Hubbry Logo
Hate WeekHate WeekMain
Open search
Hate Week
Community hub
Hate Week
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hate Week
Hate Week
Hate Week
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), by George Orwell, Hate Week is a psychological operation designed to increase as much as possible the population's hatred of the current enemy of the totalitarian Party, whichever of the two opposing super-states that may be.

Plot summary

[edit]

During one particular Hate Week, Oceania switched allies while a public speaker is in the middle of a sentence, although the disruption was minimal: the posters against the previous enemy were deemed to be "sabotage" of Hate Week conducted by Emmanuel Goldstein and his supporters, summarily torn down by the crowd, and quickly replaced with propaganda against the new enemy, thus demonstrating the ease with which the Party directs the hatred of its members. This ease of direction could also be partially attributed to the similarity in the terms "Eastasia" and "Eurasia" because they are more easily confused. All citizens of Oceania are expected to show appropriate enthusiasm during Hate Week, as well as the daily Two Minutes Hate. While participation in this event is not legally required, avoiding or refusing to do so is said to make one appear suspicious to the Thought Police, generally resulting in the vaporisation (execution) of the perpetrator. This ensures that they are against the opposing party and still allied with Big Brother.[1][2]

Hate Week is celebrated in late summer. The events during that time include waxwork displays, military parades, speeches and lectures. New slogans are also coined and new songs are written. The theme of the Hate Week is called the Hate Song. It is mentioned that a unit from the Fiction Department was assigned to make atrocity pamphlets (falsified reports of atrocities committed by Oceania's enemies against her) designed to stimulate Oceania's populace further into enraged frenzy against all enemies. The aggregate effect of Hate Week thus is to excite the populace to such a point that they "would unquestionably have torn [captured enemy soldiers] to pieces" if given the opportunity.

Hate Week is introduced to the reader for the first time in the second paragraph of the first page of Nineteen Eighty-Four; however, at this point in time, readers have no idea what Hate Week is. "It was part of the economy drive in preparation for Hate Week."[3]

Cultural impact

[edit]

"Hate week" has been adopted by theorists and pundits as a comparison to real life efforts to demonise an enemy of the state.[citation needed] Soviet Literary theorist John Rodden notes that "Hate Week" depicted by George Orwell's 1984 novel anticipates some of the anti-American events in the Soviet Union that followed.[4] Scott Boulding argues similarities between the dystopian hate week and Stalinist efforts to supplant religion with devotional services to the state.[5]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hate Week

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Hate Week is a fictional annual event in George Orwell's dystopian novel (1949), during which the totalitarian Party governing incites its citizens into frenzied collective hatred against the regime's current foreign enemy through mass rallies, speeches, parades, and campaigns. The event underscores the Party's mechanisms of psychological control, including the extension of daily rituals like the into prolonged sessions of rage, all aimed at reinforcing loyalty to Big Brother and suppressing independent thought. Central to Hate Week's narrative significance is its illustration of and historical revisionism; midway through the proceedings, the Party abruptly switches Oceania's war enemy from to Eastasia, retroactively alters all records to match, and the assembled crowd seamlessly redirects its vitriol without , highlighting the malleability of public belief under . Preparations for the week involve resource and labor-intensive efforts, such as constructing oversized models of Big Brother, which exacerbate societal deprivation while channeling discontent outward. Orwell drew inspiration for such tactics from real-world totalitarian , including Nazi mass rallies, to depict how engineered sustains power by unifying the populace against fabricated threats.

