Hubbry Logo
Buy Nothing ProjectBuy Nothing ProjectMain
Open search
Buy Nothing Project
Community hub
Buy Nothing Project
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Buy Nothing Project
Buy Nothing Project
Buy Nothing Project
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Buy Nothing Project is a global conglomeration of community-based groups, founded in Bainbridge Island, Washington, in 2013, that encourages giving (or recycling) of consumer goods and services (called "gifts of self"[2]) in preference to conventional commerce.

Key Information

The stated aim of the Buy Nothing Project is "to build resilient communities where our true wealth is the connections forged between neighbors".[1] It began as a Facebook campaign, (now existing both on Facebook and as a standalone, separate app) and has built up local groups in the US and other countries, claiming over 4,000 volunteers and 7.5 million community members.[1][3]

Controversy

[edit]

The Buy Nothing Project began enforcing its trademark in late 2025, leading to the shutdown of many independent Facebook gifting groups that used the term "Buy Nothing".[4] The organization stated it was protecting its intellectual property, though the move comes after its app with a paid option, which was launched in 2022.[4] Consequently, many affected groups changed their names to continue operating independently.[4] Some groups were able to get reinstated by Facebook under a new name.[5]

Global and local impact

[edit]

On a local level, each Buy Nothing Project group can sometimes contribute to local waste prevention and waste reduction efforts by reducing the need for people to buy new goods,[6][7][8] but the actual impact of local Buy Nothing Project groups has not been measured or surveyed.

The project website notes that because the map of groups was based on existing neighborhood boundaries, and those boundaries have been influenced by socioeconomic differences and practices such as redlining, the map "began to align with unjust boundaries, including historic redlining, and this alignment amplified these injustices".[9] In the summer of 2020, the project went through an "equity overhaul" to diversify the local groups. The leader of one in Minneapolis, Minnesota said, "It's been hard to diversify our groups, because our groups reflect our neighborhoods and our neighborhoods are largely segregated in Minneapolis".[10]

Globally, the Buy Nothing Project has been featured by print/online media in USA (see references), UK, Asia and Australia, as well as video media such as this report by CBS Mornings: CBS: "Buy Nothing Project" groups offering more than just gifts. With the advent of the Buy Nothing mobile app, membership is possible wherever one is situated in the world and geographic boundaries no longer matter for travellers who want to participate outside of the area where they reside.

Organization and goals

[edit]

The Buy Nothing Project encourages local communities to focus on improving the community in which they live[11] and keep groups small and local to minimize distance traveled to pick up items.[12] There is no overt criticism of consumerism, but the project's goals include saving money and reducing waste.[13] The projects' co-founders, Rebecca Rockefeller and Liesl Clark, say that it is not just recycling; it is a way to fuel the gift economy and build community.[1]

Members are expected to follow the rules and mission statement of the project,[14] although in the traditional iteration, via Facebook groups the group leaders or moderators may choose to tailor the rules to better suit their local community of the type of project they wish to coordinate.[9]

Membership is restricted to persons of legal age as prescribed by the laws of each group's geographic location.[9]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Buy Nothing Project

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Buy Nothing Project is a worldwide network of hyperlocal gift economies founded in 2013 by Liesl Clark and Rebecca Rockefeller on , where participants give, request, lend, and share items and services without monetary transactions, emphasizing gratitude and community building over consumption. Inspired by concerns over and waste, the initiative began as a single group aimed at encouraging local sharing to reduce buying and foster neighborly ties. The project expanded rapidly through volunteer-led groups, reaching over 7.5 million members across more than 128,000 communities by 2024, while also publishing a book, The Buy Nothing, Get Everything Plan, to promote its principles of gifting and . In 2021, the founders incorporated as a and launched a dedicated app to decentralize from and sustain operations through donations, though the app faced technical issues and lower adoption compared to the groups. A major emerged in 2022 when volunteer administrators criticized the centralization, enforcement, and perceived commercialization, leading to the departure of numerous groups that rebranded under alternatives like "Gifting with Integrity" to preserve the original decentralized . Founders defended the changes as necessary for and independence from platforms, but the conflict highlighted tensions between volunteerism and structured in scaling community-driven initiatives. Despite the split, independent groups continued to thrive, underscoring the project's enduring appeal in promoting free exchange amid critiques of administrative hierarchies and equity challenges in group rules.

