Hubbry Logo
MindfulnessMindfulnessMain
Open search
Mindfulness
Community hub
Mindfulness
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Mindfulness
Mindfulness
from Wikipedia

Mindfulness is the cognitive skill,[1][2][3] usually developed through exercises, of sustaining metacognitive awareness towards the contents of one's own mind and bodily sensations in the present moment.[4][5][a][6][7][8] The term mindfulness derives from the Pali word sati, a significant element of Buddhist traditions,[9][10] and the practice is based on ānāpānasati, Chan, and Tibetan meditation techniques.[11][12][b]

Since the 1990s, secular mindfulness has gained popularity in the West.[13] Individuals who have contributed to the popularity of secular mindfulness in the modern Western context include Jon Kabat-Zinn and Thích Nhất Hạnh.[14][15]

Clinical psychology and psychiatry since the 1970s have developed a number of therapeutic applications based on mindfulness for helping people experiencing a variety of psychological conditions.[15] [c] Clinical studies have documented both physical- and mental-health benefits of mindfulness in different patient categories as well as in healthy adults and children.[29][30][31][32] [d] [e]

Critics have questioned both the commercialization and the over-marketing of mindfulness for health benefits—as well as emphasizing the need for more randomized controlled studies, for more methodological details in reported studies and for the use of larger sample sizes.[8][page needed][need quotation to verify][34][web 1]

Definitions

[edit]

Mindfulness is the cognitive skill,[1][2][3] usually developed through meditation or sustained practice, of sustaining metacognitive awareness towards the contents of one's own mind and bodily sensations in the present moment.[4][5][a][6][7][8] In particular, it is a type of metacognitive skill[61][62] involving cognitive processes such as attentional monitoring, attentional regulation, attentional focus reorientation,[63] and subpersonal thought inhibition.[64] Mindful awareness can be oriented towards to both internal phenomena, such as thoughts and emotions, and external phenomena, such as speech or other volitional motor actions.[65]

Psychology

[edit]

A.M. Hayes and G. Feldman have highlighted that mindfulness can be seen as a strategy that stands in contrast to a strategy of avoidance of emotion on the one hand and to the strategy of emotional over-engagement on the other hand.[66] Mindfulness can also be viewed as a means to develop self-knowledge and wisdom.[9]

Trait, state and practice

[edit]

According to Brown, Ryan, and Creswell, definitions of mindfulness are typically selectively interpreted based on who is studying it and how it is applied. Some have viewed mindfulness as a mental state, while others have viewed it as a set of skills and techniques.[67] A distinction can also be made between the state of mindfulness and the trait of mindfulness.[68]

According to David S. Black, whereas "mindfulness" originally was associated with esoteric beliefs and religion, and "a capacity attainable only by certain people",[69] scientific researchers have translated the term into measurable terms, providing a valid operational definition of mindfulness.[70][note 1] Black mentions three possible domains:[70]

  1. A trait, a dispositional characteristic (a relatively long lasting trait),[70] a person's tendency to more frequently enter into and more easily abide in mindful states;[71]
  2. A state, an outcome (a state of awareness resulting from mindfulness training),[70] being in a state of present-moment awareness;[71]
  3. A practice (mindfulness meditation practice itself).[note 2]

Trait-like constructs

[edit]

According to Brown, mindfulness is:

A quality of consciousness manifest in, but not isomorphic with, the activities through which it is enhanced."[67]

Several mindfulness measures have been developed which are based on self-reporting of trait-like constructs:[76]

  • Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
  • Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI)
  • Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS)
  • Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)
  • Mindfulness Questionnaire (MQ)
  • Revised Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS-R)
  • Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS)

State-like phenomenon

[edit]

According to Bishop, et alia, mindfulness is, "A kind of nonelaborative, nonjudgmental, present-centered awareness in which each thought, feeling, or sensation that arises in the attentional field is acknowledged and accepted as it is."[77]

  • The Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS) measures mindfulness as a state-like phenomenon, that is evoked and maintained by regular practice.[76]
  • The State Mindfulness Scale (SMS) is a 21-item survey with an overall state mindfulness scale, and 2 sub-scales (state mindfulness of mind, and state mindfulness of body).[78]

Mindfulness-practice

[edit]

Mindfulness as a practice is described as:

  • "a way of paying attention that originated in Eastern meditation practices"[79]
  • "Paying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally"[5][a]
  • "Bringing one's complete attention to the present experience on a moment-to-moment basis"[5]

According to Steven F. Hick, mindfulness practice involves both formal and informal meditation practices, and nonmeditation-based exercises.[80] Formal mindfulness, or meditation, is the practice of sustaining attention on body, breath or sensations, or whatever arises in each moment.[80] Informal mindfulness is the application of mindful attention in everyday life.[80] Nonmeditation-based exercises are specifically used in dialectical behavior therapy and in acceptance and commitment therapy.[80]

Buddhism

[edit]

Secular mindfulness is derived from Buddhist meditation techniques, and translates the terms sati and smriti.[9][81][67]

Sati and smṛti

[edit]

The Buddhist term translated into English as "mindfulness" originates in the Pali term sati and in its Sanskrit counterpart smṛti. It is often translated as "bare attention", but in the Buddhist tradition it has a broader meaning and application, and the meaning of these terms has been the topic of extensive debate and discussion.[82]

According to Bryan Levman, "the word sati incorporates the meaning of 'memory' and 'remembrance' in much of its usage in both the suttas and the [traditional Buddhist] commentary, and ... without the memory component, the notion of mindfulness cannot be properly understood or applied, as mindfulness requires memory for its effectiveness".[83]

According to Robert Sharf, smṛti originally meant "to remember", "to recollect", "to bear in mind", as in the Vedic tradition of remembering the sacred texts. The term sati also means "to remember". In the Satipaṭṭhāna-sutta the term sati means to remember the dharmas, whereby the true nature of phenomena can be seen.[82] Sharf refers to the Milindapañha, which said that the arising of sati calls to mind the wholesome dhammas such as the four foundations of mindfulness, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven awakening-factors, the noble eightfold path, and the attainment of insight.[84] According to Rupert Gethin,

[sati] should be understood as what allows awareness of the full range and extent of dhammas; sati is an awareness of things in relation to things, and hence an awareness of their relative value. Applied to the satipaṭṭhānas, presumably what this means is that sati is what causes the practitioner of yoga to "remember" that any feeling he may experience exists in relation to a whole variety or world of feelings that may be skillful or unskillful, with faults or faultless, relatively inferior or refined, dark or pure."[85][note 3]

Sharf further notes that this has little to do with "bare attention", the popular contemporary interpretation of sati, "since it entails, among other things, the proper discrimination of the moral valence of phenomena as they arise."[85]

Georges Dreyfus has also expressed unease with the definition of mindfulness as "bare attention" or "nonelaborative, nonjudgmental, present-centered awareness", stressing that mindfulness in a Buddhist context also means "remembering", which indicates that the function of mindfulness also includes the retention of information.[86][note 4] Robert H. Sharf notes that Buddhist practice is aimed at the attainment of "correct view", not just "bare attention".[web 2][note 5] Jay L. Garfield, quoting Shantideva and other sources, stresses that mindfulness is constituted by the union of two functions, calling to mind and vigilantly retaining in mind. He demonstrates that there is a direct connection between the practice of mindfulness and the cultivation of morality—at least in the context of Buddhism, from which modern interpretations of mindfulness are stemming.[87]

Translation

[edit]

The Pali-language scholar Thomas William Rhys Davids (1843–1922) first translated sati in 1881 as English mindfulness in sammā-sati "Right Mindfulness; the active, watchful mind".[88] Noting that Daniel John Gogerly (1845) initially rendered sammā-sati as "correct meditation",[89] Davids said:

sati is literally 'memory' but is used with reference to the constantly repeated phrase 'mindful and thoughtful' (sato sampajâno); and means that activity of mind and constant presence of mind which is one of the duties most frequently inculcated on the good Buddhist."[90]

Alternative translations

[edit]

John D. Dunne says that the translation of sati and smṛti as mindfulness is confusing. A number of Buddhist scholars have started trying to establish "retention" as the preferred alternative.[91] Bhikkhu Bodhi also describes the meaning of sati as "memory".[web 3][note 6] The terms sati/smṛti have been translated as:

Memory

[edit]

The Pali word sati, which is commonly translated as mindfulness, also carries the connotation of memory. It is described in the early Buddhist texts not only as awareness of sense perceptions but also as recollection of the Buddha's teachings[93] and past events:

Sati is required not only to fully take in the moment to be remembered, but also to bring this moment back to mind at a later time. [...] This twofold character of sati can also be found in some verses in the Sutta Nipāta, which instruct the listener to set out with sati, subsequent to an instruction given by the Buddha. In these instances sati seems to combine both present moment awareness and remembering what the Buddha had taught.[94]

According to American Buddhist monk Ven Bhante Vimalaramsi's book A Guide to Tranquil Wisdom Insight Meditation, the term mindfulness is often interpreted differently than what was originally formulated by the Buddha. In the context of Buddhism, he offers the following definition:

Mindfulness means to remember to observe how mind's attention moves from one thing to another. The first part of Mindfulness is to remember to watch the mind and remember to return to your object of meditation when you have wandered off. The second part of Mindfulness is to observe how mind's attention moves from one thing to another.[95]

In Thich Nhat Hanh's lineage, mindfulness is closely intertwined with the concept of interbeing, the notion that all things are interconnected. This school of thought emphasizes awareness of the present moment and ethical living, reflecting the interconnected nature of existence.[96][97]

Definitions arising in modern teaching of meditation

[edit]

Since the 1970s, most books on meditation use definitions of mindfulness similar to Jon Kabat-Zinn's definition as "present moment awareness". However, recently a number of teachers of meditation have proposed quite different definitions of mindfulness. Shinzen Young says a person is mindful when they have mindful awareness, and defines that to be when "concentration power, sensory clarity, and equanimity [are] working together."[web 4] John Yates (Culadasa) defines mindfulness to be "the optimal interaction between attention and peripheral awareness", where he distinguishes attention and peripheral awareness as two distinct modes in which one may be conscious of things.[98]

Other uses

[edit]

The English term mindfulness already existed before it came to be used in a (western) Buddhist context. It was first recorded as myndfulness in 1530 (John Palsgrave translates French pensée), as mindfulnesse in 1561, and mindfulness in 1817. Morphologically earlier terms include mindful (first recorded in 1340), mindfully (1382), and the obsolete mindiness (c. 1200).[99]

According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, mindfulness may also refer to "a state of being aware".[web 5] Synonyms for this "state of being aware" are wakefulness,[100][101] attention,[web 6] alertness,[web 7] prudence,[web 7] conscientiousness,[web 7] awareness,[web 5] consciousness,[web 5] and observation.[web 5]

Historical development

[edit]

Buddhism

[edit]

Mindfulness as a modern, Western practice is founded on Zen and modern Vipassanā,[11][12][note 7] and involves the training of sati, which means "moment to moment awareness of present events", but also "remembering to be aware of something".[104]

Early Buddhism

[edit]

Sati is one of the seven factors of enlightenment. "Correct" or "right" mindfulness (Pali: sammā-sati, Sanskrit samyak-smṛti) is the seventh element of the Noble Eightfold Path. Mindfulness is an antidote to delusion and is considered as a 'power' (Pali: bala) which contributes to the attainment of Nibbana. This faculty becomes a power in particular when it is coupled with clear comprehension of whatever is taking place. Nirvana is a state of being in which greed, hatred and delusion (Pali: moha) have been overcome and abandoned, and are absent from the mind.

According to Paul Williams, referring to Erich Frauwallner, mindfulness provided the way in Early Buddhism to liberation, "constantly watching sensory experience in order to prevent the arising of cravings which would power future experience into rebirths."[105][note 8] According to Vetter, Jhanas may have been the original core practice of the Buddha, which aided the maintenance of mindfulness.[106]

According to Thomas William Rhys Davids, the doctrine of mindfulness is "perhaps the most important" after the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path. T.W. Rhys Davids viewed the teachings of Gotama Buddha as a rational technique for self-actualization and rejected a few parts of it, mainly the doctrine of rebirth, as residual superstitions.[107]

Zazen

[edit]

The aim of zazen is just sitting, that is, suspending all judgmental thinking and letting words, ideas, images and thoughts pass by without getting involved in them.[108][109]

Contemporary Vipassana-meditation

[edit]

In modern vipassana-meditation, as propagated by the Vipassana movement, sati aids vipassana, insight into the true nature of reality, namely the three marks of existence, the impermanence of and the suffering of every conditioned thing that exists, and non-self.[9][110] With this insight, the practitioner becomes a so-called Sotāpanna, a "stream-enterer", the first stage on the path to liberation.[111][web 8][note 9]

Vipassana is practiced in tandem with Samatha, and also plays a central role in other Buddhist traditions.[110][112] According to the contemporary Theravada orthodoxy, Samatha is used as a preparation for Vipassanā, pacifying the mind and strengthening the concentration in order to allow the work of insight, which leads to liberation.

Vipassanā-meditation has gained popularity in the west through the modern Buddhist vipassana movement, modeled after Theravāda Buddhism meditation practices,[102] which employs vipassanā and ānāpāna meditation as its primary techniques and places emphasis on the teachings of the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta.

Anapanasati, satipaṭṭhāna, and vipassana

[edit]

Anapanasati is mindfulness of breathing. "Sati" means mindfulness; "ānāpāna" refers to inhalation and exhalation. Anapanasati means to feel the sensations caused by the movements of the breath in the body. The Anapanasati Sutta gives an exposition on this practice.[note 10]

Satipaṭṭhāna is the establishment of mindfulness in one's day-to-day life, maintaining as much as possible a calm awareness of one's body, feelings, mind, and dhammas. The practice of mindfulness supports analysis resulting in the arising of wisdom (Pali: paññā, Sanskrit: prajñā).[110]

Samprajaña, apramāda and atappa

[edit]

In contemporary Theravada practice, "mindfulness" also includes samprajaña, meaning "clear comprehension" and apramāda meaning "vigilance".[web 10][note 11] All three terms are sometimes (confusingly) translated as "mindfulness", but they all have specific shades of meaning.