Origins in Nineteen Eighty-Four

Fictional Description and Context

Hate Week is an annual event in the dystopian superstate of , as described in George Orwell's novel (published 1949), designed to foster collective rage against the regime's current foreign enemy. It involves orchestrated mass demonstrations, fervent oratory, and ubiquitous propaganda that permeates daily life, compelling citizens to participate in chants, parades, and public displays of animosity. The protagonist, Winston Smith, observes the fervor firsthand, noting how preparations disrupt normal routines, with workers laboring overtime to produce banners, posters, and effigies amid ration shortages and exhaustion. The event's context within Oceania's society underscores the Party's strategy of as a tool for internal control, where switching allegiances—such as from to Eastasia mid-week—forces retroactive . In the novel, this shift occurs during a climactic speech, with the speaker seamlessly altering the target of hatred while the crowd, conditioned by , accepts the contradiction without pause, erasing memories of the prior narrative. This mechanism highlights the regime's erasure of objective truth, as records are physically altered overnight to align with the new reality. Hate Week serves as a ritualistic outlet for suppressed frustrations, redirecting potential dissent toward external foes and reinforcing loyalty to Big Brother. Orwell portrays it as culminating in exhaustion rather than resolution, with the populace returning to drudgery afterward, their emotions exploited to sustain the Party's power without addressing underlying scarcities like reduced rations announced during the proceedings. This fictional construct illustrates the novel's broader exploration of totalitarian psychology, where manufactured enmity supplants individual agency.

Key Events During the Week

The preparations for Hate Week involved drastic increases in working hours, with Winston Smith and his colleagues in the Ministry of Truth laboring up to ninety hours in a single week to produce posters, pamphlets, and other materials decrying the enemy state of . These efforts included an "economy drive" that rationed resources like and elevated everyday activities, such as climbing stairs in blackout conditions, to build anticipation and fervor. Throughout the week, Oceania's cities pulsed with organized : processions marched through streets adorned with banners and effigies of the , loudspeaker trucks broadcast martial airs and atrocity stories, and crowds gathered for rallies where participants chanted slogans like "B-B! ... B-B!" in reference to Big Brother. Films depicting fabricated war crimes by Eurasian forces screened continuously, while waxworks and exhibits reinforced narratives of perpetual conflict, drawing in both members and proles amid the oppressive summer heat that amplified the rowdy atmosphere. On the sixth day, after exhaustive processions, speeches, shouting, singing, films, and the rhythmic stamping of boots, the massive rally reached its zenith when the principal orator—a lean, bony figure with a commanding voice—interrupted his tirade against to sip from a bottle passed by an attendant. Upon resuming, he altered his speech mid-sentence, declaring that had never been allied with Eastasia but always at war with it, redirecting the crowd's rage seamlessly to the new foe. The frenzied audience, without pause or contradiction, absorbed the shift, immediately tearing down posters of and hoisting those vilifying Eastasia, as if the prior enmity had evaporated.

Mechanisms of Propaganda and Control

Hate Week utilizes orchestrated mass events, including parades, displays, lectures, waxworks exhibits, screenings, and broadcasts, to incite unified hatred against the Party's designated enemies. These rituals extend the daily into prolonged sessions of chanting and fervor, reinforced by new slogans, the "Hate Song," and public loyalty demonstrations. Fabricated materials, such as atrocity pamphlets and falsified photographs, disseminate claims of enemy depravity, directing collective aggression toward figures like and foreign powers. Control is enforced through compulsory participation, with citizens facing increased labor demands—such as extended work hours for preparations—and financial impositions, exemplified by Winston Smith's deduction of two dollars for victory-themed decorations. The Inner Party sustains the highest levels of war hysteria during these events, ensuring ideological alignment across social strata. This structure diverts public focus from Oceania's internal scarcities and privations, channeling socioeconomic frustrations into external enmity to bolster Party authority. A core mechanism manifests in the abrupt mid-week reversal of the war enemy from to Eastasia on the sixth day, following processions and speeches, which the populace accepts seamlessly via —holding contradictory realities without . In one instance, an orator alters the speech's target mid-delivery, inciting the crowd to and obliterate banners bearing the prior enemy's name, illustrating the Party's dominion over historical and perceptual truth. Such manipulations preclude reflection on inconsistencies, perpetuating the regime's narrative monopoly and preempting dissent.

