Hubbry Logo
Cravath SystemCravath SystemMain
Open search
Cravath System
Community hub
Cravath System
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cravath System
Cravath System
Cravath System
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Cravath System is a set of business management principles first developed at Cravath, Swaine & Moore.

John Oller, author of White Shoe, credits Paul Drennan Cravath with creating the model in the early 20th century, which was adopted by virtually all white-shoe law firms, fifty years before the phrase white shoe came into popular use.[1] The Cravath System has been adopted by many leading law firms,[2][3] management consulting firms, and investment banks in the United States.

Components

[edit]

Paul Cravath built a reputation handling complex lawsuits for the new electrical industry. Devising the Cravath System, he enlarged the law office and professionalised it by establishing full-time librarians, a recruiting system focused solely on the highest-ranked law schools, and partners who specialized.[4] Robert Swaine describes the fundamentals of the Cravath System in the beginning of "Volume II The Cravath Firm since 1906" of the The Cravath Firm and Its Predecessors, 1819-1947.[5] These include:

Recruiting staff
Paul Cravath sought to hire only the "best of the best" and recruited primarily from the law schools of Harvard, Yale, and Columbia. Graduates were expected to be members of the Phi Beta Kappa/Beta Gamma Sigma system, and to have served as editors of their respective school's law review. A graduate from a university outside of the top five was expected to be, at a minimum, the equivalent of a "B" student at Harvard or Columbia over time. Distinctly, only new law graduates or those who had served as clerks after law school were to be hired, except in rare circumstances, to avoid previously developed habits, outside the Cravath System, coming to the firm's culture.
Training staff
Associates would be assigned to a partner (typically for up to 18 months). Associates would learn to break down large tasks into manageable pieces to lead. The view was that each associate would serve as an apprentice of a partner's practice, training under close supervision and guidance.
Compensation
The system practices lockstep compensation. Early practices at law firms paid associates nothing except what they could bring in for themselves. By 1910, Cravath was one of the first to hire incoming lawyers on a salary. Since Cravath preferred to hire the best and remunerate them very well, this led to wide disparities in starting salaries in the legal industry. Collusion among law firms and schools led to uniform starting salaries across law firms from the end of World War I until World War II, but this stopped once the top law firms salaries reached parity soon after.
Tenure
Generally, only partners may have permanent employment at the firm. As long as an associate was deemed worthy of promotion, they may stay. Associates who were not suitable for promotion were dismissed in a strictly enforced "up or out" staffing policy.
Choosing partners
Unless there is some exceptional need for expertise unavailable within the firm, partners should be chosen and promoted only from within the office.
Interests outside the firm
Partners and associates may not have business interests outside the firm. Charitable, educational and artistic interests are permitted with permission from the senior partner. There are no part time associates and partners, and all business in the office is company business and not individual.
Relationships of the partners
Partners are expected to work with each other; silos and cliques are to be strictly avoided so as to foster trust and a firmwide esprit de corps.
Scope of the practice
Cravath handled predominantly civil law matters in the early years; the majority of firms adopting this system are also civil law firms.[6]
Management
Cravath believed that a firm must have strong executive direction, led by the senior partner who was elected by the partnership for a limited term.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cravath System

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Cravath System is a pioneering and organizational model developed at the LLP, centered on recruiting elite graduates, providing intensive supervised training through rotations across diverse practice areas, promoting partners exclusively from within, and cultivating a collaborative environment that prioritizes client service and long-term relationships. Introduced in the early 1900s by Paul D. Cravath, the firm's namesake leader from 1906 to 1940, the system revolutionized American legal practice by shifting from hiring to a structured, merit-based approach that emphasized breadth of experience, ethical objectivity, and team-oriented work over individual competition. At its core, the Cravath System relies on the rotation mechanism, which assigns associates—typically hired directly after or judicial clerkships—to work under senior partners across various departments, such as corporate, litigation, or tax, typically lasting 15 to 18 months. This process ensures associates gain comprehensive exposure to complex legal challenges, develop versatile skills, and receive consistent , while eliminating internal rivalries for assignments or clients. Compensation is competitive and salaried for all associates, with annual increases tied to performance, and tenure is generally capped at 6 to 10 years unless advancement to occurs, maintaining a lean, high-caliber workforce focused on civil without external interests or fee-splitting. The system's influence extends beyond Cravath, serving as a blueprint for modern large firms and organizations, though few have replicated its full integration of hiring, , and governance. Paul Cravath's philosophy, detailed in the firm's 1948 by T. Swaine, stressed recruiting from top institutions like Harvard, Yale, and Columbia—prioritizing academic excellence and experience—and fostering a culture of disciplined, apolitical advice to corporate clients. Today, the model endures at Cravath, adapting to contemporary demands while preserving its emphasis on internal promotion and collaborative innovation.

