Hubbry Logo
Chekannur MaulaviChekannur MaulaviMain
Open search
Chekannur Maulavi
Community hub
Chekannur Maulavi
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chekannur Maulavi
Chekannur Maulavi
Chekannur Maulavi
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

P. K. Mohammed Abduhassan Maulavi or Chekannur Maulavi (born 1936) was an Indian modern Islamicist from Chekannur, Malappuram district of Kerala, India.[1] He is the founder of the Quran Sunnath Society.[2] He disappeared on 29 July 1993. His death is uncertain.[3]

Key Information

Disappearance and investigation

[edit]

The CBI took over the case in 1996, and in 2000 arrested two members of the ultra orthodox Muslim sect under suspicion of murder.[4][5][6]

The case was hampered by the disappearance of several witnesses, whose property was seized when they fled abroad rather than appear to testify in 2008.[7]

Mohammed’s wife filed a petition seeking to arraign A.P. Aboobacker Musaliyar as a murder suspect through her lawyer, Advocate S.K. Premraj which was allowed.[5] The court had found that Mohammed’s body was disposed of in some mysterious manner so as never to be recovered,[8] which was dismissed by High Court later[3][9]

A Decision Bench of the Kerala High Court in 2018 acquitted the first accused.[10] With this, all accused in the case, including the first accused V. V. Hamsa, who had been sentenced to two terms of life imprisonment in 2010 have been let off.[9][11] Even Chekannur Moulavi's death could not be proved.[10]

[edit]

His disappearance is the subject of a 2009 documentary, Ore Oru Chekannur.[12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chekannur Maulavi

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Chekannur Maulavi (born P. K. Mohammed Abul Hassan; 1936 – disappeared July 29, 1993) was an Indian Islamic scholar and reformer from Edappal in Kerala's , noted for his advocacy of -centric interpretations that prioritized scriptural reasoning over established hadiths and orthodox customs. He founded the Quran Sunnath Society to propagate these views, which included challenging traditions like reliance on Bukhari collections and promoting social reforms within Muslim communities, authoring eighteen books including a partial translation. Maulavi's teachings emphasized empirical scrutiny of religious texts and rejection of practices lacking direct Quranic basis, positioning him as a modernist figure who critiqued institutional orthodoxies in ’s Muslim landscape. His later enabled innovations such as female-led prayers, exemplified by member Jamitha Teacher becoming India's first woman in 2018. These positions drew sharp opposition from fundamentalist elements, who viewed his reforms as threats to established authority, culminating in his abduction from home under pretext of a , after which he was never seen again. The investigation, transferred to the CBI in 1996, led to arrests of suspects linked to ultra-orthodox sects, with a special court convicting one in 2010 on of and body disposal, but the acquitted in 2018, citing absence of proof of death or direct involvement, rendering the case unresolved despite presumptions of Islamist-motivated elimination. Maulavi's legacy persists through splintered society factions continuing his rationalist approach amid ongoing debates over Islamic reform in .

Early Life and Background

Birth and Family Origins

P. K. Mohammed, widely known as Chekannur Maulavi, was born in 1936 in Chekannur, a village within Edappal panchayat in , , . He belonged to a modest Muslim family native to the Malabar region, where Islamic traditions had taken root among Mappila communities since medieval times through trade and conversions. His father, Abdullakutty, and mother, Fathima, provided a conventional religious upbringing in this rural setting, characterized by adherence to local Sunni practices prevalent in northern . Little is documented about extended family lineage or socioeconomic status beyond this agrarian context, though such backgrounds typically involved small-scale farming or trade alongside mosque-centered community life.

Initial Religious Education

Chekannur Maulavi, born P. K. Mohammed Abul Hassan in 1936, received traditional instruction in Islamic thought from childhood in northern . His initial formal studies focused on language and Islamic theology, conducted during his younger years at local madrasas, including Baqiyathu Swalihath in Vellor. By age 24, he had qualified as a religious (maulavi), reflecting completion of foundational religious training common in Kerala's Arabic college system. This early education emphasized of Quranic texts, basic (jurisprudence), and , typical of introductory curricula in Malabar, though Maulavi later critiqued such approaches for overreliance on secondary traditions.

