Hubbry Logo
Goofing offGoofing offMain
Open search
Goofing off
Community hub
Goofing off
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Goofing off
Goofing off
Goofing off
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A man goofing off at work, playing with a fidget spinner and a ball

Goofing off is an American slang term for engaging in recreation or an idle pastime while obligations of work or society are neglected.

The Online Etymology Dictionary traces the word “goof” to derive from French “goffe” meaning “awkward” or “stupid,”. Alternatively it may also stem from Middle English goffen, meaning “to speak in a frivolous manner,” which itself may have come from Old English gegaf (“buffoonery”).[1]

Common obligations neglected in the course of goofing off include schoolwork, paid employment, social courtesies and the expectations of new relations. According to the National Day Calendar, “National Goof Off Day” is observed annually on March 22. [2] Goofing off at school is considered to be a regular behaviour in the Western world, which is engaged in by all students at one time or another.[3]

When goofing off occurs within the classroom, teachers can resolve the matter quickly by direct confrontation.[4] Employers may use wage premiums to discourage goofing off by their employees, although it is suggested that the effects of such incentives cause aging to have a negative effect upon earnings sooner than would be otherwise expected.[5] Goofing off has been shown to improve work or study in the right environments, and can relieve stress.[6][7] It may be a form of creativity and experimentation, providing useful learning experiences and discoveries.[8]

A 2007 study by Wayne H. Decker and Thomas Calo reported that men were more likely than women to describe “goofing off” as playing around at work, often comparing their work to sports. Women, in contrast, were more likely to view it as their responsibility to stay on task and regarded goofing off as unfair to their colleagues.[9] Some research has indicated that women tend to feel more guilt than men about taking time for themselves and so use breaks to become more organized.[10][11]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Goofing off

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Goofing off is an informal expression referring to the act of wasting time, dawdling, or engaging in frivolous or idle activities while avoiding work, responsibilities, or obligations. The term originated in the mid-20th century, with the "goof" first recorded around 1932 to describe spending time idly or foolishly, evolving into the phrasal verb "goof off" in the —particularly in U.S. —to denote shirking duties. Primarily used in casual contexts, it often carries a of lighthearted irresponsibility, distinguishing it from more serious forms of . While traditionally viewed negatively in productivity-focused environments, moderate goofing off has been associated with psychological benefits such as improved , reduced stress, and enhanced through mental recovery, as supported by on work breaks.

Etymology and Definition

Etymology

The term "goof" entered American slang in as a noun denoting a silly or foolish person, likely derived from the English dialectal word "goff," which referred to a or foolish dating back to . This origin reflects a phonetic shift from "goff," possibly influenced by earlier uses in regional dialects to describe buffoonery or ineptitude. The adjective "," meaning silly or daft, followed in , formed by adding the "-y" to "." The verb form "to goof," meaning to blunder or act foolishly, first appeared in , paving the way for idiomatic expressions involving . The phrase "goof off," specifically referring to shirking duties or loafing, emerged in the early as U.S. during , initially describing mistakes during drills and later extending to wasting time. A related variant, "goofing around," denotes playful or unproductive and shares the same semantic evolution from the verb "goof." Synonyms like "lollygagging" trace to mid-19th-century , with the first recorded use in 1862, initially referring to amorous dawdling or kissing and later meaning to dawdle or engage in idle play, possibly combining dialectal "lolly" (tongue) with "gag" (to deceive or fool). In , a phonetic and cultural parallel is "mucking about," attested from 1937, which semantically shifts from "muck" (mess or dirt, from "myki") to imply aimless or disruptive fooling around. These terms illustrate broader semantic developments in English , where words for foolishness or messiness extended to behaviors of avoidance or .

