Hubbry Logo
Corydon (book)Corydon (book)Main
Open search
Corydon (book)
Community hub
Corydon (book)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Corydon (book)
Corydon (book)
Corydon (book)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Corydon is a book by André Gide consisting of four Socratic dialogues on homosexuality. The name of the book comes from Virgil's pederastic character Corydon. Parts of the text were separately privately printed from 1911 to 1920,[1] and the whole book appeared in its French original in France in May 1924 and in the United States in 1950. It is available in an English translation (ISBN 0-252-07006-2) by the poet Richard Howard.

Key Information

The dialogues use evidence from naturalists, historians, poets, and philosophers in order to back up Gide's argument that homosexuality is not unnatural and that it pervaded the most culturally and artistically advanced civilizations such as Periclean Greece, Renaissance Italy and Elizabethan England. Gide argues this is reflected by writers and artists from Homer and Virgil to Titian and Shakespeare. Gide states that these authors depicted male–male relationships, such as that of Achilles and Patroclus, as homosexual rather than as platonic as other critics insisted. Gide uses this evidence to insist that homosexuality is more fundamental and natural than exclusive heterosexuality, which he believes is merely a union constructed by society.

Gide considered Corydon to be his most important work. "My friends insist that this little book is of the kind which will do me the greatest harm", he wrote of the book.[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Corydon (book)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Corydon is a philosophical work by French author comprising four Socratic-style dialogues in which the eponymous character defends —the erotic attraction of adult males to adolescent boys—as a natural phenomenon superior to standard heterosexual pairings, marshaling purported evidence from zoological observations, ethnographic studies of , and historical practices in . Originally issued in limited, anonymous form with the first dialogue in 1911 and the second in 1920, the complete text appeared under Gide's name in 1924, marking one of the era's most explicit literary endorsements of intergenerational male relations amid widespread social taboos. The book elicited sharp condemnation for its unapologetic stance, aligning with Gide's broader oeuvre that integrated personal and pederastic inclinations into moral and aesthetic inquiry, though later critics have scrutinized its empirical claims as selective and idealized.

Gide structured Corydon to counter prevailing views of sexual inversion as pathological, positing instead that pederastic bonds foster intellectual and physical excellence, as exemplified in Greek antiquity, while critiquing modern bourgeois conventions for suppressing such instincts. Its publication underscored tensions in early 20th-century over sexuality, influencing debates on even as Gide's arguments prioritized classical precedents over contemporary or considerations. The work's notoriety persisted post-World War II, with English editions in the late 1940s drawing reviews that highlighted its provocative challenge to norms, though Gide's 1947 reflected recognition of his literary innovation over isolated polemics.

Background and Context

André Gide's Personal and Intellectual Influences

André Gide's recognition of his own emerged prominently during his early travels to , beginning with a trip to in 1893 at age 23, where he documented encounters with young Arab boys that awakened his pederastic inclinations and contrasted sharply with the puritanical Protestant upbringing imposed by his mother. These experiences, revisited in subsequent visits around 1898 to 1902, provided empirical personal evidence that fueled his later defense of such relations as natural, prompting initial drafts of Corydon as early as the 1890s amid internal conflict over societal norms. In October 1895, shortly after his mother's death, Gide married his cousin Madeleine Rondeaux in a union that remained unconsummated and childless, reflecting his ongoing struggle with conventional expectations and reinforcing his reflections on non-reproductive sexual orientations. Intellectually, Gide drew from classical Greek sources, particularly Plato's , which portrayed erotic relationships between men and youths as integral to philosophical and aesthetic elevation, aligning with his first-principles view of human drives unfiltered by modern moral overlays. Encounters with in in 1895 further shaped this framework; Wilde, then at the height of his influence, encouraged Gide to embrace his desires without apology, modeling a defiant that Gide adapted to critique bourgeois hypocrisy, though Gide later distanced himself from Wilde's eventual downfall as a cautionary excess. Gide regarded Corydon as his most significant work, composed intermittently from personal crises like his marital tensions and broader existential reckonings in the early , prioritizing it over novels for its unflinching of sexual realities against cultural taboos. This self-assessment stemmed from his belief that the book's dialogues synthesized biographical candor with rational inquiry, unmarred by the fictional veneers he employed elsewhere.

