Hubbry Logo
OptimismOptimismMain
Open search
Optimism
Community hub
Optimism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Optimism
Optimism
Optimism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Half a glass of water, illustration of two different mental attitudes, optimism (half full) and pessimism (half empty)

Optimism is the attitude or mindset of expecting events to lead to particularly positive, favorable, desirable, and hopeful outcomes. A common idiom used to illustrate optimism versus pessimism is a glass filled with water to the halfway point: an optimist is said to see the glass as half full, while a pessimist sees the glass as half empty. In ordinary English, optimism may be synonymous with idealism—often, unrealistic or foolish optimism in particular.

The term derives from the Latin optimum, meaning "best". To be optimistic, in the typical sense of the word, is to expect the best possible outcome from any given situation.[1] This is usually referred to in psychology as dispositional optimism. It reflects a belief that future conditions will work out for the best.[2] As a trait, it fosters resilience in the face of stress.[3]

Theories of optimism include dispositional models and models of explanatory style. Methods to measure optimism have been developed within both of these theoretical approaches, such as various forms of the Life Orientation Test for the original dispositional definition of optimism and the Attributional Style Questionnaire designed to test optimism in terms of explanatory style.

Variation in optimism between people is somewhat heritable[4] and reflects biological trait systems to some degree.[clarification needed][5] A person's optimism is also influenced by environmental factors, including family environment,[4] and may be learnable.[6][page needed] Optimism may also be related to health.[7]

Psychological optimism

[edit]

Dispositional optimism

[edit]
An optimist and a pessimist, Vladimir Makovsky, 1893

Researchers operationalize the term "optimism" differently depending on their research. As with any trait characteristic, there are several ways to evaluate optimism, such as the Life Orientation Test (LOT), an eight-item scale developed in 1985 by Michael Scheier and Charles Carver.[8]

Dispositional optimism and pessimism are typically assessed by asking people whether they expect future outcomes to be beneficial or negative (see below).[9] The LOT returns separate optimism and pessimism scores for each individual. Behaviourally,[clarification needed] these two scores correlate around r=0.5. Optimistic scores on this scale predict better outcomes in relationships,[10] higher social status,[11] and reduced loss of well-being following adversity.[12][page needed] Health-preserving behaviors are associated with[vague] optimism while health-damaging behaviors are associated with pessimism.[13]

Some have argued that optimism is the opposite end of a single dimension with pessimism,[14][page needed] with any distinction between them reflecting factors such as social desirability. Confirmatory modelling, however, supports a two-dimensional model[15] and the two dimensions predict different outcomes[clarification needed].[16] Genetic modelling confirms this independence, showing that pessimism and optimism are inherited as independent traits, with the typical correlation between them emerging as a result of a general well-being factor and family environment influences.[4] Patients with high dispositional optimism appear to have stronger immune systems since optimism buffers against psychological stressors.[17] Optimists appear to live longer.[18]

Explanatory style

[edit]

Explanatory style is distinct from dispositional theories of optimism. While related to life-orientation measures of optimism, attributional style[clarification needed] theory suggests that dispositional optimism and pessimism are reflections of the ways people explain events, i.e., that attributions cause these dispositions.[19] An optimist would view defeat as temporary, as something that does not apply to other cases, and as something that is not their fault.[20] Measures of attributional style distinguish three dimensions among explanations for events: Whether these explanations draw on internal versus external causes; whether the causes are viewed as stable versus unstable; and whether explanations apply globally versus being situationally specific. In addition, the measures distinguish attributions for positive and negative events.

Optimistic people attribute internal, stable, and global explanations to good things. Pessimistic explanations attribute these traits of stability, globality, and internality to negative events, such as relationship difficulty.[21] Models of optimistic and pessimistic attributions show that attributions themselves are a cognitive style – individuals who tend to focus on the global explanations do so for all types of events, and the styles correlate among each other. In addition, individuals vary in how optimistic their attributions are for good events and on how pessimistic their attributions are for bad events. Still, these two traits of optimism and pessimism are un-correlated.[22]

There is much debate about the relationship between explanatory style and optimism. Some researchers argue that optimism is simply the lay-term for what researchers know as explanatory style.[23] More commonly, it is found that explanatory style is distinct from dispositional optimism,[24] so the two should not be used interchangeably as they are marginally correlated at best. More research is required to "bridge" or further differentiate these concepts.[21]

Origins

[edit]
Optimistic personality (modified from[4])

As with all psychological traits, differences in both dispositional optimism and pessimism[4] and in attributional style[25] are heritable. Both optimism and pessimism are strongly influenced by environmental factors, including the family environment.[4] Optimism may be indirectly inherited as a reflection of underlying heritable traits such as intelligence, temperament, and alcoholism.[25] Evidence from twin studies shows that the inherited component of the dispositional optimism is about 25 percent, making this trait a stable personality dimension[26][page needed] and a predictor of life outcomes.[27] Its genetic origin interacts with environmental influences and other risks, to determine the vulnerability to depression across the lifespan.[28] Many theories assume optimism can be learned,[6] and research supports a modest role of family-environment acting to raise (or lower) optimism and lower (or raise) neuroticism and pessimism.[4]

Work utilising brain imaging and biochemistry suggests that at a biological trait level, optimism and pessimism reflect brain systems specialised for the tasks of processing and incorporating beliefs regarding good and bad information respectively.[5]

Assessment

[edit]

Life Orientation Test

[edit]

The Life Orientation Test (LOT) was designed by Scheier and Carver (1985)[full citation needed] to assess dispositional optimism – expecting positive or negative outcomes.[21] It is one of the more popular tests of optimism and pessimism. It was often used in early studies examining these dispositions' effects in health-related domains.[29] Scheier and Carver's initial research, which surveyed college students, found that optimistic participants were less likely to show an increase in symptoms like dizziness, muscle soreness, fatigue, blurred vision, and other physical complaints than pessimistic respondents.[30]

There are eight items and four filler items in the test. Four are positive items (e.g. "In uncertain times, I usually expect the best") and four are negative items e.g. "If something can go wrong for me, it will."[31] The LOT has been revised twice—once by the original creators (LOT-R) and also by Chang, Maydeu-Olivares, and D'Zurilla as the Extended Life Orientation Test (ELOT). The Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R) consists of six items, each scored on a five-point scale from "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree" and four filler items.[32] Half of the coded items are phrased optimistically, the other half in a pessimistic way. Compared with its previous iteration, LOT-R offers good internal consistency over time despite item overlaps, making the correlation between the LOT and LOT-R extremely high.[29]