Definition

Goofing off refers to engaging in voluntary, frivolous, or non-productive activities pursued primarily for immediate pleasure, without any external goals or obligations, often as a means to temporarily escape responsibilities. This behavior is characterized by its absorbing and invigorating nature, involving elements of playfulness, self-expression, or make-believe, and it stands apart from structured work or duties by existing in bounded spaces of time and . Unlike deliberate , which is typically anxiety-driven and involves delaying specific tasks due to fear of failure or inadequacy, goofing off emphasizes spontaneous enjoyment and can even nourish creative processes by allowing ideas to percolate unconsciously during . It differs from relaxation, which may be intentional and restorative (such as structured or rest), by lacking any purposeful aim toward self-improvement or recovery, and from , which is a passive state of dissatisfaction, as goofing off actively counters ennui through stimulating, goal-free engagement. Goofing off can manifest in active or passive forms, depending on the level of physical or mental involvement. Active goofing off includes energetic pursuits like pranks, impromptu games, or playful dancing, which demand interaction and movement to generate fun. In contrast, passive goofing off involves lower-effort activities such as daydreaming, aimless scrolling through social media, or simply watching the world go by, where the focus is on unhurried observation or mental wandering without commitment. These types highlight the spectrum of intent, from boisterous escapism to quiet reverie, both serving to disrupt routine without advancing productivity. The perception and acceptability of goofing off vary by context and cultural norms, particularly between children and adults. In children, it often aligns with natural play, fostering development through experimentation and social bonding in peer settings, where behaviors like goofing around are normalized as essential for growth. For adults, it frequently appears as work avoidance, such as puttering around or taking unauthorized breaks, which may be viewed negatively in high-productivity environments but positively when reframed as creative recharge. Culturally, practices like the in Mediterranean or Latin American societies represent accepted forms of midday non-productivity, integrated into daily rhythms for rest and rejuvenation, contrasting with more rigid Western norms that stigmatize unscheduled as inefficiency.

Historical Context

Early Usage

In the , behaviors resembling goofing off appeared in as "idling" or aimless wandering, often portrayed as harmless leisure amid societal expectations of productivity. ' The Pickwick Papers (1836) exemplifies this through the Pickwick Club members' leisurely pursuits, such as Mr. Pickwick's contemplation of nature from Rochester Bridge while awaiting breakfast, described as leaning over the balustrades in idle reflection, or the group's pleasant stroll through shady lanes and woods to attend a match in Muggleton, emphasizing unhurried enjoyment of the June afternoon scenery. These depictions highlight idling as a form of social and exploratory respite, contrasting with the era's industrializing pressures. By the early 20th century, the term "" entered American vernacular around 1916, initially denoting a silly, stupid, or daft person engaged in foolish antics, with roots in performances and the exuberant and culture of the . In glossaries from the period, "" referred to a sap or fellow prone to lighthearted, unserious behavior, often in social settings like dances or speakeasies. This usage laid the groundwork for "goof off," which emerged in the as to describe wasting time or shirking duties, tying directly to the etymological evolution of "" from mere foolishness to active idleness. During (1914–1918), soldiers' accounts in diaries and letters frequently documented downtime activities as vital for morale-boosting amid trench warfare's monotony and stress, with behaviors akin to goofing off including playing cards, yarning (), and lighthearted larking about in rest periods. For instance, soldier diaries describe units engaging in debates, shooting hares, and casual games during lulls, which helped sustain spirits and counteract the war's psychological toll. These informal recreations served as subtle resistance to rigid , preserving mental resilience without formal recognition. In pre-World War II labor contexts, particularly U.S. factories, "goofing off" appeared in union records and industrial studies as a form of subtle worker resistance to the monotony of assembly-line work, encompassing slowing production, extended breaks, and to reclaim . The Hawthorne experiments (1924–1932) at Western Electric's plant, a seminal study in labor dynamics, observed workers spending time talking and idling socially, which researchers noted as informal pushback against supervisory oversight and repetitive tasks, influencing early union strategies for better conditions. Such practices underscored goofing off as a low-risk tactic in the rising labor movement, documented in reports from the era's organizing efforts.

Evolution in the 20th Century

The term "goofing off," originating as 1940s military slang for wasting time or shirking duties, evolved in the mid-20th century amid broader social transformations in American life. In the post-World War II economic boom, goofing off integrated into portrayals of suburban family dynamics, reflecting a normalized view of lighthearted idleness amid prosperity. The television series Leave It to Beaver (1957–1963) frequently depicted such behavior as harmless youthful mischief, as in the episode "The Yard Birds," where brothers Wally and Beaver procrastinate on yard work by playing instead, leading to comedic family resolutions. Similarly, in "Beaver's Graduation," Beaver's poor performance is attributed to excessive goofing off, underscoring parental guidance toward responsibility without severe condemnation. These narratives mirrored the era's emphasis on stable, middle-class routines where occasional leisure was seen as a benign counterbalance to routine obligations. The 1960s counterculture shift, building on influences, recast goofing off as an act of rebellion against conformist work norms and authority. The hippie movement explicitly rejected the , promoting spontaneous living and anti-materialism as forms of liberation from societal pressures. This reframing echoed in Beat writings, such as Jack Kerouac's (1959), where the poem "Goofing at the Table" captures playful, unstructured social interaction as a defiant embrace of the moment over productivity. Though (1957) predated the hippies, its themes of nomadic freedom extended into the decade, influencing youth to view as resistance to values. By the and , amid rising corporate , goofing off became a staple of office , highlighting worker alienation in environments. The comic strip, launched in 1989 by , lampooned this through characters devising ways to evade pointless tasks, such as feigning busyness to avoid meetings or exploiting inefficiencies for personal downtime. Drawing from Adams' own corporate experiences, the series critiqued HR-driven policies that prioritized appearances over meaningful work, embedding "goofing off" as a survival tactic in white-collar drudgery.

