Community hub
0 subscribers8 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Crescograph.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Crescograph
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
A crescograph is a device for measuring growth in plants. It was invented in the early 20th century by Jagadish Chandra Bose.
The Bose crescograph uses a series of clockwork gears and a smoked glass plate to record the movement of the tip of a plant (or its roots). It was able to record at magnifications of up to 10,000 times through the use of two different levers. One lever records at 100 times magnification while the other lever takes that image and records at another 100 times magnification.[1] Marks are made on the plate at intervals of a few seconds, demonstrating how the rate of growth varies under varying stimuli. Bose experimented with temperature, chemicals, gases, and electricity.[2]
The electronic crescograph plant movement detector is capable of measurements as small as 1/1,000,000 of an inch. However, its normal operating range is from 1/1000 to 1/10,000 of an inch. The component which actually measures the movement is a differential transformer along with a movable core hinged between two points. A micrometer is used to adjust and calibrate the system. It can record plant growth, magnifying a small movement as much as 10,000,000 times. This machine is highly sensitive; Bose padded the legs of the table on which the Crescograph is being used with India-rubber sponges. This negated any vibration which could affect results.[3]
References
[edit]- ^ Chunder Bose, Jagadis; Das, Guruprasanna (1919-02-17). "Researches on growth and movement in plants by means of the high magnification crescograph". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character. 90 (631): 364–400. Bibcode:1919RSPSB..90..364C. doi:10.1098/rspb.1919.0001. ISSN 0950-1193.
- ^ "Jagadis Bose Research on Measurement of Plant Growth (reproductions of Bose Research Institute books from the Hanscom AFB Geophysical Research Library)". Retrieved April 27, 2007.
- ^ Bose, Jagadis Chandra (July 15, 1920). "Researches on Growth of Plants". Nature. 105 (2646): 615–617. doi:10.1038/105615a0. S2CID 4223139.
Crescograph
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
History
Invention and Early Development
Jagadish Chandra Bose, initially trained as a physicist, joined Presidency College in Calcutta as a professor of physical science in 1885 following his education at the University of London and Christ's College, Cambridge. Motivated by a desire to bridge physics and biology, Bose sought to prove that plants exhibit sensitivity to stimuli akin to animal responses, applying quantitative physical methods to what was then considered a qualitative biological domain. This transition was driven by his observations of electrical and mechanical responses in both living tissues and inorganic matter, leading him to explore plant irritability during the late 1890s.[3][2] Conceptualized amid Bose's ongoing research at Presidency College in the 1890s, the crescograph addressed the limitations of existing tools for studying plant growth. By 1901, Bose had constructed the first functional prototype, a device capable of magnifying minute pulsations and elongations in plant tissues up to 10,000 times, enabling precise recordings of responses to environmental factors. This invention marked a pivotal advancement in his biophysical investigations, allowing empirical demonstration of plant "nervous" mechanisms.[2][4] The development faced significant technical hurdles, as no commercial instruments could reliably detect the sub-millimeter movements characteristic of plant growth rates, often as slow as 1 mm per hour. Bose overcame this by engineering a mechanical amplifier incorporating a stylus attached to the plant, linked through a system of levers to a rotating drum with smoked glass for tracing amplified traces. Committed to open scientific progress, Bose refrained from patenting the crescograph, ensuring its accessibility to researchers worldwide. The instrument's principles and initial applications were detailed in his seminal 1902 publication, Response in the Living and Non-Living, which synthesized his early findings on responsive phenomena across living and non-living systems.[2][5][6]Key Demonstrations and Recognition
In 1901, Jagadish Chandra Bose conducted a landmark demonstration at the Royal Institution in London on May 10, showcasing the crescograph's ability to record real-time plant growth and responses to stimuli in unprecedented detail.[7] The event, attended by prominent scientists including Lord Rayleigh, featured projections of pulsatile movements in plants such as the sensitive mimosa, revealing rhythmic contractions and expansions analogous to animal tissue responses under stress like electric shocks or poisons.[8] This public exhibition highlighted the instrument's magnification to capture minute pulsations, drawing widespread attention to the dynamic nature of plant physiology.[7] Building on this success, Bose presented further findings at a lecture to the Linnean Society in March 1902, where he displayed tracings from his instruments illustrating plant "fatigue" after repeated stimulation and subsequent recovery periods.