Hubbry Logo
Forward Operating Base ChapmanForward Operating Base ChapmanMain
Open search
Forward Operating Base Chapman
Community hub
Forward Operating Base Chapman
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Forward Operating Base Chapman
Forward Operating Base Chapman
Forward Operating Base Chapman
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Forward Operating Base Chapman, also known as Camp Chapman, was a U.S. installation situated in Khost province, Afghanistan, on an airstrip 2 miles east of Khost. It was opened by the United States Army and extensively used by the Central Intelligence Agency.

Key Information

Prior to the arrival of U.S. forces in 2001 it had been used by the Afghan Armed Forces. The site was also used by the Central Intelligence Agency and was near Forward Operating Base Salerno, a large U.S. Army base.[1][2] The base was named for Sergeant First Class Nathan Chapman, the first U.S. soldier killed by enemy fire during the Afghanistan war, in 2002.[2][3][4][5] Chapman was killed while fighting alongside the CIA.[4]

History

[edit]
A U.S. Army soldier from the 82nd Airborne Division looks down his M4 carbine's sights outside Camp Chapman in 2002.

The CIA's base in Khost was set up at the beginning of the U.S.-led offensive against al-Qaeda and the Taliban in 2001, and began as an improvised center for operations.[6] A military base at the beginning, it was later transformed into a CIA base, a U.S. official said.[7] According to a U.S. military source, Forward Operating Base Chapman was also used as a base for the Khost Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT), a military-led development group.[8] According to an individual who was in the PRT and took part in the relocation; this team left in 2011 and moved to FOB Salerno.[9][10] In recent years, the base, one of the most secretive and highly guarded locations in Afghanistan, evolved into a major counterterrorism hub of the CIA's paramilitary Special Activities Division, used for joint operation with CIA, military special operations forces and Afghan allies, and had a housing compound for U.S. intelligence officers.[2][6][11][12]

On Wednesday, December 30, 2009, the Camp Chapman attack was executed by suicide bomber Humam Khalil al-Balawi who was a Jordanian double agent loyal to al-Qaeda-linked Islamist extremists. Seven people employed by or affiliated with the CIA, including the chief of the base, Jennifer Lynn Matthews[13] as well as a Jordanian intelligence officer, died in the attack. It remains the second-deadliest incident ever for the CIA after the 1983 United States embassy bombing. Almost three years later, on December 26, 2012, a suicide bomber, possibly with ties to the Afghan Taliban (who claimed responsibility via a spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid, claiming those who served American forces at the base were the target) and/or the Haqqani network, killed three Afghans (their status was not specified) who were outside the perimeter of the base, which is near a military airport.[14]

U.S. bases in Khost, in particular Camp Salerno, have frequently been targeted by insurgents. In most cases, however, suicide attackers do not succeed in getting past the main entrance of a base.[15] According to U.S. officials, Forward Operating Base Chapman appears to have implemented less stringent security measures than other U.S. military bases, aiming at establishing trust with informants.[16] Subjecting informants to mistrust and excessive suspicion would reduce the amount of information received from them.[17]

In 2021, in the lead-up to the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan, the Taliban twice targeted the base. In the first attack rockets landed nearby wounding seven civilians. During the second attack a water tower on the base was hit, but no U.S. personnel were hit.[18]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Forward Operating Base Chapman

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Forward Operating Base Chapman, also known as Camp Chapman, was a installation located approximately two miles east of city in , eastern . Established in late by Combined Joint Task Force-180 engineers and the 3rd Battalion, 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment as part of , the base supported counterinsurgency operations against and forces in southeastern . The outpost housed elements of the U.S. Army, including the , which focused on governance, development, and security initiatives in the volatile region. It also featured a forward operating site dedicated to intelligence collection and targeted operations against high-value terrorist targets. FOB Chapman achieved prominence due to a suicide bombing on December 30, 2009, perpetrated by , a Jordanian physician and operative posing as a double agent with intelligence on Osama bin Laden's location. The attack, which occurred at the CIA facility within the base, killed seven CIA officers—the agency's heaviest single-incident loss since the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing—and wounded several others, exposing operational security lapses in asset vetting and physical screening protocols. The base continued operations until the broader U.S. drawdown in , after which it was transferred to Afghan forces and eventually abandoned amid the 2021 resurgence.

