Hubbry Logo
Falling leafFalling leafMain
Open search
Falling leaf
Community hub
Falling leaf
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Falling leaf
Falling leaf
Falling leaf
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Diagram of a falling leaf maneuver

A falling leaf (also called a rudder stall or oscillation stall) is a maneuver in which an aircraft performs a wings-level stall (the airplane stops flying and starts falling) which begins to induce a spin. This spin is countered with the rudder, which begins a spin in the opposite direction that must be countered with rudder, and the process is repeated as many times as the pilot determines. During the maneuver, the plane resembles a leaf falling from the sky; first slipping to one side, stopping, and then slipping to the other direction; continuing a side-to-side motion as it drifts toward the ground.

Maneuver

[edit]

A falling leaf is a controlled stall performed in a fixed-wing aircraft. The maneuver is performed by purposely stalling the airplane and then carefully using the rudder to try to hold the aircraft on a steady course. The falling leaf consists of a constant rotation about the yaw axis while continually changing the direction. This is opposed to a flat spin, where the aircraft constantly rotates around its yaw axis in only one direction, similar to a Frisbee. The falling leaf is sometimes described as carefully "walking" the aircraft while stalled. The maneuver is typically performed mostly with the rudder, trimming with the elevator but keeping the ailerons neutral.

With the exception of landing, plus a few exotic maneuvers, stalling an aircraft is typically avoided in most conventional maneuvers, both because the plane is no longer flying normally, making the control surfaces sloppy and sluggish to react, and also because the aircraft is balanced on the edge of losing control. If the pilot can maintain a level attitude (nose position in relation to the horizon) and keep the wings level, the plane should theoretically float downward at its terminal velocity, which is partially determined by the shape of the plane in the direction of the relative wind. However, the slightest bit of variation in any of a number of factors, such as control surface inputs or air turbulence, will generally result in the aircraft beginning a rotation around both the yaw and roll axes, referred to as "incipient spin." The rotation may be self-induced, called autorotation, or, in maneuvers like the falling leaf, the rotation is pilot-induced by using the rudder.

The incipient spin begins when the aircraft first starts to rotate around the yaw axis. The rotation causes one wing to move faster than the other, which in turn induces some roll toward the slower wing. As the aircraft rolls it slips sideways. If the spin is not stopped, the plane will continue to roll and slip until it is in an out-of-control, helical spin towards the ground. However, if rudder is used to stop the incipient spin before it becomes a full spin, the direction can be reversed. In this case the incipient spin will begin in the opposite direction, so it must be stopped again, and the process is repeated throughout the maneuver.

The falling leaf is often used as a training maneuver, teaching the pilot to control the plane during a stall and helping beginners to overcome the fear that happens when a plane stalls unexpectedly. It is generally performed from a low-speed, straight, level stall, to avoid the buffeting, departure from the normal flightpath, and flat spin that can develop from powered stall. It is also used in aerobatic competitions and shows as a demonstration maneuver.[1][2][3][4]

Execution

[edit]
A falling leaf from the perspective of the wingtip


A falling leaf is performed by first cutting the throttle and possibly deploying the speed brakes, if available, allowing the aircraft's speed to drop to the point where the relative wind can no longer hold the plane aloft, called the "stall speed." As the speed drops, the pilot holds the plane as level as possible in both the longitudinal direction (lengthwise) and the lateral direction (wing-wise). When the stall speed is reached, the plane will lose lift and begin to fall. Due to the low speed and high angle of attack (the angle of the wings to the relative wind), the aircraft loses its boundary layer, making the control surfaces barely responsive to pilot inputs. Therefore, the controls are usually pushed to their maximum limit to get the plane to respond.

As the aircraft stalls, the nose will begin to drop. At this point the pilot applies full or nearly full elevator, to hold the nose attitude near the horizon. While holding the ailerons neutral, the pilot applies full rudder in one direction, to induce a spin. When the spin begins, the pilot reverses the rudder direction. The aircraft will roll during the spin and will drop to the side in a slip before the rudder has a chance to take authority over the plane. As the rudder stops the spin, the wings will level, and then the incipient spin will begin in the opposite direction, causing the plane to roll and slip to that side. At this time, the pilot reverses the rudder, and this is repeated until the pilot decides to disengage from the maneuver. During the maneuver, the pilot attempts to hold the wings as level as possible, using only the rudder with no help from the ailerons.