Scholarly Development and Career

Formation of Reformist Ideas

Chekannur Maulavi's reformist ideas developed through rigorous personal study of Islamic primary sources, leading him to prioritize the as the unaltered and sufficient basis for faith and practice while scrutinizing for potential post-prophetic alterations. He contended that Hadith compilations contained interpolations introduced after the time of the Prophet Muhammad and the caliphs—, , , and —undermining their reliability when they conflicted with Quranic directives or rational inquiry. This perspective arose from his engagement as a scholar steeped in traditional , where he identified discrepancies between early Islamic purity and later accretions of custom and clerical interpretation. By the 1980s, Maulavi had formalized these views into a systematic , publishing Islamika Shariathum Inidian Shariathum in 1985, which reinterpreted principles through a strictly Quranic lens adapted to contemporary Indian legal contexts, such as supporting women's maintenance rights in line with the 1985 Shah Bano ruling. His methodology emphasized direct, unmediated Quranic over (blind adherence to precedent), rejecting Hadith-centric practices like certain prayers or gender norms not explicitly Quranic. This evolution reflected not external ideological imports but an internal drive to restore what he saw as authentic, egalitarian free from and authoritarian overlays. Maulavi's ideas gained traction through participation in public debates against Sunni traditionalists and Mujahid reformists in Malabar during the late , where he defended -only sufficiency (Ahlul Quran principles) against accusations of innovation. Key texts like Pramanayogyamaya Hadisethu? (1993), questioning authenticity, marked the maturation of his thought, positioning him as a challenger to clerical monopoly and advocate for rational, evidence-based faith. These writings and discourses, produced amid rising fundamentalist tensions in , underscored his commitment to purging unverified traditions to align with modern ethical demands.

Establishment of Khur-aan Sunnath Society

Chekannur Maulavi established the Khur-aan Sunnath Society as a platform to disseminate his reformist interpretations of , prioritizing the 's direct teachings and authentic while critiquing accretions from later traditions and clerical intermediaries. The society aimed at fostering a community dedicated to the "faithful and correct implementation of the ," challenging prevailing orthodox practices that Maulavi viewed as deviations from scriptural primacy. Through the society, Maulavi organized study circles, publications, and public discourses to encourage independent Quranic among adherents, positioning it as an alternative to dominant institutional madrasas and mosque committees in . Initial efforts focused on educating lay Muslims in rural northern , where Maulavi resided, drawing small but committed followings who rejected rituals and rulings not explicitly grounded in the . The organization's formation reflected Maulavi's broader scholarly evolution toward scriptural purism, amid growing tensions with traditionalist factions over issues like inheritance laws and gender roles derived solely from Quranic verses.

Key Religious Views and Reforms

Emphasis on Quranic Primacy

Chekannur Maulavi maintained that the constitutes the sole infallible revelation from , serving as the complete and self-sufficient guide for Islamic belief and practice, with no need for supplementary texts like collections. He argued that Hadiths, compiled centuries after the Prophet Muhammad's death, were often interpolated or fabricated, introducing contradictions to the 's core principles and enabling clerical control over the faithful. This stance positioned the not merely as a foundational text but as dynamically adaptable to societal evolution, capable of addressing contemporary needs without rigid adherence to post-Quranic traditions. In applying this Quranic primacy, Maulavi reinterpreted core rituals directly from the text, rejecting -derived elaborations. For instance, he derived a requirement for three daily prayers from approximately 16 Quranic verses referencing morning, evening, and night timings, dismissing the conventional five prayers and the muezzin's as innovations absent from the . Similarly, he critiqued ritualized , advocating exemptions for the elderly, invalids, and children as aligned with Quranic mercy, rather than enforcing universal observance per norms. On , he condemned practices disinheriting orphaned grandchildren as anti-Quranic, publicly offering 100,000 rupees to anyone who could prove such exclusions scriptural, while interpreting the to grant equal shares to sons and daughters without gender discrimination. Maulavi's Quran-centric approach extended to broader social reforms, such as endorsing for divorced women in line with the 1985 Shah Bano Supreme Court ruling, which he grounded in Quranic provisions for equity rather than secular law. He envisioned a priestless Islamic community, free from intermediary clerical authority that perpetuated Hadith-based dogmas, asserting that the Quran's clarity empowered direct individual engagement with divine guidance. Through these views, he sought to purge Islam of accretions that he believed distorted its original purity, prioritizing empirical fidelity to the text over (imitation of predecessors).

