Hubbry Logo
Yield (chemistry)Yield (chemistry)Main
Open search
Yield (chemistry)
Community hub
Yield (chemistry)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Yield (chemistry)
Yield (chemistry)
Yield (chemistry)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In chemistry, yield, also known as reaction yield or chemical yield, refers to the amount of product obtained in a chemical reaction.[1] Yield is one of the primary factors that scientists must consider in organic and inorganic chemical synthesis processes.[2] In chemical reaction engineering, "yield", "conversion" and "selectivity" are terms used to describe ratios of how much of a reactant was consumed (conversion), how much desired product was formed (yield) in relation to the undesired product (selectivity), represented as X, Y, and S.

The term yield also plays an important role in analytical chemistry, as individual compounds are recovered in purification processes in a range from quantitative yield (100 %) to low yield (< 50 %).

Definitions

[edit]
Relation between chemical reaction conversion selectivity and yield

In chemical reaction engineering, "yield", "conversion" and "selectivity" are terms used to describe ratios of how much of a reactant has reacted—conversion, how much of a desired product was formed—yield, and how much desired product was formed in ratio to the undesired product—selectivity, represented as X, S, and Y.

According to the Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering manual, yield refers to the amount of a specific product formed per mole of reactant consumed.[3] In chemistry, mole is used to describe quantities of reactants and products in chemical reactions.

The Compendium of Chemical Terminology defined yield as the "ratio expressing the efficiency of a mass conversion process. The yield coefficient is defined as the amount of cell mass (kg) or product formed (kg,mol)[Notes 1] related to the consumed substrate (carbon or nitrogen source or oxygen in kg or moles) or to the intracellular ATP production (moles)."[4][5]: 168 

In the section "Calculations of yields in the monitoring of reactions" in the 1996 4th edition of Vogel's Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry (1978), the authors write that, "theoretical yield in an organic reaction is the weight of product which would be obtained if the reaction has proceeded to completion according to the chemical equation. The yield is the weight of the pure product which is isolated from the reaction."[1]: 33  [Notes 2] In 'the 1996 edition of Vogel's Textbook, percentage yield is expressed as,[1]: 33 [Notes 3]

According to the 1996 edition of Vogel's Textbook, yields close to 100% are called quantitative, yields above 90% are called excellent, yields above 80% are very good, yields above 70% are good, yields above 50% are fair, and yields below 40% are called poor.[1]: 33  In their 2002 publication, Petrucci, Harwood, and Herring wrote that Vogel's Textbook names were arbitrary, and not universally accepted, and depending on the nature of the reaction in question, these expectations may be unrealistically high. Yields may appear to be 100% or above when products are impure, as the measured weight of the product will include the weight of any impurities.[6]: 125 

In their 2016 laboratory manual, Experimental Organic Chemistry, the authors described the "reaction yield" or "absolute yield" of a chemical reaction as the "amount of pure and dry product yielded in a reaction".[7] They wrote that knowing the stoichiometry of a chemical reaction—the numbers and types of atoms in the reactants and products, in a balanced equation "make it possible to compare different elements through stoichiometric factors."[7] Ratios obtained by these quantitative relationships are useful in data analysis.[7]

Theoretical, actual, and percent yields

[edit]

The percent yield is a comparison between the actual yield—which is the weight of the intended product of a chemical reaction in a laboratory setting—and the theoretical yield—the measurement of pure intended isolated product, based on the chemical equation of a flawless chemical reaction,[1] and is defined as,

The ideal relationship between products and reactants in a chemical reaction can be obtained by using a chemical reaction equation. Stoichiometry is used to run calculations about chemical reactions, for example, the stoichiometric mole ratio between reactants and products. The stoichiometry of a chemical reaction is based on chemical formulas and equations that provide the quantitative relation between the number of moles of various products and reactants, including yields.[8] Stoichiometric equations are used to determine the limiting reagent or reactant—the reactant that is completely consumed in a reaction. The limiting reagent determines the theoretical yield—the relative quantity of moles of reactants and the product formed in a chemical reaction. Other reactants are said to be present in excess. The actual yield—the quantity physically obtained from a chemical reaction conducted in a laboratory—is often less than the theoretical yield.[8] The theoretical yield is what would be obtained if all of the limiting reagent reacted to give the product in question. A more accurate yield is measured based on how much product was actually produced versus how much could be produced. The ratio of the theoretical yield and the actual yield results in a percent yield.[8]