Historical Setting in Early 20th-Century

Following , grappled with acute depopulation anxieties, having suffered approximately 1.4 million military deaths and a net population loss that intensified longstanding fertility declines dating to the late nineteenth century. The war's demographic toll, combined with a drop to around 14 per 1,000 inhabitants by the early , fueled pronatalist campaigns framing low reproduction as an existential threat to national vitality and military strength. In response, the French government enacted robust pronatalist measures, including the Family Code, which criminalized the dissemination of contraceptives and against family, aiming to reverse what policymakers and demographers described as a "depopulation crisis" through incentives for larger families and penalties for practices deemed obstructive to reproduction. These policies intertwined with moral conservatism, as pronatalists and eugenicists increasingly linked fertility shortfalls to societal "moral decay," portraying non-procreative sexual behaviors, including , as undermining the reproductive imperative essential for racial and national renewal. Interwar discourse amplified 's perceived danger to family structures and , with mass-circulation press and public debates depicting it as a symptom of ethical laxity that exacerbated depopulation by diverting men from heterosexual unions and fatherhood. Though not explicitly criminalized as since the French Revolution's 1791 Penal omitted such prohibitions—unlike in Britain or —homosexual acts faced indirect legal pressures via Article 330 of the Penal , which imposed three months to one year imprisonment for "public offenses against decency," often invoked against visible same-sex conduct amid rising moral panics in urban centers like . Culturally, this natalist fervor clashed with nascent sexological perspectives challenging traditional taboos, as works by figures like Havelock Ellis, whose Studies in the Psychology of Sex (1897 onward) argued that sexual inversion was a natural variation rather than pathology, began infiltrating French intellectual circles and contrasting sharply with entrenched Catholic ethics. The Catholic Church, wielding significant influence in interwar moral debates, upheld condemnations of homosexuality as contrary to natural law and procreation, reinforcing pronatalist narratives that equated sexual nonconformity with threats to social order and demographic survival. This tension between emerging scientific inquiries into sexuality and conservative imperatives set the stage for polemical defenses of homosexuality as compatible with societal health, amid pressures to prioritize reproductive norms for France's postwar recovery.

Composition and Publication

Development of the Dialogues

Gide initiated the composition of Corydon in 1908, focusing initially on the first two Socratic dialogues, which he revised amid personal hesitations and concerns from friends before privately printing a limited edition of 12 copies in 1911. This early version reflected his intent to structure the work as dialogues to systematically interrogate prevailing views on . He subsequently expanded the text to four dialogues during the 1910s and 1920s, iteratively refining arguments through ongoing reflections documented in his journals, which informed the development of subsequent sections without rendering the book autobiographical. In the preface, Gide articulated his purpose as employing the to dismantle societal "prejudices" via rational, evidence-driven discourse—drawing on zoological, historical, and cultural examples—rather than confessional narrative, positioning Corydon as a provocative philosophical defense rather than personal testimony. The taboo subject matter precluded mainstream publishers, prompting Gide to self-finance private printings to circulate drafts among select readers.

Publication Timeline and Editions

The initial publication of Corydon occurred privately and anonymously in limited runs, reflecting André Gide's caution amid societal taboos on the subject matter. In 1911, Gide had the first printed in an edition of just twelve copies, which were distributed discreetly and later stored away without wider circulation. A second private printing followed in 1920, expanding to include the first two dialogues in twenty-one copies, maintaining the anonymous and restricted approach to avoid immediate . The book's full text, comprising four dialogues, appeared in a signed commercial edition in May 1924, published by the Nouvelle Revue Française in , marking its transition from underground circulation to broader availability. This edition totaled 550 copies on verge paper, with additional ordinary copies, and bore Gide's name for the first time, signaling his willingness to claim authorship despite potential repercussions. An English translation by was released in 1950 as the first American edition by Farrar, Straus and Company, including a new by Gide and commentary on the second dialogue by Frank A. Beach. Subsequent reprints, such as those by in 2001 and Farrar, Straus and Giroux editions, have sustained availability, often with updated or annotations by Gide emphasizing his personal stake in the work's defense of its themes. These later versions underscore the book's enduring, if intermittently censored, presence in literary canons.

