Hubbry Logo
Computer network diagramComputer network diagramMain
Open search
Computer network diagram
Community hub
Computer network diagram
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Computer network diagram
Computer network diagram
Computer network diagram
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A computer network diagram is a schematic depicting the nodes and connections amongst nodes in a computer network or, more generally, any telecommunications network. Computer network diagrams form an important part of network documentation.

Symbolization

[edit]
A sample network diagram

Readily identifiable icons are used to depict common network appliances, e.g. routers, and the style of lines between them indicates the type of connection. Clouds are used to represent networks external to the one pictured for the purposes of depicting connections between internal and external devices, without indicating the specifics of the outside network. For example, in the hypothetical local area network pictured to the right, three personal computers and a server are connected to a switch; the server is further connected to a printer and a gateway router, which is connected via a WAN link to the Internet.[1]

Depending on whether the diagram is intended for formal or informal use, certain details may be lacking and must be determined from context. For example, the sample diagram does not indicate the physical type of connection between the PCs and the switch, but since a modern LAN is depicted, Ethernet may be assumed. If the same style of line was used in a WAN (wide area network) diagram, however, it may indicate a different type of connection.

At different scales diagrams may represent various levels of network granularity. At the LAN level, individual nodes may represent individual physical devices, such as hubs or file servers, while at the WAN level, individual nodes may represent entire cities. In addition, when the scope of a diagram crosses the common LAN/MAN/WAN boundaries, representative hypothetical devices may be depicted instead of showing all actually existing nodes. For example, if a network appliance is intended to be connected through the Internet to many end-user mobile devices, only a single such device may be depicted for the purposes of showing the general relationship between the appliance and any such device.

Cisco symbolization

[edit]

Cisco uses its own brand of networking symbols. Since Cisco has a large Internet presence and designs a broad variety of network devices, its list of symbols ("Network Topology Icons") is exhaustive.[2]

Topology

[edit]
Main article: Network topology

The physical network topology can be directly represented in a network diagram, as it is simply the physical graph represented by the diagrams, with network nodes as vertices and connections as undirected or direct edges (depending on the type of connection).[3] The logical network topology can be inferred from the network diagram if details of the network protocols in use are also given.

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Computer network diagram

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A computer network diagram is a visual that illustrates the structure of a computer or by depicting its key components—such as nodes (e.g., computers, servers, routers, switches, and firewalls) and connections (e.g., cables, wireless links, or protocols)—and how they interconnect to enable data transmission and resource sharing. These diagrams serve as essential tools for representing both the physical layout of hardware and the logical flow of within the network. Network diagrams are primarily used for planning, designing, documenting, and computer networks, allowing administrators to visualize configurations, identify potential bottlenecks, and ensure compliance with standards like PCI for secure data handling. They facilitate communication among stakeholders, such as IT teams and vendors, by providing a clear map of that highlights segmentation, subnets, and device interactions, which is crucial for maintaining and . In addition, these diagrams support risk assessments by showing how components are isolated or interconnected, including details like IP addresses, hostnames, and geographical locations. There are two main types of computer network diagrams: physical diagrams, which detail the tangible arrangement of devices, cabling, and hardware placements (e.g., in a or across buildings), and logical diagrams, which focus on the abstract data pathways, routing protocols, and virtual elements like VLANs or firewalls without regard to physical locations. Common topologies represented include star, bus, ring, mesh, and hybrid configurations, each influencing , , and . Standardized symbols, such as those from , are often employed to ensure consistency and readability across diagrams.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

A computer network diagram is a visual representation of a computer or network's structure, depicting the devices, connections, and data flow paths within the system. These diagrams serve essential purposes in network design and , including layouts to optimize , troubleshooting connectivity issues by identifying potential failure points, documenting for ongoing maintenance, and communicating designs to stakeholders for collaborative decision-making. By providing a clear schematic overview, network diagrams simplify the understanding of complex systems, facilitate assessments of for future expansions, and support compliance with regulatory standards such as ISO/IEC 27001, which requires documented network controls to ensure . In enterprise environments, they are commonly applied during initial network deployments to map out configurations, upgrades to evaluate impacts, and audits to verify operational integrity.