When more than one reactant participates in a reaction, the yield is usually calculated based on the amount of the limiting reactant, whose amount is less than stoichiometrically equivalent (or just equivalent) to the amounts of all other reactants present. Other reagents present in amounts greater than required to react with all the limiting reagent present are considered excess. As a result, the yield should not be automatically taken as a measure for reaction efficiency.[citation needed]

In their 1992 publication General Chemistry, Whitten, Gailey, and Davis described the theoretical yield as the amount predicted by a stoichiometric calculation based on the number of moles of all reactants present. This calculation assumes that only one reaction occurs and that the limiting reactant reacts completely.[9]

According to Whitten, the actual yield is always smaller (the percent yield is less than 100%), often very much so, for several reasons.[9]: 95  As a result, many reactions are incomplete and the reactants are not completely converted to products. If a reverse reaction occurs, the final state contains both reactants and products in a state of chemical equilibrium. Two or more reactions may occur simultaneously, so that some reactant is converted to undesired side products. Losses occur in the separation and purification of the desired product from the reaction mixture. Impurities are present in the starting material which do not react to give desired product.[9]

Example

[edit]

This is an example of an esterification reaction where one molecule acetic acid (also called ethanoic acid) reacts with one molecule ethanol, yielding one molecule ethyl acetate (a bimolecular second-order reaction of the type A + B → C):

120 g acetic acid (60 g/mol, 2.0 mol) was reacted with 230 g ethanol (46 g/mol, 5.0 mol), yielding 132 g ethyl acetate (88 g/mol, 1.5 mol). The yield was 75%.
  1. The molar amount of the reactants is calculated from the weights (acetic acid: 120 g ÷ 60 g/mol = 2.0 mol; ethanol: 230 g ÷ 46 g/mol = 5.0 mol).
  2. Ethanol is used in a 2.5-fold excess (5.0 mol ÷ 2.0 mol).
  3. The theoretical molar yield is 2.0 mol (the molar amount of the limiting compound, acetic acid).
  4. The molar yield of the product is calculated from its weight (132 g ÷ 88 g/mol = 1.5 mol).
  5. The % yield is calculated from the actual molar yield and the theoretical molar yield (1.5 mol ÷ 2.0 mol × 100% = 75%).[citation needed]

Purification of products

[edit]

In his 2016 Handbook of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Michael Pirrung wrote that yield is one of the primary factors synthetic chemists must consider in evaluating a synthetic method or a particular transformation in "multistep syntheses."[10]: 163  He wrote that a yield based on recovered starting material (BRSM) or (BORSM) does not provide the theoretical yield or the "100% of the amount of product calculated", that is necessary in order to take the next step in the multistep systhesis.: 163 

Purification steps always lower the yield, through losses incurred during the transfer of material between reaction vessels and purification apparatus or imperfect separation of the product from impurities, which may necessitate the discarding of fractions deemed insufficiently pure. The yield of the product measured after purification (typically to >95% spectroscopic purity, or to sufficient purity to pass combustion analysis) is called the isolated yield of the reaction.[citation needed]

Internal standard yield

[edit]

Yields can also be calculated by measuring the amount of product formed (typically in the crude, unpurified reaction mixture) relative to a known amount of an added internal standard, using techniques like Gas chromatography (GC), High-performance liquid chromatography, or Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR spectroscopy) or magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).[citation needed] A yield determined using this approach is known as an internal standard yield. Yields are typically obtained in this manner to accurately determine the quantity of product produced by a reaction, irrespective of potential isolation problems. Additionally, they can be useful when isolation of the product is challenging or tedious, or when the rapid determination of an approximate yield is desired. Unless otherwise indicated, yields reported in the synthetic organic and inorganic chemistry literature refer to isolated yields, which better reflect the amount of pure product one is likely to obtain under the reported conditions, upon repeating the experimental procedure.[citation needed]

Reporting of yields

[edit]