Attributional Style Questionnaire

[edit]

The Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ)[33] is based on the explanatory style model of optimism. Subjects read a list of six positive and negative events (e.g. "you have been looking for a job unsuccessfully for some time"), and are asked to record a possible cause for the event. They then rate whether this is internal or external, stable or changeable, and global or local to the event.[33] There are several modified versions of the ASQ including the Expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire (EASQ), the Content Analysis of Verbatim Explanations (CAVE), and the ASQ designed for testing the optimism of children.[21]

Associations with health

[edit]

Optimism and health are correlated moderately.[34] Optimism explains between 5–10% of the variation in the likelihood of developing some health conditions (correlation coefficients between .20 and .30),[35] notably including cardiovascular disease,[36] stroke,[37] and depression.[38]

The relationship between optimism and health has also been studied with regard to physical symptoms, coping strategies, and negative effects for those suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, and fibromyalgia. Among individuals with these diseases, optimists are not more likely than pessimists to report pain alleviation due to coping strategies, despite differences in psychological well-being between the two groups.[39] A meta-analysis confirmed the assumption that optimism is related to psychological well-being: "Put simply, optimists emerge from difficult circumstances with less distress than do pessimists."[40] Furthermore, the correlation appears to be attributable to coping style: "That is, optimists seem intent on facing problems head-on, taking active and constructive steps to solve their problems; pessimists are more likely to abandon their effort to attain their goals."[40]

Optimists may respond better to stress: pessimists have shown higher levels of cortisol (the "stress hormone") and trouble regulating cortisol in response to stressors.[41] Another study by Scheier examined the recovery process for a number of patients that had undergone surgery.[42] The study showed that optimism was a strong predictor of the rate of recovery. Optimists achieved faster results in "behavioral milestones" such as sitting in bed, walking around, etc. They also were rated by staff as having a more favorable physical recovery. At a six-month follow-up, optimists were quicker to resume normal activities.

Optimism and well-being

[edit]

A number of studies have been done on optimism and psychological well-being. One 30-year study undertaken by Lee et al. (2019)[43] assessed the overall optimism and longevity of cohorts of men from the Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study and women from the Nurses' Health Study. The study found a positive correlation between higher levels of optimism and exceptional longevity, defined as a lifespan exceeding 85 years.

Another study conducted by Aspinwall and Taylor (1990)[full citation needed] assessed incoming freshmen on a range of personality factors such as optimism, self-esteem, locus of self-control, etc.[42] Freshmen who scored high on optimism before entering college had lower levels of psychological distress than their more pessimistic peers while controlling for the other personality factors. Over time, the more optimistic students were less stressed, less lonely, and less depressed than their pessimistic counterparts. This study suggests a strong link between optimism and psychological well-being.

Low optimism may help explain the association between caregivers' anger and reduced sense of vitality[clarification needed].[44]

A meta-analysis of optimism supported findings that optimism is positively correlated with life satisfaction, happiness,[45][better source needed] and psychological and physical well-being, and negatively correlated with depression and anxiety.[46]

Seeking to explain the correlation,[specify] researchers find that optimists choose healthier lifestyles. For example, optimists smoke less, are more physically active, consume more fruit, vegetables, and whole-grain bread, and are more moderate in alcohol consumption.[47]

Translating association into modifiability

[edit]

Research to date has demonstrated that optimists are less likely to have certain diseases[specify] or develop certain diseases[specify] over time. Research has not yet been able to demonstrate the ability to change an individual's level of optimism through psychological interventions, and thereby perhaps alter the course of disease or likelihood for development of disease.[citation needed]

An article by Mayo Clinic argues that steps to change self-talk from negative to positive may shift individuals from a negative to a more positive/optimistic outlook.[48] Strategies claimed to be of value include surrounding oneself with positive people, identifying areas of change, practicing positive self-talk, being open to humor, and following a healthy lifestyle.[48]

There is also the notion of "learned optimism" in positive psychology, which holds that joy is a talent that can be cultivated and can be achieved through specific actions such as challenging negative self talk or overcoming "learned helplessness".[49] However, criticism against positive psychology argues that it places too much importance on "upbeat thinking, while shunting challenging and difficult experiences to the side"—threatening to become toxic positivity.[50]

A study involving twins found that optimism is largely inherited at birth.[51] Along with the recognition that childhood experiences determine an individual's outlook, such studies demonstrate the genetic basis for optimism reinforces the recognized difficulty in changing or manipulating the direction of an adult's disposition from pessimist to optimist.[51]

Philosophical optimism

[edit]

One of the earliest forms of philosophical optimism was Socrates' theory of moral intellectualism, which formed part of his model of enlightenment through the process of self-improvement.[52] According to the philosopher, it is possible to live a virtuous life by attaining moral perfection through philosophical self-examination. He maintained that knowledge of moral truth is necessary and sufficient for leading a good life.[52] In his philosophical investigations, Socrates followed a model that did not merely focus on the intellect or reason but a balanced practice that also considered emotion as an important contributor to the richness of human experience.[53]

Distinct from a disposition to believe that things will work out, there is a philosophical idea that, perhaps in ways that may not be fully comprehended, the present moment is in an optimum state. This view that all of nature—past, present, and future—operates by laws of optimization along the lines of Hamilton's principle in the realm of physics is countered by views such as idealism, realism, and philosophical pessimism. Philosophers often link the concept of optimism with the name of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who held that we live in the best of all possible worlds (le meilleur des mondes possibles), or that God created a physical universe that applies the laws of physics.[clarification needed] The concept was also reflected in an aspect of Voltaire's early philosophy, one that was based on Isaac Newton's view that described a divinely ordered human condition.[54] This philosophy would also later emerge in Alexander Pope's Essay on Man.