Structure and Content

Format as Socratic Dialogues

employs a Socratic dialogue format modeled after Plato's philosophical works, featuring conversational exchanges to probe and defend ideas. The protagonist, Corydon—a former medical student with heterodox views—engages skeptics, including an unnamed interlocutor who poses challenges and represents conventional perspectives. This structure draws explicit inspiration from Plato's Symposium, as Corydon references its discussions on love and desire. The book comprises four dialogues that build cumulatively: the first introduces personal motivations, the second examines natural phenomena, the third surveys historical precedents, and the fourth incorporates social observations. Rather than a linear , the format unfolds through dialectical questioning, allowing progressive elaboration without resolving into definitive conclusions. In contrast to Gide's novels, which utilize fictional storytelling to evoke psychological depth, Corydon prioritizes polemical intent via intellectual confrontation, eschewing emotional appeals for rational persuasion. Stylistic elements such as ironic banter and aphoristic pronouncements—evoking figures like and —serve to provoke critical reflection, maintaining an detached, provocative tone suited to controversy.

Summary of Each Dialogue

In the first dialogue, the narrator visits Corydon, a physician who identifies as homosexual, following a trial involving homosexuality that stirs public interest. Corydon recounts personal anecdotes, including a tragic youthful encounter, and outlines his intent to defend homosexuality by emphasizing exemplary cases rather than pathological ones. He invokes ancient Greek standards of male physical beauty and the pedagogical value of pederastic mentorship, portraying it as a refined form of attachment that elevates participants beyond mere procreation. The second dialogue shifts to biological arguments drawn from natural observations. Corydon cites instances of same-sex behavior in species like dogs, goats, and pigeons, contending that such acts persist even when opposite-sex partners are available, thus demonstrating an inherent variability in sexual instincts. He attributes this to nature's overproduction of males, which allows for non-reproductive expressions, and critiques anthropocentric views that deem these behaviors unnatural, referencing philosophers like Montaigne to underscore the role of custom in defining norms. In the third dialogue, Corydon examines historical and artistic evidence from . He analyzes Greek sculpture and literature, arguing that the prominence of male nudes and ephebic ideals reflects a societal preference for as integral to , , and in societies like and Thebes. Extending to and other cultures, he posits that such practices contributed to cultural flourishing by channeling male energies constructively, contrasting this with later suppressions that he links to olfactory and experiential factors in human attraction. The fourth dialogue employs statistical and sociological data from modern contexts. Corydon references elevated rates of homosexual activity in male-only settings such as prisons, barracks, and colonies, estimating figures like one in five prisoners engaging in such acts based on anecdotal and observational reports. He interprets these as revelations of latent under relaxed constraints, advocating for societal recognition to mitigate associated vices like , while maintaining that aligns with natural diversity when not distorted by repression.

Core Arguments

Claims from Nature and Biology

In the second dialogue of Corydon, Gide, through the character Corydon, appeals to empirical observations of animal behavior to argue that homosexuality represents a natural variation rather than a pathology. Corydon cites instances of same-sex mounting among rams, goats, and dogs isolated from females, attributing this to sexual excitement independent of reproductive cycles, as reported by the naturalist Sainte-Claire Deville. Similar behaviors are noted in birds such as pigeons, ducks, and chickens, with pigeons described as particularly prone to such "perversions," drawing on observations by sexologist Havelock Ellis. Extending to invertebrates, Corydon references homosexuality in insects like the cerceris wasp, positing these examples as evidence of widespread non-reproductive sexual expression across species, unconfined to human exceptionalism. Gide rejects the notion that sexuality's sole biological imperative is procreation, asserting instead that drives sexual acts irrespective of fertilization outcomes. In the , Corydon contends that s seek "sexual " primarily, with as an incidental "fluke" rather than the defining purpose, a view extrapolated from animal patterns where same-sex activity persists even when opposite-sex partners are available. He extends this to , framing it as potentially adaptive by fostering and aesthetic appreciation in , akin to non-reproductive bonds in that enhance social cohesion or vigor, though without direct evolutionary mechanisms specified beyond observed persistence. Corydon critiques anthropocentric prejudices that deem acts "unnatural," arguing that such judgments stem from cultural biases rather than objective , as kingdoms exhibit fluid sexual complexities defying strict reproductive norms. Gide implies mirrors this variability, challenging the assumption that female presence invariably suppresses male same-sex urges, and questions observers' convictions as unverified preconceptions rather than rigorous data. These claims position within a broader naturalistic framework, emphasizing empirical anomalies over dogmatic exclusivity.