History and Origins

Development at Cravath, Swaine & Moore

Cravath, Swaine & Moore traces its origins to March 22, 1819, when Richard Blatchford established a law office at 140 Water Street in , initially focusing on maritime and commercial matters. The firm, through various partnerships and name changes, evolved amid the post-Civil War business expansion, but it underwent a significant reorganization starting in 1906 under Paul D. Cravath's leadership, which formalized its operations and laid the groundwork for handling large-scale corporate transactions. This restructuring shifted the firm from a smaller, general practice to a specialized entity capable of supporting industrial growth, including reorganizations like that of following the Panic of 1907. In the , the firm introduced structured associate hiring and training, recruiting top graduates into a formalized system that replaced partnerships with merit-based progression and intensive mentorship. This approach emphasized broad exposure to practice areas through rotations, enabling associates to develop expertise in complex while ensuring the firm's scalability. By prioritizing recent graduates from elite institutions, the system aimed to build a deep bench of talent committed to long-term firm loyalty. The firm's expansion during , when it advised on wartime financing and international transactions, and the economic boom of the , which spurred mergers and regulatory work, highlighted the need for the system's flexibility in managing larger teams and intricate deals. By the mid-1920s, the firm had grown significantly, handling high-stakes corporate matters with a structured model essential for efficiency amid rising demand.

Key Figures and Influences

Paul D. Cravath (1861–1940), a leading , served as the primary architect of the Cravath System, revolutionizing organization in the early . With a background in handling high-stakes corporate matters, including representations in electrification disputes and railroad reorganizations, Cravath joined the predecessor firm to in 1899 at age 37. He assumed the role of Presiding Partner in 1906, a position he held until 1940, during which he formalized a philosophy centered on recruiting elite law graduates from institutions like Harvard, Yale, and Columbia, providing rigorous , and advancing personnel strictly on merit to cultivate specialized expertise. This approach aimed to create a self-perpetuating talent pipeline, ensuring the firm could scale to meet the complexities of modern corporate practice while fostering loyalty and collaboration among lawyers. Robert T. Swaine (1886–1947), who joined the firm in 1910 and became a name partner, was instrumental in refining the Cravath System during the , a period of rapid firm expansion driven by economic prosperity. Swaine oversaw the institutionalization of key practices, such as the introduction of weekly partner meetings around to enhance and , and contributed to the growing emphasis on departmental specialization amid increasing client demands for financial and . Other early partners, including Max Henderson and George de Gersdorff, collaborated closely with Cravath to operationalize these refinements, helping the firm navigate post-World War I competition for top talent by standardizing salaries and recruitment criteria by the mid-. Swaine later documented these developments in his comprehensive three-volume firm history, The Cravath Firm and Its Predecessors, 1819–1948 (1946–1948), which underscores the system's evolution as a response to national business growth. The Cravath System emerged amid broader external influences, particularly the Industrial Revolution's transformation of American commerce, which generated unprecedented demand for sophisticated corporate legal services in areas like mergers, financing, and . Cravath envisioned law firms evolving in tandem with industrial-scale enterprises, building internal depth to handle intricate transactions that solo practitioners or small partnerships could not. The firm's expansion during economic booms of the and validated this vision, as rising corporate activity necessitated a merit-driven model to attract and retain high-caliber professionals.