Geography and Establishment

Location and Terrain

Forward Operating Base Chapman was located in , in southeastern , approximately two miles east of city on an airstrip. The province borders to the east, positioning the base near key cross-border routes utilized by militants. The site lies within the Bowl, a at an average of about 1,180 meters above sea level, surrounded by rugged highlands and mountains. This terrain, characterized by steep escarpments and tribal-dominated areas, offered observational advantages for regional surveillance but also heightened vulnerability to infiltration from adjacent insurgent sanctuaries.

Founding and Early Infrastructure

Forward Operating Base (FOB) Chapman was established in 2002 by U.S. forces as part of , utilizing an existing airstrip in , eastern , to facilitate efforts against and remnants near the border. The base was named in honor of Nathan Ross Chapman, a U.S. Army Special Forces soldier killed on January 4, 2002, near —the first American service member to die from enemy fire in during the conflict. Initial development focused on transforming the former Afghan airfield into a functional forward operating site, emphasizing rapid deployment capabilities for regional patrols and logistics support. Early infrastructure at FOB Chapman included the rehabilitation of the gravel-surfaced airstrip to accommodate and helicopters, alongside the erection of temporary , command posts, and perimeter defenses using , HESCO barriers, and watchtowers. U.S. engineers prioritized basic utilities such as systems, generators for power, and fuel storage depots to sustain small-unit operations in the austere, mountainous terrain. By mid-2002, elements of the and units had established a presence, conducting initial to support ground reconnaissance and supply convoys into surrounding districts. These developments enabled the base to serve as a logistical hub for coalition forces operating in Paktia and Paktika provinces, without permanent structures initially, relying on tented accommodations and modular facilities.

Operational Role

CIA Intelligence Activities

Forward Operating Base Chapman housed a major (CIA) facility that served as a forward station for (HUMINT) operations in southeastern , primarily targeting the , affiliates, and elements operating across the Afghan-Pakistani border. Established in the early amid expanded U.S. efforts following the 2001 invasion, the site enabled CIA officers to conduct close-proximity intelligence collection in , a Haqqani stronghold known for cross-border militant activity into North . This positioning allowed for rapid debriefings of local informants and assets, integrating HUMINT with to identify high-value targets (HVTs) and disrupt insurgent logistics, training camps, and leadership structures. CIA teams at the base focused on recruiting Pashtun tribesmen and other locals as sources to map militant networks, providing granular details on Haqqani safe houses, weapon caches, and operational plans that informed joint raids with forces. Operations emphasized aggressive targeting campaigns, with officers vetting and handling assets to generate leads on figures like , contributing to pre-2009 eliminations and captures in the region through coordinated drone strikes and ground actions. Interrogations of captured suspects were conducted on-site or in adjacent facilities, yielding intelligence that supported broader efforts to sever al-Qaeda's ties with local insurgents, though the high-risk environment demanded constant adaptations amid pervasive double-agent threats. The facility's role extended to coordinating with CIA drone programs, funneling HUMINT-derived targeting data for strikes in adjacent Pakistani tribal areas, where Haqqani and leaders frequently relocated. By 2009, this integration had intensified as part of a CIA surge in forward basing, with dozens of officers rotating through Chapman to sustain pressure on evolving threats, prioritizing actionable over remote analysis to counter militants' adaptability. These activities underscored the agency's shift toward paramilitary-style operations, blending clandestine recruitment with kinetic outcomes, though reliant on unverified claims that occasionally exposed vulnerabilities.

