Hubbry Logo
Flag of SikkimFlag of SikkimMain
Open search
Flag of Sikkim
Community hub
Flag of Sikkim
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Flag of Sikkim
Flag of Sikkim
from Wikipedia

At present there is no official flag of Sikkim, a state in India. The independent Kingdom of Sikkim did have a national flag until it became a state of India in 1975.

Prior to 1877

[edit]

Before 1877, during the Nepalese-Bhutanese suzerainty and as a protectorate of Tibet, several Nepalese, Bhutanese and Tibetan banners were flown in Sikkim until 1816, when the United Kingdom took control of the country and flown the Union Jack until 1877, when the first Sikkimese flag was adopted.

Kingdom of Sikkim (1877–1975)

[edit]

The Kingdom of Sikkim had used several flags during its history. They all contained a Buddhist khorlo prayer wheel with the gankyil as the central element.[1]

Until 1967, the previous flag showed a very complex design with a fanciful border and religious pictograms surrounding the khorlo.

A more simple design was adopted in 1967 because of the difficulty in duplication of the complex flag. The border became solid red, the pictograms were removed and the wheel was redesigned.

With the admission of Sikkim to the Republic of India and with the abolition of the monarchy, the flag lost its official status in 1975.[2]

State of India (1975–present)

[edit]

The Government of Sikkim can be represented by a banner that depicts the emblem of the state on a white background.[3]

Government banner of Sikkim

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The flag of Sikkim was the official ensign of the Kingdom of Sikkim, a Himalayan monarchy, from its adoption in 1877 until the kingdom's merger with India in 1975, featuring a white field symbolizing purity and a central Buddhist khorlo (dharmachakra or prayer wheel) with the gankyil—a tripartite swirling emblem representing the interdependence of existence in Tibetan Buddhism—as its core element. Early versions from 1877 to around 1914 displayed a triple border in red, white, and blue, enclosing an ornate red circular device with multicolored religious motifs including flames, lotuses, and jewels, reflecting the Namgyal dynasty's Tibetan Buddhist heritage. Subsequent designs between circa 1914 and 1967 retained similar bordering but evolved the central emblem to emphasize the khorlo surrounded by six symbolic motifs in red, gold, green, and blue, denoting virtues like compassion and wisdom, before simplifying in 1967–1975 to a single red border framing the unadorned khorlo for clarity in state representation. Following Sikkim's accession as India's 22nd state, the flag lost official status, with the government adopting a plain white banner bearing the state emblem derived from the khorlo instead. These designs underscored Sikkim's sovereignty and spiritual identity amid British protectorate influence and geopolitical pressures leading to integration.

Pre-Kingdom and Early Influences

Flags Prior to 1877

Prior to 1877, the Kingdom of Sikkim maintained no unified official flag, reflecting its status as a small Himalayan polity without a centralized vexillological tradition. The first national flag was adopted in 1877 amid growing British diplomatic contacts. Symbolic banners in use were predominantly religious, such as multi-colored prayer flags bearing Buddhist mantras and auspicious symbols, which originated in pre-Buddhist Tibetan Bön practices and were adapted for spiritual purposes across the region. These flags, typically arranged in sets of five colors representing elements (blue for space, white for air, red for fire, green for water, yellow for earth), served ceremonial and protective roles in monasteries, homes, and passes rather than denoting state authority. Sikkim's fragmented identity arose from longstanding Tibetan suzerainty, under which the Namgyal Chogyals—inaugurated in 1642 with lamas' blessings—rendered annual tribute, fostering cultural and symbolic reliance on Tibetan influences without distinct indigenous standards. Nepalese Gorkha incursions from 1788 onward occupied western territories until expulsion via British aid in 1817, periods during which Gorkha military banners likely supplanted local symbols in controlled areas, though direct documentation is limited. This dependence on external powers underscored the absence of a sovereign flag until British protectorate formalization via the 1861 Treaty of Tumlong necessitated a modern emblem for diplomatic recognition.

Kingdom of Sikkim Era

Adoption and Initial Design (1877–1914)

The flag of the was first officially adopted in 1877, following increased interactions with British authorities after the 1861 Treaty of Tumlong that established as a . This adoption served to symbolize the kingdom's sovereignty and cultural distinctiveness under the Namgyal dynasty, despite external influences. The design consisted of a field, with borders on three sides featuring a triple stripe of red, , and red, ornamented with various Buddhist pictograms and religious motifs. A prominent khorlo, representing a Buddhist , was centered on the field, often depicted in red with outlining, enclosing a symbol. These elements underscored the Lepcha-Bhutia heritage and prevailing Buddhist traditions of the region. The flag remained largely unchanged during the reign of Chogyal Thutob Namgyal (1869–1914), serving primarily in royal ceremonies and diplomatic contexts to represent Sikkim's monarchical authority. No significant modifications were recorded until influences emerging around the World War I period prompted later adjustments.