Thematic Analysis

Psychological and Social Functions

Hate Week serves as a psychological for the repressed frustrations of Oceania's citizens, who endure chronic shortages and , by directing their aggression toward a designated foreign , thereby providing a sanctioned outlet for rage that might otherwise destabilize the regime. This cathartic release, amplified through repetitive rituals like extended sessions and public oratory, binds individuals emotionally to the collective fervor, fostering a sense of purpose amid existential deprivation. Socially, the event reinforces in-group by unifying disparate classes—proles, members, and outer functionaries—in orchestrated displays of enmity, such as parades and hate chants, which obscure internal inequalities and sustain the fiction of perpetual warfare necessary for and hierarchical control. By escalating anti-enemy sentiment to , Hate Week entrenches the 's monopoly, preempting through manufactured communal ecstasy and vigilance. The mechanism exploits as the genesis of hate, weaponizing it to perpetuate psychological dependency on the for security and identity, while socially insulating the by diffusing potential energies into external . This dual function underscores the totalitarian strategy of transforming individual psyche into a tool of societal subjugation, where hate rituals not only vent but also regenerate the ideological fervor required for unbroken obedience.

Illustration of Doublethink and Historical Revisionism

During Hate Week in George Orwell's , the orchestrates a sudden reversal in 's wartime allegiances, shifting from war with (and alliance with Eastasia) to war with Eastasia (and alliance with ), which occurs midway through the week's frenzied rallies and propaganda events. This pivot is announced abruptly during a public demonstration, where the orator pauses mid-speech—after denouncing Eurasian treachery—to alter his rhetoric against Eastasia instead, prompting the assembled crowd to erupt in cheers without acknowledging the contradiction or prior narrative. The event underscores , defined in the novel as the capacity "to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to accept both B and not-B." Participants, including protagonist Winston Smith, instinctively suppress awareness of the switch, retroactively convincing themselves that had always been at war with Eastasia, thereby embodying the psychological mechanism that allows the to enforce fluid realities without resistance. The Hate Week reversal exemplifies 's role in sustaining totalitarian control by eroding individual memory and logic, as citizens discard evidence of the prior enemy configuration—such as weeks of anti-Eurasia slogans and materials—while embracing the new one as eternal truth. Orwell illustrates this through the crowd's unhesitating adaptation: no one questions the orator's seamless substitution of names, and the fervor intensifies rather than wanes, demonstrating how fuses conscious awareness of fabrication with unquestioning belief. Winston observes that the change propagates "everywhere at once," infiltrating private thoughts and public discourse instantaneously, which reinforces the Party's monopoly on reality by training the populace to perform mental acrobatics that prioritize loyalty over coherence. This process not only maintains as a unifying but also prevents by rendering historical inconsistencies psychologically inert. Complementing doublethink, historical revisionism during Hate Week involves the Ministry of Truth's exhaustive overnight efforts to expunge all traces of the former narrative from records, aligning past documentation with the revised present. Workers like Winston labor extended shifts—up to ninety hours—to rewrite newspapers, speeches, maps, and films, substituting "Eastasia" for "Eurasia" and destroying originals in the process, ensuring that within days, no public or private record contradicts the new orthodoxy. Orwell depicts this as a literal enactment of the Party slogan "Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past," where revisionism erases objective anchors, making collective memory a malleable tool of power. By the week's end, references to Eurasia as the enemy vanish entirely from accessible history, compelling inhabitants to accept the fabricated continuity as factual, thus illustrating how revisionism operationalizes doublethink on a societal scale to fabricate an immutable yet ever-shifting past.