Military Support and Logistics

Forward Operating Base Chapman relied on U.S. units for its foundational and ongoing logistical support, enabling CIA operations in southeastern . Construction of the base occurred between August and October 2002 by engineers from Combined Joint Task Force-180, alongside the 3rd Battalion, 505th Infantry Regiment of the , transforming a former Afghan airstrip into a functional forward site near the Pakistan border. Early military presence included soldiers from the and , who contributed to initial security and operational setup. U.S. military elements provided the logistical backbone, including assets for supply transport, , and medical evacuations critical to sustaining personnel in the volatile region. Units such as Task Force Red Dog, a Marine aviation detachment, delivered surveillance, escorts, and rapid response capabilities to support joint operations across the border areas. The base's proximity to , a hub for U.S. forces, facilitated coordinated and reinforced defensive postures through shared resources. Perimeter security was maintained by U.S. troops via checkpoints, patrols, and joint Afghan forces, forming a layered defense to protect against incursions in the Taliban-influenced terrain. The Provincial Reconstruction Team, comprising engineers and specialists, operated from Chapman starting in 2004, enhancing logistical resilience through infrastructure projects like roads while collaborating with CIA efforts. These military contributions underscored the interagency partnership, though access protocols revealed inherent challenges in vetting personnel amid high-tempo operations.

The 2009 Suicide Bombing

Background and the Bomber

was a Jordanian physician of Palestinian descent who became radicalized through online jihadist forums, adopting the pseudonym al-Khorasani to propagate extremist views prior to his recruitment. In early 2009, Jordanian General Intelligence Directorate (GID) agents arrested him on suspicion of militant sympathies and coerced him into serving as a , ostensibly to penetrate networks in and provide intelligence on senior figures, which was then shared with the CIA. Al-Balawi's handlers positioned him as a valuable asset amid the CIA's intensified efforts to disrupt following the August 2009 U.S. drone strike that killed Pakistani Taliban leader , a development that heightened militant resentment toward American operations. Al-Balawi cultivated trust by delivering accurate tips that enabled successful CIA drone strikes against Taliban targets in Pakistan, prompting U.S. intelligence to view him as a potential source for breakthroughs against elusive al-Qaeda leadership. He specifically promised firsthand details on Ayman al-Zawahiri's whereabouts, claiming a recent meeting with al-Qaeda's deputy leader, which generated significant excitement among CIA officers desperate for actionable intelligence after years of stalemated counterterrorism efforts in the region. This intel allure overshadowed his underlying loyalty to al-Qaeda, where he maintained covert ties while feigning cooperation, positioning the impending meeting at Forward Operating Base Chapman as an opportunity to exact revenge for U.S. strikes that had decimated militant ranks. Despite these covert affiliations, multiple indicators of unreliability— including warnings from al-Balawi's GID handler about his potential duplicity and inconsistencies in his communications—were downplayed by CIA personnel, who prioritized the prospect of high-value information over rigorous vetting protocols. Jordanian intermediaries had relayed concerns that al-Balawi might still harbor jihadist intentions, yet these were dismissed amid overconfidence in his proven track record and the operational pressure to secure leads on Zawahiri in late 2009. This eagerness exploited the procedural exceptions granted to promising assets, allowing al-Balawi to approach the base without standard security measures that might have detected his concealed explosives.

