Hubbry Logo
Castello PlanCastello PlanMain
Open search
Castello Plan
Community hub
Castello Plan
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Castello Plan
Castello Plan
Castello Plan
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The original city map, 1660
Redraft of the Castello Plan of New Amsterdam in 1660, redrawn in 1916 by John Wolcott Adams and Isaac Newton Phelps Stokes

The Castello Plan – officially entitled Afbeeldinge van de Stadt Amsterdam in Nieuw Neederlandt (Dutch, "Picture of the City of Amsterdam in New Netherland") – is an early city map of what is now the Financial District of Lower Manhattan, created from a 1660 original. It was created by Jacques Cortelyou, a surveyor in what was then called New Amsterdam – later renamed by the settlers of the New York settlement as New York City, with its Fort Amsterdam as the center of trade and government.

Around 1667, cartographer Joan Blaeu bound the "Castello Plan" to an atlas, together with other hand-crafted New Amsterdam depictions. He sold the atlas to Cosimo III de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany. This transaction most likely happened in Amsterdam, as it has not been proven that Blaeu ever visited New Netherland.[1]

The plan remained in Italy, where in 1900 it was discovered at the Villa di Castello near Florence. It was printed in 1916 and received the name "Castello Plan" at that time.

It is covered extensively in Volume 2 of Isaac Newton Phelps Stokes' six-volume survey, The Iconography of Manhattan Island (1915–1928).[2]

A Castello Plan monument is installed at Lower Manhattan's Peter Minuit Plaza. On modern-day Cortelyou Road in Brooklyn's Ditmas Park neighborhood, there is a tavern named The Castello Plan.[3] The map itself, normally kept in Florence at the Laurentian Library, was exhibited at the New-York Historical Society in 2024.[4]

The copy held in the New York Public Library is was created around 1665 to 1670 by an unknown draughtsman, based on a lost Cortelyou original.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Stokes, 1915b, v. ii, p. xxvii
  2. ^ Stokes, 1915b, v. ii
  3. ^ "— Story —". 29 July 2019.
  4. ^ Davidson, Justin (March 13, 2024). "The Streets of Pre–New York". Curbed. Retrieved March 20, 2024.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Castello Plan

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Castello Plan is a detailed map of , the Dutch colonial settlement at the southern tip of (now ), created in 1660 by surveyor Jacques Cortelyou on behalf of the . It depicts a walled town of approximately 1,500 inhabitants, including , Peter Stuyvesant's house, over 300 structures such as houses, farms, taverns, and workshops, as well as canals, docks, ships, and the rudimentary palisade that later defined the city's financial district. Commissioned by the city's burgomasters to report on development amid criticisms from company directors, the map was sent to and bound into an atlas by cartographer around 1667, providing a snapshot of the colony just before its English capture in 1664 and renaming as New York. Rediscovered in 1900 at the near , —where it had remained in private hands—the map earned its name from that and was first published in 1916, becoming a cornerstone for historical and archaeological studies of 17th-century urban life in the . Its orientation with northwest at the top and inclusion of orchards, gardens, and beached vessels highlight the settlement's agricultural roots, ethnic diversity (including Dutch, English, French, and enslaved African populations), and global trade connections, while also underscoring darker legacies such as Indigenous dispossession and the institution of slavery. Today, the original resides in the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana in , with modern reproductions, including interactive 3D models, aiding ongoing research into New York's foundational layout and evolution from a colonial outpost to a metropolis.

History

Creation

The Castello Plan was created in 1660 by Jacques Cortelyou, the surveyor general for the in . Cortelyou, a French Huguenot born around 1625 in to refugee parents from , , had immigrated to in 1652 as a tutor to the children of a prominent Dutch settler before rising to his role. Commissioned at the height of New Amsterdam's expansion under Director-General , the map served to meticulously record the settlement's urban layout, supporting colonial administration through detailed property and population documentation, informing defense strategies amid regional tensions, and promoting the colony to potential European investors via an accompanying census sent to . Officially titled Afbeeldinge van de Stadt Amsterdam in Nieuw Neederlandt (Image of the City Amsterdam in New Netherland), the original was rendered in ink and watercolor on , spanning roughly 45 by 60 cm, with an orientation placing north to the right for a bird's-eye perspective centered on .