Critiques of Totalitarian Manipulation

Hate Week in serves as a mechanism for the to orchestrate mass and redirect public toward fabricated external threats, thereby critiquing how totalitarian regimes exploit collective emotions to consolidate power and suppress . During , which spans seven days of rallies, chants, and processions, citizens are conditioned to channel frustrations into ritualized hatred against Oceania's designated enemy, initially , fostering a sense of unity under the Party's banner while diverting attention from domestic scarcities and . This manipulation underscores Orwell's observation that oppressive systems require perpetual enemies to justify control, as evidenced by the abrupt mid-rally shift to Eastasia as the foe, with the crowd seamlessly adopting the revised narrative without evidence or pause. The depiction critiques the psychological engineering inherent in , where events like Hate Week function as controlled , allowing the populace to vent existential without targeting the regime itself. Orwell illustrates this through the Two Minutes Hate's extension into a week-long frenzy, where telescreens and orators amplify aggression via repetitive slogans and imagery, training individuals to equate personal discontent with loyalty to Big Brother. Such tactics, drawn from Orwell's analysis of real-world , reveal how regimes erode by associating emotional release with ideological , preventing the formation of alternative alliances or rebellions. A core critique lies in Hate Week's embodiment of , where participants hold contradictory beliefs—such as Oceania's shifting allies—without , highlighting totalitarianism's assault on objective reality. In the novel, the orator's speech alters mid-sentence, yet the audience rewrites its memories en masse, erasing records of prior enmity; this process critiques how apparatuses, like the Ministry of Truth, fabricate to align with state needs, rendering truth malleable and individual autonomy illusory. Orwell, informed by Stalinist show trials and Nazi mass rallies, warns that such manipulation thrives on linguistic control and enforced ignorance, as citizens internalize the Party's version of events to avoid . Critics interpreting Orwell's work emphasize that Hate Week exposes the causal link between manufactured crises and longevity: by sustaining , the averts economic accountability and internal scrutiny, a pattern Orwell traced to Soviet purges where scapegoats were swapped to maintain elite cohesion. This manipulation's efficacy relies on preemptive demoralization, where constant fear and ritual obedience condition subjects to accept absurdity, as seen in the crowd's fervor persisting despite the enemy switch, critiquing totalitarianism's capacity to reprogram faster than rational inquiry can intervene.

Historical and Real-World Inspirations

Orwell's Influences from Totalitarian Regimes

George Orwell's conception of Hate Week in was informed by the mass mobilization tactics of hatred observed in Stalin's and Hitler's , where regimes engineered periodic frenzies to reinforce loyalty and divert discontent. In the USSR, the of 1936–1938 exemplified this through show trials and public campaigns against "enemies of the people," such as the fabricated confessions in the case, which erased historical records and incited widespread denunciations to sustain paranoia and unity against perceived traitors. These events mirrored Hate Week's orchestrated uproar, processions, and erasure of inconvenient facts, extending daily rituals like the into a prolonged spectacle of collective rage. Orwell drew parallels to Soviet propaganda reversals, notably the abrupt shift after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact on August 23, 1939, which allied the USSR with against Western powers, only for the regime to pivot to anti-fascist hysteria following on June 22, 1941; such changes required rewriting alliances and vilifying former partners, akin to Oceania's mid-Hate Week switch from to Eastasia. The demonization of figures like , exiled in 1929 and retroactively branded a saboteur in show trials from 1936 onward, prefigured the scapegoating of as an eternal internal foe. Nazi influences included Adolf Hitler's emphasis in Mein Kampf (1925) on propaganda's role in fixating public hatred on a singular enemy to erode rational thought and foster mass hysteria, as seen in from 1933 that unified crowds through choreographed displays of fervor against and . This focus on a monolithic , evoking instinctive loathing without , echoed Hate Week's amplification of Goldstein's image to channel aggression, with the serving as a microcosm of Hitler's "mass suggestion" techniques that suppressed individual will amid communal ecstasy. Orwell's direct encounters amplified these observations: during the in 1937, he witnessed Stalinist suppression of the militia as "Trotskyist" traitors despite their anti-fascist efforts, revealing how fabricated internal enemies justified purges and historical revisionism—dynamics central to Hate Week's function in perpetuating the Party's narrative of and vigilance. Soviet Five-Year Plan propaganda, claiming impossible feats like fulfilling quotas early (e.g., the 1931 "" slogan), further informed the novel's portrayal of falsified triumphs amid Hate Week's deprivations.