Sequence of Events

On December 30, 2009, , a Jordanian physician acting as a purported for Jordanian intelligence, approached the perimeter of Forward Operating Base Chapman in , , around 4:30 p.m. local time, transported in a vehicle driven by his Jordanian handler from the General Intelligence Directorate. Standard search procedures at the outer gate, which typically included pat-downs and for visitors, were bypassed because al-Balawi was deemed a high-value, trusted asset based on prior intelligence contributions against , and the handler vouched that preliminary checks had already been conducted. This decision reflected procedural exceptions granted to encourage source cooperation, despite internal CIA concerns about inadequate vetting of foreign-recruited assets. Al-Balawi was then escorted into a secure CIA forward operating annex—a restricted area housing temporary briefing facilities—where multiple CIA officers had assembled without weapons drawn, anticipating a debrief on his claimed access to senior figures, including potential locations for drone strikes. The group clustered closely around him to facilitate the sensitive discussion, forgoing additional security screenings or standoff distances as per relaxed protocols for vetted human sources. Moments after entry, al-Balawi detonated a vest concealed beneath his , containing approximately 25 pounds of high explosives packed with ball bearings for fragmentation effect. The blast occurred in the confined space of the annex, instantly killing eight individuals including seven CIA officers and the accompanying Jordanian handler, while wounding six others. No secondary defensive measures, such as armed sentries or automated barriers, activated effectively in the immediate aftermath, as the setup prioritized intelligence gathering over , underscoring gaps in layered for insider threats. The propagated shockwaves and debris through the structure, initiating a scramble for amid disrupted communications and limited on-site response capabilities.

Immediate Casualties and Response

The suicide bombing at on December 30, 2009, resulted in the deaths of seven CIA officers, including the base chief Jennifer Matthews, and wounded six others, marking the deadliest single incident for the agency since the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing. Among the killed were CIA officers such as Scott Michael Roberson, Harold E. Brown Jr., and Darren LaBonte, with the explosion occurring in a secure area where personnel had gathered to debrief the bomber. Immediate response involved U.S. Air Force surgeons and teams rushing to stabilize the wounded amid a base-wide and heightened protocols. Efforts focused on and rapid transport of survivors to medical facilities, with confirmation of the suicide nature of the attack prompting swift containment measures to prevent further incursions. The swiftly claimed responsibility for the attack through spokesman , framing it as executed by an member to boost insurgent morale and against U.S. and allied operations. This assertion highlighted the event's value in demonstrating perceived vulnerabilities at forward bases, though subsequent details revealed the bomber's ties.

Investigations and Reforms

CIA Internal Review

Following the December 30, 2009, suicide bombing at Forward Operating Base Chapman, CIA Director commissioned an internal accountability review board comprising senior agency officials to examine the incident. The board's October 2010 report, while finding no individual misconduct warranting disciplinary action, pinpointed systemic lapses in source validation and adherence to protocols, including the decision to waive standard searches for the bomber, , based on his perceived value as a high-level asset providing unconfirmed on al-Qaeda leadership. These failures stemmed from overreliance on the asset's handler—a Jordanian —and insufficient cross-verification of his claims against independent data, which allowed the bomber to enter the CIA facility uninspected. The review critiqued the agency's processes in austere, high-threat environments, highlighting how assumptions about asset reliability had eroded empirical safeguards derived from prior operational data. In response, Panetta directed procedural reforms to prioritize verifiable over expediency, including mandatory physical searches and pat-downs for all visitors to CIA forward sites, irrespective of their asset status or sponsoring agency. Additional measures encompassed enhanced inter-agency vetting protocols requiring multiple corroborative checks before granting access waivers and reduced dependence on single-source, unconfirmed reporting in . These changes aimed to institutionalize stricter , drawing on incident-specific lessons to refine security postures without compromising core intelligence-gathering functions.