Core Principles

Hiring and Recruitment Practices

The Cravath System's hiring practices centered on the exclusive recruitment of recent graduates from elite law schools, prioritizing those with top academic rankings to ensure a high-caliber talent pool. By 1948, approximately 67.7% of all lawyers hired by the firm had graduated from Harvard, Yale, or Columbia Law Schools, reflecting Paul Cravath's early 20th-century strategy to source candidates with strong liberal arts backgrounds and disciplined legal aptitude, using grades as an initial screening mechanism. This selective approach aimed to build a foundation of exceptional raw talent rather than experienced practitioners, fostering long-term development within the firm. Recruitment emphasized candidates' potential for sustained loyalty and firm integration over prior professional experience, with interviews designed to evaluate personal qualities such as , honesty, industry, and collaborative aptitude. Paul Cravath specifically sought individuals who demonstrated potential and a commitment to the firm's collaborative , viewing these traits as essential for in the intensive model. Low attrition rates were incentivized through promises of rigorous and substantial rewards, aligning hires with the system's expectation of lifelong dedication. Historically, these practices evolved from informal personal recommendations in the 1910s, when Cravath personally vetted promising young graduates, to formalized campus recruiting programs by the 1950s, enabling broader yet still highly selective outreach to top institutions. This shift supported the firm's growth while maintaining rigorous standards. To preserve cultural uniformity and internal development, the system rejected lateral hires at the associate level, relying almost entirely on entry-level recruits to populate the ranks.

Training and Rotation System

The Cravath System's training and rotation framework emphasizes the development of versatile lawyers through systematic exposure to diverse legal disciplines, enabling associates to acquire broad expertise rather than early specialization. Associates participate in mandatory rotations across key practice areas, including litigation, corporate transactions, and antitrust matters, which immerse them in the , procedural nuances, and client dynamics of each field. This structured approach, originating in the early , ensures that junior lawyers gain a comprehensive understanding of firm operations while learning skills in , , and relationship . Central to the system is an model, under which associates work directly alongside partners on actual client matters, beginning with close observation and gradually assuming greater responsibility as their proficiency grows. This hands-on method, designed to produce "a better faster," prioritizes real-world application over theoretical instruction, allowing juniors to contribute meaningfully to complex cases while receiving personalized guidance. By assigning associates to small teams led by experienced partners, the model promotes incremental skill-building and minimizes competition for assignments, fostering a collaborative environment where knowledge is shared across the firm. Introduced in the as a formalized component of , the system incorporated regular internal training sessions conducted by partners to reinforce practical learning and address emerging legal trends. These elements, combined with the rotation structure, expose associates to the full spectrum of firm activities, cultivating a sense of unity and discouraging isolated departmental silos. The overarching goal is to create adaptable, client-focused attorneys equipped for long-term contributions to high-stakes corporate and litigation work, thereby enhancing overall firm performance and innovation.

Promotion and Partnership Model

The promotion and partnership model of the Cravath System embodies a rigorous, merit-driven "up-or-out" policy, under which associates are expected to advance to partnership within approximately 7-10 years based on sustained high performance or be encouraged to seek opportunities elsewhere. This approach ensures a continuous pipeline of internal talent while maintaining the firm's selectivity and collaborative culture, with no guarantees of long-term tenure for underperformers. Historically, this model took shape in the under Paul D. Cravath's leadership, as the firm shifted toward systematic internal development following , with formal affirmations of the policy by 1916 emphasizing promotions solely from associate ranks. By the mid-1920s, the system had matured, with the first significant cohort of partners admitted around 1925-1926, typically after 5-6 years of associate experience, marking the initial full implementation of merit-based elevation from within. This timeline reflected Cravath's vision of building firm depth through deliberate talent incubation rather than hiring. Promotion decisions hinge on comprehensive performance evaluations, assessing factors such as technical competence in handling complex legal tasks, sound judgment in client matters, demonstrated through effective , and the ability to earn client confidence—without reliance on external . These criteria, informed in part by associates' experiences during departmental rotations, prioritize contributions to firm-wide excellence and cultural fit over isolated metrics, ensuring partners embody the system's collaborative ethos. To safeguard the internal talent pipeline, the model strictly prohibits lateral hires into , with only rare exceptions over decades—such as three instances in the first four decades for specialized expertise—reinforcing the commitment to grooming leaders exclusively from entry-level recruits. This exclusivity has sustained the firm's reputation for meritocracy and institutional loyalty since its early adoption.

