Hubbry Logo
Fizeau interferometerFizeau interferometerMain
Open search
Fizeau interferometer
Community hub
Fizeau interferometer
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fizeau interferometer
Fizeau interferometer
Fizeau interferometer
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Figure 1. Fizeau interferometer

A Fizeau interferometer[1] is an interferometric arrangement whereby two reflecting surfaces are placed facing each other. As seen in Fig 1, the rear-surface reflected light from the transparent first reflector is combined with front-surface reflected light from the second reflector to form interference fringes.

The term Fizeau interferometer also refers to an interferometric arrangement used by Hippolyte Fizeau in a famous 1851 experiment that seemingly supported the partial ether-drag hypothesis of Augustin Jean Fresnel, but which ultimately played an instrumental role in bringing about a crisis in physics that led to Einstein's development of the theory of special relativity. See Fizeau experiment.

Applications

[edit]

Fizeau interferometers are commonly used for measuring the shape of an optical surface: Typically, a fabricated lens or mirror is compared to a reference piece having the desired shape. In Fig. 1, the Fizeau interferometer is shown as it might be set up to test an optical flat. A precisely figured reference flat is placed on top of the flat being tested, separated by narrow spacers. The reference flat is slightly beveled (only a fraction of a degree of beveling is necessary) to prevent the rear surface of the flat from producing interference fringes. A collimated beam of monochromatic light illuminates the two flats, and a beam splitter allows the fringes to be viewed on-axis.[2][3]

The reference piece is sometimes realized by a diffractive optical element (computer-generated hologram or CGH), as this can be manufactured by high accuracy lithographic methods. Fig. 2 illustrates the use of CGHs in testing. Unlike the figure, actual CGHs have line spacing on the order of 1 to 10 μm. When laser light is passed through the CGH, the zero-order diffracted beam experiences no wavefront modification. The wavefront of the first-order diffracted beam, however, is modified to match the desired shape of the test surface. In the illustrated Fizeau interferometer test setup, the zero-order diffracted beam is directed towards the spherical reference surface, and the first-order diffracted beam is directed towards the test surface in such a way that the two reflected beams combine to form interference fringes.[4]

Figure 2. Optical testing with a Fizeau interferometer and a computer generated hologram

Fizeau interferometers are also used in fiber optic sensors for measuring pressure, temperature, strain, etc.

Fizeau's ether-drag experiment

[edit]
Main article: Fizeau experiment

Significance

[edit]
Figure 3. Fizeau interferometer for measuring the effect of water movement upon the speed of light.

In 1851, Fizeau used an entirely different form of interferometer to measure the effect of movement of a medium upon the speed of light, as seen in Fig. 3.

According to the theories prevailing at the time, light traveling through a moving medium would be dragged along by the medium, so the measured speed of the light would be a simple sum of its speed through the medium plus the speed of the medium.

Fizeau indeed detected a dragging effect, but the magnitude of the effect that he observed was far lower than expected. His results seemingly supported the partial ether-drag hypothesis of Fresnel, a situation that was disconcerting to most physicists.

Over half a century passed before a satisfactory explanation of Fizeau's unexpected measurement was developed with the advent of Einstein's theory of special relativity.

Experimental setup

[edit]

Light reflected from the tilted beam splitter is made parallel using a lens and split by slits into two beams, which traverse a tube carrying water moving with velocity v. Each beam travels a different leg of the tube, is reflected at the mirror at left, and returns through the opposite leg of the tube. Thus, both beams travel the same path, but one in the direction of flow of the water, and the other opposing the flow. The two beams are recombined at the detector, forming an interference pattern that depends upon any difference in time traveling the two paths.[5]

The interference pattern can be analyzed to determine the speed of light traveling along each leg of the tube.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Fizeau interferometer