In their 2010 Synlett article, Martina Wernerova and organic chemist, Tomáš Hudlický, raised concerns about inaccurate reporting of yields, and offered solutions—including the proper characterization of compounds.[11] After performing careful control experiments, Wernerova and Hudlický said that each physical manipulation (including extraction/washing, drying over desiccant, filtration, and column chromatography) results in a loss of yield of about 2%. Thus, isolated yields measured after standard aqueous workup and chromatographic purification should seldom exceed 94%.[11] They called this phenomenon "yield inflation" and said that yield inflation had gradually crept upward in recent decades in chemistry literature. They attributed yield inflation to careless measurement of yield on reactions conducted on small scale, wishful thinking and a desire to report higher numbers for publication purposes.[11]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Yield (chemistry)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In chemistry, the yield of a quantifies its efficiency by comparing the amount of desired product actually obtained to the maximum amount theoretically possible based on the reactants' , typically expressed as a called percent yield. The theoretical yield represents the ideal quantity of product that would form if the reaction proceeded completely without losses, calculated from the balanced and the limiting reagent's amount. The actual yield, in contrast, is the measurable or volume of product recovered experimentally after the reaction, which is always less than or equal to the theoretical yield due to practical limitations. Percent yield is computed using the formula: Percent yield=(actual yieldtheoretical yield)×100%\text{Percent yield} = \left( \frac{\text{actual yield}}{\text{theoretical yield}} \right) \times 100\% This metric allows chemists to assess reaction performance objectively. Several factors influence percent yield, including incomplete reactant conversion, competing side reactions that produce byproducts, and physical losses during , extraction, or purification steps. Reaction conditions such as , , presence, and reaction time also play critical roles, as optimizing them can minimize inefficiencies and boost yields. In , yields are commonly distinguished as crude yield (from the unpurified reaction mixture) and isolated yield (after purification to remove impurities), with the latter being the standard reported value in to reflect practical usability. Yield is a of chemical , particularly in industrial applications where high percent yields (>90%) are essential for cost-effectiveness, resource conservation, and environmental sustainability, as low yields increase waste and raw material consumption. In frameworks, maximizing yield alongside selectivity contributes to the overall efficiency of a process, alongside metrics such as .

Fundamental Concepts

Definitions of Yield

In chemistry, yield refers to the efficiency of a chemical reaction in producing a desired product from reactants. The standard measure is percent yield, which compares the actual amount of product obtained to the theoretical maximum possible based on the of the reactants, expressed as a . Yield is distinguished between absolute and relative forms. Absolute yield denotes the actual quantity of product isolated, expressed in moles or (e.g., grams of pure, dry product), providing a direct measure of output without reference to expectations. In contrast, relative yield compares the obtained product to the theoretical maximum, scaling the absolute amount against stoichiometric ideals to yield a fractional or value that assesses reaction performance. Relative yield can be expressed as mass yield, calculated using masses of the product, or molar yield, calculated using moles of the product. Mass yield and molar yield may differ due to variations in the molar masses of reactants and products. Mathematically, percent yield YY (or reaction yield WW) is calculated as: Y=(actual yieldtheoretical yield)×100%Y = \left( \frac{\text{actual yield}}{\text{theoretical yield}} \right) \times 100\% where actual yield is the moles (or mass) of product obtained, and theoretical yield is the maximum moles (or mass) possible from the initial amount of limiting reactant and balanced equation stoichiometry. The actual and theoretical yields must use consistent units (either both in moles for molar yield or both in mass for mass yield). This equation provides an objective assessment of reaction performance. In chemical reactions, conversion (often denoted as XX or χ\chi) is defined as the fraction of the initial amount of a limiting reactant that is consumed to form products, irrespective of the specific products generated. This metric quantifies the overall extent of reactant transformation and is typically expressed as a , ranging from 0 (no reaction) to 1 (complete consumption). Selectivity (denoted as SS) measures the fraction of the converted reactant that yields the desired product, excluding byproducts or undesired species. It highlights the reaction's preference for the target pathway amid competing routes and is also expressed as a between 0 and 1. High selectivity indicates efficient directing of the reaction toward the intended outcome. The yield (YY) of a desired product relates directly to these metrics through the equation Y=X×SY = X \times S, where yield represents the overall efficiency in producing the target from the initial reactant. For instance, a reaction achieving 80% conversion but only 60% selectivity results in a 48% yield, as 20% of the reactant forms undesired products. This relationship holds across contexts, though in stoichiometric reactions, conversion typically reflects total reactant depletion, whereas in catalytic processes, it often pertains to single-pass conversion to avoid catalyst deactivation issues.