[9] These demonstrations emphasized electrical and mechanical responses in plant tissues, reinforcing parallels between vegetal and animal irritability.[9] The presentation, reported positively in contemporary scientific journals, further solidified Bose's experimental approach to plant responses.[9] Bose's demonstrations garnered significant recognition, including praise in a 1902 Nature journal article that commended his revelations on plant pulsations and their implications for physiological unity across life forms.[9] This work sparked international interest in what would later be termed plant neurobiology, influencing subsequent studies on plant sensitivity and electromechanical signaling.[2] In acknowledgment of his contributions, Bose was knighted in 1917, partly for advancing plant science through innovative instrumentation.[10] The acclaim also facilitated institutional support, leading to the establishment of the Bose Research Institute in Kolkata that same year, where the crescograph was refined and applied in ongoing experiments.[11]Design and Operation
Core Components
The crescograph features a sturdy base that provides stability for the entire apparatus, incorporating a clamp to securely hold the plant specimen, such as a stem or root tip, ensuring minimal disturbance during measurement. This main structure supports the mechanical components while allowing precise attachment to the growing part of the plant.[1][12] At the heart of the device is a series of articulated levers constructed from lightweight materials, including bamboo, metal, or aluminum alloys like navaldum for rigidity and reduced inertia. The lever system provides initial magnification of up to 100 times, amplifying minute movements of the plant through a compound arrangement of balanced arms supported by frictionless jeweled bearings to enhance precision. Bose's mechanical design emphasized analog amplification due to the technological constraints of the early 20th century, avoiding electrical components for reliability in biological observations.[1][13][12] Integrated clockwork gears serve as the timing mechanism, synchronizing the recording process with precise intervals, such as 1 to 10 seconds, to track growth rates accurately over time. These gears drive the motion of the recording surface, maintaining uniform speed for consistent data capture.[1][14] The recording apparatus consists of a smoked glass plate or rotating drum coated with soot, upon which a stylus attached to the final lever end traces the amplified movements, producing visible records of growth pulses. This analog method allows for direct inscription of plant responses without digital intermediaries, highlighting the device's simplicity.[1][12] A secondary mechanical stage further enlarges the lever output by an additional 100 times, achieving a total sensitivity of up to 10,000 times, capable of detecting growth increments as small as 0.0005 mm within fractions of a second. This multi-stage magnification underscores the crescograph's role in enabling high-resolution, real-time observation of plant physiology.[1][12]Measurement Mechanism
The crescograph's measurement mechanism begins with the attachment of a selected plant part, such as the tip or petiole, to the short arm of a primary lever using a fine thread or a hooked attachment made of lightweight navaldum (an aluminum alloy). This connection transmits any minute displacement caused by growth or movement directly to the lever system, ensuring that the plant experiences minimal additional tension through the use of counterpoises and flexible linkages.[15][13] Amplification occurs through a compound lever arrangement, where the primary lever's movement is further multiplied by a secondary lever, achieving a total magnification factor of , with and representing the individual lever ratios (e.g., up to 10,000 times using arms of 25 cm and 40 cm). For instance, a plant displacement of 0.0005 mm can be enlarged to several millimeters on the recording surface, allowing detection of growth increments as small as 0.05 micrometers per second. This mechanical leverage relies on rigid yet lightweight materials to minimize inertia and friction at the fulcrums.[15][13] The recording process employs a stylus or fine glass fiber from the secondary lever that scratches traces onto a smoked glass plate, which rotates uniformly via clockwork gears to produce time-based graphs akin to kymograph records. Dots are marked at regular intervals (e.g., every 1–15 seconds or minutes) to indicate time progression, enabling the visualization of growth rates down to 1 mm per hour in pulsating patterns. Sensitivity is calibrated by adjusting lever tensions and counterweights for specific plant types, such as herbaceous stems versus woody tissues.[15] Despite its precision, the mechanism has limitations inherent to its manual, non-electronic design, including high sensitivity to external vibrations that necessitate stable, wall-mounted setups and padded environments. Precise manual alignment during attachment is required to avoid introducing artifacts, and excessive lever weight can impose tension that temporarily alters natural growth rhythms.[15][13]Scientific Applications