History

Founding and Initial Experiment (2013)

Liesl and Rebecca , both environmental advocates with backgrounds in waste reduction and community initiatives, co-founded the Buy Nothing Project by launching its inaugural hyper-local group in July 2013 on . The initiative originated as a to promote a through the free exchange of unused items, drawing from the founders' personal frustrations with household clutter and excess possessions accumulated via . , a documentary filmmaker focused on , and , who had experience in , sought to address local waste streams by encouraging residents to repurpose rather than discard goods. The project's core objectives centered on minimizing household waste destined for landfills, strengthening interpersonal connections among neighbors, and countering materialistic consumption patterns by facilitating no-cost gifting of tangible items and services. Inspired by indigenous gifting traditions and the founders' observations of isolated modern lifestyles, the experiment emphasized building trust through direct, face-to-face interactions post-Facebook coordination, such as porch pickups or handoffs. From inception, participants shared household goods like clothing, tools, and furniture, as well as intangible offerings such as advice or labor, with givers retaining full discretion over recipients to prioritize relational dynamics over transactional efficiency. Early adoption was organic, driven by word-of-mouth within the island's approximately 24,000 residents, without formal promotion or external . The group quickly established foundational rules—"no buy, no sell, no solicit"—to enforce a pure model, prohibiting monetary exchanges, wanted ads, or sales inquiries, which helped sustain focus on abundance through sharing rather than scarcity-driven acquisition. This structure fostered initial participation metrics untracked formally but evidenced by sustained posts of diverse items, demonstrating viability as a localized anti-waste mechanism before any scalability efforts.

Growth via Social Media (2014–2020)

Following the initial experiment on Bainbridge Island, the Buy Nothing Project proliferated through Facebook groups, enabling participants to form neighborhood-based networks for gifting physical items without monetary exchange. By 2016, the initiative had expanded to 30 such groups, primarily in the United States. This growth accelerated as volunteer administrators adopted standardized guidelines emphasizing locality—typically within walking or biking distance—to foster interpersonal trust and accountability, distinguishing the project from broader online marketplaces. The network reached 1,000 groups by 2018, incorporating the project as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit in to support administrative training and resource sharing among leaders. Guidelines evolved during this period to explicitly encourage intangible offerings, such as skills, time, or emotional support alongside physical goods, allowing members to request favors like recipe advice or companionship walks while upholding the no-strings-attached ethos. This adaptation aimed to deepen community bonds in expanding groups, which were capped at around 800–1,000 members before splitting into smaller, adjacent locales to maintain manageability and prevent dilution of personal connections. The catalyzed a surge in engagement by , with groups reaching over 6,000 worldwide and surpassing 3 million members, as isolation and supply disruptions prompted increased requests for essentials like , , and household supplies. Participants reported heightened gifting activity linked to economic uncertainty and social disconnection, with local exchanges providing both material aid and psychological relief through neighborly interactions otherwise curtailed by lockdowns. Strict locality rules proved resilient, enabling verifiable in-person handoffs that built on pre-existing trust rather than relying on distant shipping networks strained by global events.

Attempts at Independence and Internal Fractures (2021–present)