Psychological Perspectives

Cognitive and Emotional Benefits

Goofing off, often manifested as unstructured play or , has been shown to enhance by promoting . Research indicates that periods of during simple tasks facilitate creative incubation, allowing individuals to generate more novel solutions to problems. For instance, a study found that participants who engaged in undemanding activities permitting outperformed those in demanding tasks on subsequent exercises, suggesting that disengagement from focused effort boosts associative thinking processes. Such breaks also play a key role in stress reduction and emotional regulation. Short periods of goofing off, such as brief respites from work, help reduce stress, thereby mitigating physiological responses to chronic tension. According to findings from the , incorporating regular breaks into routines enhances overall well-being by replenishing energy and improving mood, with even micro-breaks shown to alleviate and support emotional recovery. From a cognitive perspective, idle time during goofing off activates the brain's (DMN), a set of interconnected regions prominent during rest. Functional MRI studies reveal that DMN engagement during such periods supports , enabling the integration and strengthening of recently acquired information outside of states. This neural mechanism underscores how unstructured downtime contributes to cognitive recharge, facilitating better retention and future learning efficiency. Incorporating balanced routines with goofing off is linked to long-term emotional , particularly in reducing burnout risk. data indicate that employees who prioritize recovery through breaks experience lower rates of exhaustion and higher , with engaged and thriving individuals having a 61% lower likelihood of experiencing burnout often or always compared to engaged but non-thriving individuals. Gallup polls from the highlight that fostering such balance in professional settings correlates with sustained benefits, emphasizing the protective role of periodic disengagement.

Potential Drawbacks

Excessive goofing off can perpetuate a procrastination cycle by reinforcing avoidance behaviors, which in turn generate feelings of guilt and anxiety. According to (CBT) models developed by Aaron T. Beck in the 1970s, such patterns arise when individuals engage in short-term avoidance of tasks to alleviate immediate discomfort, only to experience heightened negative emotions like guilt over unaccomplished responsibilities and anxiety about future consequences. This reinforcement loop is evident in applications of to , where avoidance strengthens maladaptive thought patterns, making it harder to initiate productive actions. Research on CBT interventions highlights how breaking this cycle requires addressing these emotional reinforcements to prevent escalating distress. Habitual distraction from goofing off may contribute to attention deficits by impairing sustained focus and executive function, particularly in individuals prone to attention-related challenges. Studies from the 2010s on ADHD indicate that excessive unstructured downtime exacerbates difficulties in maintaining attention and regulating impulses, leading to a decline in executive functions such as task initiation and completion. For those with ADHD, prolonged periods of low-stimulation idleness can intensify symptoms, as the lack of external structure overwhelms self-regulatory capacities, resulting in poorer performance on attention-demanding tasks. This impairment is supported by performance-based assessments showing that unstructured environments disproportionately hinder focus in ADHD populations compared to neurotypical individuals. The emotional toll of excessive goofing off includes increased isolation when superficial social distractions supplant deeper interpersonal connections, correlating with depressive symptoms in studies on digital loafing. Meta-analyses from the 2020s on cyberloafing behaviors reveal positive associations between non-work digital activities and depressive outcomes, as habitual online loafing often replaces meaningful interactions with passive consumption, fostering feelings of disconnection. Research on use, akin to digital goofing, shows that excessive engagement in such activities heightens isolation and depression risk, particularly among young adults, by promoting superficial social comparisons over authentic relationships. These findings underscore how digital forms of loafing can amplify emotional distress through reduced social fulfillment. In children, overindulgence in idleness can hinder cognitive skill-building by limiting opportunities for active exploration essential to development, as adapted from Jean Piaget's stages of cognitive growth. Piaget's theory emphasizes that sensorimotor and preoperational stages rely on interactive play to construct schemas for understanding the world; excessive passive idleness, akin to ful environments, deprives children of this stimulation, leading to delays in language, problem-solving, and . Studies on early demonstrate that lack of structured engagement impairs and cognitive milestones, mirroring the risks of prolonged idleness by stunting adaptive learning processes. Balancing these drawbacks with the benefits of occasional rest remains key to healthy development.