Acquisition and Early Fate

Following the English capture of New Amsterdam in September 1664, during which Dutch Director-General surrendered the colony without significant resistance, the settlement was renamed New York in honor of the , rendering the 1660 plan obsolete for practical administrative purposes. The original vellum version of the plan, surveyed by Jacques Cortelyou under the direction of Stuyvesant to document the city's layout and fortifications, was likely sent to the in shortly after its completion but has since been lost. Its survival today relies on a copy produced between 1665 and 1670 by an unknown draughtsman in Amsterdam, which was based on a now-lost intermediate version possibly created in Vingboons' workshop. Around 1667, the surviving copy was bound into a multi-volume atlas compiled by the renowned Amsterdam cartographer (or his son Pieter), as part of a larger collection of hand-painted maps and views depicting global , including other representations of and the . This atlas, known as part of the Carte di Castello collection, was acquired by , then of , during his extended grand tour of (1667–1669), a diplomatic journey aimed at fostering alliances, studying innovations, and expanding the Medici court's intellectual and artistic holdings. The purchase, which included 65 such maps from the Blaeu workshop in December 1667, reflected Cosimo's interest in as a tool for understanding global trade routes and colonial empires, though no specific acquisition price for the atlas is recorded. Upon Cosimo's return to , where he ascended as in 1670, the atlas was integrated into the Medici collections and stored initially at the near , later transferred to the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana. There, amid the vast Medici archives of manuscripts and artworks, the plan remained largely overlooked and forgotten through the 18th and into the , overshadowed by more prominent European-focused materials and unaffected by the shifting political fortunes of the Medici dynasty.

Rediscovery

The Castello Plan was rediscovered in 1900 at the near , , where it had been preserved in the Medici family archives since the . This find brought to light the oldest known detailed map of , offering unprecedented insights into the Dutch colonial settlement just prior to the English conquest in 1664. The map received its name, "Castello Plan," from the location of its rediscovery, and its first printed facsimile appeared in I. N. Phelps Stokes's multi-volume work The Iconography of Manhattan Island, 1498–1909 (1915–1928). Stokes's publication included a high-fidelity reproduction alongside scholarly analysis evaluating the plan's accuracy in depicting the city's layout, structures, and , confirming its status as a for 17th-century urban development. This edition marked the map's entry into broader academic discourse, with Stokes and collaborators like John Wolcott Adams producing a precise redraft in 1916 to aid interpretation. Following its rediscovery, the plan underwent authentication by Dutch and American historians, who cross-referenced it with contemporary documents to validate its details on fortifications, streets, and property divisions. Today, the original manuscript resides in the (Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana) in . In the early , the map generated significant excitement among scholars, serving as key evidence to reconstruct Dutch colonial urban layouts during a period of heightened interest in American historical and city origins.

Description

Layout and Scale

The original Castello Plan is a manuscript drawn on vellum, measuring approximately 450 mm by 610 mm. Its scale is roughly 1:1,200, though irregular due to the artistic conventions prevalent in 17th-century Dutch urban mapping, which prioritized pictorial representation over precise measurement. The employs a orientation with northwest at the top, adhering to traditional Dutch cartographic practices for depicting cities and emphasizing the settlement's waterfront profile along the rivers. This layout facilitates a comprehensive view of the urban structure, with the island's southern tip positioned to highlight its defensive and navigational features. The plan delineates boundaries encompassing about 25 hectares (63 acres) of Lower Manhattan's southern tip, spanning from the Battery to the vicinity of modern and incorporating the to the east and the North ( to the west. This focused extent captures the walled core of , excluding outlying farms and plantations. Cartographically, it features a non-uniform scale that exaggerates individual building sizes for legibility, alongside hachures to denote subtle and color coding to differentiate land uses, such as red washes for rooftops and green for gardens or open spaces. Street alignments exhibit minor distortions relative to subsequent 18th-century surveys, attributable to the expedited on-site sketching process by surveyor Jacques Cortelyou. Recent GIS analyses confirm these details while refining counts, such as 253 houses.