Implementation in Practice

Associate Development and Mentorship

In the Cravath System, associate development emphasizes hands-on, personalized guidance from partners to foster rapid professional growth. Partners provide one-on-one mentorship through regular interactions, such as reviewing drafts and explaining strategic decisions, which helps associates understand not only the substance of legal work but also its broader application. This approach includes structured feedback sessions where partners debrief associates on completed tasks, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement to accelerate learning and build confidence in complex matters. The formal partner mentor program, initiated in the second year of associateship, pairs each associate with a dedicated partner for ongoing advice and support, ensuring consistent guidance throughout their tenure. A key aspect of associate development involves integrating and transactional work to cultivate both ethical awareness and practical expertise. assignments, treated as core firm work with full partner supervision, allow associates to handle sophisticated cases that mirror paying client matters, thereby honing s in client counseling, , and while contributing to causes. Similarly, exposure to transactional practice—such as mergers, acquisitions, and securities offerings—through supervised assignments builds proficiency in drafting, , and deal structuring, reinforcing the ethical imperative of thorough, client-focused representation. These opportunities are encouraged from the outset, enabling associates to develop a well-rounded set that balances technical competence with . The firm supports associate growth through extensive resources, including a comprehensive for and in-house continuing (CLE) programs. The provides access to vast legal materials, aiding associates in independent research and preparation for assignments. CLE offerings, delivered through regular classes and workshops, cover , practice skills, and topics, ensuring associates remain current in evolving legal landscapes. These resources, combined with the Associate Advisor Program for new hires, create a supportive infrastructure that prioritizes sustained learning. Central to the Cravath System's mentorship philosophy is an emphasis on work quality over quantity, with mechanisms to prevent over-assignment and promote balanced development. The rotation system, which exposes associates to varied practice areas, distributes workloads evenly among teams, eliminating internal competition for assignments and allowing focus on high-caliber work under partner oversight. Partners monitor both the substance and volume of an associate's contributions, prioritizing excellence in output while maintaining reasonable expectations for relative to peer firms. This protective structure, rooted in the system's collaborative ethos, safeguards associate well-being and ensures that development occurs through meaningful, supervised experiences rather than excessive demands.

Partner Compensation and Governance

The Cravath System implemented a compensation model for partners from 1976 to 2021, in which all new partners started at the same base pay upon admission and received annual increases based solely on years of seniority within the . This egalitarian approach ensured that compensation was tied to tenure rather than individual performance or client origination, fostering a collaborative environment among partners. In 2021, the firm shifted to a modified system that allows for higher compensation for top performers while preserving elements of seniority-based pay. Promotion to partner marked entry into this structure, where associates who demonstrated exceptional merit advanced to share equally in the firm's profits according to their class year. The model for partners was adopted in the 1920s as part of the broader Cravath System's evolution under Paul D. Cravath, aiming to promote internal equality and minimize destructive competition by aligning incentives with collective firm success rather than personal gain. Prior to formalizing pure in 1976, the firm used a modified version during Cravath's leadership in the early , which emphasized seniority while allowing minor adjustments, reflecting the system's roots in reducing rivalry and building long-term loyalty. In 2023, Cravath introduced a non-equity partner tier for salaried partners who do not share in profits. Governance under the Cravath System relied on collective through regular partnership meetings, where partners jointly deliberated on key matters such as firm , acceptance of new clients, and promotions of associates to maintain the merit-based up-or-out policy. This democratic process, led by an elected senior partner for limited terms, ensured broad consensus and alignment with the firm's collaborative ethos. To uphold focus on firm priorities and avoid conflicts of , governance rules in the Cravath System prohibited partners from holding individual equity ownership in outside businesses or entities, reinforcing the partnership's undivided commitment to client service and internal cohesion.

