Hubbry Logo
WindmillWindmillMain
Open search
Windmill
Community hub
Windmill
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Windmill
Windmill
Windmill
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The windmills at Kinderdijk in the village of Kinderdijk, Netherlands, is a UNESCO World Heritage Site

A windmill is a machine operated by the force of wind acting on vanes or sails to mill grain (gristmills), pump water, generate electricity, or drive other machinery.[1] Windmills were used throughout the high medieval and early modern periods; the horizontal or panemone windmill first appeared in Persia during the 9th century, and the vertical windmill first appeared in northwestern Europe in the 12th century.[2][3] Regarded as an icon of Dutch culture,[4] there are approximately 1,000 windmills in the Netherlands today.[5]

Forerunners

[edit]
A 19th-century reconstruction of Heron's wind-powered organ

Wind-powered machines have been known earlier, the Babylonian emperor Hammurabi had used wind mill power for his irrigation project in Mesopotamia in the 17th century BC.[6]

Later, Hero of Alexandria (Heron) in first-century Roman Egypt described what appears to be a wind-driven wheel to power a machine.[7][8] His description of a wind-powered organ is not a practical windmill but was either an early wind-powered toy or a design concept for a wind-powered machine that may or may not have been a working device, as there is ambiguity in the text and issues with the design.[9] Another early example of a wind-driven wheel was the prayer wheel, which is believed to have been first used in Tibet and China, though there is uncertainty over the date of its first appearance, which could have been either c. 400, the 7th century,[10] or after the 9th century.[9]

One of the earliest recorded working windmill designs found was invented sometime around 700–900 AD in Persia.[11][12] This design was the panemone, with vertical lightweight wooden sails attached by horizontal struts to a central vertical shaft. It was first built to pump water and subsequently modified to grind grain as well.[13][14]

Horizontal windmills

[edit]
Main article: Panemone windmill
Further information: Vertical axis wind turbine
The Persian horizontal windmill, the first practical windmill.
Hooper's Mill, Margate, Kent, an eighteenth-century European horizontal windmill

The first practical windmills were panemone windmills, using sails that rotated in a horizontal plane, around a vertical axis. Made of six to 12 sails covered in reed matting or cloth material, these windmills were used to grind grain or draw up water.[15] A medieval account reports that windmill technology was used in Persia and the Middle East during the reign of Rashidun caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab (r. 634–644), based on the caliph's conversation with a Persian builder slave.[16] The authenticity of part of the anecdote involving the caliph Umar is questioned because it was recorded only in the 10th century.[17] The Persian geographer Estakhri reported windmills being operated in Khorasan (Eastern Iran and Western Afghanistan) already in the 9th century.[18][19] Such windmills were in widespread use across the Middle East and Central Asia and later spread to Europe, China, and India from there.[20] By the 11th century, the vertical-axle windmill had reached parts of Southern Europe, including the Iberian Peninsula (via Al-Andalus) and the Aegean Sea (in the Balkans).[21] A similar type of horizontal windmill with rectangular blades, used for irrigation, can also be found in thirteenth-century China (during the Jurchen Jin dynasty in the north), introduced by the travels of Yelü Chucai to Turkestan in 1219.[22]

Vertical-axle windmills were built, in small numbers, in Europe during the 18th and nineteenth centuries,[15] for example Fowler's Mill at Battersea in London, and Hooper's Mill at Margate in Kent. These early modern examples seem not to have been directly influenced by the vertical-axle windmills of the medieval period, but to have been independent inventions by 18th-century engineers.[23]

Vertical windmills

[edit]
A windmill in Kotka, Finland in May 1987

The horizontal-axis or vertical windmill (so called due to the plane of the movement of its sails) is a development of the 12th century, first used in northwestern Europe, in the triangle of northern France, eastern England and Flanders.[24] It is unclear whether the vertical windmill was influenced by the introduction of the horizontal windmill from Persia-Middle East to Southern Europe in the preceding century.[25][26]

The earliest certain reference to a windmill in Northern Europe (assumed to have been of the vertical type) dates from 1185, in the former village of Weedley in Yorkshire which was located at the southern tip of the Wold overlooking the Humber Estuary.[27] Several earlier, but less certainly dated, 12th-century European sources referring to windmills have also been found.[28] These earliest mills were used to grind cereals.[29]

Post mill

[edit]
Main article: Post mill

The evidence at present is that the earliest type of European windmill was the post mill, so named because of the large upright post on which the mill's main structure (the "body" or "buck") is balanced. By mounting the body this way, the mill can rotate to face the wind direction; an essential requirement for windmills to operate economically in north-western Europe, where wind directions are variable. The body contains all the milling machinery. The first post mills were of the sunken type, where the post was buried in an earth mound to support it. Later, a wooden support was developed called the trestle. This was often covered over or surrounded by a roundhouse to protect the trestle from the weather and to provide storage space. This type of windmill was the most common in Europe until the 19th century when more powerful tower and smock mills replaced them.[30]

Hollow-post mill

[edit]

In a hollow-post mill, the post on which the body is mounted is hollowed out, to accommodate the drive shaft.[31] This makes it possible to drive machinery below or outside the body while still being able to rotate the body into the wind. Hollow-post mills driving scoop wheels were used in the Netherlands to drain wetlands since the early 15th century onwards.[32]

Tower mill

[edit]
Main article: Tower mill
Windmill in the Azores islands, Portugal.
Tower mills in Consuegra, Spain

By the end of the 13th century, the masonry tower mill, on which only the cap is rotated rather than the whole body of the mill, had been introduced. The spread of tower mills came with a growing economy that called for larger and more stable sources of power, though they were more expensive to build. In contrast to the post mill, only the cap of the tower mill needs to be turned into the wind, so the main structure can be made much taller, allowing the sails to be made longer, which enables them to provide useful work even in low winds. The cap can be turned into the wind either by winches or gearing inside the cap or from a winch on the tail pole outside the mill. A method of keeping the cap and sails into the wind automatically is by using a fantail, a small windmill mounted at right angles to the sails, at the rear of the windmill. These are also fitted to tail poles of post mills and are common in Great Britain and English-speaking countries of the former British Empire, Denmark, and Germany but rare in other places. Around some parts of the Mediterranean Sea, tower mills with fixed caps were built because the wind's direction varied little most of the time.[citation needed]

Smock mill

[edit]
Main article: Smock mill
Two smock mills with a stage in Greetsiel, Germany

The smock mill is a later development of the tower mill, where the masonry tower is replaced by a wooden framework, called the "smock", which is thatched, boarded, or covered by other materials, such as slate, sheet metal, or tar paper. The smock is commonly of octagonal plan, though there are examples with different numbers of sides.

Smock windmills were introduced by the Dutch in the 17th century to overcome the limitations of tower windmills, which were expensive to build and could not be erected on wet surfaces. The lower half of the smock windmill was made of brick, while the upper half was made of wood, with a sloping tower shape that added structural strength to the design. This made them lightweight and able to be erected on unstable ground.

The smock windmill design included a small turbine in the back that helped the main mill to face the direction of the wind.[33]

Mechanics

[edit]

Sails

[edit]
Main article: Windmill sail
Windmill in Kuremaa, Estonia
5-sail Holgate windmill in York, England

Common sails consist of a lattice framework on which the sailcloth is spread. The miller can adjust the amount of cloth spread according to the wind and the power needed. In medieval mills, the sailcloth was wound in and out of a ladder-type arrangement of sails. Later mill sails had a lattice framework over which the sailcloth was spread, while in colder climates, the cloth was replaced by wooden slats, which were easier to handle in freezing conditions.[34] The jib sail is commonly found in Mediterranean countries and consists of a simple triangle of cloth wound round a spar.[35]

In all cases, the mill needs to be stopped to adjust the sails. Inventions in Great Britain in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries led to sails that automatically adjust to the wind speed without the need for the miller to intervene, culminating in patent sails invented by William Cubitt in 1807. In these sails, the cloth is replaced by a mechanism of connected shutters.[citation needed]

In France, Pierre-Théophile Berton invented a system consisting of longitudinal wooden slats connected by a mechanism that lets the miller open them while the mill is turning. In the twentieth century, increased knowledge of aerodynamics from the development of the airplane led to further improvements in efficiency by German engineer Bilau and several Dutch millwrights. The majority of windmills have four sails. Multiple-sailed mills, with five, six, or eight sails, were built in Great Britain (especially in and around the counties of Lincolnshire and Yorkshire), Germany, and less commonly elsewhere. Earlier multiple-sailed mills are found in Spain, Portugal, Greece, parts of Romania, Bulgaria, and Russia.[36] A mill with an even number of sails has the advantage of being able to run with a damaged sail by removing both the damaged sail and the one opposite, which does not unbalance the mill.