In a publicly available correspondence between Bhikkhu Bodhi and B. Alan Wallace, Bodhi has described Ven. Nyanaponika Thera's views on "right mindfulness" and sampajañña as follows:

He held that in the proper practice of right mindfulness, sati has to be integrated with sampajañña, clear comprehension, and it is only when these two work together that right mindfulness can fulfill its intended purpose.[113][note 12]

Monitoring mental processes

[edit]

According to Buddhadasa, the aim of mindfulness is to stop the arising of disturbing thoughts and emotions, which arise from sense-contact.[114]

According to Grzegorz Polak, the four upassanā (foundations of mindfulness) have been misunderstood by the developing Buddhist tradition, including Theravada, to refer to four different foundations. According to Polak, the four upassanā do not refer to four different foundations, but to the awareness of four different aspects of raising mindfulness:[115]

  • the six sense-bases which one needs to be aware of (kāyānupassanā);
  • contemplation on vedanās, which arise with the contact between the senses and their objects (vedanānupassanā);
  • the altered states of mind to which this practice leads (cittānupassanā);
  • the development from the five hindrances to the seven factors of enlightenment (dhammānupassanā).

Stoicism

[edit]

The Greek philosophical school of Stoicism founded by Zeno of Citium included practices resembling those of mindfulness, such as visualization exercises. In his Discourses, Stoic philosopher Epictetus addresses in particular the concept of attention (prosoche), an idea also found in Seneca and Marcus Aurelius.[116] By cultivating it over time, this skill would prevent the practitioner from becoming unattentive and moved by instinct rather than according to reason.[117]

Christianity

[edit]

Mindfulness traditions are also found in some Christian spiritual traditions. In his Rules for Eating, St. Ignatius of Loyola teaches, "let him guard against all his soul being intent on what he is eating, and in eating let him not go hurriedly, through appetite, but be master of himself, as well in the manner of eating as in the quantity which he eats."[118] He might have been inspired by Epictetus' Enchiridion.[116]

In addition, Jesus himself, in his Sermon on the Mount, said, "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -- Matthew 6:34, NIV,[119]

Transcendentalism

[edit]

Mindfulness practitioner Jon Kabat-Zinn refers to Thoreau as a predecessor of the interest in mindfulness, together with other eminent Transcendentalists such as Emerson and Whitman:[web 11]

The collective experience[note 13] of sages, yogis, and Zen masters offers a view of the world which is complementary to the predominantly reductionist and materialistic one currently dominating Western thought and institutions. But this view is neither particularly "Eastern" nor mystical. Thoreau saw the same problem with our ordinary mind state in New England in 1846 and wrote with great passion about its unfortunate consequences.[web 11]

The forms of Asian religion and spirituality which were introduced in the west were themselves influenced by Transcendentalism and other 19th-century manifestations of Western esotericism. Transcendentalism was closely connected to the Unitarian Church,[120][web 12] which in India collaborated with Ram Mohan Roy (1772–1833) and his Brahmo Samaj.[120] He found that Unitarianism came closest to true Christianity,[120] and had a strong sympathy for the Unitarians.[121] This influence worked through on Vivekananda, whose modern but idiosyncratic interpretation of Hinduism became widely popular in the west.[122] Vipassana meditation, presented as a centuries-old meditation system, was a 19th-century reinvention,[123] which gained popularity in south-east due to the accessibility of the Buddhist sutras through English translations from the Pali Text Society.[102] It was brought to western attention in the 19th century by the Theosophical Society.[102][124] Zen Buddhism first gained popularity in the west through the writings of D.T. Suzuki, who attempted to present a modern interpretation of Zen, adjusted to western tastes.[102][102]

Jon Kabat-Zinn and MBSR

[edit]

In 1979, Jon Kabat-Zinn founded the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program at the University of Massachusetts to treat the chronically ill.[web 13] This program sparked the application of mindfulness ideas and practices in Medicine[125] for the treatment of a variety of conditions in both healthy and unhealthy people. MBSR and similar programs are now widely applied in schools, prisons, hospitals, veterans centers, and other environments.

Mindfulness practices were inspired mainly by teachings from the Eastern World, particularly from Buddhist traditions. Kabat-Zinn was first introduced to meditation by Philip Kapleau, a Zen missionary who came to speak at MIT where Kabat-Zinn was a student. Kabat-Zinn went on to study meditation with other Zen-Buddhist teachers such as Thích Nhất Hạnh and Seungsahn.[12] He also studied at the Insight Meditation Society and eventually taught there.[12] One of MBSR's techniques—the "body scan"—was derived from a meditation practice ("sweeping") of the Burmese U Ba Khin tradition, as taught by S. N. Goenka in his Vipassana retreats, which he began in 1976. The body scan method has since been widely adapted to secular settings, independent of religious or cultural contexts.[note 14][note 15]

Kabat-Zinn was also influenced by the book The Varieties of Religious Experience by William James[126] which suggests that religions point toward the same experience, and which 1960s counterculture figures interpreted as meaning that the same universal, experiential truth could be reached in different ways, including via non-religious activities.[web 14]

Popularization, "mindfulness movement"

[edit]

Mindfulness is gaining a growing popularity as a practice in daily life, apart from Buddhist insight meditation and its application in clinical psychology.[127] In this context mindfulness is defined as moment-by-moment awareness of thoughts, feelings, bodily sensations, and surrounding environment, characterized mainly by "acceptance"—attention to thoughts and feelings without judging whether they are right or wrong. Mindfulness focuses the human brain on what is being sensed at each moment, instead of on its normal rumination on the past or the future.[web 15] Mindfulness may be seen as a mode of being,[web 16] and can be practiced outside a formal setting.[web 17] The terminology used by scholars of religion, scientists, journalists, and popular media writers to describe this movement of mindfulness "popularization," and the many new contexts of mindfulness practice which have cropped up, has regularly evolved over the past 20 years, with some[which?] criticisms arising.[128] It has also recently been a common trend to see among sport teams, with mindfulness practices being integrated as parts of teams routines.[web 18]

The latest changes when people moved from real-life meditation sessions to the applications on their smart devices has been even more accelerated by the global pandemic. Modern applications are adapting to the needs of their users by using AI technology, involving professional psychologists and offering many different mindfulness approaches to serve a wider audience, such as among athletes.[129]

Practice

[edit]

Mindfulness practice involves the process of developing the skill of bringing one's attention to whatever is happening in the present moment.[7][9][130]

Watching the breath, body-scan and other techniques

[edit]

There are several exercises designed to develop mindfulness meditation, which may be aided by guided meditations "to get the hang of it".[11][131][note 16] As forms of self-observation and interoception, these methods increase awareness of the body, so they are usually beneficial to people with low self-awareness or low awareness of their bodies or emotional state. However, it may provoke anxiety, panic attacks, depression, and dissociation,[132][full citation needed] in people who are very focused on themselves, their bodies, and their emotions.[133]

  • One method is to sit in a straight-backed chair or sit cross-legged on the floor, or a cushion, close one's eyes and bring attention to either the sensations of breathing in the proximity of one's nostrils or to the movements of the abdomen when breathing in and out.[5][web 19][134][page needed] In this meditation practice, one does not try to control one's breathing, but attempts to simply be aware of one's natural breathing process/rhythm.[7] When engaged in this practice, the mind will often run off to other thoughts and associations, if this happens, one passively notices that the mind has wandered, and in an accepting, but non-judgmental way, returns to focusing on breathing.
  • In body-scan meditation the attention is directed at various areas of the body and noting body sensations that happen in the present moment.[5][7][web 20][web 21][web 22]
  • One could also focus on sounds, sensations, thoughts, feelings and actions that happen in the present.[7][130] In this regard, a famous exercise, introduced by Kabat-Zinn in his MBSR program,[web 23] is the mindful tasting of a raisin,[135] in which a raisin is being tasted and eaten mindfully.[136][note 17] By enabling reconnection with internal hunger and satiety cues, mindful eating has been suggested to be a means of maintaining healthy and conscious eating patterns.[137]
  • Other approaches include practicing yoga asanas while attending to movements and body sensations, and walking meditation.[5][7]

Timings

[edit]

Meditators are recommended to start with short periods of 10 minutes or so of meditation practice per day. As one practices regularly, it becomes easier to keep the attention focused on breathing.[7][127] An old Zen saying suggests, "You should sit in meditation for 20 minutes every day — unless you're too busy. Then you should sit for an hour."

In Buddhist context; moral precepts

[edit]

In a Buddhist context the keeping of moral precepts is an essential preparatory stage for mindfulness or meditation.[138][139] Vipassana also includes contemplation and reflection on phenomena as dukkha, anatta and anicca, and reflections on causation and other Buddhist teachings.[140][141]

Models and frameworks for mindfulness practices

[edit]

Two-component model

[edit]

A two-component model of mindfulness based upon a consensus among clinical psychologists has been proposed as an operational and testable definition,[77] :

The first component involves the self-regulation of attention so that it is maintained on immediate experience, thereby allowing for increased recognition of mental events in the present moment. The second component involves adopting a particular orientation toward one's experiences in the present moment, an orientation that is characterized by curiosity, openness, and acceptance.[142]

In this two-component model, self-regulated attention (the first component) "involves bringing awareness to current experience—observing and attending to the changing fields of "objects" (thoughts, feelings, sensations), from moment to moment – by regulating the focus of attention". Orientation to experience (the second component) involves maintaining an attitude of curiosity about objects experienced at each moment, and about where and how the mind wanders when it drifts from the selected focus of attention. Clients are asked to avoid trying to produce a particular state (e.g. relaxation), but rather to just notice each object that arises in the stream of consciousness.[143]

The five-aggregate model

[edit]

An ancient model of the mind, generally known as the five-aggregate model[81] enables one to understand the moment-to-moment manifestation of subjective conscious experience, and therefore can be a potentially useful theoretical resource to guide mindfulness interventions. This model is based upon the traditional buddhist description of the Skandhas.

The five aggregates are described as follows:

  1. Material form: includes both the physical body and external matter where material elements are continuously moving to and from the material body.
  2. Feelings: can be pleasant, unpleasant or neutral.
  3. Perceptions: represent being aware of attributes of an object (e.g. color, shape, etc.)
  4. Volition: represents bodily, verbal, or psychological behavior.
  5. Sensory consciousness: refers to input from the five senses (seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting or touch sensations) or a thought that happens to arise in the mind.

This model describes how sensory consciousness results in the generation of feelings, perception or volition, and how individuals' previously conditioned attitudes and past associations influence this generation. The five aggregates are described as constantly arising and ceasing in the present moment.[81]

Cultivating self-knowledge and wisdom

[edit]

The practice of mindfulness can be utilized to gradually develop self-knowledge and wisdom.[9] In this regard, Buddhist teachings provide detailed instructions on how one can carry out an inquiry into the nature of the mind, and this guidance can help one to make sense of one's subjective experience. This could include understanding what the "present moment" is, how various thoughts, etc., arise following input from the senses, the conditioned nature of thoughts, and other realizations.[9] In Buddhist teachings, ultimate wisdom refers to gaining deep insight into all phenomena or "seeing things as they are."[9][111]

Applications

[edit]

According to Jon Kabat-Zinn the practice of mindfulness may be beneficial to many people in Western society who might be unwilling to adopt Buddhist traditions or vocabulary.[144] Western researchers and clinicians who have introduced mindfulness practice into mental health treatment programs usually teach these skills independently of the religious and cultural traditions of their origins.[5] Programs based on MBSR and similar models have been widely adopted in schools, prisons, hospitals, veterans centers, and other environments.[145]

Therapy programs

[edit]

Mindfulness-based stress reduction

[edit]

Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) is a mindfulness-based program[web 24] developed by Jon Kabat-Zinn at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, which uses a combination of mindfulness meditation, body awareness, and yoga to help people become more mindful.[7] While MBSR has its roots in spiritual teachings, the program itself is secular.[7]

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy

[edit]

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a psychological therapy designed to aid in preventing the relapse of depression, specifically in individuals with Major depressive disorder (MDD).[146] It uses traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) methods and adds in newer psychological strategies such as mindfulness and mindfulness meditation. Cognitive methods can include educating the participant about depression.[147] Mindfulness and mindfulness meditation focus on becoming aware of all incoming thoughts and feelings and accepting them, but not attaching or reacting to them.[148]

Like CBT, MBCT functions on the theory that when individuals who have historically had depression become distressed, they return to automatic cognitive processes that can trigger a depressive episode.[149] The goal of MBCT is to interrupt these automatic processes and teach the participants to focus less on reacting to incoming stimuli, and instead accepting and observing them without judgment.[149] This mindfulness practice allows the participant to notice when automatic processes are occurring and to alter their reaction to be more of a reflection. Research supports the effects of MBCT in people who have been depressed three or more times and demonstrates reduced relapse rates by 50%.[150]

Mindfulness-based pain management

[edit]

Mindfulness-based pain management (MBPM) is a mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) providing specific applications for people living with chronic pain and illness.[web 25][151] Adapting the core concepts and practices of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), MBPM includes a distinctive emphasis on the practice of 'loving-kindness', and has been seen as sensitive to concerns about removing mindfulness teaching from its original ethical framework.[151][152] It was developed by Vidyamala Burch and is delivered through the programs of Breathworks.[web 25][151] It has been subject to a range of clinical studies demonstrating its effectiveness.[151][153][154][155][156][157][158][159]

Acceptance and commitment therapy

[edit]

Acceptance and commitment therapy or (ACT) (typically pronounced as the word "act") is a form of clinical behavior analysis (CBA)[160] used in psychotherapy. It is a psychological intervention that uses acceptance and mindfulness strategies mixed in different ways[161] with commitment and behavior-change strategies, to increase psychological flexibility. The approach was originally called comprehensive distancing.[162] It was developed in the late 1980s[163] by Steven C. Hayes, Kelly G. Wilson, and Kirk Strosahl.[164]