Parallels to 20th-Century Propaganda Events

Hate Week's orchestration of mass rallies, frenzied speeches, and collective outpourings of enmity against a designated foe mirrors the propaganda spectacles employed by 20th-century totalitarian regimes to bind populations through manufactured antagonism. In , outlined in (1925) the efficacy of large-scale assemblies for stirring emotions over reason, advocating repetitive rituals to instill blind devotion and hatred toward internal and external threats; Orwell explicitly drew on these principles to depict Hate Week as a mechanism of psychological mobilization in a dystopian state. The annual Nuremberg Party Rallies (1933–1938) exemplified this approach, transforming political gatherings into theatrical displays of unity and aggression, with choreographed parades, bonfires, and Hitler's orations directing crowd passion against , Versailles Treaty signatories, and to consolidate National Socialist power. These events, which Hitler described as essential for converting skepticism into fanaticism via spectacle, parallel the novel's portrayal of escalating hatred culminating in public executions and rewritten narratives during the week. In the , Stalin's regime similarly harnessed rallies and public campaigns in to channel societal energies into denunciations of "enemies of the people," as seen in the (1936–1938), where show trials broadcast via newspapers and gatherings served as propaganda theaters for confessions, vilifications, and mass hysteria against Trotskyists, kulaks, and alleged saboteurs. Party-sponsored events like parades reinforced leader worship and anti-capitalist fervor through synchronized marches and slogans, functioning to supplant individual dissent with obligatory communal rage, much as Hate Week enforces amid shifting alliances. A distinctive feature of Hate Week—the abrupt mid-event switch from hating to Eastasia, followed by historical retrofitting—evokes realignments in Stalinist , such as the 1939 Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which necessitated rapid vilification of former anti-fascist targets while suppressing prior narratives of Nazi enmity, demonstrating how regimes adapt enmity to geopolitical expediency without disrupting public fervor.

Cultural Impact and Modern References

Literary and Media Adaptations

In Michael Radford's 1984 film adaptation, starring as Winston Smith, Hate Week is depicted via a climactic rally sequence that captures the orchestrated mass hysteria, with crowds chanting against the shifting enemy while propaganda shifts alliances mid-event, mirroring the novel's sudden switch from to Eastasia. This scene, filmed in 1983 and released in 1984, underscores the regime's fluid historical revisionism, as evidenced by the audible announcements of betrayal and the immediate redirection of rage. The 1954 BBC television production, directed by Rudolph Cartier and adapted by Nigel Kneale, incorporates Hate Week preparations as transitional sequences that build tension through repetitive propaganda drills, allowing for practical staging constraints like set changes while emphasizing the event's role in sustaining public fervor. Aired on November 12, 1954, this version integrates the week's rallies to highlight the psychological conditioning, drawing viewer complaints for its stark portrayal of totalitarian rituals but praised for fidelity to Orwell's themes of manipulated emotion. Stage adaptations often amplify Hate Week's communal intensity for theatrical effect. In the 2017 Broadway production at the Hudson Theatre, directed by Tim van Dammen, the event features Winston's defiant scream of "Down with Big Brother!" amid collective chanting, heightening the dramatic irony of enforced unity. Similarly, Matthew Dunster's 2010 adaptation at the Royal Exchange Theatre in portrayed Hate Week celebrations as "horribly jolly," using upbeat music and synchronized outbursts to evoke the festivity of propaganda-fueled . These renditions, typically condensed for runtime, retain the core mechanism of channeling existential rage into state loyalty, as seen in sound designs incorporating frenetic metal scores for rally scenes in various regional productions.