Influence and Legacy

Adoption by Other Law Firms

The Cravath System began influencing peer firms in as early as the 1910s, when other large offices adopted its core principles of hiring top graduates and standardizing associate salaries to curb competitive bidding wars. By , elite firms such as and & Wardwell had emulated key elements, including the associate rotation for broad training and the up-or-out promotion model, which emphasized merit-based advancement to without lateral hires. These adaptations helped these WASP-dominated firms maintain their aristocratic structures while scaling operations amid growing corporate demands. Following , the system spread more broadly among "white shoe" firms, becoming the predominant organizational model for large corporate practices by the early . This era saw its replication in both established WASP firms and emerging Jewish-led ones, which modified the framework by prioritizing aggressive meritocracy over cultural exclusivity, leading to rapid growth—such as expanding from 20 lawyers in 1945 to over 100 by the mid-1960s. , founded in 1946 after a split from Root, , Buckner & Ballantine, partially implemented the system in the late , incorporating and up-or-out elements while blending with a mixed client base, which facilitated its ascent among top-tier firms. Internationally, U.S. firms exported the Cravath System during their expansion into starting in the 1970s, driven by multinational client needs and transnational finance. Adaptations included adjustments for U.K. regulations, such as separating solicitor and roles, while retaining core hiring and training practices; for instance, & Wardwell and opened or scaled offices around 1973, applying modified versions to train U.S.-qualified lawyers alongside local hires. This diffusion reinforced the system's role in shaping global Big Law structures, though with variations to accommodate local bar restrictions. The Cravath System significantly elevated the prestige of large law firms, positioning them as the elite providers of corporate legal services during the mid-20th century. By the early 1950s, the system's emphasis on rigorous training and merit-based advancement had become the predominant organizational model for major firms, fostering a reputation for sophistication and reliability that attracted high-profile corporate clients amid postwar economic expansion. This prestige shift encouraged corporations to increasingly rely on these large firms for complex transactions, rather than smaller or general practices, solidifying their dominance in corporate law by the 1950s. The system's influence extended to legal education, where elite law schools adapted their curricula and recruitment pipelines to meet the demands of Cravath-style training. Firms' preference for graduates from top institutions like Harvard and Yale created a symbiotic relationship, with schools emphasizing practical skills in and business-oriented courses to prepare students for the intensive, collaborative firm environment. This alignment raised professional standards across academia, as law schools sought to maintain their feeder status to prestigious firms, thereby shaping the content of legal training nationwide. A key legacy of the Cravath System was the standardization of associate roles, which contributed to the pyramid structure characteristic of modern Big Law. The model's hierarchical setup—with a narrow base of partners overseeing a broader tier of associates on fixed salaries and an "up-or-out" promotion track—became the norm, promoting efficiency and specialized supervision while limiting independent client development by juniors. This structure, established in the early 1900s and widely emulated, enabled firms to scale operations for growing corporate needs, embedding a tournament-style into the that persists in large practices today. In the long term, the Cravath System's principles facilitated higher billing rates and deeper specialization trends, particularly following the wave of firm mergers in the . As firms expanded through consolidation, the emphasis on trained associates handling high-volume work supported elevated hourly rates, with partners leveraging specialized teams for complex deals in areas like . This evolution reinforced a shift toward within Big Law, where expertise in niche fields became a competitive edge, driving industry-wide norms for premium pricing and focused practice groups.