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The is a common-path that measures the surface figure and flatness of optical components, such as mirrors and lenses, by generating and analyzing high-contrast interference fringes from multiple reflections between a high-quality reference flat and the test surface separated by a small air gap. Invented by the French Hippolyte Fizeau (1819–1896) around 1862, the device was initially developed for precise of glass parameters and optical surfaces, building on Fizeau's earlier interference experiments from the that explored propagation in media. The configuration was later refined by Léon Laurent in 1883, establishing it as a standard tool in optical testing with monochromatic sources to produce straight fringes when the surfaces are parallel, and distorted patterns revealing deviations on the order of nanometers. In operation, incident passes through a partially transmitting flat, reflects off the test surface, and interferes with reflected from the flat's rear surface, forming a Fizeau etalon where the air gap acts as the interferometer cavity; tilting the reference introduces linear fringes for calibration, while phase-shifting techniques introduced in the 1970s enable quantitative analysis of wavefront errors without mechanical movement. Key applications include precision manufacturing of aspheric and spherical , quality control in semiconductor lithography, and astronomical interferometry—where Fizeau's 1868 proposal inspired stellar measurements by resolving angular sizes through masking. Modern variants, incorporating lasers since the 1960s and swept-wavelength methods since the 1980s, extend its use to large-scale testing like meter-class mirrors and non-contact thickness gauging in industry.

History

Invention and early development

Hippolyte Fizeau, a prominent French physicist, invented the Fizeau interferometer in 1862 as a tool for precise optical measurements, drawing on his earlier collaboration with in the late 1840s to determine the using rotating mirrors. This device marked a significant advancement in , enabling high-resolution observations of light interference to quantify subtle differences. Fizeau's motivation stemmed from the evolving field of wave following Thomas Young's in 1801, which had demonstrated the interference of light waves, inspiring French scientists in the 1860s to develop instruments for more accurate spectral and determinations in optics laboratories. The initial design of the Fizeau interferometer employed a partially reflecting surface, such as a thin plate, to split an incoming into multiple reflected and transmitted components, producing interference patterns from the superposition of these beams. This configuration allowed for the formation of sharp fringes sensitive to minute changes in , making it suitable for applications beyond basic interference demonstration. Fizeau first demonstrated the instrument in French laboratories during the early 1860s, where it facilitated measurements of effects in various media. In his seminal 1862 publication in Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Fizeau introduced the interferometer specifically for measurements, describing how the fringe spacing could be used to determine the of with exceptional precision by comparing interference patterns in controlled setups. This work laid the foundation for the device's use in quantitative and optical testing. The configuration was later refined by Léon Laurent in 1883, establishing it as a standard tool in the optical industry.

Initial experiments

In the early 1860s, Hippolyte Fizeau conducted pioneering experiments with his newly invented interferometer to measure the refractive indices of optical materials and the wavelengths of light. By introducing wedged plates into the , Fizeau generated straight interference fringes whose spacing and position allowed precise determination of these properties through the analysis of fringe shifts caused by the varying air gap and material thickness. This approach provided a direct method for quantifying optical constants in glass and other media, marking a significant advancement in precision metrology for the era. In 1862, Fizeau applied the interferometer for testing the flatness and quality of mirror surfaces destined for astronomical telescopes. The setup involved placing the test mirror in contact or near contact with a reference flat, enabling the observation of Newton's rings-like fringes that revealed surface deviations with sub-wavelength precision, often better than one-quarter wavelength of visible light. This work demonstrated the instrument's utility in optical manufacturing, allowing for the correction of polishing errors that could otherwise compromise telescope performance. Early implementations of the Fizeau interferometer faced notable limitations that influenced experimental design. The system was highly sensitive to external vibrations, which could disrupt fringe stability and require isolated setups or short exposure times to maintain accuracy. Additionally, clear fringe patterns necessitated monochromatic sources, such as sodium lamps emitting at 589 nm, to minimize chromatic dispersion and avoid overlapping orders from polychromatic illumination. These constraints underscored the need for controlled conditions in initial tests.