Depicted Elements

The Castello Plan vividly illustrates the physical layout of in 1660, highlighting key structures, infrastructure, and land features through detailed ink and watercolor depictions. At the southern tip of , the central fort, known as , dominates the scene as the administrative and defensive core of the settlement. The fort is shown with four stone-faced bastions, a surrounding moat, earth parapets, and multiple cannons mounted on its walls, reflecting ongoing repairs and reinforcements completed around 1660 using gabions, palisades, and labor from masons and enslaved workers. Inside the fort, key buildings include the governor's house, barracks, a (Gevangen Huys), and a storehouse or officers' quarters, underscoring its multifaceted role. Urban features are densely packed within the walled town, comprising over 300 structures, including mostly wood-frame houses for approximately 300 households and indicating a of 1,000 to 1,500 residents. Prominent landmarks include a positioned northwest of the fort on Stuijvesant's Hoogh, used for grinding grain and depicted as an essential civic structure. The 1644 church, also functioning as the Weigh House, appears near the Pearl Street pier, serving both religious and commercial purposes with its completion by 1654 and later sale of an older structure in 1659. The Stadt Herberg, or city inn (also called the ), is illustrated as a multi-story building on Hoogh Straet, constructed in 1641–1642 and repurposed as the Stadt Huys (City Hall) with a in 1653. Infrastructure elements emphasize the settlement's connectivity and defense, with dirt streets such as Broadway (labeled Heere Straet or Great Highway) running northward as a main thoroughfare lined with houses and markets. A wooden palisade wall, erected in 1653 and repaired with planks by 1655, encircles the town along the line of modern , featuring six masonry bastions and two gates for protection. Along the East and North Rivers, docks and wharves extend into the harbor, including the Wijnbruch pier (87 feet long) at Schreyers Hook with a crane for loading goods, and additional waterfront structures like warehouses facilitating trade. Land use is depicted through varied symbols representing residential, agricultural, and spaces outside the main walls. Private gardens and orchards, such as the with flower beds and fruit trees or individual plots like Augustine Herrman's and Hendrick van Dyck's, fill rear lots between streets, showcasing Dutch horticultural practices. Public squares include the field at Marckvelt Steegh (east of the fort) and a square on Brugh Steegh, laid out between 1659 and 1660 for communal use. A is shown outside the walls near Pearl and Streets, symbolizing judicial authority, while simple icons denote the households across blocks. Annotations enhance the map's detail with Dutch-language labels for locations, such as "Stuijvesant’s Hoeck," "Heere ," and "Vis marckt" (), alongside property owner names like Oloff Stevensen van Cortlandt and Cornelis Steenwyck. Population estimates of 1,000–1,500 are implied through the house symbols and contextual notes, while decorative elements like ships in the harbor add a nautical flourish, emphasizing the port's vitality.