De Valk windmill in mourning position following the death of Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands in 1962

In the Netherlands, the stationary position of the sails, i.e. when the mill is not working, has long been used to give signals. If the blades are stopped in a "+" sign (3-6-9-12 o'clock), the windmill is open for business. When the blades are stopped in an "X" configuration, the windmill is closed or not functional. A slight tilt of the sails (top blade at 1 o'clock) signals joy, such as the birth of a healthy baby. A tilt of the blades to 11-2-5-8 o'clock signals mourning, or warning. It was used to signal the local region during Nazi operations in World War II, such as searches for Jews. Across the Netherlands, windmills were placed in mourning positions in honor of the Dutch victims of the 2014 Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 shootdown.[37]

Machinery

[edit]
Main article: Mill machinery

Gears inside a windmill convey power from the rotary motion of the sails to a mechanical device. The sails are carried on the horizontal windshaft. Windshafts can be wholly made of wood, wood with a cast iron pole end (where the sails are mounted), or entirely of cast iron. The brake wheel is fitted onto the windshaft between the front and rear bearings. It has the brake around the outside of the rim and teeth in the side of the rim which drives the horizontal gearwheel called wallower on the top end of the vertical upright shaft. In grist mills, the great spur wheel, lower down the upright shaft, drives one or more stone nuts on the shafts driving each millstone. Post mills sometimes have a head and/or tail wheel driving the stone nuts directly, instead of the spur gear arrangement. Additional gear wheels drive a sack hoist or other machinery. The machinery differs if the windmill is used for other applications than milling grain. A drainage mill uses another set of gear wheels on the bottom end of the upright shaft to drive a scoop wheel or Archimedes' screw. Sawmills uses a crankshaft to provide a reciprocating motion to the saws. Windmills have been used to power many other industrial processes, including papermills, threshing mills, and to process oil seeds, wool, paints, and stone products.[38]

Spread and decline

[edit]
A windmill in Wales, United Kingdom. 1815.
Don Quixote being struck by a windmill (1863 illustration by Gustave Doré).
Egbert Lievensz van der Poel, Windmill Fire (17th century), National Museum in Kraków
Oilmill De Zoeker, paintmill De Kat and paltrok sawmill De Gekroonde Poelenburg at the Zaanse Schans

In the 14th century, windmills became popular in Europe; the total number of wind-powered mills is estimated to have been around 200,000 at the peak in 1850, which is close to half of the some 500,000 water wheels.[34] Windmills were applied in regions where there was too little water, where rivers freeze in winter and in flat lands where the flow of the river was too slow to provide the required power.[34] With the coming of the Industrial Revolution, the importance of wind and water as primary industrial energy sources declined, and they were eventually replaced by steam (in steam mills) and internal combustion engines, although windmills continued to be built in large numbers until late in the nineteenth century. More recently, windmills have been preserved for their historic value, in some cases as static exhibits when the antique machinery is too fragile to be put in motion, and other cases as fully working mills.[39]

Of the 10,000 windmills in use in the Netherlands around 1850,[40] about 1,000 are still standing. Most of these are being run by volunteers, though some grist mills are still operating commercially. Many of the drainage mills have been appointed as a backup to the modern pumping stations. The Zaan district has been said to have been the first industrialized region of the world with around 600 operating wind-powered industries by the end of the eighteenth century.[40] Economic fluctuations and the industrial revolution had a much greater impact on these industries than on grain and drainage mills, so only very few are left.

Construction of mills spread to the Cape Colony in the seventeenth century. The early tower mills did not survive the gales of the Cape Peninsula, so in 1717 the Heeren XVII sent carpenters, masons, and materials to construct a durable mill. The mill, completed in 1718, became known as the Oude Molen and was located between Pinelands Station and the Black River. Long since demolished, its name lives on as that of a Technical school in Pinelands. By 1863, Cape Town had 11 mills stretching from Paarden Eiland to Mowbray.[41]

Modern windmills

[edit]

Wind turbines

[edit]
Main articles: Wind power and High-altitude wind power
A group of wind turbines in Zhangjiakou, Hebei, China
A wind turbine in Huikku, Hailuoto, Finland

A wind turbine is a windmill-like structure specifically developed to generate electricity. They can be seen as the next step in the development of the windmill. The first wind turbines were built by the end of the nineteenth century by James Blyth in Scotland (1887),[42] Charles F. Brush in Cleveland, Ohio (1887–1888)[43][44] and Poul la Cour in Denmark (1890s). La Cour's mill from 1896 later became the local power of the village of Askov. By 1908, there were 72 wind-driven electric generators in Denmark, ranging from 5 to 25 kW. By the 1930s, windmills were widely used to generate electricity on farms in the United States where distribution systems had not yet been installed, built by companies such as Jacobs Wind, Wincharger, Miller Airlite, Universal Aeroelectric, Paris-Dunn, Airline, and Winpower. The Dunlite Corporation produced turbines for similar locations in Australia.[citation needed]

Forerunners of modern horizontal-axis utility-scale wind generators were the WIME-3D in service in Balaklava, USSR, from 1931 until 1942, a 100 kW generator on a 30-metre (98 ft) tower,[45] the Smith–Putnam wind turbine built in 1941 on the mountain known as Grandpa's Knob in Castleton, Vermont, United States, of 1.25 MW,[46] and the NASA wind turbines developed from 1974 through the mid-1980s. The development of these 13 experimental wind turbines pioneered many of the wind turbine design technologies in use today, including steel tube towers, variable-speed generators, composite blade materials, and partial-span pitch control, as well as aerodynamic, structural, and acoustic engineering design capabilities. The modern wind power industry began in 1979 with the serial production of wind turbines by Danish manufacturers Kuriant, Vestas, Nordtank, and Bonus. These early turbines were small by today's standards, with capacities of 20–30 kW each. Since then, commercial turbines have increased greatly in size, with the Enercon E-126 capable of delivering up to 7 MW, while wind turbine production has expanded to many countries.[citation needed]

As the 21st century began, rising concerns over energy security, global warming, and eventual fossil fuel depletion led to an expansion of interest in all available forms of renewable energy. Worldwide, many thousands of wind turbines are now operating, with a total nameplate capacity of 591 GW as of 2018.[47]

Materials

[edit]
Main article: Wind turbine design

In an attempt to make wind turbines more efficient and increase their energy output, they are being built bigger, with taller towers and longer blades, and being increasingly deployed in offshore locations.[48][49] While such changes increase their power output, they subject the components of the windmills to stronger forces and consequently put them at a greater risk of failure. Taller towers and longer blades suffer from higher fatigue, and offshore windfarms are subject to greater forces due to higher wind speeds and accelerated corrosion due to the proximity to seawater. To ensure a long enough lifetime to make the return on the investment viable, the materials for the components must be chosen appropriately.

The blade of a wind turbine consists of 4 main elements: the root, spar, aerodynamic fairing, and surfacing. The fairing is composed of two shells (one on the pressure side, and one on the suction side), connected by one or more webs linking the upper and lower shells. The webs connect to the spar laminates, which are enclosed within the skins (surfacing) of the blade, and together, the system of the webs and spars resist the flapwise loading. Flapwise loading, one of the two different types of loading that blades are subject to, is caused by the wind pressure, and edgewise loading (the second type of loading) is caused by the gravitational force and torque load. The former loading subjects the spar laminate on the pressure (upwind) side of the blade to cyclic tension-tension loading, while the suction (downwind) side of the blade is subject to cyclic compression-compression loading. Edgewise bending subjects the leading edge to a tensile load, and the trailing edge to a compressive load. The remainder of the shell, not supported by the spars or laminated at the leading and trailing edges, is designed as a sandwiched structure, consisting of multiple layers to prevent elastic buckling.[50]

In addition to meeting the stiffness, strength, and toughness requirements determined by the loading, the blade needs to be lightweight, and the weight of the blade scales with the cube of its radius. To determine which materials fit the criteria described above, a parameter known as the beam merit index is defined: Mb = E^1/2 / rho,[51] where E is Young's modulus and rho is the density. The best blade materials are carbon fiber and glass fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP and GFRP). Currently, GFRP materials are chosen for their lower cost, despite the much greater figure of merit of CFRP.[52]

Recycling and waste problems with polymers blades

[edit]

When the Vindeby Offshore Wind Farm was taken down in Denmark in 2017, 99% of the not-degradable fiberglass from 33 wind turbine blades ended as cut up at the Rærup Controlled Landfill near Aalborg and in 2020, with considerably larger fiberglass quantities, even though it is the least environmentally friendly way of handling waste.[citation needed] Scrapped wind turbine blades are set to become a huge waste problem in Denmark and countries Denmark, to a greater and greater extent, export its many produced wind turbines.[53][54][55]