Historical Development

The origins of diagrams trace back to the late 1960s, during the planning and initial development of the , the precursor to the modern . Early diagrams consisted of simple hand-drawn sketches mapping host connections and potential topologies, such as Larry Roberts' rough sketch of ARPANET's possible structure, which visualized node interconnections across U.S. research institutions. These rudimentary representations, often created by researchers at organizations like the and , focused on illustrating packet-switching concepts and geographical layouts to facilitate collaboration among sites. In the 1970s and 1980s, the adoption of layered architectural models profoundly shaped network diagramming practices. The OSI Reference Model, developed through international efforts starting in 1977 and formalized in ISO 7498 by 1984, introduced a seven-layer abstraction that encouraged diagrams to depict network functions hierarchically, separating physical connections from higher-level protocols. Similarly, the TCP/IP protocol suite, which replaced the ARPANET's NCP in 1983, promoted four-layer diagrams illustrating data encapsulation and protocol interactions, influencing visual standards for representing end-to-end communication flows. This era marked a shift from ad hoc sketches to structured, layered visuals that emphasized modularity and interoperability in growing networks. The 1990s brought standardization efforts that professionalized network diagrams, with industry leaders like contributing iconic symbol sets for common hardware. As expanded in the early 1990s, its vector icons for routers, switches, and hubs became widely adopted in documentation and design tools, providing consistent visual shorthand for complex topologies. Concurrently, ITU-T recommendations in the Z-series, particularly enhancements to Message Sequence Charts (MSC) during the decade, formalized diagrammatic notations for protocol interactions and system behaviors in telecommunications networks. Post-2000 advancements integrated network diagrams with digital authoring tools, emphasizing scalability through vector-based formats. The acquisition and evolution of in 2000 solidified its role as a premier vector diagramming application, enabling dynamic, resolution-independent representations of large-scale networks. Key milestones included the 2000s rise of UML extensions for network modeling, which adapted class and deployment diagrams to analyze distributed system performance and architecture. These developments transformed diagrams from static illustrations into interactive, model-driven artifacts supporting and .

Elements and Symbols

Standard Components

Computer network diagrams universally incorporate core components to represent the essential elements of a . These include devices such as routers, switches, and endpoints like personal computers (PCs) and servers, which serve as nodes facilitating and transmission. Connections are depicted as lines or arcs symbolizing physical cables or wireless links between devices, while labels provide identifying details such as IP addresses and port numbers to clarify network addressing and access points. Standard conventions govern the visual representation of these components to ensure clarity and consistency across diagrams. Devices are typically illustrated using simple shapes, such as rectangles for general endpoints and switches or circles for routers, promoting abstract and memorable without unnecessary detail. Lines represent connections, with variations in thickness indicating link speeds and colors distinguishing types, for example, blue for Ethernet cabling and red for optic or alert conditions. Annotations, including text labels for protocols like tags, are added adjacent to components to denote operational specifics such as media types or performance metrics. Layered elements from the are represented in diagram annotations to highlight functional abstractions, particularly the physical, , and network layers. The is shown through cabling and hardware connections, the via switches and configurations, and the network layer with routers and IP subnet delineations. These representations, aligned with the OSI reference model defined in ISO/IEC 7498-1, aid in distinguishing physical from logical aspects by emphasizing layer-specific emphases in component depiction. Best practices for standard components emphasize and through grouping and explanatory aids. External networks or complex segments are often abstracted using symbols to simplify large-scale views, while enclosures group related devices into functional blocks like security zones. Legends are included to define all shapes, lines, colors, and annotations, ensuring diagrams remain interpretable regardless of the viewer's familiarity.