Critiques of Hadith and Clerical Authority

Chekannur Maulavi advocated a strict Quranic primacy, positing the as the sole authentic source of Islamic doctrine and practice while rejecting collections as secondary and unreliable. In works such as Bhukariyum Muslimum Lokapollanmaranelathinulla Thelivu (1992) and Pramanayogyamaya Hadisethu? (1993), he systematically challenged the authenticity of prominent compilations like , arguing that they lacked verifiable chains of transmission and often contradicted Quranic principles. He particularly targeted narrations attributed to Abu Hurairah, a prolific reporter, claiming these introduced post-prophetic corruptions influenced by the narrator's background as a recent convert from , thereby undermining the purity of prophetic tradition. Maulavi applied this critique to core rituals, contending that practices like the five daily s, the muezzin's call (), and ritual fasting exemptions were Hadith interpolations absent from the . For instance, he interpreted Quranic verses (e.g., 16 references to timings) as prescribing only three daily prayers—morning, evening, and night—dismissing the fifth as a Judaistic addition via Hadith, and opposed loud congregational s that disturb others, citing 17:110. In Khuranil Namaskarathinula Sthanam (1992) and Khuranile Namaskara Roopam (1993), he rederived forms exclusively from Quranic text, rejecting Hadith-derived elaborations like specific postures or timings not explicitly stated therein. These arguments extended to (alms) rules and laws, where he highlighted discrepancies between Hadith-based customs and Quranic directives, offering a reward of ₹100,000 in 1991 to substantiate any alignment of prevailing practices with the alone. By elevating individual Quranic interpretation over Hadith-dependent scholarship, Maulavi's positions directly eroded clerical authority, portraying traditional ulema as intermediaries who obscured direct access to divine guidance. He promoted a "priestless" reformist through the , founded in the late 1980s with 27 units by the early 1990s, and critiqued orthodox groups in Khuran Virudha Baankkum Jamaathum (1993) for prioritizing over , which he saw as fostering division and misuse of funds (e.g., Gulf remittances for mosques rather than ). This stance implicitly accused clerics of perpetuating un-Quranic innovations, urging believers to bypass interpretive hierarchies for personal textual engagement, a view disseminated via 17 books published between 1985 and 1993 and the society's journal Al Buhran.

Opposition from Orthodox Factions

Ideological Clashes with Traditionalists

Chekannur Maulavi's advocacy for Quranic primacy directly conflicted with the traditionalist emphasis on Hadith as an authoritative source alongside the Quran, a cornerstone of Sunni orthodoxy in Kerala. He publicly questioned the authenticity of major Hadith collections, such as Sahih Bukhari, alleging fabrication and attributing much of their content to a conspiracy involving Abu Huraira, whom he described as a Yemeni Jew influencing post-Prophetic traditions. Traditionalist scholars, reliant on these texts for jurisprudence and ritual, viewed such critiques as undermining established Islamic scholarship, leading to widespread condemnation of Maulavi's positions as deviations from Ahlul Sunnah wal Jama'ah norms. A prominent flashpoint arose over rituals, where Maulavi argued that the prescribes only three daily prayers, rejecting the five established by Hadith-based traditions as later interpolations. He opposed practices like the muezzin's and the use of loudspeakers for , citing Quranic verse 17:110 as prohibiting disturbances to non-Muslims, and challenged ritualized fasting during Ramadan for the elderly, invalids, and children as un-Quranic impositions. Orthodox factions, including dominant Sunni groups, defended these as integral to derived from Prophetic , interpreting Maulavi's reforms as an assault on communal identity and devotional continuity upheld for centuries. To underscore his stance, Maulavi offered a ₹100,000 reward in the early for verifiable Quranic supporting prevailing laws that disinherited orphaned grandchildren, further escalating tensions by framing traditional rules as "anti-Quranic." Maulavi's support for the 1985 Shah Bano judgment exemplified clashes on and maintenance rights, where he endorsed Quranic principles of over limited Hadith-derived maintenance, aligning with judicial against uniform personal law demands. Sunni traditionalists, who mobilized against the verdict to preserve exclusivity, saw this as capitulation to non-Islamic influences, intensifying ideological rifts within Kerala's Muslim community. He also critiqued clerical authority, decrying the emergence of "Ammavis" (priests) as a Hadith-fueled deviation from the Quran's vision of a priestless faith, and accused ulema of prioritizing construction over while concealing Quranic truths for personal gain. These positions provoked strong backlash from orthodox leaders, who ridiculed him publicly but often avoided direct scholarly debates, fostering a climate of rivalry documented in later investigations as a motive for .