Leibniz proposed that it was not God's power to create a perfect world, but he created the best among possible worlds.[55] In one of his writings, he responded to Blaise Pascal's philosophy of awe and desperation in the face of the infinite by claiming that infinity should be celebrated. While Pascal advocated for making man's rational aspirations more humble, Leibniz was optimistic about the capacity of human reason to extend itself further.[56]

This idea was mocked by Voltaire in his satirical novel Candide as baseless optimism of the sort exemplified by the beliefs of one of its characters, Dr. Pangloss, which are the opposite of his fellow traveller Martin's pessimism and emphasis on free will. The optimistic position is also called Panglossianism which became a term for excessive, even stupendous, optimism.[57] The phrase "panglossian pessimism" has been used[by whom?] to describe the pessimistic position that, since this is the best of all possible worlds, it is impossible for anything to get any better. Conversely, philosophical pessimism might be associated[by whom?] with an optimistic long-term view because it implies that no change for the worse is possible. Voltaire found it difficult to reconcile Leibniz's optimism with human suffering as demonstrated by the earthquake that devastated Lisbon in 1755 and the atrocities committed by the pre-revolutionary France against its people.[58]

Optimalism

[edit]

As defined by Nicholas Rescher, philosophical optimalism holds that this universe exists because it is better than the alternatives.[59] While this philosophy does not exclude the possibility of a deity, it also does not require one, and is compatible with atheism.[60] Rescher explained that the concept can stand on its own feet, arguing that there is no necessity to seeing optimalism realization as divinely instituted because it is a naturalistic theory in principle.[61]

Psychological optimalism, as defined by the positive psychologist Tal Ben-Shahar, means willingness to accept failure while remaining confident that success will follow, a positive attitude he contrasts with negative perfectionism.[62] Perfectionism can be defined as a persistent compulsive drive toward unattainable goals and valuation based solely in terms of accomplishment.[63] Perfectionists reject the realities and constraints of human ability. They cannot accept failures, delaying any ambitious and productive behavior in fear of failing again.[64] This neuroticism can even lead to clinical depression and low productivity.[65][better source needed] As an alternative to negative perfectionism, Ben-Shahar suggests the adoption of optimalism. Optimalism allows for failure in pursuit of a goal, and expects that while the trend of activity is towards the positive, it is not necessary always to succeed while striving towards goals. This basis in reality, prevents the optimalist from being overwhelmed in the face of failure.[62]

Optimalists accept failures and learn from them, encouraging further pursuit of achievement.[64] Ben-Shahar believes that optimalists and perfectionists show distinct motives. Optimalists tend to have more intrinsic, inward desires, with a motivation to learn, while perfectionists are highly motivated by a need to prove themselves worthy consistently.[62]

Two additional facets of optimalism have been described: product optimalism and process optimalism. The former is described as an outlook that seeks to realize the best possible result, while the latter seeks maximization of the chances of achieving the best possible result.[66]

Some sources also distinguish the concept from optimism since it does not focus on how things are going well but on whether things are going as well as possible.[67]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Optimism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Optimism is a multifaceted concept in and , denoting a positive orientation toward life events and the future, where individuals anticipate favorable outcomes and view challenges as surmountable. In psychological terms, it is defined as a stable individual difference reflecting generalized favorable expectancies for outcomes, contrasting with pessimism's focus on negative expectations. Philosophically, optimism emerged as a asserting that this world represents the best possible reality, a view most famously articulated by in his 1710 work , where he argued that God, being perfectly wise and benevolent, created the optimal world amid necessary imperfections. In psychology, optimism functions as a key component of , influencing mechanisms, resilience, and overall . Dispositional optimists tend to employ adaptive strategies such as problem-focused and when facing stress, leading to reduced emotional distress and better adjustment to adversity, as evidenced in studies of patients with chronic illnesses like cancer. This trait is reliably measured using tools like the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), which assesses agreement with statements indicating positive future expectancies, and it correlates independently with outcomes beyond related constructs like extraversion or . Research consistently links higher optimism to tangible benefits, including a 9-30% lower of coronary heart disease progression and faster recovery from surgeries, due to behaviors like proactive health management and lower markers. Socioeconomically, optimists exhibit greater educational persistence and higher lifetime earnings, with each unit increase on optimism scales predicting approximately $32,667 more in income over time. Philosophically, optimism traces back to ancient thinkers but crystallized in the Enlightenment through Leibniz's metaphysical framework, which posits and as privations of good that ultimately contribute to a harmonious whole, ensuring the world's maximal . This "" thesis aimed to reconcile the existence of with , drawing on Augustinian ideas of as non-being, but it faced sharp critique for appearing to trivialize human . Voltaire's 1759 satirical novel lampooned Leibnizian optimism as absurdly complacent, using events like the to illustrate how such a view ignores empirical horrors, a perspective echoed by later philosophers like Schopenhauer who deemed the world the worst possible. Despite these rebuttals, modern philosophical discussions revive "rational optimism" as a tempered in through reason, distinct from naive positivity, influencing and existential thought. Beyond these core domains, optimism intersects with and , where interdisciplinary projects explore its role in fostering and ethical action, as seen in analyses combining philosophical with psychological data to promote societal resilience. While excessive optimism can lead to unrealistic or of risks, moderate levels are broadly adaptive, underscoring its enduring relevance in understanding human and worldview.

Psychological Perspectives

Dispositional Optimism

Dispositional optimism refers to a trait defined as the generalized and relatively enduring expectation that positive outcomes will occur across important life domains, rather than being influenced by transient situational factors. Introduced by psychologists Michael F. Scheier and Charles S. Carver in 1985, this construct draws from , positing that individuals vary in their tendency to hold favorable outcome expectancies that guide goal pursuit and persistence. Unlike temporary optimism in response to specific events, dispositional optimism operates as a broad dispositional orientation, influencing how people approach challenges and opportunities in diverse contexts such as work, relationships, and . Individuals high in dispositional optimism characteristically emphasize the potential benefits of situations and adopt proactive strategies, such as problem-solving and , to navigate difficulties effectively. In contrast, those low in this trait tend to foresee obstacles and drawbacks, often leading to more avoidance-oriented responses or resignation when faced with adversity. This difference in focus shapes behavioral patterns: optimists maintain effort toward goals even amid setbacks, viewing them as surmountable, while pessimists may disengage earlier due to anticipated failure. These characteristics highlight dispositional optimism's role as an adaptive trait that promotes resilience without requiring constant positive circumstances. Longitudinal studies underscore the temporal stability of dispositional , indicating it functions as a reliable dimension rather than a fluctuating state. For instance, tracking large samples has reported test-retest s of approximately 0.60 to 0.70 over intervals spanning several years, demonstrating moderate to high consistency even as events unfold. One such investigation involving nearly 5,000 participants found a of 0.61 over an of six years, with stability varying slightly by age but remaining robust in midlife. This enduring quality supports its classification as a core trait, akin to other stable individual differences like extraversion. Dispositional optimism differs from unrealistic optimism, a involving exaggerated positive expectations that often deny or minimize risks to maintain favorable self-views. In Scheier and Carver's framework, high dispositional optimists hold realistic positive outlooks, acknowledging threats while actively addressing them through goal-directed actions, rather than through defensive denial or . This realistic orientation fosters adaptive functioning, as optimists balance with practical engagement. While related to —a cognitive process concerning attributions for past events—dispositional optimism centers on forward-looking expectations across domains. It is typically measured using standardized self-report scales designed for trait assessment.