Specialized Symbol Sets

Specialized symbol sets extend the foundational elements of computer network diagrams by providing industry-specific or vendor-defined libraries tailored to particular technologies, devices, or architectures. These sets enable more precise representations in diagrams, such as those depicting proprietary hardware or cloud services, while maintaining compatibility with standard components like nodes and connections. Cisco offers one of the most comprehensive specialized symbol for network diagramming, featuring globally recognized icons for its hardware and software. The includes symbols for routers (often depicted with arrowhead shapes indicating flow), firewalls (represented by brick wall patterns symbolizing barriers), and VoIP devices (shown as or endpoint icons). These are distributed through Cisco's official Visio stencil files, which support detailed illustrations. Other notable specialized sets include Microsoft Visio's built-in networking shapes, which have been available since the software's early versions in the and encompass icons for various network elements like servers, hubs, and wireless access points. For cloud environments, (AWS) provides architecture icons launched in December 2011, designed specifically for diagramming services such as EC2 instances, S3 buckets, and VPCs in cloud-based network layouts. Additionally, symbols aligned with standards, particularly for wireless technologies like 802.11 (), are used in diagrams to denote access points, antennas, and signal propagation, drawing from the physical and MAC layer specifications outlined in the standards. Adoption of these specialized sets faces interoperability challenges, as varying formats across vendors can complicate integration in multi-tool environments. XML-based formats like (SVG) address this by enabling scalable, portable sharing of symbols without loss of detail, facilitating their use across diagramming software. Tools like exemplify practical application through custom shape libraries, where users import SVG files or Visio stencils to create symbols for hybrid cloud environments, such as combining on-premises servers with AWS or Azure components in a single diagram.

Diagram Types

Physical Diagrams

Physical network diagrams provide a visual representation of the tangible components and layout of a computer network, focusing on the actual hardware devices, their physical interconnections, and spatial arrangements. These diagrams map out the precise placement of equipment such as servers, routers, switches, and workstations, along with the routes of cabling like Ethernet cables or fiber optics, ensuring an accurate depiction of the network's physical topology at the OSI model's Layer 1. Key elements in physical diagrams include detailed illustrations of rack layouts, where servers and networking gear are mounted within cabinets, showing port assignments and cable terminations for clarity during maintenance. Distance measurements between devices, environmental considerations such as power sources and cooling systems, and specific media types (e.g., copper versus multimode fiber) are also incorporated to reflect real-world installations. A legend typically accompanies the diagram to explain symbols, colors, and icons representing components like switch stacks or individual ports. These diagrams are essential for use cases such as installation in data centers, where they facilitate and adherence to standards like , which outlines requirements for including pathways, spaces, and cabling to ensure reliability and scalability. In office environments, they support inventory management by tracking device locations and connections, while in troubleshooting scenarios, they enable quick identification of physical faults like faulty cables or overloaded racks. The primary advantages of physical diagrams lie in their high accuracy for hardware-related tasks, allowing teams to plan capacity expansions or optimize layouts for efficiency, such as minimizing cable lengths to reduce signal degradation. However, they have limitations, including the need for frequent manual updates in dynamic environments, which can be labor-intensive without automation tools, and they do not address software configurations or data flows, unlike complementary logical diagrams that abstract functional relationships.

Logical Diagrams

Logical network diagrams represent the functional and abstract organization of network traffic and protocols, focusing on data flow, addressing schemes, and logical groupings such as subnets and VLANs, while excluding details about physical hardware or cabling layouts. These diagrams emphasize how information moves through the network via software-defined paths and configurations, often diverging from the actual physical topology to highlight virtual or protocol-based interactions. By abstracting away tangible elements, they provide a high-level view suitable for understanding network behavior at the protocol and configuration levels. Key elements in logical network diagrams include representations of protocol stacks, such as paths that illustrate how packets are forwarded between logical segments; zones, where firewalls act as boundaries to enforce access controls; and virtual connections, exemplified by VPN tunnels that secure transmission across remote sites. These components are depicted using standardized notations for logical entities like IP addresses, identifiers, and protocols, enabling visualization of transmission without reference to device locations or wiring. Logical network diagrams find application in security auditing to verify policy enforcement and identify vulnerabilities, and software-defined networking (SDN) design to map control plane abstractions over data flows. In SDN contexts, they outline the separation of control and data planes, aiding in the orchestration of virtual overlays. One advantage of logical diagrams is their utility in software and configuration issues, as they clearly delineate data paths and protocol interactions for rapid diagnosis. However, a limitation is their tendency to oversimplify hardware constraints, such as bandwidth limitations or physical bottlenecks, which physical diagrams address by providing the underlying hardware context in a single complementary view.