Historical and Cultural Justifications

In the second dialogue of Corydon, defends by portraying its institutionalized form in as a superior mechanism for moral and intellectual education, where an older male mentor guided a toward virtues like , , and high aspiration. He emphasizes its role in elite warrior and philosophical circles, citing Plato's and the mentorship of with as models of erotic bonds that elevated participants beyond mere physicality to foster civic excellence and personal restraint. Gide argues this structure produced unparalleled cultural achievements, linking pederastic relationships to the formation of exemplary figures and institutions, such as the Theban Sacred Band of 150 pairs, which he claims remained undefeated until their annihilation at the Battle of in 338 BCE due to the unparalleled loyalty inspired by such loves. Gide contrasts Greek pederasty's disciplined, educational spontaneity with Roman variants, which he depicts as emblematic of imperial —marked by , of youths, and detachment from formative societal roles—thus arguing that Rome's excesses corrupted an originally noble practice into one devoid of virtue. He attributes subsequent historical distortions to Christian dominance, asserting that systematically purged or reframed classical texts to vilify homosexual expressions, as evidenced by the suppression of homoerotic elements in surviving manuscripts of Aeschylus's and other works, which obscured pederasty's positive contributions to Greek and . Through these historical appeals, Gide advances a cultural relativist framework, contending that pederasty's endorsement by antiquity's most admired civilizations—evident in its prevalence among Athenian elites during the Periclean era (circa 495–429 BCE) and echoes in —demonstrates its inherent qualitative merits over adult homosexuality or conventional , unburdened by modern moral universals that he views as ahistorical impositions. This recurrence in epochs of peak creativity, Gide maintains, underscores pederasty's alignment with in hierarchical, aspirational societies, rather than as a deviation requiring justification by timeless .

Social and Statistical Evidence

In Corydon, Gide employs observations from North African societies to argue for pederasty's cross-cultural acceptance. Corydon recounts European travelers' perceptions that such practices are normalized there, attributing this to the allure of local adolescent boys, while locals sometimes blame European corruption for similar behaviors among . He further references Gérard de Nerval's Voyages en Orient (1851), describing Egyptian boys dressed as dancing girls who perform seductively, interpreting these as veiled expressions of homosexual customs tolerated in non-Western contexts. Gide draws on purported contemporary from French prisons to bolster claims of homosexuality's prevalence and persistence. He notes reports from medical observers indicating a disproportionate number of "inverts"—effeminate homosexuals—among recidivists, suggesting this reflects not situational deprivation but an inherent drive compelling repeated offenses and returns to environments where such acts are feasible. This statistical pattern, per Corydon, underscores pederasty's role as a fixed resistant to suppression. Gide advances social utility arguments framing as a stabilizer amid demographic pressures. Corydon posits a natural overproduction of males beyond reproductive necessities, advocating non-procreative outlets to avert excesses against women and safeguard familial dignity, akin to models where such practices preserved domestic peace. In an era of rising anxieties, Gide contends this redirection curbs unchecked heterosexual proliferation, channeling virile energies productively—evident in "periods of martial exaltation" tied to homosexual bonds that enhanced military cohesion without undermining fertility rates.