In response to growing concerns over the Buy Nothing Project's heavy dependence on —which hosted over 6,000 local groups but imposed algorithmic changes, moderation challenges, and potential policy shifts that threatened scalability—the founders Liesl Clark and Rebecca Rockefeller initiated efforts in 2021 to develop an independent . The app aimed to enable hyper-local gifting without platform intermediaries, supporting global expansion through proprietary technology. To fund development, the founders secured investments, including $100,000 from Paul English, co-founder of , who also connected them to additional sources for hiring developers and building infrastructure. A beta version of the Buy Nothing app launched in November 2021, initially presented as a complementary tool to groups rather than a replacement. However, by early , the founders intensified promotion of the app as the project's future, citing 's unreliability and the need for data control to sustain the gift economy model. This shift sparked initial resistance from volunteer administrators, who viewed the app as undermining the decentralized, community-driven ethos rooted in 's neighborhood-specific groups. Tensions escalated in 2023 following the app's fuller rollout and the founders' attempts to enforce on "Buy Nothing," requiring groups to migrate or rebrand under official guidelines. backlash manifested in widespread admin revolts, with many moderators decrying the perceived centralization and risks introduced by and app features, such as optional premium subscriptions. In response, dissident administrators formed alternatives like "Gifting with Integrity" groups, which prioritized the original non-proprietary, Facebook-based model and attracted admins seeking to preserve autonomy without app integration. These fractures led to group schisms, with some local splitting or renaming to evade claims, fracturing the network's cohesion. As of 2024–2025, the Buy Nothing app continues to operate, offering features like geofenced local feeds and gifting requests, but it has encountered persistent usability issues, including less intuitive hyper-local matching compared to and slower adoption rates. Many communities have partially reverted to or maintained standalone groups, often under rebranded names like "Community Gifting," contributing to stalled overall growth and fragmented user bases. Retention challenges persist, with reports indicating lower engagement on the app due to its broader scope diluting neighborhood focus, prompting ongoing debates over whether full independence from remains viable without alienating core volunteers.

Principles and Operations

Core Philosophy and Gift Economy Model

The Buy Nothing Project espouses a model predicated on the free circulation of , services, and expressions of gratitude among hyper-local communities, eschewing monetary transactions to prioritize human connections over material exchange. Participants are encouraged to operate from an abundance mindset, trusting that shared resources suffice for collective needs rather than under a , which underpins behaviors. This approach views all gifts as equivalent in value, with the relational bonds formed—rather than the items themselves—constituting the core wealth generated. Central to the is generalized reciprocity, wherein giving prompts no direct for repayment but fosters ongoing cycles of mutual support and appreciation, subverting binary distinctions between providers and recipients. Every individual embodies both roles, enabling a fluid dynamic that builds trust and resilience through voluntary without limits on frequency or volume. The model draws on the innate inclination toward care and , positing that local gifting networks can sustain participants amid broader systemic constraints by emphasizing personal agency in redistributing surplus possessions. By advocating decluttering and resource circulation as acts of individual responsibility, the project implicitly critiques unchecked accumulation while avoiding prescriptive ideologies, instead promoting a pragmatic shift toward viewing possessions as communal assets that, when gifted freely, diminish through and reinforce social fabric.

Group Guidelines and Practices

Buy Nothing groups enforce strict protocols limiting posts to three categories: offers to give items or services freely, requests for specific needs, and expressions of for past exchanges. These rules mandate hyper-local participation, typically within a 20-mile radius or neighborhood boundaries, to foster direct neighbor-to-neighbor interactions and exclude non-local requests that could dilute ties. Prohibitions against sales, trades, bartering, or any form of compensation ensure the system remains a pure exchange, preventing of goods. Daily gifting rituals involve posting offers or asks with photographs to enhance transparency and verify item condition, reducing potential for scams through visual evidence and full disclosure. A typical "GIVE" or gift post might read: "Offered: One gently used bicycle. It’s in good working condition but could use a tune-up. Please let me know if you can pick it up this weekend. I’ll choose a recipient by Friday at 6 pm." Such posts commonly include clear descriptions of the item, its condition, pickup details, and a selection timeline, with givers choosing recipients based on responses—such as by need or randomly—rather than selling. Recipients express interest via comments, followed by private coordination for pickup marked as "pending" then "gifted" upon completion. Common items exchanged include furniture, clothing, kitchen tools, books, toys, food staples, and sporting equipment, with participants encouraged to "" by passing received gifts onward when no longer needed. To accommodate diverse community needs, groups permit creative asks for services, time, or assistance alongside tangible goods, while rules against —such as limiting excessive requests—and reselling gifted items outside the network promote equitable circulation and trust-building. Participants use real-name profiles and community reporting to maintain accountability, adapting protocols locally to balance inclusivity with enforcement of no-profit motives.