Significance

Role in Colonial Urban Planning

The Castello Plan exemplifies the defensive imperatives central to Dutch colonial in , portraying a fortified settlement with a wooden wall encircling the town and at its southern tip. Constructed between 1653 and 1663 under Director-General Peter Stuyvesant's orders, the —spanning approximately 3,200 feet from the Hudson to the —featured five bastions equipped with cannons and a protective to counter threats from Indigenous groups, as seen in the 1655 attacks that prompted urgent reinforcements. This layout drew directly from European fortress designs in the , such as Amsterdam's 1544 earthen walls and moats, but adapted wooden palisades to the colony's resource constraints and frontier vulnerabilities. The plan also captures the organic expansion of from dispersed farm plots, or bouweries, established in the 1620s to a compact urban core by 1660, with approximately 300 structures arranged along emerging grid-like streets. Initial settlement focused on agricultural lots radiating from the fort, but population growth to around 1,500 inhabitants drove development, incorporating natural features like Indian paths (e.g., Broadway) and streams into the street network rather than imposing a rigid grid from the outset. This evolutionary pattern reflected pragmatic responses to Manhattan's hilly and limited land, transitioning from rural enclosures to a walled town oriented toward commerce. As a key administrative tool for the (WIC), the 1660 survey by Jacques Cortelyou, surveyor general under Stuyvesant, facilitated precise land allocation to settlers and company officials, enabling taxation based on property holdings and enforcement of trade regulations. The WIC used the plan to document urban boundaries, allocate waterfront lots for strategic purposes, and oversee municipal through the board of burgomasters, who regulated building alignments and spaces for order and defense. This bureaucratic application underscored the map's role in transforming into a viable colonial outpost, with Stuyvesant's administration leveraging it to resolve disputes over bouweries and expand taxable urban territory. In comparison to metropolitan models, the Castello Plan adapted elements of Amsterdam's -based —such as the Heere Graft, a short along present-day Broad Street inspired by Dutch waterway engineering—to Manhattan's irregular terrain, prioritizing drainage and navigation over expansive grids. Unlike the formalized layouts of some contemporaneous European colonies, it emphasized topographic accommodation, with streets following contours rather than straight lines. Following the English conquest in , the plan's irregular pattern persisted in early surveys like the Nicolls Map of circa 1668, contrasting sharply with the later 1811 Commissioners' Plan, which imposed a uniform grid across the island, overlaying but not erasing Dutch organic influences. Economically, the plan highlights New Amsterdam's orientation toward Atlantic commerce, with extensive waterfront docks and wharves along the dominating the layout to support the fur trade, which funneled beaver pelts from Indigenous partners to European markets via WIC ships. Streets like (castellum) radiated from these shipping hubs, underscoring the settlement's function as a point rather than a self-sufficient agrarian center, and integrating trade infrastructure like warehouses directly into the urban fabric. This focus on maritime access, evident in the plan's depiction of over a dozen vessels, positioned the colony as a in the WIC's , prioritizing over expansive residential planning.

Insights into 17th-Century Society

The Castello Plan offers a window into the ethnic diversity of New Amsterdam's population around 1660, estimated at approximately 1,500 residents, with Dutch settlers forming the largest group alongside smaller contingents of French Huguenots, English immigrants, and a nascent Jewish community of about two dozen individuals. These groups are not individually symbolized on the map but are reflected through the clustered housing patterns and institutional structures that accommodated a multilingual, multicultural under Dutch colonial administration. Markings on the plan, including outlying farms and trade-oriented docks, allude to ongoing interactions with the indigenous (specifically the subgroup), whose presence extended beyond the walled settlement despite prior conflicts. These depictions highlight trade posts where Europeans exchanged goods like furs and with communities, though they also underscore lingering tensions from events such as (1643–1645), a brutal conflict initiated by Dutch Director that resulted in significant Native casualties and reshaped colonial-Indigenous relations. The map's notations for labor-intensive sites, such as farms and waterfront docks, point to the vital role of approximately enslaved Africans, comprising about 16% of the total population of roughly 1,875 residents (1,500 whites, enslaved, and 75 freed Blacks) in 1664, with similar figures likely applicable to 1660, and primarily owned by the . These individuals performed essential work in agriculture, construction, and shipping, laying the groundwork for later sites like the African Burial Ground, which became a repository for the remains of early enslaved people and their descendants after 1660. Social hierarchies are evident in the plan's differentiation of house sizes, with larger, more prominent structures clustered near indicating wealthier Dutch officials and merchants, while smaller dwellings housed laborers and artisans further out. Public spaces, including market areas along the waterfront, facilitated communal economic activities that reinforced these class divisions, with household counts suggesting patriarchal family units where gender roles aligned with European norms of male-headed homes and female domestic contributions. Cultural symbols on the map, such as the used for grain processing and the church representing the dominance of the Dutch Reformed Protestant faith, encapsulate a that was multicultural in composition yet rigidly hierarchical in practice, blending European traditions with the exigencies of colonial expansion. This portrayal reveals a striving for order amid diversity, where religious and economic institutions served to integrate disparate groups under Dutch authority.