Reception and Initial Controversy

French Public and Critical Response

The publication of Corydon in 1924 elicited immediate and vehement backlash in , with critics accusing the work of advocating moral degeneracy that threatened societal stability amid acute demographic anxieties. Post-World War I grappled with a fertility rate averaging approximately 2.0 children per woman in the , a decline that fueled pronatalist movements decrying depopulation and the erosion of family norms as existential risks to . Gide's explicit defense of as natural was interpreted by opponents as exacerbating these perils by diverting energies from reproduction and traditional heterosexual unions. Responses included limited but pointed public critiques, such as the pamphlet L'Anti-Corydon by physician François Nazier, released in July 1924, which lambasted the dialogues for inverting natural order and promoting vice under philosophical guise. Although no formal legal action ensued—homosexual acts between consenting adults having been decriminalized since the —the book triggered social repercussions, including from segments of polite society and rifts in personal friendships, as associates recoiled from the perceived . Amid the hostility, Gide received backing from select literary confidants; notably, novelist refrained from urging restraint on publication, diverging from peers who implored Gide to suppress the text due to anticipated fallout. This defense underscored a minority view prioritizing intellectual candor over conformity, though it did little to mitigate the broader climate of condemnation.

International Reactions and Translations

The English translation of Corydon, rendered by and published by Farrar, Straus and Company in 1950, elicited mixed responses in the United States, where reviewers acknowledged Gide's literary craftsmanship while decrying the work's advocacy for as outdated and unbalanced. In a New York Times review, critic Gerald Sykes highlighted endorsements from ethologist Frank Beach, who argued that homosexual activities are not biologically abnormal or unnatural, yet faulted Gide for ignoring emerging scientific perspectives linking to emotional immaturity and for diminishing women's societal roles by confining them to domestic or idealized spheres. This reflected broader American cultural tensions in the early era, where literary merit was weighed against moral conservatism, limiting the book's mainstream embrace despite Gide's Nobel stature. In , translations appeared amid post-World War II , which constrained academic and public engagement with Corydon's themes. A German edition, translated by Joachim Moras, was issued by Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt in 1932, predating the war but circulating in a of heightened scrutiny toward non-normative sexualities under lingering authoritarian influences and reconstruction priorities. British reception remained subdued, with no major early editions until a 1983 reprint by the Gay Men's Press in , signaling delayed dissemination in a society governed by laws like the 1885 Labouchere Amendment until partial in 1967. These patterns underscored varying tolerances: U.S. permitted critical literary debate, whereas European conservatism, shaped by wartime traumas and traditional mores, resulted in marginal academic uptake and sporadic private readership rather than widespread controversy or endorsement. Early responses within nascent homosexual advocacy circles viewed Corydon as a pioneering yet imperfect defense, valuing its boldness in challenging taboos through classical and natural arguments but critiquing its emphasis on pederastic relations over consensual adult , which clashed with emerging preferences for egalitarian models. This ambivalence contributed to selective invocation in underground writings, such as Allen Bernstein's pamphlet "Millions of Queers," which referenced Gide's ideas amid defenses of innate variation, though without full endorsement of the text's hierarchical framing. Overall, international dissemination highlighted Corydon's role in sparking localized debates on sexual normality, tempered by cultural and temporal barriers to frank discussion.

Criticisms and Debates

Ethical and Moral Objections

Critics rooted in traditions have argued that , as defended in Corydon, constitutes a grave moral disorder by frustrating the procreative purpose of human sexuality. , in his , classified acts of —including those involving males of any age—as sins against nature, since they deviate from the rational order of oriented toward generation and the preservation of the species within the marital union. This perspective holds that non-procreative sexual relations, regardless of purported mutual affection or educational benefits posited by Gide, inherently misuse the body's teleological design, rendering them ethically illicit and harmful to human flourishing. From religious standpoints, particularly , pederastic relations violate divine commands against unnatural unions, equating them to abominations that corrupt participants and society. Biblical prohibitions in :22 and 20:13, interpreted traditionally as barring male-male intercourse, extend to pederasty's exploitative form, with affirmations in :26-27 decrying such passions as contrary to God's created order. Traditional reinforces this by deeming homosexual acts, including pederastic ones, intrinsically disordered and incapable of moral justification, irrespective of cultural precedents invoked by Gide. Gide's elitist framing in Corydon—portraying as a refined bond between superior males and impressionable youths for aesthetic and formative ends—has drawn rebuke for disregarding the fundamental inequality and in such dynamics. Traditional ethical reasoning emphasizes that adolescents lack the full and rational maturity required for uncoerced in intimate relations, transforming apparent into exploitation where the elder wields over the vulnerable. This contravenes first-principles of reciprocity, treating the younger party as a means to the 's gratification rather than an equal end, thus perpetuating harm under the guise of elevation.