Role of Moderators and Community Governance

Local volunteer administrators, often referred to as admins, manage individual Buy Nothing groups by approving membership applications through queues, enforcing the project's core rules such as geographic boundaries and no-transaction policies, and facilitating among members. These admins operate as community leaders, nurturing through direct member interactions, including private messaging for suggestions and encouraging in-person discussions for disputes, while adapting global standards to local contexts. The structure emphasizes member-driven input, with admins accountable primarily to their groups rather than a central . Governance in the Buy Nothing Project embodies ideals of , with each private group run independently by its local admin team under a licensing agreement that grants use of the project's name and materials in exchange for upholding shared values like and local gifting. Founders Liesl Clark and Rebecca Rockefeller initially provided templates, training resources, and oversight through informal hubs without direct operational control, preserving bottom-up where local teams tailor norms and resolve issues autonomously. This model aligns with the project's philosophy, prioritizing volunteer-led empowerment over hierarchical mandates, though admins hold inherent power in moderating content and memberships. Practical challenges arise from this volunteer reliance, including administrative strain where admins report dedicating 7 to 40 hours weekly, contributing to burnout and high turnover in larger groups that overwhelm small teams. Inconsistent enforcement occurs due to local variations in rule application, as admins adapt standards differently, leading to differences in how boundaries, gratitude posts, or disputes are handled across communities. Official guidance acknowledges that expansive groups strain volunteer capacity, underscoring limits to without additional support. The 2021 launch of the Buy Nothing app marked a shift toward greater founder oversight, with the formation of The Buy Nothing Project Inc. introducing formalized tiers of regional and global admins to standardize operations and address Facebook dependencies, retaining ultimate decision-making at the top. This centralization effort, aimed at enhancing tools for admins like metrics and events, heightened tensions over power dynamics, as local volunteers perceived it as eroding the decentralized, ethos in favor of top-down directives on rules and boundaries. Despite providing resources to mitigate admin burdens, the transition amplified debates on balancing global consistency with local .

Technological Evolution

Reliance on Facebook Groups

The Buy Nothing Project scaled rapidly through private groups, which facilitated hyper-local organization by restricting membership to specific neighborhoods or boundaries, enabling targeted sharing within small communities. 's algorithms promoted group visibility to users in the same geographic areas, driving organic viral growth via member invitations and recommendations, with the network expanding to over 6,500 groups worldwide by 2021. This structure supported the project's emphasis on proximity-based gifting, as groups typically "sprouted" new ones upon reaching 800–1,000 members to maintain manageability. Key technical affordances included straightforward tools, such as admin controls for approving members, removing posts, and enforcing guidelines, which volunteer moderators used to sustain community norms without . Visual posting features allowed easy uploads of photographs for items, enhancing in a platform optimized for image-based interactions. Notifications for new posts, comments, and requests fostered real-time , as members received alerts that encouraged prompt responses and discussions, strengthening local ties through iterative exchanges. However, reliance on Facebook introduced limitations, including data privacy risks from the platform's collection of user information, which founders cited as a for seeking , given the visibility of names and photos in groups. Algorithmic changes and policy shifts, such as adjustments to organic reach and group recommendation priorities, periodically reduced post visibility and complicated outreach to potential members. These factors, combined with the platform's for-profit model, underscored vulnerabilities in scaling beyond Facebook's .

Development and Launch of the Buy Nothing App

The Buy Nothing Project initiated development of a mobile application in early 2021 to reduce dependence on 's platform, registering as a on January 13, 2021. This shift aimed to create a dedicated space for hyper-local gifting, featuring geofenced communities where users could set an address and search within a specified radius, such as 1 to 20 miles, without requiring administrator approvals for posts. The app launched in November 2021, marking a technical departure from groups by enabling direct give-and-take interactions tailored to the project's model. Despite initial downloads reaching 600,000 by its one-year anniversary and attracting 91,000 regular users, the launch encountered significant technical hurdles, including bugs that prevented basic functions like photo posting and user registration. These issues contributed to low adoption rates, with monthly dropping to 75,000 by April 2022, prompting many participants to revert to groups for reliability. The app's rudimentary interface and lack of social connectivity features, such as visible friend networks, further exacerbated user dissatisfaction and stalled growth amid community resistance to the perceived commercialization of the movement. Subsequent updates addressed some deficiencies, including major bug fixes in April 2022 for account activation and login problems, and further improvements in August 2025 that resolved persistent login issues, streamlined sign-up flows, and corrected display errors. However, challenges persisted, as the platform struggled to accommodate broader user bases beyond its core of approximately 1.4 million off- participants by early 2025, limiting its ability to fully supplant amid ongoing technical limitations and funding constraints from unsuccessful pitches.