Operating principle

Optical configuration

The Fizeau interferometer utilizes a common-path optical configuration to measure the quality of optical surfaces with high precision. In the standard setup, collimated monochromatic light from a laser source is incident on a high-quality optical flat with surface flatness better than λ/20, which serves as the reference surface. The reference flat is typically slightly wedged (a few arcminutes) to avoid interference from front-surface reflections. The incoming light partially transmits through the flat to the air gap and reflects from the test surface (such as a flat, spherical mirror, or lens), while the reference beam reflects from the rear surface of the flat (facing the test). The returning test beam recombines with the reference beam and propagates to a detector, such as a CCD camera, via imaging optics to record the resulting interference fringes. The light path in this configuration minimizes environmental disturbances due to its common-path , where both beams share most of the except for the gap between the and test surfaces. Upon recombination, interference occurs because of the difference introduced by the gap and any deviations in the test surface. The path difference Δ is given by Δ=2ntcos⁡θ,\Delta = 2 n t \cos \theta, where nn is the of the medium in the gap (typically air with n≈1n \approx 1), tt is the local thickness of the gap, and θ\theta is of incidence relative to the surface normal; this expression accounts for the round-trip traversal and angular dependence, with surface irregularities in the test optic manifesting as variations in tt. For testing aspheric surfaces, the configuration incorporates computer-generated holograms (CGHs) placed in the reference arm to produce a customized that matches the aspheric departure, enabling null testing without excessive aberrations. These CGHs feature diffractive patterns with line spacings of 1–10 μm to achieve the required , integrating seamlessly with the standard Fizeau setup by replacing or augmenting the reference flat. The Fizeau interferometer operates primarily as a two-beam device for simplicity and stability, though multiple-beam variants can enhance fringe contrast by allowing repeated reflections in a Fabry-Pérot-like arrangement, albeit limited by the low reflectivity (~4%) at the air-glass interfaces. Precise alignment and phase control are facilitated by piezoelectric transducers mounted on the reference flat or , which introduce controlled phase shifts (typically λ/4 steps) to optimize fringe visibility and enable quantitative measurements.

Fringe formation and analysis

In the Fizeau interferometer, interference fringes arise from the superposition of light beams reflected off the reference and test surfaces, where the phase difference stems from the optical path length traversed twice through the intervening medium of refractive index μ and thickness d. For rays at angle θ within the medium, the path difference is 2μd cos θ. A π phase shift occurs upon reflection from the test surface due to the transition from low to high refractive index, while no such shift occurs at the reference surface (high to low). Consequently, destructive interference (dark fringes) occurs when 2μd cos θ = mλ, and constructive interference (bright fringes) when 2μd cos θ = (m + 1/2)λ, with m an integer and λ the wavelength. The fringe order m quantifies this interference and is given by m = 2μd cos θ / λ for dark fringes. To derive this, consider the total phase difference δ = (2π/λ)(2μd cos θ) + π. Setting δ = (2m + 1)π for destructive interference yields (2π/λ)(2μd cos θ) + π = (2m + 1)π, simplifying to 2μd cos θ = mλ after dividing by 2π/λ and rearranging. For bright fringes, δ = 2mπ leads to 2μd cos θ = (m + 1/2)λ. Near-normal incidence (θ ≈ 0, cos θ ≈ 1), the equation reduces to m = 2μd / λ, enabling direct computation of d from observed m, as in air gaps (μ ≈ 1) where λ/2 corresponds to one fringe order shift. Fringes in the Fizeau setup are categorized as localized (Fizeau fringes of equal thickness) or non-localized (Haidinger fringes of equal inclination). Localized fringes form in the plane of the gap with an extended source, depending primarily on local variations in d and resembling for slightly curved surfaces, as θ variation is minimized. Haidinger fringes appear with a observed at , depending on θ for uniform d, with order m varying as cos θ changes. The distinction arises because localized fringes require spatial coherence across the source for position-specific interference, while Haidinger fringes rely on angular coherence. Analysis of these fringes for precise measurements often employs , particularly the , to extract quantitative phase maps from the interference patterns. Four interferograms are captured by incrementally shifting the reference surface phase by 0, π/2, π, and 3π/2 using a , yielding intensities: I1(x,y)=I0(x,y)[1+γcos⁡Ψ(x,y)],I2(x,y)=I0(x,y)[1−γsin⁡Ψ(x,y)],I3(x,y)=I0(x,y)[1−γcos⁡Ψ(x,y)],I4(x,y)=I0(x,y)[1+γsin⁡Ψ(x,y)],\begin{align*} I_1(x,y) &= I_0(x,y) [1 + \gamma \cos \Psi(x,y)], \\ I_2(x,y) &= I_0(x,y) [1 - \gamma \sin \Psi(x,y)], \\ I_3(x,y) &= I_0(x,y) [1 - \gamma \cos \Psi(x,y)], \\ I_4(x,y) &= I_0(x,y) [1 + \gamma \sin \Psi(x,y)], \end{align*} where I_0 is the average intensity, γ the visibility, and Ψ the phase encoding the path difference. The wrapped phase is then Ψ(x,y)=tan⁡−1[I4(x,y)−I2(x,y)I1(x,y)−I3(x,y)],\Psi(x,y) = \tan^{-1} \left[ \frac{I_4(x,y) - I_2(x,y)}{I_1(x,y) - I_3(x,y)} \right], unwrapped to provide the full phase map, from which gap variations are obtained via d(x,y) = \lambda \Psi(x,y) / (4\pi \mu) for the double-pass geometry. This method achieves sub-wavelength precision. Key error sources in PSI analysis include air turbulence, which introduces random phase errors through refractive index gradients induced by temperature or convection currents, degrading fringe stability and phase accuracy to several nanometers RMS in uncontrolled environments. Mitigation involves environmental controls such as sealed enclosures for thermal stability, low-velocity air conditioning to minimize gradients, or short-coherence-length sources to reduce sensitivity to path mismatches. Fringe visibility V = (I_\max - I_\min)/(I_\max + I_\min) governs the in analysis, with the diffraction pattern of the aperture influencing effective contrast in wide-field setups by modulating beam overlap. For low-reflectivity surfaces approximating two-beam interference, V = 2r / (1 + r^2) where r is the reflectivity ratio of the beams.