Scientific and Empirical Rebuttals

Modern ethological studies distinguish same-sex sexual behaviors (SSSB) in animals from sexual orientations, attributing many instances to dominance hierarchies, after conflicts, or practice rather than innate equivalent to . For example, mounting behaviors in species like bonobos or often reinforce social bonds or establish rank, not reflecting exclusive same-sex attraction, with longitudinal observations showing most individuals engage flexibly with opposite-sex partners when opportunities arise. This contrasts with Gide's portrayal of animal behaviors as direct analogs for human pederastic relations, as ethologists emphasize contextual functionality over fixed identities, with failed or misdirected s comprising a significant portion mislabeled as "homosexual" in earlier anecdotal reports. Gide's invocation of prison statistics to infer widespread innate prevalence of non-heterosexual behaviors overlooks environmental coercions, as empirical from correctional studies indicate such acts stem from power imbalances and isolation rather than predispositions. Twin studies further undermine claims of high innateness, revealing concordance rates for non-heterosexual orientation as low as 20-52% among monozygotic pairs—far below 100% expected under strict genetic —implying heritability estimates of 30-40% at most, with non-shared environmental factors accounting for the majority of variance. Large-scale genomic analyses corroborate this, finding no single "gay gene" and polygenic influences too weak to predict orientation, reinforcing that situational contexts like s amplify behaviors without evidencing baseline . Regarding historical precedents, Gide's idealization of Greek pederasty as normative ignores its restriction to specific militaristic city-states like and Thebes, where it functioned amid and warrior training, not as a pan-Hellenic or universal practice. Ancient testimonies, such as Philo's critique in De Specialibus Legibus, describe passive participants developing conditioned preferences or enduring impositions, suggesting psychological imprinting akin to trauma from asymmetrical power dynamics, with modern retrospective analyses linking such age-disparate relations to elevated risks of dissociation and relational difficulties in analogous cases. Empirical reviews of classical sources reveal no broad evidence of mutual benefit without , as eromenoi (youths) often originated from lower strata, and vase iconography depicts frequent resistance or instrumental participation tied to rather than innate desire.

Psychological and Societal Harms

, including relations akin to involving adults and adolescent minors, has been linked to elevated risks of long-term psychiatric disorders such as , with meta-analyses indicating odds ratios up to 2.7 for depression among survivors. Substance use disorders also show significantly higher prevalence, with cohort studies reporting 2- to 3-fold increased risks for alcohol and drug dependence in adulthood following such experiences. These outcomes persist across diverse populations, supported by umbrella reviews synthesizing data from thousands of participants, underscoring causal pathways through disrupted neurodevelopment and trauma responses rather than mere correlation. Forensic psychology identifies inherent power imbalances in adult-minor sexual interactions as facilitating grooming processes, where perpetrators systematically build dependency and desensitize victims to exploitation, often masking as mutual affection. This dynamic, involving manipulation of trust and boundaries, aligns with models of that emphasize preparatory behaviors leading to abuse, as detailed in systematic reviews of offender-victim interactions. Gide's advocacy in Corydon for pederastic relations as pedagogically or erotically beneficial overlooks these mechanisms, framing them instead as egalitarian despite the developmental vulnerabilities of adolescents, which associates with heightened revictimization and relational dysfunction in later life. On a societal level, widespread normalization of such practices could amplify burdens, with survivors exhibiting 2- to 4-fold higher utilization of services and elevated rates of interpersonal perpetration, straining familial and communal stability. By prioritizing non-procreative over reproductive pair-bonding, pederastic norms may contribute to demographic pressures, as evidenced by correlations between disrupted formation and declining in contexts of elevated non-heteronormative practices, though direct causation requires further longitudinal scrutiny. These harms extend beyond individuals, potentially eroding incentives for natalist structures essential for population sustainability.