Modifications and Variations (1914–1967)

Following the accession of Chogyal Tashi Namgyal in 1914, the flag of Sikkim underwent modifications that altered its border structure and central while maintaining the foundational . The updated design featured a field bordered on three sides by a triple stripe of , , and blue, with a central ornamental circular incorporating minor charges in , blue, green, and . This version, documented in mid-20th-century sources, represented an evolution from the pre-1914 configuration, potentially reflecting administrative adaptations during Sikkim's ongoing status as a established in 1890. The core khorlo, or , remained central to the flag's identity, symbolizing Buddhist and Sikkimese religious heritage, but surrounding ornate elements were stylized into a more contained ornamental form, reducing some pictographic complexity compared to earlier iterations. These adjustments coincided with Tashi Namgyal's reign (1914–1963), during which he formalized national symbols including the flag and anthem, amid efforts to modernize governance under external protectorate influences. However, the intricate decorative charges on the borders and emblem posed ongoing challenges for accurate reproduction, particularly as Sikkim transitioned to Indian protectorate status via the 1950 , which centralized defense and foreign affairs under . In 1962, amid the that heightened border tensions along Sikkim's northern frontier with , the flag temporarily reverted to a design akin to the 1877–1914 version, featuring a white field with a triple border and the red khorlo encircled by six ornate motifs in red, gold, green, and blue, including tadpole- and serpent-like shapes. This variation, lasting until 1967, reinstated more elaborate pictograms around the central , possibly to reaffirm traditional during geopolitical strain, though primary documentation attributes it to a brief restoration of earlier stylistic elements. The reversion underscored persistent difficulties with the 1914–1962 design's complexity, as the added decorative border elements like crescents and ticks in multiple colors complicated and consistency, prefiguring the push for simplification in subsequent years.

Simplification and Final Kingdom Design (1967–1975)

In 1967, the flag of the Kingdom of Sikkim was redesigned to simplify its construction and improve reproducibility. The prior version featured a complex triple border of red, white, and blue on the top, fly, and bottom edges, embellished with six gold-framed motifs depicting symbolic charges in red, yellow, and blue. This elaborate bordering was replaced by a uniform solid red border on the same three sides, eliminating the pictograms and layered stripes to reduce manufacturing difficulties. The central white field retained the khorlo—a golden Buddhist prayer wheel with internal gankyil emblem—ensuring continuity of core symbolism while prioritizing practicality. The simplified design addressed administrative and logistical challenges in flag production during a period of modernization in the kingdom's . Historical vexillological accounts note that the change streamlined duplication without altering the 's fundamental proportions or primary emblems, reflecting adaptations to contemporary needs in a small Himalayan . This version flew officially from 1967 onward, embodying Sikkimese sovereignty amid internal political shifts toward greater representation, including the establishment of advisory councils and electoral processes in the early 1970s. The flag remained in use until the monarchy's abolition in 1975, serving as a marker of during escalating demands for and external integration pressures. Archival descriptions confirm its deployment in official contexts, such as state ceremonies and diplomatic displays, underscoring its persistence as a of the kingdom's fading despite evolving geopolitical realities.