External Allegations and Controversies

A declassified U.S. from 2010, released in 2016, alleged that a Pakistani (ISI) officer paid $200,000 to members of the and an Afghan border commander to facilitate the December 30, 2009, suicide bombing at Forward Operating Base Chapman, enabling the attacker to gain access without thorough searches. The cable, based on U.S. intelligence reporting, described the payment as split between $100,000 for smuggling al-Balawi across the border and $100,000 for Haqqani facilitators, framing it as part of broader ISI support for Afghan insurgents despite public denials of ties to affiliates. Pakistani officials rejected the claims as baseless, asserting no involvement and highlighting ongoing counterterrorism cooperation with the U.S., while U.S. sources noted the allegations remained unproven in court but aligned with patterns of ISI-Haqqaani interactions documented in other declassified assessments. External critiques have focused on CIA practices, particularly the agency's growing dependence on local assets linked to drone strike intelligence, which some analysts argue created vulnerabilities exploited by double agents like al-Balawi, who was fast-tracked after providing purported tips on high-value targets amid escalating U.S. unmanned aerial operations in Pakistan's tribal areas. Al-Balawi, initially vetted through Jordanian intelligence as a sympathizer turned informant, was not subjected to standard body searches due to his claimed ideological alignment and promises of actionable data on , a decision critics from security think tanks described as emblematic of overreach in source handling that prioritized volume over rigorous validation, potentially fueling insurgent blowback from civilian casualties in drone campaigns. These practices yielded prior successes, such as targeting mid-level facilitators, but the Chapman incident underscored risks when informants with unverified access to sensitive sites were trusted without secondary corroboration, as evidenced by al-Balawi's pre-attack video vowing revenge for drone strikes. Debates over the attack have included allegations of undue political haste in intelligence operations following President Obama's December 2009 announcement of a 30,000-troop surge in , with conservative commentators arguing that demands for rapid counterterrorism results pressured field officers into riskier asset meetings absent adequate bureaucratic safeguards. In contrast, progressive critiques framed the incident within broader objections to prolonged U.S. entanglement, portraying CIA forward basing as symptomatic of that incentivized unvetted recruitments to sustain operational tempo amid escalating insurgency costs exceeding $100 billion annually by 2010. Such viewpoints, drawn from policy analyses, emphasize that while the surge aimed to reverse gains—evidenced by temporary reductions in attacks per U.S. metrics—the reliance on high-stakes informant meets without fortified protocols reflected systemic trade-offs between urgency and prudence, unsubstantiated by direct administration directives but inferred from the timing of expanded CIA roles.

Post-Attack Developments

Continued Operations

Following the 2009 suicide bombing, Forward Operating Base Chapman remained operational, serving as a key hub for CIA intelligence fusion and support for targeted operations in , a stronghold of the . In 2011, U.S. military leaders, including Chairman of the Admiral Mike Mullen, visited the base to honor fallen personnel at a , underscoring its ongoing role amid the U.S. surge. Infrastructure enhancements, such as improved connectivity in February 2011, were implemented to boost morale and operational efficiency, indicating sustained presence and activities. The base incorporated post-attack reforms, including stricter source vetting protocols, mandatory searches for all visitors, and enhanced biometric screening to mitigate insider threats, which helped maintain efficacy despite heightened risks. These adaptations supported intelligence gathering for drone strikes and targeting Haqqani and networks, contributing to disruptions in the region during the 2009–2014 surge period. CIA-backed units, such as the , operated from or in coordination with facilities like Chapman, conducting raids and patrols that pressured insurgents in eastern . Fortified perimeters, including reinforced barriers and persistent drone overwatch, were employed to counter mounting insurgent threats, including repeated attempts at infiltration and . While these measures sustained the base's contributions to intelligence-driven strikes—key to degrading Haqqani logistics and leadership—insurgent pressure intensified over the decade, reflecting broader challenges in .

Closure Following US Withdrawal

As part of the military drawdown in , which reduced troop levels to approximately 2,500 by January 2021 and culminated in a full withdrawal by August 31, 2021, Forward Operating Base Chapman was transferred to the control of prior to the Taliban's accelerated offensive. Specific details regarding the exact handover date for Chapman, a site with significant CIA involvement, have not been publicly disclosed in official U.S. military records, reflecting the classified nature of operations there. The base's transition occurred amid broader efforts to consolidate U.S. presence at major installations like , which U.S. forces vacated on July 2, 2021, leaving smaller forward operating bases reliant on Afghan partners for sustainment. Evacuation protocols prioritized the retrograde of U.S. personnel, sensitive equipment, and mission-critical assets, with minimal left intact to avoid aiding potential adversaries, though exact inventories for Chapman remain unverified publicly. Following the Afghan government's collapse, Taliban forces captured City, the provincial capital near Chapman, on August 15, 2021, effectively ending any residual Afghan control over the site. No subsequent U.S. access or operations at the base have been reported, underscoring the termination of American forward basing in southeastern and the shift to over-the-horizon capabilities.