Legacy and Modern Interpretations

Influence on Homosexual Discourse

Corydon contributed to early 20th-century debates on by deploying Socratic dialogues to marshal evidence from and , arguing that pederastic relations between adult men and adolescent boys represented a superior, non-pathological form of distinct from or inversion. This framework challenged contemporaneous sexological tendencies to medicalize as a disorder, positioning it instead as a natural variation observed in animals and human societies. Gide anticipated broader acceptance, predicting within two decades a societal shift toward open , though the text's emphasis on hierarchical, age-disparate eros limited its alignment with emerging egalitarian conceptions. The book's pederastic orientation has resulted in its marginalization within mainstream LGBT historical narratives, which emphasize consensual partnerships and reject asymmetries of power or age as incompatible with modern centered on equality and mutual . Corydon's explicit disavowal of —deemed degenerate or unspiritual—further distanced it from post-World War II homosexual advocacy, which increasingly prioritized comprehensive sexual expression over selective classical ideals. This focus alienated figures and movements oriented toward -oriented normalization, prefiguring post-Stonewall defenses of via empirical and historical appeals yet critiqued for endorsing relations now widely viewed as exploitative. Gide's relativistic stance influenced subsequent thinkers, notably Michel Foucault, whose History of Sexuality series adopted a similar deconstruction of fixed sexual norms through Greco-Roman precedents, rejecting repressive hypotheses in favor of culturally contingent practices. Foucault echoed Gide's admiration for pederasty as a romantic, anti-Christian ideal, though he reframed it within analyses of power and discourse rather than direct advocacy. In sexological circles, Corydon achieved limited traction, overshadowed by Alfred Kinsey's 1948 Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, which quantified homosexual experiences among adults at 37% lifetime incidence via large-scale surveys. Gide referenced Kinsey's findings positively in a 1950 preface to the English edition, viewing them as statistical vindication of homosexuality's prevalence, yet Kinsey's data-driven methodology prioritized behavioral taxonomy over Gide's argumentative naturalism, rendering the latter peripheral to empirical advancements.

Contemporary Critiques and Reassessments

In the post-#MeToo era, Gide's explicit endorsement of in Corydon—framed as a superior form of homosexual relation involving adult men and adolescent boys—has drawn sharp condemnation for disregarding modern understandings of , power dynamics, and long-term psychological harm to minors. Critics argue that such advocacy, rooted in Gide's personal experiences in , exemplifies exploitative predation rather than mutual ethics, rendering the text indefensible under contemporary standards that prioritize informed, equitable agency. This reassessment aligns with broader cultural shifts rejecting historical tolerance for adult-youth sexual contact, viewing Gide's position as incompatible with evidence-based protections against abuse. From a biological standpoint, 21st-century evolutionary analyses challenge Corydon's naturalistic justifications by highlighting homosexuality's reproductive costs, which Gide minimized through anecdotal observations of animal behavior and human societies. Exclusive same-sex attraction represents a Darwinian paradox, as it reduces direct fitness without compensatory mechanisms in most cases, contradicting Gide's portrayal of it as adaptively equivalent or superior to . , in particular, introduces maladaptive risks by diverting youthful participants from reproductive pairing, potentially exacerbating evolutionary dead-ends amid heightened vulnerability to injury or social disruption. These perspectives frame Gide's arguments as pre-scientific speculation, overlooking causal chains from genetic expression to population-level survival. Scholarship since the has systematically critiqued Corydon's empirical foundation, including Gide's inflated claims about homosexuality's prevalence in (e.g., among insects and mammals) and , as products of selective bias and era-specific lacking controlled observation. Ethological studies reveal that purported "homosexual" acts in animals often serve dominance, practice, or affiliative functions rather than fixed orientations, undermining Gide's analogies to human exclusivity. Similarly, his statistical assertions on institutional homosexuality (e.g., in prisons or ) fail modern scrutiny for ignoring confounders like or transient behavior, positioning the book as ideological advocacy rather than evidence-driven inquiry. This reassessment underscores systemic flaws in early 20th-century sources, prioritizing causal realism over romanticized defenses.