Explanatory Style

Explanatory style refers to the habitual cognitive framework individuals use to attribute causes to positive and negative life events, structured along three key dimensions: internal (caused by the self) versus external (caused by outside factors), stable (enduring over time) versus unstable (temporary), and global (affecting many areas of life) versus specific (limited to the situation). This approach emerged from Martin Seligman's research on in the mid-1970s, where initial studies demonstrated how uncontrollable stressors could lead to passivity and motivational deficits in humans. The concept evolved to emphasize how attributions shape emotional and behavioral responses to adversity. A pivotal advancement came with the reformulated learned helplessness model proposed by Lyn Y. Abramson, Martin E. P. Seligman, and John D. Teasdale in 1978, which integrated attribution theory to explain individual differences in vulnerability to helplessness and depression. In this model, determines the severity and persistence of negative outcomes following uncontrollable events. An optimistic attributes bad events—such as failures or setbacks—to external, unstable, and specific causes, minimizing their perceived impact and encouraging recovery. In contrast, good events are attributed to internal, stable, and global causes, enhancing and motivation. The opposite pessimistic style attributes bad events to internal, stable, and global causes, fostering a sense of chronic helplessness, while good events are seen as external, unstable, and specific, limiting positive reinforcement. This pattern in the pessimistic style heightens vulnerability to depression by promoting hopelessness and cognitive deficits. For illustration, consider a rejection, such as a being declined by a journal: an individual with an optimistic style might explain it as due to the editor's temporary oversight or a specific mismatch (external, unstable, specific), preserving for future efforts, whereas a pessimist might view it as stemming from their own pervasive incompetence (internal, stable, global), leading to withdrawal and despair. This attributional pattern underscores how influences resilience, with research linking pessimistic styles to poorer outcomes over time. is commonly assessed using the Attributional Style Questionnaire, a tool that presents hypothetical scenarios to measure these dimensions. It also contributes to broader traits like dispositional optimism by shaping habitual positive expectations.

Optimism Bias

The , also known as unrealistic optimism, refers to the cognitive tendency for individuals to overestimate the likelihood of positive future events and underestimate the likelihood of negative events occurring to themselves compared to their peers. This bias was first systematically identified in a 1980 study where college students judged their personal risks for various negative life events, such as accidents or illnesses, as significantly lower than those of average peers, with mean comparative risk estimates showing a -20.4% deviation from objective probabilities. Several mechanisms underlie this bias, including self-positivity, where individuals apply more favorable assumptions to themselves than to others; , which leads to over-reliance on personal information while underweighting others' experiences; and errors in comparative judgment, such as underestimating peers' control over events. These processes result in asymmetric evaluations, where self-relevant risks are minimized through selective focus on controllable or less salient factors. Representative examples illustrate the bias in everyday contexts. Among smokers, many exhibit unrealistic optimism by estimating their personal risk of developing as lower than that of other smokers, despite equivalent exposure levels, which sustains continued use. Similarly, drivers often overestimate their own safe driving behaviors and underestimate their accident risk relative to peers, leading to reduced adherence to precautions like seatbelt use or speed limits. The consequences of include impaired , as individuals may ignore risks in areas like or , resulting in inadequate preparation or excessive risk-taking. However, moderate levels of this bias can foster by encouraging toward goals without undue discouragement from potential setbacks. In financial contexts, it contributes to overconfidence, where investors overestimate returns and underestimate losses, amplifying market bubbles or personal portfolio volatility. Recent research by Sharot and colleagues has revealed neural underpinnings of the , showing asymmetric processing where the integrates desirable information more readily than undesirable news, with heightened activity in the and rostral during positive future simulations. This selective updating persists even when confronted with contradictory evidence, as demonstrated in studies from 2007 to 2011, linking the to diminished neural responses to . Dispositional optimism may amplify these effects by predisposing individuals to stronger biased interpretations.

Developmental and Cultural Origins

Dispositional optimism begins to emerge in , with children as young as 3 to 6 years old demonstrating an by overestimating positive outcomes and underestimating negative ones in self-relevant predictions. This bias is particularly pronounced in younger children and gradually refines with age as they better integrate probabilistic information, suggesting a developmental trajectory from hyperoptimism to more tempered expectations. Secure attachments formed through positive parent-child relationships play a key role, with attachment security in late childhood (around age 10) predicting higher optimism in via an internal . Longitudinal twin studies indicate that accounts for approximately 25-30% of the variance in optimism, highlighting a genetic component alongside environmental influences. Environmental factors significantly shape optimism's development, with positive from caregivers and stable socioeconomic conditions fostering resilient outlooks. For instance, parental , academic success, and peer acceptance in early contribute to higher levels of optimism by providing affirming experiences that build . Children in supportive environments receive consistent encouragement, which models optimistic responses to challenges and reinforces adaptive coping, contrasting with adversity-exposed youth who may develop more cautious perspectives. Cultural origins of optimism vary markedly between individualistic and collectivist societies, influencing the expression and valuation of optimistic tendencies. In Western individualistic cultures, such as those , optimism is often characterized by self-enhancement and unrealistic positive biases, aligning with personal agency and independence. Conversely, collectivist societies in , like and , emphasize realistic optimism tied to interdependence and harmony, resulting in lower dispositional optimism scores and reduced self-serving biases compared to Western counterparts. These differences stem from practices that prioritize group well-being over individual acclaim, leading to more balanced expectations in interdependent contexts. The historical context of optimism traces to pre-modern philosophical traditions and gained modern prominence through . , originating in and , promoted a rational optimism rooted in accepting what is within one's control while cultivating amid uncertainty, influencing enduring views on resilience. Similarly, in ancient advocated realistic optimism through ethical and social harmony, reconciling hope with pragmatic realism to navigate life's adversities. In the late 20th century, Martin Seligman's 1998 inauguration of as APA president formalized optimism as a learnable trait central to , shifting focus from pathology to strengths. Recent post-2020 research highlights how the affected optimism development in , with secure and social connectedness buffering declines in optimistic outlooks amid disruptions. Longitudinal studies show that adolescents with strong maternal support maintained higher optimism levels, mediating better adjustment to pandemic stressors like isolation and uncertainty. Despite challenges, many young people reported sustained or resilient optimism, linked to adaptive behaviors and reduced depressive symptoms, underscoring environmental plasticity in this trait during crises.