Usage in Contemporary Politics and Culture

In political commentary, "Hate Week" from Orwell's has been invoked to describe periods of manufactured public outrage and division during U.S. election cycles, where media and partisan actors amplify enmity toward opponents to consolidate support. For instance, during the 2020 presidential election, analysts characterized the intense, delirium-like surrounding candidates as akin to Hate Week's orchestrated , citing examples of synchronized media denunciations and public fervor that mirrored the novel's depiction of unifying the populace through collective animosity. More recently, in analyses of the post-2024 political landscape under the second Trump administration, the concept has been applied to events fostering via abrupt policy shifts or symbolic declarations, such as executive actions on February 9, 2025, which some observers likened to the Party's arbitrary holidays designed to stoke through vilification of perceived enemies. Similarly, a March 2025 New York Times examination of parallels highlighted Hate Week's enemy-switching mechanism—where abruptly realigns alliances mid-festivities—as reflective of fluid geopolitical narratives in contemporary U.S. debates, though critics of such analogies argue they overlook the novel's emphasis on totalitarian permanence over democratic volatility. In broader cultural discourse, "Hate Week" symbolizes perpetual polarization in social media-driven cycles, with commentators in late describing ongoing partisan conflicts as an "ever-lasting session" of such engineered , diverting attention from failures. This usage extends to critiques of identity-based conflicts, where events like the November escalation of incidents were framed by some as surpassing Orwell's fiction in scale, prompting calls for examining causal factors like eroded social trust rather than mere rhetorical excess. Outside the U.S., Russian interpretations during the 2022-2023 conflict repurposed Hate Week imagery in to deflect Orwell's warnings, portraying Western actions as the true manipulation, underscoring the term's adaptability in defenses. These invocations, often from conservative or libertarian outlets wary of institutional narratives, highlight toward mainstream framings that downplay elite orchestration of division.

Debates on Prescience and Misapplications

Scholars and commentators have debated the prescience of Orwell's depiction of Hate Week, an annual event in designed to mobilize mass hatred against the Party's designated enemies through parades, speeches, and , culminating in a sudden revision of historical enemies mid-event—from to Eastasia—without dissent from the crowd. This mechanism, intended to foster unity via perpetual enmity and suppress individual thought, is seen by some as prophetic of 20th- and 21st-century techniques where regimes or influential media abruptly shift narratives to maintain control, such as wartime alliance reversals or domestic campaigns. For instance, the seamless crowd acceptance of the enemy switch during Hate Week has been likened to real-world instances of collective narrative pivots in totalitarian contexts, underscoring Orwell's insight into how hatred serves as a tool for ideological conformity rather than genuine conflict resolution. In modern applications, proponents of the prescience argument extend Hate Week analogies to democratic societies' media-driven outrage cycles and political rallies, where social media amplifies daily "Two Minutes Hate"-style rituals against perceived foes, channeling public frustration into solidarity for ruling or elite narratives. Events like sustained vilification campaigns during elections or international disputes—such as fluctuating portrayals of adversaries in U.S. discourse—echo the event's role in redirecting existential discontent toward expendable targets, preventing scrutiny of systemic failures. However, these parallels are contested, with critics noting that Orwell modeled Hate Week on observed totalitarian spectacles like Nazi rallies, emphasizing on information absent in pluralistic media environments today. Debates on misapplications highlight how the concept is sometimes invoked hyperbolically in partisan to equate routine with dystopian , diluting its specificity to enforced under states. For example, labeling electoral disagreements or cultural debates as "Hate Week" overlooks the novel's core causal dynamic: hatred as a deliberate instrument of a wielding absolute power, including thought control, rather than voluntary expression in societies with free speech protections. Such usages, often amplified in pieces from ideologically aligned outlets, risk conflating of power with the orchestrated erasure of truth Orwell warned against, thereby undermining rigorous analysis of genuine authoritarian drifts. Empirical distinctions persist: unlike Oceania's Hate Week, contemporary events allow counter-narratives and lack the Party's capacity for retroactive historical forgery enforced by omnipresent monitoring.