Fizeau's ether-drag experiment

Experimental setup

The experimental setup for Fizeau's 1851 ether-drag experiment adapted the basic principles of optical to detect potential entrainment by measuring changes in speed through moving . from the Sun, with a of approximately 550 nm, was directed laterally through a translucent mirror to split the beam into two paths, each traversing a separate filled with flowing . The tubes were parallel, with traveling along their centers to avoid wall effects, and a mirror at the far end of each path returned the beams for recombination, forming interference fringes observable through a equipped with adjustable slits and a graduated for precise measurement. A convergent lens was placed behind the slits to enhance fringe visibility. The glass tubes had an internal diameter of 5.3 mm and a length of 1.487 m each, allowing for a double transit path of about 3 m per beam. was pumped through the tubes in opposite directions—parallel to the propagation in one tube and antiparallel in the other—to isolate any drag effect on , with flow speeds reaching up to 7.059 m/s. Two telescopes facilitated fringe in both flow configurations, enabling comparison of the interference patterns with and without water motion. To address chromatic dispersion caused by the water, compensators consisting of adjustable glass plates were inserted into the paths, equalizing optical lengths for different wavelengths and ensuring clear monochromatic fringes. The apparatus included modifications such as enclosing the tubes in a controlled environment to minimize or variations due to heat from the setup or ambient conditions. The entire experiment was performed at Fizeau's home in near .

Results and theoretical significance

In Fizeau's 1851 experiment, the speed of light propagating through moving was observed to increase by an amount corresponding to a of approximately 0.44 times the of the . This result aligned closely with the prediction from Augustin-Jean Fresnel's 1818 hypothesis of partial ether drag, where the coefficient f=1−1n2≈0.44f = 1 - \frac{1}{n^2} \approx 0.44 for 's n≈1.33n \approx 1.33. The measured fringe shift in the interferometer was consistent with the expected phase difference given by Δϕ=2Lλfvc,\Delta \phi = \frac{2L}{\lambda} f \frac{v}{c}, where LL is the optical path length through the water, λ\lambda is the wavelength of light, vv is the water speed (around 7 m/s in the setup), and cc is the speed of light; this derivation follows directly from Fresnel's formula adapted to the interferometer geometry. Fizeau reported these findings in the Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, establishing empirical support for partial rather than complete ether entrainment by moving media, thereby challenging both fully stationary ether models and complete-drag theories like that of George Gabriel Stokes. The experiment's significance extended beyond immediate optics, profoundly influencing 19th- and 20th-century physics. It prompted to incorporate the Fresnel drag coefficient into his electron theory of 1895 and later transformations, providing a framework to reconcile ether-based models with observed phenomena. The Michelson-Gale experiment of 1925 further confirmed the drag effect in a rotating system, measuring fringe shifts in agreement with Fresnel's coefficient to within experimental precision. Ultimately, Albert Einstein's 1905 theory of provided a definitive explanation without invoking the , attributing the observed speed variation to relativistic velocity addition, , and effects in the moving medium. Modern recreations, including fiber-optic implementations, have resolved minor discrepancies in Fizeau's original data due to factors like dispersion and flow turbulence, confirming the relativistic prediction with agreement typically within a few percent. These validations underscore the experiment's enduring role as a in the transition from classical theories to modern relativity.