"The reason why many wings end up in landfill is that they are incredibly difficult to separate from each other, which you will have to do if you hope to be able to recycle the fiberglass", says Lykke Margot Ricard, Associate Professor in Innovation and Technological Foresight and education leader for civil engineering in Product Development and Innovation at the University of Southern Denmark (SDU). According to Dakofa, the Danish Competence Center for Waste and Resources, there is nothing specific in the Danish waste order about how to handle discarded fiberglass.[53][56]

Several scrap dealers tell Ingeniøren that they have handled wind turbine blades (wings) that have been pulverized after being taken to a recycling station.[57] One of them is the recycling company H.J. Hansen, where the product manager informed, that they have transported approximately half of the wings they have received since 2012 to Reno Nord's landfill in Aalborg. A total of around 1,000 wings have ended up there, he estimates - and today up to 99 percent of the wings the company receives end up in a landfill.[58]

Since 1996, according to an estimate made by Lykke Margot Ricard (SDU) in 2020, at least 8,810 tonnes of the wing scrap have been disposed of in Denmark, and the waste problem will grow significantly in the coming years when more and more wind turbines have reached their end of life. According to the SDU lecturer's calculations, the waste sector in Denmark will have to receive 46,400 tonnes of fiberglass from wind turbine blades over the next 20–25 years.[58]

As so, at the island, Lolland, in Denmark, 250 tonnes of fiberglass from wind turbine waste also pours up on a landfill at Gerringe in the middle of Lolland in 2020.[57][59]

In the United States, worn-out wind turbine blades made of fiberglass go to the handful of landfills that accept them (e.g., in Lake Mills, Iowa; Sioux Falls, South Dakota; Casper).[60]

Windpumps

[edit]
Main article: Windpump
Aermotor-style windpump in South Dakota, US
Windpump in far western New South Wales, Australia

Windpumps were used to pump water since at least the 9th century in what is now Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan.[19] The use of windpumps became widespread across the Muslim world and later spread to East Asia (China) and South Asia (India).[61] Windmills were later used extensively in Europe, particularly in the Netherlands and the East Anglia area of Great Britain, from the late Middle Ages onwards, to drain land for agricultural or building purposes.

The "American windmill", or "wind engine", was invented by Daniel Halladay in 1854[62] and was used mostly for lifting water from wells. Larger versions were also used for tasks such as sawing wood, chopping hay, and shelling and grinding grain.[62] In early California and some other states, the windmill was part of a self-contained domestic water system which included a hand-dug well and a wooden water tower supporting a redwood tank enclosed by wooden siding known as a tankhouse. During the late 19th century, steel blades and towers replaced wooden construction. At their peak in 1930, an estimated 600,000 units were in use.[63] Firms such as U.S. Wind Engine and Pump Company, Challenge Wind Mill and Feed Mill Company, Appleton Manufacturing Company, Star, Eclipse, Fairbanks-Morse, Dempster Mill Manufacturing Company, and Aermotor became the main suppliers in North and South America. These windpumps are used extensively on farms and ranches in the United States, Canada, Southern Africa, and Australia. They feature a large number of blades, so they turn slowly with considerable torque in low winds and are self-regulating in high winds. A tower-top gearbox and crankshaft convert the rotary motion into reciprocating strokes carried downward through a rod to the pump cylinder below. Such mills pumped water and powered feed mills, sawmills, and agricultural machinery.

In Australia, the Griffiths Brothers at Toowoomba manufactured windmills of the American pattern from 1876, with the trade name Southern Cross Windmills in use from 1903. These became an icon of the Australian rural sector by utilizing the water of the Great Artesian Basin.[64] Another well-known maker was Metters Ltd. of Adelaide, Perth and Sydney.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Windmill

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A windmill is a mechanical device that converts the of into rotational mechanical power via sails or vanes attached to a horizontal shaft, primarily employed for grinding into or pumping from lowlands. Originating in Persia around the 7th to 9th centuries AD for and milling, the technology spread westward to by the 12th century, where innovations like the —featuring a rotatable body to orient sails into the —enabled efficient operation independent of watercourses. The Dutch refined windmill designs in the 13th century, constructing thousands for large-scale land drainage via systems of coupled mills and Archimedean screws, reclaiming vast polders from the sea and supporting in a low-lying nation. Principal types evolved to include the fixed-tower mill with a pivoting cap and the , a multi-sided wooden structure resembling a smock, both allowing heavier gearing for increased productivity in processing and industrial tasks like sawmilling. Though mechanized alternatives diminished their practical role by the , surviving windmills exemplify pre-industrial prowess in exploiting renewable forces for sustained mechanical output.

Etymology and Definition

Terminology and Historical Naming

The term windmill refers to a mechanical device that captures wind energy via sails or blades to drive a rotating shaft for tasks such as milling, , or sawing timber, with origins tracing to pre-industrial eras. This usage contrasts with , a 20th-century designation for electricity-generating machines featuring high-altitude rotors connected to generators, emphasizing the functional shift from direct mechanical output to electrical conversion. The distinction arose as modern designs scaled up—reaching heights of 280 feet (85 meters) versus traditional windmills under 80 feet (24 meters)—and prioritized aerodynamic efficiency over multi-purpose milling. Etymologically, windmill derives from Middle English windmille, combining (from Old English wind, denoting air motion) and mille (from Latin molina, a grinding mill), with the compound first attested in English texts around the late . Earlier roots connect to Old English mylen for mills powered by various means, but wind-specific terminology proliferated in following the adoption of wind-driven grinding mechanisms by the . In continental languages, equivalents like Dutch windmolen (wind + mill) or French moulin à vent (wind mill) emerged concurrently, reflecting parallel technological diffusion. Historical naming of windmills emphasized structural typology, location, ownership, or function, evolving with design advancements. The , Europe's earliest documented horizontal-axis type appearing in by 1180, earned its name from the central upright timber post enabling the entire body to pivot into the wind via tailpole or . By the 13th century, the —with its static or brick tower and independently rotating cap—supplanted posts in fixed installations, named for the prominent cylindrical tower housing gears and stones. Dutch innovations yielded the in the early 17th century, so called for its multi-sided, timber-framed body with weatherboarded, smock-like slopes aiding stability and weatherproofing. In regions like the , where over 9,000 windmills operated by the , proprietary names often incorporated symbolic or aspirational elements, such as De Valk (The Falcon, denoting speed) or De Goede Hoop (The Good Hope), alongside functional descriptors like poldermolen for drainage mills. English conventions favored locative or forms, e.g., "Fowler's Mill" for owner-operated sites or "Keston Windmill" for geographic ties, a persisting in inventories from the medieval period onward. Earlier non-European precedents included Persian vertical-axis mills from the 7th–9th centuries, retrospectively termed panemone (Greek for "rag-sailed," all-wind driven) in modern scholarship, though contemporary texts used functional descriptors like wind-driven grinders without standardized typology. These naming practices underscore causal adaptations to local engineering needs, from pivoting posts for variable winds to fixed towers for durability, rather than uniform nomenclature.

Core Principles of Operation

Windmills convert the kinetic energy of wind into mechanical rotational energy through sails or blades mounted on a horizontal shaft, which rotates under the force exerted by wind on the sail surfaces. This force arises primarily from drag in traditional designs, where the sails act as flat or adjustable surfaces perpendicular to the wind direction, though some configurations incorporate lift from angled or shuttered sails to enhance torque. The mill must be oriented (yawed) into the prevailing wind to maximize efficiency, achieved manually in early post mills by rotating the entire structure or via a tailpole and fantail in later tower and smock mills. The rotational motion of the windshaft is transmitted through a series of wooden to deliver power to the intended application, such as grinding or pumping water. Typically, the windshaft connects to a large brake wheel, which engages with a wallower on a vertical upright shaft, reducing speed while increasing ; this upright shaft then drives a great spur wheel that powers horizontal millstones via stone nuts or, in drainage mills, connects to an or pump via additional gearing. Gear ratios vary by design and purpose—for instance, grain mills prioritize slower, higher- for the millstones (around 100-150 rpm), while pumping mills may use direct or simpler transmission for steady output. Power output depends on wind speed, sail area, and mechanical efficiency, with historical European windmills producing 10-40 horsepower in winds of 25 mph under optimal conditions, though actual efficiency was limited by friction, variable winds, and rudimentary aerodynamics yielding power coefficients far below modern theoretical limits. To control speed and prevent damage, operators use brakes on the brake wheel and adjust sail configuration, such as opening shutters on common sails to reduce drag in gusts. This mechanical system embodies causal energy transfer from wind's momentum to useful work, without electrical generation, distinguishing traditional windmills from contemporary turbines.