Network Topologies

Common Topologies

A topology refers to the arrangement of various elements (links, nodes, etc.) in a , which can be represented physically or logically in diagrams. Common topologies include bus, , ring, , and hybrid, each offering distinct structural characteristics that influence performance, reliability, and scalability. Bus topology employs a linear backbone cable, known as the bus, to which all devices connect via taps or connectors, enabling shared medium access for data transmission. This design simplifies installation with minimal cabling requirements and low cost, making it suitable for small-scale networks. However, it suffers from a —if the backbone cable breaks, the entire network fails—and is prone to collisions in high-traffic scenarios due to the shared medium, limiting scalability for larger or busier environments. Historically, bus topology formed the basis of early Ethernet implementations, such as standardized in in 1983, which used thick for 10 Mbps transmission over up to 500 meters. The original Ethernet concept, introduced in the 1976 paper by Metcalfe and Boggs, relied on this bus structure for distributed in local networks. Star topology centers around a hub, switch, or router to which each node connects individually via dedicated links, forming a star-like pattern that centralizes data routing. Its advantages include straightforward fault isolation—issues with one node do not affect others—and ease of expansion by adding connections to the central device, contributing to its prevalence in modern local area networks (LANs). A key drawback is dependency on the central hub; its failure disrupts the whole network, though redundant hubs can mitigate this. This topology dominates contemporary Ethernet LANs, as specified in IEEE 802.3 standards for twisted-pair cabling (e.g., 10BASE-T and later), enabling efficient switched networking at speeds up to 100 Gbps or more. Ring topology arranges devices in a closed loop, where data circulates unidirectionally, often using a token-passing mechanism to control access and prevent collisions. Benefits include predictable performance with equal access opportunities for all nodes and no contention-based delays, supporting consistent throughput in medium-sized networks. Disadvantages arise from its vulnerability to disruptions—a single link or node failure can break the ring, halting traffic until repaired, though dual-ring configurations (e.g., for ) address this partially. It gained prominence in the through IBM's , introduced in 1984 and standardized as IEEE 802.5 in 1989, operating at 4 or 16 Mbps over shielded twisted-pair wiring in logical ring over physical wiring. Mesh topology interconnects every device (full mesh) or a subset (partial mesh) directly with multiple paths, providing inherent redundancy and . Advantages encompass high reliability—traffic reroutes around failures—and robust due to dedicated links, ideal for critical applications requiring uninterrupted connectivity. However, it demands significant cabling, configuration complexity, and cost, scaling poorly beyond small networks without partial implementations. In wide area networks (WANs), partial mesh variants appear in protocols like (BGP), where internal BGP (iBGP) traditionally requires full-mesh peering among routers to exchange routing information, though route reflection relaxes this for larger scales as outlined in RFC 2796. Hybrid topology integrates elements from multiple topologies, such as combining and bus (star-bus) structures, to leverage their respective strengths for customized network designs. This approach offers flexibility, enhanced scalability, and optimized performance by adapting to specific needs, like using a central bus for backbone connectivity with star-configured endpoints for local segments. Drawbacks include increased design complexity and potential single points of failure inherited from component topologies, necessitating careful planning. Hybrid configurations are emerging in networks to integrate with mobile infrastructure, enabling hybrid topologies that support time-sensitive applications through combined wired and wireless elements, as explored in integration scenarios for factory automation.