Yield Types and Calculations

Theoretical Yield

The theoretical yield in a represents the maximum quantity of a desired product that can be produced from the given amounts of reactants, assuming ideal conditions of complete reaction and no losses. This value serves as a benchmark for evaluating reaction and is derived solely from stoichiometric principles without considering experimental realities. To determine the theoretical yield, the first step is to identify the , defined as the reactant that is entirely consumed first and thus dictates the extent of the reaction. This involves converting the masses or volumes of all reactants to moles using their respective molar masses or densities, then comparing these amounts to the stoichiometric ratios in the balanced . The reactant yielding the smallest amount of product when scaled by these ratios is the limiting reagent. For instance, in the reaction \ceA+2B−>C\ce{A + 2B -> C} (a 1:2 ratio), if 1 mole of A and 3 moles of B are available, A is limiting because it can produce only 1 mole of C, while B is in excess and does not constrain the output. In contrast, for the reaction \ce2H2+O2−>2H2O\ce{2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O} (a 2:1 molar ratio of H2 to O2), stoichiometric proportions (2 moles of H2 and 1 mole of O2) would make both limiting, but excess of one shifts the limit to the other. Once the is identified, the theoretical yield is calculated by applying the from the balanced to find the moles of product, followed by conversion to . The general is: Theoretical yield=nlimiting×νproductνlimiting×Mproduct\text{Theoretical yield} = n_{\text{limiting}} \times \frac{\nu_{\text{product}}}{\nu_{\text{limiting}}} \times M_{\text{product}} where nlimitingn_{\text{limiting}} is the number of moles of the , νproduct\nu_{\text{product}} and νlimiting\nu_{\text{limiting}} are the stoichiometric coefficients of the product and , respectively, and MproductM_{\text{product}} is the of the product in grams per mole. This approach inherently ignores non-limiting (excess) reagents, as their surplus does not affect the maximum product formation dictated by the limiting one. For example, in the synthesis of via \ceN2+3H2−>2NH3\ce{N2 + 3H2 -> 2NH3}, starting with 1 mole of N2 (limiting) and 4 moles of H2 (excess) yields a theoretical maximum of 2 moles of NH3, or 34 grams, based on the 1:2 of N2 to NH3. The theoretical yield calculation rests on key assumptions, including 100% conversion of the to the product and the absence of side reactions that could divert reactants to unwanted byproducts. It also presumes perfect atom utilization, wherein all atoms from the reactants contribute to the desired product—a principle that underpins in , emphasizing reaction designs that minimize waste at the molecular level. Actual yields in laboratory settings are typically lower than this theoretical maximum due to real-world inefficiencies.

Actual Yield and Percent Yield

The actual yield of a is defined as the mass or molar quantity of the desired product that is experimentally isolated and measured after the reaction and any purification processes. This value represents the tangible outcome of the synthesis, typically determined through techniques like weighing or spectroscopic , and serves as the empirical counterpart to the theoretical yield calculated from . The percent yield quantifies the efficiency of a reaction by expressing the actual yield as a percentage of the theoretical yield, providing a standardized metric for evaluating performance across experiments. It is computed using the formula % Yield=(actual yieldtheoretical yield)×100\% \text{ Yield} = \left( \frac{\text{actual yield}}{\text{theoretical yield}} \right) \times 100 where the actual and theoretical yields must be in consistent units, such as grams or moles, to avoid errors in the ratio. Percent yields are commonly categorized to gauge reaction success; for example, values exceeding 95% are considered quantitative, indicating near-complete conversion, while those between 80% and 95% are regarded as good./06:Chemical_Reactions-_Mole_and_Mass_Relationships/6.05:_Limiting_Reagent_and_Percent_Yield) Discrepancies between actual and theoretical yields often stem from incomplete reactant consumption or the generation of undesired side products, which reduce the amount of isolated main product. These differences highlight practical limitations in achieving ideal stoichiometric outcomes.