Historical Development

Ancient and Early Forerunners

The earliest recorded instance of harnessing wind power for mechanical work on land dates to the 1st century AD, when Hero of Alexandria described a windwheel connected to a pipe organ. This device featured a horizontal-axis rotor driving a piston to force air through organ pipes, marking the first known application of wind as a motive force for machinery rather than propulsion at sea. Hero's mechanism, detailed in his treatise Pneumatica, utilized wind to rotate a wheel that operated bellows, producing musical tones, though it remained a novelty without widespread practical adoption. Practical windmills emerged later in Persia, where vertical-axis designs known as panemone mills were developed between approximately 500 and 900 AD for grinding grain and pumping water. These early machines featured a vertical driveshaft with 6 to 12 rectangular blades covered in reed matting or cloth, arranged parallel to the axis to capture wind from any direction, distinguishing them from later horizontal-axis European models. Archaeological evidence from sites like Nashtifan in northeastern includes structures estimated at around 1,000 years old, constructed from clay, straw, and wood, which continue to demonstrate the durability and efficiency of this configuration in arid regions. In parallel, rudimentary wind-powered devices appeared in by the 12th century during the , likely influenced by Central Asian designs, including vertical-axis mills for water-lifting with sails resembling revolving lanterns. These "Great Windmills" employed chains of buckets driven by wind to irrigate fields, representing an independent adaptation suited to agricultural needs in eastern . Unlike the Persian mills, Chinese variants prioritized vertical-axis efficiency for multi-directional winds but saw limited proliferation before the introduction of horizontal designs. These ancient forerunners laid foundational principles for wind utilization, emphasizing drag-based sails and vertical shafts for omnidirectional operation, which addressed variable patterns in inland areas where water power was scarce. Their development predated European horizontal windmills by centuries, driven by necessities in dry climates for autonomous mechanical power independent of animal or human labor.

Medieval Innovations in the Islamic World and Europe

The earliest documented windmills emerged in the region of Sistan in eastern Persia (modern-day Iran and Afghanistan) during the 7th to 9th centuries AD, featuring a vertical-axis design with fixed vertical sails arranged around a central mast, known as panemone mills. These structures harnessed prevailing winds to rotate a horizontal shaft connected to grindstones for milling grain, representing an adaptation to arid environments where water power was scarce. The vertical-axis configuration allowed operation with winds from multiple directions without mechanical orientation, though efficiency was limited compared to later horizontal designs; archaeological evidence from sites like Nashtifan supports continuous use of similar mills for over a millennium. In the broader Islamic world, these Persian innovations spread eastward to and influenced water-pumping applications, with texts from the describing geared mechanisms to amplify for and drainage. Innovations included adjustable coverings and multi-stage gearing, predating European equivalents by centuries and facilitating agricultural expansion in wind-rich desert fringes. European windmills developed independently in the late , with the first textual records appearing in in 1180, in 1181, and in 1191, primarily as horizontal-axis post mills for grinding grain. The post mill's defining feature was its rotatable body mounted on a central post, enabling manual reorientation into the wind via a tailpole, which addressed variable wind directions more effectively than fixed Islamic designs. By the 13th century, over 6,000 windmills operated in alone, driven by feudal demands for production and the limitations of watermills during dry seasons. Medieval European advancements focused on structural durability and , incorporating wooden cog-and-pinion to step down high-speed from sails to low-speed millstones, achieving outputs of up to 20 horsepower in optimal conditions. These mills proliferated along coastal and flatland regions of the , from the to the Baltic, supporting by mechanizing labor-intensive tasks previously reliant on animal or human power. While some transmission of vertical-axis concepts occurred via trade routes around 1105 AD, European adoption favored horizontal-axis post mills for their superior in gusty winds.

Early Modern Proliferation and Adaptations

During the , from the 16th to the 18th centuries, windmills proliferated across , particularly in the and , driven by agricultural and needs. In the , windmills numbered in the thousands by the , with estimates reaching up to 9,000 by the early , many constructed during the preceding centuries for draining polders and processing goods amid the . These structures enabled extensive , transforming low-lying marshes into arable fields through chained systems of mills pumping water via screws. In , windmills adapted for grain milling spread widely, with innovations borrowed from Dutch designs facilitating greater efficiency in rural economies. Key adaptations included the development of the , a timber-framed structure with a sloping body that allowed for larger, more stable mills compared to earlier post mills. The first reference to smock mills appears in the around 1526, with the oldest surviving example in dating to 1650 in Lacey Green, . Dutch engineers also scaled tower mills to heights of by 1604, enhancing power output for industrial uses like sawmilling and oil pressing. Sail improvements, such as common sails with adjustable slats, optimized wind capture, while mechanical advancements like enhanced braking systems and automatic sail reefing reduced manual labor. In , the 1745 invention of the fantail by Edmund Lee marked a significant , automating mill orientation into the wind and improving operational reliability over tailpole methods. Dutch innovations extended beyond , with the VOC introducing wind- and watermills to Asian colonies from the 1650s to 1800, adapting them for local rice husking and irrigation. Despite these advances, transitions to fully self-regulating mills varied; the excelled in incremental improvements for drainage, while Britain saw uneven adoption due to competition from watermills and steam. These developments peaked windmill utility before the [Industrial Revolution](/page/Industrial Revolution) shifted reliance to fossil fuels.

Traditional Designs

Horizontal-Axis Windmills

Horizontal-axis windmills feature a main shaft aligned parallel to the ground, with sails or blades extending radially to capture perpendicular to the axis, converting into rotational mechanical power through drag and later aerodynamic lift principles. This configuration dominated European traditional designs from the onward, enabling efficient power generation for milling and pumping in variable directions via mechanisms to orient the . Unlike earlier vertical-axis panemone mills in Persia, horizontal-axis models required yawing systems to face , driving innovations in structural pivoting and gearing. The , the earliest horizontal-axis type, emerged in 12th-century and , consisting of a wooden buck or body mounted on a central vertical post supported by a trestle, allowing the entire structure to rotate for alignment. Manual tailpole operation oriented the mill, but this demanded frequent labor and limited scale due to the pivoting mass; by the 15th century, post mills numbered thousands across , primarily for grain grinding via internal millstones driven by bevel gears from the horizontal shaft. Their lightweight timber construction facilitated portability but exposed them to weather damage, with survival rates low as stone alternatives proliferated. Tower mills, appearing by the late 13th century in regions like and the , addressed post mill limitations through a fixed cylindrical tower of or stone—typically 6 to 12 stories high—topped by a rotatable housing the sails and windshaft. This design concentrated weight below the pivot, enabling larger sails for increased and height for stronger winds aloft; internal winding gear or fantail mechanisms automated yawing from the . Predominant in Mediterranean and Atlantic coastal areas, tower mills powered diverse applications including land drainage, with over 10,000 operational in alone by 1800, though maintenance of proved costlier in seismic or flood-prone zones. Smock mills, a Dutch innovation from the early , employed multi-sided wooden frameworks clad in weatherboard, tapering upward like a smock for structural rigidity and reduced wind resistance, with only the cap rotating atop the fixed body. Common stock construction used prefabricated segments for quicker assembly and relocation, suiting the ' polder reclamation needs where over 9,000 windmills operated by the for water lifting via scoop wheels. Their hybrid wood-frame approach balanced durability against post mills' fragility and tower mills' immobility, incorporating stage sails for finer control; by the , smock mills spread to Britain and , adapting to industrial precursors with metal reinforcements. Across these types, relied on a horizontal windshaft bearing the , coupled to a wallower gear on the vertical upright shaft, then stepped down via great spur wheel to millstones or pumps, achieving output ratios of 1:100 or more for fine grinding. Empirical records indicate post mills yielded 1-2 horsepower in moderate winds, scaling to 10-20 in tower and smock variants, contingent on sail area—up to 200 square meters in advanced Dutch examples—though efficiency hinged on sail pitch and fabric tension to mitigate stalling. These designs' causal reliance on consistent wind regimes favored open, elevated sites, influencing dense clusters like the 19 surviving mills at , , operational from the for collective drainage.