To disengage from the maneuver, while simultaneously using the rudders to stop rotation, the pilot releases back pressure on the elevator in order to lower the nose and allow the plane to gain speed. Once the stall speed is passed, the pilot can pull back on the stick to return to normal flight. Therefore, the pilot must ensure that there is sufficient altitude to recover from the stall when performing and exiting the maneuver.[5]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Falling leaf

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The falling leaf is an aerobatic flight maneuver originating as a training exercise, in which an performs a wings-level and then slips successively to the right and left while maintaining on the controls, resulting in a slow, descent that resembles a fluttering to the ground. This maneuver is primarily used in pilot training to build confidence in stall recovery and enhance coordination skills, particularly rudder usage, by demonstrating how to control an aircraft in a fully stalled condition without relying on ailerons. Introduced early in flight instruction, the falling leaf helps pilots develop a feel for slow-flight , reduces of stalls, and teaches precise control to prevent , making it a valuable exercise for landings and overall aircraft handling proficiency. While typically performed in light aircraft, advanced variants can be demonstrated by high-performance jets like the F-22 Raptor using for enhanced control.

Introduction

Definition

The falling leaf maneuver is a controlled aerodynamic condition in aviation where an aircraft enters and maintains a sustained wings-level stall by holding continuous back pressure on the elevator control, resulting in oscillatory sideslips that create a zigzag descent pattern resembling a leaf fluttering downward. This differs from a standard stall recovery, which involves reducing the angle of attack to regain lift, as the pilot intentionally prevents forward stick input to prolong the stall state. Key characteristics include the operating at a high beyond the wing's critical value, where airflow separation disrupts lift production, leading to repeated pitching oscillations between high and low angles of attack while the wings rock side to side in shallow slips and skids. The pilot uses inputs to counteract yaw tendencies and maintain coordination, preventing the maneuver from developing into an uncontrolled spin, with the descent occurring at a relatively low sink rate due to the controlled nature of the oscillations. The term "falling leaf" derives from the visual similarity of the aircraft's back-and-forth motion to a leaf descending from a tree, and it is also referred to as a stall or stall in some contexts. A , for reference, is fundamentally an aerodynamic event where the exceeds its critical angle of attack, causing a sudden loss of lift due to disruption over the .

Historical Context

The falling leaf maneuver emerged in the early as a demonstration of controlled stalled flight, particularly with following . It was first documented in contexts around 1920, when Ira Fuller attempted the stunt during a of the B-3 , involving a stall followed by side-to-side rolling descent, though it resulted in a fatal crash near . By the 1930s, it appeared in military training curricula, such as U.S. Navy programs, where pilots were instructed in basic including the falling leaf to build coordination skills. The maneuver's evolution integrated it into broader stall analysis and training literature during the mid-20th century. Pioneering aviator and author Wolfgang Langewiesche discussed stalled flight behaviors akin to the falling leaf in his seminal 1944 book Stick and : An Explanation of the Art of Flying, emphasizing use to maintain control in post-stall conditions. In civilian , it gained traction through predecessors to modern FAA handbooks in the , serving as a tool for teaching coordination during stalls. Military applications advanced in the and , with studies on jet fighters like the F/A-18 Hornet analyzing the oscillatory falling-leaf mode for departure recovery, as detailed in reports on supersonic aircraft stall/spin accidents. Notable milestones include the (AOPA)'s 1998 endorsement for introducing the falling leaf early in primary training to enhance rudder proficiency and reduce fears. Since the 2000s, it has been incorporated into simulator-based (UPRT), simulating post- scenarios to prepare pilots for real-world loss-of-control events. Culturally, the falling leaf featured in early aerobatic airshows, such as aviatrix Laura Bromwell's 1920 performance at a track meet, where it was showcased alongside loops and inverted flight to captivate audiences. No single inventor is credited, but its ties to post-WWI biplane experimentation and Langewiesche's analyses underscore its roots in practical flight instruction rather than deliberate .