Practical Applications and Examples

Calculation Examples

To illustrate the application of percent yield calculations, consider a simple esterification reaction between acetic acid (CH₃COOH) and (C₂H₅OH) to produce (CH₃COOC₂H₅) and : CH3COOH+C2H5OH→CH3COOC2H5+H2O\text{CH}_3\text{COOH} + \text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH} \rightarrow \text{CH}_3\text{COOC}_2\text{H}_5 + \text{H}_2\text{O} Starting with 120 g of acetic acid (molar mass 60 g/mol) and 230 g of ethanol (molar mass 46 g/mol), first convert masses to moles: 120 g / 60 g/mol = 2.00 mol acetic acid and 230 g / 46 g/mol = 5.00 mol . The 1:1 indicates acetic acid is the , so the theoretical yield of (molar mass 88 g/mol) is 2.00 mol × 88 g/mol = 176 g. If the actual yield is 132 g, the percent yield is (132 g / 176 g) × 100% = 75%. For a gas-phase reaction like ammonia synthesis (N₂ + 3H₂ → 2NH₃), non-ideal stoichiometry often involves excess reagents to drive equilibrium. Suppose 100.0 g N₂ (molar mass 28 g/mol) and 25.0 g H₂ (molar mass 2 g/mol) react to form (molar mass 17 g/mol). Moles are 100.0 g / 28 g/mol ≈ 3.57 mol N₂ and 25.0 g / 2 g/mol = 12.5 mol H₂. Based on , 3.57 mol N₂ could produce 7.14 mol NH₃, while 12.5 mol H₂ could produce 8.33 mol NH₃, making N₂ the and theoretical yield 7.14 mol × 17 g/mol ≈ 121 g NH₃. With an actual yield of 28.96 g, the percent yield is (28.96 g / 121 g) × 100% ≈ 24%. In multi-step syntheses, overall yield is the product of individual step yields. For a two-step process with 90% yield in the first step and 85% in the second, the overall yield is 0.90 × 0.85 × 100% = 76.5%, assuming no losses between steps. Common pitfalls in these calculations include forgetting to convert reagent masses to moles before applying stoichiometry, which can lead to incorrect identification of the limiting reagent, or neglecting the purity of starting materials, resulting in overestimated theoretical yields.

Factors Affecting Yield

In reversible reactions, the yield is limited by the position of equilibrium, where the forward and reverse reactions occur at equal rates, preventing complete conversion to products. According to , altering conditions such as temperature, pressure, or concentration can shift the equilibrium to favor higher yields; for exothermic reactions, lowering the temperature increases the and thus the yield, while for endothermic reactions, the opposite holds. Side reactions, which are competing pathways that produce undesired byproducts, significantly reduce the yield of the target product by diverting reactants away from the desired route. These pathways often arise from impurities or unintended conditions, lowering selectivity—the ratio of desired product to total products formed—and can decrease yields by forming multiple side products that complicate isolation. Selectivity plays a key role in mitigating these effects by prioritizing the main reaction over alternatives. Physical factors profoundly influence yield through their impact on reaction kinetics and thermodynamics. Temperature affects yield via the , which describes how the rate constant increases exponentially with temperature due to higher molecular energy, accelerating reactions but potentially favoring side paths or shifting equilibria in reversible systems. For gas-phase reactions, increasing pressure raises reactant concentrations, enhancing collision rates and yields in equilibria with fewer moles of gas on the product side, as per . Solvent choice modulates yield by stabilizing transition states, influencing , and altering reaction rates; polar solvents often accelerate ionic reactions but may promote side reactions in nonpolar systems. Catalyst efficiency further boosts yields by lowering activation energies for the desired pathway, increasing rates without shifting equilibrium, and improving selectivity in heterogeneous or . Human errors during synthesis, such as incomplete mixing leading to uneven reactant distribution or impurities in causing side reactions, contribute to yield reductions. Each handling or transfer step typically results in material losses from adhesion to glassware or , contributing to yield reductions in settings and compounding in multistep syntheses. In modern , process optimizations like microwave-assisted reactions address these factors by enabling rapid, uniform heating that enhances kinetics and selectivity, often increasing yields by 10-30% compared to conventional methods while reducing use and . These approaches align with sustainable principles by minimizing side reactions through precise control of and pressure.

Measurement and Reporting

Product Purification Impacts

In organic synthesis, the crude yield represents the amount of product obtained immediately after the reaction and workup, prior to any purification steps, while the isolated yield refers to the quantity recovered after purification processes that achieve typically greater than 95% purity, as required for reliable characterization and reporting. This distinction is critical because purification inevitably introduces losses, reducing the isolated yield relative to the crude yield due to material remaining in solvents, on supports, or as residues. Common purification methods in include recrystallization and , each contributing specific losses to the overall yield. In recrystallization, losses of 5-10% often occur due to the of the product in the mother liquor, even under optimized cooling conditions, as a portion of the compound remains dissolved to maintain saturation. , particularly flash or preparative column techniques, can result in 20-50% recovery losses depending on scale and conditions, stemming from product adsorption to the stationary phase, incomplete , or during removal. These methods ensure high purity but at the expense of yield, highlighting the trade-off inherent in post-reaction processing. To minimize purification losses, chemists employ strategies such as selecting solvents with minimal product at low temperatures for recrystallization, which maximizes recovery from the mother liquor. Scale significantly influences purification efficiency and yield impacts. At laboratory scales, methods like dominate but suffer higher relative losses due to surface effects and manual handling; in contrast, industrial scales favor , which achieves recoveries exceeding 99% with relative losses often below 1%, as large volumes minimize proportional hold-up in equipment. This scalability underscores why actual yields, including purification, are often lower in lab settings than in production.