Sociological and Cultural Aspects

In Workplace Dynamics

Goofing off in the workplace often manifests as informal banter and casual interactions, such as "water cooler" chats, which play a significant role in fostering team cohesion and social bonding among employees. Ethnographic observations highlight how these spontaneous conversations facilitate relationship-building and information sharing beyond formal tasks, contributing to a more collaborative office culture. For instance, studies on informal interactions around shared spaces like photocopiers or water coolers demonstrate that such exchanges enhance mutual understanding and group solidarity, reducing feelings of isolation in professional settings. In hierarchical organizational environments, goofing off can serve as a subtle form of resistance against rigid power structures, particularly in labor-intensive settings like assembly lines. Labor research from the late frames and minor acts of —such as deliberate slowdowns—as employee strategies to reclaim and challenge managerial control. These behaviors, often understated, reflect broader tensions in workplaces where workers negotiate boundaries between compliance and . Generational differences shape perceptions of goofing off, with and Gen Z increasingly viewing it as a means of setting boundaries against the demands of hustle culture, in contrast to ' emphasis on uninterrupted productivity. Surveys indicate that 46% of Gen Z workers prioritize work-life balance when selecting jobs, often through practices like taking intentional breaks to avoid burnout. This shift represents a rejection of constant output expectations, as younger generations seek roles that accommodate personal over relentless performance. The transition to during the 2020 amplified goofing off through "cyberloafing," where employees engaged in non-work browsing and use via digital tools. Research shows a marked increase in such activities post-pandemic, with studies reporting heightened cyberloafing levels due to reduced direct supervision and blurred home-office boundaries. Data from analyses reveal that cyberslacking became more prevalent as a mechanism, often linked to digital platform access during enforced isolation. These patterns underscore how goofing off briefly reduces workplace stress by allowing mental respite amid prolonged virtual demands.

Representations in Media and Literature

In literature, Mark Twain's (1884) portrays idleness on the as a form of liberation and harmony with nature, contrasting the constraints of civilized society and celebrating Huck's carefree drifting as an ideal state of . Similarly, Douglas Coupland's Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture (1991) depicts protagonists engaging in aimless conversations and temporary jobs, embodying a deliberate rejection of careerist ambition in favor of personal storytelling and transient leisure amid economic uncertainty. Film and television often frame goofing off as youthful defiance or everyday workplace escapism. In (1986), the protagonist skips school for a day of parades, car theft, and luxury outings, subverting adult through playful and direct audience appeals that romanticize as essential self-expression. The sitcom (2005–2013) captures mundane office slacking through pranks, immature banter, and distractions like Jim's teasing of Dwight, transforming routine drudgery into humorous camaraderie that highlights the tedium of corporate life. Comic strips and animation elevate laziness to iconic status. Garfield, introduced in 1978 by Jim Davis, personifies indolence as a sarcastic, lasagna-obsessed cat who naps excessively and mocks productivity, resonating as a relatable in an overworked society. Homer Simpson in (1989–present) embodies erratic goofing off through beer-fueled antics and job neglect, critiquing precarious labor by contrasting his unearned privileges with diligent workers' fates in episodes like "." Dystopian critiques warn of idleness's dangers under control. Aldous Huxley's Brave New World (1932) satirizes excessive leisure in a society with short workdays filled by shallow "feelies" and distractions, portraying it as a mechanism for docility that breeds boredom and erodes humanity.