Dialectical behavior therapy

[edit]

Mindfulness is a "core" exercise used in dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), a psychosocial treatment Marsha M. Linehan developed for treating people with borderline personality disorder. DBT is dialectic, says Linehan,[165] in the sense of "the reconciliation of opposites in a continual process of synthesis." As a practitioner of Buddhist meditation techniques, Linehan says:

This emphasis in DBT on a balance of acceptance and change owes much to my experiences in studying meditation and Eastern spirituality. The DBT tenets of observing, mindfulness, and avoidance of judgment are all derived from the study and practice of Zen meditations.[166]

Mode deactivation therapy

[edit]

Mode deactivation therapy (MDT) is a treatment methodology that is derived from the principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy and incorporates elements of Acceptance and commitment therapy, Dialectical behavior therapy, and mindfulness techniques.[167] Mindfulness techniques such as simple breathing exercises are applied to assist the client in awareness and non-judgmental acceptance of unpleasant and distressing thoughts and feelings as they occur in the present moment. Mode Deactivation Therapy was developed and is established as an effective treatment for adolescents with problem behaviors and complex trauma-related psychological problems, according to recent publications by Jack A. Apsche and Joan Swart.[168]

Other programs

[edit]
Morita therapy

The Japanese psychiatrist Shoma Morita, who trained in Zen meditation, developed Morita therapy upon principles of mindfulness and non-attachment.[169]

IFS

Internal Family Systems Model (IFS), developed by Richard C. Schwartz, emphasizes the importance of both therapist and client engaging in therapy from the Self, which is the IFS term for one's "spiritual center". The Self is curious about whatever arises in one's present experience and open and accepting toward all manifestations.[170]

Mindfulness relaxation

Mindfulness relaxation uses breathing methods, guided imagery, and other practices to relax the body and mind and help reduce stress.[171]

Schools

[edit]

In 2012 Congressman Tim Ryan of Ohio published A Mindful Nation, and received a $1 million federal grant to teach mindfulness in schools in his home district.[127]

Mindful Kids Miami is a tax-exempt, 501 (c)(3), non-profit corporation established in 2011 dedicated to making age-appropriate mindfulness training available to school children in Miami-Dade County public and private schools. This is primarily accomplished by training educators and other childcare providers to incorporate mindfulness practices in the children's daily activities.[172]

In 2000, The Inner Kids Program, a mindfulness-based program developed for children, was introduced into public and private school curricula in the greater Los Angeles area.[173]

MindUP, a classroom-based program spearheaded by Goldie Hawn's Hawn Foundation, teaches students to self-regulate behavior and mindfully engage in focused concentration required for academic success. For the last decade, MindUP has trained teachers in over 1,000 schools in cities from Arizona to Washington.[174]

The Holistic Life Foundation, a non-profit organization that created an in-school mindfulness program called Mindful Moment, is currently serving almost 350 students daily at Robert W. Coleman Elementary School and approximately 1300 students at Patterson Park High School in Baltimore, Maryland. At Patterson High School, the Mindful Moment program engages the school's faculty along with the students during a 15-minute mindfulness practice at the beginning and end of each school day.[175]

Mindful Life Project, a non-profit 501(c)3 based out of Richmond, California, teaches mindfulness to elementary school students in underserved schools in the South Richmond school district. Utilizing curriculum, "Rise-Up" is a regular school day intervention program serving 430 students weekly, while "Mindful Community" is currently implemented at six South Richmond partner schools. These in-school mindfulness programs have been endorsed by Richmond Mayor Gayle McLaughlin, who has recommended additional funding to expand the program in order to serve all Richmond youth.[citation needed]

Education

[edit]

Mindfulness practices are becoming more common within educational institutions including Elementary and Secondary schools. This has been referred to as part of a 'contemplative turn' in education that has emerged since the turn of the millennium.[176] The applications of mindfulness in schools are aimed at calming and relaxation of students as well as for students and educators to build compassion and empathy for others.[177] An additional benefit to Mindfulness in education is for the practice to reduce anxiety and stress in students.[178] Based on a broad meta-analytical review, scholars said that the application of mindfulness practice enhances the goals of education in the 21st century, which include adapting to a rapidly changing world and being a caring and committed citizen. Within educational systems, the application of mindfulness practices shows an improvement of students' attention and focus, emotional regulation, creativity, and problem solving skills.[179] As discussed by Ergas and Todd, the development of this field since the turn of the millennium has brought diverse possibilities as well as complexities, given the origins of mindfulness within Buddhism and the processes of its secularization and measurement based on science.[145]

Renshaw and Cook state, "As scientific interest in the utility of Mindfulness-Based Intervention (MBI) in schools grew steadily, popular interest in mindfulness in schools seemed to grow exponentially".[180] Despite research on mindfulness being comparatively unexamined, especially with young students, the practice has seen a spike in use within the educational arena. "A relatively recent addition to discourse around preventing school expulsion and failure, mindfulness is gaining popularity for its potential to improve students' social, emotional, behavioral, and learning-related cognitive control, thereby improving academic outcomes".[181] Researchers and educators are interested in how mindfulness can provide optimal conditions for a students' personal development and academic success. Current research on mindfulness in education is limited but can provide insight into the potential benefits for students, and areas of improvement for future studies.[31][182]

Mindfulness in the classroom is being touted as a promising new intervention tool for young students. According to Choudhury and Moses, "Although still marginal and in some cases controversial, secular programs of mindfulness have been implemented with ambitious goals of improving attentional focus of pupils, social-emotional learning in "at-risk" children and youth, not least, to intervene in problems of poverty and incarceration".[183] Emerging research is concerned with studying teachers and programs using mindfulness practices with students and is discovering tension arising from the moral reframing of eastern practices in western school settings. As cited by Renshaw and Cook, "Unlike most other approaches to contemporary school-based intervention, which are squarely grounded in behavioral, cognitive-behavioral, and ecological systems theories, MBIs have their origins in Eastern religious traditions".[180] Some school administrators are concerned about implementing such practices, and parents have been reported to take their children out of mindfulness programs because of their personal religious beliefs. Yet, MBIs continue to be accepted by the mainstream in both primary and secondary schools because, "Mindfulness practices, particularly in relation to children who might otherwise be considered broken or unredeemable, fill a critical niche – one that allows its advocates to imagine a world where people can change, become more compassionate, resilient, reflective, and aware; a world with a viable future".[183] As mindfulness in education continues to develop, ethical consequences will remain a controversial issue because the generic description for the "benefits" and "results" of MBIs are largely concerned with individual and inward-focused achievement, rather than the original Buddhist ideal of global human connection.

Available research reveals a relationship between mindfulness and attention. Semple, Lee, Rosa, & Miller say, "Anxiety can impair attention and promote emotionally reactive behaviors that interfere with the development of good study skills, so it seems reasonable that increased mindfulness would be associated with less anxiety".[184] They conducted a randomized trial of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Children (MBCT-C) that found promise in managing anxiety for elementary school-aged children, and suggests that those who completed the program displayed fewer attention problems. In addition, Flook shows how an eight-week mindfulness awareness program was evaluated in a random and controlled school setting and measured the effects of awareness practices on executive functions in elementary school children. Their findings concluded, "Participation in the mindfulness awareness program was associated with improvements in behavioral regulation, metacognition, and overall executive functions".[185] In the study by Flook, parents and teachers completed questionnaires which propose that participation in mindfulness programs is associated with improvements in child behavioral regulation. These perspectives are a valuable source of data given that caregivers and educators interact with the children daily and across a variety of settings. According to Eklund, Omalley, and Meyer, "School-based practitioners should find promise in the evidence supporting mindfulness-based practices with children, parents, and educators".[181] Lastly, a third study by Zenner, Herrnleben-Kurz, and Walach concluded, "Analysis suggest that mindfulness-based interventions for children and youths are able to increase cognitive capacity of attending and learning by nearly one standard deviation and yield".[179] Application of Mindfulness-Based Interventions continue to increase in popularity and practice.[citation needed][186]

Mindfulness-Based Interventions are rising across western culture, but its effectiveness in school programs is still being determined. Research contends, "Mindfulness-based approaches for adults are effective at enhancing mental health, but few controlled trials have evaluated their effectiveness among young people".[187] Although much of the available studies find a high number of mindfulness acceptability among students and teachers, more research needs to be conducted on its effects on well-being and mental health for students. In a firmly controlled experiment, Johnson, Burke, Brinkman, and Wade evaluated "the impact of an existing and widely available school-based mindfulness program". According to their research, "no improvements were demonstrated on any outcome measured either immediately post-intervention or at three-month follow-up".[188] Many questions remain on which practices best implement effective and reliable mindfulness programs at schools, and further research is needed to identify the optimal methods and measurement tools for mindfulness in education.[citation needed]

Business

[edit]

Mindfulness training appears to be getting popular in the business world, and many large corporations have been incorporating mindfulness practices into their culture.[189][190][191] For example, companies such as Google, Apple, Procter & Gamble, General Mills, Mayo Clinic, and the U.S. Army offer mindfulness coaching, meditation breaks and other resources to their employees to improve workplace functioning.[189][192]

The introduction of mindfulness in corporate settings still remains in early stages and its potential long-term impact requires further assessment. Mindfulness has been found to result in better employee well-being,[193] lower levels of frustration, lower absenteeism and burnout as well as an improved overall work environment.[192]

Law

[edit]

Legal and law enforcement organizations are also showing interest in mindfulness:[194]

  • Harvard Law School's Program on Negotiation hosted a workshop on "Mindfulness in the Law & Alternative Dispute Resolution."[195]
  • Many law firms offer mindfulness classes.[191]

Prison-programs

[edit]

Mindfulness has been taught in prisons, reducing hostility and mood disturbance among inmates, and improving their self-esteem.[196] Additional studies indicate that mindfulness interventions can result in significant reductions in anger, reductions in substance use, increased relaxation capacity, self-regulation and optimism.[197][198]

Government

[edit]

Many government organizations offer mindfulness training.[199] Coping Strategies is an example of a program utilized by United States Armed Forces personnel.[citation needed] The British Parliament organized a mindfulness-session for its members in 2014, led by Ruby Wax.[web 26]

Scientific research

[edit]

Effects and efficacy of mindfulness practice

[edit]

Mindfulness has gained increasing empirical attention since 1970[15][145] and has been studied often as an intervention for stress reduction.[24][200] Meta analyses indicate its beneficial effects for healthy adults,[17][201][202] for adolescents and children,[179][31] as well as for different health-related outcomes including weight management,[203][204][205] psychiatric conditions,[206][207][208] heart disease,[59][53] sleep disorders,[209][210][211] cancer care,[212][213][214][215] adult autism treatment,[216] multiple sclerosis,[217][218] and other health-related conditions.[219][220][221] An often-cited meta-analysis on meditation research published in JAMA in 2014,[222] found insufficient evidence of any effect of meditation programs on positive mood, attention, substance use, eating habits, sleep, and weight, but found that there is moderate evidence that meditation reduces anxiety, depression, and pain. However, this study included a highly heterogeneous group of meditation styles (i.e., it did not focus exclusively on mindfulness meditation), which is a significant limitation of this study. Additionally, while mindfulness is well known to have positive psychological effects among individuals diagnosed with various types of cancers,[215] the evidence is unclear regarding its effectiveness in men with prostate cancer.[214]

Thousands of studies on meditation have been conducted, though the methodological quality of some of the studies is poor. Recent reviews have described many of these issues.[8][page needed][33][223] Nonetheless, mindfulness meditation is a popular subject for research, and many present potential benefits for a wide array of conditions and outcomes. For example, the practice of mindfulness has also been used to improve athletic performance,[224][28] as a beneficial intervention for children with special needs and their caregivers,[225][226][227] as a viable treatment option for people with insomnia[228][229] an effective intervention for healthy aging,[230][231][232] as a strategy for managing dermatological conditions[233] and as a useful intervention during early pregnancy.[234][235][236] Recent studies have also demonstrated that mindfulness meditation significantly attenuates physical pain through multiple, unique mechanisms.[237] Meditation also may allow one to modulate pain. When exposed to pain from heating, the brain scans of the mindfulness meditation participants (by use of functional magnetic resonance imaging) showed their brains notice the pain equally, however it does not get converted to a perceived pain signal. As such they experienced up to 40–50% less pain.[238]

Research has also investigated mindful movements and mindful exercises for different patient populations.[239][240]

Mindfulness practices have also been associated with the development of psychological resilience. Regular mindfulness meditation can help individuals facing trauma or chronic stress to regulate emotions, reduce rumination, and strengthen adaptive coping mechanisms.[241]

Neurological studies

[edit]

Research studies have also focused on the effects of mindfulness on the brain using neuroimaging techniques, physiological measures and behavioral tests.[242][200][243] Research on the neural perspective of how mindfulness meditation works suggests that it exerts its effects in components of attention regulation, body awareness and emotional regulation.[244] When considering aspects such as sense of responsibility, authenticity, compassion, self-acceptance and character, studies have shown that mindfulness meditation contributes to a more coherent and healthy sense of self and identity.[245][246] Neuroimaging techniques suggest that mindfulness practices such as mindfulness meditation are associated with "changes in the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, temporo-parietal junction, fronto-limbic network and default mode network structures."[244][247] Further, mindfulness meditation may prevent or delay the onset of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.[248] Additionally, mindfulness-induced emotional and behavioral changes have been found to be related to functional and structural changes in the brain.[247][249] It has also been suggested that the default mode network of the brain can be used as a potential biomarker for monitoring the therapeutic benefits of meditation.[250] Recent research also suggest that the practice of mindfulness could influence genetic expression leading to a reduced risk of inflammation-related diseases and favourable changes in biomarkers.[251][252]

Grey matter concentrations in brain regions that regulate emotion, self-referential processing, learning and memory processes have shown changes in density following MBSR.[253][250] Additionally, MBSR practice has been associated with improvement of the immune system[254][55] which could explain the correlation between stress reduction and increased quality of life.[255] Part of these changes are a result of the thickening of the prefrontal cortex (executive functioning) and hippocampus (learning and memorisation ability), the shrinking of the amygdala (emotion and stress response) and the strengthening of the connections between brain cells.[256][257][258][259] Long-term meditators have larger amounts of gyrification ("folding" of the cortex, which may allow the brain to process information faster) than people who do not meditate. Further, a direct correlation was found between the amount of gyrification and the number of meditation years, possibly providing further proof of the brain's neuroplasticity, or ability to adapt to environmental changes.[256]

Associations of mindfulness with other variables

[edit]

Mindfulness (as a trait, distinguished from mindfulness practice) has been linked to many outcomes. In an overview,[34] Keng, Smoski, and Robins summarize: "Trait mindfulness has been associated with higher levels of life satisfaction, agreeableness, conscientiousness, vitality, self esteem, empathy, sense of autonomy, competence, optimism, and pleasant affect. A 2020 study found links between dispositional mindfulness and prosocial behavior.[260] Studies have also demonstrated significant negative correlations between mindfulness and depression, neuroticism, absentmindedness, dissociation, rumination, cognitive reactivity, social anxiety, difficulties in emotion regulation, experiential avoidance, alexithymia, intensity of delusional experience in the context of psychosis, and general psychological symptoms." (References to underlying studies omitted from quotation.)