Visual Representations

Visual representations of network topologies in computer network diagrams follow established conventions to clearly illustrate the arrangement of nodes and connections, ensuring clarity and standardization across documentation and design practices. The bus topology is typically depicted as a single horizontal line representing the backbone cable, with nodes connected via vertical taps or short lines branching off from it, symbolizing the shared medium where all devices access the common line. In contrast, the star topology is shown with a central hub or switch icon at the core, from which straight lines radiate outward like spokes to connect peripheral nodes, emphasizing the point-to-point links from the center. The ring topology appears as a closed circular loop of lines encircling the nodes, indicating the sequential connection where data circulates unidirectionally or bidirectionally around the circle. For topologies, diagrams use intersecting lines to connect multiple nodes directly to one another, often in a grid-like for full mesh or selectively for partial mesh, highlighting the multiple redundant paths available. To enhance these basic depictions and convey additional operational details, diagrams incorporate directional arrows along connection lines to indicate data flow, such as unidirectional arrows in ring topologies or bidirectional ones in setups to show traffic directionality. In representations, is visually emphasized by drawing dual or multiple parallel lines between nodes, illustrating backup paths that maintain connectivity if a link fails. For scalability in large networks, icons like cloud symbols or abbreviated clusters represent aggregated groups of nodes, avoiding the need to detail every individual connection in expansive diagrams. Examples of these conventions appear in simple sketches, such as a bus where multiple computer s tap into a straight horizontal backbone line, demonstrating easy expansion but potential single-point failure at the cable ends. A detailed might feature a switch in the center with labeled lines extending to endpoint devices like printers and servers, common in LANs. Ring diagrams often show nodes equally spaced around a loop, as in networks, while mesh examples use crisscrossing lines for high-reliability setups like backbones. Real-world applications include diagrams, where topologies connect buildings to a central , visualized with radiating lines from a core router to distributed switches across the site. Depicting complex hybrid topologies, which combine elements like star-bus or mesh-ring, presents challenges in avoiding visual clutter, as overlapping lines and numerous nodes can obscure key relationships and make the diagram difficult to interpret. To address this, digital formats employ layering techniques, where users toggle visibility of connection subsets, or zooming features to focus on specific sections without overwhelming the viewer. These methods ensure that even intricate representations remain navigable, supporting effective analysis and troubleshooting in professional network documentation.

Creation and Tools

Manual Methods

Manual methods for creating computer network diagrams rely on traditional drafting techniques, employing basic analog tools to sketch representations of network components and connections. These approaches were the primary means of documentation in the early days of networking, allowing engineers to visualize topologies and layouts without computational aids. Essential tools and materials include for precise alignment of elements, rulers for straight lines representing connections, and stencils for consistent shapes such as circles or rectangles to depict devices like routers and servers. Colored pencils can further enhance clarity by differentiating elements, for instance, using green to indicate active links and red for inactive ones. These materials facilitate hand-drawn diagrams that capture both physical and logical aspects of small to medium-sized networks. The process begins with inventorying all network components, such as devices and their interconnections, followed by sketching an outline of the overall layout on paper. Next, add symbols for devices and lines for links, ensuring minimal crossings to maintain readability; label each element with details like IP addresses or numbers. Finally, iterate by reviewing and refining the sketch for accuracy and legibility, a method particularly suited for brainstorming sessions or documenting simple networks. Historically, manual diagramming predominated before the widespread adoption of software in the , as exemplified by Robert Metcalfe's hand-drawn Ethernet diagram in 1976, which illustrated early network concepts through simple sketches. These techniques remain relevant today for on-site , where quick sketches enable rapid visualization of issues in real-time field scenarios. Despite their accessibility, manual methods are time-consuming for large-scale networks and susceptible to scaling errors, as becomes challenging without aids. To improve , employ standardized scales—such as 1:100 for device spacing—and consistent line weights to distinguish link types, though these approaches often give way to software alternatives for complex environments.