Post-Merger as Indian State

Transition Following 1975 Integration

Upon Sikkim's integration into as the 22nd state on May 16, 1975, following the passage of the 36th Constitutional Amendment Act by the Indian Parliament, the kingdom's flag immediately lost its status as a emblem and was supplanted by the Indian national tricolour for all official state functions. This shift marked the termination of Sikkim's independent vexillological tradition, as Indian states do not maintain separate official flags under the national framework, with the tricolour serving uniformly as the primary of authority. The transition was precipitated by political upheaval, including an April 10, 1975, resolution from Sikkim's Assembly abolishing the and proclaiming accession to , endorsed by a on April 14 where approximately 97 percent of participants voted in favor. The deposed , , opposed the process and remained secluded in his palace amid the events, reflecting resistance from royalist elements against the democratic and integrationist measures driven by pro-India assembly members and Indian central oversight. No provisions were made for retaining the kingdom in any governmental capacity, ensuring a clean break from monarchical symbolism to align with India's unitary republican structure. While the flag's design elements—such as the central phantom pheasant or motifs—ceased legal operation, they persisted informally in non-official contexts like cultural displays, underscoring a severance of state without erasure of historical artifacts. This phasing out aligned with broader constitutional changes that incorporated fully into India's federal system, prohibiting distinct state-level flags to reinforce national unity. Following Sikkim's integration as the 22nd state of India on May 16, 1975, the former kingdom's flag was discontinued, and no official state flag has been adopted or proposed since. Although the Constitution of India imposes no explicit prohibition on states maintaining separate flags, in practice, Sikkim and all other states rely exclusively on the national tricolour for official ceremonies and events, with no precedent for recognition of state-level flags by the central government. This adherence was evident in the Tiranga March organized by the Government of Sikkim on May 16, 2025, to mark 50 years of statehood, where the Indian national flag was prominently hoisted without reference to any state-specific design. The employs the state emblem—depicting Mount Kanchenjunga flanked by Buddhist symbols—as its official seal on documents, letterheads, and administrative banners, often on a plain white field, but this does not constitute a equivalent to the national tricolour. Official guidelines restrict the emblem's use to authorized government purposes, with recent enforcement actions in 2025 targeting unauthorized reproductions by non-state entities. Historical flag designs from the Kingdom of Sikkim era persist informally in cultural, touristic, and heritage contexts, such as displays at local events or educational settings, symbolizing pre-1975 identity without legal standing or official endorsement. These usages occasionally highlight indigenous Lepcha and traditions in regions where demographic majorities include post-19th-century Nepali settlers, underscoring ongoing cultural preservation efforts amid integration into the Indian union. No legislative or executive initiatives to formalize a have surfaced from 1975 through October 2025.

Design Features and Symbolism

Layout, Colors, and Construction

The flag of the Kingdom of Sikkim utilized a white field in a rectangular proportion of 2:3. This layout provided a simple horizontal expanse, bordered on the top, bottom, and fly edges with a triple stripe consisting of an outer red band, a middle white band, and an inner blue band. The hoist edge remained unbordered to facilitate attachment. From its adoption in through variations until , the design maintained this bordered structure, with the 1967 simplification removing ornamental dragons from the corners to emphasize unadorned symmetry and the white field's dominance. Unlike the Indian national tricolour's vertical saffron-white-green stripes, Sikkim's flag avoided such partitioning, relying instead on peripheral horizontal and vertical bordering for visual containment. Construction adhered to standards ensuring precise alignment of borders relative to the field's edges, typically employing fabrics like or for durability in Himalayan conditions, though exact material specifications from royal decrees remain undocumented in available records. The central khorlo emblem, spanning roughly one-third of the flag's height, necessitated accurate scaling to preserve proportional balance during fabrication.

Central Emblems and Their Meanings

The central emblem on the flags of the Kingdom of Sikkim from 1877 to 1975 was the khorlo, a representation of the wheel central to Buddhist , symbolizing the of karma, the eightfold noble path, and the dissemination of the Buddha's teachings as an unceasing law governing existence. This wheel, often depicted in yellow with eight spokes, embodied the foundational principle of cyclic change and moral causation in Buddhist doctrine, reflecting the kingdom's adherence to these tenets amid its Himalayan isolation. Embedded within the khorlo was the gankyil, or wheel of joy, a triskelion-like motif of three interlocking swirls in contrasting colors, denoting the interdependence of bliss (method), emptiness (wisdom), and their dynamic union in Buddhism—the dominant tradition under the Namgyal dynasty since its founding in 1642 by , a Tibetan-descended chogyal who integrated priestly rule with tantric practices. This symbol underscored causal realism in Tibetan esotericism, where phenomena arise from interrelated causes without inherent existence, aligning with Sikkim's ethnic Bhutia-Tibetan core while accommodating Lepcha animist substrates through syncretic royal patronage. The layered symbolism of khorlo and tied directly to Vajrayana's empirical emphasis on transformative practices, as propagated by the Namgyal lineage's monasteries, which preserved tantric lineages from amid Sikkim's strategic buffer role. Post-1975 merger into , Lepcha heritage—embodied in the state emblem's phantom butterfly motif, evoking indigenous myths of Kanchenjunga as a protective entity—was foregrounded in official iconography, signaling a shift from dynasty-centric Buddhist exclusivity to inclusive ethnic representation without altering the kingdom-era flag's core emblems. Complex iterations of these emblems, incorporating additional motifs like religious pictograms around the khorlo, drew practical critiques for replication challenges, prompting the 1967 simplification to a stark design for while retaining symbolic essence, a pragmatic balance prioritizing over ornate preservation in a modernizing . This evolution highlighted tensions between cultural fidelity and functional demands, with the streamlined version upholding the emblems' causal and doctrinal integrity absent dilution by extraneous elements.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.