Aerodynamics

Stall Fundamentals

A stall in occurs when the angle of attack—the angle between the 's chord line and the oncoming —exceeds a critical value, typically in the range of 16–20° for light , leading to separation from the upper surface of the and a abrupt reduction in lift generation. This separation happens because the over the thickens and detaches at high angles, transitioning from smooth laminar or turbulent flow to chaotic, recirculating eddies that no longer follow the contour effectively. The result is a , independent of , where the 's ability to produce lift diminishes sharply depending on the design. Upon entering a stall, several key forces dominate the aircraft's behavior. Drag increases dramatically—primarily induced and parasitic components—due to the disrupted airflow and increased form drag from the separated boundary layer compared to pre-stall conditions. With lift now insufficient to balance the aircraft's weight, the unbalanced downward force of gravity initiates a descent, as the vertical component of lift falls below the weight vector in steady flight. In a wings-level stall, where the aircraft is uncoordinated and wings are approximately level, there is no initial tendency for roll or yaw rotation; the motion remains primarily vertical and pitch-oriented. The underlying are captured in the lift equation, where lift LL is expressed as L=12ρv2SCL,L = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 S C_L, with ρ\rho as air density, vv as , SS as area, and CLC_L as the lift coefficient. At the critical angle of attack, CLC_L reaches its peak value (often around 1.2–1.6 for typical airfoils), after which it drops precipitously due to , even as speed or other factors remain constant. This coefficient behavior underscores why is fundamentally an angle-of-attack phenomenon rather than a speed-based one. In terms of response, a wings-level often manifests as aerodynamic —vibrations from turbulent flow impacting the —accompanied by a natural nose-down pitching tendency as the center of pressure shifts rearward on the wing. However, for maneuvers requiring a sustained , pilots can maintain this condition by applying continuous back pressure on the control to hold the high , resulting in a controlled, steep descent with ongoing and minimal forward speed.

Sideslip and Yaw Control

In the falling leaf maneuver, rudder deflection induces a yaw rate that generates a sideslip angle, directing lateral airflow over the stalled wings and creating asymmetric conditions. This asymmetry produces differential drag on the wings—higher on the side toward which the nose yaws due to increased effective angle of attack—and a side force from the fuselage and vertical tail, resulting in alternating wing drops and rocking motion. Yaw control during the maneuver relies primarily on the , as s become ineffective or reversed in the regime due to over the s. Pilots apply opposite to counteract , which is amplified in because the down-going aileron (if used) experiences greater drag from airflow, exacerbating the yaw toward the rising wing; instead, inputs maintain coordination by centering the turn coordinator ball and preventing unintended spin entry. In stalled flight, the dihedral effect—normally providing roll stability through sideslip-induced lift differences—is minimal due to separated reducing lift gradients. The primary yaw moment arises from deflection and is expressed dimensionally as
N=12ρv2SbCnN = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 S b C_n
where ρ\rho is air density, vv is , SS is area, bb is wing span, and CnC_n is the yawing moment coefficient (dominated by the term CnδrδrC_{n \delta_r} \delta_r, with δr\delta_r as deflection). This controlled yaw-sideslip oscillation produces a descent path, typically at a rate of around 500 feet per minute, allowing sustained flight without progression to a spin.

Performance and Execution

Procedure

The falling leaf maneuver begins with establishing straight-and-level flight at a safe altitude, reducing power to idle, and applying gradual increases in back on the control to maintain altitude as decreases toward stall speed (approximately 1.3 V_s). As decreases, the pilot continues applying aft pressure until buffet onset signals the , at which point full aft stick or deflection is held to maintain the condition without allowing the to pitch down significantly. This entry phase typically occurs in a training environment with sufficient altitude, such as at least 1,500 feet above ground level (AGL), to accommodate the ensuing descent. Once stalled, the sustain phase involves neutralizing the ailerons to prevent or spin entry, while applying input to induce a controlled sideslip—for instance, right to create a left sideslip. The pilot then uses opposite as needed to counteract wing drops, rocking the s side to side in a controlled manner without allowing the to enter a full spin, thereby maintaining approximate wings-level flight through yaw control alone. This -only technique leverages sideslip dynamics to sustain the maneuver, with remaining near V_s and a typical descent rate of around 500 feet per minute, resulting in 200-400 feet of altitude loss per oscillation cycle. Throughout execution, the pilot monitors heading and altitude closely, ensuring via pedals without inputs, which could exacerbate . To exit, the pilot briefly applies forward stick pressure to break (with full recovery detailed in standard procedures).