Measured Impacts

Environmental and Economic Data

A 2020 survey conducted by the Buy Nothing Project found that 90% of respondents reported saving at least some each month through participation, primarily by acquiring needed items via gifting rather than purchase. This self-reported reflects individual cost avoidance on consumer goods, though it does not quantify average savings amounts or account for potential opportunity costs such as time spent searching for gifts. Redirected spending from avoided purchases may indirectly support local businesses, such as through services or non-gifted items, but no empirical studies confirm net economic stimulus at the community level. On environmental metrics, a 2023 pilot study of two Buy Nothing groups in , , analyzed 219 gift posts over four weeks and found that 77% of recirculated items would otherwise have entered landfills (red bin waste), 17% streams, and 6% organic waste. Interviewees reported personal waste reductions, such as limiting household rubbish to one bag weekly, attributed to practices. However, independent remains scarce; the project's scale—7.5 million members across 128,000 groups as of 2025—facilitates localized diversion of surplus goods but operates on a fraction of global consumption volumes, with annual exceeding 2 billion tons worldwide. From a causal perspective, gifting primarily reallocates existing material stocks among participants, averting discard of usable items without addressing upstream production or incentivizing reduced ; inefficiencies in matching donors and recipients via non-price mechanisms may further limit net optimization compared to secondary markets. Limited peer-reviewed quantification underscores reliance on anecdotal and small-sample evidence for broader claims of .

Social and Community Effects

The Buy Nothing Project has facilitated interpersonal connections among neighbors by enabling hyperlocal exchanges that foster mutual aid and reciprocity. Participants report strengthened community ties through gifting items, skills, and services, which encourages face-to-face interactions and reduces social isolation in suburban and urban settings. During the COVID-19 pandemic, group activity surged as members shared essential goods like masks, groceries, and childcare support, enhancing resilience in isolated households and promoting a sense of collective care amid lockdowns. Anecdotal evidence from participants highlights skill-sharing, such as teaching repairs or gardening, which builds practical interdependence and counters modern atomization by leveraging local human capital. Participation exhibits pronounced gender dynamics, with women comprising the majority of members and administrators. Founder Rebecca Rockefeller noted in 2023 that women vastly outnumber men in both giving and moderating roles, aligning with patterns where females predominate in community resource management. Internal data indicates approximately 95% of volunteers are women, a trend founders attribute to women's traditional oversight of household goods and social networks, potentially reinforcing gendered divisions of unpaid labor in domestic spheres. Scalability challenges arise from the project's emphasis on small, groups, as larger memberships dilute interpersonal trust essential for anonymous gifting. Guidelines recommend "sprouting" groups—splitting oversized ones into subgroups once they exceed optimal sizes—to preserve familiarity and , preventing erosion of the intimate reciprocity that underpins the model. In practice, expanded groups risk anonymous exploitation or interpersonal conflicts, limiting broader societal penetration without compromising the relational depth that drives cohesion.

Criticisms and Controversies

Internal Organizational Conflicts

In early 2023, tensions escalated within the Buy Nothing Project when co-founders Liesl Clark and Rebecca Rockefeller announced plans to develop a app and formalized the organization as The Buy Nothing Project Inc., a public benefit corporation, to transition away from reliance on groups. This move, intended to create a sustainable platform independent of , was perceived by many volunteer administrators as an authoritarian shift toward a corporate structure, undermining the project's original decentralized, volunteer-led ethos rooted in local communities. Administrators argued that the app's development, which included potential monetization elements to fund operations, contradicted the gift economy's principles by introducing top-down control and risking exclusion of users unable to afford any future fees. The dispute, dubbed the "battle for the soul" of the project, intensified in the official Admin Hub—a private group for over 5,000 moderators—where dissent against the app and incorporation was voiced. and responded by removing hundreds of administrators from the Hub for opposing the changes, including those who created alternative groups or publicly criticized the direction, leading to accusations of silencing dissent and enforcing loyalty to the founders' vision. In response, numerous local groups splintered, with some renaming themselves "Gifting with " to preserve the original guidelines without affiliation to the centralized entity; for instance, by February 2023, multiple communities had adopted this branding to signal independence. The founders reportedly flagged the Gifting with support group to , resulting in its deletion in December 2022, further fueling claims of efforts to suppress competing networks. These schisms fractured the project's governance, as the structure centralized authority with the founders while local admins retained operational control over groups but lost access to official resources. By mid-2023, the official project claimed over 7,000 groups, but splinter factions continued to operate parallel networks, highlighting a persistent divide between the founders' push for through and technology and admins' preference for autonomy. As of 2025, repercussions lingered, with the 's legal framework complicating hybrid volunteer-corporate dynamics, as evidenced by ongoing reports of group leaders navigating affiliation rules amid unresolved trust issues from the 2023 purge.