Vertical-Axis Windmills

Vertical-axis windmills, known as asbads in Persian, constitute the earliest documented form of wind-powered grinding machinery, developed in the region of eastern around the 7th to 9th centuries CE. These devices harnessed drag forces from to rotate a vertical shaft connected to millstones, automating grain milling in arid environments where water-powered mills were impractical. Historical records indicate their use for grinding and other grains, as well as and sugar cane , with the relying on seasonal "120-day winds" reaching speeds up to 100 km/h. The core design features a fixed vertical with drag-type blades, typically constructed from reeds, wooden planks, or cloth sails arranged around a central shaft, often enclosed within a multi-chambered mud-brick or clay-straw wall up to 20 meters tall to channel unidirectional . Unlike horizontal-axis mills, these panemone-style required no yaw mechanism, as the enclosing structure directed to push exposed vanes while sheltering the return side, enabling continuous in consistent wind directions. Power transmission occurred via a vertical shaft linked directly to horizontal grindstones weighing up to 900 kg on the ground floor, producing through mechanical . This drag-based operation yielded lower efficiency compared to later lift-based designs—typically converting only a fraction of wind due to high drag on the leeward blades—but proved robust and low-maintenance for localized, intermittent use. Prominent examples persist in Nashtifan village near Khaf in northeastern , where approximately two dozen vertical-axis windmills, some over 1,000 years old and standing 20 meters high, remain partially operational for grain milling. These structures, built with local clay, , and wood, feature eight chambers each containing six blades, and have endured due to adaptive repairs amid harsh conditions, though maintenance challenges from a declining skilled workforce threaten their function. Larger complexes, such as those with up to 40 mills aligned side-by-side on elevated ridges, optimized collective wind capture in and Baluchestan provinces. The technology spread from to other Islamic regions by the and to during the Mongol era, influencing early vertical-axis applications there for and salt production until the mid-20th century. While eventually supplanted by more efficient horizontal-axis mills in from the onward, vertical-axis designs demonstrated causal advantages in turbulent or unidirectional wind regimes, requiring minimal materials and space for deployment in resource-scarce settings. Their persistence underscores empirical adaptations to local climates, prioritizing reliability over peak output.

Engineering Mechanics

Sails, Blades, and Aerodynamics

Traditional windmill sails, typically mounted on horizontal-axis rotors, evolved from simple drag-based designs to configurations incorporating lift for improved . Early medieval European sails consisted of rectangular panels stretched over a wooden lattice framework attached to radial , presenting a relatively flat surface inclined at a fixed to the rotor plane, which primarily harnessed drag forces as impinged perpendicularly on the fabric. These common sails, common in post mills from the onward, required manual adjustment by or furling to manage varying speeds, limiting operation to moderate conditions. By the 18th century, Dutch engineers introduced spring sails (also called patent or compass sails), featuring adjustable wooden slats along leading and trailing edges that could be opened or closed via a mechanism linked to the fantail, allowing dynamic control of sail camber and angle of attack. This design approximated an airfoil profile, enabling the sails to generate significant lift in addition to drag, with the lift component derived from pressure differentials across the sail surface per Bernoulli's principle and Newton's third law acting on the deflected airflow. The adjustable slats permitted optimization for wind speeds up to 10-12 m/s, reducing stall risk and increasing torque by balancing the perpendicular (drag) and tangential (lift-derived) force components on the rotor. Aerodynamically, sail performance depends on the angle of attack, typically 15-25 degrees for optimal lift-to-drag ratios in traditional designs, where the apparent —combining rotational speed and free-stream velocity—creates a resolved into axial and rotational . Unlike pure drag devices such as Persian panemone mills, which stalled beyond half the rotor circumference due to shadowing, lift-augmented s sustained rotation across the full cycle by minimizing drag on the retreating side through reduced ( area to swept area ratio, often 0.1-0.2). Empirical tests on 19th-century Dutch mills showed power coefficients (Cp) up to 0.25-0.3, far exceeding drag-only Cp of ~0.08, though still below modern limits due to variable geometry and material constraints. In the early , further refinements included airfoil-shaped leading edges (e.g., Dekker designs circa ), which streamlined and boosted by 20-30% over traditional spring sails, bridging traditional windmills toward modern blade . These evolutions underscored causal reliance on lift dominance for scalability, as drag-limited sails inherently capped power extraction per derivations applied retrospectively.

Gearing, Machinery, and Power Transmission

In traditional horizontal-axis windmills, gearing and machinery transmit rotational power from the slowly turning sails to end-use mechanisms like millstones or pumps, multiplying while reducing speed through successive gear stages. The windshaft, a horizontal timber extending from the sails into the mill's or body, bears the brake wheel, a large toothed rim typically 10 feet (3 meters) in diameter constructed from staves with inserted cast-iron cogs for durability and precise meshing. This wheel engages the wallower, a affixed to the top of the vertical upright shaft, directing power downward through the mill's multi-story structure. The gear ratio between the brake wheel and wallower provides an initial step-up in rotational speed, as the larger brake wheel (often with 50-70 teeth or cogs) drives a smaller wallower (typically 30-40 teeth), yielding ratios around 1.2:1 to 2:1 depending on design. For instance, a 52-tooth brake wheel meshing with a 42-tooth wallower achieves approximately a 1.24:1 ratio, increasing shaft speed while conserving power for subsequent reductions. The upright shaft, spanning multiple floors, terminates in the great spur wheel on the stone or meal —a horizontal gear with 80-120 wooden teeth—that drives smaller stone nuts (spur of 20-30 teeth) linked to the upper spindles, effecting a final high-ratio reduction of 4:1 or more per pair to achieve speeds of 20-40 from sail tip speeds of 10-20 rpm in moderate winds. Materials evolved from all-wooden components, prone to wear, to hybrid systems with iron cogs and lanterns by the 18th-19th centuries for reduced and . In post mills, the entire cap assembly—including windshaft and initial gearing—yaw rotates atop the fixed , complicating transmission, whereas tower and smock mills employ stationary upright shafts for smoother power flow. Braking occurs via blocks or bands applied to the brake wheel's rim, halting motion during high winds or ; disengagement allows freewheeling. For water-pumping mills, gearing adapts to reciprocating rods or cams via additional wheels, prioritizing over rotary grinding. Overall transmission efficiency reached 50-70% in well-maintained mills, limited by wooden bearing and variability, enabling outputs of 5-25 horsepower (3.7-18.6 kW) in gales, sufficient to grind 100-200 kg of hourly or at rates of 1-2 cubic meters per minute.

Applications and Impacts

Grain Milling, Water Pumping, and Other Uses

Windmills have been employed for grain milling since at least the in Persia, where vertical-axis designs ground grain using wind-driven sails connected to horizontal millstones. By the in , horizontal-axis post mills facilitated grinding by transferring rotational energy from sails through gearing to turn an upper runner stone against a stationary bed stone, with grain fed centrally and ground collected from the base. This process relied on the differential speed of stones, typically achieving mechanical efficiencies of 20-30 percent due to losses in wooden gears and bearings. In regions like the and , thousands of windmills processed for local communities, with output varying by ; a typical 18th-century Dutch mill could grind 1-2 tons of daily under optimal conditions of 10-15 m/s winds. The mechanism involved a windshaft driving a wallower gear, then a vertical shaft to stone nuts engaging the millstones, allowing adjustable grinding . Water pumping emerged as a primary application in the Netherlands from the 13th century, enabling land reclamation by draining low-lying polders. Windmills powered Archimedean screws or scoop wheels to lift water from ditches to higher canals, with the Kinderdijk complex—comprising 19 mills constructed between 1738 and 1740—illustrating a chain of up to eight mills sequentially pumping water over dikes to prevent flooding in a 10-square-kilometer area. Each mill could displace 1-3 cubic meters of water per minute at moderate winds, achieving up to 50 percent efficiency in hydraulic output due to optimized gearing for continuous operation. This system supported agriculture on otherwise unusable peatlands, with over 9,000 Dutch windmills operational by the 18th century for drainage. Beyond milling and pumping, windmills drove diverse , including sawmilling for timber cutting, where reciprocating saws processed logs into planks at rates of several cubic meters per day in 17th-century Dutch operations. Oilseed pressing extracted vegetable oils via cam-driven presses, while production involved beating pulp in vats powered by similar crankshaft mechanisms. In colonial America, windmills cut wood at sawmills and processed dyes or paints, though less efficiently than water-powered alternatives in consistent flow areas. mills separated grain from chaff, and some adapted for hulling or cocoa, demonstrating wind power's versatility in pre-industrial economies before steam engines displaced them in the 19th century.

Economic and Agricultural Contributions

Windmills enhanced agricultural productivity primarily through grain milling and water management, enabling expanded food production and land utilization in regions with suitable wind resources. In medieval and early modern Europe, their chief role involved grinding grain into flour, supplanting manual labor and animal-powered methods to process larger volumes efficiently; a typical western European family consumed about 1.2 units of grain-based food annually, underscoring the scale of milling demand met by such machines. This mechanization reduced dependency on human or draft animal power, particularly in northern Europe where labor shortages incentivized wind adoption for cultivation and processing. In the , windmills facilitated extensive by pumping water from low-lying polders and lakes, converting wetlands into arable farmland essential for sustaining and export-oriented . By the , these machines drained peatlands, though subsequent from peat extraction posed ongoing challenges; approximately 10% of Dutch territory derives from such reclamations, with windmills integral to the process. At their zenith, over 9,000 windmills operated across the country, handling tasks like pumping and drainage to support , , and horticultural outputs. Economically, windmills underpinned proto-industrial activities beyond agriculture, powering sawmills for timber processing that fueled Dutch shipbuilding during the , alongside oilseed pressing, production, and other trades. From 1600 to 1750, roughly 1,000 industrial windmills were constructed in key areas like the Zaan region, contributing to the ' status as a commercial powerhouse by leveraging abundant winds for cost-effective energy. Later designs, such as tower and smock mills, boosted milling capacity over predecessors, with records indicating higher output potentials advertised for grain and fodder processing. These contributions fostered rural manufacturing integration with agriculture, though windmills' intermittency limited scalability compared to emerging technologies.