Legacy

Reproductions and Exhibitions

The first high-quality reproduction of the Castello Plan was created in 1916 by cartographer John Wolcott Adams, under the supervision of I.N. Phelps Stokes, as a detailed redraft in color wash on paper measuring 25 by 35 centimeters. This version, oriented with north to the right and depicting the of New Amsterdam's layout including buildings, streets, and fortifications, was prepared for inclusion in Stokes' multi-volume Iconography of Manhattan Island and marked the map's initial widespread dissemination beyond scholarly circles. In the , digital reconstructions have brought the plan to life through interactive 3D models, notably the one developed by the New Amsterdam History Center starting around 2022. This model renders the 1660 settlement in three dimensions, allowing users to explore individual structures like houses, farms, and the defensive wall while overlaying it onto contemporary for comparative visualization. The tool supports virtual navigation and educational applications, highlighting the plan's spatial details such as the grid of streets and waterfront features. Public exhibitions have showcased the original plan and its reproductions, with a prominent display from March 15 to July 14, 2024, at the New-York Historical Society titled New York Before New York: The Castello Plan of . Organized to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the Dutch colony's founding, the installation featured the original manuscript on loan from Italy's Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana alongside the New Amsterdam History Center's 3D model, documents, and artifacts to illustrate daily life in the settlement. In 2025, the interactive 3D model was featured in the exhibition New Visions of Old New York at the Municipal Archives in , opening on January 23 and running through December 2025. This display includes an oversized touchscreen for exploring the model, emphasizing the plan's role in understanding early New York history. A bronze monument commemorating the plan's layout was unveiled on May 12, 2011, at Plaza in 's Battery Park. Sculpted by Simon Verity and Martha Finney as a three-dimensional on a tiger-stripe , it depicts key elements of the 1660 map at the plaza's entrance, serving as a public tribute to New Amsterdam's urban form. High-resolution scans of the original and redraft versions are accessible online through institutional repositories, including the New York Public Library's digital collections and the New-York Historical Society's archives, facilitating virtual tours and scholarly study without physical access to the artifact. These scans, often exceeding 10,000 pixels in width, enable detailed examination of features like individual building outlines and annotations.

Influence on Modern Scholarship

The Castello Plan has served as a foundational in early 20th-century historical scholarship on New York City's urban development, particularly through I. N. Phelps Stokes's multi-volume The Iconography of Manhattan Island, 1498-1909 (1915-1928), which reproduced and analyzed the plan to trace the island's evolution from Dutch to modern , correcting prevailing myths about its pre-colonial and early colonial layout. Stokes's work emphasized the plan's accuracy in depicting 1660-era structures and streets, establishing it as a benchmark for subsequent cartographic and historical studies of the region. Archaeological excavations in the late further validated the plan's depictions, aligning physical evidence with its mapped building locations and boundaries. Digs at the Stadt Huys site (1979-1980), New York City's first major urban archaeology project, uncovered foundations of the 17th-century city hall and tavern complex precisely where the plan indicated, confirming its reliability as a contemporary survey. Similarly, 1990s investigations at the African Burial Ground site referenced the plan to contextualize colonial-era and , revealing how it documented areas later used for burials outside the settled core. In , the plan has illuminated Dutch influences on New York City's formation, as explored in Russell Shorto's The Island at the Center of the World (2004), which draws on it to highlight multicultural interactions and the colony's role in shaping American pluralism. Methodologically, scholars have integrated the plan into GIS-based reconstructions for comparative colonial studies, enabling spatial analysis of New Amsterdam's layout to underscore its diverse European, African, and Indigenous origins. Post-2000 scholarship has used the plan to address historiographical gaps, particularly the roles of enslaved labor and Indigenous erasure. Andrea Mosterman's Spaces of Enslavement: A History of Slavery and Resistance in Dutch New York (2021) interprets its symbols—such as household plots and —to reveal how enslaved Africans contributed to the city's infrastructure, often invisibly in the map's settler-centric view. Recent analyses also critique the plan's omission of Indigenous presence, employing it to reconstruct land use and highlight colonial displacement in decolonial frameworks.