Practical and Scalability Issues

Users frequently report operational challenges stemming from rule violations, such as items for personal stockpiling or resale, and scams involving no-show pickups or deceptive requests for valuables. In one documented case from October 2025, a local group member posted about needing to borrow household items as a new , only for suspicions to arise regarding fraudulent intent. Similar anecdotes describe recipients claiming multiple items without genuine need, then reselling them on secondary markets, undermining the no-profit despite explicit prohibitions. Coordinating gifting incurs significant time and logistical burdens, including photographing items, requests, scheduling pickups, and handling flakes, which often negate the perceived value of "free" goods. A April 2025 personal account in recounts how participation led to accumulating unwanted clutter, with the mental overhead of sorting and storing outpacing any utility or decluttering benefits. Moderators expend additional unpaid hours enforcing norms like curbside drop-offs to minimize direct interactions, yet persistent no-shows and disputes erode giver enthusiasm. The hyper-local structure fosters functionality in small, trust-based neighborhoods but struggles to scale in densely populated urban environments, where participant anonymity facilitates abuse and dilutes accountability. Group rules in cities like Jersey City impose strict verification to curb by outsiders, reflecting inherent tensions in expanding beyond intimate scales. Efforts to broaden reach via apps aim to address geographic silos, yet core reliance on voluntary compliance limits viability in high-turnover, low-trust settings.

Ideological and Economic Critiques

Critics from free-market perspectives argue that initiatives like the Buy Nothing Project, by promoting gifting over market transactions, distort price signals that efficiently allocate resources and match supply to in consumer goods. In economic , prices convey information about and value, enabling producers and consumers to coordinate without central planning; gifting bypasses this, potentially leading to mismatches where donated items fail to meet recipients' preferences as effectively as purchased ones. This inefficiency mirrors the "deadweight loss" in traditional gift-giving, where the value recipients place on items is often lower than their production cost, as givers lack the recipient's full information on needs. The model's emphasis on overlooks how market incentives drive innovation in production and waste reduction, such as through resource-efficient and technologies, which have historically lowered per-unit waste in advanced economies more substantially than voluntary redistribution efforts. Data on the Buy Nothing Project's environmental impact remains unmeasured, despite claims of facilitating 2.6 million gifts monthly among 13 million participants, suggesting its scale may yield only marginal effects against global consumption volumes exceeding trillions in annual retail sales. In contrast, systemic market responses—like and optimizations—have contributed to declining waste intensities in sectors like and apparel, outpacing anti-consumerist initiatives. Ideologically, the project aligns with left-leaning critiques of as inherently wasteful, yet it fails to address root production drivers, such as profit motives responding to ; gifting merely recirculates existing without curbing upstream over-acquisition or . Participants may perpetuate consumption cycles by seeking "free" items they would otherwise forgo, undermining and potentially fostering dependency akin to inefficient systems, where unpriced access discourages prudent resource use. Economists note that such non-market exchanges can signal social bonds but at the cost of economic rationality, prioritizing communal reciprocity over individual accountability and innovation. This approach, while fostering local ties, risks normalizing a view that markets exacerbate rather than resolve it through and gains.