Reports of Threats and Intimidation

Chekannur Maulavi's advocacy for Quran-only interpretations of , rejecting authenticity and critiquing clerical intermediaries, provoked intense backlash from orthodox Sunni factions in , including traditionalist groups linked to figures like Kanthapuram A. P. Abdulla Koya Madani. This opposition created an environment of hostility, with public denunciations framing his views as heretical deviations from established Islamic practices. A (CBI) court judgment in the case of his disappearance explicitly noted that "some fundamentalist Muslim individuals could not tolerate the so-called progressive ideas of Chekannur Maulavi," underscoring the depth of antagonism from ultra-orthodox elements who viewed his reforms as a direct to their interpretive authority. Strong reactions to his publications, such as Namaskaram - How, When, Why (1988) and Succession Law in (July 1991), and his establishment of the Sunnath with 27 units, further fueled this resistance, though specific documented incidents of direct threats remain limited in public records. While no verified fatwas or explicit death threats against Maulavi are detailed in primary sources, the cumulative ideological clashes contributed to reports of within reformist circles, including pressures on his followers and disruptions to his teaching activities in the late 1980s and early 1990s. This tension reflected broader resistance to challenges against Hadith-dependent customs and priestly control over funds and .

Disappearance

Circumstances of July 29, 1993

On July 29, 1993, Chekannur Maulavi, residing in Edappal, , , was last seen leaving his home in the evening. According to his wife, Hauwwah Umma, Maulavi departed after receiving an invitation from two unidentified individuals to deliver a speech or attend a study session. He was accompanied by persons including P.V. Hamza, who had visited the residence earlier that day, and the group left in a . No further sightings of Maulavi occurred after this departure, marking the onset of his disappearance, with initial reports filed by family members noting his absence without immediate alarm due to the stated purpose of his exit. Subsequent investigations by local police and later the (CBI) treated the events as an abduction from the home, though no body was recovered and direct eyewitness accounts beyond family testimony remained limited.

Immediate Aftermath and Family Response

His wife, Havva Umma, and uncle, Salim Haji, promptly filed a police complaint reporting the disappearance after Maulavi failed to return home following his departure on , 1993, with two unidentified men who had arrived in a claiming to escort him for a religious . This action initiated a local police investigation into the circumstances, noting the unusual nature of the invitation and Maulavi's prior receipt of threats from conservative Islamic factions opposed to his reformist teachings. The family's response underscored suspicions of foul play, with later testifying that Maulavi had expressed unease about similar unsolicited calls but proceeded out of scholarly obligation. Immediate media coverage amplified the case, highlighting Maulavi's prominence and the potential involvement of hardline elements, though initial probes yielded no leads on his whereabouts.

Investigation and Judicial Proceedings

CBI Takeover and Early Probes

The (CBI) assumed control of the Chekannur Maulavi disappearance case in 1996, following a order prompted by a from his wife, Hawa Umma, who sought a more thorough probe amid dissatisfaction with prior efforts. Prior local investigations by police and the Kerala crime branch had yielded no breakthroughs since Maulavi's abduction from his Edappal home on July 29, 1993, classifying it initially as a report without establishing foul play. Upon takeover, the CBI re-examined forensic evidence, witness statements, and circumstantial leads, determining by 1998 that Maulavi had been abducted and murdered in a linked to orthodox Muslim factions opposed to his reformist interpretations emphasizing Quranic primacy over certain traditions. The agency focused on ideological motives, tracing threats from traditionalist groups, including the Kanthapuram faction of , and alleged that the body was disposed of to conceal the crime. Early CBI actions included summoning key figures from suspect sects and building a case against individuals involved in the abduction, such as P.V. Hamsa and accomplice Muhammed Basheer, though like the body remained absent, complicating prosecutions. By 2000, the CBI arrested two members of an ultra-orthodox group affiliated with for suspected roles in the murder, expanding charges to nine accused overall, including under IPC sections 120B, 302, 364, and 201. These probes highlighted witness reluctance and potential , hampering progress, with the investigation hampered by the absence of physical remains and reliance on and evidence.