Impacts and Management

Effects on Productivity

Goofing off often results in short-term dips in productivity, as it diverts time from core tasks. Time-tracking studies from the 2010s, such as RescueTime's analysis of over 225 million hours of digital work in 2017, reveal that workers spend approximately 47% of their workday on unproductive activities, including distractions and non-work browsing, equating to about 2.5 hours of effective work in an average 5-hour digital session. These metrics highlight how unplanned goofing off contributes to immediate output losses, with employees frequently failing to achieve even 30 minutes of uninterrupted focus, as reported in RescueTime's 2018 survey of 50,000 knowledge workers. Paradoxically, brief instances of goofing off can yield gains by aligning with natural energy cycles, preventing burnout and enhancing sustained performance. research, popularized in productivity literature since the mid-20th century through Nathaniel Kleitman's basic rest-activity cycle studies and further applied in Tony Schwartz's 2007 framework, demonstrates that humans operate in 90- to 120-minute cycles of high alertness followed by fatigue; short breaks during these troughs restore cognitive resources, leading to higher post-break efficiency without net time loss. Such "" allows for psychological recharges that sharpen focus upon resumption. Measuring the effects of goofing off presents challenges, particularly in differentiating it from intentional restorative breaks using tools like activity logs and self-reported data. Productivity software such as categorizes time via automated tracking but relies on user-defined labels, which can blur lines between unproductive diversion and strategic pauses, complicating accurate assessment. Economic models further underscore the scale, projecting U.S. annual losses from distractions—including excessive goofing off—at approximately $650 billion as of 2025, based on analyses estimating around 29% of work hours (582 hours per year) lost to interruptions. Industry variations influence tolerance for goofing off and its productivity impact. In creative fields like tech startups, flexible informal breaks are more accepted, supporting and yielding gains through non-linear schedules that accommodate energy fluctuations. Conversely, manufacturing sectors enforce stricter, scheduled breaks to minimize disruptions, prioritizing consistent line efficiency over individual recovery rhythms.

Strategies for Balance

One effective strategy for balancing goofing off involves the , which structures work into 25-minute focused intervals followed by 5-minute breaks, allowing controlled moments of rest to recharge without derailing momentum. Developed in the late 1980s by Francesco Cirillo while a university student, this method uses a —originally a tomato-shaped kitchen device, hence the name—to promote sustained attention and intentional short diversions that prevent prolonged idleness. Mindful integration of goofing off can transform unstructured downtime into purposeful recovery through digital tools and practices. For instance, the app, launched in the mid-2010s, employs by letting users "plant" virtual trees during focus periods; if the phone remains unused, the tree grows, rewarding concentration and curbing excessive distractions with visual progress tracking. Complementing this, practices encourage reframing goofing off as intentional rest, fostering greater awareness and acceptance of emotional needs to support adaptive breaks rather than aimless . At an organizational level, flexible work policies provide a framework for balancing rest and output. Trials of four-day workweeks in the , such as the 2022 pilot involving 61 companies, have demonstrated reductions in burnout— with 71% of participants reporting lower levels—while maintaining or improving , as measured by revenue stability and task completion rates. More recent trials in 2024-2025, including large-scale studies, have confirmed these benefits, with reduced burnout and maintained or improved across various sectors. These initiatives, often without pay cuts, underscore how scheduled downtime can enhance overall performance without compromising results. Individuals can cultivate balance through self-regulation techniques like journaling to pinpoint patterns in goofing off, enabling targeted adjustments for better focus. By logging daily activities and distractions, users identify triggers for unproductive idleness, such as mid-afternoon lulls, and track improvements over time. Integrating principles, such as outlined by and in their 2008 book Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, supports habit formation by subtly altering environments—like placing timers visibly—to encourage productive routines without relying on willpower alone.