References

  1. http://buynothingproject.org/about
  2. http://buynothingproject.org/tpost/1hsmrslur1-a-brief-history-of-the-buy-nothing-proje
  3. https://www.wired.com/story/the-battle-for-buy-nothing/
  4. http://buynothingproject.org/media/presskit
  5. https://www.today.com/tmrw/how-buy-nothing-project-taught-me-rethink-how-i-shop-t228063
  6. https://buynothingproject.org/about-us
  7. https://buynothingproject.org/all-about-the-buy-nothing-project
  8. https://buynothingproject.org/growth-options
  9. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-05-17/coronavirus-economy-neighbors-barter-trade-produce
  10. https://fortune.com/2021/07/30/buy-nothing-facebook-group-pandemic-gift-economy-free-stuff/
  11. https://www.theverge.com/tech/2022/1/12/22878353/buy-nothing-groups-facebook-app
  12. https://www.curbed.com/2023/02/buy-nothing-gifting-with-integrity-drama.html
  13. https://www.marketplace.org/story/2023/05/16/what-happened-to-the-buy-nothing-project
  14. https://nygroove.nyc/buy-nothing-groups-leaving-facebook/
  15. https://buynothingproject.org/about
  16. https://buynothingproject.org/academy/lesson4
  17. https://buynothingproject.org/guidelines
  18. http://buynothingproject.org/guidelines
  19. http://buynothingproject.org/10-rules
  20. http://buynothingproject.org/howto
  21. https://www.honestlymodern.com/buy-nothing-groups-for-beginners/
  22. http://buynothingproject.org/fine-print-questions
  23. http://buynothingproject.org/member-resources
  24. http://help.buynothingproject.org/admin_agreement
  25. http://buynothingproject.org/sprouting-faqs
  26. http://buynothingproject.org/admins
  27. http://buynothingproject.org/growth-options
  28. http://buynothingproject.org/tpost/0z1u0kdhp1-buynothing-app-version-history
  29. https://www.facebook.com/BuyNothingProject/posts/were-excited-to-share-our-latest-buynothing-web-and-mobile-app-updatesif-youre-o/1076374841374488/
  30. https://www.facebook.com/BuyNothingProject/posts/opting-to-buy-nothing-does-not-mean-that-you-have-to-deprive-yourself-join-your-/938553508489956/
  31. http://buynothingproject.org/tpost/3b6hoh9jd1-buy-nothing-project-research-initiative
  32. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/239391/1/Asking_and_giving_in_your_local_neighbourhood_002_.pdf
  33. https://www.vox.com/the-goods/21427525/buy-nothing-gifting-facebook-groups-community-money-borrow-lend-trade
  34. https://nextcity.org/urbanist-news/the-buy-nothing-movement-is-restitching-our-social-fabric-one-gift-at-a-tim
  35. https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-buy-nothing-groups-women-outnumber-men-in-giving-away-2023-4
  36. https://arminda.whitman.edu/_flysystem/fedora/2024-08/berman_a.pdf
  37. https://www.paloaltoonline.com/blogs/a-new-shade-of-green/2021/08/22/the-growing-appeal-of-buy-nothing-groups/
  38. https://www.facebook.com/groups/2946551075478315/posts/3523950787738338/
  39. https://www.reddit.com/r/Scams/comments/1nzeciy/facebook_buy_nothing_group/
  40. https://www.reddit.com/r/ChoosingBeggars/comments/1kk5aui/buy_nothing_community_grab/
  41. https://www.reddit.com/r/perth/comments/1jau3qv/buy_nothing_group_a_rant/
  42. https://www.businessinsider.com/stopped-using-buy-nothing-groups-free-stuff-2025-4
  43. https://www.reddit.com/r/declutter/comments/1d2cezn/has_anyone_heard_of_scams_in_buy_nothing_groups_a/
  44. https://www.buynothingproject.org/about
  45. https://www.reddit.com/r/jerseycity/comments/1egshqb/why_do_the_buy_nothing_groups_gatekeep_so_heavily/
  46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780246
  47. https://fs.blog/the-economic-inefficiency-of-gift-giving-why-you-shouldnt-buy-presents-for-the-holidays/
  48. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-efficiency-of-gift-giving-is-it-really-better-to-give-than-to-receive/
  49. https://iea.org.uk/blog/the-troubled-economics-of-anti-consumerism/
  50. http://buynothingproject.org/
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550923002981
  52. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics/article/dynamic-efficiency-of-gifting/FDC663C9C0AC7498C8AD2811CDA77936
  53. https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/gift-giving-is-better-for-society-than-economists-think/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.