Arrests, Trials, and Acquittals

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which took over the probe into Chekannur Maulavi's 1993 disappearance, filed a chargesheet in 2002 against nine individuals suspected of involvement in his abduction and presumed murder, including prime accused P.V. Hamza, a local Muslim Youth League leader. The accused were apprehended based on witness statements alleging motives tied to ideological opposition from orthodox Islamic groups, though no body was recovered to confirm death. In a CBI special court trial concluding on September 29, 2010, P.V. was convicted of and abduction under relevant sections of the , receiving a double sentence; the court acquitted the remaining eight accused—P.K. Saifudheen, Muhammed Basheer, Muhammed Kutty, Kunhi , Abdul Gafoor, Abdussalam, Usman, and another Hamsa—citing insufficient evidence linking them to the crime. The verdict relied on , including confessions later retracted and forensic inconsistencies, but proceeded without physical proof of Maulavi's demise. On October 15, 2018, the overturned Hamza's conviction in a detailed judgment, acquitting him due to the prosecution's failure to establish —no body, no of death, and unreliable testimonies undermined by delays and contradictions. The court noted the case exemplified prosecutions hinging on rather than verifiable facts, effectively closing judicial proceedings without any convictions standing. No further appeals or reinvestigations have resulted in charges against others.

Legacy and Broader Impact

Influence on Islamic Reform in Kerala

Chekannur Maulavi founded the Quran Sunnath Society in , establishing 27 units across the region to promote a strictly -centric interpretation of , rejecting collections as human interpolations lacking divine authority. His teachings emphasized the as the sole authoritative source for religious practice, leading him to challenge entrenched customs such as the five daily prayers (advocating three based on Quranic verses), ritual for the elderly, invalids, and children, and the use of loudspeakers for the call to prayer. Through public meetings organized since the and publications including 17 books and the journal Al Buhran, he critiqued priestly control over laws—offering a reward of ₹100,000 to any scholar proving current practices aligned with the —and opposed lavish constructions funded by Gulf remittances in favor of and charity. As a leader in the Ahlul Quran movement in Malabar, Maulavi engaged in textual and oral debates with traditional Sunni and Mujahid groups, contesting their reliance on through works like Islamika Shariathum Inidian Shariathum (1985), which redefined rituals such as prayer and to align exclusively with ic injunctions. He supported social equity measures grounded in scripture, including for divorced women as per his interpretation of Quranic principles, endorsing the 1985 Shah Bano judgment against orthodox opposition. His emphasis on good deeds over mere faith as the criterion for salvation further positioned his views as a direct challenge to Hadith-based orthodoxy, fostering intra-community discourse on authentic while advocating rational inquiry over unquestioned traditions. Maulavi's disappearance on July 29, 1993—widely attributed to fundamentalist retaliation—served as a stark indicator of resistance to reformist currents within , yet his society's persistence underscored the enduring appeal of Quran-only approaches amid broader trends. Though numerically limited compared to Sunni factions, his followers continued advocating progressive stances, including innovations like female-led Friday prayers, which marked a departure from gender norms in traditional Kerala Muslim practice. This legacy contributed to a niche but vocal reformist strand, highlighting tensions between scriptural and customary authority, even as threats against the society persisted into the .

Cultural Representations and Commemorations

Annual commemorations of Chekannur Maulavi's disappearance occur each July 29, organized by his family, the Qur'an Sunnath Society he founded, and progressive Muslim groups in , often featuring memorial speeches, seminars, and protests against religious extremism. These events emphasize his advocacy for Quran-centric reform and critique of traditionalist practices, drawing participants from reformist circles to discuss ongoing challenges to rationalist interpretations of . In 2019, marking the 26th anniversary, multiple organizations in held distinct gatherings, including public meetings at venues like the city corporation ground, where speakers addressed the unresolved case and Maulavi's influence on countering within Kerala's Muslim community. Similar observances continued annually, such as the 31st commemoration in 2024, underscoring persistent demands for and his symbolic role in resisting conservative dominance. Cultural depictions include the 2009 Malayalam documentary Ore Oru Chekannur, which explores his life, reformist teachings, and the circumstances of his 1993 vanishing, produced to highlight the tensions between progressive and traditionalist Islamic factions in .