Plant Growth Measurement
The crescograph served as a pivotal instrument for quantifying plant elongation, enabling precise measurements of linear extensions in stems, roots, and leaves that were imperceptible to the naked eye. By magnifying movements up to 10,000 times, it recorded growth increments as small as 0.0005 mm, facilitating the detection of subtle physiological processes such as cellular turgor fluctuations.[1] This capability revealed that plant growth occurs in pulsatile patterns, characterized by alternating spurts of elongation followed by brief contractions, with cycles ranging from 13.5 seconds to several minutes depending on species and environmental conditions.[14] In Desmodium, for instance, Bose observed five such cycles per minute, highlighting rhythmic contractions amounting to about one-quarter of the preceding growth spurt.[16] Beyond baseline elongation, the crescograph excelled in analyzing tropisms by tracking directional curvatures in response to environmental cues. For phototropism, it documented heliotropic bending in plants like Helianthus annuus (sunflower), where light exposure induced asymmetric turgor changes leading to curvature over minutes.[14] These measurements produced graphical tracings on smoked glass plates, which could be converted to growth rates, such as baseline elongations of approximately 0.05–0.1 mm per minute in species like S. Kysoor under controlled conditions.[1] A key advantage of the crescograph over earlier auxanometers lay in its superior resolution, magnifying growth 500 times more than the typical 10–20 times of auxanometers, thus allowing detection of ultra-slow rates and immediate responses without prolonged observation periods.[17] This precision stemmed from its lever system and clockwork mechanism, which minimized external disturbances and maintained constant experimental conditions. In practice, setups varied by plant type: for monocots like banana (Musa), the device revealed shorter pulsation periods tied to turgor cycles, while dicots such as tomato and Chrysanthemum exhibited broader pulse widths up to 100 mm in tracings, reflecting differences in growth rhythms influenced by diurnal variations—subtle in mornings and peaking at noon.[14] Bose's demonstrations with these setups underscored the crescograph's role in establishing foundational insights into plant physiology.[1]Response to Stimuli Studies
The crescograph enabled detailed observation of plant responses to chemical stimuli, revealing behaviors analogous to animal physiology. In experiments with poisons such as chloroform and ether, tracings recorded a state of "anesthesia" where pulsations and growth movements ceased, mimicking the suppression of nervous activity in animals; recovery occurred upon removal of the agent, with gradual restoration of rhythmic activity.[18] Stimulants like dilute ether and ammonium carbonate, applied to sub-tonic tissues, accelerated pulsations and revived movements in species such as Desmodium gyrans, with tracings showing enhanced amplitude and frequency post-application.[19] These controlled applications isolated chemical effects, demonstrating excitatory phases of heightened response followed by inhibitory suppression, directly challenging views of plants as passive organisms.[14] Mechanical and electrical stimuli further illustrated dynamic plant reactions, with the crescograph capturing excitatory and inhibitory phases akin to nerve impulses. Wound responses in plants like Desmodium produced immediate tracings of growth inhibition and arrested pulsations, followed by a recovery phase; electrical shocks could restore these movements, as seen in records where low-intensity currents (0.5–100 µA) induced leaf responses in Mimosa.[18] Electrical stimulation tracings exhibited latent periods (e.g., 1–6 seconds) and intensity-dependent effects, leading to overstimulation and eventual "death" from exhaustion, paralleling animal reflex fatigue.[14] Bose's methodology emphasized isolating variables through precise timing (to a thousandth of a second) and high-magnification recordings on smoked plates, providing visual evidence of these unified responses across kingdoms.[18] Key findings from these studies highlighted rhythmic pulsations in plants, with cycles on the order of seconds to minutes in sensitive species like Mimosa and Desmodium, and phenomena such as fatigue under repeated stimulation, where responses diminished progressively until recovery or permanent cessation.[20] In Desmodium gyrans, the "telegraph plant," autonomous leaflet movements exhibited motor-like actions responsive to stimuli, with Bose's data linking these to animal reflexes through shared electrical signaling (e.g., 0.4 mV pulses) and chemical sensitivities.[19] These observations, supported by tracings that quantified excitatory contractions and inhibitory relaxations, underscored a non-anthropocentric view of biology, positing plants as actively responsive entities.[14]Legacy and Impact