Aircraft Considerations

, such as the and Piper Cherokee, are particularly well-suited for practicing the falling leaf maneuver due to their benign characteristics, which facilitate controlled oscillations without rapid progression to a full spin. These designs feature relatively low speeds, typically around 45-50 knots in clean configuration (Vs1), allowing pilots to maintain precise inputs at manageable airspeeds and altitudes. The forgiving of these trainers enable easy recovery through coordinated and use, making them ideal for initial exposure to post- flight . In advanced trainers and aerobatic aircraft like the Extra 300 and , the falling leaf maneuver benefits from enhanced structural G-tolerance, often up to +6/-3 G or higher, supporting sustained high-angle-of-attack flight. However, these aircraft exhibit sharper stall breaks compared to light trainers, necessitating precise and proactive coordination to counteract the more aggressive yaw tendencies during oscillation. The Extra 300, for instance, can maintain level flight in a full stall with full power due to its potent engine, but pilots must exercise heightened vigilance to prevent inadvertent spins from overcorrections. Similarly, the demands active footwork to stabilize the maneuver, leveraging its responsive controls for effective sideslip management. Military jets, including the F-22 Raptor and F/A-18 Hornet, can execute the falling leaf under controlled conditions, often enhanced by systems that provide superior yaw authority at high angles of attack. Entry speeds for these maneuvers typically exceed 200 knots, reflecting the higher stall thresholds inherent to jet designs, though this elevates the risk of departure into uncontrolled flight if not managed precisely. In the F/A-18 Hornet, historical configurations were prone to a persistent "falling leaf mode," an out-of-control requiring significant altitude loss and patient recovery inputs, which prompted software upgrades to mitigate such departures. The F-22, by contrast, leverages its advanced for more stable demonstrations, allowing controlled backward falls without the same recovery challenges. The falling leaf maneuver is generally not recommended for high-performance aircraft without specific modifications or spin recovery training, as their design priorities often prioritize speed and efficiency over post-stall stability. Spin-resistant designs introduced in post-1990s aircraft, such as certain advanced light trainers, incorporate features like swept wingtips and wing fences that dampen natural oscillations, making sustained falling leaf execution more difficult and potentially leading to quicker spin entries if forced. These limitations underscore the need for aircraft-specific procedures to adapt the generic falling leaf technique safely.

Applications

Training Purposes

The falling leaf maneuver serves as a key training tool in , primarily aimed at building pilots' confidence in handling stalled flight conditions. By sustaining a full stall while using inputs to control sideslip and maintain , pilots develop a practical understanding of stall dynamics without entering a spin, thereby reducing apprehension toward high-angle-of-attack flight. This exercise emphasizes authority during uncoordinated flight, where the oscillates in a sideslip similar to a leaf descending, teaching pilots to counteract yaw deviations effectively. Additionally, it sharpens recognition of , as pilots must coordinate with inputs to prevent unintended roll-yaw coupling in stalled conditions. In pilot curricula, the falling leaf is typically introduced early as a demonstration maneuver during private pilot training to illustrate stall behavior and rudder coordination, rather than as a required task for certification. For commercial pilot aspirants, it aligns with advanced stall demonstrations outlined in FAA guidance on basic maneuvers, promoting proficiency in slow-flight and upset scenarios since the 2016 update to relevant handbooks. Organizations like the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) have advocated its early incorporation since 1998 to foster foundational stick-and-rudder skills. Key benefits include a reduced risk of inadvertent spin entries, as the maneuver conditions pilots to prioritize rudder use in uncoordinated stalls, a common precursor to spins. It also enhances pilots' tactile sense of the critical angle of attack by maintaining the aircraft in a stalled state, allowing them to feel aerodynamic cues like buffeting and control limitations firsthand. In the 2020s, adaptations for flight simulators have enabled virtual practice of the falling leaf, integrating it into scenario-based modules for safer, repeatable exposure without real-aircraft risks. Empirical evidence underscores its value in upset prevention and recovery training () programs, where the falling leaf is routinely employed to build recovery proficiency. Industry studies indicate that leads to substantial improvements in recovery performance, with airlines like reporting an approximately 86% decline in stall event rates between 2012 and 2019 following implementation. This training highlights its role in mitigating loss-of-control incidents.