Internal Standard Methods

The internal standard method is a quantitative analytical technique used to determine reaction yields by incorporating a known amount of an inert compound into the sample, enabling direct comparison of signal responses between the (product) and the standard to account for variations in sample handling or instrument response. This approach is particularly valuable in for complex mixtures where direct isolation is challenging, as it compensates for losses during extraction, dilution, or injection without requiring complete purification. For example, in (GC), or is commonly added as an internal standard to quantify yields by comparing peak areas, ensuring accuracy even in volatile reaction products. The method is applied across several chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques, including GC, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. In GC and HPLC, the internal standard—such as decane for polymerization monitoring or triphenylmethane for multi-component reactions—facilitates yield calculation through peak area ratios, with calibration relying on the relative response factor, often calculated as the ratio of (peak area to concentration) for the analyte relative to the standard, to determine analyte concentrations from peak area ratios. In NMR spectroscopy, standards like 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene or the residual CDCl₃ signal are used for quantitative ¹H NMR (qNMR), where integral ratios provide yield data after accounting for proton counts and response adjustments. These techniques allow for precise determination in crude reaction mixtures, bridging gaps from incomplete purification. A key advantage of internal standards is their ability to mitigate errors from incomplete extraction or injection variability, delivering high precision; for instance, in polymer reactions monitored by GC or NMR with as the standard, yields can be measured to 0.1% relative standard deviation in triplicate analyses. This enhances reliability in kinetic studies or compared to external calibration methods. However, limitations include the necessity for the standard to be chemically inert and non-interfering with signals—such as avoiding overlapping peaks in —or it may compromise accuracy; additionally, the method is less suitable for heterogeneous reactions involving solids, where uniform dissolution of the standard cannot be assured.

Yield Reporting Standards

In scientific literature, isolated yields for chemical reactions are typically reported alongside purity assessments, with purity levels exceeding 95% confirmed through techniques such as (NMR) or (GC). If the reported yield pertains to crude product rather than purified material, this distinction must be explicitly stated to ensure transparency in the experimental outcomes. Ethical concerns in yield reporting primarily revolve around yield inflation, often resulting from selective reporting of optimal results while omitting failed or lower-yield attempts, which can mislead the about reaction reliability. Historical analyses of publications from the late , including cases in the , have highlighted instances where pressure to achieve high-impact results led to exaggerated purity and yield data, underscoring the need for rigorous verification to maintain integrity in the field. Professional guidelines emphasize comprehensive documentation, including reaction scale (e.g., in grams or millimoles) and confidence intervals to reflect variability and support . These practices, aligned with recommendations from major chemical societies, help standardize reporting and facilitate comparison across studies. Contemporary trends in yield reporting include mandates from open-access journals for depositing raw experimental data in public repositories, enabling independent verification and reducing opportunities for misrepresentation. Tools like further aid by aggregating reaction from , allowing researchers to compare reported yields against historical precedents for similar transformations. In contrast to academic reporting, which prioritizes isolated percent yields for synthetic novelty, industrial contexts often employ space-time yield (expressed as kg of product per m³ of volume per unit time) to evaluate process efficiency and in continuous operations.