Effects on mindfulness

[edit]

The mechanisms that make people less or more mindful have been researched less than the effects of mindfulness programmes, so little is known about which components of mindfulness practice are relevant for promoting mindfulness. For example, meta-analyses have shown that mindfulness practice does increase mindfulness when compared to active control groups.[31][202] This may be because we do not know how to measure mindfulness. It could also be that mindfulness is dose-dependent and increases with more experience.[261][262] To counter that, Bergomi et al.[263] found that "results provide evidence for the associations between self-reported mindfulness and meditation practice and suggest that mindfulness is particularly associated with continued practice in the present, rather than with accumulated practice over years."

Some research into other mechanisms has been done. One study[264] conceptualized such mechanisms in terms of competition for attention. In a test of that framework, mindfulness was found to be associated (as predicted) with having an activated intention to be mindful, with feeling good, and with not being hurried or very busy. Regarding the relationship between feeling good and being mindful, a different study[265] found that causality probably works both ways: feeling good increases mindfulness, and mindfulness increases feeling good.

One theory suggests an additional mechanism termed as reperceiving. Reperceiving is the beneficial effect that comes after the process of being mindful after all the intention, attention, and attitude has been experienced. Through reperceiving there is a shift in perspective. Reperceiving permits disassociation from thoughts, emotions, and physical sensations, and allows one to exist with them instead of being defined by them.[266]

Adverse effects

[edit]

Meditation (of which mindfulness is just a version) has also been correlated with unpleasant experiences.[267][268][269][270] In some cases, it has also been linked to psychosis and suicide.[271][272][273][274] Both the soundness of its scientific foundations and the desirability of its societal effects have been questioned.[275][276][277][278]

In one study, published in 2019, of 1,232 regular meditators with at least two months of meditation experience, about a quarter reported having had particularly unpleasant meditation-related experiences (such as anxiety, fear, distorted emotions or thoughts, altered sense of self or the world), which they thought may have been caused by their meditation practice. Meditators with high levels of repetitive negative thinking and those who only engage in deconstructive meditation were more likely to report unpleasant side effects. Adverse effects were less frequently reported in women and religious meditators.[279]

Another study from 2021 on the effects of mindfulness-based programs (MBPs) found negative side-effects in 37% of the sample while lasting bad effects in 6–14% of the sample.[280] Most of the side effects were related to signs of dysregulated arousal (i.e., hyperarousal and dissociation). The majority of these adverse events occurred as a result of regular practice at home or during class, something that challenges the notion that it is only intense practice that can give rise to negative experiences; as it turns out intense all-day retreats or working with difficulty practice accounts for only 6% of adverse effects. The symptoms most readily recognized as negative were those of hyperarousal (e.g., anxiety and insomnia). On the other hand,

while dissociation symptoms (e.g., emotional blunting, derealization, and self-disturbance) were both less frequent and less likely to be appraised as negative, they were still associated with more than 5–10 times greater risk for lasting bad effects… This means that re-appraisal of dissociative symptoms via non-judgmental acceptance is not sufficient to prevent impairment in functioning and should not constitute the only response. Instead, training in how to recognize dissociative symptoms as potential indicators of the need for intervention, which have recently been added to some mindfulness teacher training programs may be important.[281]

There is also mounting evidence that meditation can disturb various prosocial behaviors. By blunting emotions, in particular the social emotions of guilt and shame, it may produce deficits in the feelings of empathy and remorse thus creating calm but callous practitioners. In one study with 1400 participants researchers found that focused-breathing meditation can dampen the relationship between transgressions and the desire to engage in reparative prosocial behaviors.[282] Another study found that meditation can increase the trait of selfishness. The study, consisting of two interrelated parts and totaling 691 participants, found that a mindfulness induction, compared to a control condition, led to decreased prosocial behavior. This effect was moderated by self-construals such that people with relatively independent self-construals became less prosocial while people with relatively interdependent self-construals became more so. In the western world where independent self-construals generally predominate meditation may thus have potentially detrimental effects.[283] These new findings about meditation's socially problematic effects imply that it can be contraindicated to use meditation as a tool to handle acute personal conflicts or relational difficulties; in the words of Andrew Hafenbrack, one of the authors of the study, "If we 'artificially' reduce our guilt by meditating it away, we may end up with worse relationships, or even fewer relationships".[284]

Difficult experiences encountered in meditation are mentioned in traditional sources; and some may be considered to be an expected part of the process, e.g., seven stages of purification mentioned in Theravāda Buddhism. Possible "unwholesome or frightening visions" are mentioned in a practical manual on vipassanā meditation.[285] Classical sources have various terms for "meditation sickness" and related difficulties, such as zouhuorumo (走火入魔; 'fire possession'), chanbing (禪病; 'Chan disease') and mojing (魔境; 'demonic states').[286]

An article from the Journal of Buddhist Ethics states,

Problematic experiences such as strange sensations, unexplained pains, psychological instability, undesired hallucinations, sexual anomalies, uncontrollable behaviors, demonic possession, suicidality, and so forth seem to be quite well-known and well-documented across traditions.[286]

Concerns and criticism

[edit]

Scholarly research

[edit]

Many of the above cited review studies also indicate the necessity for more high-quality research in this field such as conducting intervention studies using larger sample sizes, the use of more randomized controlled studies and the need for providing more methodological details in reported studies.[8][page needed][34] The majority of studies also either measure mindfulness as a trait, and in research that use mindfulness interventions in clinical practice, the lack of true randomisation poses a problem for understanding the true effectiveness of mindfulness. Experimental methods using randomised samples, though, suggest that mindfulness as a state or temporary practice can influence felt emotions such as disgust and promote abstract decision-making.[287][288][289] There are also a few review studies that have found little difference between mindfulness interventions and control groups, though they did also indicate that their intervention group was treated too briefly for the research to be conclusive.[290][291] In some domains, such as sport, a lack of internal validity across studies prevents any strong claims being made about the effects of mindfulness.[28] These studies also list the need for more robust research investigations. Several issues pertaining to the assessment of mindfulness have also been identified including the current use of self-report questionnaires.[8][page needed][34][292] Potential for bias also exists to the extent that researchers in the field are also practitioners and possibly subject to pressures to publish positive or significant results.[11]

Various scholars have criticized how mindfulness has been defined or represented in recent Western psychology publications.[77][293] These modern understandings depart significantly from the accounts of mindfulness in early Buddhist texts and authoritative commentaries in the Theravada and Indian Mahayana traditions.[293]: 62 [294] Adam Valerio has introduced the idea that conflict between academic disciplines over how mindfulness is defined, understood, and popularly presented may be indicative of a personal, institutional, or paradigmatic battle for ownership over mindfulness, one where academics, researchers, and other writers are invested as individuals in much the same way as religious communities.[128]

Shortcomings

[edit]

The popularization of mindfulness as a "commodity"[web 27] has been criticized, being termed "McMindfulness" by some critics.[web 28][web 29][295] For example, Ronald Purser discusses that there is certainly a beneficial aspect to mindfulness, such as reducing stress, however, the issue is the "product they are selling and how its been packaged."[20] According to Harrington and Dunne, critics argue that "Mindfulness [...] was never supposed to be about weight loss, better sex, helping children perform better in school, helping employees be more productive in the workplace, or even improving the functioning of anxious, depressed people. It was never supposed to be a merchandized commodity to be bought and sold."[15] According to John Safran, the popularity of mindfulness is the result of a marketing strategy:[web 27] "McMindfulness is the marketing of a constructed dream; an idealized lifestyle; an identity makeover."[296][web 27] The psychologist Thomas Joiner says that modern mindfulness meditation has been "corrupted" for commercial gain by self-help celebrities, and suggests that it encourages unhealthy narcissistic and self-obsessed mindsets.[297][298]

According to Purser and Loy, mindfulness is not being used as a means to awaken to insight in the "unwholesome roots of greed, ill will and delusion,"[web 28] but reshaped into a "banal, therapeutic, self-help technique" that has the opposite effect of reinforcing those passions.[web 28] While mindfulness is marketed as a means to reduce stress, in a Buddhist context it is part of an all-embracing ethical program to foster "wise action, social harmony, and compassion."[web 28] Purser explains that ultimately mindfulness is being stripped from its original Buddhist roots, losing its emphasis on ethical training and liberation from attachment, and is instead presented mainly as a therapeutic self-help method.[20] The privatization of mindfulness neglects the societal and organizational causes of stress and discomfort, instead propagating adaptation to these circumstances.[web 28] According to Bhikkhu Bodhi, "[A]bsent a sharp social critique, Buddhist practices could easily be used to justify and stabilize the status quo, becoming a reinforcement of consumer capitalism."[web 28] The popularity of this new brand of mindfulness has resulted in the commercialization of meditation through self-help books, guided meditation classes, and mindfulness retreats.

Mindfulness is said to be a $4bn industry. More than 60,000 books for sale on Amazon have a variant of "mindfulness" in their title, touting the benefits of Mindful Parenting, Mindful Eating, Mindful Teaching, Mindful Therapy, Mindful Leadership, Mindful Finance, a Mindful Nation, and Mindful Dog Owners, to name just a few.[299]

Buddhist commentators have criticized the movement as being presented as equivalent to Buddhist practice, while in reality it is very possibly denatured with undesirable consequences, such as being ungrounded in the traditional reflective morality and therefore, astray from traditional Buddhist ethics. Criticisms suggest it to be either de-moralized or re-moralized into clinically based ethics. The conflict is often presented with concern to the teacher's credentials and qualifications, rather than the student's actual practice. Reformed Buddhist-influenced practices are being standardized and manualized in a distinct separation from Buddhism - which is seen as a religion based in monastic temples - and expressed as "mindfulness" in a new psychology ethic, practiced in modern meditation centers.[300]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Printed sources

[edit]

Web sources

[edit]
  1. ^ Farias M (June 5, 2015). "Mindfulness Has Lost Its Buddhist Roots, and it may not be doing you good". The Conversation. Retrieved 2020-02-05. What was once a tool for spiritual exploration has been turned into a panacea for the modern age — a cure-all for common human problems, from stress, to anxiety, to depression. [...] Yet the potential for emotional and psychological disturbance is rarely talked about by mindfulness researchers, the media, or mentioned in training courses. [...] Mindfulness has been separated from its roots, stripped of its ethical and spiritual connotations, and sold to us as a therapeutic tool. [...] Instead, as Giles Coren recently claimed, this technique has been turned into a McMindfulness which only reinforces one's egocentric drives.
  2. ^ a b "» Geoffrey Samuel Transcultural Psychiatry". Archived from the original on 2020-11-01. Retrieved 2019-04-30.
  3. ^ a b "Translator for the Buddha: An Interview with Bhikkhu Bodhi". www.inquiringmind.com. Retrieved 2018-01-07.
  4. ^ Young, Shinzen (April 2015). "See Hear Feel: An Introduction (Draft)" (PDF). 1.8.
  5. ^ a b c d "Thesaurus results for 'Mindfulness'". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 2018-01-07.
  6. ^ "Component Selection for 'mindfulness'". dico.isc.cnrs.fr. Retrieved 2018-01-07.
  7. ^ a b c "I found great synonyms for "mindfulness" on the new Thesaurus.com!". www.thesaurus.com. Retrieved 2018-01-07.
  8. ^ Sister Ayya Khema. "All of Us". Access to Insight. Retrieved 2009-03-16.
  9. ^ Reginald A. Ray (Summer 2004). "Vipashyana". Buddhadharma: The Practitioner's Quarterly. Shambhala Sun Foundation. Archived from the original on 2014-01-02. Retrieved 2013-05-30.
  10. ^ a b Satyadarshin. "Friends of the Western Buddhist Order (FWBO): Buddhism and Mindfulness". madhyamavani.fwbo.org. Retrieved 2018-01-07.
  11. ^ a b Kabat-Zinn, Jon. "Mindfulness Meditation (For Everyday Life)" (PDF).
  12. ^ Finseth IF. "The Emergence of Transcendentalism". virginia.edu. The University of Virginia. Archived from the original on 2014-11-06. Retrieved 2014-11-09.
  13. ^ "Stress Reduction Program". University of Massachusetts Worcester Campus Center for Mindfulness. Archived from the original on 2012-04-14. The Stress Reduction Program, founded by Dr. Jon Kabat-Zinn in 1979...
  14. ^ Drage M (February 22, 2018). "A history of mindfulness". Wellcome Collection. Retrieved 2019-12-13.
  15. ^ "What Is Mindfulness?". The Greater Good Science Center. The Greater Good Science Center at the University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 2014-04-24.
  16. ^ Israel I (May 30, 2013). "What's the Difference Between Mindfulness, Mindfulness Meditation and Basic Meditation?". The Huffington Post.
  17. ^ Bernhard T (June 6, 2011). "6 Benefits of Practicing Mindfulness Outside of Meditation". Psychology Today.
  18. ^ Wang, Y.; Lei, S. M.; Fan, J. (2023). "Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Promoting Athletic Performance and Related Factors among Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20 (3): 2038. doi:10.3390/ijerph20032038. PMC 9915077. PMID 36767403.
  19. ^ Komaroff A (March 31, 2014). "Does "mindfulness meditation" really help relieve stress and anxiety?". Ask Doctor K. Harvard Health Publications. Archived from the original on 2020-01-30. Retrieved 2014-04-22.
  20. ^ "The Mindfulness Body Scan".
  21. ^ "Beginner's Body Scan Meditation". mindful.org. January 27, 2023.
  22. ^ "Body Scan Meditation (Greater Good in Action)". ggia.berkeley.edu.
  23. ^ "History of MBSR". University of Massachusetts Medical School. November 17, 2016.
  24. ^ "What is Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction?". Mindful Living Programs. Archived from the original on 2006-07-18. Retrieved 2014-04-15.
  25. ^ a b "What is Mindfulness based Pain Management (MBPM)?". Breathworks CIC. January 22, 2019. Retrieved 2020-05-22.
  26. ^ Booth R (May 7, 2014). "Politicians joined by Ruby Wax as parliament pauses for meditation". The Guardian – via www.theguardian.com.
  27. ^ a b c Safran, Jeremy D. (June 13, 2014). "McMindfulness". www.psychologytoday.com. Retrieved 2015-04-02.
  28. ^ a b c d e f Purser, Ron; Loy, David (July 1, 2013). "Beyond McMindfulness". HuffPost.
  29. ^ Caring-Lobel A (July 2, 2013). "Trike Contributing Editor David Loy takes on "McMindfulness"". Tricycle: The Buddhist Review.