Applications

Optical surface testing

The Fizeau interferometer serves as a in precision for evaluating the flatness and of surfaces by comparing the test optic to a reference flat or spherical surface, generating interference fringes that directly indicate path length deviations. Each fringe shift corresponds to a λ of difference, enabling quantitative mapping of surface irregularities with resolutions down to λ/10 or better, which is critical for high-performance components such as (EUV) mirrors where sub-nanometer accuracy is required to minimize scattering and aberrations. This comparative approach leverages the common-path configuration to suppress , ensuring reliable measurements of surface figure errors across apertures up to several meters. For non-spherical like aspheres, null testing configurations incorporate computer-generated holograms (CGHs) as diffractive null elements to produce a reference that matches the ideal test surface, nulling the interference pattern for direct error detection without auxiliary that could introduce aberrations. The captured interferogram is processed via phase-shifting to yield a wrapped phase map, which is then converted to surface height using the formula h=λ4πΔϕ,h = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi} \Delta\phi, where hh is the height deviation, λ\lambda is the illumination wavelength, and Δϕ\Delta\phi is the unwrapped phase difference, reflecting the double-pass propagation in the Fizeau cavity. Phase unwrapping is essential to resolve the modulo-2π ambiguity; algorithms such as least-squares minimization integrate local phase gradients globally to reconstruct continuous profiles, while branch-cut methods identify and connect discontinuity lines to prevent error propagation, achieving sub-wavelength accuracy even for surfaces with slopes exceeding 100 mrad. These techniques ensure robust profiling by handling noise and large phase jumps inherent in high-numerical-aperture measurements. In semiconductor , employs advanced Fizeau systems with low-coherence sources for homogeneity and surface verification of projection lenses, achieving measurement uncertainties below λ/100 to support nanoscale patterning. For astronomical applications, Fizeau interferometers have facilitated the qualification of large mirrors to figures of λ/20, as demonstrated in the fabrication and testing of segmented primaries where stitching multiple sub-aperture measurements ensures overall wavefront quality. These capabilities underscore the instrument's role in for demanding extreme precision. Advancements in detector technology, such as high-dynamic-range CCD cameras, enable single-shot or phase-shifted acquisitions with pixel resolutions exceeding 1 megapixel, while software platforms like Zygo MetroPro automate fringe analysis, and tilt subtraction, and error budget allocation to isolate intrinsic surface errors from alignment artifacts. This integration supports real-time feedback in iterative cycles, reducing fabrication time for precision by orders of magnitude compared to manual methods. Fringe analysis methods from the operating principle are routinely applied here to extract phase maps for detailed profiling.