Strategic Significance and Legacy

Contributions to Counterterrorism

Forward Operating Base Chapman, situated in near the border, functioned as a vital hub for CIA operations targeting , , and affiliated networks operating across the Afghanistan- frontier. CIA personnel at the base cultivated local agent networks that provided granular insights into militant safe houses, supply routes, and leadership movements in the Khost-Gardez corridor, a primary conduit for cross-border insurgent activities. These efforts focused on disrupting the , a potent syndicate responsible for attacks that killed dozens of U.S. and forces, by identifying high-value targets for subsequent neutralization. The base's forward positioning enabled direct debriefings and cross-verification of with partners, accelerating the intelligence-to-action cycle in ways unattainable from remote facilities. This proximity supported coordinated paramilitary raids and strikes, including expansions into Pakistan's tribal regions and Baluchistan by early 2009, which degraded enemy command structures and operational capabilities along the . On-site operations outperformed distant by incorporating cultural and contextual nuances from human sources, yielding higher-fidelity targeting data that informed joint against mid- and senior-level militants in southeastern . Despite inherent operational hazards, Chapman's agent-handling successes demonstrated the efficacy of embedded postures in penetrating hostile environments, countering assessments that overemphasize technological surveillance at the expense of ground-based networks. Sustained from the base contributed to a series of pre-2009 disruptions that hampered and in the region, affirming the causal linkage between persistent forward presence and tangible degradations in adversary effectiveness.

Criticisms and Lessons Learned

The attack at Forward Operating Base Chapman highlighted significant lapses in (HUMINT) vetting protocols, where the suicide bomber, , was granted access without a thorough physical search due to overconfidence in his provided intelligence on high-value targets like . CIA personnel failed to conduct a pat-down, partly because female officers present cited cultural sensitivities regarding searching a Muslim male, allowing al-Balawi to detonate explosives hidden on his person. This incident exposed incentive structures under political pressure for rapid successes, which prioritized source recruitment speed over empirical cross-verification, leading to unchecked in unvetted claims. Critics, including former CIA operatives, argued that the episode reflected deeper operational complacency, where base security routines were relaxed for a purportedly high-yield asset, despite warnings from Jordanian intelligence about potential unreliability that were not adequately disseminated. Broader analyses pointed to in , where initial focused efforts devolved into expansive commitments, diluting resources and exposing forward bases to unnecessary risks from prolonged ground engagements rather than precision strikes. Such distractions, rooted in policy trade-offs favoring indefinite occupations over targeted operations, contributed to vulnerabilities that exploited through infiltrated assets. Enduring lessons emphasized rigorous empirical validation of over narrative-driven haste, prompting post-2009 reforms like mandatory source searches, enhanced inter-agency vetting, and a pivot toward (UAV) strikes to minimize human exposure in contested areas. These changes correlated with reduced CIA field casualties in subsequent years, as data from declassified assessments showed fewer successful insider attacks on U.S. facilities after protocol overhauls. The incident underscored the causal pitfalls of politically accelerated timelines, advocating for structural incentives aligned with long-term threat realism rather than short-term operational gains.