References

  1. https://newamsterdamhistorycenter.org/learn-explore/the-castello-plan-new-amsterdam-in-1660/
  2. https://old.skyscraper.org/EXHIBITIONS/WALL_STREET/new_amsterdam.php
  3. https://www.nyhistory.org/exhibitions/new-york-before-new-york-the-castello-plan
  4. https://www.newyorkalmanack.com/2020/10/huguenot-pirates-on-the-barbary-coast-and-the-mapping-of-new-amsterdam/
  5. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/castello-plan-map-new-york-history
  6. https://www.nc-chap.org/castello/castello_key_notes4.pdf
  7. https://heald.nga.gov/mediawiki/index.php/Special:URIResolver/File-3A0250.jpg-23Creation
  8. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/spotlight-primary-source/surrender-new-netherland-1664
  9. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/digital/collections/cul/texts/ldpd_5800727_001/ldpd_5800727_001.pdf
  10. https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/107471/1/The_Global_Eye.pdf
  11. https://www.nypl.org/events/exhibitions/galleries/new-york-city/item/11315
  12. https://www.6sqft.com/early-map-of-manhattan-on-display-at-new-york-historical-society/
  13. http://www.nyc99.org/1600/castillo.html
  14. https://www.nyhistory.org/press/presents-castello-plan-of-new-amsterdam
  15. https://www.bml.firenze.sbn.it/
  16. https://vitabrevis.americanancestors.org/2021/05/the-iconography-of-manhattan
  17. https://archive.org/details/iconographyofman_b03stok
  18. https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47e4-7369-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99
  19. https://www.gothamcenter.org/blog/notes-on-the-planned-town-of-fort-amsterdam
  20. https://www.nc-chap.org/castello/index.php
  21. https://archive.org/download/iconographyofman01stok/iconographyofman01stok.pdf
  22. http://daytoninmanhattan.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-lost-1641-stadt-huys-broad-and.html
  23. https://www.archives.nyc/blog/2017/3/9/the-dutch-the-english-part-3-construction-of-the-wall-1653-1663
  24. https://s-media.nyc.gov/agencies/lpc/lp/1235.pdf
  25. https://academic.oup.com/book/2269/chapter/142375786
  26. https://www.untappedcities.com/heere-graft-of-dutch-new-amsterdam-the-lost-17th-century-canal-that-once-ran-down-broad-street-in-lower-manhattan/
  27. https://doi.org/10.1179/0309656415Z.00000000075
  28. https://www.newyorkalmanack.com/2020/07/kiefts-war-against-native-people-a-primer/
  29. https://maap.columbia.edu/place/8.html
  30. https://merchantshouse.org/blog/manuel-plaza/
  31. https://www.forbes.com/sites/janelevere/2024/01/30/museum-to-show-1660-new-amsterdam-map-to-mark-dutch-colonys-founding/
  32. https://newamsterdamhistorycenter.org/learn-explore/full-3d-model/
  33. https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/new-amsterdam-1660-a34eebc7966c4589934afb2334e182b6
  34. https://newamsterdamhistorycenter.org/fat-event/new-visions-of-old-new-york/
  35. https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/battery-park/monuments/2103
  36. https://www.gsa.gov/system/files/Vol2-Part1-TheArchaeologyOfTheNYABG-2_Chapter1-3_Part1.pdf
  37. https://www.aci-iac.ca/the-essay/a-vision-for-the-future-by-nick-estes/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.