Contributions to Plant Physiology
The crescograph provided empirical evidence that revolutionized understandings of plant behavior by demonstrating the existence of what Bose termed a "nervous" system in plants, characterized by phloem cells functioning as nerves and pulsating cells in the inner cortex akin to animal heart cells. This work challenged prevailing views in botany that treated plants as passive organisms, instead highlighting their excitability and complex signaling mechanisms, such as local graded potentials and propagating action potentials, which laid foundational insights for modern fields like plant neurobiology and bioelectrics. By magnifying plant movements up to 10 million times, the device revealed responses in non-motile species, establishing plants as dynamic entities capable of irritability similar to animals.[2] A seminal contribution came through Bose's 1906 publication, Plant Response as a Means of Physiological Investigation, which utilized crescograph data to systematically argue for plant irritability and the physiological unity between plant and animal responses. In this work, Bose presented detailed records of plant autographs—traces of growth and stimuli responses—demonstrating how external factors elicited measurable pulsations and movements, thereby advancing quantitative methods in plant physiology. This text integrated biophysical approaches, emphasizing the crescograph's role in uncovering hidden physiological processes.[21] The crescograph's findings exerted global influence, inspiring researchers in their studies on tropisms and prompting citations in numerous scientific works during the 1920s on plant tropisms and hormonal mechanisms, well before the formal discovery of auxin. At the institutional level, the Bose Institute in Calcutta sustained crescograph-based research until Bose's death in 1937, training a generation of Indian scientists in precise biophysical measurement techniques and fostering advancements in plant response studies.[2] Despite these impacts, Bose's interpretations faced controversies, with critics like Daniel T. MacDougal accusing him of anthropomorphism for attributing nervous-like qualities to plants, often compounded by racial biases that marginalized his contributions. However, later research validated key aspects of his findings; for instance, Frits Went's 1928 identification of auxin as a growth hormone echoed Bose's observations of diffusive chemical signaling underlying slow tropistic responses, confirming the physiological basis for plant irritability.[2]Modern Successors and Relevance
The crescograph's mechanical principles for precise growth measurement have been succeeded by electronic sensors offering sub-micron precision, marking a shift from analog levers to digital transduction in plant studies. Linear variable displacement transducers (LVDTs) exemplify this evolution, enabling automated, high-resolution monitoring of stem elongation and radial changes in plants with resolutions down to 0.1 micrometers.[22] These sensors integrate with multi-channel systems to track environmental influences on growth simultaneously.[22] Similarly, laser interferometers provide non-contact, nanometer-scale measurements of plant extension, surpassing the crescograph's magnification by leveraging optical interference patterns for real-time data acquisition. Digital adaptations extend these technologies through computer-interfaced auxanometers, such as high-throughput imaging systems that facilitate real-time 3D tracking of root and shoot dynamics without physical contact. These platforms connect to software for automated data logging and analysis, allowing researchers to quantify growth rates under controlled conditions. Complementing this, image processing algorithms analyze pulsations in plant tissues, extracting patterns of rhythmic expansion to reveal underlying physiological processes.[23] In contemporary agronomy, these successors monitor crop responses to climate stressors, including drought and heat, by capturing subtle growth variations that indicate resilience or vulnerability. For instance, LVDT-based systems assess how water deficits alter elongation rates in staple crops like maize, informing breeding for stress-tolerant varieties. Historical replicas of the original crescograph at the Bose Institute museum serve educational purposes, demonstrating foundational techniques to students and visitors.[24] The crescograph remains relevant by inspiring bio-inspired robotics, where its revelations on plant motility influence designs for soft, adaptive mechanisms in autonomous systems.[25] It continues to underpin 2020s research on electrical signaling in plants, as cited in studies examining drought-induced action potentials that propagate stress responses systemically.[26]References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Collected_Physical_Papers/The_High_Magnification_Crescograph
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Life_Movements_in_Plants_Vol_1
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Life_Movements_in_Plants_Vol_1/Chapter_19
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Collected_Physical_Papers