Spread, Adaptation, and Decline

Geographical Diffusion

The earliest windmills, vertical-axis designs with woven-reed blades for grinding grain, appeared in Persia and the by the AD. These devices featured horizontal sails on a vertical shaft and spread across the and , with later adoption in regions including and . Horizontal-axis windmills, characterized by vertical sails on a horizontal shaft mounted atop a tower or post, originated in during the . The first documented European windmill appeared in , , in 1180, followed by records in in 1181 and in 1191. These post mills, which could be rotated to face the wind, proliferated across for grain milling and water management, adapting to local needs through innovations like fixed towers and smock designs. In the , windmills arrived by the early and underwent rapid expansion due to the country's low-lying terrain and need for drainage. By the , Dutch engineers refined tower mills for large-scale reclamation, with peak numbers exceeding 9,000 in the before power reduced reliance. Dutch designs influenced neighboring regions, including and , where similar tower mills supported in windy areas like . European colonists introduced windmills to the in the colonial period, with the first constructed in in 1621 for grinding grain on plantations. Additional early examples followed in , such as in 1631, adapting post and smock mills for settlement expansion. Over time, these technologies diffused to , , and other settler frontiers, evolving into lighter pumping variants for arid plains by the .

Industrial Competition and Obsolescence

The introduction of steam engines in the late initiated direct competition with windmills across , as steam provided consistent mechanical power regardless of wind availability, enabling operations in enclosed factories and during calm periods that halted wind-driven machinery. In milling and sawing applications, steam engines scaled output more predictably; for instance, the Albion Mill in , equipped with a 150 horsepower Watt engine in 1786, processed 10 bushels of per hour, surpassing the variable capacity of contemporary windmills. This reliability advantage stemmed from steam's fuel-based operation, which decoupled energy production from meteorological dependence, allowing industrialists to meet growing demand for grain, timber, and textiles without downtime risks inherent to wind intermittency. In the , windmills reached a peak of approximately 9,000 units around 1850, supporting drainage, grinding, and in regions like the Zaan district, where over 450 sawmills operated by 1731. adoption accelerated their decline from the mid-19th century, with polder boards initially resisting but ultimately favoring pumps for due to higher uptime and capacity; by the early , about 5,000 of the 1850 total had vanished, followed by sharper drops post-1910 as electric and diesel alternatives emerged. The shift reflected causal economics: windmills required large land footprints and frequent maintenance for sails and gearing, while centralized power in compact, urban-adjacent facilities, aligning with and factory systems. Britain experienced parallel obsolescence, with steam supplanting wind and water mills from the mid-19th century; the 1881 installation of the first roller mill at Chelsea marked a technological leap, using steam-driven steel rollers to yield finer, uniform flour unattainable by wind-powered stone grinding. Within three decades, over three-quarters of such traditional mills were abandoned or demolished, as roller systems integrated with steam enabled mass production that windmills could not match in consistency or volume. In the United States, windmills adapted for rural water pumping evaded early steam competition, aiding by supplying boiler water across expanding railroads from the . Production peaked in 1928 at 99,050 units annually, supporting agriculture where wind prevalence offset steam's fuel . Obsolescence arrived later with under the in the 1930s and widespread internal combustion engines, which offered portable, on-demand pumping without wind reliance; by the 1970s, gas and electric alternatives had largely supplanted windmills in the South and Southwest due to superior efficiency in variable conditions.

Modern Windmills

Small-Scale and Revival Uses

Small-scale windmills, typically featuring numerous blades for low-speed operation, remain in use for mechanical on farms and in arid regions. These systems draw water from depths up to 100 meters, supporting , hydration, and without reliance on or . In the United States, over 200,000 such wind pumps were installed by the early , with thousands still operational as of for their durability and zero operational costs beyond occasional . Their efficiency derives from simple pumps geared to the rotor, yielding 1-5 liters per stroke at wind speeds as low as 3 m/s, though output varies cubically with wind . Revival efforts focus on restoring traditional post, tower, and smock mills for heritage preservation and limited production. In the , where windmills peaked at nearly 9,000 in the , about 1,200 survive, with roughly 200 actively milling or pumping on designated days to demonstrate original gearing and mechanics. Restoration projects, often funded by cultural agencies, replace decayed wooden components with period-authentic materials while incorporating modern safety features like reinforced brake systems. For instance, mills at sites like undergo cyclical maintenance every 10-15 years to sustain functionality amid demands, producing specialty flours that command premium prices due to artisanal appeal. In other European contexts, similar initiatives adapt mills for and flood control. Greek restorations on the employ perforated sails—a patented increasing by 20-30% in variable winds—to revive functions on over 20 mills since 2015. French enthusiasts refurbish 19th-century iron turbines for mechanical power, emphasizing operations that educate on pre-industrial conversion. These revivals prioritize empirical replication of historical designs over , countering by leveraging wind's for non-baseload tasks like seasonal drainage. Economic viability hinges on and , as operational costs exceed output value without subsidies.

Large-Scale Wind Turbines

Large-scale wind turbines, also known as utility-scale wind turbines, are modern horizontal-axis machines designed primarily for grid-scale electricity generation, featuring three composite blades attached to a rotor hub mounted atop a tubular steel tower with hub heights typically exceeding 100 meters. These turbines employ aerodynamic lift to convert kinetic wind energy into rotational mechanical power, which is then transformed into electrical power via a gearbox and generator housed in the nacelle. Rated capacities for contemporary onshore models range from 2 to 5 megawatts (MW), while offshore variants often exceed 8 MW, with rotor diameters reaching 160-250 meters to capture more energy from lower wind speeds at elevated heights. Development of large-scale turbines accelerated in the late amid oil price shocks, with early prototypes like the U.S. Department of Energy's 2.5 MW MOD-0 series tested in the early , followed by commercialization in and where tax incentives spurred installations of hundreds of smaller (50-100 kW) units. By the 1990s, turbine sizes scaled to 1-2 MW through advances in materials like blades and variable-speed generators, enabling deployment in wind farms aggregating hundreds of MW. Global installed capacity grew from under 10 GW in 1990 to approximately 1,174 GW by early 2025, with 117 GW added in 2024 alone, predominantly onshore (93% of total) in regions like , which accounts for over half of new installations. Operational examples include offshore projects like the UK's Dogger Bank Wind Farm, phased to reach 3.6 GW with 13 MW turbines, and onshore bases such as China's Gansu Wind Farm exceeding 7 GW. The average rated capacity of newly installed turbines reached 5.5 MW in 2024, reflecting ongoing upscaling, though logistical challenges limit onshore growth compared to offshore where floating foundations enable access to stronger winds. Real-world capacity factors— the ratio of actual output to maximum possible—average 35-40% for onshore turbines, varying by site wind regime and dropping below 25% in low-resource areas, necessitating grid-scale backups for reliability.

Performance and Limitations

Efficiency, Reliability, and Intermittency Issues

Wind turbines exhibit capacity factors typically ranging from 25% to 45%, with a global average around 26% and U.S. onshore averages at 33.5% in 2023, reflecting the intermittent of wind speeds that rarely sustain rated power output. This efficiency is further constrained by the Betz limit, capping theoretical aerodynamic efficiency at 59%, though practical yields are lower due to mechanical losses, wake effects in arrays, and suboptimal site winds. Lifetime (EROI) for wind systems averages 10-20:1 in peer-reviewed assessments, but declines when accounting for backup generation and grid balancing required for intermittency. Reliability challenges arise from high component failure rates, averaging 3-8 failures per turbine per year across studies of operational fleets. Gearboxes represent a primary , with bearings accounting for 76% of gearbox failures, often leading to extended of weeks or months for repairs, particularly offshore where access is limited. Control systems and electrical components contribute additional failures at rates of about 2 per turbine annually, elevating operation and costs to 20-30% of levelized expenses over a 20-25 year lifespan. These rates exceed those of conventional plants, necessitating frequent interventions that reduce to 95% or less. Intermittency stems from wind's stochastic variability, with output fluctuating hourly and seasonally, complicating grid inertia and frequency regulation as penetration exceeds 20-30%. Empirical data from high-penetration systems show supply-demand imbalances, such as in Germany where 2023 curtailment reached 4% of potential wind generation (19 TWh) due to oversupply during gusts, alongside increased reliance on gas peakers for ramps. In regions like the UK and Denmark, wind droughts lasting days have prompted emergency imports or fossil dispatch, with studies indicating marginal curtailment rates 3+ times average at high penetrations, inflating system costs via overbuild and storage needs. Without sufficient dispatchable capacity, this variability risks blackouts, as evidenced by events in Texas (2021) and Europe (2022-2023), underscoring wind's dependence on hybrid systems for baseload viability.