Software and Automation

Software tools have revolutionized the creation and maintenance of diagrams by providing intuitive interfaces, automation capabilities, and integration options that surpass traditional manual methods. These applications enable users to visualize architectures efficiently, supporting both simple sketches and enterprise-scale representations. Among the most widely adopted software solutions is , first launched in 1992 as a diagramming tool that introduced drag-and-drop interfaces for creating network diagrams with predefined stencils for devices like routers and switches. Visio's network diagramming features include shape libraries compliant with standards such as icons, allowing users to build layered diagrams representing physical and logical topologies. Lucidchart, introduced in 2010, offers a cloud-based platform emphasizing collaborative editing for network diagrams, where multiple users can contribute in real-time via web browsers without requiring software installation. Its features include automated shape alignment and data linking, which dynamically update diagrams based on imported network data sources. Recent AI advancements include Lucid AI for text-to-diagram generation, such as creating flowcharts from prompts, introduced around 2023. For open-source alternatives, draw.io (now part of ), available since 2008, provides a free, browser-based tool for generating network diagrams with extensive template libraries and export options, making it accessible for individual users and small teams. It supports integration with storage services like and , facilitating for diagram evolution. Key features across these tools include auto-generation of diagrams from network scans, such as importing data via SNMP protocols to automatically populate device inventories and connections. Real-time updates are enabled through APIs that sync with live systems, ensuring diagrams reflect current configurations without manual intervention. Additionally, export functionalities support formats like PDF for documentation and for in presentations. Advanced automation extends to integrations with discovery tools like Network Topology Mapper, which uses active scanning to generate baseline that can be imported into diagramming software for ongoing maintenance. Configuration management platforms such as further automate creation by parsing infrastructure-as-code definitions to produce visual representations of deployment states. Post-2020 developments have incorporated AI-assisted layout algorithms in tools like and , which optimize node placement and routing paths based on to reduce visual clutter in large-scale ; for example, integrated Copilot AI in 2024 for enhanced diagramming assistance. When selecting software for network diagramming, organizations consider factors such as cost—ranging from free options like draw.io to subscription-based models in starting at $9.00 per user monthly (as of November 2025)—compatibility with vendor-specific integrations like Cisco's APIs, and to handle diagrams for networks exceeding thousands of nodes in enterprise environments. These criteria ensure the tool aligns with operational needs, from ad-hoc visualizations to automated, compliance-driven .