References

  1. https://orwell.ru/library/novels/1984/english/en_p_2
  2. https://orwell.ru/library/novels/1984/english/en_p_1
  3. https://orwell.ru/a_life/MR/english/e_oah
  4. https://www.telelib.com/authors/O/OrwellGeorge/prose/NineteenEightyFour/part1sec1.html
  5. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/1984/section6/
  6. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/1984/section8/
  7. https://mondopolitico.com/library/1984/1984_c17.htm
  8. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/6550922-on-the-sixth-day-of-hate-week-after-the-processions
  9. https://bookanalysis.com/1984/hate-week/
  10. https://www.telelib.com/authors/O/OrwellGeorge/prose/NineteenEightyFour/part2sec9.html
  11. https://ejournal.warunayama.org/index.php/argopuro/article/download/8542/7613/25530
  12. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1314&context=ckjip
  13. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/handle/2077/37142/gupea_2077_37142_1.pdf?sequence=1
  14. https://www.montclair.edu/profilepages/media/331/user/nineteeneightyfourandthetraditionofsatire.pdf
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349594379_Media_Manipulation_as_a_Psychological_Warfare_in_George_Orwell%27s_1984
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358140548_A_Psychological_Study_of_Orwell%27s_Nineteen_Eighty-Four_through_Jungian_Personal_and_Collective_Unconscious
  17. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/1984/book-2-chapter-9
  18. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/1984/motifs/
  19. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20180507-why-orwells-1984-could-be-about-now
  20. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1594&context=srhonors_theses
  21. https://isj.org.uk/the-secrets-of-nineteen-eighty-four/
  22. https://www.historyextra.com/period/historical-inspiration-george-orwell-nineteen-eighty-four/
  23. https://fee.org/articles/orwell-s-1984-how-to-misread-a-classic/
  24. https://www.orwell.ru/a_life/MR/english/e_oah
  25. https://www.history.org.uk/files/download/499/1204285703/stalin_propaganda.pdf
  26. https://stalinsociety.net/?p=279
  27. https://www.rferl.org/a/27774611.html
  28. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD_Bdq1MLWg
  29. https://framescinemajournal.com/article/keeping-it-all-in-the-nuclear-family-big-brother-auntie-bbc-uncle-sam-and-george-orwells-nineteen-eighty-four/
  30. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/may/19/1984-review-stage-adaptation-confuses-orwells-classic
  31. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2010/mar/02/1984-review
  32. https://www.michaelrasbury.org/music/1984/1984.htm
  33. https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/americas-1984-welcome-to-the-hate/
  34. https://technews.iit.edu/2025/04/17/literally-1984-no-longer-just-an-internet-meme/
  35. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/29/magazine/trump-george-orwell-1984.html
  36. https://onlinevisas.com/us-immigration/orwellian-hate-week/
  37. https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/george-orwell-1984-russia-putin-propaganda
  38. http://dspace.univ-tlemcen.dz/bitstream/112/20357/1/soundes-trad.pdf
  39. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/oct/07/orwellian-nightmares-george-orwell-rage-culture-rewriting-1984
  40. https://www.remindmagazine.com/article/15112/1984-george-orwell-book-movie-anniversary/
  41. https://anothercity.org/the-dystopian-nightmares-of-orwells-1984-and-huxleys-brave-new-world/
  42. https://www.quora.com/Is-the-term-hate-speech-a-form-of-Newspeak-controlled-language-from-the-novel-1984
  43. https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/it-isnt-just-about-1984-orwells-essays-powerfully-resonate-today/
  44. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/donald-trump-george-orwell-1984/
  45. https://anthropoetics.ucla.edu/views/vw689/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.