Aerobatic and Demonstration Uses

The falling leaf maneuver is used in aerobatic to develop precise and coordination during stalled flight. It is frequently combined with loops or rolls to create dynamic transitions that enhance the overall aesthetic of the performance, allowing for seamless integration into more complex known or freestyle programs. Power-on variations, which maintain thrust to control descent rate, are particularly adapted for jet-powered in advanced categories, enabling sustained energy for subsequent maneuvers. Military demonstrations prominently feature the falling leaf to highlight in modern fighters. The F-22 Raptor's demonstration team routinely executes this maneuver at events like the Pacific Airshow, where allows the aircraft to descend vertically while yawing side-to-side, captivating audiences and underscoring post-stall control capabilities. Similarly, in the 1990s, the F/A-18 Hornet underwent extensive testing through NASA's program, evaluating the falling leaf mode at angles of attack exceeding 50 degrees to refine flight control laws for enhanced agility in beyond-visual-range combat scenarios. Civilian airshows have incorporated the falling leaf as a staple since the 1950s, with early examples including aerobatic displays by pilot Prentice at the Kaitaia Aero Club Air Pageant and Canterbury Aero Club Air Pageant in New Zealand, where it showcased controlled stalled descent for public entertainment. In formation flying demonstrations, the maneuver's slipping characteristics are analyzed for safety, as illustrated in a 2020 Flying Magazine report on a mid-air collision involving dissimilar aircraft, where the damaged Cessna 170 exhibited a falling leaf-like descent pattern due to control surface impairment. Variations extend to high-alpha executions in fighters for tactical displays, leveraging thrust vectoring for tighter yaw rates, while low-speed, power-off adaptations suit gliders, emphasizing rudder authority in unpowered flight to simulate thermaling recoveries.

Safety and Recovery

Risks

The falling leaf maneuver, characterized by sustained oscillations in sideslip and roll at high angles of attack, poses significant risks primarily through unintended transitions to full spins if rudder inputs become uncoordinated. In this stalled condition, excessive yaw from improper rudder application can initiate incipient spin entries, potentially developing into 1-2 rotations if not immediately countered, as the maneuver inherently involves repeated partial spin dynamics. Altitude loss is another critical hazard, with descent rates typically around 1,000 feet per minute in light general aviation aircraft during controlled execution. Prolonged maneuvers without recovery can result in substantial altitude loss, though practical limits in training (e.g., minimum 2,000 feet above ground level entry) mitigate this. Sideslip physics can amplify these yaw tendencies, exacerbating the risk of departure from controlled flight. Aircraft-specific vulnerabilities heighten these dangers; for instance, early F/A-18 variants were particularly prone to "falling leaf departures" during low-speed, high-angle-of-attack operations, an oscillatory out-of-control mode leading to excessive altitude loss exceeding 8,000 feet and contributing to historical losses from out-of-control flight, including a fatal 1980 incident likely caused by the mode during testing. In , encounters with during the maneuver increase the likelihood of overcontrol, where pilots' exaggerated inputs to counter gust-induced angle-of-attack variations can precipitate an unintended or spin entry. Human factors further compound the risks, with pilots experiencing disorientation from rapid sideslip changes and yaw rates, leading to vestibulo-ocular illusions that impair spatial , as observed in high-yaw-rate during similar stalled maneuvers. Oscillatory motion imposes minimal g-forces, typically near 0 g vertically with minor lateral accelerations around 1 g from and slip inputs. According to FAA and AOPA analyses, and spin events account for approximately 25% of fatal accidents, with loss of control (including /spin) comprising 54% of fatal instructional accidents. These hazards underscore the need for proper setup, such as adequate altitude margins (at least 2,000 feet above ground level) and instructor supervision, to mitigate inadvertent entries.

Recovery Techniques

The standard recovery from a falling leaf maneuver begins with releasing back pressure on the control to reduce the angle of attack below the critical value, typically achieved by applying forward stick pressure to break . Power should be added if necessary to accelerate the and minimize altitude loss, while simultaneously neutralizing and inputs to eliminate sideslip and roll tendencies. This approach leverages fundamental stall principles by promptly re-establishing over the wings, allowing the to regain lift without entering a spin. The recovery procedure follows a structured sequence: first, apply forward yoke pressure to decrease the angle of attack until airspeed increases to approximately the stall speed plus 10 knots, confirming the stall is broken through cessation of buffeting or stick shaker activation; second, once unstalled, use coordinated aileron inputs to level the wings while maintaining coordinated flight with rudder; third, smoothly transition back to cruise configuration by retracting flaps if extended and adjusting power and pitch for desired airspeed. These steps ensure a controlled exit, prioritizing stall breakage over immediate altitude preservation. In advanced applications, such as high-performance jets, recovery may incorporate aircraft-specific features like for enhanced pitch authority or automated systems to assist in angle-of-attack reduction. For instance, the F/A-18 employs an automatic spin-recovery mode that requires precise lateral inputs alongside full forward stick, while (UPRT) protocols outlined by ICAO emphasize a positive G-load push to expedite stall recovery and prevent secondary stalls. Effective execution of these techniques typically results in recovery within a few seconds and minimal altitude loss of 100-200 feet in , a significant contrast to spin recovery which demands more involved steps like opposite and prolonged uncoordinated flight.