Environmental Effects and Wildlife Impacts

Wind turbines contribute to lower greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels, with lifecycle emissions typically ranging from 9 to 34 grams of CO2 equivalent per , primarily from manufacturing and materials extraction rather than operation. This reduction in emissions occurs because operational displaces from and plants, avoiding associated air pollutants like and particulate matter. However, these benefits must account for upstream impacts, including energy-intensive production of , , and rare earth elements used in permanent magnet generators, which can increase global GHG emissions and during scaling of wind capacity. Construction and land use present additional environmental challenges. Turbine foundations and access roads lead to habitat fragmentation, soil erosion, and compaction, potentially harming subterranean species and altering local hydrology. Large-scale deployments require substantial land areas—farms can span thousands of acres—exacerbating these effects and conflicting with agriculture or conservation, though turbines occupy only a fraction of the total footprint due to spacing needs. Offshore installations may disrupt marine sediments and ecosystems during foundation installation, while rare earth mining for turbine components involves toxic waste, radioactive tailings, and water contamination, with production of one turbine's magnets linked to significant particulate matter and acidification burdens. Decommissioning adds waste management issues, as composite blades are difficult to recycle and often landfilled, though recycling rates are improving. Wildlife impacts are predominantly from collisions and indirect effects. In the United States, wind facilities cause an estimated 681,000 deaths annually as of 2021, with projections exceeding 1.4 million as capacity grows, affecting like raptors and songbirds; mortality rates vary from 4 to 18 birds per per year depending on site and . Bats face higher relative risks, with fatalities often exceeding deaths at many sites due to from rapid pressure changes near blades, particularly impacting migratory tree-roosting like hoary bats, which comprise a large share of victims. Operational curtailment—slowing or stopping blades during high-risk periods—can reduce bat fatalities by up to 50-70%, but implementation is inconsistent and reduces energy output. Habitat displacement from noise, shadow flicker, and electromagnetic fields further stresses populations, though empirical data on long-term population-level effects remains limited and site-specific. These impacts are mitigated through pre-construction surveys and technologies like ultrasonic deterrents, but critics note that underreporting due to scavenger removal and search inefficiencies may underestimate true tolls.

Economic and Policy Aspects

Viability, Costs, and Subsidies

The economic viability of large-scale wind turbines is constrained by their , which necessitates generation capacity from dispatchable sources such as or to maintain grid reliability. In the United States, the fleet-wide for wind turbines averaged 33.5% in 2023, marking an eight-year low and reflecting variability in wind resources that limits output to about one-third of over time. This intermittency imposes additional costs, including balancing expenses for forecast errors and reserves, estimated at around 2-6 cents per kWh in various analyses, which are often excluded from standard levelized cost of energy (LCOE) calculations. Without affordable, scalable storage—currently adding 50-100% to effective costs—wind cannot reliably replace baseload power, leading critics to argue that its true societal cost exceeds apparent LCOE figures when accounting for redundant . Unsubsidized LCOE for onshore wind in 2024 ranges from approximately $24 to $75 per MWh in favorable U.S. locations, per industry analyses, though recent disruptions and rising material costs have increased benchmarks to $42 per MWh for reference projects. Offshore wind faces higher hurdles, with LCOE estimates climbing to $70-140 per MWh or more due to complex installation, in harsh marine environments, and transmission needs, rendering it uncompetitive without support in most regions. Operation and costs average 1-2 cents per kWh annually, escalating with age as reliability declines after 10-15 years, while decommissioning adds further expenses not fully captured in initial projections. These factors contribute to payback periods of 10-20 years under optimal conditions, but longer in low-wind areas or amid policy shifts. Government subsidies have been essential to deployment, distorting market signals by shielding developers from full costs. In the U.S., the Production Tax Credit (PTC) provides up to 2.6 cents per kWh (inflation-adjusted) for the first 10 years of operation, while the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) offers 30% of ; the 2022 extended these through at least 2025 with adders for domestic content and communities, boosting effective incentives. Federal support for totaled about $65 billion from 2010 to 2023, with PTC and ITC alone exceeding $31 billion in 2024 amid record renewable outlays. Such subsidies, equivalent to 48 times those for oil and gas per unit of produced in some periods, enable deployment but raise taxpayer burdens and grid integration challenges, as subsidized intermittency displaces more reliable sources without equivalent emissions reductions when backups cycle. Globally, similar feed-in tariffs and contracts-for-difference in have supported growth but faced criticism for inflating prices and delaying nuclear or gas alternatives.

Waste Management and Lifecycle Concerns

Wind turbine blades, typically composed of -reinforced polymers (GFRP) or carbon composites, pose significant challenges in due to their durability and resistance to conventional processes. These materials, designed for 20-25 year operational lifespans, result in accumulating decommissioned as early installations reach end-of-life; for instance, global annual blade is projected to exceed 200,000 tonnes starting around 2033. By 2050, worldwide blade could total 43 million tonnes, with accounting for approximately 40% and the facing up to 2.2 million tonnes domestically. Current recycling rates for blades remain low, with many disposed in landfills because mechanical shredding yields low-value fillers (e.g., for or ) that fail to retain original structural properties, rendering economic viability poor without subsidies or mandates. While up to 90% of a turbine's total mass—primarily towers, cables, and foundations—can be recycled using established , blades constitute 5-15% of mass but drive disproportionate disposal issues due to transportation costs and lack of nearby facilities. Emerging methods like or solvolysis show promise for higher-value recovery but face scalability hurdles and higher energy demands, potentially offsetting lifecycle benefits. Lifecycle assessments indicate that end-of-life disposal amplifies environmental impacts, with landfilling or contributing to risks and from non-reusable composites; already accounts for 78% of a 's total impacts, but poor handling could extend this . Decommissioning costs, including removal and disposal, vary by site and scale but average around 500,000−500,000-600,000 per megawatt-scale , often exceeding salvage values without recycled material markets. Policy interventions, such as or bans on landfilling, are increasingly proposed to address these gaps, though implementation lags behind installation growth.