References

  1. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/goof-off
  2. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/goof-off
  3. https://www.etymonline.com/word/goof
  4. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/goof-off
  5. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/goof-off
  6. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/think-well/201701/why-goofing-off-is-good-to-do
  7. https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2012/06/18/eight-ways-goofing-off-can-make-you-more-productive/
  8. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/goofy
  9. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/goof
  10. https://www.etymonline.com/word/lollygag
  11. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/199507/goofing-off
  12. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hollywood-the-couch/201206/in-praise-goofing
  13. https://www.mindful.org/goof-off-now-really/
  14. https://www.youdance.com/youdance-blog/passive-vs-active-play-understanding-the-difference
  15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9613425/
  16. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/580/580-h/580-h.htm
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360296358_Pickwick_in_the_Papers_Charles_Dickens_and_the_Politics_of_Remediation_in_the_Newspaper_Press_1836-1870
  18. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/76195/16-words-you-might-be-surprised-are-100-years-old
  19. https://wordhistories.net/2017/03/19/the-cats-whiskers/
  20. https://media.api.aucklandmuseum.com/id/media/public/4adf4d8e-05a3-4d62-8b5c-fc28da197058/original.pdf
  21. https://www.nam.ac.uk/manchester-sergeants-diary-reveals-bitter-struggle-somme-warfare
  22. https://libcom.org/book/export/html/39978
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ronald-Friend/publication/232486655_Hawthorne_the_Myth_of_the_Docile_Worker_and_Class_Bias_in_Psychology/links/6194256661f0987720a5d40d/Hawthorne-the-Myth-of-the-Docile-Worker-and-Class-Bias-in-Psychology.pdf
  24. https://daily.wordreference.com/2024/02/28/intermediate-word-of-the-day-goof/
  25. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0630319/plotsummary/
  26. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0630209/plotsummary/
  27. https://www.thecollector.com/hippie-counterculture-movement-1960s-1970s/
  28. https://andymerrifield.org/2020/03/29/goofing-at-the-table/
  29. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-jack-kerouac/impact-of-on-the-road-on-the-1960s-counterculture/1D612B0E9CED53831AD022A62781D530
  30. https://screenrant.com/funniest-dilbert-comics-scott-adams/
  31. https://www.focusresourcesinc.com/lessons-from-scott-adams-dilbert-cartoons-for-corporate-life/
  32. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797612446024
  33. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2019/01/break
  34. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/14/4/349
  35. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073858411403316
  36. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/313160/preventing-and-dealing-with-employee-burnout.aspx
  37. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/215924/well-being.aspx
  38. https://learn.beckinstitute.org/cms/delivery/media/MCPNPP5FFGJVDJ7C74SMXCMM5CWY
  39. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506073.2025.2543893
  40. https://www.guilford.com/excerpts/beck_ch1.pdf
  41. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/here-there-and-everywhere/202406/coping-with-summer-unstructured-time-when-you-have-adhd
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330856290_A_novel_unstructured_performance-based_task_of_executive_function_in_children_with_attention-deficithyperactivity_disorder
  43. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00593/full
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9362957/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4853817/
  46. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.905699/pdf
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3652241/
  48. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537095/
  49. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25590341/
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240279735_Photocopiers_and_Water-coolers_The_Affordances_of_Informal_Interaction
  51. https://dokumen.pub/empty-labor-idleness-and-workplace-resistance-illustrated-1107066417-9781107066410.html
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279460218_Empty_Labor_Idleness_and_Workplace_Resistance_R_Paulsen_Cambridge_University_Press_Cambridge_2014_217_pp
  53. https://www.seattletimes.com/life/food-drink/hustle-culture-is-history-well-being-is-the-new-workplace-trend-to-watch/
  54. https://www.forbes.com/sites/colleenbatchelder/2025/06/29/is-hustle-culture-dead-3-things-gen-z-wants-instead/
  55. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/isre.2020.0216
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372619392_Remote_working_and_work_performance_during_the_COVID-19_pandemic_the_role_of_remote_work_satisfaction_digital_literacy_and_cyberslacking
  57. https://ca.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/taking-a-break-from-work
  58. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/c821gk26b
  59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26556295
  60. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc279235/m2/1/high_res_d/1002726730-hubbard.pdf
  61. https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/20707420/the-office-netflix-nbc-workplace-fantasy
  62. https://www.life.com/arts-entertainment/garfield-the-story-behind-the-coolest-cat/
  63. https://www.academia.edu/33614671/Frank_Grimes_Enemy_Precarious_Labour_and_Realism_in_The_Simpsons
  64. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=ksuhonors1335827209&disposition=attachment
  65. https://medium.com/swlh/what-we-learned-about-productivity-from-analyzing-225-million-hours-of-working-time-in-2017-7c2a1062d41d
  66. https://www.hrdive.com/news/employees-say-they-cant-get-30-minutes-of-uninterrupted-work-time/527815/
  67. https://hbr.org/2007/10/manage-your-energy-not-your-time
  68. https://www.rescuetime.com/
  69. https://clockify.me/blog/productivity/workplace-distractions/
  70. https://blog.dropbox.com/topics/work-culture/economist-impact-cost-of-lost-focus-research-study-2023
  71. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20220928-the-non-linear-workdays-changing-the-shape-of-productivity
  72. https://www.pomodorotechnique.com/
  73. https://www.northbaycounselling.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Cirillo-Pomodoro-Technique.pdf
  74. https://www.forestapp.cc/
  75. https://goodux.appcues.com/blog/forests-gamified-focus
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647439/
  77. https://autonomy.work/portfolio/uk4dwpilotresults/
  78. https://www.ukri.org/who-we-are/how-we-are-doing/research-outcomes-and-impact/esrc/a-four-day-working-week-improves-mental-and-physical-health/
  79. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/biggest-trial-of-four-day-workweek-finds-workers-are-happier-and-feel-just/
  80. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2025/01/rise-of-4-day-workweek
  81. https://positivepsychology.com/journaling-prompts/
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31865763_Nudge_Improving_Decisions_about_Health_Wealth_and_Happiness_RH_Thaler_CR_Sunstein
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.