
  242. https://www.climatechangenews.com/2024/08/14/fao-draft-report-backs-growth-of-livestock-industry-despite-emissions/
  243. https://clear.ucdavis.edu/explainers/cattle-and-land-use-differences-between-arable-land-and-marginal-land-and-how-cattle-use
  244. https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food
  245. https://foodprint.org/issues/the-water-footprint-of-food/
  246. https://greenstarsproject.org/2025/01/19/the-environmental-footprints-of-meat-and-other-foods/
  247. https://drawdown.org/insights/regenerative-grazing-is-overhyped-as-a-climate-solution-we-should-do-it-anyway
  248. https://time.com/6835547/regenerative-cattle-farming/
  249. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306456523002814
  250. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668733/
  251. https://nwdistrict.ifas.ufl.edu/phag/2025/03/14/heat-stress-and-its-impact-on-cattle-reproduction/
  252. https://academic.oup.com/af/article/15/3/38/8223531
  253. https://agnext.colostate.edu/2024/11/05/bos-indicus-adaptions-for-heat-tolerance/
  254. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141321000652
  255. https://www.agproud.com/articles/57803-development-of-heat-tolerant-breeds-in-the-us
  256. https://www.neogen.com/en/usac/neocenter/blog/the-heat-resistant-cow-of-the-future/
  257. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09712119.2025.2568562
  258. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7023624/
  259. https://www.farmprogress.com/livestock/beef-producers-breeding-for-heat-tolerance
  260. https://cabcattle.com/wp-content/uploads/HeatToleranceCattle.pdf
  261. https://www.beefresearch.ca/topics/nutritional-qualities-of-beef/
  262. https://foods.fatsecret.com/calories-nutrition/generic/milk-cows-fluid-whole?portionid=49474&portionamount=100.000
  263. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/milk
  264. https://milk.co.uk/nutritional-composition-of-dairy/milk/
  265. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/animal-science/articles/10.3389/fanim.2023.1142252/full
  266. https://nutritionfacts.org/blog/plant-versus-animal-iron/
  267. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminB12-HealthProfessional/
  268. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/vitamin-b12-foods
  269. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/15b2eb21-16e5-49fa-ad79-9bcf0ecce88b/content
  270. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6951902/
  271. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6736101/
  272. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6434678/
  273. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9556326/
  274. https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/whats-the-beef-with-red-meat
  275. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37264855/
  276. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M19-0655
  277. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/heart-disease/expert-answers/grass-fed-beef/faq-20058059
  278. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731120001652
  279. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1513368/full
  280. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7222824/
  281. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731116001336
  282. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11385012/
  283. https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/resources/dehorning_cattle_bgnd.pdf
  284. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9929155/
  285. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/animal-welfare/article/efficacy-of-pain-management-for-cattle-castration-a-systematic-review-and-metaanalysis/4D9C403E2865D4048FCCEB18F07F714E
  286. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7094284/
  287. https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302%2823%2900640-9/fulltext
  288. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159122000508
  289. https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302%2823%2900741-5/fulltext
  290. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1828051X.2022.2038038
  291. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6162402/
  292. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-9/chapter-III/subchapter-A/part-313
  293. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7134563/
  294. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731123003269
  295. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9518
  296. https://www.dairyglobal.net/health-and-nutrition/health/comparing-dairy-cow-welfare-standards-across-europe/
  297. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Apis-Egyptian-deity
  298. https://egypt-museum.com/cows-bulls-in-ancient-egypt/
  299. https://hekint.org/2025/05/29/the-cow-in-culture-and-history/
  300. https://www.britannica.com/topic/sanctity-of-the-cow
  301. https://theconversation.com/hinduism-and-its-complicated-history-with-cows-and-people-who-eat-them-80586
  302. https://people.uncw.edu/ricej/intro/indiasacredcow.pdf
  303. https://www.enjoy-irish-culture.com/ancient-ireland-celts-and-cattle.html
  304. http://journals.laikipia.ac.ke/index.php/jsseh/article/view/28/32
  305. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/cattle-rustling-from-cultural-practice-to-deadly-organised-crime
  306. https://www.choice360.org/choice-pick/cattle-in-history-culture-and-thought-part-1-october-2025/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.