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Mindfulness is a mental practice involving the intentional direction of attention to present-moment experiences, such as thoughts, emotions, and sensations, without judgment or attachment, with roots in the Buddhist tradition of sati—a form of clear, discerning awareness central to meditation and ethical living as outlined in early texts like the Satipatthana Sutta. In modern secular applications, pioneered by Jon Kabat-Zinn through the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program established in 1979 at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, it is defined as "the awareness that arises through paying attention, on purpose, in the present moment, non-judgmentally." This adaptation has led to widespread integration into , , and , with programs like MBSR and (MBCT) demonstrating modest empirical benefits in meta-analyses, including small to moderate reductions in anxiety, depression, and perceived stress, alongside improvements in quality and emotional . imaging studies further indicate structural changes, such as increased gray matter density in regions associated with and processing, following regular practice. However, effects vary widely across individuals, with some randomized trials showing limited long-term efficacy compared to active controls, underscoring the need for personalized application rather than universal endorsement. Notable controversies include reports of adverse effects, with studies documenting that 25-60% of practitioners experience negative outcomes such as heightened anxiety, dissociation, , or re-experiencing of trauma, particularly in intensive retreats or among those with pre-existing vulnerabilities, challenging the narrative of mindfulness as inherently benign. has also drawn criticism for diluting traditional ethical components, potentially prioritizing profit over rigorous training, though peer-reviewed evidence supports targeted use in when delivered by qualified instructors.

Definitions and Conceptual Foundations

Etymological and Philosophical Origins

The English term "mindfulness" serves as a translation of the Pali word sati, which appears prominently in the early Buddhist canon, the Tipiṭaka, compiled around the 1st century BCE from oral traditions dating to the 5th century BCE. Etymologically, sati derives from a root meaning "to remember" or "to bear in mind," connoting an active retention of awareness toward objects of experience, rather than passive observation. This interpretation aligns with classical commentaries, such as those by Buddhaghosa in the 5th century CE Visuddhimagga, where sati functions as a guardian of the mind, preventing forgetfulness amid sensory inputs. Philosophically, sati underpins sammā sati (right mindfulness), the seventh element of the outlined in early texts like the (circa 5th century BCE), which prescribes it as a direct means for purifying the mind, extinguishing suffering, and realizing nibbāna. In this framework, sati is not an isolated faculty but integrates with ethical conduct (sīla) and concentration (samādhi), fostering insight into impermanence (anicca), suffering (dukkha), and non-self (). The , a foundational discourse preserved in the Dīgha and Majjhima Nikāyas, details its application through four establishments—contemplation of the body, feelings, mind, and phenomena—emphasizing bare attention to phenomena without attachment or aversion to cultivate discriminative wisdom (vipassanā). Early Buddhist philosophy positions sati as a counter to delusion (moha), enabling causal discernment of dependent origination (paṭiccasamuppāda), where unmindful lapses perpetuate cyclic existence (saṃsāra). Unlike later developments in Mahāyāna traditions, which expanded it into broader contemplative schemas, its canonical form in Theravāda sources stresses practical discernment over metaphysical speculation, grounded in empirical observation of mental processes. This origin predates Western appropriations, with the term's modern rendering traceable to 19th-century translations by scholars like T.W. Rhys Davids, who rendered sati as "mindfulness" to evoke attentive presence, though debates persist on whether this fully conveys its mnemonic and ethical dimensions.

Psychological and Neuroscientific Definitions

In , mindfulness is operationalized as a form of intentional, non-judgmental to present-moment experiences, encompassing both momentary states and enduring traits. This conceptualization, prominently articulated by in his development of (MBSR) in 1979, describes mindfulness as "the awareness that arises through paying in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally." Empirical assessments in psychological research, such as the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, further delineate it into facets including observing sensations, describing experiences, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non-reactivity to inner experience, facilitating measurement of dispositional mindfulness as a stable individual difference correlated with reduced rumination and improved emotional regulation. These definitions prioritize metacognitive processes over content, distinguishing mindfulness from mere relaxation or focused concentration by emphasizing acceptance without aversion or attachment. Neuroscientific perspectives frame mindfulness as a trainable cognitive modulating , emotion ing, and self-referential thought, often studied through of practitioners. Functional MRI studies reveal that trait mindfulness correlates with decreased reactivity to emotional stimuli, suggesting attenuated threat responses, and enhanced activation in the (ACC) and prefrontal regions during tasks, indicative of improved conflict monitoring and executive control. Structural changes, such as increased gray matter density in the insula and hippocampus observed in longitudinal interventions like MBSR, further link sustained mindfulness practice to in areas supporting interoceptive awareness and . Unlike psychological definitions that emphasize subjective phenomenology, neuroscientific accounts ground mindfulness in distributed network dynamics, including reduced activity for diminished , though causal inferences remain tentative due to reliance on correlational designs and self-report confounds in many studies.

Distinctions Between Trait, State, and Practice

In , mindfulness practice refers to deliberate exercises, such as focused or open monitoring meditation, aimed at cultivating momentary of present experiences without judgment. These practices, often derived from contemplative traditions but adapted in secular contexts, induce transient shifts in and during engagement. Unlike inherent tendencies, practice requires intentional effort and can vary in duration and technique, with empirical studies showing it elevates immediate but does not guarantee long-term changes without repetition. State mindfulness denotes the acute, situational experience of nonjudgmental to current sensations, thoughts, and , typically heightened during or immediately following a session. It is measured via short-term scales assessing present-moment and , revealing variability across contexts rather than consistency. Neuroimaging evidence indicates state mindfulness correlates with reduced activity and enhanced sensory processing in the moment, effects that dissipate post-practice unless reinforced. This distinguishes it from baseline tendencies, as state levels predict task-specific outcomes like but show only moderate correlations with dispositional factors (r ≈ 0.20–0.40). Trait mindfulness, conversely, represents a stable individual difference in the propensity to maintain present-focused, nonreactive awareness across daily life, independent of active practice. Assessed through self-report inventories like the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, it exhibits test-retest reliability over months and links to broader personality dimensions, such as and emotional stability. Longitudinal suggest trait levels moderate responses to stressors, with higher traits buffering against rumination via habitual decoupling from automatic thoughts. Unlike state, trait mindfulness shows weaker immediate malleability but can incrementally rise through sustained practice, as meta-analyses report small-to-moderate gains (d ≈ 0.3–0.5) in interventions spanning 8–12 weeks. The distinctions manifest in differential predictors and outcomes: practices reliably boost state mindfulness (effect sizes up to d = 1.0 in novices), yet only partially transfer to trait enhancements, with meditation experience moderating the state-trait link (stronger in experts, r > 0.50). Causal models posit repeated state induction rewires attentional habits, but individual factors like baseline can impede trait consolidation, underscoring that practice alone does not equate to enduring disposition.
AspectTrait MindfulnessState MindfulnessPractice
DefinitionEnduring tendency for nonjudgmental present-moment awareness.Transient level of focused, accepting attention in the moment.Intentional activities (e.g., meditation) to evoke awareness.
Temporal StabilityHigh; persists across situations and time.Low; fluctuates with context or recent activity.Episodic; depends on session frequency and adherence.
MeasurementTrait scales (e.g., FFMQ; stable scores).State inventories (e.g., SMS; immediate post-task).Adherence logs or protocol fidelity metrics.
Relation to OutcomesPredicts chronic well-being and personality resilience.Influences acute performance (e.g., decision-making).Generates state effects; cumulatively builds trait.

Historical Development

Early Buddhist and Eastern Traditions

Mindfulness, termed sati in the language, emerged in the teachings of Siddhartha Gautama, , who lived circa 563–483 BCE according to scholarly consensus based on historical and archaeological evidence. In early Buddhist discourses preserved in the , sati denotes a balanced directed toward present-moment experiences, serving as a foundational element for ethical conduct, concentration, and insight leading to liberation from suffering. The primary textual exposition appears in the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta ( 10 and 22), which delineates the four foundations of mindfulness: the body, feelings, mind, and dhammas (phenomena or mental objects). Practitioners cultivate awareness of the body through observation of breathing, postures, bodily activities, anatomical parts, the four elements, and stages of corpse decay; feelings by noting pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral tones, distinguishing worldly from unworldly varieties; the mind by recognizing states such as lust, aversion, or delusion versus their absence; and dhammas by contemplating the five hindrances (e.g., sensual desire, ill-will) and (e.g., mindfulness itself, investigation, ). These practices, emphasized with clear comprehension and free from or aversion, aim to discern impermanence, , and non-self in phenomena. Pre-Buddhist Indian traditions contributed conceptual precursors, such as smṛti (remembrance) in Vedic texts and dhyāna (meditative absorption) in the (circa 800–200 BCE), which involved focused contemplation for . In , sakshi or witness consciousness, articulated in the Upanishads and Bhagavad Gītā, entails detached observation of mental processes to transcend identification with the body-mind, positing an eternal ātman (self) unlike Buddhism's anātman (no-self). However, early Buddhist sati innovates by emphasizing bare, non-reactive attention to all experience domains without reliance on a permanent self, distinguishing it from more concentrative Vedic and yogic practices. In broader Eastern contexts, analogous awareness practices appear in Taoism's neiguan (inner observation) from texts like the (circa 6th century BCE), promoting harmony with through effortless presence, though lacking Buddhism's systematic foundations. Confucian traditions, emphasizing ritual propriety over , show minimal direct parallels to mindfulness as sustained phenomenological awareness. Thus, early mindfulness crystallized distinctly within amid ancient Indian contemplative lineages.

Transmission to the West and Secular Adaptations

Interest in practices, including elements of mindfulness, reached the West in the mid-19th century through translations of texts by scholars such as Rhys Davids and the influence of figures like , who promoted Eastern philosophies amid growing . By the early 20th century, D.T. Suzuki's writings on from the 1920s onward introduced meditative awareness to Western intellectuals, emphasizing direct experience over doctrine. This laid groundwork for broader adoption, accelerated in the 1950s and 1960s by the —authors like and —and the counterculture movement, which embraced as a tool for personal liberation amid disillusionment with . The establishment of Western meditation centers marked a pivotal transmission phase: in 1962, Shunryu Suzuki founded the , adapting Soto Zen practices for lay Americans; meanwhile, in 1975, , , and Joseph Goldstein created the in , drawing from vipassana traditions studied in to teach non-sectarian mindfulness. Thich Nhat Hanh further popularized "engaged mindfulness" in the West during the 1960s era, integrating awareness practices into activism and daily life through works like The Miracle of Mindfulness (1975), influencing figures across spiritual and secular lines. Secular adaptations emerged prominently in clinical contexts to bypass religious connotations, prioritizing empirical utility for stress and . developed (MBSR) in 1979 at the Medical Center, an eight-week program stripping Buddhist practices to core techniques like body scans and breath awareness, integrated with Western stress science for and illness patients. This model, tested in over 200 medical centers by the , emphasized measurable outcomes without ethical precepts or rebirth concepts. Building on MBSR, (MBCT) was formulated in the late by Zindel Segal, Mark Williams, and John Teasdale, merging mindfulness with to prevent depression relapse; its efficacy was supported by randomized trials showing reduced recurrence rates by up to 50% in at-risk groups. These programs facilitated institutional uptake in and , with adaptations like school-based mindfulness appearing by the , though critiques note potential dilution of original contemplative depth for .