References

  1. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-18ab.htm
  2. https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/1998/october/flight-training-magazine/instructor-tips
  3. https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/maneuvers/falling-leaf-stall-overcome-your-fears-and-learn-how-to-fly-them/
  4. https://simpleflying.com/fighter-jet-airshow-maneuvers-explained/
  5. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19990008181/downloads/19990008181.pdf
  6. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-02/SE_Topic_22-02_Stall_Spin_Training.pdf
  7. https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2020/march/flight-training-magazine/defeat-the-bully
  8. https://wingsovercamarillo.com/8-impressive-aerial-show-stunts/
  9. https://www.coastalview.com/news/pioneer-aviators-highs-and-lows/article_3ff5cde0-2916-11ef-b26a-4fbc5756616f.html
  10. https://www.history.navy.mil/content/dam/nhhc/research/histories/naval-aviation/Naval%20Aviation%20News/1940/pdf/15jul43.pdf
  11. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19830018575/downloads/19830018575.pdf
  12. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdfplus/10.2514/6.2008-6870
  13. https://www.cincinnatimagazine.com/article/cincinnatis-first-and-fastest-aviatrix/
  14. https://pilotinstitute.com/what-is-angle-of-attack/
  15. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/07_phak_ch5_0.pdf
  16. https://skybrary.aero/articles/aerodynamic-stall-awareness-and-avoidance
  17. https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/introductiontoaerospaceflightvehicles/chapter/maximum-lift-stalling-spinning/
  18. https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2007/february/flight-training-magazine/stall-expectations
  19. https://www.aviation.govt.nz/licensing-and-certification/pilots/flight-training/flight-instructor-guide/basic-stalling/
  20. https://bravo6flightacademy.com/overcoming-fear-of-stalls-what-every-pilot-should-know/
  21. https://planeandpilotmag.com/avoiding-the-stall/
  22. https://home.engineering.iastate.edu/~shermanp/AERE355/lectures/Flight_Stability_and_Automatic_Control_N.pdf
  23. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19970019603/downloads/19970019603.pdf
  24. https://pilotworkshop.com/tips/fear-of-stalls/
  25. https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/maneuvers/falling-leaf-stall/
  26. https://www.purdueaviationllc.com/aircraft-rental/cessna-172
  27. https://www.iac.org/files/magazines/SA-2013-06.pdf
  28. https://blog.apstraining.com/resources/traffic-pattern-stalls
  29. https://www.beechtalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=184796&start=45
  30. https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/landing-a-pitts-trick.65671/
  31. https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/ac/docs/990414-ART-Super-Hornet.htm
  32. https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3738&context=utk_gradthes
  33. https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2003-06-17-Upgraded-F-A-18-Flight-Control-Software-Leads-to-Mishap-Reduction
  34. https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3700&context=utk_gradthes
  35. https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/can-leaf-stalls-be-taught-in-a-172.302/
  36. https://blog.apstraining.com/resources/the-falling-leaf-exercise
  37. https://skybrary.aero/articles/upset-prevention-and-recovery-training-uprt-updated-perspectives
  38. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2016-1430
  39. https://www.iac.org/aerobatic-figures
  40. https://airfactsjournal.com/2021/07/beyond-the-100-hamburger-how-aerobatics-can-expand-your-horizon/
  41. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZI1tAnlo9ao
  42. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19970003009/downloads/19970003009.pdf
  43. https://www.cambridgeairforce.org.nz/Airshow_History_1950s.html
  44. https://www.flyingmag.com/aftermath-midair/
  45. https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/getting-down-quickly.152696/
  46. https://www.aopa.org/training-and-safety/air-safety-institute/reports-analysis/flight-training-accident-report
  47. https://www.airlineflyingclub.org.nz/images/easyblog_articles/28/2-The-Stalling-Syndrome-BKafc.pdf
  48. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/APAC/RASG/SafetyTools/18-Manual-on-Aeroplane-Upset-Prevention-And-Recovery-Training-Doc10011.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.