References

  1. https://www.newageislam.com/the-war-islam/m-sathyavathi/keralas-islamic-fundamentalists-tolerate-progressive-chekannur-maulavi/d/3621
  2. https://swarajyamag.com/insta/without-hinduism-secularism-wont-survive-kerala-muslim-woman-who-made-history-by-leading-friday-prayers
  3. https://www.onmanorama.com/news/kerala/2018/10/15/chekannur-moulavi-case-prime-accused-acquitted.html
  4. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/chekannur-moulavi-case-accused-let-off/article25231374.ece
  5. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2018/Oct/15/kerala-hc-acquits-prime-accused-in-chekannur-maulavi-case-1885853.html
  6. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/kozhikode/separate-events-to-mark-chekannurs-disappearance/article28743767.ece
  7. https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/8729431
  8. https://persecution.exmuslims.org/cases/progressive-cleric-chekannur-moulavi-abducted-and-murdered-by-islamists
  9. https://members.tripod.com/signs_magazines/issue4/profile_chekannur_moulavi.htm
  10. https://www.veethi.com/india-people/chekannur_maulavi-profile-7714-20.htm
  11. https://www.academia.edu/113799382/Contesting_authentic_Islam_Ahlul_Quran_movements_and_performance_of_debates_in_the_religious_sphere_of_Kerala
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-asian-studies/article/islamic-traditionalism-in-a-globalizing-world-sunni-muslim-identity-in-kerala-south-india/244E92AD4C35A466FF52AF02F6329F24
  13. https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/IND_HC_KLHC010735102008
  14. https://www.catchnews.com/life-society-news/jamida-beevi-s-prayer-a-cry-in-the-wilderness-97780.html
  15. https://www.theweek.in/theweek/statescan/2023/03/25/a-women-s-movement-in-kerala-against-muslim-inheritance-law.html
  16. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/jibber-jabber/quran-has-capacity-to-reflect-and-absorb-changes-in-society-over-time-it-did-not-discriminate-between-men-and-women/
  17. https://www.islamweb.net/en/fatwa/185295/false-allegations-about-abu-hurayrah-al-bukhari-and-muslim
  18. https://www.newsbharati.com/Encyc/2017/11/1/Kerala-Islamic-scholars-hail-Saudi-King-s-move-to-scrutinize-Hadiths.html
  19. https://keralakaumudi.com/en/news/mobile/news.php?id=3495&u=hc-acquits-prime-accused-in-chekannur-maulavi-murder-case-pv-hamza-3495
  20. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/31535465/
  21. https://twocircles.net/2007jul29/kerala_moulavis_murderers_large_even_after_14_years.html
  22. https://madhyamamonline.com/editorial/2018/oct/17/sad-fate-chekannur-case
  23. https://www.livelaw.in/this-is-an-instance-where-there-is-no-proof-that-moulavi-had-died-kerala-hc-acquits-accused-in-chekannur-maulavi-murder-case-read-judgment
  24. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/chekannur-moulavi-case-prime-accused-let-off/articleshow/66228550.cms
  25. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/Maulavi-case-accused-gets-double-life-imprisonment/article16052890.ece
  26. https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/suspect-found-guilty-in-murder-of-kerala-islamic-cleric-1.689402
  27. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/Chekannur-Moulavicourt-convicts-one-accused/article16051901.ece
  28. https://organiser.org/2005/08/14/30072/general/rd176b571/
  29. https://en.bharatpedia.org/wiki/Chekannur_Maulavi
  30. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2010/Sep/30/first-accused-guilty-in-chekannur-moulavi-case-191286.html
  31. https://www.latestlaws.com/adr/human-rights-news/kerala-hc-acquits-prime-accused-in-25-year-old-case-of-chekannur-maulavi-disappearance/
  32. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/161018/moulavi-case-accused-let-off.html
  33. https://www.news18.com/news/india/chekannur-moulavi-murder-accused-let-off-by-kerala-high-court-1909407.html
  34. https://twocircles.net/2010sep29/chekannur_moulvi_murder_case_prime_accused_convicted.html
  35. https://www.newageislam.com/radical-islamism-jihad/tufail-ahmad-new-age-islam/the-roots-islamic-radicalisation-kerala/d/108722
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.