References

  1. https://www.greek-love.com/media/PDFs/Gide.Corydon.pdf
  2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1dszwzx
  3. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/gide-publishes-signed-edition-corydon
  4. http://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/nyt1950/ki1
  5. https://www.greek-love.com/index.php/near-east-north-africa/tunisia/initiation-andre-gide-pederasty
  6. https://library.syracuse.edu/digital/guides/g/gide_a.htm
  7. https://samfergusonresearch.com/lectures-on-andre-gide/andre-gide-lecture-2/
  8. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200949002500102
  9. https://d-nb.info/1243181974/34
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6434651/
  11. https://shs.cairn.info/journal-population-2009-3-page-477?lang=en
  12. https://utppublishing.com/doi/pdf/10.3138/cbmh.29.2.373
  13. https://chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7208/chicago/9780226389288.001.0001/upso-9780226389257-chapter-2
  14. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1203&context=younghistorians
  15. https://academic.oup.com/book/2094/chapter/142021297
  16. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Havelock-Ellis
  17. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/samesex-relations-and-the-catholic-church-how-law-and-doctrine-have-evolved-18202020/28A43404A35BDC1E3E4052CFD26CA5AD
  18. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v20/n24/edmund-white/on-the-chance-that-a-shepherd-boy
  19. https://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/nyt1950
  20. https://www.goodreads.com/work/editions/1431201-corydon
  21. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7221&context=dissertations
  22. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/12208907.pdf
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41211844
  24. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780791481998-003/html
  25. https://www.nytimes.com/1950/01/29/archives/gide-on-love-and-life.html
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/286642
  27. https://shs.cairn.info/journal-population-2023-2-page-207?lang=en
  28. https://www.altersexualite.com/spip.php?article706
  29. https://www.cerisepress.com/05/13/wilful-blindness-the-marriage-of-andre-and-madeleine-gide/5
  30. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780822385493-033/html
  31. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL26418918M/Corydon
  32. https://glreview.org/article/millions-of-queers-a-view-from-1940/
  33. http://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/1940-defense/bio-bernstein
  34. https://www.lakeforest.edu/news/homosexuality-in-animals-an-analysis-of-sexual-behavior-theories
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10547684/
  36. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/ptpbio/16039257.0011.022/--in-defence-of-animal-homosexuality?c=ptb%3Bc=ptpbio%3Bg=ptpbiog%3Brgn=main%3Bview=fulltext%3Bxc=1%3Bq1=Article
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11058483/
  38. https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2019/09/57342/
  39. https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/35799/how-significant-is-the-genetic-component-of-homosexual-behaviour
  40. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/there-is-no-gay-gene-there-is-no-straight-gene-sexuality-is-just-complex-study-confirms
  41. https://soar.suny.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.12648/14625/3911_sasha.ray.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  42. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/l30bpe/nsfw_what_psychological_impact_did_pederasty_have/
  43. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/hic3.12435
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015702/
  45. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/481660
  46. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.771511/full
  47. https://victimsofcrime.org/grooming-dynamic/
  48. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1068&context=jswgc
  49. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43545-024-00852-6
  50. https://bravehearts.org.au/research-lobbying/stats-facts/the-impact-of-child-sexual-abuse/
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799268/
  52. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/25500/1004595.pdf
  53. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/459753/summary
  54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/374839
  55. https://thecritic.co.uk/issues/april-2021/michel-foucault-the-prophet-of-pederasty/
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1447862/
  57. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/pdf/10.3828/cfc.2011.35.1.3
  58. https://newcriterion.com/article/gides-judgment/
  59. https://france-amerique.com/talent-is-no-longer-an-excuse-for-crime/
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306987702003638
  61. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/190987/scientists-explore-evolution-animal-homosexuality/
  62. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780822372592-006/html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.