Sensing and other uses

Fiber-optic variants of the Fizeau interferometer, particularly extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric (EFPI) configurations, enable sensing of physical parameters such as , , and strain. In sensing, variations in the air gap between the fiber endface and a diaphragm reflector alter the , shifting interference fringes to quantify applied force with resolutions down to 0.1 kPa. measurements exploit of the sensor cavity, while strain detection relies on elongation-induced gap changes, achieving sensitivities as high as 1 μɛ through low-coherence sources that eliminate phase ambiguity and enhance signal . These fiber-optic EFPI sensors provide inherent immunity to electromagnetic interference, allowing reliable operation in electrically noisy or high-radiation environments like nuclear facilities or biomedical implants. Recent innovations in the 2020s incorporate white-light interferometry for absolute distance measurements, extending unambiguous ranges to approximately 1 m with sub-micrometer precision by leveraging spectral-domain analysis of broadband interference envelopes. Beyond basic sensing, Fizeau interferometers support displacement measurements in , delivering nanometer-scale resolution essential for fabrication processes, such as flatness profiling with axial accuracies of 1 nm. In applications, vibration-immune designs using low-coherence illumination enable real-time analysis of structural vibrations, maintaining fringe stability under dynamic loads up to 100 Hz. Specific implementations include mirror alignment in gravitational wave detectors like , where Fizeau systems characterize test mass surface figures to sub-wavelength precision, complementing primary Michelson interferometers for overall optical alignment. In biomedical contexts, Fizeau interferometers facilitate by mapping dynamic tear film and epithelial surface profiles , supporting diagnostics for conditions like with temporal resolutions under 1 ms.

References

  1. https://www.rp-photonics.com/fizeau_interferometers.html
  2. https://apre-inst.com/laser-fizeau-interferometer-history/
  3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353630901_The_state_of_the_art_in_swept-wavelength_laser_Fizeau_interferometry
  4. https://www.britannica.com/technology/Fizeau-Laurent-surface-interferometer
  5. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/jcwyant/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/08/5-TestingFlatSurfaceOpticalComponents.pdf
  6. https://www.montana.edu/jshaw/documents/15%20InterferometricTesting_Wyant.pdf
  7. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.71.001255
  8. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/jcwyant/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/08/02-Burge_CGH.pdf
  9. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.11.002045
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5422199/
  11. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/jcwyant/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/08/Session-4.pdf
  12. https://spie.org/samples/PM252.pdf
  13. https://llis.nasa.gov/lesson/717
  14. https://www.4dtechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/Data_Sheets/AccuFiz_Fact_Sheet.pdf
  15. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/jcwyant/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/08/3Coherence.pdf
  16. https://aas.aanda.org/articles/aas/pdf/1996/07/ds4574.pdf
  17. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.3390
  18. https://pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/article/80/6/497/1040680/Fizeau-s-aether-drag-experiment-in-the
  19. https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Fizeau/
  20. https://phys.au.dk/~ulrik/specrel/Mads_Slot_Bertelsen_speciale.pdf
  21. https://www.academie-sciences.fr/pdf/dossiers/Fizeau/Fizeau_pdf/CR1851_p349.pdf
  22. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1902/lorentz/lecture/
  23. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.0501
  24. https://www.edmundoptics.com/knowledge-center/application-notes/optics/effects-of-laser-mirror-surface-flatness/
  25. https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=domo-2002-DTuB3
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7299097_Asphere_testing_with_a_Fizeau_interferometer_based_on_a_combined_computer-generated_hologram
  27. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/jcwyant/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/08/Introduction_to_Interferometric_Optical_Testing.pdf
  28. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/optical-engineering/volume-53/issue-2/024102/Phase-unwrapping-algorithm-by-a-rounding-least-squares-approach/10.1117/1.OE.53.2.024102.full
  29. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11465-020-0602-6
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402604700741
  31. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/571/0000/Test-And-Evaluation-Of-The-Hubble-Space-Telescope-24-meter/10.1117/12.950408.short
  32. https://www.zygo.com/products/metrology-systems/laser-interferometers/verifire
  33. https://www.zygo.com/-/media/project/ameteksxa/zygo/ametekzygo/downloadables/brochures/interferometers/typical-interferometer-setups.pdf
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1068520006000174
  35. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13320-010-0017-9
  36. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0957-0233/19/6/065304
  37. https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/Sort_5685.pdf
  38. https://opg.optica.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?doi=10.1364/OE.546977
  39. https://opg.optica.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-30-18-32660
  40. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/3/1019
  41. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/jcwyant/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/08/LowCoherenceVibrationInsensitiveFizeauInterferometert.pdf
  42. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.014021
  43. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/alumni/wp-content/uploads/sites/113/2023/08/Jason-Micali-Dissertation.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.