References

  1. https://www.lucidchart.com/pages/network-diagram
  2. https://www.security.uci.edu/program/risk-assessment/network-diagram/
  3. https://www.itglue.com/blog/network-diagrams/
  4. https://www.cisco.com/site/us/en/learn/topics/networking/what-is-network-topology.html
  5. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/brand-center/network-topology-icons.html
  6. https://www.auvik.com/franklyit/blog/effective-network-diagrams/
  7. https://blog.rsisecurity.com/the-importance-of-having-a-network-diagram/
  8. https://www.figma.com/resource-library/what-is-a-network-diagram/
  9. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/business-insights-ideas/resources/tips-for-mapping-your-network-diagram
  10. https://lakeridge.io/iso-27001/controls/8-20-networks-security
  11. https://www.hava.io/blog/hava-cloud-network-diagrams-for-compliance
  12. https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/m.dodge/cybergeography/atlas/historical.html
  13. https://www.computerhistory.org/internethistory/1960s/
  14. http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_HistoryoftheOSIReferenceModel.htm
  15. https://www.colocationamerica.com/blog/history-of-ip-address-part-2-tcp-ip
  16. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/studygroups/com17/Pages/history.aspx
  17. https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/feature/Discover-8-network-diagramming-tools-aimed-at-architects
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321620043_UML_2000_-_The_Unified_Modeling_Language_Advancing_the_Standard_Third_International_Conference_York_UK_October_2-6_2000_Proceedings
  19. https://iacis.org/iis/2008/S2008_967.pdf
  20. https://www.usg.edu/information_technology_services/assets/information_technology_services/documents/ITHB_Diagram_Guide_v1.0.pdf
  21. https://www.iso.org/standard/20269.html
  22. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1666&context=etd
  23. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/visio-stencil-listing.html
  24. https://www.conceptdraw.com/examples/pbx-visio-stencils
  25. https://news.microsoft.com/source/2001/04/25/microsoft-visio-2002-released-to-manufacturing-with-widespread-industry-support/
  26. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/introducing-aws-simple-icons-for-your-architecture-diagrams/
  27. https://www.tek.com/en/documents/primer/wi-fi-overview-80211-physical-layer-and-transmitter-measurements
  28. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-organization-architecture/ieee-802-11-architecture/
  29. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2003/july/build-xml-based-images-in-asp-net-using-scalable-vector-graphics
  30. https://help.lucid.co/hc/en-us/articles/14931750819476-Shape-libraries-in-Lucidchart
  31. https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/network-diagram-templates
  32. https://graphicalnetworks.com/blog-physical-network-diagrams-explained/
  33. https://www.dnsstuff.com/physical-logical-network-diagram
  34. https://www.gliffy.com/blog/network-diagram-examples
  35. https://www.accu-tech.com/hs-fs/hub/54495/file-15894024-pdf/docs/102264ae.pdf
  36. https://www.cbtnuggets.com/blog/technology/networking/what-is-a-logical-network-diagram
  37. https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/definition/logical-network
  38. https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/tip/Logical-vs-physical-topology-Whats-the-difference
  39. https://www.coursera.org/articles/network-diagrams
  40. https://graphicalnetworks.com/blog-what-is-a-logical-network-diagram/
  41. https://www.exam-labs.com/blog/decoding-logical-network-diagrams-a-clear-view-of-virtual-connectivity
  42. https://opennetworking.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/TR_SDN_ARCH_1.0_06062014.pdf
  43. https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/definition/network-topology
  44. https://www.nakivo.com/blog/types-of-network-topology-explained/
  45. https://www.pynetlabs.com/what-is-bus-topology-in-computer-network/
  46. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-networks/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-bus-topology/
  47. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.3/1057/
  48. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/360248.360253
  49. https://www.zenarmor.com/docs/network-basics/what-is-star-topology
  50. https://www.meter.com/resources/network-topology
  51. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-networks/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-star-topology/
  52. https://www.zenarmor.com/docs/network-basics/what-is-ring-topology
  53. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-networks/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-ring-topology/
  54. https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/definition/Token-Ring
  55. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.5/1100/
  56. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-networks/advantage-and-disadvantage-of-mesh-topology/
  57. https://www.zenarmor.com/docs/network-basics/what-is-mesh-topology
  58. https://www.boardinfinity.com/blog/mesh-topology/
  59. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2796
  60. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-networks/types-of-network-topology/
  61. https://www.zenarmor.com/docs/network-basics/what-is-hybrid-topology
  62. https://synchronet.net/hybrid-topology/
  63. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8402373/
  64. https://www.lucidchart.com/pages/network-diagram-icons-and-symbols
  65. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/[us](/page/United_States)/about/brand-center/network-topology-icons.html
  66. https://www.microsoft.com/en-[us](/page/United_States)/microsoft-365/business-insights-ideas/resources/tips-for-mapping-your-network-diagram
  67. https://synchronet.net/star-topology/
  68. https://infrastructureascode.ch/d2-network-topologies.html
  69. https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/network-diagramming-best-practices
  70. https://standards.ieee.org/beyond-standards/ethernet-50th-anniversary/
  71. https://www.staedtler.com/us/en/products/technical-drawing-instruments/
  72. https://www.engineersupply.com/drafting-templates.aspx
  73. https://www.rapidfiretools.com/blog/how-to-draw-a-network-diagram/
  74. https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/how-to-diagram-your-network-for-diagnosis-and-troubleshooting
  75. https://www.networkcomputing.com/network-automation/are-manually-created-network-diagrams-becoming-extinct-
  76. https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/ai-diagram
  77. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/what-s-new-in-visio-798f4f39-2833-486b-9ae9-55162672102e
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.