Criticisms and Modern Adaptations

Key Challenges and Criticisms

The Cravath System's hiring practices have faced significant criticism for perpetuating a lack of diversity, particularly in its historical preference for white male graduates from institutions such as Harvard, Yale, and Columbia. Between 1950 and 1965, approximately 73% of lawyers hired by large firms, which emulated the Cravath model, attended these elite schools, reflecting a that excluded candidates based on , , and . This favoritism embedded a WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant) ethos in the system, with Jewish graduates often hired as associates but rarely promoted to until after 1945, and broader diversity gains, including for women and minorities, occurring only slowly through the 1980s and into the 1990s. By the mid-1980s, traditional Cravath-style firms began regular hiring and promotion of Jewish and Catholic attorneys, marking a shift away from their predominantly Protestant identity, though systemic barriers persisted for non-elite candidates. The up-or-out promotion model central to the Cravath System has been critiqued for fostering high attrition rates, burnout, and mental health challenges among associates. With only about 1 in 12 associates typically advancing to partnership, the intense competition and pressure to perform—often involving 1,900 to 2,000+ annual billable hours—contribute to elevated turnover, with 44% of associates leaving within three years and 75% within five. This structure exacerbates isolation, low autonomy for juniors, and distress, leading to higher incidences of depression, anxiety, and substance abuse, with mental health and addiction issues accounting for a notable portion of lawyer attrition. Recognition of these problems dates to the mid-1970s, when lawyer assistance programs emerged to address substance abuse and emotional distress in the profession, highlighting the human costs of the system's rigorous demands. Critics have also highlighted the Cravath System's resistance to lateral hires as a barrier to infusing mid-career talent and fostering . By prioritizing the recruitment and internal training of recent graduates, the model deliberately avoided mid-level or senior laterals to preserve clear advancement paths and prevent the importation of external habits, enforcing an up-or-out timeline where non-promoted associates typically departed after six years. This inward focus limited the influx of diverse expertise and perspectives, potentially stifling adaptability in a changing legal market, as firms relied heavily on homegrown lawyers rather than integrating experienced professionals from competitors. In contrast to modern practices that embrace aggressive lateral hiring for , the traditional system's rigidity constrained until client-driven shifts in the 1980s prompted broader adoption. Economically, the Cravath System has been faulted for contributing to the escalation of legal fees during the leveraged buyout era, as firms increased leverage ratios and demands to capitalize on surging merger and acquisition work. The period's takeover boom drove demand for , prompting Cravath-style firms to expand associate headcounts relative to partners—ratios rising to around 2.59 in slower-growth firms—thereby amplifying and profitability through higher hourly rates. Partners' climbed from 1,538 in 1985 to over 1,700 by the early , reflecting intensified pressure that passed costs onto clients amid the era's complex transactions. This leverage-driven model, while boosting firm revenues, drew scrutiny for inflating legal expenses during a time of heightened and deal volume.

Evolution in Contemporary Firms

In response to growing demands for inclusivity in the , firms adhering to the Cravath System have introduced diversity initiatives since the 2010s, including targeted recruiting from underrepresented law schools such as (HBCUs). For instance, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP actively recruits from institutions like , participating in on-campus interviews and diversity job fairs to broaden its talent pool beyond traditional elite schools. These efforts aim to reflect the demographic diversity of the broader legal community, with Cravath reporting recruitment from multiple HBCUs to support retention of underrepresented associates at rates comparable to the overall firm population. The prompted adaptations to the system, incorporating hybrid work arrangements and enhanced technology to maintain associate development in a distributed environment. Cravath converted its summer associate program to a fully remote format, ensuring hands-on exposure through virtual across practice areas, a model that influenced permanent hybrid policies allowing associates flexible office and remote schedules post-2021, with a current requirement of three days in-office per week (Tuesday, Wednesday, and one additional day). Firms following the Cravath model, such as those in Big Law, have integrated e-discovery tools, AI-driven platforms, and virtual collaboration software into , enabling associates to gain practical skills in remote settings while preserving the system's emphasis on broad exposure. Some successor firms to the Cravath System have partially shifted from strict partner compensation toward performance-based elements, responding to competitive pressures in talent retention and client demands. While Cravath itself retained a collaborative core, it modified its model in 2021 to include limited adjustments for individual contributions, such as , without fully abandoning . Other adopting firms, like those in the AmLaw 100, have introduced hybrid compensation blending with merit bonuses, diverging from the original system's uniformity to incentivize high performers in specialized practices. Cravath implemented scale adjustments in 2021 to accommodate its expanding global practices, raising first-year associate salaries to $205,000, with the scale increasing to $225,000 for first-year associates as of 2025 while upholding the Cravath System's foundational principles of and up-or-out promotion. These changes supported operations in international offices, such as , by aligning compensation with global market standards and facilitating cross-border rotations without altering the model's emphasis on comprehensive training. This evolution allows the system to remain viable in a multinational context, prioritizing adaptability over rigid tradition.