Assessment Tools

One of the primary instruments for assessing dispositional optimism is the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), a 10-item self-report scale developed by Scheier and Carver in 1985 and revised in 1994 to enhance its focus on generalized positive outcome expectancies. The LOT-R includes three items measuring (e.g., "In uncertain times, I usually expect the best"), three measuring (reverse-scored), and four filler items, with responses on a 5-point from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Total scores range from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate greater after reverse-scoring the pessimism items. The LOT-R demonstrates adequate internal consistency, with approximately 0.74 in initial validation samples, and test-retest reliability over four weeks ranging from 0.68 to 0.79. Its validity is supported by predictive correlations with adaptive strategies, such as positive reinterpretation and , in response to stressors. For measuring explanatory style related to optimism, the Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ), introduced by Peterson et al. in 1982, is a widely used 48-item tool consisting of 12 hypothetical scenarios (six positive and six negative events). Respondents rate causal attributions for each event across three dimensions—internality, stability, and globality—on 7-point scales, yielding composite scores for an optimism index (e.g., lower internal-stable-global attributions for negative events indicate optimism). The ASQ shows moderate internal reliability (alphas around 0.50–0.70 for subscales) and has been validated through associations with depression onset and resilience outcomes. Another established measure is the Optimism-Pessimism Scale (OPS), derived from the (MMPI) using to identify items reflecting , as developed by Colligan et al. in 1994. The original OPS comprises 36 items (18 optimistic and 18 pessimistic), scored dichotomously or on a continuum, with higher optimism scores linked to lower in clinical samples; a revised version (PSM-R) refines this to 52 content-scored items for improved precision. Brief versions of these tools, such as a 12-item ASQ adaptation or shortened LOT-R subscales, are available for efficient clinical screening, maintaining acceptable reliability (alphas >0.70). Despite their utility, these self-report measures are susceptible to response biases, including social desirability and retrospective distortion, which can inflate optimism estimates. Cultural adaptations are often required, as initial validations were primarily in Western samples, with lower reliability observed in non-English versions without translation adjustments.

Health and Well-Being Outcomes

Optimism has been consistently linked to improved physical health outcomes, particularly in cardiovascular health. A prospective study of older men found that an optimistic explanatory style was associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease, with optimists demonstrating up to a 35% reduced incidence compared to pessimists. Meta-analyses further support this, showing that higher optimism levels correlate with a 35% decrease in cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality across large cohorts. Additionally, optimism facilitates faster recovery from surgery; studies indicate that patients with optimistic expectations prior to procedures experience better quality-of-life outcomes, including reduced complications and quicker return to function. In , optimism serves as a protective factor against depression and anxiety. Longitudinal research demonstrates that higher dispositional optimism predicts a decline in depressive symptoms over several weeks, with optimistic individuals reporting lower levels of anxiety and greater overall . For instance, optimism scores from validated assessments like the Life Orientation Test prospectively forecast reduced risk of mood disorders, contributing to sustained emotional stability. Regarding broader well-being, optimism buffers against stress through proactive strategies, enabling individuals to approach challenges with persistence and resourcefulness. A of optimism's effects revealed a moderate association with enhanced positive affect ( d ≈ 0.30), underscoring its role in promoting and resilience. Recent studies from 2023 to 2025 highlight optimism's benefits in specific contexts. Among cancer survivors post-radiotherapy, higher optimism levels were associated with lower rates of (PTSD) symptoms and improved trajectories. Research from in 2025 showed that optimism promoted resilience during the , helping individuals maintain amid prolonged stressors. Furthermore, a 2025 study in identified an inverse relationship between optimism and social media addiction, with optimistic traits reducing vulnerability to excessive use and its associated distress. These outcomes are mediated by mechanisms such as enhanced immune function and better behavioral adherence to treatments. Optimism correlates with stronger immune responses, including higher production during stressors, which supports overall physiological resilience. It also predicts greater adherence to regimens, as seen in post-acute coronary syndrome patients where optimistic outlooks led to improved compliance and emotional functioning six months later.

Interventions and Modifiability

Cognitive-behavioral techniques, such as reframing attributions through the ABC model in (REBT), target irrational beliefs to promote more optimistic explanatory styles by disputing negative interpretations of events. The ABC model posits that activating events (A) lead to beliefs (B) that elicit consequences (C), with interventions focusing on restructuring maladaptive beliefs to foster adaptive, optimistic responses. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate the efficacy of REBT in enhancing optimism, with meta-analyses reporting medium effect sizes (d = 0.58) for psychological outcomes, including improved positive expectancies. Positive psychology interventions, including gratitude journaling and best possible self (BPS) visualization, cultivate optimism by directing attention to positive aspects of life and possibilities. Gratitude journaling involves regularly noting things one is thankful for, which builds a habit of positive focus and has been shown to increase optimistic outlook over time. The BPS exercise, originally validated in King (2001), requires individuals to vividly imagine and write about their ideal self after effortful achievement, leading to significant boosts in optimism and positive affect. Systematic reviews confirm that BPS interventions, often delivered in 1- to 8-week formats, reliably elevate scores on optimism measures like the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) and enhance overall . Evidence indicates that optimism is substantially malleable through targeted training, with dispositional optimism reflecting generalized expectancies that can shift via environmental and therapeutic influences. Carver et al. (2010) highlight how explanatory styles underlying optimism respond to longitudinal changes, such as through repeated positive experiences or , supporting its adaptability beyond fixed traits. Studies suggest that 30-50% of variance in optimism may be attributable to malleable factors like learned behaviors, allowing for meaningful gains via interventions. Recent advances include (ACT)-based programs tailored for youth, which integrate and value-driven actions to build optimism and reduce symptoms. A 2025 longitudinal study found that an ACT-based intervention significantly increased optimism (ηp² = 0.11 at post-test, sustained at follow-up with ηp² = 0.18) and reduced anxiety (ηp² = 0.20) among university students, with effects persisting up to two years. In workplace settings, Psychological Capital (PsyCap) training, encompassing optimism alongside , , and resilience, has been reviewed over 25 years as effective for enhancing employee performance and well-being through structured workshops and goal-oriented exercises. Meta-analyses of PsyCap interventions across diverse occupations show consistent improvements in optimistic attributions, contributing to reduced burnout and higher . Despite these benefits, interventions can encounter challenges, particularly among individuals with high baseline , where generic approaches may elicit resistance or minimal engagement, underscoring the need for tailored strategies like personalized feedback or combined therapies. Assessment tools such as the LOT-R can monitor progress to refine these adaptations.