Modern Popularization and Institutionalization

The secular adaptation and popularization of mindfulness accelerated in the late through structured clinical programs designed for non-religious contexts. In 1979, established the (MBSR) program at the Medical Center's Stress Reduction Clinic, drawing from techniques to address and illness in patients unresponsive to conventional treatments. This eight-week course, involving practices like body scans and , emphasized empirical observation over spiritual doctrine, marking a pivotal shift toward integrating mindfulness into Western . MBSR's dissemination was propelled by Kabat-Zinn's publications and research collaborations, with his 1990 book Full Catastrophe Living outlining the protocol and reaching broad audiences beyond clinical settings. By the early 2000s, derivative programs emerged, including (MBCT), developed between 1992 and 2002 by Zindel Segal, Mark Williams, and John Teasdale, which fused MBSR elements with to mitigate depression recurrence risks. These initiatives gained institutional traction amid growing evidence from randomized trials, though early adoption often preceded robust long-term validation, reflecting enthusiasm in academic and medical circles for stress mitigation tools. Institutionalization expanded mindfulness into diverse sectors starting in the 2000s. In healthcare, MBSR and MBCT were incorporated into hospital protocols, such as at , where training reduced clinician burnout by approximately 50% in targeted groups by 2020. Medical schools, including those in and curricula, began embedding mindfulness modules to bolster student resilience and patient interaction skills. Corporate adoption surged, with programs like Google's Search Inside Yourself (launched 2007, formalized 2013) promoting mindfulness for productivity and emotional regulation, influencing firms amid neoliberal emphases on individual over systemic reforms. By the 2010s, mindfulness permeated education and , with initiatives like the UK's Mindfulness in Schools Project (established 2011) integrating brief practices into curricula to enhance student focus and well-being, though implementation varied by district funding and teacher training. applications, such as the U.S. Army's Mindfulness-Based Mind Fitness Training (2008 onward), aimed to improve soldier resilience against PTSD, reflecting broader governmental interest in cost-effective interventions. This proliferation coincided with a commercial boom, including apps and retreats generating billions in market value by 2019, yet critics noted risks of diluting practices into superficial tools that mask underlying or societal stressors without addressing causal factors.

Practices and Implementation

Core Techniques and Protocols

Core techniques in mindfulness practice emphasize formal exercises to develop sustained to present-moment experiences, including bodily sensations, breath, and mental phenomena, without judgment or reactivity. These practices, adapted from traditions such as vipassana, form the basis of secular programs and include focused methods, where is anchored to a single object like the breath, and open monitoring approaches, which involve non-reactive observation of arising thoughts and sensations. A primary technique is the body scan , in which practitioners systematically direct attention through different regions of the body, typically starting from the toes and progressing to the head, noting any sensations, tension, or discomfort without attempting to change them. This 20- to 45-minute exercise, often performed lying down, aims to enhance interoceptive awareness and reduce habitual dissociation from physical states, serving as a recommended practice for mental reset by interrupting rumination when sessions last 10 minutes or longer for deeper effects. Breath awareness meditation involves selecting the natural rhythm of and as the focal point, gently redirecting back to the breath whenever the mind wanders, which cultivates attentional stability and interrupts automatic thought patterns. Short daily sessions of 5-10 minutes can specifically help reduce rumination by repeatedly redirecting attention to the breath. Grounding techniques, such as the 5-4-3-2-1 method—identifying five things one can see, four one can touch, three one can hear, two one can smell, and one one can taste—offer a rapid means to anchor awareness in the present and interrupt rumination or mind-wandering. For addressing mind-wandering, strategies include mentally noting distractions and pairing interruption cues, such as saying "stop," with physical actions like standing or drinking water to facilitate refocusing. Open monitoring meditation builds on focused practices by expanding awareness to encompass a broader field of experience, such as monitoring the flow of thoughts, , or environmental stimuli without attachment or aversion, fostering metacognitive insight into mental processes. Mindful movement practices, including gentle or , integrate awareness into physical activity, directing attention to sensations of balance, alignment, and motion to bridge formal sitting practices with daily functioning. These techniques are commonly delivered through structured protocols like (MBSR), an eight-week program developed by in 1979 at the Medical Center. MBSR involves weekly 2.5-hour group sessions, 45 minutes of daily home practice, and a full-day , progressively introducing body scan in week one, breath and sitting meditation thereafter, and throughout, with emphasis on both formal and informal applications such as mindful eating or listening. Mindfulness integration practices extend these techniques into daily life to sustain long-term benefits, encompassing informal daily exercises like mindful eating, commuting, or interpersonal interactions including mindful listening, which involves non-judgmental attention to auditory experiences such as ambient sounds upon waking, distraction-free conversations during the day with focus on nonverbal cues, tone, and non-interruptive responses, or sessions with music or nature sounds to observe evoked bodily sensations and emotions; reflection prompts and journaling to process experiences and cultivate insights; behavioral integration techniques such as habit stacking or cue-based reminders to embed awareness in routines; and post-program support systems including booster sessions or peer groups to promote adherence. Consistent application of mindful listening fosters presence, improves communication, reduces stress, and enhances present-moment awareness.

Variations Across Contexts

Mindfulness practices adapt to contextual demands, altering structure, emphasis, and integration with surrounding frameworks to align with specific goals and populations. In clinical settings, programs like (MBSR), an 8-week protocol involving guided , body awareness, and gentle , prioritize empirical outcomes such as symptom reduction in or anxiety, with adaptations stripping overt religious elements to fit secular healthcare models. Similarly, (MBCT) integrates mindfulness with cognitive techniques for relapse prevention in depression, showing moderate evidence for efficacy in randomized trials, though effects may stem partly from non-specific factors like expectation rather than unique mechanisms. In and contexts, mindfulness interventions shorten durations to 10-20 minute sessions, embedding them in organizational routines to target and burnout, with meta-analyses indicating small-to-moderate reductions in perceived stress and psychological distress among employees. These adaptations often reinterpret practices through a performance lens, such as "mindful ," but qualitative studies reveal interpretive divergences: some view them as tools for emotional regulation, while others critique them as commodified, potentially overlooking deeper self-inquiry in favor of superficial stress management. Evidence suggests benefits for work-related outcomes like reduced , yet long-term retention and causal attribution remain inconsistent across studies. Military applications further modify protocols for high-stress environments, incorporating resonant with service (e.g., "tactical " over "") and team-based elements to enhance collective resilience and , with emerging randomized evidence supporting PTSD symptom alleviation in veterans. Adaptations address logistical barriers like deployment schedules through abbreviated formats and address stigma by framing mindfulness as performance enhancement akin to physical training. In educational contexts, particularly higher education, programs combine sitting with movement practices to foster attention and emotional regulation among students, though implementation varies widely and empirical support for broad academic gains is preliminary. Contrasting these secular variants, religious contexts—rooted in traditions like —embed mindfulness within ethical precepts and soteriological aims, such as insight into impermanence for liberation, differing from Western adaptations that emphasize present-moment decoupled from metaphysical commitments. Secular versions, while derived from these origins, promote neutrality on spiritual matters, potentially limiting transformative depth by omitting contemplative elements like non-attachment to outcomes, as perceived differently by Buddhist-informed versus secular practitioners. Frameworks for adaptation stress , recommending retention of core attentional training while tailoring to avoid dilution of or imposition of unrelated ideologies. Overall, while adaptations enable broader , their to original constructs and sustained benefits hinge on rigorous , with biases in academic reporting—favoring positive findings—necessitating scrutiny of null or adverse outcomes in underreported trials.

Role of Discipline and Ethical Frameworks

In traditional Buddhist contexts, mindfulness (sati), as outlined in the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta, is integrated into a broader ethical framework known as sīla, which encompasses moral discipline through adherence to precepts such as refraining from killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, false speech, and intoxicants. This ethical foundation is essential for cultivating the mental clarity required for effective mindfulness practice, as violations of sīla generate remorse and agitation that hinder concentration (samādhi) and insight (vipassanā). Practitioners are instructed to establish sīla prior to engaging in mindfulness meditation, viewing it as a prerequisite that purifies the mind from ethical defilements, thereby enabling sustained observation of phenomena without distraction. Discipline manifests in the committed observance of these precepts and the application of right effort to abandon unwholesome states, forming the initial stages of the where sammā sati (right mindfulness) bridges sīla and samādhi. In vipassanā traditions, such as those derived from the Satipaṭṭhāna, ethical restraint is not merely preparatory but dynamically supports mindfulness by fostering harmlessness and self-regulation, which counteract the five hindrances (sensual desire, ill-will, sloth, restlessness, and doubt). Texts emphasize that without this disciplined ethical base, mindfulness risks becoming fragmented or ineffective, as the practitioner's actions must align with non-harm to sustain the introspective stability needed for insight into impermanence, suffering, and non-self. Secular adaptations of mindfulness, such as (MBSR), frequently decouple these ethical frameworks to enhance accessibility, focusing primarily on attentional training without mandating precepts. Critics contend this separation can lead to incomplete outcomes or ethical pitfalls, as traditional sources assert that underpin the causal mechanisms for transformative effects, potentially rendering isolated mindfulness vulnerable to misuse or superficiality. Empirical investigations into ethics-integrated programs suggest enhanced long-term adherence and reduced reactivity compared to technique-only approaches, though randomized controlled trials remain limited and often highlight the need for further causal analysis.

Theoretical Models and Mechanisms

Cognitive and Behavioral Models

Cognitive models of mindfulness emphasize processes such as attention regulation, metacognitive awareness, and decentering from automatic thought patterns. One influential framework, proposed by et al., posits that mindfulness operates through intentional attention with an open, non-judgmental attitude, leading to "reperceiving"—a metacognitive shift that allows individuals to observe mental contents as transient phenomena rather than identifying with them. This reperceiving is hypothesized to facilitate adaptive outcomes by enabling exposure to internal experiences, promoting of maladaptive conditioned responses, and fostering cognitive and behavioral flexibility. Empirical tests of this model, such as in mindfulness-based interventions, have shown associations between increased reperceiving and reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression, though causal mediation remains under investigation due to reliance on self-report measures and correlational designs. Metacognitive models further refine this by framing mindfulness as enhanced meta-, where practitioners monitor the process of itself, disrupting rumination and elaboration cycles characteristic of disorders like depression. For instance, in (MBCT), this model targets the shift from an "autobiographical self" entangled in negative schemas to a decentered that weakens the link between mood and automatic reactivity. Supporting evidence includes randomized controlled trials demonstrating that MBCT reduces relapse rates in recurrent depression by 31-50% over 12 months compared to treatment as usual, attributed to these metacognitive shifts rather than mere relaxation. However, critiques note that such models may overemphasize cognitive detachment, potentially overlooking individual differences in baseline attentional capacities, as meta-analyses indicate variable effects moderated by trait mindfulness levels. Behavioral models integrate mindfulness with principles of conditioning and formation, viewing it as a practice that cultivates present-moment responsiveness to reduce avoidance behaviors and enhance adaptive action. Key mechanisms include attentional deployment to sensory cues, which interrupts habitual responding, and response modulation via , akin to exposure paradigms in behavioral . In this view, repeated mindfulness strengthens over prepotent responses, as evidenced by improved performance on behavioral tasks like the Stroop following 8-week training programs, with effect sizes around d=0.4-0.6. Integrated cognitive-behavioral approaches, such as those in third-wave therapies, these models by combining mindfulness with , showing equivalent efficacy to traditional CBT for depression but with stronger effects on emotional regulation (e.g., reduced experiential avoidance). Limitations include the challenge of isolating behavioral from cognitive components, as most studies confound them in composite interventions.

Neurobiological Frameworks

Neurobiological frameworks of mindfulness emphasize changes in structure and function attributable to sustained attentional practices, often modeled through networks involved in attention, emotion regulation, and self-referential processing. Functional neuroimaging studies consistently demonstrate reduced activity and connectivity within the (DMN)—comprising regions such as the and medial —during , correlating with diminished and rumination. This deactivation is posited to underpin mindfulness's capacity for present-moment awareness, as DMN hyperactivity is linked to maladaptive self-focused thought patterns in conditions like depression. Concomitant enhancements occur in the (SN), including the anterior insula and , which detect and orient to internal states, and the central executive network (CEN), involving , supporting sustained attention and cognitive control. These shifts reflect a framework of top-down regulation, where prefrontal regions exert over limbic areas like the , reducing reactivity to emotional stimuli—a mechanism evidenced in fMRI tasks showing attenuated responses post-mindfulness training. This reduction in amygdala activity contributes to building long-term resilience by enhancing emotion regulation and facilitating a mental reset from stress responses, as indicated by neuroplastic changes in affective processing. Such patterns align with causal models of , where repeated practice strengthens fronto-limbic connectivity, fostering adaptive emotion regulation without reliance on suppression. Structural correlates include reports of increased gray matter density in the , anterior cingulate, and hippocampus following intensive mindfulness interventions, potentially reflecting dendritic arborization or . A 2023 meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials confirmed small but significant volumetric increases in these regions after mindfulness-based programs, though effect sizes varied by practice duration and participant baseline. integrity in tracts like the also improves with long-term , suggesting enhanced interhemispheric communication. However, methodological limitations persist: a 2022 preregistered RCT of 1,300 participants found no detectable structural changes from an 8-week (MBSR) course using high-resolution MRI, attributing prior positive findings to small samples, expectancy effects, or suboptimal imaging protocols. These frameworks integrate via self-regulation models, positing mindfulness as modulating interoceptive through insula-prefrontal loops, which in turn downregulates autonomic stress responses via hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis modulation. Electrophysiological data, including EEG studies, further support increased and alpha power during , indicative of relaxed alertness and reduced cortical . Despite convergent evidence from diverse modalities, remains tentative due to correlational designs and potential confounds like or factors in cross-sectional meditator studies; longitudinal RCTs with active controls are essential for disentangling practice-specific effects from nonspecific relaxation.