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/windmill
  2. https://www.turito.com/blog/physics/windmill-definition-and-types
  3. https://www.backwoodshome.com/water-pumping-windmills/
  4. https://surfiran.com/mag/who-invented-windmills-a-journey-through-history/
  5. https://www.historyofwindmills.com/windmill-facts/types-of-windmills/
  6. https://ancientengrtech.wisc.edu/the-netherlands-windmill-history-and-why-to-build/
  7. https://thatdamguide.com/how-do-dutch-windmills-work/
  8. https://tringlocalhistory.org.uk/Windmills/Chapter_02.htm
  9. https://www.countryfile.com/go-outdoors/historic-places/what-are-the-different-types-of-windmills-and-how-do-they-work
  10. https://www.iamexpat.nl/lifestyle/lifestyle-news/brief-history-windmills-aka-molens
  11. https://www.treehugger.com/windmill-vs-wind-turbine-5649677
  12. https://science.howstuffworks.com/windmill-vs-wind-turbine.htm
  13. https://todayshomeowner.com/eco-friendly/guides/wind-turbines-vs-windmills/
  14. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/windmill_n
  15. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/english-medieval-windmill
  16. https://wind-works.org/european-traditional-windmills-windmill-liberation/
  17. https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/what-we-do/onshore-wind-energy/history
  18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1179/tns.1930.001
  19. http://ijarse.com/images/fullpdf/1459411397_1047B.pdf
  20. http://www.johnhearfield.com/Wind/Windmills.htm
  21. https://ancientengrtech.wisc.edu/the-netherlands-windmill/
  22. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc724720/m2/1/high_res_d/776935.pdf
  23. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4646&context=grp
  24. http://ee.tlu.edu.vn/Portals/0/2018/NLG/Sach_Tieng_Anh.pdf
  25. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=10
  26. https://www.eia.gov/kids/history-of-energy/timelines/wind.php
  27. https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/nashtifan-windmills
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094114X11001844
  29. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/a02b6y/did_chinese_agriculture_ever_utilize_windmills/
  30. https://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/198001/windmills-from.jiddah.to.yorkshire.htm
  31. https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/6192/
  32. https://www.1001inventions.com/windmills/
  33. https://brewminate.com/windmills-and-their-technology-since-the-middle-ages/
  34. https://www.history.alberta.ca/energyheritage/energy/wind-power/european-use-of-wind-power.aspx
  35. https://www.dutchtrans.co.uk/history-of-the-dutch-windmills/
  36. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17581206.2025.2458583
  37. https://www.holgatewindmill.org/more-information/milling-developments
  38. https://scispace.com/pdf/historical-development-of-the-windmill-mrxuu6ni0n.pdf
  39. https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2009/10/wind-powered-factories-history-and-future-of-industrial-windmills/
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249027067_Technologies_of_a_trading_empire_Dutch_introduction_of_water-_and_windmills_in_early-modern_Asia_1650s-1800
  41. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07341519808581930
  42. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/wind/types-of-wind-turbines.php
  43. https://www.powermag.com/horizontal-or-vertical-the-question-for-wind-turbine-axis-orientation/
  44. https://www.vertogen.eu/wind-turbine-history/
  45. https://familytreemagazine.com/history/history-matters-windmills/
  46. https://www.historyofwindmills.com/windmill-history/tower-mills/
  47. https://www.historyofwindmills.com/windmill-history/smock-mills/
  48. https://www.hiddeneurope.eu/the-magazine/issues/hidden-europe-52/smock-mills/
  49. https://www.ecomena.org/historic-vertical-axis-wind-machines-lessons-for-sustainable-energy/
  50. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/nashtifan-iran-windmills
  51. https://windharvest.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/shepherd.pdf
  52. https://www.historyofwindmills.com/windmill-facts/windmill-sail-types/
  53. https://www.holgatewindmill.org/about-the-mill/parts-of-the-mill
  54. https://tringlocalhistory.org.uk/Windmills/Chapter_03.htm
  55. https://new.millsarchive.org/2019/09/13/technical-descriptions-of-english-windmills/2/
  56. https://new.millsarchive.org/2019/09/13/technical-descriptions-of-english-windmills/32/
  57. https://www.van-vliet.org/dempseywoodworking/dutchwindmill.shtml
  58. https://new.millsarchive.org/2022/03/29/wood-in-millwrighting/
  59. https://burwellmuseum.org.uk/about/mill-works/
  60. https://quaintonwindmill.org/the-windmill/
  61. https://www.illinoiswindmills.org/mill-operation
  62. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/wind/history-of-wind-power.php
  63. https://www.nationalgrid.com/stories/energy-explained/history-wind-energy
  64. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/818/
  65. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/putting-wind-work/10th-grade/
  66. https://study.com/academy/lesson/video/windmills-water-wheels-and-labor-savers-in-the-dark-ages.html
  67. https://global-geography.org/af/Geography/Europe/Netherlands/Special_Information/Netherlands_Windmills
  68. https://tulipfestivalamsterdam.com/the-history-of-the-windmills-of-holland/
  69. https://www.hantsfieldclub.org.uk/publications/hampshirestudies/digital/1990s/vol51/Bowie.pdf
  70. https://www.illinoiswindmills.org/history
  71. http://www.mountaindiscoveries.com/images/ss2011/windmills.pdf
  72. https://research.colonialwilliamsburg.org/Foundation/journal/Autumn02/windmill.cfm
  73. https://tringlocalhistorymuseum.org.uk/morehistory/Windmills/c_chapter_03.htm
  74. https://www.nytimes.com/1973/04/29/archives/in-praise-of-windmills-victims-of-a-world-they-helped-create-free-a.html
  75. https://www.grit.com/tools/windmill-energy-zm0z13mazgou/
  76. https://www.agriculture.com/the-american-windmill-sentinels-of-rural-skies-8702820
  77. https://www.nytimes.com/1972/12/21/archives/prairie-windmills-losing-out-to-efficiency-gas-and-electricity-do.html
  78. https://windexchange.energy.gov/small-wind-guidebook
  79. https://www.alternative-energy-tutorials.com/wind-energy/wind-water-pumping.html
  80. https://culturetrekking.com/windmills-of-the-netherlands/
  81. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/world/europe/22windmills.html
  82. https://www.celebritycruises.com/blog/amsterdam-windmills
  83. https://www.coe.int/en/web/culture-and-heritage/-/restoration-of-lasithi-plateau-s-windmills-with-perforated-sails
  84. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPBt1QCjYog
  85. https://muzeologia.sk/index_htm_files/MKD_3_24_tomaszewski.pdf
  86. https://www.cultureelerfgoed.nl/binaries/cultureelerfgoed/documenten/publicaties/2012/01/01/a-future-for-mills/A-future-for-mills.pdf
  87. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/renewables/wind
  88. https://www.irena.org/Energy-Transition/Technology/Wind-energy
  89. https://www.gwec.net/gwec-news/wind-turbine-suppliers-deliver-new-record-volume-despite-difficult-year-full-of-diverse-challenges
  90. https://wwindea.org/GlobalStatistics
  91. https://doggerbank.com/
  92. https://www.statista.com/statistics/947547/largest-global-wind-power-projects/
  93. https://css.umich.edu/publications/factsheets/energy/wind-energy-factsheet
  94. https://www.statkraft.com/newsroom/explained/mythbusting-wind-power-is-unreliable-inefficient-and-harmful-to-nature/
  95. https://thundersaidenergy.com/downloads/wind-turbine-capacity-factors/
  96. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61943
  97. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2023-08/land-based-wind-market-report-2023-edition.pdf
  98. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-44232-9
  99. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/08/15/fact-check-false-claim-wind-turbine-generators-only-last-3-4-years/10243903002/
  100. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/we.2907
  101. https://grd.nrel.gov/stats
  102. https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/articles/statistics-show-bearing-problems-cause-majority-wind-turbine-gearbox-failures
  103. https://zipdo.co/wind-turbine-failure-statistics/
  104. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1028916
  105. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/6287639/8948470/08952713.pdf
  106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025010011
  107. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/eprg-wp2503.pdf
  108. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01956574251366203
  109. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435124005130
  110. https://www.ucs.org/resources/environmental-impacts-wind-power
  111. https://journalistsresource.org/environment/lifecycle-greenhouse-gas-emissions-solar-wind-energy/
  112. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/wind/wind-energy-and-the-environment.php
  113. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969722021155
  114. https://www.tuscaloosanews.com/story/opinion/columns/2023/04/08/wind-power-comes-with-environmental-costs-hazards-ecoviews/70074099007/
  115. https://seas.harvard.edu/news/2018/10/large-scale-wind-power-would-require-more-land-and-cause-more-environmental-impact
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8929459/
  117. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624020262
  118. https://abcbirds.org/program/wind-energy-and-birds/challenges/
  119. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/how-are-bats-affected-wind-turbines
  120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7454995/
  121. https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jwmg.21844
  122. https://windexchange.energy.gov/projects/wildlife
  123. https://www.fws.gov/node/266177
  124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724000351
  125. https://www.resources.org/common-resources/what-are-costs-and-values-wind-and-solar-power-how-are-they-changing/
  126. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323006989
  127. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy25osti/91775.pdf
  128. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/2433785
  129. https://www.epa.gov/green-power-markets/summary-inflation-reduction-act-provisions-related-renewable-energy
  130. https://www.texaspolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/2024-10-LP-Federal-Energy-Subsidies-BrentBennett_FINAL-1.pdf
  131. https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/renewable-energy-received-record-subsidies-in-2024/
  132. https://www.texaspolicyresearch.com/federal-energy-subsidies-distort-the-market-and-impact-texas-a-closer-look-at-the-true-costs/
  133. https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/regulation/wind-and-solar-energy-subsidies-vs-oil-and-gas-tax-deductions/
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652624040770
  135. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125000917
  136. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316556892_Wind_turbine_blade_waste_in_2050
  137. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1765605
  138. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10108337/
  139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135983682400101X
  140. https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/america-can-recycle-90-wind-turbine-mass-according-new-doe-report
  141. https://cleanpower.org/gateway.php?file=2023/01/ACP_BladeRecycling_WhitePaper_230130.pdf
  142. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005998
  143. https://www.ourenergypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/turbines.pdf
  144. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/1dede7e2-c880-40c4-8e38-a4b9cb651adf-MECA.pdf?abstractid=5615868&mirid=1
  145. https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/wind/the-cost-of-decommissioning-wind-turbines-is-huge/
  146. https://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId=%257BFD4DB273-C38B-463D-872D-77B08B19CE9C%257D
  147. https://climate.ny.gov/-/media/Project/Climate/Files/2022-Comments/ramireztejeda2016-bladedisposal.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.