Quotes and Affirmations for an Optimistic Mindset

Optimistic quotes and affirmations serve as tools in positive psychology and cognitive-behavioral interventions to reinforce positive thinking patterns, promote hope, and enhance an optimistic outlook. These expressions can be incorporated into daily practices, journaling, visualization exercises, or therapeutic sessions to support the development and maintenance of optimism. Quotes:
  • "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." – Winston Churchill
  • "Keep your face always toward the sunshine—and shadows will fall behind you." – Walt Whitman
  • "Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement. Nothing can be done without hope and confidence." – Helen Keller
  • "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds; and the pessimist fears this is true." – James Branch Cabell
  • "Perpetual optimism is a force multiplier." – Colin Powell
Affirmations:
  • I choose to see the positive in every situation.
  • Every day brings new opportunities for growth and happiness.
  • I am capable, strong, and full of potential.
  • My positive thoughts create positive outcomes.
  • I attract good things into my life with my optimistic mindset.
These examples focus on possibility, resilience, and positivity, and can be adapted within interventions such as best possible self visualization or gratitude practices to strengthen optimistic explanatory styles and dispositional expectancies.

Philosophical Perspectives

Historical Development

The roots of philosophical optimism trace back to thought, where concepts of emphasized balance and rational control over perceptions. , in his , conceived —often translated as or —as the highest good, achieved through virtuous activity in accordance with reason over a complete life. This ideal balanced hope with realism via the doctrine of the golden mean, positing ethical virtues as intermediates between excess and deficiency, such as lying between rashness and cowardice, thereby fostering a positive yet grounded outlook on potential. Similarly, Stoic philosophers like advanced as attainable through virtue alone, stressing that individuals could secure tranquility by controlling their judgments and assents to impressions, rather than external events, in alignment with a rational cosmic order. In the medieval period, Christian thinkers integrated these ancient ideas with theological , portraying the world as inherently providential and directed toward divine ends. , in the 13th century, synthesized Aristotelian —where all things act for a purpose—with Christian doctrine, arguing that the universe is a finite creation ex nihilo, governed by God's eternal providence to manifest divine goodness and glory. For Aquinas, this ordered hierarchy, with humans and angels preeminent, ensured that no events occur without aim, as free actions harmonize with God's preordained plan, instilling an optimistic view of existence as purposeful and benevolent under divine wisdom. The Enlightenment marked a shift toward secular optimism, propelled by scientific advancements that revealed an intelligible natural order. Building on the 17th-century , thinkers celebrated empirical methods and mathematical laws as tools for human progress and emancipation from superstition, viewing the as an era of unparalleled intellectual advancement. contributed to this optimism in his 1762 work , asserting that humans are innately good and that societal corruption distorts this natural benevolence, advocating education to nurture inherent moral sentiments for personal and communal improvement. In the 18th and 19th centuries, Isaac Newton's (1687) reinforced views of a harmonious, mathematically governed , inspiring Enlightenment figures like to promote confidence in reason's ability to comprehend and enhance the world. This post-Newtonian optimism contrasted sharply with emerging Romantic pessimism, as philosophers like Schopenhauer emphasized irrational forces, existential discord, and toward unchecked progress amid industrialization and social upheavals. The 20th century saw existentialist challenges to such optimism, exemplified by ' absurdism, which confronted life's lack of inherent meaning as a call to lucid revolt rather than illusory hope. Camus critiqued optimistic evasions like religious or utopian promises, urging acceptance of the present amid absurdity, marking a philosophical pivot that influenced later explorations of human resilience. This historical trajectory provides broader context for philosophical optimism, including key formalizations such as Leibniz's .

Leibniz's Principle

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's doctrine of the "best of all possible worlds" forms the foundational pillar of philosophical optimism, positing that the universe we inhabit is the optimal one conceivable among infinite possibilities. As a perfect and omnipotent creator, God selected this world because it maximizes overall harmony and goodness while minimizing evil, ensuring that no better alternative exists. This core idea is elaborated in Leibniz's Theodicy (1710), where he argues theologically that divine perfection necessitates the choice of the most excellent world, and in his Monadology (1714), where he develops the metaphysical framework supporting this optimism. Leibniz's arguments rest on several key principles. The principle of sufficient reason asserts that nothing occurs without a reason sufficient to explain it, implying that God's choice of this world must be justified by its superiority over all others. Complementing this is the concept of pre-established harmony among monads—simple, indivisible substances that constitute reality—each reflecting the entire universe from its unique perspective, thus achieving a cosmic order without direct causation between substances. Evil, far from contradicting divine goodness, is necessary for the greater good; it serves as a contrast that enhances positive qualities, much like shadows define light in a . For instance, natural disasters or personal sufferings contribute to the world's overall perfection by enabling virtues like resilience and . The implications of Leibniz's principle extend to a rational basis for and in the face of adversity. Apparent evils, such as earthquakes or failings, are not arbitrary flaws but integral elements that fulfill higher purposes within the divine plan, encouraging individuals to view existence with rather than despair. This perspective famously encapsulates in Leibniz's assertion: "This is the ," providing a metaphysical justification for cosmic optimism that aligns human reason with theological . Leibniz's doctrine profoundly influenced Enlightenment by offering a rational defense of providence against about , portraying the as a meticulously designed worthy of admiration. However, it also drew sharp literary critique, most notably in Voltaire's (1759), which satirizes the idea through the protagonist's naive adherence to optimism amid Lisbon's devastating . Despite such responses, the principle endures as a seminal contribution to philosophical thought on optimism.