References

  1. https://www.chem.ucla.edu/~harding/IGOC/Y/yield.html
  2. https://users.highland.edu/~jsullivan/genchem/s10_percent_yield.html
  3. https://pressbooks.online.ucf.edu/chemistryfundamentals/chapter/reaction-yields/
  4. https://web.ung.edu/media/chemistry/Chapter3/ReactionYields.pdf
  5. https://open.maricopa.edu/chm130mcc/chapter/5-7-yields/
  6. https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/chemistry/chapter/reaction-yields/
  7. https://www-backup.salemstate.edu/how-to-find-percent-yield-in-chemistry
  8. https://www.chem.rochester.edu/notvoodoo/pages/how_to.php?page=improve_yield
  9. https://www.monash.edu/student-academic-success/chemistry/yield-of-reactions
  10. https://www.scranton.edu/faculty/cannm/green-chemistry/english/organicmodule.shtml
  11. https://www.chem.rochester.edu/notvoodoo/pages/reaction.php?page=purification
  12. https://lucyinstitute.nd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/3589335.3651470.pdf
  13. https://www.chem.tamu.edu/rgroup/djd/chem483/Lectures/Metrics%20to%20green%20chem.pdf
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/absolute-yield
  15. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/12%3A_Stoichiometry/12.09%3A_Theoretical_Yield_and_Percent_Yield
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128038932/experimental-organic-chemistry
  17. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cs3005264
  18. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2015/gc/c5gc00340g
  19. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Map%253A_A_Molecular_Approach_%28Tro%29/04%253A_Chemical_Reactions_and_Aqueous_Reactions/4.03%253A_4.3_Limiting_Reactant_Theoretical_Yield_and_Percent_Yield
  20. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/hs-chemistry/x2613d8165d88df5e:stoichiometry-and-the-mole/x2613d8165d88df5e:stoichiometry/a/limiting-reagents-and-percent-yield
  21. https://openstax.org/books/chemistry-2e/pages/4-4-reaction-yields
  22. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Inorganic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_and_Websites_%28Inorganic_Chemistry%29/Chemical_Reactions/Stoichiometry/Theoretical_and_Actual_Yields
  23. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/chem1114langaracollege/chapter/4-4-reaction-yields/
  24. https://byjus.com/chemistry/finding-theoretical-yield/
  25. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Environmental_Chemistry/Green_Chemistry_and_the_Ten_Commandments_of_Sustainability_%28Manahan%29/05%253A_Chemical_Reactions-_Making_Materials_Safely_and_Sustainable/5.04%253A_New_Page
  26. https://do-server1.sfs.uwm.edu/upload/80A932984E/lib/64A216E/chemical_reactions__practice_problems.pdf
  27. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Map:_Chemistry_and_Chemical_Reactivity_(Kotz_et_al.)/04:_Chemical_Reactions_and_Aqueous_Reactions/4.03:_4.3_Limiting_Reactant_Theoretical_Yield_and_Percent_Yield
  28. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Chem1_(Lower)/05:_Stoichiometry_and_the_Mole/5.06:_Yields
  29. https://www.albert.io/blog/understanding-percent-yield-and-theoretical-yield/
  30. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01524
  31. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Supplemental_Modules_(Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry)/Kinetics/06%3A_Modeling_Reaction_Kinetics/6.02%3A_Temperature_Dependence_of_Reaction_Rates/6.2.03%3A_The_Arrhenius_Law/6.2.3.01%3A_Arrhenius_Equation
  32. https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aic.14873
  33. https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainscatalysts
  34. https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/yields/
  35. https://sphinxsai.com/sphinxsaiVol_2No.1/ChemTech_Vol_2No.1/ChemTech_Vol_2No.1PDF/CT=93%20(592-597).pdf
  36. https://www.aroonchande.com/files/ol/Yield.pdf
  37. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cc800070a
  38. https://researcher-resources.acs.org/publish/author_guidelines?coden=joceah
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10778086/
  40. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Organic_Chemistry_Lab_Techniques/3%3A_Crystallization/3.04%3A_Crystallization_Theory/3.4D%3A_The_Unavoidable_Loss_of_Recovery
  41. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00382
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894701001711
  43. https://istsurface.com/resources/solvent-distillation-system/
  44. https://www.chem.tamu.edu/rgroup/gladysz/documents/internalstandards.pdf
  45. https://www.rsc.org/suppdata/cy/c4/c4cy01632g/c4cy01632g1.pdf
  46. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed100404r
  47. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/mr/d4mr00145a
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8541192/
  49. https://acanthusresearch.com/generalblog/quantitative-nmr-spectroscopy/
  50. https://www.rsc.org/publishing/publish-with-us/publish-a-journal-article/experimental-reporting
  51. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cen-v089n022.p050
  52. https://researcher-resources.acs.org/publish/data_guidelines
  53. https://researcher-resources.acs.org/publish/data_policy
  54. https://spj.science.org/doi/10.34133/research.0292
  55. https://www.biopharminternational.com/view/the-optimal-metric-of-space-time-yield
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.