Integrative Approaches to Self-Regulation

Integrative approaches to self-regulation in mindfulness involve combining mindfulness practices with complementary techniques such as cognitive-behavioral strategies, emotion regulation training, and behavioral reinforcement to enhance , meta-awareness, and adaptive responding to internal states. These methods address limitations of standalone mindfulness by incorporating structured and habit formation, thereby fostering sustained self-regulatory improvements in areas like emotion management, health behavior change, and impulse control. Mindfulness techniques such as urge surfing, which entail non-judgmental observation of transient urges to diminish reactivity, have demonstrated associations with reduced compulsive behaviors, including compulsive sexual behavior, in clinical populations. For instance, mindfulness practices paired with self-regulation interventions have demonstrated efficacy in reducing behaviors among older adults, with a 2024 showing significant gains in self-regulation scores post-intervention compared to controls. A prominent example is (MBCT), which merges mindfulness meditation with (CBT) elements to target rumination and emotional reactivity, key barriers to self-regulation. Developed in the late 1990s and formalized in clinical protocols by , MBCT trains participants in mindful of thoughts as transient events, integrated with CBT's cognitive defusion techniques, yielding meta-analytic of reduced depressive rates by 31-43% in at-risk populations through enhanced decentering and emotion regulation. Similarly, Mindfulness-integrated Cognitive Behavior Therapy (MiCBT) extends this by staging interventions: initial self-focused mindfulness for interoceptive , followed by exposure-based , and finally interpersonal applications, with empirical support from trials indicating superior outcomes in anxiety self-regulation over traditional CBT alone. Integration with (DBT) components, such as the STOP skill (Stop, Take a breath, Observe, Proceed), further bolsters mindfulness for acute self-regulation by embedding non-judgmental observation within distress tolerance protocols, as evidenced in clinical adaptations where participants reported 20-30% reductions in impulsive reactions via combined mindfulness and behavioral chaining. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying these integrations include strengthened activation for executive control alongside amygdala downregulation for emotional stability, per fMRI studies of hybrid protocols. However, efficacy varies by dosage and population, with an 8-week mindfulness regimen outperforming shorter exposures in facilitating chronic disease self-management behaviors, underscoring the need for tailored integration to avoid dilution of effects. Meta-analyses confirm moderate effect sizes (d=0.4-0.6) for emotion regulation in integrative mindfulness versus isolated practice, though long-term adherence remains a moderator influenced by individual baseline .

Applications and Empirical Outcomes

Clinical and Therapeutic Uses

(MBSR), an 8-week structured program developed by in 1979 at the Medical Center, integrates mindfulness and to address and stress-related conditions. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate MBSR moderately reduces symptoms of anxiety, depression, and distress in clinical populations, with effect sizes around 0.3-0.5 for these outcomes. In a 2014 RCT involving 36 adults with anxiety disorders, MBSR demonstrated noninferiority to (a ), with comparable reductions in anxiety scores on the of Severity scale after 8 weeks. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), adapted from MBSR and by Zindel Segal, Mark Williams, and John Teasdale in the late 1990s, targets relapse prevention in . A 2004 RCT with 77 participants recovered from recurrent depression found MBCT reduced rates over 12 months to 47% versus 73% in treatment-as-usual controls, particularly effective for those with three or more prior episodes. Subsequent meta-analyses of nine trials (n=1,258) confirm MBCT halves risk when added to usual care, with hazard ratios of 0.5-0.7, though effects are less pronounced against active maintenance antidepressants. In management, shows small but consistent benefits, with a 2016 of 30 RCTs reporting a standardized mean difference of -0.33 in intensity compared to controls, alongside improvements in pain acceptance and emotional coping. For anxiety disorders, a 2014 of programs, including mindfulness variants, found moderate evidence of reduced anxiety ( 0.38 at 8 weeks), sustained at 3-6 months follow-up. Applications extend to substance use disorders and , where meta-analyses indicate adjunctive mindfulness interventions alleviate cravings and negative symptoms, though evidence quality varies and long-term superiority over established therapies remains unproven. Overall, a 2021 comprehensive review of mindfulness-based interventions across psychiatric disorders synthesizes moderate efficacy for depression, anxiety, and stress reduction, with biopsychosocial benefits including lowered and improved , but emphasizes the need for larger RCTs to address heterogeneity in participant adherence and outcome measures. While effective as an adjunct, mindfulness therapies do not consistently outperform gold-standard treatments like or in head-to-head comparisons, and effects may partly stem from nonspecific factors such as expectation and group support.

Non-Clinical Domains (Education, Business, Military)

In educational settings, programs aim to foster , emotional regulation, and stress resilience among students and educators. A 2014 systematic review and of 15 studies involving over 1,800 children and adolescents concluded that school-based mindfulness interventions yielded small to moderate improvements in cognitive performance, such as executive function, and resilience to stress, though effects on anxiety and depression were inconsistent. More recent meta-analytic evidence from 2022, synthesizing 37 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), demonstrated that mindfulness-based programs enhance students' school adjustment, including reduced behavioral problems and improved academic engagement, with effect sizes ranging from small (d=0.20) to moderate (d=0.45). A 2025 of 28 school-based interventions further confirmed positive influences on diverse student outcomes, including and self-regulation, but highlighted variability due to program duration and fidelity, with longer interventions (over 8 weeks) showing stronger results. Despite these findings, critiques note potential overreliance on self-report measures and limited long-term follow-up data, underscoring the need for rigorous replication. Workplace mindfulness training in business contexts targets employee stress reduction, , and retention amid high-pressure environments. A 2020 meta-analysis of 23 RCTs with 1,373 participants found that mindfulness-based programs significantly decreased stress (Hedges' g=0.44), burnout (g=0.32), and (g=0.34), while also alleviating somatic complaints, with effects persisting at 3-6 month follow-ups in some studies. An RCT involving 198 employees in a workplace mindfulness training program reported reductions in perceived stress and improvements in mindfulness facets like observing and non-reactivity post-intervention, alongside better sleep quality at 6-month follow-up compared to controls. A 2023 and of 34 RCTs affirmed these benefits for occupational outcomes, including lower , but noted moderator effects such as higher baseline stress amplifying gains and shorter programs (under 8 hours) yielding weaker results. Empirical data suggest mechanisms involve enhanced present-moment awareness mitigating rumination, though industry-specific adaptations (e.g., for tech firms) remain underexplored. Military applications of mindfulness emphasize building resilience against operational stressors, including combat exposure and (PTSD). The U.S. Army's Mindfulness-Based Mind Fitness Training (MMFT), piloted since 2008, integrates brief daily practices to improve attention and stress recovery; a 2011 RCT with 31 high-stress pre-deployment soldiers showed MMFT enhanced and mood under duress compared to controls, without increasing dissociation risks. A 2021 meta-analysis of 8 RCTs on military-related PTSD found mindfulness reduced symptoms (standardized mean difference=-0.68) relative to waitlist controls, particularly in active-duty personnel, though effects were moderated by session frequency. Recent evidence from 2025 reviews indicates mindfulness training bolsters resilience metrics like emotional stability pre-deployment, with showing strengthened activity for threat regulation, but results for PTSD symptom alleviation are mixed, with some studies reporting no significant changes despite resilience gains. Programs like these, implemented in units such as the U.S. Marine Corps, prioritize causal links to performance under fatigue, yet require caution for populations with acute trauma histories due to potential re-experiencing triggers.

Recent Digital and Scalable Interventions

Mindfulness in the digital age has proliferated through digital interventions, including mobile apps and online programs, leveraging smartphones and for scalable delivery without requiring in-person facilitation. These tools typically adapt core mindfulness practices—such as guided , body scans, and —into short, self-paced sessions, enabling widespread dissemination to populations underserved by traditional group-based mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs). A 2021 of online MBIs reported moderate effect sizes in reducing depression (Hedges' g = 0.37), anxiety (g = 0.30), and stress (g = 0.44), with benefits persisting in diverse settings like workplaces and universities. Prominent commercial apps like Headspace and Calm have undergone randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating acute reductions in psychological distress. For instance, a 2025 RCT using Headspace found that 10-minute daily sessions over four weeks significantly lowered subjective stress and improved stressor appraisals in novice meditators compared to controls, though effects were small (Cohen's d ≈ 0.3). Similarly, a 2019 RCT of Calm among students reported significant decreases in perceived stress (p < 0.001) and increases in mindfulness and self-compassion after eight weeks, with high user engagement in guided audio modules. An updated 2024 meta-analysis of app-based interventions confirmed small but significant effects on depression and anxiety symptoms (g = 0.28–0.35), particularly when usage exceeded 10 minutes daily, though outcomes were less robust against active controls like exercise. Scalable online adaptations of structured protocols, such as mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), have shown promise in clinical populations. A 2023 meta-analysis of e-health MBCT trials indicated superior anxiety and depression reductions versus waitlist controls (g > 0.5), with videoconferencing formats maintaining fidelity to in-person efficacy during the COVID-19 pandemic. For prenatal insomnia, a 2025 digital MBI trial reported improved sleep quality and reduced depressive symptoms (effect size d = 0.62) via app-delivered modules, highlighting scalability for remote maternal health support. Virtual reality (VR)-enhanced mindfulness, an emerging modality, integrates immersive environments for attention training; a 2025 systematic review protocol anticipates synthesizing RCTs to quantify mental health gains, with preliminary studies suggesting enhanced engagement over 2D apps. Despite scalability advantages—evidenced by apps reaching millions, with Headspace and Calm comprising 96% of daily app users in 2023—challenges include high attrition (23–28% in RCTs) and variable adherence, often mitigated by or reminders but not fully resolved. These interventions complement, rather than replace, face-to-face MBIs, with evidence strongest for short-term symptom relief in non-clinical samples.

Scientific Research on Effects

Efficacy in Meta-Analyses and RCTs

Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), such as (MBSR) and (MBCT), indicate small to moderate effect sizes for reducing psychological distress, with standardized mean differences typically ranging from d = 0.21 for to d = 0.55 for psychiatric symptoms. Mindfulness practice correlates with increased subjective happiness and improved emotional regulation, with empirical studies showing higher trait mindfulness associated with greater happiness alongside reduced anxiety and depression. These effects are observed across diverse populations, including clinical and non-clinical groups, but exhibit high heterogeneity, suggesting variability in outcomes influenced by factors like intervention duration, participant characteristics, and control conditions. For instance, a 2023 individual participant data of MBPs found average reductions in distress compared to no intervention, though benefits were not universal and diminished against active controls. In mental health applications, MBIs demonstrate modest efficacy for anxiety and depression, including reductions in worry and low mood, with medium effect sizes in meta-analyses for anxiety, depression, and stress. A comprehensive review of over 200 studies reported small improvements in anxiety (g ≈ 0.3–0.4) and depression symptoms, particularly when compared to passive controls, with moderate evidence for stress and pain reduction, the latter including chronic pain through altered brain signal processing. MBCT is effective for preventing depressive relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder. MBIs can match the effectiveness of medications like escitalopram for some anxiety disorders. Recent meta-analyses corroborate this: for depressive symptoms in pregnant individuals, mindfulness meditation yielded significant reductions (Hedges' g = 0.45), recommending its adjunctive use. Similarly, in coronary artery disease patients, MBIs reduced anxiety (SMD = -0.62), depression (SMD = -0.58), and stress (SMD = -0.51), based on 14 RCTs. Stand-alone mindfulness exercises, without broader therapeutic packages, also showed positive effects on anxiety and depression in general populations (d ≈ 0.3–0.5). However, effects often shrink or nullify against active comparators like cognitive behavioral therapy, and laboratory studies on emotion regulation report small effects (d ≈ 0.2) that vanish after outlier removal, highlighting potential overestimation. MBIs also enhance psychological flexibility, aiding change and emotion management, alongside improvements in concentration, working memory, sleep, fatigue, and executive functions like planning and impulse control, with meta-analyses showing small to moderate effects (d ≈ 0.2–0.4). For stress-related outcomes, meta-analyses consistently find small reductions, such as in university students (g = 0.24 for depression symptoms via apps across 45 RCTs) and general populations via internet-based MBIs (SMD ≈ 0.3 for stress), along with lowered burnout risk and improved sleep quality. In , effects on socioemotional skills are small (d ≈ 0.2), with no significant academic gains. reductions are noted (SMD = -0.51), but publication bias risks inflating estimates, as funnel plot asymmetry and Egger's tests indicate in multiple reviews. Overall, while RCTs support targeted benefits, methodological concerns—including reliance on self-reports, short-term follow-ups, and infrequent blinding—limit causal claims, with GRADE assessments often rating evidence as low to moderate due to inconsistency and risk of bias.

Neurological and Physiological Findings

Neuroimaging studies using (fMRI) have demonstrated that mindfulness meditation practices, such as those in (MBSR) programs, are associated with altered activation in networks involved in and . Specifically, practitioners exhibit decreased activity in the (DMN), which is linked to and self-referential thinking, and increased engagement in salience and executive control networks during meditation tasks. (EEG) research further indicates enhanced alpha and power during mindfulness practice compared to rest states, suggesting improved attentional focus and relaxation responses, though these effects vary by meditation experience level. Structural neuroimaging meta-analyses of mindfulness-based interventions reveal modest gray matter increases in regions like the (ACC), insula, and hippocampus following 8-week programs, potentially reflecting related to sustained and interoceptive awareness, thereby increasing brain plasticity. However, randomized controlled trials specifically examining MBSR have failed to detect significant structural brain changes, attributing prior positive findings to methodological confounds such as self-selection bias or inadequate controls. These inconsistencies highlight the need for larger, blinded studies to disentangle practice-induced adaptations from baseline differences in meditators. Physiologically, mindfulness interventions have been linked to reductions in salivary levels and blood pressure, markers of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity and cardiovascular health, particularly in high-stress and hypertensive populations, with meta-analyses showing small to moderate effects. (HRV), an indicator of balance, increases with regular practice, correlating with better emotional regulation and reduced sympathetic dominance. Evidence for boosted immune function includes lowered pro-inflammatory cytokines like interleukin-6 and positive effects on markers of inflammation and cell-mediated immunity, though these findings are preliminary and mixed, with some lacking replication in broader meta-analyses. Overall, these physiological shifts appear dose-dependent, emerging after consistent practice over weeks to months, though remains inferred from correlational designs rather than direct mechanistic tests.