Criticisms and Responses

One of the most prominent early critiques of Leibnizian optimism emerged in Voltaire's satirical novel (1759), where the character Dr. Pangloss embodies the philosophy by repeatedly asserting that "all is for the best in the ," even as characters endure catastrophes like wars, plagues, and personal losses. This directly targets Leibniz's claim of pre-established , portraying it as absurdly detached from human suffering. Voltaire drew particular inspiration from the , which killed between 10,000 and 50,000 people, using it in the novel to illustrate how undermine the idea of an optimally designed world. In the , developed a deeper philosophical opposition in The World as Will and Representation (), arguing that existence is dominated by a blind, insatiable "will" that generates endless striving and suffering, making optimism a dangerous that ignores life's inherent pain. Schopenhauer dismissed optimistic views as superficial consolations, insisting that true insight reveals the world as the "worst of all possible worlds," where temporary satisfactions only prelude renewed desire and torment. Existential thinkers offered further challenges to rational optimism. , in works like (1843), critiqued reliance on objective reason or systematic philosophy for addressing life's absurdities, proposing instead a "" as a subjective, passionate commitment that transcends rational assurances of a harmonious world. Similarly, condemned optimism as intertwined with "slave morality," a resentful ethic originating in thought that promotes pity and otherworldly hope to cope with suffering, thereby stifling life's affirmative vitality and the "." Defenders of optimism have responded through evolving theological frameworks. In , pioneered by in (1929), the universe is seen as a dynamic process of creative advance where influences but does not coerce events, allowing for an evolving optimality that incorporates and mitigates the without assuming static perfection. Complementing this, the , articulated by thinkers like , posits that moral evil stems from human choices essential for genuine goodness, enabling a world where free agents can achieve greater value despite risks of wrongdoing. The 20th century's , with its systematic extermination of six million , intensified challenges to absolute optimism by exemplifying industrialized evil that defies justification as part of the "best possible world." In response, resilient has emerged as a partial counter, emphasizing human agency, ethical , and capacity for renewal in the face of atrocity, without resorting to metaphysical theodicies but affirming progress through rational compassion and .

Optimalism and Modern Variants

Optimalism represents a philosophical stance that seeks to harmonize optimism with realism, emphasizing the pursuit of the best possible outcomes while acknowledging inherent imperfections and uncertainties in the world. Unlike traditional optimism, which may assume an inherently benevolent or guaranteed positive results, optimalism advocates striving for improvement without the delusion that perfection is attainable or that all endeavors will succeed. This approach, articulated by Tal , distinguishes "optimalism" as a form of positive perfectionism that accepts as a learning opportunity and focuses on growth rather than unattainable ideals. It contrasts sharply with blind optimism by grounding expectations in evidence-based realism, thereby fostering resilience and in the face of setbacks. Key features of optimalism include its acceptance of imperfection as an integral part of endeavor, coupled with a proactive commitment to incremental . Proponents argue that this balanced perspective avoids the pitfalls of excessive , which can lead to inaction, and unchecked optimism, which risks disappointment or poor decision-making. By integrating realistic assessments with aspirational goals, optimalism encourages individuals and societies to pursue excellence through iterative efforts, learning from errors to refine strategies over time. In modern philosophical discourse, optimalism has evolved into various rational variants that refine optimism's application across domains. A 2024 analysis proposes a four-fold of optimistic beliefs—groundless optimism (positive expectations without epistemic grounds), resourced optimism (grounded in personal resources like or finances), agentive optimism (based on personal effort and commitment), and perspectival optimism (a focus on positive aspects rather than a belief about the future)—arguing that such beliefs can be rationally justified when evidence-supported and contextually appropriate. This framework highlights how rational optimism, as a variant of optimalism, enhances without veering into . Contemporary applications of optimalism appear prominently in the philosophy of progress, where it underscores the potential for human advancement through deliberate, evidence-informed efforts rather than inevitable teleological improvement. In climate ethics, thinkers like Roy Scranton critique the limits of unbridled optimism and advocate ethical pessimism that recognizes technological and societal constraints while pursuing sustainable adaptations to environmental challenges. Similarly, discussions of techno-optimism in , including AI ethics, advocate for modest approaches that incorporate ethical safeguards and human agency, ensuring that advancements in prioritize human well-being and equity over unchecked progress. Optimalism draws significant influences from positive psychology, particularly Martin Seligman's work on learned optimism, which integrates realistic to cultivate adaptive outlooks that align with optimalist principles of balanced striving. Additionally, Cornel West's 2020s discussions explore the interplay between and optimism, emphasizing as an active, courageous commitment amid crises like the coronavirus pandemic and , in contrast to passive optimistic expectations.

Biological and Neurological Foundations

Brain Mechanisms

Optimism, as a psychological trait, is underpinned by distinct neural mechanisms that facilitate a positive bias in processing future events and emotional stimuli. The (PFC), particularly its orbitofrontal and ventromedial regions, plays a central role in regulating optimism by modulating emotional responses and decision-making toward favorable outcomes. studies indicate that higher trait optimism correlates with increased PFC activity during tasks involving anticipation of positive scenarios, enabling better integration of rewarding information into belief formation. Recent 2025 research using intersubject representational similarity analysis has shown that optimists exhibit more uniform neural representations in the medial PFC when projecting future events, emphasizing positive scenarios. Additionally, the contributes to this bias through hemispheric asymmetry, with greater left amygdala activation observed in individuals exhibiting optimism when imagining future events, as demonstrated in fMRI experiments where positive projections elicited enhanced neural responses compared to negative ones. Neurotransmitter systems further support these regional dynamics. Dopamine, released in the ventral striatum during reward anticipation, amplifies optimistic tendencies; optimists display heightened ventral striatal activity when processing potential gains, and pharmacological enhancement of dopamine via L-DOPA has been shown to strengthen this bias by increasing the salience of positive information. Serotonin modulates mood to sustain optimism, with variations in the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR) linked to greater optimism through enhanced positive affective processing and reduced rumination on negatives. Electroencephalography (EEG) evidence reinforces this, revealing frontal alpha asymmetry—greater left-hemisphere activity—in optimistic individuals, which corresponds to an attentional bias favoring positive stimuli over neutral or negative ones during emotional processing tasks. Recent research highlights optimism's influence on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, a key stress response pathway. Studies from 2023 utilizing hair cortisol analysis found that higher dispositional optimism associates with lower chronic cortisol levels, suggesting reduced HPA axis hyperactivity and attenuated physiological stress responses. Neural plasticity underlies optimism's modifiability, as interventions like mindfulness meditation promote structural changes, including increased PFC gray matter thickness and enhanced connectivity between the PFC and amygdala, which bolster optimistic outlooks by improving emotional regulation. In clinical contexts, disruptions in these mechanisms manifest in disorders like depression, where lower optimism correlates with right-hemisphere dominance, characterized by hyperactive right frontal activity and reduced left-hemisphere engagement. This asymmetry impairs positive bias maintenance, contributing to pessimistic belief updating and heightened negative focus, as evidenced by diminished left responses in depressed individuals during reward-related tasks.