References

  1. https://www.army.mil/article/3404/khowst_prt_winning_the_fight_in_afghanistan
  2. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA584341.pdf
  3. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-remarkable-case-of-the-triple-agent-and-the-bombing-in-khost-afghanistan/
  4. https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/2562675/pentagon-press-secretary-john-f-kirby-holds-a-press-briefing/
  5. https://greydynamics.com/camp-chapman-the-cias-frontline-in-afghanistan/
  6. https://www.mindat.org/loc-226352.html
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Geographical-location-of-Khost-Province-in-Afghanistan-and-the-current-physical_fig1_282441639
  8. https://en-us.topographic-map.com/map-s2brf3/Khost/
  9. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/01/world/asia/01khost.html
  10. https://en-us.topographic-map.com/map-dxwgkl/Khost-Province/
  11. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8436635.stm
  12. https://mapy.com/en/?source=osm&id=137481941
  13. https://www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryPorn/comments/g66gvn/photo_of_sgt_first_class_nathan_ross_chapman_an/
  14. https://community.apan.org/wg/tradoc-g2/operational-environment-and-threat-analysis-directorate/m/documents/212754/download
  15. https://history.army.mil/Portals/143/Images/Publications/Publication%2520By%2520Title%2520Images/M%2520Pdf/cmhPub_59-1_volI.pdf?ver=pjV4D5ULAOAowsmgbiMJYw%253D%253D
  16. https://www.start.umd.edu/publication/boomerang-opinion-versus-action-radicalization-abu-mulal-al-balawi
  17. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2010/1/6/cia-base-bomber-was-double-agent
  18. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/world/middleeast/10balawi.html
  19. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna34705029
  20. https://abcnews.go.com/WN/Afghanistan/bomber-lured-cia-meeting-met-zawahiri/story?id=9481034
  21. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/jan/04/afghanistan-cia-bomber-triple-agent
  22. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/world/asia/20intel.html
  23. https://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/01/12/cia.bombing/index.html
  24. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-11580571
  25. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/the-frantic-effort-to-save-lives-after-a-deadly-attack-on-the-cia/2019/12/29/275b828c-2729-11ea-ad73-2fd294520e97_story.html
  26. https://www.voanews.com/a/cia-faults-lax-security-for-afghan-base-attack--105380643/166517.html
  27. https://www.npr.org/2011/07/19/138158669/the-al-qaida-triple-agent-who-infiltrated-the-cia
  28. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/dec/31/taliban-cia-agents-killed-afghanistan
  29. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/cia-hunts-for-answers-after-deadly-afghanistan-attack
  30. https://www.facebook.com/ArlingtonNatl/posts/on-december-30-2009-in-khost-afghanistan-a-suicide-bomber-attacked-camp-chapman-/530865749074460/
  31. https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2010/10/panetta-touts-reforms-due-to-afghanistan-attack-030071
  32. https://www.washingtonian.com/2010/10/19/cia-releases-report-on-deadly-afghanistan-bombing/
  33. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/declassified-us-document-suggests-pakistani-link-to-attack-on-cia-agents-idUSKCN0XB2YN/
  34. https://www.voanews.com/a/declassified-document-suggests-pakistan-link-base-attack/3286834.html
  35. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/04/13/pakistani-spies-may-have-funded-2009-suicide-bombing-targeting-cia-outpost/
  36. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/15/afghanistan-chapman-bombing-pakistani-ties-cia-us-claims
  37. https://www.voanews.com/a/pakistan-rejects-allegation-of-plotting-on-cia-afghan-base/3287634.html
  38. https://www.npr.org/2010/03/16/124737760/what-the-khost-bombing-says-about-the-cia
  39. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/cia-backed-afghan-militias-fight-a-shadow-war/2015/12/02/fe5a0526-913f-11e5-befa-99ceebcbb272_story.html
  40. https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9151023/improved-internet-connectivity-boosts-morale-forward-operating-base-afghanistan
  41. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/ten-years-after-cia-operation-afghanistan-went-wrong-slain-agent-n1105826
  42. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09592318.2020.1777618
  43. https://www.americansecurityproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Ref-0241-The-Haqqani-Network.pdf
  44. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/State-AAR-AFG.pdf
  45. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/02/world/asia/afghanistan-bagram-us-withdrawal.html
  46. https://www.timesleaderonline.com/news/local-news/2021/08/the-latest-taliban-appear-inside-afghan-presidential-palace/
  47. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/US-Withdrawal-from-Afghanistan.pdf
  48. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB126225941186711671
  49. https://www.dw.com/en/failures-at-all-levels-undermining-us-spy-agencies-crackdown-on-terror/a-5089440
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.