Moderators and Predictors of Outcomes

Lower baseline trait mindfulness predicts greater improvements in outcomes following mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), with a small (B = −0.14, 95% CI [−0.21, −0.06]). This moderation holds across 177 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 13,486 participants, where individuals with lower dispositional mindfulness at baseline showed larger reductions in symptoms compared to those with higher baseline levels. Similarly, lower baseline trait mindfulness is associated with larger increases in post-intervention trait mindfulness itself (B = −0.09, 95% CI [−0.16, −0.02]). However, an individual participant data (IPD) of 13 RCTs found no significant by baseline dispositional mindfulness on psychological distress reduction, highlighting inconsistencies across study designs. Higher baseline , including depression severity, predicts worsened outcomes in interventions, based on a of 51 studies with 7,782 participants (r = .21 for psychopathology, r = .22 for depression). In contrast, some evidence suggests higher baseline depression or anxiety enhances adaptation and efficacy in specific contexts, such as mindfulness-based prevention. Baseline (r = .23) and interpersonal variables (r = .17) positively predict improved outcomes, while demographics like age, gender, and education show no consistent moderation effects. Dosage of practice serves as a key predictor, with linear dose-response relationships observed in prospective studies, and effects emerging after consistent daily practice as short as 10 minutes. Frequency of meditation sessions exerts a stronger influence than session duration (approximately 2.5 times greater impact), with thresholds of 35–65 minutes daily for gains and 50–80 minutes for reduced distress. Benefits from self-directed practice accumulate over time and persist in follow-ups spanning 2–4 years, particularly among less experienced practitioners. These patterns underscore adherence and engagement as proximal predictors of efficacy across MBIs.

Adverse Effects and Limitations

Prevalence and Types of Negative Outcomes

A of over 1,200 regular meditators across 11 English-speaking countries found that 53% reported at least one meditation-related lasting at least one month, with 37% describing these as moderately or severely unpleasant or difficult. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials and observational studies on meditation-based therapies report lower pooled prevalences of 8.3% (95% CI 4.6-12.0%) for any adverse events, though rates escalate to 25.6% in retreat-based or intensive practices. Population-based surveys indicate meditation-related harms in under 10% of practitioners, aligning with rates observed in other psychological treatments like . These discrepancies arise from differences in definitions (e.g., transient distress versus lasting impairment), self-reporting biases, and under-detection in clinical trials, where harms are often not systematically assessed. The most frequently reported negative outcomes include anxiety (prevalent in 33% of adverse event cases), depression (27%), and cognitive or perceptual disturbances such as dissociation or depersonalization (25%). Other common types encompass emotional dysregulation, including heightened negative affect or re-experiencing of trauma; somatic symptoms like pain or gastrointestinal issues; and interpersonal difficulties, such as strained relationships due to altered emotional processing. Severe outcomes, occurring in 1-7% of affected individuals, involve psychosis, mania, suicidal ideation, or profound threats to reality testing, sometimes necessitating hospitalization or discontinuation of practice. Lasting negative effects, defined as persisting beyond one month and impairing daily functioning, affect 6-14% of meditators in clinical samples, often linked to dysregulated patterns like hyperarousal or hypoarousal. While many experiences are transient and resolve without intervention, akin to side effects in , retrospective accounts highlight underappreciated risks in non-clinical settings, where supportive resources may be absent. Empirical data underscore that harms are not negligible, particularly in intensive protocols, challenging assumptions of universal safety in mindfulness dissemination.

Risk Factors and Vulnerable Groups

Individuals with pre-existing conditions, particularly histories of trauma or (PTSD), face elevated risks of adverse effects from mindfulness meditation, including intensified distress, traumatic re-experiencing, and dissociation. Studies indicate that actively depressed patients with childhood abuse histories and PTSD symptoms are significantly less likely to benefit from (MBCT) and may experience heightened distress during practice. For instance, trauma-sensitive modifications, such as shorter sessions and grounding techniques, are recommended to mitigate these risks, as standard practices can trigger in this group. Those predisposed to or with a history of psychotic episodes represent another vulnerable population, where intensive has been linked to symptom exacerbation, including hallucinations, depersonalization, and in case reports. Prolonged or concentrative practices appear more prone to inducing such outcomes than brief, mindfulness-based interventions, though is confounded by factors like and untreated psychiatric conditions. Empirical evidence from case studies documents onset in previously stable individuals following extended retreats, underscoring the need for screening and adaptations like reduced duration for at-risk participants. Additional risk factors include participation in intensive retreats, which correlate with higher incidence of adverse events compared to shorter, structured programs like (MBSR). Pre-existing dissociation or high trait anxiety may predict lasting impairments, with one study of 96 participants finding dissociation associated with functional declines persisting over a month in 6% of cases. Overall prevalence of meditation-related adverse effects ranges from 25% to 87%, with 3% to 37% reporting functional impairment, though many events are transient and not definitively caused by mindfulness itself. Screening for and avoiding unsupervised intensive practice are advised to minimize harms in these groups.

Empirical Evidence on Harm Mechanisms

Empirical investigations into the mechanisms underlying adverse effects of mindfulness meditation have primarily focused on dysregulation of systems, heightened perceptual sensitivity, and disruptions in emotional processing, drawing from surveys, qualitative reports, and physiological assessments of practitioners. A key mechanism involves dysregulated , where practices emphasizing sustained or body awareness can trigger hyperarousal states, manifesting as anxiety, , or perceptual , or hypoarousal leading to dissociation and emotional numbing; in one analysis of mindfulness-based program participants, lasting negative outcomes affected 6-14% of the sample and correlated strongly with these dysregulation markers. This pattern aligns with (ANS) perturbations observed in experimental settings, such as irregular or sympathetic overactivation during breath-focused , which elicited symptoms like , , and hot flushes in 17% of participants in a study of Ānāpāna practice. Another documented pathway is amplified interoceptive , where non-judgmental observation instructions inadvertently intensify pre-existing vulnerabilities, such as in individuals with trauma histories, leading to emotional flooding or re-traumatization without sufficient regulatory support. from regular meditators indicate that this mechanism contributes to unpleasant effects like intensified anxiety or depersonalization, particularly when practices disrupt habitual avoidance strategies, with prevalence tied to dosage and individual predispositions like childhood adversity. Qualitative and phenomenological accounts from long-term practitioners further reveal perceptual distortions—such as altered sense of or —as stemming from deconstructive techniques that weaken ego boundaries, empirically linked to cognitive anomalies in 25% of reports across meditation-based therapies. Neurological underpinnings, though preliminary, suggest involvement of altered activity or salience processing, where mindfulness-induced changes in executive function impair threat detection modulation, exacerbating rage or hypersensitivity in susceptible users; these effects were noted in neuroimaging-informed reviews of meditation's dual impacts on regulation. Longitudinal tracking in clinical samples underscores that such mechanisms are dose-dependent and context-specific, with intensive retreats amplifying risks via prolonged exposure without therapeutic safeguards, contrasting transient effects in structured programs. Overall, these findings, derived from peer-reviewed cohorts rather than anecdotal reports, highlight causal pathways rooted in mismatched practice intensity and practitioner resilience, informing calls for screening in interventions.

Criticisms and Broader Debates

Methodological and Evidentiary Shortcomings

Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mindfulness interventions suffer from small sample sizes, often ranging from 20 to 50 participants per arm, which limits statistical power and increases the risk of Type I errors. This issue is compounded by frequent use of waitlist or no-treatment control groups rather than active comparators, such as or exercise, leading to inflated effect sizes that may reflect nonspecific factors like expectation rather than mindfulness-specific mechanisms. Blinding is particularly challenging in behavioral interventions, with many studies failing to implement adequate participant or assessor blinding, introducing performance and detection biases. Heterogeneity in intervention protocols further undermines comparability across studies; mindfulness-based programs vary widely in duration (from single sessions to eight-week courses), content (e.g., meditation types, guided vs. unguided), and fidelity checks, making meta-analytic synthesis unreliable without subgroup analyses that often reveal null effects in rigorous subsets. Reliance on self-report measures, such as the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, introduces response biases, including demand characteristics where participants aware of study hypotheses report greater improvements, while objective outcomes like physiological markers show weaker or inconsistent associations. Conceptual ambiguity persists, as "mindfulness" lacks a standardized aligned with traditional Buddhist constructs like sammā-sati, resulting in measures that capture trait-like dispositions rather than intervention-induced states, complicating . Publication bias is evident in the field, with 87% of 124 published mindfulness RCTs reporting at least one positive abstract outcome and 88% concluding efficacy, despite many meta-analyses (70.5% of 44 reviewed) omitting formal tests for bias, such as Egger's test or funnel plots. This skew is highlighted by trim-and-fill analyses in some reviews, which suggest underestimation of null effects, particularly for mindfulness facets. Replication efforts have faltered amid the broader psychological science crisis; for instance, self-reported mindfulness enhancements as a mediator of intervention outcomes have not replicated reliably, and meta-analyses of EEG markers for error processing yield weak evidence (Hedges' g ≈ 0.2, non-significant). Long-term follow-up data remain scarce, with most trials assessing outcomes at post-intervention only (e.g., 8 weeks), where effects decay rapidly without maintenance, and few studies (less than 10% in systematic reviews) track beyond six months, obscuring durability claims. Structural meta-analyses have failed to confirm early reports of gray matter changes post-mindfulness training, attributing prior findings to methodological artifacts like cross-sectional designs or uncorrected multiple comparisons. High attrition rates in digital mindfulness apps (up to 70% in RCTs) further erode evidentiary strength, as intention-to-treat analyses often mask engagement disparities that correlate with outcomes. These shortcomings, prevalent despite growing publication volume since 2000, underscore the need for preregistered, large-scale trials with active controls to substantiate causal claims beyond enthusiasm-driven narratives in academia.

Cultural Appropriation and Commercialization

Secular adaptations of mindfulness, originating from Buddhist meditative practices such as sati in traditions, gained prominence in the West through Jon Kabat-Zinn's development of (MBSR) in 1979 at the Medical Center, which deliberately decoupled the practice from its religious context to integrate it into clinical settings. This secularization facilitated its adoption in healthcare, education, and corporate environments, emphasizing present-moment awareness for stress reduction without requiring adherence to Buddhist precepts like the Eightfold Path. Critics, including Buddhist scholars and practitioners, have labeled this process as cultural appropriation, arguing that it extracts mindfulness from its ethical, philosophical, and communal Buddhist framework—encompassing wisdom (prajna) and moral conduct (sila)—reducing it to a decontextualized technique for personal productivity. Miles Neale, a Buddhist psychotherapist, coined "McMindfulness" in the early 2010s to describe this trend as a "feeding frenzy of spiritual practices" that prioritizes superficial calm over transformative insight, often ignoring historical Asian contributions and perpetuating invisibility of Buddhist origins in Western narratives. Similarly, Ronald Purser's 2019 analysis contends that secular mindfulness mystifies its Buddhist roots while aligning with individualistic ideologies, potentially exacerbating systemic inequities by framing suffering as personal failing rather than structural. Some Asian American and Buddhist commentators highlight how this rebranding contributes to erasure of Asian immigrant roles in introducing Buddhism to the West, amid broader patterns of religious marginalization. Commercialization has amplified these concerns, with the global meditation market—largely driven by mindfulness products—valued at $7.98 billion in 2024 and projected to reach $22.3 billion by 2029, fueled by apps like Headspace and Calm, corporate wellness programs, and celebrity endorsements. In the U.S., an estimated 36 million practitioners supported a $2.4 billion industry as of 2025, often marketed as tools for enhancing focus and resilience in high-stress capitalist environments. Detractors argue this commodification transforms mindfulness into a palliative for workplace exploitation, as seen in programs adopted by firms like and since the , which Purser describes as enabling "McMindfulness" by promoting adaptation to dysfunction rather than challenging root causes like inequality or . However, proponents counter that such adaptations reflect Buddhism's historical adaptability across cultures—from its spread from to —and that empirical evidence of benefits in secular forms, derived from randomized controlled trials, validates the practice independently of origin critiques, which often lack demonstration of tangible harm to source traditions. While academic and media sources advancing appropriation narratives may reflect ideological priorities over causal analysis of cultural exchange, the commercialization's scale underscores a demand driven by verifiable psychological outcomes rather than mere exploitation.

Philosophical and Ideological Critiques

Philosophical critiques of mindfulness often center on its implicit metaphysical commitments, which are frequently obscured in secular presentations. Proponents frame mindfulness as a neutral attentional practice, yet it presupposes Buddhist-influenced views such as anicca (impermanence) and anatta (no-self), positing that phenomena lack inherent stability or an enduring ego—a stance incompatible with Cartesian dualism or Aristotelian substance that underpin much Western thought. These assumptions, critics argue, impose a non-theistic cosmology on practitioners without acknowledgment, potentially undermining rationalist epistemologies that prioritize objective reality over subjective flux. Phenomenological philosophers, drawing on Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, further contend that mindfulness overemphasizes detached observation of internal states, neglecting the embodied, intersubjective constitution of experience. By reducing awareness to a solipsistic "here and now," it risks abstracting consciousness from its contextual, relational embeddedness, treating the lived body as mere object rather than co-constitutive of perception. Such critiques echo broader philosophical skepticism toward mindfulness's claim to universality, with figures like Thomas Nagel questioning whether its introspective focus yields genuine insight or merely reinforces a fragmented, presentist ontology detached from normative deliberation. Ideologically, mindfulness has been accused of fostering acquiescence to power structures, particularly under neoliberal regimes where it serves as a privatized balm for systemic stressors. Ronald Purser, in his analysis of "McMindfulness," describes it as a depoliticized commodity that redirects discontent inward, promoting resilience to exploitation rather than challenging labor or inequality—evident in its adoption by corporations like via programs such as "Search Inside Yourself" since 2007. This aligns with Foucault-inspired critiques viewing mindfulness as a of the that disciplines subjects into productive docility, eschewing collective praxis for individualized . From traditional Buddhist perspectives, secular mindfulness is faulted for excising ethical (sila) and wisdom (prajna) dimensions integral to sati in the Noble Eightfold Path, rendering it a truncated tool prone to ethical drift. Theravada scholars and practitioners warn that without precepts against harm, it can enable rationalization of moral lapses, as seen in reports of meditators experiencing heightened narcissism or detachment from compassion. Critics within Buddhist communities, including figures like Bhikkhu Bodhi, argue this secularization misappropriates vipassana for therapeutic ends, diluting its soteriological aim of liberation from samsara and inviting commodification that prioritizes market viability over doctrinal fidelity. These ideological tensions highlight mindfulness's role in broader cultural debates over authenticity, where academic and media sources—often steeped in progressive frameworks—amplify decontexualized adaptations while sidelining orthodox Buddhist reservations.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.