Evolutionary Perspectives

Optimism has been proposed to confer adaptive advantages in evolutionary contexts by encouraging risk-taking behaviors essential for and in unpredictable environments. In ancestral societies, where resources were scarce and threats frequent, optimistic biases likely promoted persistence in exploration and pursuit of opportunities, such as venturing into new territories for food or mates, despite potential dangers. This trait enhanced survival and by outweighing the costs of occasional failures with the benefits of seized opportunities. A key theoretical framework explaining optimism's evolution is (EMT), which posits that cognitive biases arise from asymmetric error costs in under uncertainty. According to EMT, it is evolutionarily advantageous to err on the side of overestimating positive outcomes—such as the availability of resources or successful —rather than underestimating them, as the cost of missing a beneficial opportunity (false negative) often exceeds the cost of unnecessary effort (false positive). Haselton and Nettle (2006) integrated this into the "paranoid optimist" model, where optimism co-evolves with vigilance to s, balancing opportunity pursuit with threat avoidance to optimize fitness in ancestral environments. For instance, in contexts, overperceiving sexual interest minimizes missed reproductive chances, a bias observed across studies with high reliability. Empirical evidence supports optimism's evolutionary roots through cross-species comparisons, particularly in , where optimistic biases appear in responses to uncertain rewards. primates, such as bonobos, exhibit increased optimistic decision-making after exposure to positive like , suggesting an ancient mechanism for that enhances group cohesion and resource-seeking in variable habitats. Genetic underpinnings further indicate , with twin studies estimating optimism's genetic contribution at approximately 30%, and optimism itself linked to and adaptive resilience across populations. However, evolutionary trade-offs exist, as excessive optimism can function as a costly signal in social groups, leading to overinvestment in risky endeavors that deplete s without returns. In stable environments, selection pressures favor a balance with realism to avoid such inefficiencies, preventing optimism from becoming maladaptive. Recent socio-biological ties these dynamics to modern behaviors; for example, a 2025 study across the U.S., U.K., and 14 European countries found that dispositional optimism significantly boosts financial —equivalent to an additional $1,352 for households with savings of $8,000—mirroring ancestral hoarding strategies under . Post-pandemic analyses from 2024 also highlight selection for optimistic traits in fostering resilience, with pre-pandemic optimists showing lower stress during crises, underscoring ongoing adaptive value.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4161121/
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371530888_Philosophical_Optimism_and_the_Philosophy_of_Leibniz
  3. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11406-024-00758-w
  4. https://www.templeton.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/JTF-Hope-Optimism.pdf
  5. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1986-19862-001
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6309621/
  7. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-62311-005
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661314000333
  9. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1379651/full
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11222382/
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4061570/
  12. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1975-25477-001
  13. https://positivepsychology.com/explanatory-styles-optimism/
  14. https://ppc.sas.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/lhreformulation.pdf
  15. https://ppc.sas.upenn.edu/resources/questionnaires-researchers/attributional-style-questionnaire
  16. https://vittoriodublinoblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/weinstein_unrealistic-optimism-about-future-life-events.pdf
  17. https://people.clas.ufl.edu/shepperd/files/PsychBelgica2002.pdf
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8516914_Egocentrism_Event_Frequency_and_Comparative_Optimism_When_What_Happens_Frequently_Is_More_Likely_to_Happen_to_Me
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7999169_Smokers%27_unrealistic_optimism_about_their_risk
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0001457589900249
  21. https://www.scribbr.com/research-bias/optimism-bias/
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845022000151
  23. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06280
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3204264/
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4467896/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11315462/
  27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101201
  28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025418820629
  29. https://psychology.town/applied-positive-psychology/how-optimism-develops-socialization-environment/
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11554648/
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354869933_Examining_the_Measurement_Invariance_of_the_LOT-R_Measure_of_Optimism_in_the_United_States_and_Japan
  32. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199401)50:1%3C71::AID-JCLP6%3E3.0.CO;2-7
  33. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199505)51:3%3C330::AID-JCLP7%3E3.0.CO;2-O
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28450893/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6220921/
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11719629/
  37. https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(22)00075-4/fulltext
  38. https://www.health.harvard.edu/heart-health/optimism-and-your-health
  39. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08870446.2025.2505909
  40. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403146/full
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2941870/
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12230964/
  43. https://news.syr.edu/2025/03/05/psychology-professor-publishes-study-on-how-optimism-and-pessimism-influence-well-being/
  44. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1429101/full
  45. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100323121757.htm
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27796252/
  47. https://positivepsychology.com/albert-ellis-abc-model-rebt-cbt/
  48. https://www.healthline.com/health/abc-model
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5836900/
  50. https://ggia.berkeley.edu/practice/best_possible_self
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6756746/
  52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20170998/
  53. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED425387.pdf
  54. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11126-025-10145-7
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0090261624000548
  56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101081
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24417602/
  58. https://sparqtools.org/mobility-measure/revised-life-orientation-test-lotr/
  59. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/
  60. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/stoicism/
  61. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aquinas/
  62. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/
  63. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jean-Jacques-Rousseau
  64. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/
  65. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Western-philosophy/The-19th-century
  66. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/camus/
  67. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/19942/19942-h/19942-h.htm
  68. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/voltaire-satirizes-optimism-candide
  69. https://www.thecollector.com/is-this-best-all-possible-worlds-leibniz-voltaire/
  70. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_World_as_Will_and_Representation
  71. https://philarchive.org/archive/WOOSP
  72. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kierkegaard/
  73. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nietzsche-moral-political/
  74. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/process-theism/
  75. https://www.gotquestions.org/free-will-defense.html
  76. https://www.academia.edu/5747947/THEODICY_AND_THE_HOLOCAUST_A_CRITICAL_EXAMINATION
  77. https://secularhumanism.org/2021/10/must-humanism-be-optimistic/
  78. https://news.nd.edu/news/in-new-research-roy-scranton-explores-climate-change-and-the-limits-of-human-progress/
  79. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-022-00550-2
  80. https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/7/29/21340730/cornel-west-coronavirus-racism-way-through-podcast
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6866307/
  82. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2511101122
  83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17960136/
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3424419/
  85. https://www.nature.com/articles/mp200948
  86. https://www.en-journal.org/journal/view.html?uid=188
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X23001721
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11591838/
  89. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20603163/
  90. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.759133/full
  91. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3
  92. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10519-021-10081-9
  93. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1900712116
  94. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-02594-8
  95. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2025/01/optimism-boost-saving
  96. https://www.academia.edu/124333415/Optimism_and_pessimism_were_prospectively_associated_with_adaptation_during_the_COVID_19_pandemic
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.