References

  1. https://www.cravath.com/the-cravath-system/index.html
  2. https://houseofrussell.com/american-legal-history/docs/robert-taylor-swaine-the.pdf
  3. https://www.cravath.com/the-cravath-system/the-system-s-history.html
  4. https://www.cravath.com/careers/legal-hiring/professional-development/the-rotation-system.html
  5. https://www.cravath.com/careers/legal-hiring/professional-development/rotations-in-practice.html
  6. https://www.cravath.com/careers/legal-hiring/recruiting/faq.html
  7. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2838&context=flr
  8. https://www.cravath.com/our-story/index.html
  9. https://200.cravath.com/the-gilded-age/
  10. https://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/cravath-swaine-moore
  11. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/235515757.pdf
  12. https://journals.law.harvard.edu/ilj/wp-content/uploads/sites/84/61.2-Wilkins.pdf
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227966856_Paul_D_Cravath_The_First_World_War_and_the_Anglophile_Internationalist_Tradition
  14. https://www.legalevolution.org/2022/06/the-original-gilded-age-lawyers-312/
  15. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116&context=facpub
  16. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1062&context=mbelr
  17. https://www.legalevolution.org/2020/08/lawyers-and-teamwork-part-ii-training-190/
  18. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3593&context=facpub
  19. https://www.cravath.com/a/web/i2zPqnTLmx47Bb6tDps8Cp/8zeSY8/cravath-talent-development-reprint.pdf
  20. https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2010/04/GalanterHenderson.pdf
  21. https://www.cravath.com/careers/legal-hiring/professional-development/mentoring-training.html
  22. https://legacy.vault.com/company-profiles/law/cravath-swaine-moore-llp/company-associate-reviews
  23. https://www.cravath.com/pro-bono/index.html
  24. https://www.cravath.com/pro-bono/associate-perspectives.html
  25. https://legacy.vault.com/company-profiles/law/cravath-swaine-moore-llp/why-work-here-benefits/your-career-1
  26. https://www.chambers-associate.com/career-moves/career-moves-lateral-look/lateral-look-cravath
  27. https://www.bcgsearch.com/article/900056182/The-Most-Prestigious-and-HighestPerforming-Law-Firms-in-the-United-States--Exceptional-Compensation-Unparalleled-Career-Opportunities-and-MarketLeading-Prestige/
  28. https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/92/Cravath-Swaine-Moore.html
  29. https://adamsmithesq.com/2018/05/the-death-of-lockstep/
  30. https://www.businessinsider.com/cravath-is-scrapping-its-partner-lockstep-read-the-memo-2021-12
  31. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/evolution-partner-compensation-big-law-firms-ishan-gill-5kykc
  32. https://abovethelaw.com/2023/11/cravath-cracks-on-non-equity-partnerships/
  33. https://www.nalp.org/uploads/PDQuarterly_uploads/Feb2017PDQ_Henderson.pdf
  34. https://www.legalevolution.org/2022/10/learning-about-law-firms-why-confederation-is-our-default-model-332/
  35. https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2010/04/Wald.pdf
  36. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09695950902804217
  37. https://confluence.gallatin.nyu.edu/context/independent-project/on-big-law
  38. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3581&context=facpub
  39. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/context/facpub/article/3330/viewcontent/Capitalizing_On_Healthy_Lawyers__The_Business_Case_For_Law_Firms.pdf
  40. http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2010/04/GalanterHenderson.pdf
  41. https://media2.vault.com/14346533/cravath-swaine-_-moore-llp-diversity-report-w_ads.pdf
  42. https://www.law.com/dailyreportonline/2020/05/20/summer-associate-programs-and-covid-19-how-law-firms-are-responding/
  43. https://www.chambers-associate.com/law-firms/worklife-and-benefits/
  44. https://www.bloomberglaw.com/external/document/X75AG22G000000/legal-profession-professional-perspective-training-associates-in
  45. https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/cravath-abandons-strict-lockstep-compensation-for-partners
  46. https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2021/06/17/cravath-matches-starting-associate-pay-offering-205k-for-first-years/
  47. https://www.cravath.com/careers/legal-hiring/recruiting/how-to-apply.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.